ORA-27300-1-2 Database on Windows 2003 was hung

Hi all,
Our 11g database running on windows 2003 was hung. We bounced the database and reduced SGA_MAX_SIZE/SGA_TARGET =900M from 1200M. Problem was resolve.
SGA_MAX_SIZE/SGA_TARGET =1200M
PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET=540M
Can anyone explain meaning of below line in trace file..
Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:1659M/4095M, Ph+PgF:13745M/16166M, VA:43M/2047M
1. Was there only 1659M available on Server for Oracle.exe?
2. Or Oracle.exe was looking for 1659M and could not get that?
3. What is the possiblity adding a /3g switch would have helped (if there was just 1659M free on server for Oracle , how /3g will help)
Errors In Alert log
ORA-27300: OS system dependent operation:CreateThread failed with status: 8
ORA-27301: OS failure message: Not enough storage is available to process this command.
ORA-27302: failure occurred at: sssxcpttcs4
In Trace file
ORA-27300: OS system dependent operation:CreateThread failed with status: 8
ORA-27301: OS failure message: Not enough storage is available to process this command.
ORA-27302: failure occurred at: sssxcpttcs4
OS tid = 10208
Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:1659M/4095M, Ph+PgF:13745M/16166M, VA:43M/2047M
CPU Load: 0%
Thanks,
Anuj
Edited by: ***Anuj*** on Jul 12, 2011 2:22 PM

***Anuj*** wrote:
Hi all,
Our 11g database running on windows 2003 was hung. We bounced the database and reduced SGA_MAX_SIZE/SGA_TARGET =900M from 1200M. Problem was resolve.
SGA_MAX_SIZE/SGA_TARGET =1200M
PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET=540M
Can anyone explain meaning of below line in trace file..
Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:1659M/4095M, Ph+PgF:13745M/16166M, VA:43M/2047M
1. Was there only 1659M available on Server for Oracle.exe?
2. Or Oracle.exe was looking for 1659M and could not get that?
3. What is the possiblity adding a /3g switch would have helped (if there was just 1659M free on server for Oracle , how /3g will help)
Errors In Alert log
ORA-27300: OS system dependent operation:CreateThread failed with status: 8
ORA-27301: OS failure message: Not enough storage is available to process this command.
ORA-27302: failure occurred at: sssxcpttcs4
In Trace file
ORA-27300: OS system dependent operation:CreateThread failed with status: 8
ORA-27301: OS failure message: Not enough storage is available to process this command.
ORA-27302: failure occurred at: sssxcpttcs4
OS tid = 10208
Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:1659M/4095M, Ph+PgF:13745M/16166M, VA:43M/2047M
CPU Load: 0%
Thanks,
Anuj
Edited by: ***Anuj*** on Jul 12, 2011 2:22 PMin the past the default maximum SGA size for 32-bit Oracle was 1.7G

Similar Messages

  • How To Migrate Databases From Windows 2003 32 bit to windows 2003 64 bit?

    Hi,
    How To Migrate Databases From Windows 2003 32 bit to windows 2003 64 bit?
    Db Version: 10.2.0.2
    Thanks,
    Yusuf

    Also see MOS Doc 403522.1 (How to Migrate Oracle 10.2 32bit to 10.2 64bit on Microsoft Windows)
    HTH
    Srini

  • [b]Error in installation database in Windows 2003 server[/b]

    Hi, I have a problem. I am trying to install a database Oracle Enterprise Edition 10.1.0.2.0 in a machine that has Windows 2003 Server. On having finished the installation and begin the Database Configuration Assistant appears the error ora-12546 TNS permission denied. In the file listener.log
    the following messages appear:
    TNS-12500: TNS:listener failed to start a dedicated server process
    TNS-12546: TNS:permission denied
    TNS-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
    TNS-00516: Permission denied
    32-bit Windows Error: 5: Input/output error
    In the alert.log appear:
    OER 7451 in Load Indicator : Error Code = OSD-04500: illegal option specified O/S-Error: (OS 1) Incorrect function. !
    I install in local mode, not remote and using Administrator user.
    Help me, please!
    Regards
    Carlos

