One report, One Source System with multiple Company Codes -- Authorization

Hello Guys
We have 2 DEV source systems for our BI implementation right now. one for US (CCode - 406) an one UK(CCode - 301).
We have already completed the implementation for UK with 38 reports.
we are right now moving the US implementation.
when we move to QAS we are going to have one Source system with both US and UK data.
so when we move to QAS, the US clients wants to view the reports developed in UK implementation with their own data.
How can we do that. since some reports doesn't have company code to restrict the data to respective users.
Thanks and Kind regards,
shekar.

Hi
First make the company code authorization relevant in infoobject BEx explore tab
If your in BI7 , you have analysis authorization concept
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/66/019441b8972e7be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Regards
N Ganesh

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Master Creation through IDoc with Multiple Company Codes

    I am trying to create vendor masters sent from a 3rd party into SAP using CREMAS05 IDoc.  I have the requirement that the vendor should be created in each of 3 company codes and the vendor number is internally assigned in SAP.
    I create my IDoc with the general data E1LFA1M and multiple E1LFB1M & E1LFB5M Children.  When I post the IDoc using IDOC_INPUT_CREMAS which uses Call Transaction, the vendor gets created for the first company code, but the IDoc errors on the vendor extension XK01 for the next company code with the error: "Fill all required fields SAPMF02K 0111 ADDR1_DATA-NAME1". 
    In debugging through this, it appears that the vendor number that gets created in the first XK01 transaction does not get passed into the data for the second XK01 call and SAP tries to create a new vendor instead of extending the newly created one.
    If I force the value in during debug after the initial call transaction into the variable h_lifnr, it works fine (Vendor created with multiple company codes.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    -Larry

    I cannot give you exact solution, but can guess why this is happening, below is what I believe.
    I think Synchronous update is not happening in call transaction, second transaction is getting processed before the first one is saved, debugging it works fine, because we give system enough time to save while processing.
    Generally in call transaction we have MODE, if we pass S - then synchronous update happens, in your case, you need to find the way to incorporate this.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Ravi Kishore.

  • Issues with Multiple Company Codes

    Our organization consists of 42 legal entities which all have their own company code in SAP and their own organizational structure.  An example of how our jobs and positions are set up in SAP is provided below.
    Job:  Production Supervisor
    Position:  0140 Production Supervisor (includes company code before position)
    We may have 200 Production Supervisors company wide each with their own position number but they are tied to only one job number for Production Supervisor.
    We are considering changing how the jobs and positions are set up in SAP so that instead of Production Supervisor the job would be Supervisor III and the position would remain the same.  However, there may be other supervisor positions that will also be included in the Supervisor III job.  We are afraid this may cause issues in the future if we implement other areas of the HCM module including compensation management, succession planning, MSS and ESS.  Could we create a reporting structure seperate from the org structure so that executives at the corporate office would have access to information on all employees in their area of expertise company wide?  Any suggestions you have would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi,
    You can use the task object.
    Or check out the Qualification Management.
    Regards,
    Dilek

  • Multiple rows in BI Infocube/or DSO for one row in source system

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a typical scenario where in I have a ztable in R/3 system and it contains some custome transaction data.
    The business scenario wants it to split into multiple records in BI ( ofcourse keys for each records in BI would be unique). Either infocube or DSO can be used to store the data in BI.
    Is it possible to do that. As far as my knowledge goes( I have limited BI exposure) one record from source system ( read row) is transformed into one record ( row) in BI in simple transformation.
    Please give me some rough idea if its possible how can we achieve it.
    I know we can write an ABAP program and create a ztable to do it and use the ztable as source for incube/dso. But I want to use this as last option.
    Thanks
    Sumit

    Hi,
    An ODS will be better.
    Use a start routine.
    data-package --> package2
    create your own package with your rules.
    update.insert.modify.append....
    package2 --> data_package
    and from 1 row, you create n row as your rules would like..
    Regards,

  • How to schedule one report for multiple company code?

    How you can schedule reports in BW 3.5? Suppose I need to schedule one report for multiple company code, how can you do that and notify the users? I do not want to send multiple emails to the same user if the report runs for 20 times (for 20 different companies).
    points are given for ASAP replies.
    Thanks in advance
    Peter

    Dear Peter,
    Try to restrict the Company Code with  those 20 values and schedule.
    Regards,
    Ramkumar.

