One user assigned to several vendors SUS

Hi,
We are implementing SRM SUS ( SRM 5.0) Plan Driven Scenario.
Is it possible to assign one user to SEVERAL vendors in SUS?
In SUS, such user will be able to maintain company data and create invoices for each vendor.
Regards.

Hi Sachin,
First many thanks for your reply.
I a looking to assign one user to several VENDORS in SUS. So one user will handle invoices for several invoices as well chaning their profiles (contact data, adress, ... ect)
If you think it is possible, please ELABORATE (partner attribute?).
Regards.

Similar Messages

Hide Top level navigation if user assigned only one role

Hi,
I would like to hide the top level navigation if user assigned with only one role.
I can create role based rule to show desktop using Master rule collection, but is it possible by doing to with role count.
If user has multiple roles show desktop1 else show desktop2

not sure if this possible ,you may check feasibility of creating a application which checks user role count and if role count is = 1 load the Portal url (URL alais) which had TLN iview invisible in the same window else do nothing and load the portal with the desktop which has tln.
Put the application in framewrk page which has TLN visible.
create a URL alias and create a desktop -framework page which dont have TLN ,assign this desktop to this URL alias in rule collection set its priority before user conditions check in rule collection so that it has high priority before user or group check in rule collection.
you can create a poc in sandbox and check if it wiorks?

Purchased CC for business and can only assign one user. How can I assign more users to have it on all 4 computers in the office?

Purchased CC for business and can only assign one user. How can I assign more users to have it on all 4 computers in the office?

Hi there
You would need to purchase a seat for each user.
What you currently have is 1 seat = 1 user.
Kind regards
Bev

One check for several vendors

Hi Gurus: I am trying to create one payment for several vendors. I tried F-58 and it works fine. I also created a unique payment method to map to a specific account. The business requirement is "How can we pay one check to American Express" for several invoices from several vendors". So I added American Express as an alternative payee to each of the vendors. All works fine except that the client wants the record on the FCHX file that is sent to the bank as well as one check for that vendor. FCHX means that we would need to use F110 & not F-58. However in F110 I cannot group several vendors to be paid by one payee...correct?
Any help with be GREATLY Appreciated!
thanks
Brian

Hi,
I'm afraid I don't have an answer but I'd like to highlight the question/thread since we have the same issue.
We have several cases of invoice documents that needs to be posted to different vendors, because we need to report the Accounts Payable on the different vendors' VAT numbers for legal purposes. The payments for several documents might, however, be going to the same payee. I.e. we might have ten invoices booked on ten different vendors but with only one payee.
We are using the alternative payee/permitted payee functionality but the problem is that F110 generates one payment document per vendor. We would like to have one document per payee. This is possible in F-53 or F-58 (where I can manually select several vendors in the same clearing) but we need to use F110 since we are generating both check printouts and DMEE files for these payments. The bank charges us a fee for each payment, so in the example mentioned they would charge us ten fees instead of one. So it is very costly if this cannot be solved.
Any suggestions? The setting mentioned previously in this thread does not help.
Many thanks in advance for your input!
/Michael

Assign one contact person to all vendors

Hi folks
We will be using surrogate bidding , I want to assign one contact person to all Vendors , and currenctly in SRM you can only assign one contact person to one vendor , is there a way of bypassing this or of assigning contact person to multiple vendors ?

Hi Warona,
The application works as below:
1. While you access the application, the bidder should be selected for whom the surrogate bid is placed.
2. Then a bid can be placed, although multiple sur. bids are placed for the same bidder, th system will just ower write the previuosly created one (One Bid Invitation - One Bid or surrogate bid for a bidder)
3. Then if you want to submit a bid for a different bidder and for the same bid invitation, you have to go back to the application again (bacause only then you ca select the next bidder). Then the same cycles 1- 3 goes on.
Hopes this solves your problem.
Regards
Kathirvel

Can one business area be assigned to several company codes? how to do it?

