Oracle 8i -multiple LEFT OUTER JOIN
Hi,
I have to convert some stored procedure from Sql Server to Oracle 8i where I have multiple LEFT OUTER JOIN on a table. Because Oracle 8i accept only one outer join on a table how can I convert this:
select a.id, b.id
from test as a LEFT JOIN test1 b ON a.id(+)=b.id
and a.display(+)=b.display
and a.name(+)='Done';
Thanks.
FROM test a LEFT JOIN test1 b ON b.key = a.keyis equivalent to
FROM test a, test1 b WHERE b.key(+) = a.keyThere is a restriction (when using the "(+)" syntax) that a table may be outer-joined to at most one other table, but that does not prevent you from having multiple join conditions between those two tables.
From your example I'm not sure whether you need this:
SELECT a.id, b.id
FROM test a
, test1 b
WHERE a.name = 'Done'
AND b.id (+)= a.id
AND b.display (+)= a.display;or this:
SELECT a.id, b.id
FROM test1 b
, test a
WHERE a.id (+)= b.id
AND a.display (+)= b.display;
WHERE a.name (+)= 'Done';
Similar Messages
-
Multiple LEFT OUTER JOIN on Oracle 8i
Hi,
I have to convert some stored procedure from Sql Server to Oracle 8i where I have multiple LEFT OUTER JOIN on a table. Because Oracle 8i accept only one outer join on a table how can I convert this:
select a.id, b.id
from test as a LEFT JOIN test1 b ON a.id(+)=b.id
and c.display(+)=b.display
and c.name(+)='Done';
Thanks.Rewrite as:
select a.id, b.id
from test, test1 b
WHERE a.id(+)=b.id
and a.display(+)=b.display
and a.name(+)='Done';
Though I would lose the (+) in a.name(+) = 'Done' unless you want every name. -
Multiple left outer join in single select query
My client requires to apply multiple left outer join in single select query.
Tell me how it is possible . tell me if we can use native sql query.HI vineet,
Using multile left join is possible but it reduce performance as it takes a long time to retrieve data.
The following code would help you in knowing how to use multiple left join
REPORT test.
PARAMETERS:
p_auart LIKE vbak-auart.
DATA:
BEGIN OF fs_sales,
auart LIKE vbak-auart,
vbeln LIKE vbak-vbeln,
posnr LIKE vbap-posnr,
matnr LIKE vbap-matnr,
netwr LIKE vbap-netwr,
END OF fs_sales,
fs_temp LIKE fs_sales.
DATA:
t_sales LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF fs_sales.
SELECT k~auart
k~vbeln
p~posnr
p~matnr
p~netwr
INTO TABLE t_sales
FROM vbak AS k
OUTER JOIN vbap AS p
ON k~vbeln = p~vbeln
WHERE auart = p_auart
AND p~netwr LT 1000.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
WRITE:/5 'Sales Document'(001),/,
15 'Sales Document Item'(002),
40 'Material Number'(003).
sort t_sales by netwr ascending.
LOOP AT t_sales INTO fs_sales.
WRITE:/ fs_sales-vbeln under text-001.
LOOP AT t_sales INTO fs_temp WHERE vbeln = fs_sales-vbeln.
WRITE:/ fs_temp-posnr under text-002,
fs_temp-matnr under text-003.
ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.
ELSE.
MESSAGE 'No Record Found' TYPE 'I'.
ENDIF.
But i would suggest you to go with views instead of using multiple joins..
Best of luck,
Bhumika -
Hey all I'm on Oracle 10.2.0.0.3
I have the following SQL which works fine.
select *
FROM SYSADM.MASTER_ITEM_TBL A
left outer join
sysadm.ITEM_SPEX_PUR e
on
e.INV_ITEM_ID = a.INV_ITEM_IDIf I now wanted to add another Left outer Table join on sysadm.COMMENTS_TBL based on ITEM_SPEX_PUR.COMMENT_ID = COMMENTS_TBL.COMMENT_ID. I'm having a problem getting the correct syntax down.
