Order by decode statement with Union all
Hi
I use Database Version: Oracle 9.2.0.1.0
OCI version 9.2
I try to use order by decode while i have a select base on union and I get en error:
ORA-01785: ORDER BY item must be the number of a SELECT-list expression
Here is my code:
select catalog_type, catalog_id, item_id, item_name
from items_catalog
union all
select catalog_type, catalog_id, organisation_unit_id, organisation_unit_name
from units_catalog
order by decode(catalog_type, 1, item_id, organisation_unit_id)
If I use the decode on a select statement without union, it works.
What I have to do in order to make it work on union all select?
Tnx
Hi,
Here's a slightly different way:
COLUMN sort_key NOPRINT
VARIABLE catalog_type_wanted VARCHAR2 (5)
EXEC :catalog_type_wanted := '4';
SELECT catalog_id, item_id, item_name
, CASE
WHEN :catalog_type_wanted = '1' THEN '1'
ELSE '2'
END || item_id AS sort_key
FROM items_catalog
UNION ALL
SELECT catalog_id, organisation_unit_id, organisation_unit_name
, CASE
WHEN :catalog_type_wanted = '1' THEN '2'
ELSE '1'
END || organisation_unit_name AS sort_key
FROM units_catalog
ORDER BY sort_key
;This way guarantees that (for example) 'SHOP50' comes before 'SHOP58', whether or not they are in the first half of the output or the second half.
Notice that this uses the SQL*Plus COLUMN ... NOPRINT command to hide the sort_key column.
If you're not using SQL*Plus, then whatever front end you are using may have a similar feature.
If not, then you can do the UNION in a sub-query, as Daniel did, but do the ORDER BY in the main query (only).
Similar Messages
-
How to replace huge decode statements with lookups to some simple code/key
I have a legacy PL/SQL application, composed of many very huge decode statements. And the most terribe one is that the guys who develops the application left the company now, leaves no documentation.
We are trying to read and understand those PL/SQL programs, and I'm asked to replace those huge decode statements with lookups to some simple code/key tables? But I have no idea about how to design such code/key tables. Is there any one who has similar experience may help me? Besides code/key tables, any idea will be welcome.
Thank you very much!Not sure what your data looks like but sometimes decode can be replaced with more appropriate functions, ie;
SQL> with t as (
select 'DAY' a, 30 b, null c, null d from dual union all
select null a, null b, 'MONTH' c, 12 from dual)
select coalesce(b,d)
from t
COALESCE(B,D)
30
12
2 rows selected.
SQL> with t as (
select 'DAY' a, 30 b, null c, 0 d from dual union all
select null a, 0 b, 'MONTH' c, 12 from dual)
select greatest(b,d)
from t
GREATEST(B,D)
30
12
2 rows selected. -
Materalized view with union all and fast referesh
I have a one view which is very slow. in this view we are joining many tables and many union all queries.
now I am planing to make materalized view
Tell me how i will created view with fast refresh with union all query.
Pls help its urgent..
Thanks
ReenaRefer to the Replication Manual for the create syntax and exceptions.
-
Report which concatenates 13 views with union all running slowly
Oracle 8.1.7 windows 2000 server
I am trying to improve the performance of a report which is comprised of 13 views.
When I run each of the views individually, the total run time for the views is less than 5 minutes. When I run the report, it takes 28 minutes.
Can anyone suggest why the extra time is being taken?
To reiterate:
select a,b from c; (executes in 10 seconds)
select d, e from f (executes in 3 seconds)
select x, y from z (executes in 1 minute)
total runs time = 5 minutes
However,
select a,b from c
union all
select d, e from f
union all
select x, y from z (executes in 28 minutes)
The execution plans do not change between the report and the indiividual views. Views are being concatenated with union all so no sorting is taking place
Many thanks,
Jason Parker.
