OIM Track request - all provisioned and approved

Hi experts,
is there any way we give permissions to ALL Users to track requests in OIM.
Now only xelsysadm can see all requests means requests which are approved and completed.
I am using OIM 10g .
Thanks,
Pallavi

Use Below Link:
Re: OIM 10g: Requests > Track Doesn't show any requests status
Re: OIM 10g: Requests > Track Doesn't show any requests status

Similar Messages

OIM 11gR2 Request Validator Plugin and Axis based Web Service Client

Hi,
I am trying call a web service client generated using axis2 from a request validator plugin in OIM 11gR2 and I have all the axis related jar files under the plugin lib folder but it fails due to the axis reference issues.
I tried putting the jar files under different locations like thirdparty folder, server lib etc. But it is giving issues every where. Please let me know if you have some solution.
Thanks in advance,

Haven't worked on this, but have you tried by putting the axis libraries inside the plugin lib folder when you are building up the plugin? Also you need to check asix2 compatibility with weblogic version with R2.
-Bikash

Keeping track of parts selected and approved already

I have the following tables
create table table_one
       table_id varchar2(40),
       location_place varchar2 (100)
);made using the following insert statement
insert into table_one
    (table_id, location_place)
values
    ('g1223', 'NEWYORK');
insert into table_one
    (table_id, location_place)
values
    ('g1224', 'BOSTON');
insert into table_one
    (table_id, location_place)
values
    ('g1225', 'DALLAS');
insert into table_one
    (table_id, location_place)
values
    ('g1226', 'NEWYORK');
insert into table_one
    (table_id, location_place)
values
    ('g1226', 'PARIS');
insert into table_one
    (table_id, location_place)
values
    ('g1226', 'ABIDJAN');
    now my question is, I have the idea in my mind already but the syntax is the main problem since I am still a beginer in oracle. I can do this easily in visual.studio.net but I have to do it first in oracle to test it out and see whether it works.
question
I am trying to create a simple interface whereby from the above table, three table_id will be displayed and basically what happens is the user has to look for those three table_id physically in the real world. Now if those table_id has been found, the user is able to enter a simple input like Y or 1 which signify found and N or 0 signify not found. Now once the input are entered, those table_id are transferred to a new table called table_two. see code
create table table_two
       table_id varchar2(40),
       location_place varchar2 (100)
);THe idea of using a table_two is to prevent the same table_id from being picked and looked for all the time. Instead, what is meant to happen is basically everyday a new table_id from table_one is going to be picked and the user will search for them phyiscally and input 1 or Y, this has to occurs so that in a year all table_id are searched for physically. Note also, sometimes the user might not be able to get to all table_id picked for that day. Also, table_one techincally has up to 300,000 table_ids. These are just samples I included. My question though. How can this simple interface be implemented. I will appreciate any help. Thank you
Edited by: user13328581 on Aug 23, 2010 12:42 PM

I just noticed your table actually appears to use a combination of table_id and location_place as its primary key. Is this correct, does your primary key consist of these 2 columns, or is there a different column that by itself is the primary key? As is, my suggested solution won't work, but if you can tell me this, I can give you an example that will work.
If I assume you use both columns as your primary key, here are 2 options for you:
CREATE TABLE     table_three
(     table_id     VARCHAR2(40)     NOT NULL
,     location_place     VARCHAR2(100)     NOT NULL
,     date_found     DATE
INSERT INTO     table_three
VALUES ('g1226', 'NEWYORK', SYSDATE-10);Then use the following query to populate your list of table_id/locations to check:
SELECT     t1.*
FROM     table_one t1
,     table_three t3
WHERE     t1.table_id          = t3.table_id (+)     -- (+) for outer join, since we want to include all values in table_one, whether or not there's a record for that value in table_three
AND     t1.location_place     = t3.location_place (+)
AND     (     t3.date_found     <= ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE, -12)
     OR     t3.date_found     IS NULL
;(given the one record inserted in table_three, this query will return 5 records)
Or, if you want a record of when something was checked and whether it got a 'Y' or an 'N' (instead of the above, which assumes you only care if something is a 'Y'), you can use:
CREATE TABLE     table_four
(     table_id     VARCHAR2(40)     NOT NULL
,     location_place     VARCHAR2(100)     NOT NULL
,     date_checked     DATE
,     found_flag     CHAR(1)
INSERT INTO     table_four
VALUES ('g1226', 'NEWYORK', SYSDATE-10, 'Y');Then use the following query to populate your list of table_id/locations to check:
SELECT     t1.*
FROM     table_one     t1
WHERE     NOT EXISTS     (
               SELECT     1
               FROM     table_four     t4
               WHERE     t4.table_id          = t1.table_id
               AND     t4.location_place     = t1.location_place
               AND     found_flag          = 'Y'
               AND     date_checked          > ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE, -12)
;And, if you do have multiple people checking these items, John's suggestion is really good.

