Oracle 8.1.6, slow performance using XSU

Hi,
We have a problem with some queries running in our production environment. When we run them directly through sqlplus they take milliseconds, however when we pass them through our wrapper to the XSU, they can take 5 or 6 seconds to return. The type of query just involves reading data from the database and returning it in XML through the XSU. The wrapper procedure we have written is shown below. Some of the XML we get back can be quite big, hence the check on the return length, but nothing greater than this length will normally be passed through the XSU. We have no issues with indexes etc, as I say the queries run fast if we don't process them through the XSU.
We beleive that the problems may be exaggerated by the load on the database at any time, and are going to investigate this further in the production environment when we get a chance but at the moment we are a bit stumped.
Does anyone have an idea why we are experiencing such large overheads when going through the XSU? Is there anything in our wrapper procedure which could add to the delay? Would introducing bind variables into our queries help? Any advice much appreciated.
PROCEDURE XML_Query(p_SQL IN VARCHAR2,
p_XML OUT LONG) IS
     v_Context          DBMS_XMLQuery.ctxType;
     v_CLOB      CLOB;
     v_Length          INTEGER;
     v_Buffer          VARCHAR2(2767);
     v_Amount          BINARY_INTEGER := 30000;
     v_Offset          INTEGER := 1;
     e_OutputTooLarge     EXCEPTION;
BEGIN
     --Get the query context
     v_Context := DBMS_XMLQuery.newContext(p_SQL);
     --v_Context := DBMS_XMLQuery.newContext('SELECT * FROM COLL_SCHEME');
     --Set the date format
     DBMS_XMLQuery.setDateFormat(v_Context,'dd/MM/yyyy hh:mm:ss');
     --Get the XML result
     v_CLOB := DBMS_XMLQuery.getXML(v_Context);
     --Check the length of the result
     v_Length := DBMS_LOB.GETLENGTH(v_CLOB);
     --We currently have a 32767 character limit
     IF v_Length > 32767 THEN
          --Close the context
          DBMS_XMLQuery.closeContext(v_Context);
          --Raise exception
          RAISE e_OutputTooLarge;
     END IF;
     --The first output is always the XML header <?xml version = '1.0'?>
     --We dont want it, so set the Offset to 24 to skip it
     v_Offset := 24;
     --Read the result into the output parameter (max 30000 chars at a time)
     DBMS_LOB.READ(v_CLOB,v_Amount,v_Offset,p_XML);
     --If there is more, get the remaining chars (up to another 2767)
     IF v_Length > 30000 THEN
          v_Amount := 2767;
          DBMS_LOB.READ(v_CLOB,v_Amount,30000,v_Buffer);
          p_XML := p_XML || v_Buffer;
     END IF;
     --Close the context
     DBMS_XMLQuery.closeContext(v_Context);
EXCEPTION
     WHEN e_OutputTooLarge THEN
          -- Raise the error to the calling process
          RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20000,'XML output to large. (' || TO_CHAR(v_Length) || ')');
END XML_Query;

Thanks Justin. I tried what you suggested. Here's the findings:
1. increase prefetch count -- did not seem to make a significant difference;
2. tried MicroSoft ODBC driver -- See to be a little quicker, but still way slower than native SQLnet or Net8;
3. Use Oracle ODBC test instead of application -- Oracle ODBC test seem to restrict the max row retrieval to 100 rows -- but it still take 10 to 20 seconds, which means for 800 rows it will take the same amount of time. I checked the NT taskmanager, while retieving data there's no CPU consumption.
4. Installed Oracle to another machine in the same location on NT/wintel box. Response time ODBC vs SQLnet is comparable (50 msec or so) on 200 rows data retrieval. The production database is in DEC alpha machine running NT.
Based on all these testing, I am still not sure what might have caused the performance problem in production oracle. Any further suggestions?
null

Similar Messages

  • Slow performance using "NOT" operator

    Hello,
    We are experiencing extremely poor performance using the "not" operator as follows:
    AND contains(product.mycontextindex, '(music & rock) ~ hip', 1) > 0
    This query may take up to two minutes whereas eliminating the "~ hip" text will complete in 3-4 seconds. The index is fairly large. Is this a common problem for Oracle Text? Is there anything we can do to speed up the query?
    Thanks in advance.
    David.

