Package restriced interfaces

I,ve read a bit about access modifiers for interfaces. I want to define an interface restricted only to the package. I would do that by leaving out the access modifier in the interface declaration. Then I have the class implementing the interface (obviously, in the same package). Since I made the interface accessible only in the package, I would assume I would be able to also restrict the implementing methods to the package.Why am I forced to make the implemented method public?
Thanks for your time,
Cheers,
Radu Cosmin

True. This is kind of exacly my case. I want to extract that mehot (those methods) in an interface to keep the code clean, elegant an logic, but my main concern is to keep (as in your example) m() as being accessed only within the package. This is my example:
package org.dotit.desktop;
* This interface denotes something that can own the focus
interface IDOTFocusOwner {
    boolean isFocusOwner();
    void setFocusOwner(boolean focus owner)
package org.dotit.desktop;
public class DOTComponent extends BlaBla implements IDOTFocusOwner {
    public final boolean isFocusOwner() { // ... }
    final void setFocusOwner(boolean focusOwner) { //...}
}You understand that I wouldn't leave "setFocusOwner" accessible outsite the package, and I would still want the methods do be defined in an interface, so that
the pseudo-focus manager that I'm implementing woul work with the interface, not the concrete class. I really don't understand their decision...seems that I have to structure my code somehow else.

Similar Messages

  • Variable Scope at package or interface level

    Hi,
    Can we set the ODI Project variable scope to package or interface level
    because in my project im using a last rundate refresh variable this variable value will be changed at the time of execution of each package.
    Thanxs
    Madhavi

    you can create it as "Not Persistent" and then its value exist per ODI session.
    In this way, several sessions can keep independent value to the same variable.

  • Where to package my interfaces

    It seems that the general rule to making a GUI application is to seperate the "Business Logic" from the "Presentation Logic". From this, I'm guessing I'll need to package all my GUI stuff together, and all the business logic layer stuff together.
    The GUI will then talk to the Biz lay through an interface right?
    This is not a single file right? Would this would be a set of interfaces all packaged together? If so, where is the most common place to package it?
    Or perhaps I'm completely wrong... any suggestions appreciated, thanks!!!

    It seems that the general rule to making a GUI
    application is to seperate the "Business Logic" from
    the "Presentation Logic". This is absolutely true.
    From this, I'm guessing I'll
    need to package all my GUI stuff together, and all the
    business logic layer stuff together.If you mean the package names and structure then I would had adapted this structure:
    1. I will have a package under which I will put the application common classes and interfaces.
    com.myapp.common.eventhandler.EventHandler (interface)
    com.myapp.common.eventhandler.AbstractEventHandler (default implementation)
    com.myapp.common.form.Form (interface)
    com.myapp.common.form.AbstractForm (default implementation)2. Create for each subject area its own package:
    com.myapp.product.AddNewProductForm
    com.myapp.product.AddNewProdcutEventHandler
    com.myapp.sales.PriceListEeventHandler
    com.myapp.sales.PriceListEeventHandler
    The GUI will then talk to the Biz lay through an
    interface right?As I illustrated through my previous example, you should have common interfaces and you might need to create Abstract classes that encapsulates the common implementation for these interfaces, then for each GUI Form or Web Page you will create its specific implementation class which inherits from the abstract class.
    Finally if you were asking about the deployment packaging:
    1. Create for each EJB its own jar file then bundle these Jar files under one module jar file, which represents the EJB module.
    2.Package the web application (JSP, Servlets, HTML, Images, CSS, and Java script) in one Web module WAR file.
    3. Package your client application module in its own jar file.
    4. Assemble the EJB module Jar, Web module War, and Client module Jar in one J2EE package which will be an EAR file so that your whole package will be assembled in one EAR file at the end.
    Try the "Application Assembly Tool" which comes with WebSphere. It will organize your application and facilitate this kind of integration.
    - Sherif.