    Hello,
    There is a note in SAP that indicates that EMT64/x64 is not compatible with Oracle 9.2 (nota 12546) There is Oracle's FAQ that indicates Oracle's versions and Windows that he(she) supports EMT64.
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/windows/faq.html#x86-64
    Since you can see it(he,she) indicates that Oracle 9.2 is supported in Windows 32 bits with technology EMT64
    And that alone the version 10g 2 be reread it(he,she) is compatible with Windows 2003 SEVER 64 bits with technology EMT64
    I hope that this costs(suits) us to solve our problems
    A greeting

  • Error in installation database in Windows 2003 server 64 bits

    Hi, I have a problem. I am trying to install a database Oracle Enterprise Edition 9.2.6 in a machine that has Windows 2003 Server 64 bits
    . On having finished the installation and begin the Database Configuration Assistant appears the error ora-12546 TNS permission denied. In the file listener.log
    the following messages appear:
    TNS-12500: TNS:listener failed to start a dedicated server process
    TNS-12546: TNS:permission denied
    TNS-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
    TNS-00516: Permission denied
    32-bit Windows Error: 5: Input/output error
    I see the note 722966 and my procesador is EM64T
    I install in local mode, not remote and using Administrator user.
    Help me, please!

    Hello,
    There is a note in SAP that indicates that EMT64/x64 is not compatible with Oracle 9.2 (nota 12546) There is Oracle's FAQ that indicates Oracle's versions and Windows that he(she) supports EMT64.
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/windows/faq.html#x86-64
    Since you can see it(he,she) indicates that Oracle 9.2 is supported in Windows 32 bits with technology EMT64
    And that alone the version 10g 2 be reread it(he,she) is compatible with Windows 2003 SEVER 64 bits with technology EMT64
    I hope that this costs(suits) us to solve our problems
    A greeting

  • SQL Server Management 6.5.1.0 and 6.5.4.0 does not discovery SQL 2008 databases on Windows 2003

    SQL Server Management 6.5.1.0 and 6.5.4.0 does not discovery SQL 2008 databases on a custom instance name or when multiple SQL instances are installed on Windows 2003.
    OS Version: Windows 2203 x64 with SP2
    Database Version: 10.3.5869.0
    The instance in this case: I01 is running on port 49168.
    SQL Server Network Configuration | Protocols for I01 | IP Addresses | IPAll | TCP Port = 49168
    The DB Engine class is discovered but not the "Tcp Port" property.
    The database discovery script then fails as it is missing the 8th parameter; The Port.
    Looking at the discovery script DiscoverSQL2008DBEngineDiscovery.vbs i see the following WMI query.
    Set oWMI = GetObject("winmgmts:\\" & computerName & "\root\Microsoft\SqlServer\" & SQL_WMI_NAMESPACE)  
    Set oQuery = oWMI.ExecQuery("SELECT * FROM ServerNetworkProtocolProperty
    Using WMI Explorer if I connect to namespace: root\Microsoft\SqlServer\ComputerManagement10
    and query "SELECT * FROM ServerNetworkProtocolProperty". There are no instances.
    What am I missing or doing wrong?
    Closely related to this article. https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Hotfix-Management-Pack-SQL-17cf1118#content.
    Thanks
    Gavin

    Hi,
    I would like to know is there any update about the issue. If the issue is solved, will you please share the resolution here to help others in this forum who encounter similar issue.
    Regards,
    Yan Li
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

  • Converting a Database from Windows 2003 Server to HP-UX Itanium

    Hi
    I have to convert a database Oracle11g (11.1.0.6.0) from Windows 2003 Server to HP-UX Itanium. Both installation are in the same version. I know there are methods to convert it with RMAN ( Restore/Recover converting the database files ) or with transportable tablespaces. Can you give advices or comment me your experiencies on it ?.
    Thanks

    The RMAN's convert command is going to be needed if the endian format of both the o/s is not same. I didn't check this so please check that whether the source and target are on the same endian or not. If not, you must use the RMAN. If yes, then using transport tablespace would do the job.
    HTH
    Aman....

  • Installing Oracle9i Database on Windows 2003 Cluster

    Can anyone tell me if there are any additional steps needed to install an Oracle DB on a Windows 2003 cluster besides just running the installation and taking the defaults? I was hoping that the software would be cluster aware but it doesn't appear that it is.