    We are using 9i (9.2 I believe). The problem was much worse with 8i. Queries would not even return. 9i, however, hasn't really made the performance acceptable.

  • Slow performance using getBlob(), how can I correct this ?

    I have wav files stored in a database that range from 10M - 75M... When I make a JDBC call using ResultSet..ie a rs.getBlob for a large wav file, the performance is terribly slow. How can I improve this ? Is there a way to get the BLob is pieces or sections ?

    Hi. Thanks for you response.
    You are correct. I believe the code is not slow when running the result.getBlob funciton is called, it must be when I stream it to the audio player. The point where it becomes slow is when I try and play it. After clicking play the song starts about 15 seconds later.
    Here is my code:
    PreparedStatement stmt = conn.prepareStatement(select);
                   ResultSet result = stmt.executeQuery();
                   while( result.next() ) {
                        blob = result.getBlob(type);
                   result.close();
                   stmt.close();
                   result = null;
    InputStream is = blob.getBinaryStream();
                   SourceDataLine line;
              AudioInputStream stream = AudioSystem.getAudioInputStream(is);

  • Suse linux - oracle 8.1.7 - slow performance

    we made some test with linux and oracle 8i and these are the results:
    1. 800MHz, EIDE 18GB
    import 08:30
    copy of file (1x420MB) 03:25
    export (dump 28MB) 00:18
    2. 400MHz, SCSI ?GB
    import 35:00
    copy of file (1x420MB) 01:40
    export (dump 28MB) 00:43
    3. dual-proz, hardware-RAID5
    import 36:30
    copy (1x420MB) 01:10
    export ??:??
    can somebody explain this to me. for IDE drives we found out that it's possible to perform them with hdparm. but there exists nothing simillary for scsi drives. i hope anybody can help me. please answer also to [email protected]
    thanks in advance.

    It's the same binary with OPS included. You'll still need the compat libraries. No big deal though.

  • Very Slow Performance using Word

    Wondering if you can offer any advice on how to troubleshoot a problem
    I have with a G3 iBook. Just recently I have been having problems
    with Word (but only Word). It takes forever to open and forever to
    complete any command (eg open a document)- basically it hangs the machine for a few miniutes each time. The iBook is running OS X 10.2.8.
    This is a recent problem that has come out of nowhere seemingly - i.e.
    Word was working fine until a few weeks ago. Nothing has been
    installed etc that would change the computer, to my knowledge. I have
    been running Process Viewer when I open Word and it
    shows that Word is using about 50% of the RAM (she has 256MB) when it
    is "hanging". I also have an iMac with a very similar configuration (G3, same
    OS, actually less RAM (192MB), same MS Word installation) and Word runs
    fine on the iMac with Process Viewer showing only about 10% of RAM
    usage.
    Do you have any suggestions as to how I can troubleshoot this / find
    the problem / clean things up to restore Word performance?
    Thanks

    tr61:
    Welcome to Apple Discussions.
    Try this:
    • Shut down the computer.
    • Locate the following keys: Command, Option, P, and R. You will need to hold these keys down simultaneously later.
    • Turn on the computer.
    • Press and hold the Command + Option + P + R keys immediately after the startup chime.
    • Hold keys down until you hear the startup chime for the third time.
    • Release the keys and immediately hold down Shift key to start up in Safe Mode.
    • Log in and empty Trash (if any).
    • Restart normally and log in.
    Please post back with update or further questions or comments.
    Cheers
    cornelius

  • OCFS slow performance in ImpDP

    Did anyone encounter slow performance using ImpDP on OCFS ? We have Oracle RAC 10.2g running in window connecting SAN storage and was formatted to OCFS. We compared the performance of running the same import in Local Drive (NTFS) and SAN storage (OCFS) and found that the time required to complete the import is 10 times than Local Drive (NTFS). Any tuning or troubleshooting that we could do ? Thanks in Advance.

