Overridden methods  run like an abstract method

public class Mammal
public int length;
public Mammal(int b)
this.length=b;
public void speciesName()
System.out.println("I am a mammal");
public class Cat extends Mammal
public Cat (int b)
super(b);
public void speciesName()
System.out.println("I am a Cat");
public class Goat extends Mammal
public Goat(int b)
super(b);
public void speciesName()
System.out.println("I am a Goat");
public class Test
public static void main(String[] args)
Cat k=new Cat(50);
Goat g=new Goat(60);
Vector<Mammal> v=new Vector<Mammal>();
v.add(k);
v.add(g);
Mammal m; //reference
m=v.elementAt(0);
m.speciesName();
m=v.elementAt(1);
m.speciesName();
hello all,
my problem about above code is:
on the console : I am a Cat
I am a Goat
but i did not understand why the result is so this.
i thought that the screen output must be : I am a Mammal
I am a Mammal
i supposed that Mammal class's speciesName() method must run.
if speciesName() was abstract method, i could understand the result.
but in this situation, i didn't understand how the output is this.
thanks...

khanD wrote:
i thought that the screen output must be : I am a Mammal
I am a Mammal
i supposed that Mammal class's speciesName() method must run.
if speciesName() was abstract method, i could understand the result.
but in this situation, i didn't understand how the output is this.Now you know that it doesn't matter whether speciesName in Mammal is abstract or not. Overriding works the same regardless.
But there are other differences. For example right now Mammal is concrete so you could create a Mammal object if you wanted. If you made speciesName abstract that would no longer be possible. Right now you also don't have to override speciesName in the subclasses. If speciesName were abstract you would have to do that.

Similar Messages

  • Covariant Method Arguments/Returntypes on abstract methods

    Hi all,
    can someone enlight me - please!
    is there a special reason, why i cannot use the new jdk 5 covariant arguments/returntype feature in conjunction with abstract methods???
    I cannot find a reason anywhere!
    I did something like this:
    public interface DAO {
      public boolean save(Base b);
      public Base read(Long id);
    public abstract class AbstractBaseDAO implements DAO {
      public abstract boolean save(Base b);
      public abstract Base read(Long id);
    public class PersonDAO extends AbstractBaseDAO {
      public boolean save(Person p) {
      public Person read(Long id) {
    Of course Person extends Base ...
    Any hints, etc. are welcome!
    kind regards
    K:)

    And if it does apply to args, won't it have to go the other way?
    That is, if the interface/parent class takes Person as an arg, then the subclass can take Base.
    The way you have it, the interface requires you to accept Base as an arg--ANY Base, but your subclass' save method requires a Person, so it won't work with a non-person base. The subclass isn't honoring its parent's contract. Covariance won't change that.

  • ABAP OO Abstract Methods

    Hi,
    I want to use abstract methods in ABAP. I created an abstract class as base and another 'child' class that extends that class. Now, I want to have different implementations in different child classes. The problem is that the IDE redirects me to the base class when trying to to this. There is no possibility to set the method as abstract.
    Do you know if that concept is implemented at all? Maybe I just forgot to configure something?!
    What do you propose?
    Thank you and best regards,
    Daniel

    Hi,
    If you are creating Local class using SE38, then just by writing "abstact" to the method it behaves like an abstract method.
    If you are creating global class SE24, then genrally all interface methods are "abstract" methods so that we can ihberit and can redefine the methods for example: "IF_FLUSH_NOTIFY~BEFORE_FLUSH_NOTIFY" symbol ~ shows that it is an abstract method in the interface before to that.
    So, even if it refer to its base class you can just implement them in the child classes by inheriting it.
    Hope this helps you if yes try to assign some app. points.
    Regards,
    Suman

  • Does final method works like a inline function???