Edited by: jclparker on Feb 18, 2009 4:26 AM
Edited by: jclparker on Feb 18, 2009 4:30 AMCould you post the execution plan? Please use formatting tags to save the white space while posting the plan.
-
Help! format of decode statements with between or signs ?
Looking for an example of a decode statement with either a between/and or < > signs in the comparison field.
I have tried several variations, but none seem to work. Any help would be appreciated.
Here's a sample that doesn't work.
Select course_no, section_no, capacity, decode(capacity, (capacity < 12), Less than 12, (capacity between 13 and 15), 13-15, More than 15) from section;
Thanks in advanceHi,
There is a limitation to the Case function, as it cannot be used in the PL/SQL (atleast upto Oracle 8i). Therefore, the only option left is Decode.
If you have to compare the values like capacity < 12 then display Less than 12. You can write it using combination of other functions.
For e.g. follow the steps below:-
1)If you deduct 12 from capacity : (capacity-12) [it will give result as +ve, 0 or -ve.]
2)If you have to narrow down the values to above three options, use function sign:
SIGN(capacity-12) [will result into +1, 0 or -1]
3)Then compare the values using Decode:
DECODE(SIGN(capacity-12),-1,Less than 12,Greater than or equal to 12)
The Decode can be used inside Decode(nested Decode) in above steps to compare more than one values (range between) to get the desired result. Hope have made it clear enough. If not, please let me know.
Cheers.
Yogesh D. -
SQL statement with union clause
Hi,
I have a scenario where i need to generate a sql statement with UNION .
Eg:
SELECT B.YY_ID,
FROM XXXX.YY B
WHERE (B.YY_TY= 'as')
UNION
SELECT B.YY_ID
FROM XXXX.YY_ALT_NAME A, XXXX.YY B
WHERE (A.YY_TY= 'zx'
AND (B.YY_ID=A.YY_ID)"
I tried ns1:table1() union ns3:table2() in XQuery.
But it is pushdown as 2 seperate sqls.
Is it possible to create XQuery that pushdown as SINGLE SQL statement with union clause ?
ThanksNo. See 3.1.1.5 in the document I referenced in your previous post.
-
Decode statement with ||','||
Hi ,
I've the following requriement where i need to append the 2 numbers with comma inside the decode stmt
create table A_STY_VON ( C_1_ID number ,C_2_ID number ,C_3_ID number)
Insert into A_STY_VON
(C_1_ID, C_2_ID, C_3_ID)
Values
(1, 2, 3);
Insert into A_STY_VON
(C_1_ID, C_3_ID)
Values
(1, 3);
Insert into A_STY_VON
(C_1_ID, C_2_ID)
Values
(1, 2);
Insert into A_STY_VON
(C_2_ID, C_3_ID)
Values
(2, 3);And the following select stmt is working
SELECT DECODE (
A.C_3_ID,
NULL, DECODE (A.C_2_ID,
NULL, A.C_1_ID,
A.C_1_ID || A.C_2_ID) ,
A.C_1_ID
|| A.C_2_ID
|| A.C_3_Id) dcd
FROM A_STY_VON A But i want the comma between the numbers so i tried the following ( with distinct )
where i'm getting the invalid number error
SELECT distinct DECODE (
A.C_3_ID,
NULL, DECODE (A.C_2_ID,
NULL, A.C_1_ID,
A.C_1_ID ||','|| A.C_2_ID) ,
A.C_1_ID
||','|| A.C_2_ID
||','|| A.C_3_Id) dcd
FROM A_STY_VON A Could you please help me to achieve this
Thank you
Edited by: Smile on Apr 26, 2012 3:50 AMJust so you can understand why the problem has happened...
There are some implicit datatype conversions going on in your statement, let's just look at a small part of it...
DECODE (A.C_2_ID,
NULL, A.C_1_ID,
A.C_1_ID || A.C_2_ID)Your ID's are numeric.
DECODE as a function can only return a single datatype. That datatype is determined by the datatype of the first value to be returned (if it's null that's another issue but let's not go there).