    Not aware of ocfs installing automatically when installing CRS/RAC. But then have never used Windows as a production o/s for Oracle. never mind using it to run RAC.
    ocfs2 is the latest version as per Oracle's [Open Source project list|http://oss.oracle.com/projects/]. Am not aware of "ocfs 9" for 9i or "ocfs 10" for 10g on Windows.
    What do you use ocfs for? Do you have the OCR and voting disks on the file system as files? Do you use it for Oracle datafiles too?
    As for the SAN infrastructure being "+okay+" - there's more than that to it. You need some kind of driver on the o/s to interface with the HBA card.. where cables (dual 2Gb fibre?) run into a SAN switch and where the SAN switch is connected to the physical storage system.
    A faulty cable can cause performance issue (e.g. reducing the dual path to the SAN via 2 fibre channels to a single one). There could be errors on the switch. The driver could be problematic (older version). Etc.
    So there is a number of layers, both s/w and h/w, to check before going "+okay+". Trust that your infrastructure team is jacked up in this regard.
    One method to benchmark the import problem is to use NT's performance monitor and monitor the import process. Not exactly sure how you would do it dealing with threads (as a thread in the oracle.exe executable will be servicing the import process) - but this should give you a somewhat accurate figure of the I/Os per second and bytes and blocks per second that the process is reading from the ocfs file system (assuming that you are writing it via ASM to raw devices).
    At the same time you can monitor the process for other potential performance bottlenecks.
    The only other factor that comes to mind that can impact ocfs performance is the ocfs cluster's communication layer. Like CRS that uses Interconnect for communication between nodes, so does ocfs. On a Unix system this is configured in the +/etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf+ file - and lists the number of ocfs nodes in the cluster and the network interfaces/addresses used for communication.
    If this network layer is already quite busy, using it for ocfs2's cluster communication could be a problem performance wise.
    You can test this aspect by unmounting ocfs2 (and stopping the ocfs2 cluster communication/heartbeat s/w too) on all but one node and then running the import. As there is only a single node in the ocfs2 cluster, the communication with other nodes is pretty much made redundant.
    Last comment - ocfs2 is not slow as a cluster file system. It does a pretty decent job. And its performance is directly related to the h/w it runs on, and also how it is configured. That said, it is not a s/w component that really plays a role in Oracle CRS and RAC as ASM should be used (and is the recommended option from Oracle). ocfs2 at best can serve as a cooked file system for the RAC cluster (only used via directory objects in Oracle).

  • Slow performance in W2K using Oracle ODBC Driver

    My company is upgrading our NT4 servers to W2K. One or our App servers is running MTS with several packages, one of those being a dataaccess package that is responsible for all data actions.
    In testing the OS upgrade, I found considerable performance degradation with our data access package. I finally solved the problem by changing the ODBC driver from Oracle ODBC Driver to the Microsoft ODBC for Oracle Driver. I have also found that under XP, I can still retain the use of the Oracle ODBC Driver without any performance hits.
    All systems currently have the 8.1.7 Oracle Client and MDAC 2.7. I have also tried the Oracle Objects for OLE with similar performance losses in W2K.
    More info about the problem...
    In using the Oracle ODBC Driver, I connect this way -
    Dim RS As ADOR.Recordset
    Set RS = CreateObject("ADOR.Recordset")
    RS.ActiveConnection = "DSN=" & p_strDSN & ";" & "uid=" & strUser & ";pwd=" & strPassword & ";"
    RS.Source = "Select stuff from aTable"
    RS.LockType = adLockReadOnly
    RS.Open
    Using W2K, I found that the majority of processing time comes from the RS.ActiveConnection call, not from object creation.
    I would like to use an Oracle developed driver to connect to my database, however, I am forced to use the Microsoft driver. I have not seen any similar problem on this message board, nor have I seen any mention of this in MSDN's discussion board. Can anyone shed some light on what is going on?
    Thanks,
    Matt

    The performance lag we have been seeing is in the milliseconds, but when we make repeated calls, those milliseconds add up. I am seeing a difference of about 7 - 10 milliseconds each call between the Oracle ODBC Driver and the Microsoft driver.
    TNSPings seem quick in all setups as does the connection tests.
    The Oracle ODBC driver version is 8.01.07.00. I haven't tried the new 8.01.07.6+ drivers yet. I'll give them a shot and reply back with results in a day or so.

  • How to get comparable Oracle JDBC performance using Java 1.4 vs 1.1.7?