    Hi,
    in c and c++ we have macro and inline functions.
    In java u can not override final methods but My query is
    Does in java final methods wroks like inline methods ?
    Inline means the method call is replaced by method body at compile time so logically it improves the performance.
    I would like to know if final method works like an inkine method up to what extend it really improves the performance.
    Thanks in advance

    It depends.
    In Java it's mostly the VM (the JIT compiler, to be more exact) that handles the optimization. It may or may not inline methods, depending on which gives better performance.

  • Can abstract method be overridden

    "An abstract method can be overridden by an abstract method"
    If an abstract method does not have any implementation, then what does one mean by overriding an abstract class in the subclass. Any code to show this will be of better understanding.
    Thanks..

    As yawmark demonstrated it can be use to to increase visibilty but it can also be used to reduce exception declarations.
    Example:
    abstract class A
        abstract void f() throws java.io.IOException, java.sql.SQLException;
    abstract class B extends A
        abstract void f() throws java.net.SocketException;   
    }

  • Abstract Method Overriding Problem

    I have an abstract class called "Employee" with an abstract method called "ReturnBasicInfo()" defined.
    I have two subclasses, SalariedEmployee and HourlyEmployee, and each has their own version of ReturnBasicInfo(). The compiler is not letting me do this, however, and I have no idea why.
    I keep getting this error:
    SalariedEmployee.java:6: SalariedEmployee is not abstract and does not override
    abstract method returnBasicInfo() in Employee.The abstract method signature is this:
    public abstract String returnBasicInfo(Employee e);Any idea why this might be happening? I have another abstract method called toVector() that's overriden in the subclasses and that one works fine, so I'm stumped on this. The only difference between the two is that this method takes arguments and the other doesn't. Is that why it can't be overriden?
    Thanks in advance for any help!

    "...In the instructor's example code, he actually
    overrode toString with this method. I thought I might
    be using the real toString(), though, so that's why I
    changed the name to returnBasicInfo(). I didn't end up
    using toString(), though. Maybe I ought to go back to
    calling it toString()..."
    Yes, this SHOULD be overridden in toString(). Do go
    back to it.
    The "real" toString()? Do you mean the default
    version in java.lang.Object, the one that just prints
    out the object reference when it's called?
    Hmm, I guess. I got confused because I'm swapping between String and double values a lot. Taking in an entered number as a String and converting it to a double.
    I think I originally confused toString() with String.valueOf().
    I wouldn't have getYearlySalary() for SalariedEmployee
    and getHourlySalary() for HourlyEmployee. That
    defeats the purpose of polymorphism and dynamic
    typing. Yes, but I do have one polymorphic method --pay(). Each Employee is paid a different way. The one method we were supposed to be able to call on all Employees is just pay(). There is one version of pay() for HourlyEmployees that uses gethourly_rate() and gethours_worked() to get hourly rate and hours worked. The other version of pay() in SalariedEmployees takes in their yearly salary and number of pay periods worked.
    Better to have a getSalary() method in your
    Employee interface and let each subclass implement it
    the way they want to. SalariedEmployee will return
    their yearly salary, HourlyEmployee will return
    hourlySalary*hoursWorkedOK, that's one idea.
    But darnit, I would still like to know how to get my original design to work. So I should change returnBasicInfo() to toString(), you think?

  • Abstract method and class

    I'm a beginner in Java and just learn about abstract method and class.
    However, i am wondering what is the point of using abstract method/class?
    Because when I delete the abstract method and change the class name to public class XXXX( changed from "abstract class XXXX), my program still runs well, nothing goes different.
    Is it because I haven't encountered any situation that abstract method is necessary or ?
    Thanks!