So, in your above statement the datatype returned by DECODE is determined by A.C_1_ID, which is numeric.
Also in your above statement you are doing a string concatenation of A.C_1_ID and A.C_2_ID, so those numbers are implicitly converted to strings and concatenated, but then because DECODE is now defined as needing a number to be returned, the concatenated string of numbers are implicitly converted back to a number, which is fine because the whole string is numeric.
In PL/SQL code this would go along these principles...
... function ...
declare
v_retval NUMBER;
v_c_1_id NUMBER := 123;
v_c_2_id NUMBER := 234;
begin
if v_c_2_id is null then
v_retval := v_c_1_id;
else
v_retval := to_number(to_char(v_c_1_id)||to_char(v_c_2_id));
end if;
return v_retval;
end;Now, if you try and put a comma into your concatenation...
DECODE (A.C_2_ID,
NULL, A.C_1_ID,
A.C_1_ID ||','|| A.C_2_ID)Still the first value returned has defined the DECODE as needing to return a numeric value, but this time the second returned value (The 'else' part of the decode) has a string containing numeric digits with a comma in between. When it implicitly tries to convert this string to a number so it can be returned from the function, it finds that it's not a valid number.
And we can see this if we use the same PL/SQL type code...
SQL> declare
2 v_retval NUMBER;
3 v_c_1_id NUMBER := 123;
4 v_c_2_id NUMBER := 234;
5 begin
6 if v_c_2_id is null then
7 v_retval := v_c_1_id;
8 else
9 v_retval := to_number(to_char(v_c_1_id)||','||to_char(v_c_2_id));
10 end if;
11 --return v_retval;
12 end;
13 /
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character to number conversion error
ORA-06512: at line 9It can't do the to_number on the string when it expects the return value to be numeric.
SQL has a nice NVL2 function (http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/functions106.htm) which you can use instead when trying to determine different output based on one of the values being null...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 with a as (select 123 as c_1_id, 234 as c_2_id from dual union all
2 select 789, null from dual)
3 --
4 -- end of test data
5 --
6 select c_1_id, c_2_id,
7 nvl2(c_2_id,c_1_id||','||c_2_id,c_1_id) as result
8* from a
SQL> /
C_1_ID C_2_ID RESULT
123 234 123,234
789 789Again, this is using implicit datatype conversion and the resultant datatype of NVL2 is determined by the first result (the second parameter) just as with decode, but because of the way it works, the first result is what it should do if the passed in first parameter is not null and therefore you can force the implicit conversion to a string datatype that way. -
Improve performance with union all
Hello there,
Oracle Database 11g Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
SQL> show parameter optimizer
ORA-00942: Tabel of view bestaat niet. (Does not exist)I have the following query using the following input variables
- id
- startdate
- enddate
The query has the following format
- assume that the number of columns are the same
- t1 != t3 and t2 != t4
select ct.*
from
select t1.*
from tabel1 t1
join tabel2 t2
on t2.key = t1.key
union all
select t3.*
from tabel3 t3
join tabel4 t4
on t4.key = t3.key
where ct.id = :id
and ct.date >= :startdate
and ct.date < :enddate
order by ct.dateIt is performing really slow, after the first read it performs fast.
I tried the following thing, which was actually even slower!
with t1c as
select t1.*
from tabel1 t1
join tabel2 t2
on t2.key = t1.key
where t1.id = :id
and t1.date >= :startdate
and t1.date < :enddate
t2c as
select t3.*
from tabel3 t3
join tabel4 t4
on t4.key = t3.key
where t3.id = :id
and t3.date >= :startdate
and t3.date < :enddate
select ct.*
from
select *
from t1c
union all
select *
from t2c
order by ct.dateSo in words, I have an 'union all' construction reading from different tables with matching columns 'id' and 'date'.
How can I improve this? Can it be improved? If you do not know the answer, but maybe a suggestion, I will be happy aswell!!!