    Our application makes extensive use of JDBC to access an Oracle database. We wrote it a number of years ago using java 1.1.7 and we have been unable to move to new versions of java because of the performance degradation.
    I traced the problem to JDBC calls. I can reproduce the problem using a simple program that simply connects to the database, executes a simple query and then reads the data. The same program running under java 1.4 is about 60% slower than under java 1.1.7. The query is about 80% slower and getting the data is about 150% slower!
    The program is attached below. Note, I run the steps twice as the first time the times are much larger which I attribute to java doing some initializations. So the second set of values I think are more representative of the actual performance in our application where there are numerous accesses to the database. Specifically, I focus on step 4 which is the execute query command and step 5 which is the data retrieval step. The table being read has 4 columns with 170 tuples in it.
    Here are the timings I get when I run this on a Sparc Ultra 5 running
    SunOs 5.8 using an Oracle database running 8.1.7:
                     java 1.1.7  java 1.4
            overall:    2.1s         3.5s
            step 1:     30           200
            step 2:    886          2009
            step 3:      2             2
            step 4:      9            17
            step 5:    122           187
            step 6:      1             1
            step 1:      0             0
            step 2:    203           161
            step 3:      0             1
            step 4:      8            15   <-   87% slower
            step 5:     48           117   <-  143% slower
            step 6:      1             2I find the same poor performance from java versions 1.2 and 1.3.
    I tried using DataDirect's type 4 JDBC driver which gives a little better performance but overall it is still much slower than using java 1.1.7.
    Why do the newer versions of java have such poor performance when using JDBC?
    What can be done so that we can have performance similar to java 1.1.7
    using java 1.4?
    ========================================================================
    import java.util.*;
    import java.io.*;
    import java.sql.*;
    public class test12 {
        public static void main(String args[]) {
            try {
                    long time1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
    /* step 1 */  DriverManager.registerDriver(
                        new oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver());
                    long time2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
    /* step 2 */  Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection (
                  "jdbc:oracle:thin:@dbserver1:1521:db1","user1","passwd1");
                    long time3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
    /* step 3 */  Statement stmt = conn.createStatement();
                    long time4 = System.currentTimeMillis();
    /* step 4 */  ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from table1");
                    long time5 = System.currentTimeMillis();
    /* step 5 */  while( rs.next() ) {
                      int message_num = rs.getInt(1);
                      String message = rs.getString(2);
                    long time6 = System.currentTimeMillis();
    /* step 6 */  rs.close(); stmt.close();
                    long time7 = System.currentTimeMillis();
                System.out.println("step 1: " + (time2 - time1) );
                System.out.println("step 2: " + (time3 - time2) );
                System.out.println("step 3: " + (time4 - time3) );
                System.out.println("step 4: " + (time5 - time4) );
                System.out.println("step 5: " + (time6 - time5) );
                System.out.println("step 6: " + (time7 - time6) );
                System.out.flush();
            } catch ( Exception e ) {
                System.out.println( "got exception: " + e.getMessage() );
            ... repeat the same 6 steps again...
    }

    If I run my sample program with the -server option, it
    takes a lot longer (6.8s vs 3.5s).Which has to be expected, as the -server option optimizes for long running programs - so it shoudl go with my second suggestion, more below...
    I am not certain what you mean by "just let the jvm
    running". Our users issue a command (in Unix) which
    invokes one of our java programs to access or update
    data in a database. I think what you are suggesting
    would require that I rewrite our application to have a
    java program always running on the users workstation
    and to also rewrite our
    commands (over a hundred) to some how pass data and
    receive data with this new server java program. That
    does not seem a very reasonable just to move to a new
    version of java. Or are you suggesting something
    else?No I was just suggestion what you descript. But if this is not an option, then maybe you should merge your java-programs to C or another native language. Or you could try the IBM-JDK with the -faststart (or similar) option. If thew Unix you mention is AIX, then there would be the option of a resetable-vm. But I cannot say if this VM would solve your problem. Java is definitly not good for applications which only issue some unqiue commands because the hotspot-compiler can not be efficiently used there. You can only try to get 1.1.7 performance by experimenting with vm-parameters (execute java -X).

  • First off, i think it's sad that i have to use my non apple device to post this question... Why has my iPad become absolutely useless after updating to iOS 8.1? I am unable to use my mini because it crashes, slow performance, major battery drain.

    First off, i think it's sad that i have to use my non apple device to post this question... Why has my iPad become absolutely useless after updating to iOS 8.1? I am unable to use my mini because it crashes, slow performance, major battery drain.

