P.O commitment in PS

Dear masters,
Iam having one issue in my client project, we are having one service order in external processing, purchase requisition, purchase order, then ML81n service entry sheet. after that confirmation. but after this cylce i want to close this activity, but iam getting one error that There is still a purchase order commitment for ...plz tell me wht is the solution how do i close the project.

Hi Ansar,
To close the PO follow the below Steps:
1) T.code ME22n Po Item Detail in Delivery Tab Check Delivery Completed Indicator.
2) Select the Line ITems which you want to Cancel/Close then Click on Delete Button / Icon below the Line Items so that If any user tries to change the po, It says po item is deleted.
To Delete Po permanently from System, Please go thru the link:
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/how-to-use-me98-to-delete-po-from-system-completely.htm
Hope this resolved your problem.
Regards'
Syed

Similar Messages

PS report for Actual and commitment Balance

Dear experts,
Is there any report in PS where i can see list of projects has actual balance and commitment balance?
Note: I want to see only the balance of actual cost ( which is not settled) and commitment balance (Open PO, PR etc..)
Regard
Vetrivelan

Hi,
For commitment- CJI5
actual - CJI3 with correct layout as per you requirement.
also try S_ALR_87013558 report & go to line item report for detail actuals(& you have to change the layout accordingly) & commitment.
hope this would help you...
regards,
SL

Commitment Item-Error while posting GR

Hi MM Gurus
I am tryin to post GR without PO for movement type 101.
and already customized settings for Auto PO allowed for movement type 101.
When i m tryin to save GR, it is showin me error
" No Commitment Item Entered in item 00010 1000 379999"
i dont knw how to solve this error..
Error description Says, someone has activated funds management, cash budget management, or project cash management, therefore i must have to enter commitment item in all involved company code.
so culd u pls let me knw whr exactly i have to enter this details for commitment item.
Thanks a lot..
Regards
Jignesh

Hi,
This is due to lack of budget against the concerned item. Check the same against the commitment item as per the valuation class assigned for the item.This can be viewed in TCode FMRP_2FMB4002 .Ask your FI team for allocation of budget.
Dhruba

Error in Posting Service Entry Sheet - FI 311 No Commitment Item in Item 1

Dear All,
We need a suggestion/solution for the following problem :-
Our customer had raised purchase orders for services in may 2010. The following critical entries were made in the purchase order.
Account Assignment Category was P-Project
The WBS element was entered as the Accounts Assigment Category was P.
The user was entering uncoded services. Hence the material group for that service which had G/L a/c tagged to it was entered. But the G/l code was not populated in the purchase order by the system at that time of creation of purchase order and subsequently the user was able to save and release purchase order.
The user was able to post Service Entry Sheet and generate accounting entries in june 2010.
Additional service entry sheets are required to be posted for the remaining quantites. The client has urcated the SES process into two parts.
1. Through T-code ZML81N the end user is able to create and save the SES.
2. Through T-code ML81N the Head of Department is able to approve and post the SES which results in generating of accounting entries.
Presently the user is able to create SES with tcode ZML81N. But when the HOD tries to approve and post the ses we get the error.
FI 311 - No commitement item maintained in Item 0001 in P220 (company code).
Fund Management is active in this company code and all settings related to Funds Management and FI have been checked by respective consultants.
The end user is not having any problems in processing SES for current Pos. But he is not able to create SES for the POs created in May, 2010 for which the user has already created and posted more than one SES against the same POs.
We have already escalated it to SAP.
Thanks in advance
Anil Shanbhag

Hi,
Use T.code:FS00 and check G/L account 280000 is there in your company code or not.
If yes, check its nature(type/description,control data , cretae bank/intererst tabs)of G/L
NOTE: Also check and compare the field selection between Movement type 101 & your G/L account 280000 in SE38 t.code with Program RM07CUFA
Regards,
Biju