Please help! Thanks!!Hi,
Maybe this:
select *
FROM SYSADM.MASTER_ITEM_TBL A
left outer join sysadm.ITEM_SPEX_PUR e on e.INV_ITEM_ID = a.INV_ITEM_ID
LEFT OUTER JOIN sysadm.comments_tbl c ON c.comment_id = e.comment_id
;If you'd like more help, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) and the results you want from that data. -
Left Outer Joining multiple tables to one source table FAILS with VLD-1511
Hi all,
Is it me, or is OWB unable to handle left outer joining 1 source table to multiple other tables?
I want to load a fact table so I have 1 source table with measures. This table must be outer joined to some dimensions that have their FK in the fact table.
The SQL statement would look like this (and is perfectly valid):
select ...
from input, dim1, dim2
where input.c1 = dim1.c1(+)
and input.c2 = dim2.c2(+);
I put the where clause in the joiner operator and validate, but that gives me message VLD-1511: A table may be outer joined to at most one other table.
Even splitting this up into one outer join per joiner still gives this message.
A search and look around on the forum and on metalink shows there are related issues (like bug 3334035). Seemingly creating a view is the work-around to use.....? (ie downgrading owb to a simple gui tool) }-;
Have other people experienced this problem of not being able to outer join one input table to multiple other tables?
Thanks,
EdI have had some feedback from Oracle. It turns out this has to do with 2 issues. Below I have pasted the text that Support gave me:
<---------- START QUOTE ---------->
RESEARCH
=========
Bug 3437036 KEY LOOKUP DOES NOT DETECT ORA-1417 IN VALIDATE/GENERATE STEP
Unpublished Bug 4211684 FORWARD PORT OF BUG 3437036
shows:
Some more development has been completed when this bug is fixed in Paris.
The following are the details:
1. If the join condition contains a full outer join such as
tab1.c (+) = tab2.c (+) and tab2.c (+) = tab3.c
then the new validations implemented for this bug do not apply since
in OWB, full outer join triggers generation of joins in ANSI syntax.
ANSI syntax does not have the original problem the base bug of this
bug reported.
2. If the join condition does not contain any full outer join condition,
then the join is generated in Oracle join syntax, which is subject two
several restrictions. The fix to this bug check two of the restrictions.
3. The first restriction in Oracle syntax is that the outer join operator
"(+)" can only directly be attached to a column name. If you attach it
to an expression, such as the following:
(tab1.c + 1) (+) = tab2.c
Then there will be an ORA-936 error at the time of mapping deployment.
For this case, I have added a validation message VLD-1512 to error out
this situation.
4. The second restriction in Oracle syntax is that a table can only be
outer joined to exactly one other table.
For example, this is an invalid join in Oracle syntax:
tab1.c (+) = tab2.c and tab1.d (+) = tab3.d
because tab1 is left outer joined to tab2 and tab3.
But note that the following is still valid in Oracle syntax:
tab1.c (+) = tab2.c and tab1.d = tab3.d (+)
because tab1 is left outer joined to tab2 and right outer joined to tab3.
So this latter case does not violate the restriction that "same oj" to
more than 1 table is not allowed.
If same oj to more than 1 table is specified in a join condition,
VLD-1511 will be issued, and the map is made invalid.
<---------- END QUOTE ---------->
OWB does a partial validation, ie not all access paths are (can be) checked. A full check is only done by the database itself. So some scenarios (like checking whether multiple tables are outer joined the correct way) are not checked, and in this case are flagged with an error (even though it is actually a correct scenario).
Seemingly this was not flagged with an error in earlier versions of OWB, so beware, OWB behaviour may change when upgrading...
Alternative solutions are (1) using key lookups, (2) using a view with all outer joins in there, (3) using intermediate result tables between the joins.
Hope this info helps some people prevent spending too much time on a false error message,
Ed -
Left outer join using multiple table
Hi,
I am trying to use left outer join with multiple tables , the join condition will be based on PERNR and BEGDA & ENDA for each infotype in selection screen.
select pa00~pernr pa00~begda pa00~endda pa00~massn pa00~massg pa00~stat2 pa00~aedtm pa00~uname
pa01~begda pa01~endda pa01~bukrs pa01~persg pa01~persk pa01~mstbr pa01~ename pa01~aedtm pa01~uname
pa02~begda pa02~endda pa02~nachn pa02~vorna pa02~midnm pa02~aedtm pa02~uname
pa016~begda pa016~endda pa016~cttyp pa016~aedtm pa016~uname
into CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_pall
from ( PA0000 as pa00 left OUTER JOIN pa0001 as pa01 on pa00~pernr = pa01~pernr )
left OUTER JOIN pa0002 as pa02 on pa00~pernr eq pa02~pernr )
left OUTER JOIN pa0016 as pa016 on pa00~pernr eq pa016~pernr )
where pa00~pernr in S_pernr
AND pa00~begda in s_bg0000
and pa00~endda in s_nd0000.
but this fails to fetch the value of begda enda from each pa0000,pa0001,pa0002,pa0016.