    Restore iPad to Factory Default; do not restore from backup. It may be the cause of the problem.
    Settings>General>Reset>Erase all content and settings

  • Converting Oracle XML Query Result in Java String by using XSU

    Hi,
    I have a problem by converting Oracle XML Query Result in Java
    String by using XSU. I use XSU for Java.
    For example:
    String datum=new OracleXMLQuery(conn,"Select max(ps.datum) from
    preise ps where match='"+args[0]+"'");
    String datum1=datum;
    I become the following error:
    Prototyp.java:47: Incompatible type for declaration. Can't
    convert oracle.xml.sql.query.OracleXMLQuery to java.lang.String.
    Can somebody tell me a method() for converting to solve my
    problem??????
    Thanks

    Hmmm.. Pretty basic just look at the example:
    OracleXMLQuery qry = new OracleXMLQuery(conn,"Select max(ps.datum) from preise ps where match='"+args[0]+"'");
    String xmlString = qry.getXMLString();
    Hi,
    I have a problem by converting Oracle XML Query Result in Java
    String by using XSU. I use XSU for Java.
    For example:
    String datum=new OracleXMLQuery(conn,"Select max(ps.datum) from
    preise ps where match='"+args[0]+"'");
    String datum1=datum;
    I become the following error:
    Prototyp.java:47: Incompatible type for declaration. Can't
    convert oracle.xml.sql.query.OracleXMLQuery to java.lang.String.
    Can somebody tell me a method() for converting to solve my
    problem??????
    Thanks

  • Oracle Collaboration Suite Slow Performance

    Hi,
    I have encountered with problem with OCS 10.1.2 with following information:
    Hardware : DL-380G5
    Operating System : OEL 4 update 5 64 bit
    Oracle Product : Collaboration Suite 10.1.2
    The installation has been done in three server as follow:
    Server 1: Application Tier (OCS component such as mail, calendar , discussion , ...)
    Server 2: Infrastructure (Oracle Single Sign on)
    Server 3 : Infrastructure (Oracle Internet Directory)
    Patch Information : Cumulative Patch 10.1.2.4 (Note: 406284.1) + Mandatory Patch after 10.1.2.4 ( Note:
    423515.1) + Patch 10.1.0.5 on Infrastructure layer
    have been applied on Application tier and Infrastructure.
    Problem_ Everything goes well after reboot of all 3 servers and refresh but after 2 hours nobody can
    connect to OCS services due to slow performance
    Only restarting the servers cause the users can connect to OCS services again.
    Any Idea will be appreciated.
    Edited by: Oralinux on Oct 29, 2009 5:08 PM

    Did you ever find out why this was happening? We seemed to have developed a similar issue and we have had a Severity 1 level SR for 4 days now and no one seems to able to work it out.
    cheers
    paul

  • Extremely slow performance on projects under version control using RoboHelp 11, PushOk, Tortoise SVN repository

    We are also experiencing extremely slow performance for RoboHelp projects under version control. We are using RoboHelp 11, PushOk and a Tortoise SVN repository on a Linux server. We are using a Linux server on our IT guys advice because we found SVN version control under Windows was unstable.
    When placing a Robohelp project under version control, and yes the project is on my local machine, it can take up to two hours to complete. We are using the RoboHelp sample projects to test.
    We have tried to put the project under version control from Robohelp, and also tried first putting the project under version control from Tortoise SVN, and then trying to open the project from version control in Robohelp. In both cases, the project takes a ridiculous amount of time to open. The Robohelp status bar displays Querying Version Control Status for about an hour before it starts to download from the repository, which then takes more than an hour to complete. In many cases Robohelp becomes unresponsive and we have to start the whole process again.
    If adding the project to source control completes successfully, and the the project is opened from version control, performing any function also takes a very long time, such as creating a topic. When I generated a printed documentation layout it took an astonishing 218 minutes and 17 seconds to complete. Interestingly, when I generated the printed documentation layout again, it took 1 min and 34 seconds. However when I closed the project, opened from version control, and tried to generate a printed documentation layout, it again took several hours to complete. The IT guys are at a loss, and say it is not a network issue and I am starting to agree that this is a RoboHelp issue.
    I see there are a few other discussions here related to this kind of poor performance, none of which seem to been answered satisfactorily. For example:
    Why does it take so long when adding a new topic in RH10 with PushOK SVN
    Does anybody have any ideas on what we can do or what we can investigate? I know that there are options for version control, but am reluctant to pursue them until I am satisfied that our current issues cannot be resolved.
    Thanks Mark

    Do other applications work fine with the source control repository? The reason I'm asking is because you must first rule out that there are external factors causing this behaviour. It seems that your it guys have already looked at it, but it's better to be safe than sorry.
    I have used both VSS and TFS and I haven't encountered such a performance issue. I would suggest filing it as a bug if you rule out that the problem is not related to external influences: https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform&loc=en
    Kind regards,
    Willam

  • My Mac has been suffering a slow performance, lagging and often froze. One source recommends using Onyx. Is that a trustable source?