  • Pacman architecture + searching packages via interface

    I am aware of the long discussions on GUI's for pacman. But we have to focus on the aspect of usefullness when talking about software development.
    Pacman is a package installer etc.. and thus the link between a user and installing applications. Pacman is a very usefull tool/system: It is fast (using the wget option), doesn't breaks easily on dependencies, etc... . But pacman lacks on one big feature: searching!.
    If I need to search for a application I will have to use the archlinux website! (using grep and pipe the output is not an option).
    Of course I could use the pacman -Ss search-term command but then I could get a long list of unstructured results.
    Also if i would like to batch some packages I have to type all of them at once -> this is not a preferable way of working. Whenever I like to install a number of packages at once I have to type all the names. Selecting them in a list is conveniance.
    The kde application kpackage is perhaps the best way to implement this functionality. I found a lot of posts on a kpackage plugin but none very informative on the matther of existance.
    I am not interested in a real GUI for pacman, but more specific information on pacmans architecture and possibilies to be implemented inside automatisation applications like kpackage.

    This is simply not the case.
    pacman -Ss p2p
    extra/amule 2.0.0rc8-1
    aMule is a eMule-like client for ed2k p2p network
    extra/gift 0.11.8.1-1
    A bridge between P2P protocols and front-ends.
    extra/napshare 1.3-1
    A complete, fully featured Gnutella P2P client
    extra/xmule 1.9.5-1
    An easy to use, multi-platform clone of the eMule P2P filesharing client
    pacman -Ss p2p ftp
    current/bftpd 1.0.24-2
    A very configurable (and secure) Linux FTP server
    current/gftp 2.0.18-1
    A multithreaded ftp client for X Windows
    current/lftp 3.1.0-1
    Sophisticated command line based FTP client
    current/netkit-ftp 0.17-3
    Commandline ftp client
    current/netkit-tftp 0.17-3
    This is netkit-tftp for Linux
    current/proftpd 1.2.10-2
    A high-performance, scalable FTP server
    current/rssh 2.2.2-1
    A restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp
    current/snarf 7.0-2
    Command-line URL retrieval tool (http/ftp/gopher)
    current/vsftpd 2.0.2-1
    Very Secure FTP daemon
    extra/amule 2.0.0rc8-1
    aMule is a eMule-like client for ed2k p2p network
    extra/gift 0.11.8.1-1
    A bridge between P2P protocols and front-ends.
    extra/napshare 1.3-1
    A complete, fully featured Gnutella P2P client
    extra/xmule 1.9.5-1
    An easy to use, multi-platform clone of the eMule P2P filesharing client
    extra/kbear 2.1-2
    A graphical ftp client for KDE
    extra/ncftp 3.1.8-1
    A set of free application programs implementing FTP
    extra/pure-ftpd 1.0.20-2
    Pure FTP Server is a fast, production quality, standards-conformant FTP
    server
    extra/sitecopy 0.14.3-1
    Synchronize local and remote web site via FTP or WebDAV
    extra/tftp-hpa 0.40-2
    official tftp server
    extra/weex 2.6.1.5-1
    With weex, the maintainer of a web site or archive that must be administered
    through FTP interaction can largely ignore that process
    extra/wput 0.5-1
    A command line tool to upload files to FTP site, the opposite to wget
    searching for "p2p" gave me all the packages with p2p in their name/desc. Seaching for "p2p ftp" gave me all the ftp OR p2p pacakges.
    Is that not what you want?