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Metroickha>
So in words, I have an 'union all' construction reading from different tables with matching columns 'id' and 'date'.
How can I improve this? Can it be improved? If you do not know the answer, but maybe a suggestion, I will be happy aswell!!!
>
If you want to improve on what Oracle is doing you first need to know 'what Oracle is doing'.
Post the execution plans for the query that show what Oracle is doing.
Also post the DDL for the tables and indexes and the record counts for the tables and ID/DATE predicates. -
Strange behaviour of view based on several tables join with union all
Dear fellows we r facing a strange problem we have a view based on several tables joined by union all ,when we issue an ordered query on date,rows returned are unusually different than they should be .
Is oracle has some special behaviour for view based on union all ?
I m using oracle 8.1.6 on windows 2000
Kashif SohailDid you ever solve this problem? I have two select statements based on 4 tables and 3 views using about 5 more tables. When I execute each select individually I get exactly what is expected. When I UNION ALL both selects together, I get "no rows returned", however when I UNION them I get exactly what is expected. I should get the same answer for both UNION ALL and UNION. The two select statements are identical, except for one column where I changed the constant to be different. Any thoughts?
-
Different results using View with union all in 11R1 compared to 10R2
Hello,
I have the following situation:
In Oracle 10R2 I defined a view which looks like this
create view test_view
as
select 'field1;field2;field3' field from dual
union all
select field
from (
select tfield1||';'||tfield2||';'||tfield3 field
from table1
order by tfield1,tfield2,tfield3
The idea is, my first line contains a header information an then the data in the required sorting order.
So, in 10R2, when I export the view with select field from test_view, I get the result as expected, which means, the header from the part with the dual was in the first line and after that, the data in the required sort order.
Now, in 11.1.0.7, it is completely different, because the row of the dual is somewhere in my result set. But if I send the sql instead of the view, I get the expected result as in 10R2.
I have no idea why this is the case now, because in 10R2 this was working permanently as expected. When I look at the execution plan, I see, that he starts parallelisation, which is ok, but the difference is, that in this parallelisation the select from dual is included and in 10R2 he first make the line from the dual and then the parallelisation with the data. It's not clear to me, that if I send the sql to the database I see the required result, but if i define the view as mentioned, and start a select field from view, I get now get the different sorting, because of the parallelisation, where the optimizer he changes his behavior comparing the both database versions. So my question ist, how can I change this behavior to get the same behavior as in release 10R2.
Best regards
RainerHello,
thank you for your sample, I see your idea for my sorting purpose.
I want to look at the following point:
I create the table, as you described. The table has the degree and instances 1. Now I deefine the following view:
create view view_test
as
select 'field1;field2;field3' field
from dual
union all
select tfield1 || ';' || tfield2 || ';' || tfield3 field
from (select * from table1 order by tfield1,tfield2).
This is the way I used it in 10 R2.
Now, the SQL select field from view_test delivers the expected result:
field1;field2;field3
a;b;c
d;e;f
So far so good. But now, I changed the degree of the table1 (alter table table1 parallel (degree 4 instances 1);).
The result looks like that:
a;b;c
field1;field2;field3
d;e;f
So, the parallelisation of my object seems to be the reason for the, in my eyes, "wrong" sort order. In 10R2 I used this degree and instance values for my table and defined a view and it was working fine. Now, after our migration, I had this "trouble". For me it seems, that the optimizer made some changes, or mabe this is a bug, who knows ?
I also tried, to change the nls_comp, and set the undocumented parameters as described in the Metalink note 7497640.8, but with no effect of my result set.