    I have a Macbook Pro OS X Version 10.9.4. Processor speed of 2.3 GHz Intel Core i5, memory of 4 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 and storage capacity of 203.51 GB out of 319.21 GB. I have been experiencing very slow performance and sometimes the screen will froze. The spinning wheel is very common and long. I have try to delete as many things as i could from my computer, restarting it but to no avail. One source suggests me to use Onyx. Would that help to solve my problem?

    EtreCheck version: 1.9.15 (52)
    Report generated September 29, 2014 at 7:55:53 PM EDT
    Hardware Information: ?
      MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011) (Verified)
      MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro8,1
      1 2.3 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 2 cores
      4 GB RAM
    Video Information: ?
      Intel HD Graphics 3000 - VRAM: 384 MB
      Color LCD 1280 x 800
    System Software: ?
      OS X 10.9.5 (13F34) - Uptime: 0 days 0:15:5
    Disk Information: ?
      ST9320325ASG disk0 : (320.07 GB)
      S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
      EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
      Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 319.21 GB (205.02 GB free)
      Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
      MATSHITADVD-R   UJ-8A8 
    USB Information: ?
      Apple Inc. BRCM2070 Hub
      Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
      Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
      Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
      Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
    Thunderbolt Information: ?
      Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
    Gatekeeper: ?
      Mac App Store and identified developers
    Kernel Extensions: ?
      [loaded] com.symantec.kext.SymAPComm (12.2f1 - SDK 10.6) Support
      [loaded] com.symantec.kext.internetSecurity (5.2f1 - SDK 10.6) Support
      [loaded] com.symantec.kext.ips (3.5f1 - SDK 10.6) Support
      [loaded] com.symantec.kext.ndcengine (1.0f1 - SDK 10.6) Support
    Launch Daemons: ?
      [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
      [loaded] com.cloudpath.maccmd.plist Support
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.daemon.plist Support
      [loaded] com.symantec.liveupdate.daemon.ondemand.plist Support
      [failed] com.symantec.liveupdate.daemon.plist Support
      [not loaded] com.symantec.sep.migratesettings.plist Support
      [running] com.symantec.sharedsettings.plist Support
      [running] com.symantec.symdaemon.plist Support
    Launch Agents: ?
      [not loaded] com.cooliris.SetLaunchArch.plist Support
      [loaded] com.divx.dms.agent.plist Support
      [loaded] com.divx.update.agent.plist Support
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
      [running] com.symantec.uiagent.application.plist Support
    User Launch Agents: ?
      [failed] com.apple.CSConfigDotMacCert-[...]@me.com-SharedServices.Agent.plist
      [loaded] com.divx.agent.postinstall.plist Support
      [loaded] com.facebook.videochat.[redacted].plist Support
      [failed] com.hitachigst.backup.agent.plist Support
      [running] com.spotify.webhelper.plist Support
    User Login Items: ?
      Google Drive
      SpeechSynthesisServer
      Popup
      Notify
    Internet Plug-ins: ?
      o1dbrowserplugin: Version: 5.4.2.18903 Support
      OVSHelper: Version: 1.1 Support
      Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
      Flip4Mac WMV Plugin: Version: 3.2.0.16   - SDK 10.8 Support
      DivX Plus Web Player: Version: 2.4 - SDK 10.5 Support
      CoolirisWebKitPlugin: Version: (null) Support
      Silverlight: Version: 5.1.10411.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
      FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 15.0.0.152 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Flash Player: Version: 15.0.0.152 - SDK 10.6 Support
      QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
      googletalkbrowserplugin: Version: 5.4.2.18903 Support
      JavaAppletPlugin: Version: 14.9.0 - SDK 10.7 Check version
    Safari Extensions: ?
      Add To Amazon Wish List
    Audio Plug-ins: ?
      BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
      AirPlay: Version: 2.0 - SDK 10.9
      AppleAVBAudio: Version: 203.2 - SDK 10.9
      iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
    iTunes Plug-ins: ?
      Quartz Composer Visualizer: Version: 1.4 - SDK 10.9
    3rd Party Preference Panes: ?
      Flash Player  Support
      Flip4Mac WMV  Support
      Symantec QuickMenu  Support
    Time Machine: ?
      Time Machine not configured!
    Top Processes by CPU: ?
          3% WindowServer
          1% fontd
          1% Google Drive
          0% com.apple.WebKit.Networking
          0% systemstatsd
    Top Processes by Memory: ?
      258 MB SymDaemon
      127 MB mds_stores
      86 MB com.apple.IconServicesAgent
      82 MB Google Drive
      78 MB Mail
    Virtual Memory Information: ?
      923 MB Free RAM
      1.53 GB Active RAM
      656 MB Inactive RAM
      953 MB Wired RAM
      311 MB Page-ins
      0 B Page-outs