Please help!
MonirulWhy don't you use the standard logical database PNPCE and then Provide statement?
-
LEFT OUTER JOIN multiple tables - using the 9i syntax
I've always written my queries using the (+) operator for outer joins. I want to start using the new ANSI standard available in 9i. I can do it when I'm joining two tables in a simple query, but how does it work when I am joining multiple tables?
Here is an example of some SQL that works with the (+) outer join syntax. How can I convert this to use the LEFT OUTER JOIN syntax?
SELECT *
FROM audit_entry aue,
audit_table aut,
audit_statement aus,
audit_row aur,
audit_row_pkey aup1,
audit_row_pkey aup2
WHERE aue.audit_entry_id = aus.audit_entry_id
AND aut.table_name = 'TEST_AUDITING'
AND aut.table_owner = 'CLA_JOURNAL'
AND aus.audit_table_id = aut.audit_table_id
AND aur.audit_statement_id (+) = aus.audit_statement_id
AND aup1.audit_row_id (+) = aur.audit_row_id
AND aup1.pk_column_name (+) = 'TEST_AUDTING_PK_1'
AND aup2.audit_row_id (+) = aur.audit_row_id
AND aup2.pk_column_name (+) = 'TEST_AUDITING_PK_2'
I can join audit_statement to audit_entry easy enough, but then I want to join audit_table to audit_statement, how do I do that, do I start nesting the join statements?
Thanks
RichardThanks for getting back so quickly, I have tried the suggested SQL with mixed results:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM audit_entry aue
JOIN audit_statement aus ON aue.audit_entry_id = aus.audit_entry_id
JOIN audit_table aut ON aus.audit_table_id = aut.audit_table_id
RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row aur ON aur.audit_statement_id = aus.audit_statement_id
RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row_pkey aup1 ON aup1.audit_row_id = aur.audit_row_id
RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row_pkey aup2 ON aup2.audit_row_id = aur.audit_row_id
WHERE aut.table_name = 'TEST_AUDITING_TWO'
AND aut.table_owner = 'CLA_JOURNAL'
AND aup1.pk_column_name = 'TEST_AUDTING_PK_1'
AND aup2.pk_column_name = 'TEST_AUDITING_PK_2'
I had to change the order slightly, between the first two JOINs but otherwise it executed OK. My problem is, it should only return 175 rows but its returning 30625 rows. If I comment out the second reference to audit_row_pkey I get the expected result:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM audit_entry aue
JOIN audit_statement aus ON aue.audit_entry_id = aus.audit_entry_id
JOIN audit_table aut ON aus.audit_table_id = aut.audit_table_id
RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row aur ON aur.audit_statement_id = aus.audit_statement_id
RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row_pkey aup1 ON aup1.audit_row_id = aur.audit_row_id
--RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row_pkey aup2 ON aup2.audit_row_id = aur.audit_row_id
WHERE aut.table_name = 'TEST_AUDITING_TWO'
AND aut.table_owner = 'CLA_JOURNAL'
AND aup1.pk_column_name = 'TEST_AUDTING_PK_1'
--AND aup2.pk_column_name = 'TEST_AUDITING_PK_2'
It looks the same condition is being used in each case but why do I suddenly get so many rows - its joining differently somehow. It must be to do with the order, do I need to bracket the query?
Thanks again
Richard -
Left outer join Bug? Oracle 11 g.
Hi , I am facing a strange problem in oracle 11 g .
I have a select query like this
Query 1 :
Select A.name, B.name, C.name from A Left outer join B on A.id = B.id left outer join C on b.id = c.id and (Some complex condition) left outer join D on C.id = D.id;
A, B, C, D are tables.
(Assume that I have data which satisfies the above join conditions)
However I am not getting C.name in the result. Getting NULL in C.name.