    Okay,
    I have gotten a little further with this. I have my 2 node active/passive windows cluster installed and working. I also install Oracle Fail Safe and have it setup and working. I then install my Oracle9i database on node 1 using a local disk for the home directory and the DB/logs files etc on shared disk (SAN back end). I then mirrored the install on my 2nd node using the same home name and location on a local disk. What other steps do I need to take to verify that my new Oracle database will function correctly should a node fail and fail over occur. I am not familiar with any of this at all and am just trying to get to a point where I have my DB installed and working correctly within the cluster before I hand this of to another person. I guess what I am saying is I need to make sure my new DB is cluster aware and will fail over correctly. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.

  • Cloning ASM database on windows 2003.

    Guys,
    Can someone please share steps regarding cloning ASM database, I am done with creating the ASM instance on the target server and I want to create the test database from the production DB ( which is also on ASM ). OS is windows 2003 and any help is appreciated on this.
    Thanks.

    Can someone please share steps regarding cloning ASM database,Clone as you have done in the past.
    RMAN, Oracle & none of the other utilities knows or cares about underlying filesystem.

  • ORA-12546 on Windows 2003

    Hi,
    I installed Oracle 10g on Windows 2003.
    When it tried to create the database, it gave me the error ORA-12546 TNS:Permission Denied .
    Did anybody face the same problem on windows 2003 SP1?
    Any help is really appreciated.
    Regards,
    Ardalan Houshmand

    I am receiving the same error. I get to in install phase where the Database Cinfoguration Assistant tries to run and I get ora-12546. I am running windows 2003 64 bit, but am installing oracle as a 32 bit since I do not have Itanium and oracle does not have a release for 64 bit xeon. Any suggestion would really help, this new server is replacing an outdated one.

  • Problem Oracle 10g database Installation on Windows 2003 Server

    Hi All,
    I am trying to face some problem to install oracle 10g database on windows 2003 server with service pack 2. Once I start to installation it give me an error "Error in writing to directory 'c:\documents and settings\administrator\local settings\temp\orainstall2004xxx'. Please ensure that this directory is writable and has at least 45MB of disk space. Installation cannot continue"
    I double-insured that there is enough disk-space and I am also in the Administrators-Group.
    Please guide me for the above problem although I have done oracle 9i database installation with the same configuration.
    Regards
    Muhammad Shoaib

    898118 wrote:
    Hi All,
    I am trying to face some problem to install oracle 10g database on windows 2003 server with service pack 2. Once I start to installation it give me an error "Error in writing to directory 'c:\documents and settings\administrator\local settings\temp\orainstall2004xxx'. Please ensure that this directory is writable and has at least 45MB of disk space. Installation cannot continue"
    I double-insured that there is enough disk-space and I am also in the Administrators-Group.
    Please guide me for the above problem although I have done oracle 9i database installation with the same configuration.
    Regards
    Muhammad ShoaibOracle really doesn't like to be installed into directories with spaces in their names.

  • Install oracle database 9i on windows 2003 server

    I have installed a oracle 11g on windows 2003 server, but yo want install oracle 9i same machine, I can?
    exist any problem? i think that not possible

    859811 wrote:
    I have installed a oracle 11g on windows 2003 server, but yo want install oracle 9i same machine, I can?
    exist any problem? i think that not possibleOracle V9 was obsoleted & de-supported before Windows 2003 was ever released.
    It may work or it may not work.
    In any case you are solely responsible for the results.

