Open IR qty while doing MIRO eventhough GR/IR completed fully on PO.
on the intercompany PO, Qty is 40 PL and they have done Delivery/PGI then GR 29 PL first and 11 PL after 3 days.
asper their Intercompnay process, the IR will be automatically genereated after GR completed through batch job.
in this case When the GR done for 29 PL that day itself IR was created with 40 PL (received Qty is 29, setelled qty 40)
If we do MIRO, showing 11 PL is still open.
And my question is that,
1. The GR/IR net value is not zero. Normally if GR and IR are all processed, the GR/IR account should be cleared.
2. When AP accountant do MIRO, it shows that there are 11PL there, so strange.Normally if the IR is posted, when AP do MIRO, it should show blank.
Pleas advise.
suresh
Hi
Even if first GR is for 29PL then also MIRO for 40 PL is allowed .
But it is blocked for payment and qty vairance is their.
So in this as IR is made for 40 PL, and GR is made for 29PL GR/IR account remains open for 11 PL.
After doing second GR for 11PL the GR?IR accounts closed automatically and previous IR ( posted for 40PL) is released for doing payment automatically.
This is std setting in SAP.
Similar Messages
-
Account dertermination error while doing MIRO for third party PO
Hello,
This is regarding error message while doing MIRO (IR)
There is already a PO in the system with item category S ( Third Party ) &
Acc assignment object u2013 C (Sales order).
For this PO , I could find 10 invoices already posted in the system.
Between when these invoices were posted , there were some changes done to the PO.
But even after those changes , many invoices were posted in the system,
But now , when I try to post the invoice , I am getting the below error message.
the error message is ** Account determination for entry SKPL WRX 0002 _ 1020 not possible** while posting.
Message no. M8147
Diagnosis
The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key SKPL WRX 0002 _ 1020 is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation). The key is made up of:
u2022 Chart of account
u2022 Transaction key (= Posting transaction)
u2022 Valuation grouping code
u2022 Account grouping code
u2022 Valuation class
System Response
The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
If you have the authorization, check the Account determination in Customizing for Valuation.
Proceed
Note
The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A.
I have checked the entry in OMWD, where valuation grouping code is maintained against the valuation area & company code.
PLEASE SUGGEST ME SOME SOLUTION.
Thanks,
VinothHi Raman,
Yes, still i am getting error.
before when the invoice is posted , there is no error.
there are some 10 invoices posted already , but there are some changes done in the PO , after that they could post two invoices but for the third invoice , i am getting this error.
when the invoive is posted without error , these are the account movements that are hit
Here
441510 is a vendor account
61799410 is a WBS element G/L account
27411000 is a G/L for tax.
What could have pulled out this WRX error (Account determination for entry SKPL WRX 0002 _1020 not possible ) for me????
can u suggest me some solutions.
Thanks,
Vinoth -
Error while doing miro of network purchase order ( no funds center entered/
Hi,
we are facing one problem while doing miro of network service purchase order. System is giving message 'No funds center entered/derived in item 00030'.
We have activated funds management in Jul'10. The said network service PO belong to previous year. Also we have changed
commitment item of GL account related to concerned service order in Jul'10 & posted GRN one in apr'10 & one aug'10.
System is not allowing to cancel the service entry sheet.
Can anybody help on this.
regards
abhishekwe had activated the trace facility for FMDEIRIVE & found that all FC/Commitment item derived correctly. But while posting the document it is throwing an error.
Regards
Abhishek -
While doing MIRO, i am getting error:-Tax code V0 country IN does not exist
hi frds,
while doing miro. i am getting this error:-
pls correct me
Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
Message no. FF713
Diagnosis
You entered a tax code which is not defined for the country of the company code to be posted to in the tax calculation procedure.
System Response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
Check whether the company code is assigned to the correct country and whether the correct tax calculation procedure has been entered for the company code country.
Create a new tax code if necessary.
Caution:
Since it is possible that the tables in question are being updated at a different time on another computer, it can take a certain amount of time for the tax code to be on all local machines in client server architectures after saving the new code.
regards,
williamhi
go to ftxp choose tax code v0
here in first input field give 00
then select that field and click on gl acct tab
here mention a gl or go to ob40 and mention gl for the acct key of that field
try finding
Tax code country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
on SDN u will get many threads
Tax code XX country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN (MIRO Error)
conclusion is u must get acct for at least one condition in the tax code
regards
kunal -
Error while doing MIRO-Perform Plan price
Hi ,
We are on ECC 6 and we are getting error as "Perform Plan price for the material" while doing MIRO.
*Information:*
Price is different in Purchase requisition and PO&GR.MM03 is having proce control as "S" and the M Master is having both Moving price and standard price.
I tried changing the price through MR21 but still didn't worked.
Pl let me know if you need more info..