Can one business area be assigned to several company codes?
what are the configurations?
thanks

Dear Humility,
If, I am not wrong, Business Area is assigned to Company Code via Finance (i.e. NO Direct assignment, but can be used across company code). You can assign a business area to an org. object through the account assignment tab.
Business areas are generally company-code independent. You can post to them from any company code. The Business area field shows up as an additional account assignment when posting to an account as long as the field is turned on in configuration. The field can be made a required entry during posting.
If certain company codes are not active in specific business areas, you can use a validation to prevent postings to this business area from the company codes specified.
Important Transactions, related to Business Area Configuration:
OX03     Create Business Area
OMJ7     assign Business Area to Plant / Valuation Area and Division
OVF2     Org Unit: Sales Area - Business Area Determination rule
OVF0     Org Unit: Business Area Determination rule
OVF1     Sales Area - Business Area Determination rule Slsorg/DstCh
Best Regards,
Amit
Note: Some Relevant Links:
[Business Area|http://www.sap-img.com/zf003.htm]
[SAP Business Area|http://www.saptechies.com/configure-the-sap-business-area/]
[Validation of Business Area for Company Code|Re: Validation of Business Area for Company code;

Assign to one user a temporary tablespace

Hi,
I would know how to assign to one user called scott a tempory tablespace called GTEMP
Thanks with anticipation
Roberto

Hi,
Please see this
SQL> alter user scott temporary tablespace gtemp;
User altered.Regards

What happens if we assign multiple roles to one user

Hi Experts,
what is the outcome of the scenerio where multiple roles are assigned to one user in MDM
example : role A has execute command for field X and another role B has read only command for the same field X, what happens if both the roles are assignes to user John?
Thanks in advance
Sharma.

hello Abhishake,
Thanks for the reply,
so does that mean the user will have the execute role even though the second role was read only?
Thanks,
sharma

Remove PR Mandatory for PO and Assign new PO Layout to one User

Hi Experts,
I want to remove PR mandatory for PO and assign new PO Layout for one User. I am facing following problem.
1. I have already created a function authorisation Z1 with reference to PR and assign the same in SU01, Paramenter EFB - Z1.
Now I have removed ref to purchase requisition tick and assign new PO layout in Z1.
But ref to PR not removed, and new po layout is not coming.
What should I do.
Thanks in advance.
GR

why dont u assign the new PO screen layout to the PO document type thru spro-mmpurchasingpo-define document type---here assign ur new field selection with the PO document type coz whatever the screen layout of PO comes while processing me21n,it comes due to the field selection present here as per my knowledge.
regards,
indranil

Assign theme to one user in EP5

I need to change the theme for one user in EP5.
Setting it in the sql database seems a quick solution.
How do I relate the user_id from table p320_user_portal to the id of the user in the ldap ?

As of configurator 1.7.1 this still seems un-possible. Contacted Apple enterprise phone support about this and they verified that at this time only one device can be assigned to a user. A suggested workaround was to label the user with a device specific tag (IE "$USERNAME [iPad]" "$USERNAME [iPhone]") but obviously this leads to some other complications. I asked the phone representative to please submit feedback concerning use cases where users need to have more than one device assigned. Hopefully this can be addressed. If other people have this question I would suggest submitting feedback at apple.com/feedback (no there isn't an option for configurator but I submitted my feedback under OS X).
The squeaky wheel gets the grease. Hopefully we will be heard.

Only one user at the time can execute VE01 (due to blockage of VEIAV)

Hi,
As I understand it only one user at the time can execute VE01 (or MEIS for arrivals). If someone is already executing the VE01 transaction the error-message "Table VEIAV is blocked by user XX" appears. It does not matter if one tries to execute it for different legal entities - no parallel processing seems to be possible.
This is a huge limitation for a global concern with many entities operating in the same SAP instance. Does anyone recognize this problem and are there any ways to get around it? It does not make sense that dispatches (VE01) and arrivals (MEIS) cannot be executed for several organizational units at the same time in parallel?
Thanks in advance,
Mats Hansson

yes I know this problem.
One should not maintain much thru this transaction.
for me it is not more than an emergency transaction, as it is not really more than table maintenance thru SM30
You should investigate what entries/changes the users have to make.
Limit these manual entries by having better data in the system, so that SAP can itself create the entries for this table.
Organize more, less users , maybe just one per company who shall maintain VEFU manually.
Train them to prepare their entries before they start using VEFU.
Explain that they should leave VEFU as soon as possible as the block other users.
assign maintenance windows to the users.