  • Multiple ORA-27300, ORA-27301 and ORA-27302 in alert log

    Hello all,
    Looking for some guidance with a 10.2.0.1 database on Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition server. I have an SR open with Oracle, but getting the usual run-around and no conclusive explanations.
    A couple of weeks ago, the database started throwing the following in the alert log:
    Errors in file d:\oracle\admin\hdprd\bdump\hdprd_cjq0_404.trc:
    ORA-27300: OS system dependent operation:WaitForSingleObject failed with status: 0
    ORA-27301: OS failure message: The operation completed successfully.
    ORA-27302: failure occurred at: sssxcpttcs5
    Checking the trace file shows:
    *** 2011-03-22 17:37:21.391
    *** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$BACKGROUND) 2011-03-22 17:36:53.890
    *** SESSION ID:(327.1) 2011-03-22 17:36:53.890
    Waited for process J000 to initialize for 60 seconds
    *** 2011-03-22 17:37:21.391
    Dumping diagnostic information for J000:
    OS tid = 3620
    Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:6548M/8190M, Ph+PgF:10684M/12074M, VA:994M/2047M
    CPU Load: 5%
    ------------------- Call Stack Trace ---------------------
    calling location entry point arg #1 arg #2 arg #3 arg #4
    7C82847C 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    77E41A89 77E64849 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    _slxefo+154                                                      00000000                                                         00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    slxcfot+805                                                     slxefo+0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    lxlfopn+128                                                     slxcfot+0 412dd744 412dd98c 60b2c20c 60b2c208
    lxldlod+56                                                      lxlfopn+0 60b382dc 412dd98c 00000000 00000000
    _lxdlobj+79                                                      00000000                                                         60b382dc 412dd98c 0a4957f0 00000001
    lxdgetobj+187                                                   lxdlobj+0 00000001 00000000 0a49df34 00000000
    lxplset+49                                                      lxdgetobj+0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    lxhLaToId+146                                                   lxplset+0 00000001 0a49dd14 0a49df34 00000000
    lxhenvquery+197                                                 lxhLaToId+0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    lxhLangEnv+352                                                  lxhenvquery+0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    62747F74 62765084 0a49dd14 00000000 0a49df34 0a49df34
    60987803 60A35104 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    60986EEE 60986EFC 3b512c78 412df6b4 412dfd84 00000100
    6098798C 60986ED8 3b512c78 412df6b4 412dfd84 00000100
    npinli+78                                                       nlstdgo+0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    opiinit+142                                                     npinli+0 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000
    opimaireal+194 _opiinit+0                                                       00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    opimai+92                                                       opimai_real+0 00000003 412dfeec 00000000 00000000
    BackgroundThreadStart@4+422                                     opimai+0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    77E6482C 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
    ---------------- End of Call Stack Trace -----------------
    Call stack acquisition performance stats:
    setup time (lock acquis., memory alloc.): 0 ms
    frame get time (time the target proc was suspended): 0 ms
    symbol translation time: 157 ms
    total time: 157 ms
    The database remains functional while this is happening, but we are no longer able to establish new sessions to the database. The only remedy so far, as is the case with most Windows issues, is to reboot the server. The support analyst has recommended that we add the "/3gb" switch to the boot.ini as he feels we are hitting the 2GB limitation for a single process. My concern is that in looking at the trace file, it would appear that there's only around 1.6GB of memory consumed in total on the server (8190M - 6548M = 1642M), so there should be no single process that's coming even close to the 2GB limitation. I've been watching the oracle.exe process for the last week, and it always hovers around 700M. The total SGA size is about 600M.
    Interestingly enough, we're in the process of downgrading the database from Enterprise Edition to Standard edition and on the development server, we've currently got the old 10.2.0.1 EE database and the new 10.2.0.5 SE database running concurrently. The EE version has encountered the same issue described above, while the SE version has not.
    My other problem is that I work in the pharmaceutical industry and this is a heavily regulated database and I cannot make arbitrary changes to databases/servers without evidence to support the change.
    Any Oracle/Windows experts out there that can shed some light on this problem?
    Thanks

    Thanks to both of you for the speedy response. I have already seen that article, as well as 790397.1 - PROCESS J000 And M000 Die [ID 790397.1]. I'm just a little confused as to why Oracle is saying it's an out of memory condition when there's nothing in the log or trace files (other than the condition matches a couple of articles they have) that support the conclusion. Don't get me wrong, I'm certainly not an Oracle on Windows expert, most of my stuff revolves around Linux/UNIX and I avoid anything windows like the plague, other than starting a putty session.
    My understanding is that each process in a windows 32bit environment gets a 4GB Virtual Address Space, which is split into a lower 2GB application space and an upper 2GB kernel space. If the trace file is showing that only 1.6GB of physical memory has been consumed, wouldn't this indicate that there isn't a single process on the server that is even close to reaching it's 2GB limitation?

  • The old allowing oracle 3GB virtual memory on windows 2003 server question?