    Yes - you probably haven't encountered a situation where you need an abstract.
    Abstract classes are not designed to do anything on their own. They are designed to provide a template for other classes to extend by inheritance. What you have build sounds like a concrete class - one which you are creating instances of. Abstract classes are not designed to be ever instantiated in their pure form - they act like a partial building block, which you will complete in a class which extends the abstract.
    An example might be a button class, which provides some core functionality (like rollover, rollout etc) but has an empty action method which has to be overwritten by a relevant subclass like 'StartButton'. In general, abstract classes may not be the right answer, and many people would argue that it is better to use an interface, which can be implemented instead of extended, meaning that you can ADD instead of REPLACING.
    Not sure if that helps.. there are whole chapters in books on this kind of thing, so it's hard to explain in a couple of paragraphs. Do some google searches to find out more about how they work.

  • Using an abstract method to assign an annotion property

    Hi Guys
    I have an annotation for specifiying that a method requires a transation. It's very simple, and looks like this:
    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
    @Target(ElementType.METHOD)
    public @interface TransationRequired
        PersistenceUnitDescriptor persistenceUnitDescriptor();
    }PersistenceUnitDescriptor is a simple enum, and I use Aspect J to weave code around methods annotated with this annotation.
    When I annotate a method like this
    @TransationRequired(persistenceUnitDescriptor = PersistenceUnitDescriptor.XXX)
         public Boolean func(String xx)
             //TODO: Something
         }It works fine, but when I annotate like this :
    @TransationRequired(persistenceUnitDescriptor = getPersistenceUnit())
         public Boolean func(String xx)
             //TODO: Something
         }the apect code is never run.
    getPersistenceUnit() is an abstract method and it is the only thing which is different between the two cases.
    I'm not sure if this is beacuse of the annotation or because the weaving, but I thought I would ask in the annotation categroy just in case.
    Anyone got an idea as to what may be causing this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Vackar

    VackarAfzal wrote:
    OK, Thanks for the tip. Pity that it has to be constant, in my opinion annotations would be a lot more powerful if you could dynamically change attributes. That really would make them more than just an alternative to annoying config files. But perhaps there are some technical details that I'm not aware of which makes this idea seem silly.Annotations were designed as a compile-time construct so the values within need to be compile time constants. At runtime, dynamic proxies are used to construct objects whose methods will return the values in question. You are free to construct your own objects implementing the interface of an annotation type at runtime that return values determined more dynamically.

  • Static abstract methods - how can I avoid them?

    Hi everybody,
    just found out that java doesn't allow static abstract methods nor static methods in interfaces. Although I understand the reasons, I can't think of how to change my design to gain the required behavior without the need of static abstract methods.
    Here's what I want to do and how my thoughts lead to static abstract methods:
    ClassA provides access to native code (c-dll, using jna). The path to the dll can be set programmatically. Here's a draft of the class:
    public ClassA {
       private static String path;
       public static void setRealtivePath(String path) {
          //check if path exists and is not null -> get absolute path
          setPath(path);
       public static void setPath(String absolutePath) {
          this.path = path;
      //code to provide access to native lib
    }There is some more classes which provide access to different dlls (therefore the code for accessing the dlls differs from ClassA). Although this works, the setRelativePath method has to be implemented in each class. I thought it would be nice to put this method into a abstract super class that looks like this:
    public abstract class superClass {
       public static void setRelativePath(String path) {
          //check if path exists and is not null -> get absolute path
          setPath(path);
       //force inherting class to implement a static method
       public static abstract void setPath(String absolutePath);
    }thus simplifying ClassA and it's look-a-likes:
    public ClassA {
       private static String path;
       @Override
       public static void setPath(String absolutePath) {
          this.path = path;
      //code to provide access to native lib
    }Since static abstract methods (and overriding static methods) is not allowed, this doesn't work.
    I hope someone can catch my idea ;). Any suggestions how to do this in a nice clean way?
    Thanks in advance,
    Martin
    Edited by: morty2 on Jul 22, 2009 2:57 AM