Best regards
Rainer -
Interactive Report with union all in the query
I have an interactive report with the following query in the report region:
select property,saddr1,upostdate,sotherdate1,journal_control-1000000000,account,sdesc,uref,
suserdefined1,trans_notes,samount,detail_notes
from journal_entries
union all
select property,saddr1,upostdate,sotherdate1,journal_control-700000000,account,sdesc,uref,
suserdefined1,trans_notes,stotalamount,detail_notes
from charge_entries;
This gets translated as listed below during runtime. I am trying to pass a value to both SELECT statements instead of the just the bottom select statement. Is this possible using interactive reports.
select
PROPERTY,
SADDR1,
UPOSTDATE,
SOTHERDATE1,
ACCOUNT,
SDESC,
UREF,
SUSERDEFINED1,
TRANS_NOTES,
SAMOUNT,
DETAIL_NOTES,
"JOURNAL_CONTROL-1000000000" "JOURNAL_CONTROL-1000000000"
from (
select property,saddr1,upostdate,sotherdate1,journal_control-1000000000,account,sdesc,uref,
suserdefined1,trans_notes,samount,detail_notes
from journal_entries
union all
select property,saddr1,upostdate,sotherdate1,journal_control-700000000,account,sdesc,uref,
suserdefined1,trans_notes,stotalamount,detail_notes
from charge_entries
) r
where ("PROPERTY" = :APXWS_EXPR_1)
0.14: IR binding: ":APXWS_EXPR_1"="APXWS_EXPR_1" value="prop1"
Thanks for any help,
JimThe bottom query is actually the third query, it encompasses the two that are unioned. It is generated by APEX to allow for the search facility - to achieve what you want ignore the larger query, and get your query working in something like SQL developer. Once it's working then put it into APEX, and the search wrapper will be generated.
select property,saddr1,upostdate,sotherdate1,journal_control-1000000000,account,sdesc,uref,
suserdefined1,trans_notes,samount,detail_notes
from journal_entries
where property = :YOUR_CRITERIA
union all
select property,saddr1,upostdate,sotherdate1,journal_control-700000000,account,sdesc,uref,
suserdefined1,trans_notes,stotalamount,detail_notes
from charge_entries
where property = :YOUR_CRITERIA;
Then you need to think about how you are using the report, if it is linked to from another report, then create a hidden variable and pass it from the parent.
If the report is standalone , then you could create an item , that can be edited and when submitted, re-executes the report based on the criteria entered.
Steve
Hot and bothered in sunny Dubai -
Updatable Materialized View with Union ALL
(please don't ask about db structure)
DB: 11gR2
create table table_1 (
id number primary key,
val varchar2(100)
create table table_2 (
id number primary key,
val varchar2(100)
insert into table_1(id) values (0);
insert into table_1(id) values (2);
insert into table_1(id) values (3);
insert into table_1(id) values (4);
insert into table_1(id) values (5);
insert into table_2(id) values (10);
insert into table_2(id) values (12);
insert into table_2(id) values (13);
insert into table_2(id) values (14);
insert into table_2(id) values (15);
update table_1 set val='Table1 val:'||id;
update table_2 set val='Table2 val:'||id;
create view v_table_all as
select * from table_1
view V_TABLE_ALL created.
select * from v_table_all;
ID VAL
0 Table1 val:0
2 Table1 val:2
3 Table1 val:3
4 Table1 val:4
5 Table1 val:5
select column_name, updatable, insertable, deletable
from user_updatable_columns
where table_name = 'V_TABLE_ALL'
COLUMN_NAME UPDATABLE INSERTABLE DELETABLE
ID YES YES YES
VAL YES YES YES
update v_table_all set val='XXX changed' where id = 3;
1 row updated.
select * from table_1;
ID VAL
0 Table1 val:0
2 Table1 val:2
3 XXX changed
4 Table1 val:4
5 Table1 val:5
rollback;
select * from table_1;
ID VAL
0 Table1 val:0
2 Table1 val:2
3 Table1 val:3
4 Table1 val:4
5 Table1 val:5
create or replace view v_table_all as
select * from table_1
union select * from table_2;
view V_TABLE_ALL created.