Thanks a lot in advance for early reply.
GovindHi,
Thanks for the reply. Since we are not using GR feature and we have not reversed the GR anytime.
Regards,
Lovkesh -
Purchase order Budget not reversed while doing MIRO
Hi,
Here, we are using funds management for budget analysis with update profile 350 and other setting tick on Goods Receipt only. while doing PR/PO it is coming to commitment budget. Goods Receipt no FM document created.
Strange behavior of system is , while doing MIRO system is not reversing PO budget and updated double consumed in commitment item.
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal shahHi,
If you have only GR ticked in OFUP, why would you expect MIRO to have an impact on PO's commitment? As for the fact, that GR document does not create FM posting, you have to check FM assignment of GR and make sure that commitment items are duly defined.
Regards,
Eli -
Condition for AED maintained in Migo but not showing while doing miro
Dear Experts.
Please suggest,
In PO AED conditon JMOP is not maintained, but it is maintained in the MIGO, and hence does not reflect while doing MIRO.
How can this be rectified to pass the proper entry at the time miro.
Regards,
CharmaineHi,
Check the difference of condition types you maintained in Excise defualts place.
SPRO>Logistics general >>Tax on Goods Movements>>India>>basic settings >> Detrmination of Excise duty>>Mainatin Excise defalts..
I think you missed the A/P AT1 cond type maintained in Excise defaults.
Check the scenario as per my [revous mail , that is Excise is coming or not at the time of Excise capure.
Regards,
Andra -
Region to pick based on branch vendor while doing MIRO
Dear All,
following is the scenario :
PO is created on branch vendor (with a HO vendor mentioned in master). While doing MIRO, the system automatically replaces the branch vendor with the Head office vendor (as mentioned in master). The region taken for tax purpose is the region of the HO vendor.
Now the requirement is that, while doing the MIRO, the system should pick up the region of the branch vendor and not HO vendor. Will have to create/ write an exit or use substitution.
Can somebody eleborate how should the logic be mapped for exit in connection with substitution?
Thanks,
TapanDear Alok,
Thanks for the reply. We actually already started to work on it. But, as we want to replace HO vendor with branch vendor during MIRO as already mentioned, we are still awaiting what logic should be mapped in substitution as well as exit for that.
It would be great help if you can throw some light on the same.
Thanks
Tapan -
While doing MIRO with unplaned cost system is picking accurel G/L account
Dear All,
While doing MIRO with unplaned delivery cost system is picking accural G/L account rather than cost element from PO.
Thanks
KMRHi,
It depeneds how the Unplanned Delivery Cost has been configured for the comany code.
SPRO>Material Management>LIV>Incoming Invoice>Configure Unplanned Delivery Cost.
Against Comapny Code put blank if : Unplanned delivery costs are distributed among the invoice items ( here the Materil account or the Account in the PO will be used. )
Put 2 if : Unplanned delivery costs are posted to a separate general ledger account ( here the posting key UPF will be used to determine the g/l account ).
Thanks and Regards -
While doing MIRO Tcode system is very slow
hi experts,
i am facing big problem, while doing MIRO transaction first screen it is fast after entering the P.O number then system will slow down for loading P.O line items, even scrolling or shifting to one tab strip to another tab strip also it's taking lot of time.
2 or 3 line items it was fast. if line items is more than 10 the system will goes slow. so plz anybody tell me the reason. And what i have to do.
what could be the reason for problem .(There is no abap code involved) PLZ ...
i am waiting for reply.
Murali Papana.Hi Murali,
Try to create index for the tables: BKPF, MSEG AND RBKP.
The fields involved for MSEG: lfbja, lfbnr and lfpos.
BSIP: bldat and xblnr.
RBKP: lifnr, ivtyp, repart and rbstat.
Try these and pls let me know the status if improved.
Regards,
Aditya. -
Document number 1000 100000017 2010 was already assigned while doing MIRO
HI All,
I have an issue regarding number range, while doing MIRO for third party purchase order it is saying "Document number 1000 100000017 2010 was already assigned"
my process is:
Created Sales Order, PR created automatically, converted PR to PO, done statistical GR, Billing done based on sales order ( billing document 100000017)
message no: F5152
Please let me know if somebudy get the same message and resolved it.
Thanks in advance
Nageshhello,
Go to SE16 and check tabl;e BKPF, enter thsi number in teh REF. document number field,
Else go to FBN1 and see the current number for the company code -
Delivery note of 105 while doing MIRO
Hello,
We follow 103 & 105 movement type while doing MIGO (103 for initial gate entry and 105 for final store entry).
But when we go for MIRO, as a reference document (Delivery Note), it shows document generated at the time of 103 entry.
And while doing MIRO with delivery note of Movement type 105, system does not show any line items to be invoiced.
Can anyone let me know, why system is not picking the delivery note for 105 and picking the delivery note for 103.