    First of all, thanks a lot for your answer.
    YoungWinston wrote:
    Actually, you can "override" static methods (in that you can write the same method for both a subclass and a superclass, providing the superclass method isn't final); it's just that it doesn't work polymorphically. The "overriding" method masks the overridden one and the determination of what gets called is entirely down to the declared type.Yes, I know that. There's one problem: Your suggestion means that I simply have to drop the abstract modifier in the super classes setPath method. However, since the super class calls the setPath method (and not the inherting classes!) it will always be the super classes' method being called.
    YoungWinston wrote:
    Why are you so concerned with making everything static? Seems to me that the simplest solution would be to make all the contents instance-based.I want ClassA and it's look-a-likes to be set up properly at application start up, be accessible quite anytime and easily, they don't do anything themselves except for setting the path and calling into the native library which does the math. (Compareable to how you call e.g. Math.cos()). Therefore I don't think that an instance-based solution would be a better approach.
    YoungWinston wrote:
    Furthermore, you could make the class immutable; which might be a good thing - I'm not sure I'd want someone being able to change the pathname after I've >set up a class like this.Thanks for that!
    PS: As mentioned in my first post, I do have a working solution. However, I'm really corious about finding a nicer and cleaner way to do it!
    Martin

  • Virtual methods- abstract methods

    Hi, I need to get this clear in my head.
    In C++ you had virtual methods()
    If a method was virtual this made the enclosing class abstract.
    There is no such thing as abstract methods in C++?
    In java, if you have an abstract method your enclosing class becomes abstract.
    There is no such thing as a virtual method in java.
    is all the above correct?
    Thanks ... J

    Hi, I need to get this clear in my head.
    In C++ you had virtual methods()
    If a method was virtual this made the enclosing class abstract.
    There is no such thing as abstract methods in C++?Incorrect.
    Abstract methods have no implementation. You can have those in C++. If I remember correctly, they'd look something like this:
    public void foo() = 0;
    In java, if you have an abstract method your
    enclosing class becomes abstract.
    There is no such thing as a virtual method in java.Incorrect.
    All methods in Java are virtual by default. Every method is fair game to be overridden by a subclass. You mark them with the final keyword to prohibit overriding.
    All methods in C++ are final by default. You can't override any method in a subclass unless you mark it with the virtual keyword. (This was keeping the Bjarne's philosophy of "only pay for what you use".)
    %

  • Is not abstract and does not override abstract method tablechanged

    I will remove all the gui code to make it shorter, but my problem lies with my InteractiveTableModelListener.
    public class Meet extends JPanel{
      private static void createAndShowGUI() {
            JFrame frame = new JFrame("MEET_dataTable");
            frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
            frame.add(new Meet(), BorderLayout.CENTER);
            frame.pack();
            frame.setVisible(true);
    public class InteractiveTableModelListener implements TableModelListener {
         public void TableChanged(TableModelEvent evt) {
      if (evt.getType() == TableModelEvent.UPDATE) {
          int column = evt.getColumn();
          int row = evt.getFirstRow();
          dataTable.setColumnSelectionInterval(column + 1, column + 1);
          dataTable.setRowSelectionInterval(row, row);
    class InteractiveRenderer extends DefaultTableCellRenderer {
      protected int interactiveColumn;
      public InteractiveRenderer(int interactiveColumn) {
          this.interactiveColumn = interactiveColumn;
    public Component getTableCellRendererComponent(JTable dataTable,
         Object value, boolean isSelected, boolean hasFocus, int row,
         int column)
      Component c = super.getTableCellRendererComponent(dataTable, value, isSelected, hasFocus, row, column);
       if (column == interactiveColumn && hasFocus) {
         if ((Meet.this.tableModel.getRowCount() - 1) == row &&
            !Meet.this.tableModel.hasEmptyRow())
             Meet.this.tableModel.addEmptyRow();
        highlightLastRow(row);
      return c;
    public void highlightLastRow(int row) {
         int lastrow = tableModel.getRowCount();
      if (row == lastrow - 1) {
          dataTable.setRowSelectionInterval(lastrow - 1, lastrow - 1);
      else {
          dataTable.setRowSelectionInterval(row + 1, row + 1);
         dataTable.setColumnSelectionInterval(0, 0);
    public static void main(String[] args) {
            SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
                public void run() {
                UIManager.put("swing.boldMetal", Boolean.FALSE);
                createAndShowGUI();
    }As i say, i have removed all the gui code to make it shorter, but in this code i create the table and add all the model to it. I am being returned with the error
    Meet.InteractiveTableModelListener is not abstract and does not override abstract method tableChanged(javax.swing.event.TableModelEvent)in javax.swing.event.TableModelListener
    what would be causing this error?
    Cheers