select * from v_table_all;
ID VAL
0 Table1 val:0
2 Table1 val:2
3 Table1 val:3
4 Table1 val:4
5 Table1 val:5
10 Table2 val:10
12 Table2 val:12
13 Table2 val:13
14 Table2 val:14
15 Table2 val:15
select column_name, updatable, insertable, deletable
from user_updatable_columns
where table_name = 'V_TABLE_ALL'
COLUMN_NAME UPDATABLE INSERTABLE DELETABLE
ID NO NO NO
VAL NO NO NO
trying update:
update v_table_all set val='XXX changed' where id = 3;
SQL-Fehler: ORA-01732: Datenmanipulationsoperation auf dieser View nicht zulässig
01732. 00000 - "data manipulation operation not legal on this view"
*Cause:
*Action:
drop view v_table_all;
view V_TABLE_ALL dropped.all is ok before this point.
now we want create a new materialized view with some query
create materialized view v_table_all
as
select * from table_1
union all select * from table_2 ;
materialized view V_TABLE_ALL created.
select column_name, updatable, insertable, deletable
from user_updatable_columns
where table_name = 'V_TABLE_ALL'
COLUMN_NAME UPDATABLE INSERTABLE DELETABLE
ID YES YES YES
VAL YES YES YES it seems to be ok with update.
but...
update v_table_all set val='XXX changed' where id = 3;
SQL-Fehler: ORA-01732: Datenmanipulationsoperation auf dieser View nicht zulässig
01732. 00000 - "data manipulation operation not legal on this view"
*Cause:
*Action:How can solve this issue??
Any suggestionLooks like user_updatable_columns sort of thinks the MV is just a table - I don't know about that...
An MV on a single table can be updated - I tried that and it works:
create materialized view mv_table_1 for update
as
select * from table_1;I noticed [url http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16579/advmv.htm#sthref294]examples stating the UNION ALL needs a "marker" so Oracle can know from the data which source table a row in the MV originates from - like this:
create materialized view v_table_all for update
as
select 'T1' tab_id, table_1.* from table_1
union all
select 'T2' tab_id, table_2.* from table_2 ;But that also fails (the "marker" requirement was specifically for FAST REFRESH, so it was just a long shot ;-) )
What are you planning to do?
<li>Create the MV.
<li>Update records in the MV - which then is no longer consistent with the source data.
<li>Schedule a complete refresh once in a while - thereby overwriting/losing the updates in the MV.
If that is the case, I suggest using a true table rather than an MV.
<li>Create table t_table_all as select ... .
<li>Update records in the table - which then is no longer consistent with the source data.
<li>Schedule a job to delete table and insert into table select ... once in a while - thereby overwriting/losing the updates in the table.
In other words a kind of "do it yourself MV".
I cannot see another way at the moment? But perhaps try in the data warehousing forum - the people there may have greater experience with MV's ;-) -
Hi All,
I have a requirement as below.
SELECT 'A' AS 'XXX' FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT 'B' AS 'XXX' FROM DUAL
I need to check in such a way in my second sql query if 'B'='A' then i need to print 'A' else 'B' , means in my second query i need to compare the value of XXX with the first query value of XXX if it is same then i need to print first query's value of XXX or else need to print second queries XXX value.
Please help me on thisuser13424229 wrote:
Hi All,
I have a requirement as below.
SELECT 'A' AS 'XXX' FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT 'B' AS 'XXX' FROM DUAL
I need to check in such a way in my second sql query if 'B'='A' then i need to print 'A' else 'B' , means in my second query i need to compare the value of XXX with the first query value of XXX if it is same then i need to print first query's value of XXX or else need to print second queries XXX value.
Please help me on thisYour quesiton is not very clear, I would suggest you read {message:id=9360002}.