Now if I add a where clause to the above query like the following Query 2 then I get C.name in the results
Consider that there is a field called field1 in table C and the value of field1 is ‘xyz’ for all the rows of table C .
Query 2 :
Select A.name, B.name, C.name from A Left outer join B on A.id = B.id left outer join C on b.id = c.id and (Some complex condition) left outer join D on C.id = D.id where c.field1 = ‘xyz’;
I find this strange , What role where clause is playing ? Why I get C.name only after adding where clause.
I also tried following setting with Query 1 however this also did not help me.
alter session set "_optimizer_join_elimination_enabled"=false;
Is oracle does some optimization if no where clause is specified ? Is this a bug?
Please help me out.
Thanks,
Sumit874384 wrote:
...Is this a bug? Maybe. Maybe not. Really difficult to say based on your description. However, if you suspect a bug, then raise a ticket to the support including much more information (e.g. version 11.x.x.x, define "some condition" and so on).
Nicolas. -
OJ syntax for multi-table left outer join with MS Oracle Driver
I have a multi-table left outer join that works fine in SQL Server ODBC Driver, Oracle ODBC driver 8.01.07.00, but not with Microsoft ODBC Driver for Oracle 2.573.7326.0
SELECT * from { oj A LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.col1 = B.col1 LEFT OUTER JOIN C ON A.col1 = C.col1 }
I noticed someone had a similar problem (the proposed solution doesn't work):
http://www.justpbinfo.com/listarchive/msg02874.html
Does anyone know how to get this working with the Microsoft ODBC Driver for Oracle? Or does it just not work?The Microsoft ODBC Driver for Oracle 2.573.7326.0 does perform the same 'fix up' with {oj} in Oracle 8i. The problem is that it doesn't work when joining more than two tables:
This works:
SELECT * from { oj A LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.col1 = B.col1}
This doesn't work:
SELECT * from { oj A LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.col1 = B.col1 LEFT OUTER JOIN C ON B.col1 = C.col1 }
(The second query will work with the Oracle Oracle ODBC driver, with a bit of tweaking. But I haven't found a way to get it to work with the Microsoft ODBC Driver for Oracle 2.573.7326.0. My suspicion is that it just doesn't work.)
Gavin -
Crystal Report with 2 oracle datasources (left outer join) very slow
I've made a crystal report with 2 oracle datasources (2 commands). I'm using crystal 10.
These 2 data sources are linked with a left outer join.
The report takes a while to run (more then one hour).
i can run Both query's in a couple of seconds/minutes, but it looks like crystal is runniing the second query for each record in the first query.
When i make the same report in BO. Just 2 queries with merged dimensions in the report, it is taking a couple of minutes to complete the report.
Question is if somebody knows how crystal is handling these 2 different data sources.
Is there any way to say to crystal to fetch the data of both queries and do the join after that?
At the moment it looks like that crystal is going to the other datasource for each record in the first query, which will cost a lot of time.Joris,
I've always had a bad time combining a Command with any other object. Performance seems to drop dramatically, just as you've described.
I can't tell you specifically why, it falls off so bad...
The solution I've used is to do a linked server query (at least that's what it's called in MS SQL Server) I've never used Oracle, but I'd be VERY surprised if it didn't have that same feature. This will keep 100% of the processing on the server(s) and will get your run times back to what you would expect.
HTH,
Jason -
Hello everybody, I am kinda new to SQL.
There is only one Primary key for our database. For example 'ID'. Somebody had this code in the WHERE clause code before I started working on this. Do we really need to use the LEFT OUTER JOIN (+) in order to bring all the records. If I remove the join the number of records are reduced to a 1/6th of the original (with the joins). Please help me
EMPLOYEE.ID = ADDRESS.ID (+) AND
EMPLOYEE.ID = PAYROLL.ID (+) AND
EMPLOYEE.ID = USERS.ID (+) AND
EMPLOYEE.ID = DEPARTMENT.ID (+)If you want a row in the result for every row in the employee table, whether there is a matching row in the address, payroll, users, or department table, then yes, you need the outer join. If you only want results where there are matching rows in each of the detail tables, then you don't need the outer joins.
Justin
Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC -
Multiple tables using left outer join?
Hi, guys:
I have 4 tables: A, B, C; if I want to do the following:
A left outer join B, its result left outer join C.
How can I do that? BTW, I am using DB2.