    Sorry, just figured out my silly error, the method is tableChanged not TableChanged.
    cheers
    TOPIC CLOSED
    Edited by: nick2price on Sep 11, 2008 7:08 AM

  • ...is not abstract and does not override abstract method compare

    Why am I getting the above compile error when I am very clearly overriding abstract method compare (ditto abstract method compareTo)? Here is my code -- which was presented 1.5 code and I'm trying to retrofit to 1.4 -- followed by the complete compile time error. Thanks in advance for your help (even though I'm sure this is an easy question for you experts):
    import java.util.*;
       This program sorts a set of item by comparing
       their descriptions.
    public class TreeSetTest
       public static void main(String[] args)
          SortedSet parts = new TreeSet();
          parts.add(new Item("Toaster", 1234));
          parts.add(new Item("Widget", 4562));
          parts.add(new Item("Modem", 9912));
          System.out.println(parts);
          SortedSet sortByDescription = new TreeSet(new
             Comparator()
                public int compare(Item a, Item b)   // LINE CAUSING THE ERROR
                   String descrA = a.getDescription();
                   String descrB = b.getDescription();
                   return descrA.compareTo(descrB);
          sortByDescription.addAll(parts);
          System.out.println(sortByDescription);
       An item with a description and a part number.
    class Item implements Comparable     
          Constructs an item.
          @param aDescription the item's description
          @param aPartNumber the item's part number
       public Item(String aDescription, int aPartNumber)
          description = aDescription;
          partNumber = aPartNumber;
          Gets the description of this item.
          @return the description
       public String getDescription()
          return description;
       public String toString()
          return "[descripion=" + description
             + ", partNumber=" + partNumber + "]";
       public boolean equals(Object otherObject)
          if (this == otherObject) return true;
          if (otherObject == null) return false;
          if (getClass() != otherObject.getClass()) return false;
          Item other = (Item) otherObject;
          return description.equals(other.description)
             && partNumber == other.partNumber;
       public int hashCode()
          return 13 * description.hashCode() + 17 * partNumber;
       public int compareTo(Item other)   // OTHER LINE CAUSING THE ERROR
          return partNumber - other.partNumber;
       private String description;
       private int partNumber;
    }Compiler error:
    TreeSetTest.java:25: <anonymous TreeSetTest$1> is not abstract and does not over
    ride abstract method compare(java.lang.Object,java.lang.Object) in java.util.Com
    parator
                public int compare(Item a, Item b)
                           ^
    TreeSetTest.java:41: Item is not abstract and does not override abstract method
    compareTo(java.lang.Object) in java.lang.Comparable
    class Item implements Comparable
    ^
    2 errors

    According to the book I'm reading, if you merely take
    out the generic from the code, it should compile and
    run in v1.4 (assuming, of course, that the class
    exists in 1.4). I don't know what book you are reading but that's certainly incorrect or incomplete at least. I've manually retrofitted code to 1.4, and you'll be inserting casts as well as replacing type references with Object (or the erased type, to be more precise).
    These interfaces do exist in 1.4, and
    without the generics.Exactly. Which means compareTo takes an Object, and you should change your overriding method accordingly.
    But this raises a new question: how does my 1.4
    compiler know anything about generics? It doesn't and it can't. As the compiler is telling you, those interfaces expect Object. Think about it, you want to implement one interface which declares a method argument type of Object, in several classes, each with a different type. Obviously all of those are not valid overrides.