CUP e-mail notifications + submit and approve requests

Hi experts,
I configured the workflows in CUP and now im trying to configure the email notifications . The CAD's that I've set are:
1. Request Petitioner
2. Internal Control
3. Security
and the approver determinator for each stage are:
1. Petitioner
2. Internal Control
3. Security
So, I need to know two thinks:
1. Could the person who submits a request, send it and approve with a single mouse click? given that the same person must submit a request and then approve it, would it be possible to perform both actions at once?
2. I would like to set e-mail notifications to the appropiate role owner, it 's possible? The problem is that we don´t set the role owners like approvers determinator.
Thanks in advance
Marta

Hi Marta,
In answer to question #1: You could possibly achieve this by changing your workflow but I do not think you want to do so. You would have to guarantee that submission was always done by those that approve the first stage in you workflow.
Question #2: I am not sure I understand what you would like to do. From what you state, I am assuming the Role approvers are stored in the Role file (CUP >> Configuration Tab >> Roles >> Search Roles/Create Roles) and not in a CAD. Are you looking to personalize the email for each role approver so he/she knows exactly which of his/her roles are in the request to approve from the email notification?
Renee
Edited by: Renee Schmoker on Feb 11, 2011 4:58 PM

EBusiness Suite User "Auto-provisioning" and "Self-Request" Problem

I have two types of OIM User, Staff and Contingent
Staff (Role = Full-Time)
Contingent (Role = Contractor / Role = Consultant)
Resource Object: eBusiness Suite User
Here's my RO configuration:
Auto Pre-populate: true
Allow Multiple: true
Self Request Allowed: true
Allow All: true
Auto-Launch: true
EBS Connector, by default has two forms:
UD_EBS_UO: Object Form
UD_EBS_USER: Process Form
I have requirement which will auto-provision eBusiness Suite User resource to Staff users.
Originally, UD_EBS_OU is the table name used by the RO. For auto-provisioning to work, I have implemented it this way:
First, I have defined a User Group for Staff and assign an Access Policy to it (for users with Role == Full-Time).
Then, I have detached Object Form UD_EBS_UO from the RO. This way, when Staff user is created in OIM, it is automatically provisioned with eBusiness Suite User, though it won't have a Resource Form, only a Process Form. Process Form fields are automatically pre-populated with values (via my Pre-populate adapters).
Now my problem is during Self-Request. Contingent user doesn't get auto-provisioned with EBS RO, but he can self-request for it. Problem is, since I detached the Object Form from the RO, user is not seeing any form during request. And I have a requirement that approver of the request should also be able to view/modify the details of the request form. But that is not possible now that Object Form does not exist for this RO.
Is it possible that Self-Request and Auto-Provisioning works both ways under the same Resource Object? How do I configure that? Appreciate your quick response and help. :)
Edited by: user10202544 on Feb 10, 2010 3:27 AM

Yes I have set permissions to all users for the Object Form.
It is required for me to have both Self Request and Auto-provisioning work for eBusiness Suite RO.
During approval, however, the approver needs to see the Object Form (where he can view/modify its values before approving it). That's impossible for me since I detached the Object Form from the Resource Object. I need do to this for auto-provisioning to work.
It seems that it doesn't work both ways. Any other suggestions?