RFC fetching data from table which is not commited

Hi Experts,
               I have a query regarding commit work.Below is the RFC that i have written
FUNCTION ZBAPI_CREATE.
*"*"Local Interface:
*" TABLES
*"      IT_ZABAP_RFC STRUCTURE ZBAPI_RFC_STR OPTIONAL
*"      RETURN STRUCTURE BAPIRET2 OPTIONAL
CALL FUNCTION 'ZBO_BAPI_CREATE'
TABLES
   IT_ZABAP_RFC       = IT_ZABAP_RFC
   RETURN             = return
Break-point.
DATA lt TYPE TABLE OF ZBAPI_RFC_STR_MAIN.
CALL FUNCTION 'ZBAPI_SEARCH_RANGE'
* EXPORTING
*   IS_STR        =
TABLES
   ET_TAB        = lt
*   RETURN        =
ENDFUNCTION.
here in first RFC call i am creating a record in ZTABLE , and then at break-point
i check the ZTABLE where it does not create any record because data is not commited into ZTABLE upto this point, but just after it i have written code for fetching data from ZTABLE but i am able to get this new record in lt.
Can anybody please explain that from where this serach RFC is providing data because inside serach i am simply selecting data from ZTABLE.
Regards,
Abhishek Bajpai
Edited by: ABHISHEK BAJPAI on Jan 28, 2009 1:12 PM

Hi Thomas,
                 Thanks for reply , i checked in ZTABLE ,before search RFC call data is not there but if i commit explicitly only then it is showing data in ZTABLE. Actually my requirement is different -
I have two RFCs 1. Create 2. Search , Now from web dynpro user will call first Create RFCs but at this point it should not insert record in ZTABLE and just after it user will call another search RFC and in this search he should be able to get these newly created records.
I want to have the functionality which a user gets when working with normal database front end like SQLPLus for Oracle. In these scenarios we see that whenever user does any insert or update the data sits in the table but still it is not committed. So there he fires Select query he sees the inserted data. But if he logs off from SQL PLUS and then logs in again, and fires Select query he does not see the data as it was not committed. I want a similiar functionalty in which if user inserts the data through Create RFC and fires the Select query through Search RFC then he can see the newly Created data also even though this data is not committed.
Although if i call create RFC in update task it will not update ZTABLE but in this situation , if user will call search RFC he will not be able to get newly created records.
So my requirement is that i should be able to get those records which are not commited in ZTABLE .If you have still any doubt regarding my question then please let me know.
Regards,
Abhishek

How can i check for posted but not yet commited changes in a form

Dears
I make changes programmatically in a form then i post it using (Post built in).
If the user exits the form, i make check for any changes in the form to commit it using the system variable :system.form_status
Unfortunately the value of this system variable is 'Query' not 'Changed' because of using the post built in.
Is ther another system variable ( or any another way ) that check for posted but not yet commited changes in the form ?
Thanks a lot
Mostafa Abolaynain

I had faced similar situation. Using of package variable which identifies, what is the user's latest action.
This is just a workaround.
Capture what the user has performed into a variable say, PKG_VAR.ACTION,
This will be assigned values like List L, and Create C, Update U and Saved S.
If commit is executed,assing the status S to the variable.
So while closing,
IF :system.form_status = 'CHANGED' or PKG_VAR.ACTION in ('C','U') THEN
-- validate the data, n perform commit.
else
-- just close the form.
end if;
Regards
Deepz : )

Budget Commitment Report - S_ALR_87013558

We have an issue with the Budget Commitment Report S_ALR_8701355 as explained below.
Org Structure:
A* Projects are separate small Projects to track Capital and Operating Expenses
But all the Capital Purchases are done only through C* WBS. And accordingly Capex budget is maintained only for C* WBS. So AWBS has been linked to 3 CWBS ( SW, HW & Dev SW) in one of the user field of C*WBS.
Shopping Cart will be raised using CWBS in SRM. But once PR has been created it replaces the account assignment field with AWBS. And later even the Asset posting happens only with A*WBS
Issue:
While using Budget Commitment Report - S_ALR_87013558, CWBS is giving Budget and A WBS is giving Actual cost. This Actual Cost pertains to 3 C* WBS Elements (SW, HW & Dev SW). So now Business requires to merge the cost of A* WBS with respective C*WBS Element.
We are able ascertain the cost of AWBS but not able find a logic to distribute this cost across respective C WBS.
Current Logic of the Program:
Any document posted using WBS Element will update table RSPCO with just Amount, Period & Value Type (Actual/ Budget / Plan) . So Budget Commitment Report S_ALR_87013558 will fetch the details from this table alone.
Could any of you please let us know how to deal with this problem without altering the existing Org structure .