If you are looking at a way to see the next or previous row from your current row then you can use LEAD or LAG analytical function. They are well documented. You can read all about it there. -
Creating M.V on time with union all
Hi,
Here i am creating a M.V and i want refresh this on time(example every day 12.00)
create materialized view log on emp
with primary key
including new values;
create materialized view log on dept
with primary key
including new values;
create materialized view emp_dept_new
refresh on (what ever)
as select deptno from emp
union all
select deptno from dept;when i am executing the last script i am getting some error.
Please help me in this issue very argent .............
Thanks
SKPR.SKPR wrote:
Hi,
Here i am creating a M.V and i want refresh this on time(example every day 12.00)
create materialized view log on emp
with primary key
including new values;
create materialized view log on dept
with primary key
including new values;
create materialized view emp_dept_new
refresh on (what ever)
as select deptno from emp
union all
select deptno from dept;when i am executing the last script i am getting some error.You will do as "(what ever)" isn't valid syntax.
Please help me in this issue very argent .............Not for us it's not.
If you expect help, post your actual code and post the error message you're getting. We're not mind readers, so "some error" means nothing to us. -
Inconsistent SQL results when using View with UNION-ALL and table function
Can any of you please execute the below scripts and check the output. In the table type variable, I am adding 4 distinct object ids, where as in the result, I get only the row pertaining to last id in the table type variable. Same row is returned 4 times (4= number of values in the table type).
This scenario is occurring in our product with a SQL with exactly same pattern. I could simulate the same issue with the sample script I have provided.
Database version: 11.2.0.3 Enterprise Edition, Single node
Thank you.
CREATE TABLE TEMP_T1 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
CREATE TABLE TEMP_T2 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
UPDATE TEMP_T2 SET OBJECT_ID = OBJECT_ID * 37;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T1_U1 ON TEMP_T1(OBJECT_ID);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T2_U1 ON TEMP_T2(OBJECT_ID);
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW TEMP_T1T2_V AS
SELECT * FROM TEMP_T1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM TEMP_T2;
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TYPE AS OBJECT (OBJ_ID NUMBER);
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_OBJ_TYPE;
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
DECLARE
TYPE TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_T1T2_V%ROWTYPE;
TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE;
TEMP_OBJ_TAB TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE := TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE();
PROCEDURE ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(OBJ_ID IN NUMBER) IS
BEGIN
TEMP_OBJ_TAB.EXTEND;
TEMP_OBJ_TAB(TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST) := TEMP_OBJ_TYPE(OBJ_ID);
END;
BEGIN
ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(100);
ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(116);
ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(279);
ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(364);
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('=====================');
FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
LOOP
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
END LOOP;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
SELECT * BULK COLLECT INTO TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB
FROM TEMP_T1T2_V VW
WHERE ((VW.OBJECT_ID) IN (SELECT OBJ_ID
FROM TABLE(CAST(TEMP_OBJ_TAB AS TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE))));
FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
LOOP
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
END LOOP;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
IF TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.COUNT > 0 THEN
FOR I IN TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.LAST
LOOP
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_ID||' : '||TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_NAME);
END LOOP;
ELSE
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('NO ROWS RETURNED!');
END IF;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
END;
/I can reproduce it:
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.3.0 Production on Tue Oct 30 14:05:39 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Enter user-name: scott
Enter password:
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> select *
2 from v$version
3 /
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
SQL> CREATE TABLE TEMP_T1 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE TABLE TEMP_T2 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> UPDATE TEMP_T2 SET OBJECT_ID = OBJECT_ID * 37;
72883 rows updated.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T1_U1 ON TEMP_T1(OBJECT_ID);
Index created.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T2_U1 ON TEMP_T2(OBJECT_ID);
Index created.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW TEMP_T1T2_V AS
2 SELECT * FROM TEMP_T1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM TEMP_T2;
View created.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TYPE AS OBJECT (OBJ_ID NUMBER)
2 /
Type created.
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_OBJ_TYPE
2 /
Type created.
