One profile for each agent ?

Hello,
We are currently upgrading from Sunopsis V3 to ODI 10.1.3.4.0.
With Sunopsis we use several agents (more than 10), but they all use the same Sunopsis user.
For ODI installation I would like to add some security, for example each agent would use a specific ODI user, and this user could access only some servers.
This way, the agent from application X could not execute a scenario that accesses to servers from application Y.
Is this possible ?
What's the best way of doing this ?
Thank you
Nicolas

Hi Cezar,
Thank you for your answer.
In fact I tried to do the same thing, but with servers (because i think it would be easier to maintain).
I created one user with 2 profiles : "OPERATOR" and "CONNECT NG SRV" (a non generic profile for the "data server" object.)
But I didn't manage to add data servers to this user (the drag & drop does'nt work).
So I think I'm going to follow your advice...
(the disadvantage is that it's necessary to add each new version of one scenario to the user)
Thank you
Nicolas

Similar Messages

Multi-column Index vs One index for each column

Hello everyone,
i have one table about 20 000 000 rows, some developers have to generate reports on it and i want to create indexes on this table.
The table has 34 columns, no primary key, no unique keys.
The "where..." clause of the reports usually use 8 columns but some reports uses 8 + some other columns.
can any one help me on what kind of indexes do i have to create?
1. one index for each column used in "where clause"
2. one index for 8 columns and some other indexes for other used columns
3. one index for all columns
or something else etc...
br flag

i have one table about 20 000 000 rows, some developers have to generate reports on it and i want to create indexes on this table.
The table has 34 columns, no primary key, no unique keys.
The "where..." clause of the reports usually use 8 columns but some reports uses 8 + some other columns.
can any one help me on what kind of indexes do i have to create?
1. one index for each column used in "where clause"
2. one index for 8 columns and some other indexes for other used columns
3. one index for all columns
or something else etc...What's the version of your data base? what kind of database you have, DWH or OTLP? The answer might depend on the type of database as far as bitmap indexes might suit or might not depending if you are runing DWH or OLTP kind of database
Let me suppose that you are runing OLTP database and you have a where clause with 8 columns.
1) are all those where clause equalities (where col1 = and col2 =) or there are inequalities?
2) could you evaluate the most repetitive columns?
3) could you know the column that could have the best clustering factor (the column which most follow a certain order in the table)
Based on that I would suggest to create one b-tree index having 8 columns (even though that it seems for me to high) this index should follow the following points:
1) put the most repetitive column at the leading edge (and compress the index if necessary)
2) put the columns that are used in equalitity predicate first
3) put the column having the best clustering factor first
The most precise index you have the best access you could gain.
Of course that you have to know that an index access is not always good and a FULL table scan is not always bad.
Best regards
Mohamed Houri
www.hourim.wordpress.com

Get only one row for each kind of a column

hi there!
i have a little problem.
I have a table with 10 columns. One of them has repeated values. My goal is to get all the rows with this column only one time for each values that it has.
Ex:
Col1 Col2 Col3
A A A
B B B
C A C
D C D
Column 2 has repeated values. My goal is to get:
A A A
B B B
D C D
Only one time each value of column 2.
Thanks guys! ;)

SQL> CREATE TABLE Tbl (col1 VARCHAR2(1),col2 VARCHAR2(1),col3 VARCHAR2(1));
Table created.
SQL> INSERT INTO Tbl VALUES ('A','A','A');
1 row created.
SQL>              INSERT INTO Tbl VALUES ('B','B','B');
1 row created.
SQL>              INSERT INTO Tbl VALUES ('C','A','C');
1 row created.
SQL>              INSERT INTO Tbl VALUES ('D','C','D');
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> SELECT * FROM tbl t1
2 WHERE
3 rowid=(SELECT min(rowid)
4         FROM tbl t2
5         WHERE t1.col2=t2.col2);
C C C
A A A
B B B
D C D
SQL> SELECT * FROM tbl t1
2 WHERE
3 rowid=(SELECT max(rowid)
4         FROM tbl t2
5         WHERE t1.col2=t2.col2);
C C C
B B B
C A C
D C DEdited by: Saubhik on Aug 3, 2010 1:31 AM

How do I program a NI 6602 card to send trigger pulses, one at each output port, triggered by an input trigger signal, using only one counter for each output port?