Account search functinality is not working for one user in portal

Hi friends,
We have configured E.P 7.0 with CRM 5.0 and configured CRM PCUI business package.
We have a role called <b>accounts and products</b> in portal. So accounts can be searched in this role.
Now our severity issue is for one of the super user,for ex su1, accounts search is not working in portal but the same is working in CRM GUI.
for example if we search for an account 233445(or any other account) in portal its showing no data found but if we search with the same criteria data is displaying CRM GUI.
We have checked with other 2 super ids. Both ends portal and gui search is working fine.
Am unable to figure out whats the cause of the issue as search is not working only for one user su1 .
we have checked by restarting the server also to clear the memory cache.But still search is not working in portal.
Could anyone of u please advice ASAP as this is severity issue.
Thanks & Regards
Sireesha.

Hi srinivas,
I have checked both the users credentials,permissions,groups in the GUI and also in the portal.
Both of the users profiles are assigned as same.
Could you please advice is there any other way to check it out?
Regards
Sireesha.

Pool vendor items from several vendors in automatic payment program / F110

Hello everyone,
I am wondering if you could help me with an issue about invoices and credit notes for several vendors in the APP/F110. We use ECC 6.0.
This is the situation: there is a group of vendors. Some vendors within this group have only credit notes posted to.
When running the APP/F110 for the group of vendors, there is a debit balance for the "credit note" vendors.
So far normal behaviour in SAP. But what I would like to do, is offsetting these credit notes with invoices posted on the other vendors (via the APP/F110).
In other words, pool together the open items of several vendors so they would be regarded as belonging to one vendor. This way, the credit notes will be cleared via APP/F110.
Does anyone know if this can be achieved in SAP? I have already searched on the forum and in SAP Notes, but no luck there.
Many thanks!
Kind regards
Becky

Hi
Assign the Vendor for which Credit memos are passed as (Partners/ Branch office functionality) for Vendors for which Invoices are booked. Than try running F110
Regards
Sanil

Why one user can not see plan output for some orgs while other users can?

We have several inventory/planning orgs. Suddenly one of the users is not seeing any plan output for some organizations. While other users are able to see plan out (planner workbench) for all org.
All users use the same responsibility.
Deleted all the folders to eliminate hidden query in default folder.
Any other thoughts?
Edited by: 918894 on May 5, 2013 10:22 PM

The issue is resolved.
In the user preferences, one user has Inventory Category Set and other user has Planning Category Set as the default. Items belonging to one Org were not assigned Planning Category Set. Thus they were not showing for the other user.
Thanks for the response.

Sharing iTunes library/playlist, only one user can run iTunes

Greetings everyone
Just got a new aluminum iMac, setting it up for the wife and kids. From the descriptions here, I have set up several accounts to share a single iTunes library, by creating aliases in each user's iTunes folder that point to the shared library. It seems to work great: I only have to import music ONCE (instead of once for each user), and if one user creates or changes a new playlist, everyone sees it, which is exactly what I wanted.
However, I have run into a small problem, and it is this. Under this setup, with everyone sharing the same library, *only one person can be running iTunes at a time.* If user A is running iTunes and doesn't quit the app when the computer is switched to User B or C, they get the message
----- +"The iTunes Library is locked, on a locked disk, or you do not have write permission for this file."+
----- Switch back to User A, quit iTunes, and then the others can launch iTunes fine (though again, just ONE of them). Same behavior regardless of whether the user is admin or not.
So, is there any way to enable more than one user to run iTunes at once under this shared scenario? I'm thinking iTunes may not allow multiple users to access the library file at once, so it may be necessary to have users quit iTunes or log out before switching accounts. Let me know if there is a workaround or if anyone has gotten this to work....
Thanks in advance!
sno-man

Hi, I just read your post here - I'd like to do exactly what you were able to do, that is, sharing one iTunes library with multiple user accounts on my iMac so that we can both use/add to the same library (I also want to do this with iPhoto, so I'm assuming it's the same process); would you mind quickly telling me how you were able to do this? I've been checking around and can't find a reliable answer. I'd appreciate it - thanks!

One user assigned to several vendors SUS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for