  • Creating interface visibly outside package, but not implementable

    Hi,
    I want to make interface which is implementable only within its package, but usable also outside the package.
    for example:
    package a
    interface A {...} // not implementable out of the package
    public interface Asafe1 extends A {...} // implementable out of the package
    public interface Asafe2 extends A {...} // implementable out of the package
    package b
    public class Aimpl1 implements Asafe1 {...}
    public class Aimpl2 implements Asafe2 {...}
    public class Driver
         void doSomethong()
              for (A a : aList)
                  // do some A stuff
    }Is there a way to do it?
    Edited by: s_roee on Aug 24, 2009 4:38 PM
    Edited by: s_roee on Aug 24, 2009 4:38 PM

    Hi,
    I guess that there's no much difference if I put the interface here as an static internal interface of SomeClass, or as a package visible interface...
    Its a little hard to understand how it bypass my problem.
    Let me give an example (not the real example..) of a place my design takes place.
    So, lets say that There is an interface IUSACitizen implementation,
    Now lets say that every state treats its citizens with whole different methods and processes, so each state has its own IUSACitizen, like New Tork having NewYorkCitizen, Whashington has WashingtonCitizen.
    For the sake of state purposes, new york processes will use NewYorkCitizen, but for the sake of U.S level usage, it will treat them all as IUSACitizen.
    So, I want that methods that need to use IUSACitizen will be able to do so, but methods that will try to implement IUSACitizen will have to go through one of the underlying classes/interfaces.

  • Java Interface with Package

    Hai,
    I cannot run this package with interface.
    My interface is interTest.java Under
    C:\Test\src\com\jeya
    package com.jeya;
    public interface interTest {
    public void Myname(String n);
    My java program is classTest.java under
    C:\Test\src\com\jeya
    package com.jeya;
    public class classTest implements interTest
    public void Myname (String n) {
    System.out.println(n);
    public static void main(String args[])
    classTest st=new classTest();
    st.Myname("Jeyanthi");
    After compiling interface the Class file are stored in
    C:\Test\classes\com\jeya\interTest.class
    But If I run the classTest.java, It shows the error in "implements interTest" Cannot Resolve Symbol .
    So pls help to solve this problem

    Hi Jaya,
    After you have create the package,
    you should run the file from this path, like this,
    C:\Test\src>java com.jeya.classTest
    regards
    Dhinakaran

  • Interface Package CHECK

    I expose my problem.
    I create a specifical hierarchical structure package on CRM7 for test Interface Package Check.
    This is a representation of my hierarchical structure package :
                                                                P1 (Structural Package)
                                           P1_1 (main package)                  P1_2 (main package)
              P1_1_1 (Normal package)                       P1_1_2 (Normal package)
            (I1 interface package with                         (use I1)
            Data element E1)                                       Use E1 and E2 in a Structure S1
         Define Data element E1 et E2                       Use E1 and E2 in a program Prg1
    When I activate my structure S1 I have the error of use E2. It's OK.
    When I use extended check code with program Prg1 I haven't error on use E2.
    When I use a standard element  in my program and I use extended check code I have an error on use the standard element when I don't add the package interface where standard element is declared.
    Have you any idea which explain the difference on check with my specific data element and with standard data element ?
    Thanks for your response.

    Hi,
    first of all, you have to check if th ystem-wide package check is switched on. Check in transaction SM30, maintenance view PAKPARAM_V. GLOBAL_SWITCH must be equal to 'R3ENTERPRISE'.
    I don't understand the behaviour you describe. The package error must be reported either for both development objects in the consumer package or not at all.
    Regards,
    Stefan

  • What is usage of package interface?

    Hi Experts:
                    Who knows what the usage of package interfce is? How to use it in development.

    Use
    From the outside, a package looks like a "black box." To make packages visible from the outside so that they can be used, you define package interfaces. Only those package elements that have been added to an interface can be used by other packages. Packages make their services available to other packages using interfaces.
    Prerequisites
    You have opened the relevant package in the Package Builder.
    Procedure
    To create a package interface:
    Make sure you are in Change mode.
    Choose the Package interfaces tab.
    Choose Add.
    The system displays the Create package interface dialog box.
    Enter a name and short description for the interface.
    Choose  to confirm your entries.
    Save your entries ().
    In the dialog box that appears, assign a transport request.
    Result
    You have created an interface for the package. Each interface you create is an independent transport object, separate from the package.
    You can also add package elements to the interface to make the elements in it visible to other packages.
    package inerfaces play a important role in advanced ABAP technogies
    such as
    ABAP OBJECTS
    DYNPRO
    for  detailed information packages interfaces
    follow thelink
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/6066fbe8-edc4-2910-9584-a9601649747d
    <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 22, 2008 2:39 PM

  • Separate interfaces and classes in separate packages?