    Hi all,
    I have a 9.2.0.7.0 database on windows 2003 server (32bit). 4 dual core cpu's and 16GB of Ram.
    I have set .use_indirect_data_buffers=TRUE and *._enable_NUMA_optimization=FALSE.
    The db_block_buffers is set at 4GB.
    Shared_pool 200MB
    Large_pool 56MB
    Java pool 56MB
    PGA is currently at 400MB
    AWE_WINDOW_MEMORY is set at 720MB (which is the lowest I can set it)
    At the moment there are various jobs running on the database and no users logged on and the virtual memory is at 1.8GB.
    The problem is as soon as the users logs onto the DB the virtual memory goes over 2GB and we see the error 'ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 2416 bytes'.
    Now I have edited the boot.ini with the following parameters:
    multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT="UBS WSP - Wintel Server Platform with PAE" /fastdetect /PAE /4GT
    because the /3GB parameter switch started the server with lots of errors.
    The oracle.exe process still seems unable to go over the 2GB limit with getting 'ORA-04030' errors.
    Can someone tell me if I have missed anything? Or a reason why oracle is not using the switch?
    TIA
    Eddy

    Satish,
    see metalink Note:1036312.6 : Utilizing Up to 3GB Virtual Memory on Windows.
    it says :
    "The 32-bit versions of the Windows® 2000 Advanced Server and Windows NT Server 4.0, Enterprise Edition, operating systems were the first versions of Windows to provide applications with a 3-GB flat virtual address space, with the kernel and executive components using only 1 GB. In response to customer requests, Microsoft has expanded the availability of this support to the 32-bit version of Windows XP Professional and all 32-bit versions of Windows Server™ 2003."
    of course, we mustn't be mistaken with the AWE switch (/PAE) that is not available for standard edition.
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291988 ==> tells more about what can be supported
    regards,
    marc

  • Installing oracle 9i database in windows x 64 bit version

    Friends, I face difficulties in installing oracle 9i database in windows x 64 bit version 2003 server. The same had worked well with 32 bit version. I could install database and work in the same system in command prompt but the same could not be connected from sqlplus moreover DPCA,Netconfiguaration assistant all are not coming in the graphical way and i couldnt able to connect from the network. which brings ora-06413 error.
    please help me to get installed oracle 9i database in windows 2003 server 64 bit version.

    Go Through Below link
    >>>http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/oracle9i/index.html

  • Space Problem in G: - after NW2004s SR1 installation on Windows 2003 server

    HI Friends,
    I have installed NW2004s SR1 on Windows 2003 server with Oracle 10g database successfully. My server has sufficient harddisk space as follows.
    C: 9.6GB
    G: 24GB
    H:64GB & I: 73GB.
    RAM is 6GB
    While installing NW2004s i have defined a paging size on C: 400MB-1600MB and
    i have set the option as System Manageble on other drives G, H& I drives. I did not get any Swap space problem while installing.
    During installation I have chosen G: drive to store MirrorlogA, MirrorlogB, Oraarch, OriglogA, OriglogB folders of Oracle for redolog archives,.Total size of all these folders is 17.4 GB
    G: drive has one more folder Program files which is of 155KB  and no other files exist in it.
    But My system says that I am running out of Space on G: drive and free space available now is only 44MB.
    My question is where has the rest 5GB of space gone? Is it consumed as a part of Paging file which i have set on this drive as System manageble??
    I have set the same option on other drives too i..e H & I. But i am not facing any space issues for these drives.
    What could be going wrong?? Please suggest me how to correct this
    Thanks
    mv_d

    898118 wrote:
    Hi All,
    I am trying to face some problem to install oracle 10g database on windows 2003 server with service pack 2. Once I start to installation it give me an error "Error in writing to directory 'c:\documents and settings\administrator\local settings\temp\orainstall2004xxx'. Please ensure that this directory is writable and has at least 45MB of disk space. Installation cannot continue"
    I double-insured that there is enough disk-space and I am also in the Administrators-Group.
    Please guide me for the above problem although I have done oracle 9i database installation with the same configuration.
    Regards
    Muhammad ShoaibOracle really doesn't like to be installed into directories with spaces in their names.

Maybe you are looking for