Hello,
I have managed to program a NI 6602 card in LabView to send pulses on three different output ports, one pulse on each output port (with individually chosen delays) for each input trigger pulse coming on a separate input port. It is the DAQmx Create Channel (CO-Pulse Generation-Time)-VI that I have used for this, see attached code. However, this VI controls both pulse delay and pulse width, and therefore uses two counters for each output port (although you only specify one counter in the VI input signals), as I understand.
In my application though, I only need to have the delay chosen, the pulse width can be arbitrarily short, and thus I should only need one counter for each output port. How do I accomplish to program this in LabView?
Best regards,
Claes
Attachments:
Configure Side Camera Flash 1 Triggering.vi ‏47 KB

Well you're welcome to do that--it will work just fine as long as you are configuring a start trigger.
<rant>
However, personally I really don't like putting multiple counter outputs in the same task. I have seen so many people assume that the counter outputs would be synchronized due to having them in the same task when this is not the case (you need to configure a start trigger in order to synchronize the counter outputs even if they are in the same task). This is the only case I can think of where multiple channels in a DAQmx task are not automatically synchronized.
As an example:
Running this on my PCIe X Series gives a measured 2 edge separation of 1 ms + {7.78 us - 10.11 us}. This would likely be much worse on a bus with more latency (e.g. USB).
The resulting output is close enough to what you might expect that it might go unnoticed, but really these counter outputs are not synchronized and it would be easy to glance at the code and not even think twice about it. For the small amount of extra work on my end to create a separate task for each counter, it really clears up some ambiguity about what the counters are actually doing. For me it's worth it.
So again, for your case there really isn't a problem with having the counters in the same task since you are using an external start trigger anyway. I have just gotten in the habit of avoiding doing this.
</rant>
Best Regards,
John Passiak

How can I have one row for each object?

Post Author: farnaz
CA Forum: WebIntelligence Reporting
I have 3 objcts that one of them is ID and second one is internal code and the third one is quantity.There is more than one value for each ID (becouse of internal code).I want to create a report based on ID and quantity (not based on internal code).I make a break on ID but the result shows me more than one row for each ID.so how can i have just one row for each ID?
another question:
how can I post screen shot of the results to my messag in forum?

Post Author: jsanzone
CA Forum: WebIntelligence Reporting
farnaz:
Have you tried to omit "internal code" from your grid? In normal circumstances, if you have "ID" and "Quantity" on the grid, then WebI will on its own summarize Quantity based on ID, however, this is provided that Quantity has been set up as a measure (or metric). The quickest way to tell if Quantity is a metric or not is to observe the color of its icon when you look at it in the data panel. If it is a purple (or sometimes appears as pink or fuscia) dot, then it's a measure, but if it is a blue box then it is a dimension. If you need Quantity as a measure then this will have to be modified at the universe (make it look like "sum(Quantity)" in the select phase of the object, and insure the object is defined as a number....

When we drilldown at document level it displays one record for each cube

Dear Experts .
The users want to see the report by status for the order detail report at document level it displays one record for each cube .
They want to see the single line for the order quantity , Amount, Billing quantity delivery and amount along with the Sales order number , billing document number billing date , delvert date ..et in signgle line. ( Sale order DeliveryBilling)
When we are doing on Multiprovider recording displaying from each cube.
We have tried with Constant selections and it is not giving the required results m since these want to see by status. Due to huge data performance reasons we re unable to use it .
Please provide your valuable inputs.
Thanks,
Mahesh.

Mahesh,
If you want to get detail data with respect to Sales order - delivery - Billing, on top of Multiprovider you can come up with Constant selection.
But I am not clear that why constant selection is not working properly, can I have some light on that.
Probably, you are struggling with multiple records .
I suggest you to go with end routine and map all fields to one IC and do reporting on that single IC, then your requirement will fulfill.
But here we need to take care of performance issues and process chain scheduling wile loading deltas.
If Multiprovider is not working properly , then try with Infoset(If you have more than 2 ICs it not possible).
Regards,
rvc

MS word It prints one file for each section of the document

With MS word (2004 and 2008)It prints one file for each section of the document.
somebody can help me with that????