OIM 10g: Requests Track Doesn't show any requests status

Hello,
OIM 10g BP15:
I've created a group "oim-admin-group" ("admuser" is the member of this group).
I've assigned quite a few "Menu Items" access required for "oim-admin-group" group including:
* Track Requests menu item
Also, assigned "permissions" on all objects to this group.
However, when "admuser" logs in and perform a search on Requests > Track > Search:
he don't see any results but the message:
"Your search did not return any results. Try again. "
I added "oim-admin-group" with "read" permissions to
* Organization > Xellerate User > Administrative Group >
* Organization > ABC (User's org) > Administrative Group >
Also, in (with "read" permissions)
* Resource > "Request" > Resource Administrators
* Resource > "Xellerate users" > Resource Administrators
* Resource > "Xellerate Organizations" > Resource Administrators
However, "admuser" still not able to track requests and sees same response.
Any suggestions ?
Thanks,

Looks like the "Administrative queues" implementation could have been planned around design time. Then the requests could be assigned and managed by different roles(groups) member with different access levels in OIM.
However, in my current setup - all workflows follows this rule 1) Route the request for manager approval 2) After successful manager approval, route it for application group approval (2nd step of approval). Implementation of "Administrative queues" in this setup looks difficult to me.
Any comment?
Thanks,

Unable to configure Request based provisioning in OIM 9.1.0.1

Hi,
I have been trying to configure request based provisioning wherein Admin can request to provision a resource for a certain user. I have checked on the Auto Prepopulate and Auto Save options in the Process Definition. The problem which I am facing is that if I uncheck the Auto save option, admin's request is completed properly and an Approval request is generated. If the admin approves it, the resource status is set to Provisioning. Inside the resource object, there's only one task System Validation with status completed. The process form is empty if I view it. But if i go to edit i can see the fields being populated. After saving the form, i can see the data in the "View" option too. After this, I am able to add a task "Create User" and provision the user to Active Directory.
But if i check the Auto Save option in the Process definition, the request is completed but no approval task is generated. There is nothing in the User's resource profile as well.
What could be the reason for this and what could be a probable solution in such a scenario? I seek all your help in order to resolve this issue.

I have configured the approval tasks and the provisioning is working fine. The error which i am facing now is with 2nd level approver. I want the first level approver to be the requestor's manager, which is working fine. But when i am trying to fetch the Manager details of the requestor's manager (Requestor->Manager-> Manager), I am facing the below error.
Running GETSECONDLEVELAPPROVERTYPEUSER
2012-10-31 13:20:28,956 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = com.pldt.adapter.ad.TaskAssignment
2012-10-31 13:20:28,957 INFO [STDOUT] Running GETSECONDLEVELAPPROVERKEY
2012-10-31 13:20:28,957 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = com.pldt.adapter.ad.TaskAssignment
2012-10-31 13:20:28,957 INFO [STDOUT] ***************************Inside getSecondLevelApprover***************
2012-10-31 13:20:28,974 INFO [STDOUT] **************************usrKey**********1
2012-10-31 13:20:29,039 INFO [STDOUT] *****************ResultSet1***********Thor.API.tcMetaDataSet@5b895cb9
2012-10-31 13:20:29,080 INFO [STDOUT] *****************ResultSet2***********Thor.API.tcMetaDataSet@68d6c6eb
2012-10-31 13:20:29,080 ERROR [STDERR] java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Long cannot be cast to java.lang.String
2012-10-31 13:20:29,081 ERROR [STDERR]      at com.thortech.xl.adapterfactory.events.tcAdpEvent.setKeyValue(Unknown Source)
2012-10-31 13:20:29,081 ERROR [STDERR]      at com.thortech.xl.adapterGlue.ScheduleItemEvents.adpGETSECONDLEVELAPPROVER.implementation(adpGETSECONDLEVELAPPROVER.java:56)
2012-10-31 13:20:29,081 ERROR [STDERR]      at com.thortech.xl.client.events.tcBaseEvent.run(Unknown Source)
2012-10-31 13:20:29,081 ERROR [STDERR]      at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.runEvent(Unknown Source)
2012-10-31 13:20:29,081 ERROR [STDERR]      at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcScheduleItem.handleTaskAssignPostInsert(Unknown Source)
2012-10-31 13:20:29,081 ERROR [STDERR]      at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcScheduleItem.eventPostInsert(Unknown Source)
2012-10-31 13:20:29,082 ERROR [STDERR]      at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(Unknown Source)
I am passing the user key of the manager to fetch his manager's data. Please suggest a resolution for this.

