Packet per packet load sharing

hi, my question:
i have two routers which are connected over two links (same type, same speed).
now i want to change from per destination to per packet load-sharing.
i know there is the command "ip load-shar per packet" but my question:
must i use this command on all 4 interfaces (2 interfaces - two router),
or must i only configure this on one interface per router ??
thanks for answer !

hi there. I have one doubt pertaining to per-packet load-sharing. In order to connect my two remote sites- A & B, Site A is having two WAN links and Site B is having two WAN links - one from ISP1 (30Mbps link) and the other from ISP2 (50Mbps link). I am doing static route load balancing using same AD values for both the ISPs. I have configured "ip load-sharing per-packet" on both the outgoing interfaces.
The load is getting distributed equally across both the links but total bandwidth utilization across both the links is not going beyond 30Mbps. The combined bandwidth of both links is 80Mbps (50+30). However links are not getting fully utilized even though heavy load is there on the links. Can you please tell me how to make full use of both the wan links at both the ends?

Similar Messages

Cat3560 ip load-sharing per-packet

What IOS for the cat3560 have on interface configuration mode command:
ip load-sharing per-packet ?
On my cat3560 with IOS c3560-ipservicesk9-mz.12.2-25.SEB4.bin
I have only:
Switch_A(config-if)#ip load-sharing ?
per-destination Deterministic distribution
<cr>
Thanks in advance.

none, the platform does not support per packet load-sharing at all. Same with higher end catalyst switches.
Please rate helpful posts.

If load sharing is possible by this 10:2 ratio?

Hi,
I have two different isp's with different bandwidth.In this networks are advertised by eigrp protocol & packets are sending ip load sharing per packets configuration.
1.Isp-1 having a 10Mbps bandwidth & Isp-2 having a 2Mbps bandwidth
In this scenario if it is possible to do the load sharing ? If yes Please explain.

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
I think it's possible, but I'm far from being an EIGRP expert. BTW, PfR PIRO should also be able to do this, and do it based on actual link loading.
Also BTW, I would highly recommend against doing per packet load sharing. In theory, IP doesn't care, but many application using IP do care.

Per Packet load Balancing in Cisco Switches

Hi Team,
Can we enable per packet load balancing/sharing in cisco 3560 and 4948 Switches ? I can see two routes are installed in routing table for a destination prefix but for traffic to specific destination is not going across both the link. The option what i am getting in command line is ip load-sharing per-destination but not ip load-sharing per-packet.
Please do let me know is there any option to do per-packet load balancing
I have tried disabling route-cache, cef etc.. no result.
Rgds
Rama

Hi Ramachandra,
On both these platforms per packet load balancing is not surpported. it is a feature mostly seen in routers.
it can use the following variables for the load sharing hash (but the per packet is never used)
Source ip
Dest ip
Source tcp port
Dest tcp port
so you can configure flow based sharing based on above parameters on both the switches.
The more random variables going into the hash equation the more likely of an even distribution across links.
The src/dst ports in the equation gives us this randomization. If the same (static) variables go into the hash, the
same link is chosen.
Follow this link for more details:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/25sg/configuration/guide/cef.html#wp1150531
cheers,
sandeep

Start routine: only once per teh load but not once per data packet

Hi,
I would like to execute some code in start routine (in update rules) only once per the load but not once per the data packet.
How can I implement this.
Regards,

I once had that same requirement, but in a datasource in R3. I'm not sure if the same solution would work in BW, though. I used a memory id to keep the variable value between packets:
DATA: ... n_globalvar TYPE n ...
then I added...
IMPORT n_globalvar FROM MEMORY ID 'ZMEMID01'.
...at the start of the routine to retrieve to the variable the value from the memory id.
At the end of the code, I exported the variable back to the same memory id...
EXPORT n_globalvar to MEMORY ID 'ZMEMID01'.

CEF and per-packet load balancing

We have four OC3 links across the atlantic and I was looking for a solution which would allow load balacing across the four links on a per-packet basis (not session). The objective is both resiliency i.e. being able to handle link failures transparently & balancing the load across all the links. BGP multptah looked like the ideal soultion. However, I was told that the CEF packet based load balancing is no longer supported by CISCO. Is this correct ? Is it applicable for all models ? Are there any other potential solutions?
Appreciate a response from the experts.