Thanks
Prabhjot SinghHi,
why do you want reference materials from different po during miro then?
Silas
Edited by: Silas Ngcobo on Mar 31, 2011 12:18 PM -
Facing problem while doing MIRO
Hi gurus,
I facing problem while doing MIRO, system showing the message "Customization for "company code" J_1iindcus missing in the table"
pls helpHi,
Please do customization for India Localisation-Phase-II.
In transaction J1IT, maintain company code settings.
J1IT->Global Settings->Company Settings
Reward if useful. -
Hi
I am encountering the error M8035 (" No Suitable Items found for PO ") while I am doing MIRO for the 1st time against service POs (item cat - D) in a company code.
in OMSY the period opened for the company code is : Current 06 2014 previous 05 2014
This was done because Go Live date for the new company code is 01.06.2014.
I am doing test in the test client now.
I have created a vendor on today's date
I have created a service PO on today's date (GR, GR Bsd IV, IR, Serv Bsd IV - these indicators are marked in the PO)
I have created service entry sheet on today's date (acc assignment - K, G/L a/c was determined from the Material Group maintained in the PO)
I have accepted the service entry sheet on 04.05.2014 (FI doc posted against the matl doc - KBS to WRX on 04.05.2014)
I am trying to do the MIRO in the same company code on 04.05.2014.
While I am putting the PO and its line item in MIRO item and pressing enter system shows the above info msg and nothings is appearing in MIRO item.
I have tried to do MIRO against service entry sheet also - same things happened.
I have tried selecting Goods Service Item+planned del cost in MIRO - nothing changed.
I have tried posting MIRO against a non service PO (acc assgnment K, Item cat - BLANK) after doing MIGO in the same company code in the same date- PO is appearing in that case.
FI people are able to post FB60 manually for the vendor I am using in the PO - so there is no problem in the vendor also.
I have gone through the scn post related with the topic, unfortunately none of them solved my problem.
Please help
Thanks
Sanjib...Can you post a screen shot for PO history ?
Regards
Dev -
While doing MIRO i am getting an error: Enter a tax jurisdiction code
Hi,
While doing a MIRO, i am getting an error :
Enter a tax jurisdiction code
Message no. M8757
How to Resolve
PratikHi
Try this
1.To enter the tax amounts of the G/L account items, choose Extras ® Tax amounts. The Tax Amounts screen appears.
You can branch to this screen at any point during document entry.
The Tax Amounts screen shows the tax amount, tax code, posting key, tax base amount, and jurisdiction code for all the items already entered. When you call up this screen after entering the G/L account items, it displays the amounts that have already been entered.
2.You can now choose how you want to enter the taxes.
The tax jurisdiction codes represent the different taxing authorities to which you submit payment for taxes EG: the state, county, city etc.
In SAP you can have as many as 4 levels. Configuration is done in 2 steps :
First step :
The tax jurisdiction structure (structure of the tax code) is set up with following menu path :
IMG >Financial accounting> Fi Accounting basic settings> tax on sales/purchases > basic settings > specify structure for tax jurisdiction code.
Alternatively you can use t-code OBCO
This step allows you the enter the character length of your various level of hierarchy within your tax jurisdiction code structure (State 2 char, county 3, city 4, etc...).
Second step:
You configure the tax jurisdiction code using the structure defined earlier, menu path :
IMG >Financial accounting> Fi Accounting basic settings> tax on sales/purchases > basic settings > define tax jurisdiction codes.
Alternatively t-code OBCP
Define your tax jurisdiction codes, EG GA0000000 for Georgia, GA001000 for Georgia, douglas county, GA001001 for georgia, douglas county, city of lithia springs.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is there a way to remove Exchange global address list from phone/Mail app?
I have an iPhone 5 running iOS 7.0.3. Wondering if there is a way I can prevent an Exchange global address list from loading when I compose a message. I am only syncing Mail - not contacts or calendars. Also tried dropping and re-adding account to se
-
Print to PDF in acrobat X has rights issues
Hi all, I can print a Test Page from the driver window but I can not print to PDF from Framemaker 10 originally and now IE8, word, etc. don't work too. Win 7 64 bit - We have 4 systems with this issue. I believe this maybe a rights issue. I had Disti
-
Recommendations for running Windows on Macbook with OSX Lion version 10.7.2?
I Just bought a new MacBook Pro, running Lion, version 10.7.2. I am looking to run some windows applications on my mac, including AutoCAD, etc. I would ideally like to install bootcamp on my MacBook, but from what i understand, Lion is only compatibl
-
how can an applet send variables to a JSP??
-
Open as Layers in Photoshop option does not work
I am using LR 5, and CS6 in Windows 7. PS starts to open the frames as layers, then once it gets to the last one, all of the layer disappear. HELP!!