  • Product is not abstract and does not override abstract method

    Received the following errors.
    Product.java:3: Product is not abstract and does not override abstract method ge
    tDisplayText() in Displayable
    public class Product implements Displayable
    ^
    Product.java:16: getDisplayText() in Product cannot implement getDisplayText() i
    n Displayable; attempting to use incompatible return type
    found : void
    required: java.lang.String
    public void getDisplayText()
    ^
    2 errors
    Code reads as follows
    import java.text.NumberFormat;
    public class Product implements Displayable
         private String code;
         private String description;
         private double price;
         public Product()
              this.code = "";
              this.description = "";
              this.price = 0;
    public void getDisplayText()
    String message =
    "Code: " + code + "\n" +
    "Description: " + description + "\n" +
    "Price: " + this.getFormattedPrice() + "\n";
         public Product(String code, String description, double price)
              this.code = code;
              this.description = description;
              this.price = price;
         public void setCode(String code)
              this.code = code;
         public String getCode(){
              return code;
         public void setDescription(String description)
              this.description = description;
         public String getDescription()
              return description;
         public void setPrice(double price)
              this.price = price;
         public double getPrice()
              return price;
         public String getFormattedPrice()
              NumberFormat currency = NumberFormat.getCurrencyInstance();
              return currency.format(price);
    Please help!

    Received the following errors.
    Product.java:3: Product is not abstract and does not
    override abstract method ge
    tDisplayText() in Displayable
    public class Product implements Displayable
    ^
    Product.java:16: getDisplayText() in Product cannot
    implement getDisplayText() i
    n Displayable; attempting to use incompatible return
    type
    found : void
    required: java.lang.String
    public void getDisplayText()
    ^
    2 errors
    Code reads as follows
    Please use the code tags when posting code. There is a code button right above the text box where you enter your post. Click on it and put the code between the code tags.
    These error messages are quite clear in telling what is wrong. You have an Interface called Displayable that specifies a method something like thispublic String getDisplayText() {But in your Product source code, you created thismethodpublic void getDisplayText() {The compiler is complaining because the methods are not the same.
    You also need to return a String in the method probalby like thisreturn message;

  • Getting error while creating abstract method

    hi folks,
    i facing issue for ABSTRACT Class.
    I am trying to create abstarct method, (refered example from saptechnical site),
    I created one attribute i-num, created one method AREA, in  implementation area , i made it as Abstract, then i did syntax check, then it is giving below error.
    *Class ZTEST_CLASS01_AB,Method AREA
    The abstract method "AREA" can only be implemented after its
    redefinition (METHODS AREA REDEFINITION).*
    i tried all the ways..
    created subclass for this, i writted some code in AREA of Sub-class, there it is giving dump, because first one is not activated properly..
    could you please somebody help me on this.
    Sri