  • SEPA file – how to create one file for multiple company codes

    Dear experts,
    My company has multiple company codes and they process automatic payments (F110) for multiple company codes in the same run.
    The company wants to generate one SEPA file for all company codes.
    In OBPM1  for SEPA format in the section ``Payment medium output devided by level of detail`` I unchecked everything (attached).
    OBPM4 for SEPA format is showing `` No separation of payment medium output``.
    Unfortunately, when I run automatic payments (F110) for multiple codes, multiple files for each company code are created.
    Can anyone let me know how it is possible to create one SEPA file that will contain payments for multiple company codes?
    Thank you

    Hi Zara,
    Please check in transaction DMEE your format tree (eg. SEPA_CT), 'DMEE tree: properties' - tab 'Sort/key field'. Is the Sort/key field 'ZBUKR' defined there with Level 1?
    Please follow the recommendation of note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1742584
    Regards,
    Emöke

  • Impact of Merging multiple company codes into ONE

    Hi,
    We are currently doing a study for a client,  they have the following scenario where the client has got multiple company codes in SAP (due to some tax benefits they had initially created the company codes) now the tax benefits cease to exist and they are planning to consolidate/merge all the company codes into one legal entity. In the existing landscape all the company codes are in the same client. They are proposing to merge all the company codes into an existing company code.
    Trying to understand the impact of merging on SD and would appreciate your thiughts/insights into what could be the important critical impacts of merging and what are the factors to watch out for from an SD perspective. Client has VC and MTO scenarios.
    Thanks in Advance.
    M

    Hi,
    It all depends on your strategy. Will you be creating a new Sales organisations? or continue with the existing one? Also, please check with the client as to how the existing plants in the subsidery company  be treated in the holding company.
    You will have to check the master data, open items, Z programmes & most importantly CIN related settings.
    Hope this is helpful, please let me know if you require further inputs.
    Thanks.

  • Can Business One handle multiple company codes / multi national co. codes?

    I have been told that SAP Business one can not handle multiple company codes, is this correct ?
    Pl let me know.
    In addition to this, can it handle multiple company codes, that belongs to different countries.
    Thanks
    Arun Tulsi

    Answer from you second question: Yes and No.  When these different countries are in the same cluster, i.e. A or B , you can. Otherwise, you can't.
    Now back to your first question. If you want use B1 for multiple companies which are not related, then you shouldn't because any B1 licenses should be under strict control.  License is not shareable.  If they under one group, then there are no problem to have multiple companies with one exception as the first answer to your second question..
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • One Credit Control Area - Multiple Company Codes - Credit Management

    Hi All,
    my client has a requirement to go for one common control area & with different company codes.
    suppose if i have a customer in multiple company codes & i desire to have the credit control happening for individual company codes, is this possible???
    can i use the individual limit field extensively for credit limit per individual company codes???
    please pour your thoughts, i have a subsequent question too.
    regards
    ilango

    in this case how can i have the FD32 screen differentiated for different company codes?
    say for an european company code, i will have the document currency EUR & for the same customer in US, i will have it as USD.
    can i have this segregated?
    sorry, too many questions in single thread, but i dont want this to be tracked in different threads, Hope the moderator agrees too.
    regards
    ilango

  • One controlling area  with two company codes assigned with one CoA

    Hi,
    I   am having one controlling area  with two company codes assigned , i am using the same  gl for two company codes  as cost element , when i am positng the  miro for vendor purpose  it posted the error  , to avoid the  price difference purpose , i have given  one cost center  of  first company code in OKB9 , and  overcome the error , entries posted, when i am posting new entry for MIRO   in secod  company codes with same cost  element ,  price difference of that account should go to the other cost center  which specifically created for second company code,  in the OBK9 i have given  cost center first company code   of the same GL  account , now this is another new entry in the second company code with other cost center in the second company code  since the price difference  account should sit in the other cost center of second company code,  how to  over come  this problem, pls help me
    Thanks and regards
    Murugesan

    Hi,
    First, remove the default cost center in the cost element. Then, for the system to derive the correct cost center for each company codes, define one cost center for each compny codes in OKB9 just like this:
    Co Code   Cost Element   Cost Center
    1000          1000000              A
    2000          1000000              B
    So during MIRO, the system will derive these values you maintain in OKB9.
    Regards,

  • One lockbox for multiple company codes

    Is it possible to have one lockbox for multiple company codes?

    No, I don't think so. Lockbox is 1:1 for a Company Code.
    You configure Lockbox for a Company Code.
    You can use one of the 2 available Lockbox user exits (not sure which) to write a piece of code that searches invoices against the customer posted to different company codes. You will have to have the intercompany setups.
    You may find an OSS notes for intercompany clearing.
    Hope this helps!

  • One lockbox for multiple company code

    Hi Guru's.
    Currently we have one company code to many lockbox configured, process
    is working fine.
    We are in process of merging two companies.
    We have a scenario were we have one Lockbox shared between multiple
    company code, when we process the lockbox file lockbox process will
    clear one company code Invoice and other Invoice for different company
    code are unprocessed.
    We have looked in to user exit EXIT_RFEBLB20_001 and EXIT_RFEBLB20_002,
    was not much of help.
    Regards,
    KJ

    I had this scenario few years back in a company and we used exit RFEBLB20_002. We used logic to find the invoicing company code from the BSID table using the document number from lockbox file, then change the default lockbox company code to invoicing company code. Unfortunately this scenario will work only if you use unique document number ranges for each company codes which is not the case for most companies.
    Edited by: PaulKr on Sep 26, 2011 9:08 PM

  • Report for CS15 tcode with multiple material nos. in selection screen.