  • Slow performance for large queries

    Hi -
    I'm experiencing slow performance when I use a filter with a very large OR clause.
    I have a list of users, whose uid's are known, and I want to retrieve attributes for all users. If I do this one at a time, I pay the network overhead, and this becomes a bottleneck. However, if I try to get information about all users at once, the query runs ridiculously slow - ~ 10minutes for 5000 users.
    The syntax of my filter is: (|(uid=user1)(uid=user2)(uid=user3)(uid=user4).....(uid=user5000))
    I'm trying this technique because it's similar to good design for oracle - minimizing round trips to the database.
    I'm running LDAP 4.1.1 on a Tru64 OS - v5.1.

    This is a performance/tuning forum for iPlanet Application Server. You'd have better luck with this question on the Directory forum.
    The directory folks don't have a separate forum dedicated to tuning, but they answer performance questions in the main forum all of the time.
    David

  • Oracle database is very slow and hangs sometime

    I am using Oracle 11g on Red hat 5.2 . My RAM is of 6 GB and swap size is 12GB . When I checked the used RAM and Swap area by using $ free -m command it shows that enough free memory (almost 4990 GB and swap space (more than 10GB) is available to use. Then I checked an alert.log file as my database was hanged . It contains error like
    1. audit commit delay exceeded oracle
    2. unable to spawn jobq slave process oracle
    3. maximum number of sessions exceeded
    4. could not allocate new resource
    My init.ora contains following parameters.
    Processes =150
    Sessions= 248
    Transactions = 220
    memory_target = 2400m
    sga_max_size = 1500m
    sga_target = 0m
    So, what steps i should take to stop database hanging and how can i boost slow performance ? Is there any problem with my resource manager and if so then how can i correct it?
    Thanks
    Tushar Lapani

    Hi,
    Please check the query
    SELECT username,default_tablespace from dba_users;
    Ususally the default tablespace of the user should not be in SYSTEM tablespace. This might cause performance issue. Create a seperate tablespace and alter/assign this user. Also must move all the objects from SYSTEM tablespace to this new tablespace which you created.
    For complete details, you can refer the document http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10752.pdf

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can a portable USB 3.0 HDD be partitioned and formatted FAT32 and Mac OS Extended?

    I wish to use a portable HDD on a Windows laptop and also my iMac. I realise that if I format it as FAT32 it will work on both. Unfortunately I also need it to work with Final Cut Pro X  .  .  .  but FCP X can only recognise Mac OS Extended drives. S

  • Mail, Contacts & Calendar Bug

    Hi, I think I've found a bug in the Mail, Contacts and Calendars preference panel in Mountain Lion. I have an email account that was originally created through Mail.app. The email account has a username (e.g. [email protected]) that is different from

  • OC4J CMP lazy-loading failure

    Hi,<br> Been looking at the latest production release of oc4j and have been playing with the demo cmp ejb program provided by the download (dir : \j2ee\homedemo\ejb\cmp). I've also installed p6Spy to see the SQL commands sent to the database by the c

  • Pacman and security

    A better packet system with security. Twoday all mirrors distrubute a file with all checksums for the mirror, witch can be used to werify that the packet isent corupted in transfer. The security problem her is that if a packet is replaced, whith a ba

  • Equipments to be calibrated

    Dear Experts, My client wants its equipment to be calibrated in house. In equipment we have tab (specification) under which range and other parameter to be captured is configured through class. Now I have created order for that particular equipment.