Please post Office related questions on Microsoft's own forums for their Mac products:
http://www.officeformac.com/productforums

Multiple AVC Profile for each SSID

Hello,
I know there is limitation on the number of ACLs in each AVC profile, but is there a way to build multiple profiles and link it to the same SSID?
thanks,

Hi Sandeep,
thanks for your reply, I think Cisco should consider allowing provisioning multiple profile for each SSID as the number of applications that needs block are exceeding each profile..
I do have Guest SSID and I want to block everything using AVC, due to it's limitation, this cannot be achieved.
Thanks,

One connection for each request!trans

Hi there,
We migrated a big application from classic toplink to EJB 3, glassfish, EclipseLink. Some big module is still using classic toplink queries for a lot of things. As we didn't have the resource to change everything to pure ejb & jpa, we tried a couple of "tricks". They kind of work (in production), but I noticed that there is one connection for each db request.
It stills works fast enough, thanks to Glassfish connection pooling. But I guess this is horrible. Regarding transactions too...
Here is how I get a UnitOfWork:
JpaEntityManager jpaEntityManager = JpaHelper.getEntityManager(entityManager);
UnitOfWork unitOfWork = jpaEntityManager.getUnitOfWork();
Here is some eclipselink query which is causing thousand of db queries and acquiring about the same number of connections :
return ((Collection) unitOfWork.executeQuery(readAllQuery));
thx, Yannick

Hello,
ReadAllQueries will always go to the database by default to ensure that all the results are returned. So unless you are using inmemory query options, you will always see the same number of queries as executeQuery calls when using ReadAllQuery objects.
As for connections, the default is for connections to be obtained as they are needed, and then released when no longer needed. By default, EclipseLink/TopLink will use a read connection pool and obtain and release for each read query that is done outside of a transaction. When in a transactional context (ie reads through a uow where a transaction was started and changes made), reads will go through the write connection - this is done to ensure that transactional changes are picked up -and these will not be put into the shared cache until the transaction completes. So all reads done in the same uow while in a transaction will use the same write connection, since the uow needs to hold onto while the transaction is active anyway.
How are your transactions demarcated and the EntityManager obtained?
Best Regards,
Chris

Multiple parameters one row for each record

I have this query I want the user to be able to allow the user to enter multiple MATL_CODE_MOD as a parameters, the problem is that the GURMAIL table have multiple records one for each GURMAIL_MATL_CODE_MOD, so it will give me duplicates.. How I can code this, so I can allow the user to enter multiple MATL_CODE_MOD codes, and have only one row for each record...
and GURMAIL_MATL_CODE_MOD in ('8IBC','8IBD')
select
spriden_id,
spbpers_name_suffix   name_suffix,
spbpers_name_prefix   name_prefix,
spriden_last_name     last_name,
spriden_first_name    first_name,
spriden_mi            mi,
srbrecr_term_code,
srbrecr_majr_code,
srbrecr_program_1,
saturn_midd.utlq.f_matl_code_type(srbrecr_pidm)
FROM
saturn.srbrecr,
saturn.spriden,
saturn.spbpers,
SATURN.SPRADDR,
general.gurmail
WHERE
spriden_pidm = srbrecr_pidm
and gurmail_pidm = spriden_pidm
AND spriden_pidm = spraddr_pidm
--and srbrecr_term_code = decode(p_term ,'%',SRBRECR_TERM_CODE,p_term)
and spbpers_pidm = spriden_pidm
and spriden_change_ind is null
--and gurmail_matl_code_mod
and SRBRECR_PROGRAM_1 = 'CMQ'
and GURMAIL_MATL_CODE_MOD in ('8IBC','8IBD')
--AND SPRADDR_ATYP_CODE = 'CM'
AND SPRADDR_STREET_LINE1 IS NOT NULL;

Hi,
SELECT DISTINCT ...will keep duplicate rows out of the result set.
Depending on your data, another possibility might be to not join the table that contains GURMAIL_MATL_CODE_MOD. Do an EXISTS sub-query on that table instead.
If you need more help, post some sample data from all the tables, and the results you want from that data.
Simplify, if possible, You can probably post a problem with 2 or 3 tables, each with 2 or 3 columns, that will have the same answer.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Apr 22, 2009 2:28 PM

Create unique user profiles for each separate session

Hi,
How can I configure TS environment so that each user (who logs onto Windows using the same generic Windows user ID) gets their own unique Windows user profile.
For example, imagine a scenario where the users are logging onto Windows using the shared user "SYSTEMAPP"
The intention is to configure the TS server's Windows, so that it creates unique user profiles for each separate session, for example:
- SYSTEMAPP
- SYSTEMAPP.000
- SYSTEMAPP.001
- SYSTEMAPP.002 (etc...)
The server version for TS is Windows Server 2012 and not joined to AD. User IDs are created at Local Users and Groups.
Kindly advise.