    I am writing an application in the package 'models.geometry'. I am beginning to get a growing number of interfaces with corresponding implementation classes. I therefore consider adding another packages an move all the interfaces to this package and keep the implementation in the original package:
    'models.igeometry' // for the interfaces
    'models.geometry' // for the implementation
    But is this interface/class - package separation good practice?

    First of: Usage of the prefix "I" to identify interfaces is rather rare in the Java world (it's not unheard of, but definitely not the norm). And I've never seen "i<package>" to identify a package containing interfaces, so I wouldn't suggest it.
    The question is: What does the code which uses your packages access? Does it only need the interfaces and a factory? In this case, I'd separate the packages into "models.geometry" and "models.geometry.impl".
    If the classes are first-level API, just as the interfaces (think Link/ArrayList, Map/HashMap), then I'd keep them in the same package or separate them on some other property.

  • Odi-row wise insertion of single source into multiple interfaces in package

    hi,
    i have an issue.My source table is emp(empno(pk),name,job,mgr,sal,deptno,comm).And my target tables are
    emp1(name,empnoa(pk),deptno),emp2(empnob(pk),job,sal).
    i have two interfaces: interface1----emp to emp1
    interface2-----emp to emp2.
    I have 100 rows in my source table.
    Requirement is :in my package i put interface 1 after interface 2.
    For each row of the sorce emp.The data should go into targets emp1,emp2.If a particular row isnt getting into either emp1 or emp2.That particular should rollback[i.e it should enter into either emp1 or emp2].
    The insertion should be row wise and not the whole of source data.
    How do i go about this?

    Perhaps this will work:
    Keep interface 1 as is - run it first in the package.
    for interface 2, join emp to emp1, only update/insert into target (emp2) if: emp.empno = emp1.empnoa - this way, you will not add anything to emp2 that is not in emp1.
    then, create a simple procedure to
    delete *
    from emp1
    where not empnoa in (select empnob from emp2)
    They may be a better solution, but this is easy and should work just fine.

  • Error executing ODIMoveFile process after Essbase interface

    Hi
    I have created a package with execution of ODIMoveFile after Essbase extraction interface, in following order:
    1. An interface extracts dimension from Essbase into a txt file
    2. ODIMoveFile to move(not copy) this file at other location
    Now when i execute this package, the interface to extract the dimension executes fine and it gives the output in file.
    But during the execution of ODIMoveFile, it gives error saying, the file could not be deleted.
    Now, once the extraction of dimension members is complete, why does ODIMoveFile not able to move the file?
    I also tried to replace the ODIMoveFile with OS command which executes a Bat file to copy the file & then delete it. This time, the second part continues to execute for long duration without giving errors & i need to manually stop it.
    Moreover, when i tried to manually delete the file, i am unable to do so, giving error that the file is in use.
    Does the control over the file does not get removed even if interface completes execution??

    Hi,
    I think there is a lock of the file until the package has completed.
    There is a way round this.
    Create a package with the extract measures interface.
    Create a scenario from the package.
    Create another package, use the tool OdiStartScen to start the Scenario you created above.
    Next step have the OdiFileMove.
    Ok?
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Message Packaging in PI not working as described?