The following is a sample inner join:
select a.id, b.first, c.last
from A as a, B as b, C as c
thanksselect ..
from A a
left outer join B b ON ....
left outer join C c ON ...
WHERE ...
rgds -
Left outer join with multiple conditions
Is it possible to add to a left outer join (= anyOfAllowingNone) more than the primary condition (in SQL this would be added per "and").
Background: The execution plan of the produced SQL shows large results on which the final filter is applied although I have conditions that would decrease this last result set much earlier...There is no easy way to do this in TopLink expressions, other than including the join in the regular where clause as you have done. Does it make a big impact in the performance of your query?
<p>
You could use custom SQL for the query.
<p>
Or you could potentially define a OneToOneQueryKey in your TopLink descriptor that includes the additional join criteria and call anyOfAllowingNone using this query key.
<p>
<p>---
<p>James Sutherland -
Sql help (left outer join)
Hi All,
I am referring 2 regular tables from the HR schema which you get when you install Oracle 9i , Now the issue is that I want all the rows from my employees table even if the row doesnt have the salary equal to 2500.
Here is my Sql:
select e.employee_id
, e.first_name
, e.last_name
, e.salary
, e.department_id e_dep_id
, d.department_id d_dep_id
, d.department_name
, d.location_id
from employees e
, departments d
where 1 = 1
And e.department_id = d.department_id(+) And e.SALARY = 2500
I am achieving my result set from the below query though(its just a syntactical problem) , please help :
select e.employee_id
, e.first_name
, e.last_name
, e.salary
, e.department_id e_dep_id
, d.department_id d_dep_id
, d.department_name
, d.location_id
from employees e left outer join
departments d
on e.department_id = d.department_id And e.SALARY = 2500
Regards
RahulMac_Freak_Rahul wrote:
Well my requirement is to pull all the records from my driving table(ie employees) doesnt matter weather the condition satisfies or not. Just to add to that lets say I would need to bring another table and my join criteria involves data from the employees table and the third table(in this case I need to make sure that all the rows from my driving table remains and doesnt get filter out). Please help my only problem is of the new syntax of outer joins.
Regards
RahulRahul,
Why do you want to use "oracle only syntax ( + )"? I highly recommend you to use ANSI syntax, it's much more readable:
This is from Oracle's documents:
Oracle recommends that you use the FROM clause OUTER JOIN syntax rather than the Oracle join operator. Outer join queries that use the Oracle join operator (+) are subject to the following > rules and restrictions, which do not apply to the FROM clause OUTER JOIN syntax:
You cannot specify the (+) operator in a query block that also contains FROM clause join syntax.
The (+) operator can appear only in the WHERE clause or, in the context of left-correlation (that is, when specifying the TABLE clause) in the FROM clause, and can be applied only to a column > of a table or view.
If A and B are joined by multiple join conditions, then you must use the (+) operator in all of these conditions. If you do not, then Oracle Database will return only the rows resulting from a > simple join, but without a warning or error to advise you that you do not have the results of an outer join.
The (+) operator does not produce an outer join if you specify one table in the outer query and the other table in an inner query.
You cannot use the (+) operator to outer-join a table to itself, although self joins are valid. For example, the following statement is not valid:
-- The following statement is not valid:
SELECT employee_id, manager_id
FROM employees
WHERE employees.manager_id(+) = employees.employee_id;
However, the following self join is valid:
SELECT e1.employee_id, e1.manager_id, e2.employee_id
FROM employees e1, employees e2
WHERE e1.manager_id(+) = e2.employee_id;
The (+) operator can be applied only to a column, not to an arbitrary expression. However, an arbitrary expression can contain one or more columns marked with the (+) operator.
A WHERE condition containing the (+) operator cannot be combined with another condition using the OR logical operator.
A WHERE condition cannot use the IN comparison condition to compare a column marked with the (+) operator with an expression.
A WHERE condition cannot compare any column marked with the (+) operator with a subquery.Best Regards,
Gokhan
If this question is answered, please mark appropriate posts as correct/helpful and the thread as closed. Thanks -
Problem with XMLTABLE and LEFT OUTER JOIN
Hi all.
I have one problem with XMLTABLE and LEFT OUTER JOIN, in 11g it returns correct result but in 10g it doesn't, it is trated as INNER JOIN.