OIM 11g R2 - AD provisioning based on Role and Access Policy

Hi, for Active Direcotry integration i used some prepopulation plugin for populationg resource form (based on http://fusionsecurity.blogspot.sk/2013/01/populating-request-attributes-in-oim.html).
It's work fine - requested account was fully provisioned.
Can i use this plugins for Role based provisioning?
I try to create access policy and associated role but when attached the role to the user and run Evaluate User Policies Job, account can't be provisioned.
In diagnostic.log i found.....
[oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Immediate consequences are returned with event - InitiatePolicyEvaluationAndProvisioning
[oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Next Waiting child process is ..........6380 sync = false
[oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] First Waiting child process is ..........6380
[oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Kernel executing default validation with process id, event id, entity and operation 6,380.0.Resource.ACCESS_POLICY_BASED_PROVISION
[oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Kernel completed the child orchestration - 6380.6379
[oracle.iam.platform.kernel.dao] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Inserting records for orchestration cleanup
[oracle.iam.platform.kernel.impl] [.....] [userId: oiminternal] [.....] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Completed orchestration with action result - 113

Hi, all
I try to fill Access policy Process Form. Account request was created and provisioned when field AD Server and Organization Name was filled in, but pre-population plugin doesn't fired
The question is.... How can i use pre-population plugin for populating request dataset used with request generated by access policy....
Is it possible to use plugins for requests generated based on access policy?
a.

How to Configure OIM 9.1 for Request-Based Provisioning

Hi experts,
I am new to OIM and need to know how to configure request based provisioning. Here is the scenario.
My environment has two target systems (Sun LDAP and Novell EDirectory) configured for provisioning to OIM 9.1
A user should be able to login, request either or both (SUN LDAP and EDir) for self or others.
Now the request should go to an admin for approval.
Once approved, the requested accounts should be created on the target systems.
Please guide me on the procedure to be followed.
Many thanks in advance

You will have to download the standard out of box connector for these target systems & will have to import it through the Deployment manager into OIM. Then you will have to create the Process definition of approval type & attach it to the same resource object. Please read the belo link before implementing any thing. This will provide you a better idea.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10391_01/doc.910/e10363.pdf

How can I get approver of a request in request based provisioning

How can I get the approver of a request in Request Based Provisioning if the request is assigned to a group of user.
I need to get the actual approver (the one who logged in and approved amongst the approver group ) while the provisioning process gets executed.
Also,
as provisioning is triggered , can i put some value into a feild of the obj/process form.
Thanks

You can see the OSI table..
Also you can see Request History API.

OOTB Request Based Provisioning in OIM 11g

Hi Experts,
I am new to 11g approval work flow.
I am able to do following thing:
1) User login to OIM self user page.
2) User is able to raise request for new resource XYZ Resource.
3) On succesful submission, the Request goes to approval and its assigned to XELSYSADM
4) Once the xelsysadm is approving the request, the user gets access to XYZ Resource.
The above workflow is working.
I want instead of Xelsysadm, the request should get assigned to user's manager.
Is it possible to achieve OOTB?
Please reply!!
Regards,
J

Just wanted to add
There are three levels of approvals:
Template Level -- 1st Level
Request Level -- 2nd Level
Operation Level -- 3rd Level
set the Request Level to Auto Approval by checking the box on the request templateThis will Auto Complete the Template Level Approval
In case if you want to Auto Approve the Request Level then you need to create Approval Policy.
Request Level and Operation Level are handled at APPROVAL POLICY.