Hi Susie,
Just to illustrate my point further. Let's say a user logged into the server using user ID SYSTEMAPP for the first session. So, if
you browse the folders in the server, you'll be able to see this:
C:\Users\SYSTEMAPP
Then, another user logged into the same server as SYSTEMAPP user using other session. In this case, my intention is to configure the
server to create another unique user profile as below:
C:\Users\SYSTEMAPP.000
Subsequently, if more users logged in using the same account, the unique counter number will keep on adding...
C:\Users\SYSTEMAPP.001
C:\Users\SYSTEMAPP.002
C:\Users\SYSTEMAPP.003
Previously, I checked from my third party software vendor that this can be done but I still cracking my head on this which is why led me
to this forum.
Kindly advise.

One controller for each usecase?

I'm using a mvc design pattern for my webapp.
In some of the books I've read it seems like they are suggesting to use one controller for each of the usecase. Is this the right way to do it?
For me it seems like you get so many classes. If you are dealing with a User, and has to modify info about a User, are you going to have a
- registerUserController
- updateUserController
- deleteUserController
Or should you have an UserController containing an if-else statement and have 3 functions, one for each of the usecases according to the User.
It seems like the advice is that when you have many if-else statements you should instead use interfaces. Is that correct?
Thanks

Thanks for a very good explanation!!
I'll explain my code a bit more detailed, so that I'm sure this is how you think I should do it.
- I'm using a frontcontroller and the Command/Action pattern.
- I'm not using a applicationcontroller.
- A controller is typically a servlet.
In my app I'm using an action class and an controller (servlet) class for each usecase. So this is the way to do it?
public class FrontControllerServlet extends HttpServlet {
private HashMap actions;
private ModelAndView mv;
public void init() throws ServletException {
// Action hashtable
actions = new HashMap();
// Makes action objects by putting controller objects into action objects
RegUserAction rua = new RegUserAction(new RegUserController());
UpdateUserAction uua = new UpdateUserAction(new UpdateUserController());
// Puts action objects into hash table
actions.put(rua.getName(), rua);
actions.put(rha.getName(), uua);
protected void processRequest(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res){
op = request.getParameter("op");
Action action = (Action)actions.get(op);
ModelAndView mv = (ModelAndView) action.perform(request, response);
} //End FrontController
public class RegUserAction extends Action{
public RegUserAction (Controller c) {super(c); }
public String getName() { return "regUser"; }
public Object perform(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) {
return c.handleRequest(request, response);
} //End RegUserAction
public class RegUserController implements Controller {
public Object handleRequest(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res){
String userName = request.getParameter("userName");
String userPwd = request.getParameter("userPwd");
... Registers user in database
....Returns a ModelAndView object confimrming that the user has successfully been registred in the database.
} //End RegUserController
public interface Controller {
public Object handleRequest(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res);
Does it seem like I'm on the right track?

Mail having more than one notification for each mail received

ever since I've upgraded to Yosomite X from Mavericks the Mail built in app is been acting weird. As Soon As it is connected to the internet the Mail Application collects emails n i keep on getting notifications at the top right bar for each single mail i would get minimum two notifications if not four or three. Am getting annoyed by this issue especially if ur waiting for an email n hyped about it i would be disappointed lol.
Plz if anyone has a solution for this offer you're help and it is well appreciated.

Mail preferences under Compose tab. Set which account to send mail from, or set it to use the highlighted account.
You might also verify in Mail preferences under Accounts, that each account has it's own SMTP server. Be sure the correct one shows for each account. I would also check the box to use only that server for that account, which will insure that the correct server and only that server will be used for the account. Otherwise if the SMTP server for the sending account fails, it will just switch to another account's server.

Design and Web Premium creates huge profile for each network user.

Just wondering how I can get around the Adobe Design and Web Premium creating a huge profile for each network user. When a new user logs in on the network a 6 GB Adobe Design and Web Premium folder is created in their profile. With dozens of students logging into each machine that equals dozens of 6GB folders.
Windows 7 environment.

Moved to Creative Suite Enterprise Deployment.

How do I set up a separate "sync" profile for each firefox profile?

I use separate Firefox Profiles for different purposes, each with it's own set of bookmarks. On XMarks, it is relatively simple to have different profiles, but can the same thing be done in Firefox sync? One account, multiple profiles.

hi gray001,
to have separated Libraries from iTunes for your wife and you, i would recommend that you create a new second windows user account
thats the easiest way to avoid mix up of itunes content
if you create a second windows user account - itunes is already installed and only needs to be configured for your wife

One profile for each agent ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for