Hi Rajesh,
I think the report is showing correctly as per the logic. But please elobrate us why the PR created with account assignment C* WBSE is replacing by A* WBSE.
If the account assignment in PR and PO is replacing by A* WBSE then obviously actual cost will book against A* WBSE and report S_ALR_8701355 will display the same.
you can post cost from AWBSE to C WBSE uisng KB15N.
Regards,
Nag.

Difference between closing the connection before and after committing user transaction?

          I was wondering what's the difference between closing the connection before committing
          the transaction versus closing the connection after committing the transaction?...
          for e.g....
          Scenario 1.........
          UserTransaction useretran;
          usertran.begin();
          Connection con = datasource.getCOnnection();
          // do bunch of stuff...
          conn.close();
          usertran.commit()
          Scenario 2...
          UserTransaction useretran;
          usertran.begin();
          Connection con = datasource.getCOnnection();
          // do bunch of stuff...
          usertran.commit()
          conn.close();
          thanks....
          Srini


Hi. As long as you're sure there's a transaction going on, and the connection
is a transaction-aware object (from a TxDataSource), either will be fine.
In the first scenario the actual semantics of the close() call are less than
normal, because we really don't close the connection or return it to the
pool until the actual transaction commits, and in the second case, we have
already taken the connection out of your service as of the commit().
The second scenario is the usual coding style. If there's ever a chance your
code will get non-transaction-aware connections, it is crucial to close
connections, and I always recommend putting the close() in a finally block
so it's guaranteed to happen.
Joe
srinivas wrote:
I was wondering what's the difference between closing the connection before committing
the transaction versus closing the connection after committing the transaction?...
for e.g....
Scenario 1......... UserTransaction useretran; usertran.begin(); Connection con =
datasource.getCOnnection(); // do bunch of stuff... conn.close(); usertran.commit()
Scenario 2... UserTransaction useretran; usertran.begin(); Connection con = datasource.getCOnnection();
// do bunch of stuff... usertran.commit() conn.close();
thanks....
Srini

Commitment only after release of purchaseorder

I'm investigating the possibilty that commitments are only registrered when a purchase order with release strategy is released.
is it possible to have no commitments of a purchaseorder until release ??
I have found this thread which is about the opposite to remove commitment afterwards ?
Commitment Release on Rejection of Purchase Requisition
can thid badi also be used to suppres commitments until release ??
We don't want to use Purchase Requisition if possible and want to create a purchase order directly with status OPEN
kind regards
arthur
Edited by: A. de Smidt on Jun 16, 2010 1:12 PM

Refer this Wiki
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/CommitmentsinPurchasing

WBS & Commitment Code Update in Purchase Order/Down Payment

Sir,
We have created purchase orders by using WBS and Commitment Code and
afterwards, the down payments has been created against the purchase
Orders.
Now we want to change the WBS and Commitment Code in Purchase Orders
and also in Down Payment Request so that the data and reports can be
updated as per the changes.
Pl suggest the way how can we do the same so that our data can be
updated as per the changes in purchase orders.
Regards
Mudit Gupta

Why do you want to change the same now?Has the user entered wrong WBS and Commitment Code?
I yes then cancel the down payment,delete the po & pr...and then through CJ20N create a new automatic pr with correct WBS and Commitment Code.
Regards,
Indranil

Open Purchase order can we maintain commitment item for the year

hi
my requirement is for the year open purchase orders we need to maintain commitment item previously it was not maintain from this year we need to maintain is it posssible