SELECT * FROM v$version;
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
"CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production"
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
--test for 11g
CREATE TABLE XML_TEST(
ID NUMBER(2,0),
XML XMLTYPE
INSERT INTO XML_TEST
VALUES
1,
XMLTYPE
<msg>
<data>
<fields>
<id>g1</id>
<dat>data1</dat>
</fields>
</data>
</msg>
INSERT INTO XML_TEST
VALUES
2,
XMLTYPE
<msg>
<data>
<fields>
<id>g2</id>
<dat>data2</dat>
</fields>
</data>
</msg>
INSERT INTO XML_TEST
VALUES
3,
XMLTYPE
<msg>
<data>
<fields>
<id>g3</id>
<dat>data3</dat>
</fields>
<fields>
<id>g4</id>
<dat>data4</dat>
</fields>
<fields>
<dat>data5</dat>
</fields>
</data>
</msg>
SELECT
t.id,
x.dat,
y.seqno,
y.id_real
FROM
xml_test t,
XMLTABLE
'/msg/data/fields'
passing t.xml
columns
dat VARCHAR2(10) path 'dat',
id XMLTYPE path 'id'
)x LEFT OUTER JOIN
XMLTABLE
'id'
passing x.id
columns
seqno FOR ORDINALITY,
id_real VARCHAR2(30) PATH '.'
)y ON 1=1
ID DAT SEQNO ID_REAL
1 data1 1 g1
2 data2 1 g2
3 data3 1 g3
3 data4 1 g4
3 data5 Here's everything fine, now the problem:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
"CORE 10.2.0.1.0 Production"
TNS for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
--exactly the same environment as 11g (tables and rows)
SELECT
t.id,
x.dat,
y.seqno,
y.id_real
FROM
xml_test t,
XMLTABLE
'/msg/data/fields'
passing t.xml
columns
dat VARCHAR2(10) path 'dat',
id XMLTYPE path 'id'
)x LEFT OUTER JOIN
XMLTABLE
'id'
passing x.id
columns
seqno FOR ORDINALITY,
id_real VARCHAR2(30) PATH '.'
)y ON 1=1
ID DAT SEQNO ID_REAL
1 data1 1 g1
2 data2 1 g2
3 data3 1 g3
3 data4 1 g4As you can see in 10g I don't have the last row, it seems that Oracle 10g doesn't recognize the LEFT OUTER JOIN.
Is this a bug?, Metalink says that sometimes we can have an ORA-0600 but in this case there is no error returned, just incorrect results.
Please help.
Regards.Hi A_Non.
Thanks a lot, I tried with this:
SELECT
t.id,
x.dat,
y.seqno,
y.id_real
FROM
xml_test t,
XMLTABLE
'/msg/data/fields'
passing t.xml
columns
dat VARCHAR2(10) path 'dat',
id XMLTYPE path 'id'
)x,
XMLTABLE
'id'
passing x.id
columns
seqno FOR ORDINALITY,
id_real VARCHAR2(30) PATH '.'
)(+) y ;And is giving me the complete output.
Thanks again.
Regards.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Lightroom no longer starts on Windows 8.1 PC
Creative cloud user on Win8.1 PC. Photoshop, AE, PP and Audition all work great on the same PC. Lightroom pre 5.4 ran just fine. Since 5.4, it hangs when it starts. The user interface loads, but the splash screen never goes away, and Windows eventual
-
I have loaded Pages software on my ipad. I received a PDF document via email as an attachment which I wanted to save. It was a small document, but with lots of graphics, the ipad offered me no no option to store in Pages. What app could I download wh
-
Accessing the Query String parameter from a portlet
Hi! I have developed a PDK portlet in Jdev 10.1.3.3 for Web Center (Just for testing, later it'll go on Oracle Portal 10.1.4). I am trying to access the query string parameter coming in the URL but not successfull at all. Following are the options th
-
Nokia C3+Wifi+subscribe to packet data first
Hi all I need help with connecting to the net with my Nokia C3 using Wifi, I did have Ver 3.something and I was able to download Apps and games no problem using Wifi but today I updated the phone to Ver 08.63 and now I keep getting "subscribe to pack
-
Will Solaris 8 support Promise ATA100?
Does Sun have any plans to support the Promise ATA100 controller on Solaris 8?