OIM 9.1.0.2 - Track request

Hi Gurus,
I have a group that should track all the requests.
How should I configure that group? Which permissions should I give to it?
I have given the Track request menu item as well as all the permission with the word Request, but it doesn't work.
Any tip.
Thanks in advance!!!!

No need for custom menu item. You'll have to add that group in Administrative Queue. See the thread:
Re: Assign Menu Item of Request Track to a group

Tried to rename some tracks in a playlist and it renamed EVERYTHING IN MY MASSIVE LIBRARY!! Now all my ID3 tags are wrong! THOUSANDS OF THEM!

Had some home-made music I wanted to bring into my library which had no Meta info, so in the past I'd create a playlist so I can easily find the new additions amid my 25,000 songs, and give them proper meta info. Tried this today with latest iTunes and when I renamed one track, it applied those changes to my whole library before I realized what was happening and stopped it. Now I have 8000 tracks that all think they're on an album called "Acoustic Glory". Go ahead and try to replicate this, I dare you. It's a tried-and-true BUG! Now I'm screwed. What am I gonna manually adjust the meta on 8000 tracks? Fat chance. I tried some 3rd party apps that pull from the internet but they never work. Thanks a lot iTunes 11, for ruining my music life. Would love to get some easy fix suggestion from an apple expert.

This "original file cannot be found" thing happens if the file is no longer where iTunes expects to find it. Possible causes are that you or some third party tool has moved, renamed or deleted the file, or that the drive it lives on has had a change of drive letter. It is also possible that iTunes has changed from expecting the files to be in the pre-iTunes 9 layout to post-iTunes 9 layout,or vice-versa, and so is looking in slightly the wrong place.
Select a track with an exclamation mark, use Ctrl-I to get info, then cancel when asked to try to locate the track. Look on the summary tab for the location that iTunes thinks the file should be. Now take a look around your hard drive(s). Hopefully you can locate the track in question. If a section of your library has simply been moved, or a drive letter has changed, it should be possible to reverse the actions.
Alternatively, as long as you can find a location holding the missing files, then you should be able to use my FindTracks script to reconnect them to iTunes .
tt2

My itunes is playing up. every time I play a track or album I get a crackling interference noise. What's this all about and how can I stop it?

my itunes is playing up. Every time I play a track or album I get a crackling interference noise. It sometimes abates for a while but then comes right back again!What's this all about and how can I stop it?

See if this article will help:
iTunes and QuickTime for Windows: Audio does not play or plays incorrectly
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1362

Difference between Due Date for All Tasks and Duration per task in an approval workflow

Hello,
I'm starting to read up and learn about approval workflows in Designer 2010. I am confused by the fields "Due Date for all Tasks" and the "Duration per task". I understand that the Due date for all Tasks is the date that all
of the tasks in the workflow must be completed by. And I understand that the duration means each task has x number of days to complete.
But I dont know whey we need them both. If I have the task duration set to two days and there are 3 tasks involved, then wouldn't the due date be 6 days from the start? Why would I have a due date for all tasks that is completely different than
the sum of the duration of days for each task?
Please help shed some light!

Hi Michelle,
Due date for all tasks, this setting specifies the date by which all tasks are due. It’s used for serial and parallel
task.
Duration per tasks, this setting specifies the date by which an individual
task is due, it’s used for serial workflow participants.
Note, when you create an approval workflow, select task process participants(approvers oob approval workflow), we can also
select once at a time(serial) or all at once(parallel).
For more information, see
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint-server-help/use-an-approval-workflow-HA101793831.aspx
Best Regards.
Kelly Chen
TechNet Community Support

OIM Track request - all provisioned and approved

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for