Hi
If your PO has an IO or WBS or a Cost center maintained in it - Run the Program RKANBU01 in SE38 and it will push all the past data of commitments into the CO objects
You need to activate Commitment management in OKKP as well as in IO Type... If IO was created w/o the tick ON, then I believe you dont have a choice here..
br, Ajay M

Commitment report for multile a/c PO

Hi all,
Iam running one commitment report (at CJI5).
scenario is as below:-
PO with Item category "D" with one PO line item and two service line items (Item1 - Rs1000, Item2- Rs.1000) having different WBS elements(A1 & A2),then the account assignment tab was showing mutiple account assignment(50% each).
Commitment report shows Rs1000 each aginst A1 & A2 WBS Element.
Now I have made the Service entry for both line items with WBS A1 and when we see the CJI5 report where i observed my commitments "0"(Zero) for both WBS elements.
Now my question is, why the commitment for WBS A2 is reduced?
Thanks& regards,
Batchu

There's no way that the commitment on WBS A2 to be reduced if you have accepted only the service line item 1 (which is assigned to WBS A1)
Are you sure you haven't entered the services for both the line items?
When you copy/accepted the service line items from the PO you should have particulary selected line item 1 and accepted it.
Just check report CJI3 which is project actual line item report, if see the actuals here on both the WBS's i.e, A1 and A2, then it means confirmation for both the items has been done so reduction in commitment is correct.
Regards
Sreenivas

Internal order - any program to reconstruct actual and commitment figures?

If internal order is activated later, is there any program that can update the IO actuals/commitments based on PR / PO / FI documents which are assigned to the respective IO?
I think for commitments, the program is RKANBU01, correct? How about actuals from goods/invoice receipts or FI docs?
Thanks

for commitment values the report is RKANBU01 (see note 152571 for reference)
For document transfer from FI to CO you can use transaction OKBA
You can also check notes 45122 and 98520 explaining how to
post FI doc.subsequently w/o acct assgnmnt to CO
hope this will help you

Period Balance Report for Actual/ Commitment only

Hi,
Do we have any report for getting Periodic balance for cost Centre Actual and commitment Balances.
Regards,
Venkat

If there is not a specific YtD report, then it is easy to create one: Using the report painter, copy the existinf report, and amend the columns to reflect not the current month, but from the 1st period to the current month.

Tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items

Hello Experts,
I need help in finding the tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items.
I need develop a report which can show the actual and commitment items for each order and Operation/component under that each ITEM wise and its related documents.
For the component we can find the table RESB.
But i am getting the difficult to find the data related to Operation (services)
In my client we can able to see PM orders with activity types and SKF
How can build the logic to find the values for each operation item and its commitments (PO, PR) and actual that is FI documents
Please guide me the TABLES and fields or else give me the hints, how can find the tables
Thanks and Regards,
Narendra

Hi,
The tables are COEP (actuals) and COOI (commitments); that is if you mean the financial figures.
Regards,
Eli

Sales order ATP vs Purchase order inventory commitment

Hello,
Have issue and hope someone can advise. The basic problem is sales order is receiving confirmed ATP against inventory, even though that inventory is consumed by a purchase order.
Here's the flow:
1. Plant A (receiving): places purchase order (doc type NB) & commits all of whatu2019s in stock at plant B
2. Plant B (supplying): standard sales order is created after above purchase order for identical material, date, quantity
Check rule (t/c OVZ9) for sales order is ticked for u201CInc. purchase ordersu201D
Not sure if this has bearing, but these plants are under different company code so thisu2019d be intercompany.
Expectation is the sales order in this scenario would receive delivery commit per lead time on the material (since it was created after the PO), but instead it is happening against stock already given to the purchase order. Any suggestions on what is needed to fix so the sales order does not get ATP from stock already committed to a purchase order? Thanks

Hi,
In T.code OVZ9, for your availability checking rule and Availability check combination, you need to select value X or A, in the field Incl. release order requirements.
Regards,

P.O commitment in PS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for