OC4j10.1.2CMP bean not updating field after creating a record in the table.

Question

I have a simple table in Oracle 9i database:
SQL> desc temp_tbl
Name Null? Type
OPER_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(5)
OPER_STS_TM_DT NOT NULL DATE
OPER_STS_CD NUMBER(2)
First 2 fields are the Primary Key. last field is standalone. No FK references.
I generate a CMP bean using Jdeveloper 10.1.2 for this table.
Then I try to insert a record into this table and update the oper_sts_cd field.
Problem: CMP inserts the record correctly, but does not update the field: oper_sts_cd, even though trace indicates that the field has been updated.
( shown in pgm below).
THE SAME CODE WORKED in OC4J9.0.4 Container.
Since we upgraded to 10g Rel2 ( OC4J10.1.2) , it does not.
Code:
Session Bean:
package model;
import java.rmi.RemoteException;
import java.sql.Timestamp;
import java.util.Calendar;
import javax.ejb.CreateException;
import javax.ejb.FinderException;
import javax.ejb.SessionBean;
import javax.ejb.SessionContext;
import javax.naming.InitialContext;
import javax.naming.NamingException;
public class SessionEJBBean implements SessionBean
public void ejbCreate()
public void ejbActivate()
public void ejbPassivate()
public void ejbRemove()
public void setSessionContext(SessionContext ctx)
private TempTblLocalHome getTempTblLocalHome() throws NamingException
final InitialContext context = new InitialContext();
return (TempTblLocalHome)context.lookup("java:comp/env/ejb/local/TempTbl");
public void createOperation() throws RemoteException
try
TempTblLocalHome tempHome = (TempTblLocalHome) this.getTempTblLocalHome();
System.out.println("Succcess loading Temp Entity EJB");
Timestamp currDate = new Timestamp(Calendar.getInstance()
.getTimeInMillis());
TempTblLocal tempLocal = tempHome.create(new Long("1294"),currDate,new Long("1") );
System.out.println("created Temp Op=" + tempLocal.getOperId() + " date=" + tempLocal.getOperStsTmDt() );
//tempLocal.setOperStsCd(new Long("" + 1) );
Long stsTypeCd = new Long("1");
System.out.println("Putting long value in db=" + stsTypeCd + "-");
tempLocal.setOperStsCd(stsTypeCd);
System.out.println("Stored value in db=" + tempLocal.getOperStsCd() );
catch( NamingException ne)
throw new RemoteException(ne.getMessage());
catch(CreateException ce)
throw new RemoteException(ce.getMessage());
ejb-jar (generated)
<entity>
<description>Entity Bean ( CMP )</description>
<display-name>TempTbl</display-name>
<ejb-name>TempTbl</ejb-name>
<local-home>model.TempTblLocalHome</local-home>
<local>model.TempTblLocal</local>
<ejb-class>model.TempTblBean</ejb-class>
<persistence-type>Container</persistence-type>
<prim-key-class>model.TempTblPK</prim-key-class>
<reentrant>False</reentrant>
<cmp-version>2.x</cmp-version>
<abstract-schema-name>TempTbl</abstract-schema-name>
<cmp-field>
<field-name>operId</field-name>
</cmp-field>
<cmp-field>
<field-name>operStsTmDt</field-name>
</cmp-field>
<cmp-field>
<field-name>operStsCd</field-name>
</cmp-field>
<query>
<query-method>
<method-name>findAll</method-name>
<method-params/>
</query-method>
<ejb-ql>select object(o) from TempTbl o</ejb-ql>
</query>
</entity>
<container-transaction>
<method>
<ejb-name>TempTbl</ejb-name>
<method-name>*</method-name>
</method>
<trans-attribute>Supports</trans-attribute>
</container-transaction>
orion-ejb-jar.xml (generated):
<entity-deployment name="TempTbl" data-source="jdbc/Marcs_DS" table="MARCS.TEMP_TBL">
<primkey-mapping>
<cmp-field-mapping>
<fields>
<cmp-field-mapping name="operId" persistence-name="OPER_ID" persistence-type="NUMBER(5)"/>
<cmp-field-mapping name="operStsTmDt" persistence-name="OPER_STS_TM_DT" persistence-type="DATE"/>
</fields>
</cmp-field-mapping>
</primkey-mapping>
<cmp-field-mapping name="operId" persistence-name="OPER_ID" persistence-type="NUMBER(5)"/>
<cmp-field-mapping name="operStsTmDt" persistence-name="OPER_STS_TM_DT" persistence-type="DATE"/>
<cmp-field-mapping name="operStsCd" persistence-name="OPER_STS_CD" persistence-type="NUMBER(2)"/>
</entity-deployment>

Answer 1

>
Srini.r wrote:
> I have added a new field in IT0006
> Srini R
Have you done this through PM01?
~Suresh