    I want to develop a report for cs15 but with multiple materials.
    Like in cs15 we enter the material and its plant, then click on multi level check box and get the output. But cs15 works only for a single material. I want to develop a report in which i'll give multiple material nos. and then i should get the output for each material entered just as the output that would appear in cs15 for that material.
    How do i do it.
    I have tried but i'm not able to track back.

    Hi Priti,
          try develop a interactive report which lists all the materials in the first screen and when you double click on each of the material then call transaction CS15 output by skipping the first screen .Use set parameter to pass the material .
    Regards,
    Sirisha

  • Report printing in excel with multiple sheets

    Hi Experts,
         I am working in Oracle Reports 10g.  I need to print the report in Excel....
    For this i have created .JSP file and now printing in Excel(Sheet1).
    My requirement is i need to print the report in multiple sheets.
    For example if i run the departments report then the generated excel file should be as below
    (Sheet1 - HR, Sheet2 - FINANCE, Sheet3 - MARKETING, etc.,)
    How can i do this?
    Thanks in Advance.

    Hi All,
       Is this possible  Report printing in excel with multiple sheets??
    Please give solution for my above post Report printing in excel with multiple sheets..
    Thanks,
    Su.gi

  • Automated deployments of Windows 7 on systems with multiple hard drives

    Last week I helped a customer use MDT2010 to deploy Windows 7 to ThinkStation systems with multiple hard drives.  The customer has multiple HDDs in the system and wants Windows to be installed to the HDD that is connected to SATA port 1.  Unfortunately Windows does not always assign "Disk 0" to the HDD on SATA port 1 - in fact it is completely random what disk ID gets assigned to which SATA port.  The bug is documented by Microsoft in KB937251:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/937251
    MDT2010 uses hard-coded disk IDs (0, 1, 2, etc) to specify where Windows gets installed.  And because of the bug, sometimes Windows gets installed to the HDD on SATA port 1 and sometimes it gets installed to a different HDD.
    The solution is to install Windows to the HDD identified by the "SELECT DISK SYSTEM" command of DISKPART.  This will always return the disk that is connected to the lowest SATA port.
    To configure this in MDT2010, use the following steps (refer to the attachment):
    1. copy "FormatPartition.txt" and "SystemDisk.vbs" to your Scripts folder in the Deployment Share. 
    2. in your Task Sequence, disable the existing step called "Format and Partition Disk" (see TaskSequence.jpg)
    3. create a new step at the same location called "Format and Partition Disk (custom)". The type is "General -> Run Command Line". The command line is " cmd.exe /c "diskpart /s %SCRIPTROOT%\FormatPartition.txt" "
    4. on the main screen for Deployment Workbench, right-click on the Deployment Share and select "properties", then click on the "rules" tab
    5. under section [Default], add the following entries (see Rules.jpg)
        - UserExit=SystemDisk.vbs
        - DestinationDisk=#DiskID#
        - DestinationPartition=1
    Hopefully this info will help someone else!
    Attachments:
    MDT2010.zip ‏261 KB

    Last week I helped a customer use MDT2010 to deploy Windows 7 to ThinkStation systems with multiple hard drives.  The customer has multiple HDDs in the system and wants Windows to be installed to the HDD that is connected to SATA port 1.  Unfortunately Windows does not always assign "Disk 0" to the HDD on SATA port 1 - in fact it is completely random what disk ID gets assigned to which SATA port.  The bug is documented by Microsoft in KB937251:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/937251
    MDT2010 uses hard-coded disk IDs (0, 1, 2, etc) to specify where Windows gets installed.  And because of the bug, sometimes Windows gets installed to the HDD on SATA port 1 and sometimes it gets installed to a different HDD.
    The solution is to install Windows to the HDD identified by the "SELECT DISK SYSTEM" command of DISKPART.  This will always return the disk that is connected to the lowest SATA port.
    To configure this in MDT2010, use the following steps (refer to the attachment):
    1. copy "FormatPartition.txt" and "SystemDisk.vbs" to your Scripts folder in the Deployment Share. 
    2. in your Task Sequence, disable the existing step called "Format and Partition Disk" (see TaskSequence.jpg)
    3. create a new step at the same location called "Format and Partition Disk (custom)". The type is "General -> Run Command Line". The command line is " cmd.exe /c "diskpart /s %SCRIPTROOT%\FormatPartition.txt" "
    4. on the main screen for Deployment Workbench, right-click on the Deployment Share and select "properties", then click on the "rules" tab
    5. under section [Default], add the following entries (see Rules.jpg)
        - UserExit=SystemDisk.vbs
        - DestinationDisk=#DiskID#
        - DestinationPartition=1
    Hopefully this info will help someone else!
    Attachments:
    MDT2010.zip ‏261 KB

Maybe you are looking for