    Yesterday I made some tests with the new feature message packaging. I noticed some strange and very impractical behaviour. Generally it says that PI takes packages of n messages when available and sends any message at least in time t. First restriction: This is per queue, i.e., when n messages arrive in one queue, a package is built. I reduced queues to one and sent test messages, setting n = 3 and t = 10. No matter how many messages I sent, the system always waited the 10 seconds and then started processing, even though I sent 3 messages. If I send 7 messages, the system waits for 10 seconds, then grabs 6 messages in 2 packages and then waits again for 10 seconds till the last message is proceeded.
    Then I configured 2 scenarios A and B. I set n = 3 for both, but for A t = 10 and for B t = 30. If I send now messages BBAAAB, the system waits 30 seconds and then processes all messages (in 2 packages), although t = 10 for scenario A. If I send ABBBAA, the system waits for 10 seconds, then processes all As, then waits again for 20 or 30 seconds till processing the Bs.
    Has anybody made similar experiences? Did I forget something somewhere?
    Please don't post links like this one:
    I followed the steps there, and the problem does not seem to be due to some configuration made there. Any comments like "will be fixed in SP6" or "set parameter X to Y and it works" are really welcome.
    Regards,
    Jörg
    P.D.: I am really quite annoyed that entries in smpprel3 seem to be made only for scenarios with a mapping and that the message packaging retrieves interface data from there. Most of our scenarios don't use mappings, and creating entries for these scenarios manually is really not a nice task.

    Hi Jorg,
    do chk this link i hope it may be helpfull to you
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00982670-748c-2a10-3985-cdd42fb43e50
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90e5745d-5dbc-2a10-ddb1-b40140a68d02
    Regards
    Sampath

  • Public abstract interface I{

    Interface are totally abstract by default so what is the need of abstract in
    public abstract interface I{
    ........}does this have any functionality........

    I believe it's entirely redundant.
    I believe that the "public" part is also entirely
    redundant.
    Check the language spec to be sure.Abstract is redundant--all interfaces and their methods are implicitly abstract.
    Public is redundant for interface methods--they're always public--but not for the interface itself. You can have package-scope interfaces. Not sure about private ones.

  • Access specifiers for interface methods

    When we implement the interface ,we have to specify the implementing method access specifier to be "PUBLIC" ,but not "PROTECTED" or "PRIVATE".
    Compiler is giving an error -- attempting to assign weaker access privileges ,when we specify protected.
    what is the internal reason for this?Why we shouldnt make the access weaker in the implementing class.
    Can any one help me on this.Your help is highly appreciated.

    When we implement the interface ,we have to specify
    the implementing method access specifier to be
    "PUBLIC" ,but not "PROTECTED" or "PRIVATE".
    Compiler is giving an error -- attempting to assign
    weaker access privileges ,when we specify protected.
    what is the internal reason for this?There is absolutely no point in having a private interface method. The interface represents a visible abstraction and private methods are never visible so it is a contradiction in terms.
    An interface is intended to represent an abstraction that a user (software) uses. Protected via child/parent represents a usage that is restricted to a child from a parent. The child can already see the parent so there is no point in having an abstraction for the child. And it would probably be unwise to limit a child by such an abstraction.
    Protected via the package and interfaces is more contentious as to why it is not allowed. There are those that argue that this should be allowed so that a package can use interfaces but restrict them to the package. To me this seems like a minor point given that most interfaces will probably represent an abstraction to other packages and not within a single package. This applies specifically to default access as well.

  • PL/SQL help in Package

    Hi all,
    I have a block of code in a package that runs 3 times to spit out a Total.
    I want to capture the 3 Totals and return the highest total..
    so whats the best way to store those three values and select the highest Total from the same package....
    Edited by: 874167 on Jul 26, 2011 2:35 PM

    874167 wrote:
    I want to capture the 3 Totals and return the highest total..
    so whats the best way to store those three values and select the highest Total from the same package....Packages allow static variables to be created. The values can be stored as either private (defined in the package body/implementation section) or global (defined in package header/interface section) static variables.
    The package function that returns the highest number can use the Greatest() function. E.g.
    SQL> declare
      2     n       number;
      3  begin
      4     n := Greatest( 100, 123, 92, 81, 156 );
      5     dbms_output.put_line( 'max='||n );
      6* end;
    SQL> /
    max=156
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL>

Maybe you are looking for