    Hello Arshad,
    Create a class(ZABSTRACT) and make its type as Abstract( Which means atleast one of its methods is abstract)
    We can have abstract classes with all it's methods as non-abstract or concrete. A small example is given below:
    CLASS gcl_abstract DEFINITION ABSTRACT.
      PUBLIC SECTION.
        METHODS concrete. "Concrete
    ENDCLASS.                    "gcl_abstract DEFINITION
    *       CLASS gcl_abstract IMPLEMENTATION
    CLASS gcl_abstract IMPLEMENTATION.
      METHOD concrete.
        WRITE: / `I'm a concrete method`.
      ENDMETHOD.                    "concrete
    ENDCLASS.                    "gcl_abstract IMPLEMENTATION
    *       CLASS gcl_abstract_sub DEFINITION
    CLASS gcl_abstract_sub DEFINITION INHERITING FROM gcl_abstract.
      PUBLIC SECTION.
        METHODS concrete REDEFINITION.
    ENDCLASS.                    "gcl_abstract_sub DEFINITION
    *       CLASS gcl_abstract_sub IMPLEMENTATION
    CLASS gcl_abstract_sub IMPLEMENTATION.
      METHOD concrete.
        super->concrete( ).
        WRITE: / 'Abstract class might not have abstract methods at all!'.
      ENDMETHOD.                    "concrete
    ENDCLASS.                    "gcl_abstract_sub IMPLEMENTATION
    START-OF-SELECTION.
      DATA: go_abstract TYPE REF TO gcl_abstract_sub.
      CREATE OBJECT go_abstract.
      go_abstract->concrete( ).
    Although i will agree there is no point in making a class as abstract & having no abstract method
    @Sri: Looks like you're trying to implement the abstract method "AREA" in the abstract class hence the error. For abstract method you cannot define their implementation in the corres. abstract class.
    BR,
    Suhas
    Edited by: Suhas Saha on Mar 30, 2011 12:04 PM

  • Abstract method called in an abstract class

    Hello,
    I am writing some code that I'd like to be as generic as possible.
    I created an abstract class called Chromozome. This abstract class has a protected abstract method called initialize().
    I also created an abstract class called Algorithm which contains a protected ArrayList<Chromozome>.
    I would like to create a non abstract method (called initializePopulation()) which would create instances of Chromozome, call their method initialize() and full the ArrayList with them.
    In a practical matter, only subclass of Algorithm will be used, using an ArrayList of a subclass of Chromozome implementing their own version of initialize.
    I have been thinking of that and concluded it was impossible to do. But I'd like to ask more talented peaple before forgetting it !
    Thanks,
    Vincent

    Ok, let's it is not impossible, juste that I had no idea of how doing it :-)
    The difficulty is that Algorithm will never have to deal with Chromozome itself, but always with subclass of Chromozome. This is usually not an issue, but in that case, Algorithm is required to create instances of the desired subclass of Chromozome, but without knowing in advance wich subclass will be used (I hope what I say makes any sense).
    Actually I may have found a way in the meantime, but maybe not the best one.
    I created in Algorithm an abstract method :
    protected abstract Chromozome createChromozome()The method initializePopulation will call createChromozome instead of calling directly the constructor and the initialize() method of Chromozome.
    Then subclass of Algorithm will implement the method createChromozome using the desired subclass of Chromozome.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Customer participants unable to see documents in Beehive Online workspace?

    I've created a Beehive OnLine workspace and also a group containing all of the participants, including both internal Oracle and external client team members. All can successfully login and see the workspace, but only the internal Oracle participants

  • Combining 2 PDF forms

    I have created 2 PDF forms in LiveCycle ES.  When I try to combine the 2 PDFs in Acrobat Pro 9 (File > Combine >  Merge Files into a Single PDF) I get an error message that Adobe XML forms cannot be merged.  How can I combine the 2 forms into a singl

  • BB9630 verizon unlocked in Russia

    Hello My friend have presented me a Verizon BB9630 unlocked that he've purchsed on e-bay in USA. I've registered BIS in local provider (MTS Russia) and now I have following problem. BIS is working only after I switch of GPRS service on my sim-card (G

  • How do I delete album artwork that came w/ a brand new ipod =no music on it

    I recently purchased a new ipod Classic (80 gig) at a nationwide electronics store. The first time I turned it on it had an album cover of Manu Chao on the Main Menu. There is no music on the ipod yet the album cover is there. The store's corporate o

  • Unsupported canera - JPEG or TIFF?

    Aperture 3.1.1 does not support the RAW files from my Sigma DP2s. I am storing the RAW files separately in case the camera is supported in the future. With Sigma's software, I can convert the RAW files into JPEG or TIFF and then import them into Aper