SQL> SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
SQL>
SQL> DECLARE
2 TYPE TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_T1T2_V%ROWTYPE;
3 TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE;
4 TEMP_OBJ_TAB TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE := TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE();
5 PROCEDURE ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(OBJ_ID IN NUMBER) IS
6 BEGIN
7 TEMP_OBJ_TAB.EXTEND;
8 TEMP_OBJ_TAB(TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST) := TEMP_OBJ_TYPE(OBJ_ID);
9 END;
10 BEGIN
11 ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(100);
12 ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(116);
13 ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(279);
14 ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(364);
15 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('=====================');
16 FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
17 LOOP
18 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
19 END LOOP;
20 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
21 SELECT * BULK COLLECT INTO TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB
22 FROM TEMP_T1T2_V VW
23 WHERE ((VW.OBJECT_ID) IN (SELECT OBJ_ID
24 FROM TABLE(CAST(TEMP_OBJ_TAB AS TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE))));
25 FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
26 LOOP
27 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
28 END LOOP;
29 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
30 IF TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.COUNT > 0 THEN
31 FOR I IN TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.LAST
32 LOOP
33 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_ID||' : '||TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_NAME);
34 END LOOP;
35 ELSE
36 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('NO ROWS RETURNED!');
37 END IF;
38 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
39 END;
40 /
=====================
OBJ_ID = 100
OBJ_ID = 116
OBJ_ID = 279
OBJ_ID = 364
OBJ_ID = 100
OBJ_ID = 116
OBJ_ID = 279
OBJ_ID = 364
364 : I_AUDIT
364 : I_AUDIT
364 : I_AUDIT
364 : I_AUDIT
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> column object_name format a30
SQL> select object_id,
2 object_name
3 from dba_objects
4 where object_id in (100,116,279,364)
5 /
OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
100 ORA$BASE
116 DUAL
279 MAP_OBJECT
364 I_AUDIT
SQL> Works fine in:
=====================
OBJ_ID = 100
OBJ_ID = 116
OBJ_ID = 279
OBJ_ID = 364
OBJ_ID = 100
OBJ_ID = 116
OBJ_ID = 279
OBJ_ID = 364
100 : ORA$BASE
116 : DUAL
364 : SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_MAP
279 : MAP_OBJECT
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select object_id,
2 object_name
3 from dba_objects
4 where object_id in (100,116,279,364)
5 /
OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
100 ORA$BASE
116 DUAL
364 SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_MAP
279 MAP_OBJECT
SQL> select *
2 from v$version
3 /
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
SQL>SY.
Edited by: Solomon Yakobson on Oct 30, 2012 2:14 PM
Maybe you are looking for
-
10.5.7 POP3 APOP no longer working for me
I have had 10.5.6 running for quite some time, and my OS X Mail.app client has been connecting via APOP successfully. After upgrading to 10.5.7, I can no longer connect via APOP. PlainText works fine, and all other services seem to be OK (ssh logins,
-
PLEASE URGENT HELP!!!!!
hey, excuse me by my english....i ned to know why when i send my new iweb page to my clients, some window apear and ask to every body by my name and password.... I don't want to give my password to every vary!!!!!!!
-
How to determine who performed the last full database dump before cumulative dump
Hello, ASE 15.7 SP100 allows cumulative backups, and if cumulative dump is tried before a full dump, ASE shows this error: You cannot execute an incremental dump before a full database dump. From my experiments, it seems that it does not matter how t
-
IPhoto 6.0.1 Maxes Out CPU
I have a new MacBook Pro 2.0 GHz running OS X 10.4.5 obviously and my iPhoto 6.0.1 (Universal) running in the background occupies 97-98% of one of the CPUs for as long as the program is running. I have a few thousand photos in the library and do not
-
Hi, where are the CS5 Adobe Photoshop articles like these for CS4? OPTIMIZE PHOTOSHOP CS4 PERFORMANCE (updated for CS5) http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404440.html CS4 SUPPORTED VIDEO CARDS http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405711.html OPEN GL FEATURES a