Hello Rittick,
an MPLS pseudowire will use only one link of the 4 links based on inner MPLS label, it cannot be spread over multiple parallel links.
The MPLS pseudowire can travel within an MPLS TE LSP that can be protected by FRR.
per packet load balancing does not apply to your scenario.
You need to mark traffic of the critical application with an appropriate EXP settings. The EXP bits are copied to the outer (external) label.
On the OC-3 physical interfaces you will configure a CBWFQ scheduler providing 100 Mbps of bandwidth to traffic with specific EXP marking. This is elastic and over unused links bandwidth will be left available to other traffic.
On the LAN interface you need to mark the EXP bits in received packets using a policy-map
access-list 101 permit tcp host x.x.x.x host y,y,y,y
class CLASSIFY-BACKUP
match access-group 101
policy-map MARKER
class CLASSIFY-BACKUP
set mpls exp 3
class class-default
set mpls exp 0
int gex/y/z
service-policy in MARKER
class-map BACKUP
match mpls exp 3
policy-map SCHED-OC3
class BACKUP
bandwidth 100000
class class-default
fair-queue
int posx/y/z
service-policy out SCHED-OC3
applied on all pos interfaces. The MPLS pseudowire will use one link only. Different pseudowires can use different OC-3 links. Load balancing of MPLS traffic is based on internal label (the VC label of the pseudowire)
Note:
you should check if it is possible to mark traffic received on the incoming interface of the pseudowire otherwise you need to mark IP precedence nearer to the host.
Hope to help
Giuseppe

CEF Load Sharing Recursive Lookup

Hi,
i have this scenario:
| ----P1----P2---|
PE1----| |----PE2
| ----P3----P4---|
IP Loop PE1: 5.5.5.5
There are 2 Gigabitethernet betweenn the router PE and the router P.
PE1 advertise 1.1.1.1/32 to PE2:
PE2#sh ip route 1.1.1.1
Routing entry for 1.1.1.1/32
Known via "bgp 65000", distance 200, metric 0, type internal
Last update from 5.5.5.5 01:57:03 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 5.5.5.5, from 4.4.4.4 , 01:57:03 ago
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
AS Hops 0, BGP network version 0
PE2 has 4 link (2 towards P2 and 2 towards P4) at equal cost to reach 5.5.5.5/32 via OSPF:
PE2# sh ip route 5.5.5.5
Routing entry for 5.5.5.5/32
Known via "ospf 65000", distance 110, metric 200, type inter area
Last update from 23.23.23.24 on GigabitEthernet8/0/0, 01:13:45 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 22.22.22.21, from IP-P1, 01:13:45 ago, via GigabitEthernet3/0/0
Route metric is 200, traffic share count is 1
23.23.23.23, from IP-P1, 01:13:45 ago, via GigabitEthernet8/0/0
Route metric is 200, traffic share count is 1
22.22.22.22, from IP-P2, 01:13:45 ago, via GigabitEthernet3/0/0
Route metric is 200, traffic share count is 1
23.23.23.24, from IP-P2, 01:13:45 ago, via GigabitEthernet8/0/0
Route metric is 200, traffic share count is 1
If I look cef table I have all the 4 link too:
PE2# sh ip cef 5.5.5.5
5.5.5.5/32, version 3101050, epoch 0, per-destination sharing
0 packets, 0 bytes
Flow: AS 0, mask 32
tag information set, shared, all rewrites owned
local tag: 1541
via 22.22.22.21, GigabitEthernet3/0/0, 14 dependencies
traffic share 1
next hop 22.22.22.21, GigabitEthernet3/0/0
valid adjacency
tag rewrite with Gi3/0/0, 22.22.22.21, tags imposed {390}
via 23.23.23.23, GigabitEthernet8/0/0, 14 dependencies
traffic share 1
next hop 23.23.23.23, GigabitEthernet8/0/0
valid adjacency
tag rewrite with Gi8/0/0, 23.23.23.23, tags imposed {390}
via 22.22.22.22, GigabitEthernet3/0/0, 15 dependencies
traffic share 1
next hop 22.22.22.22, GigabitEthernet3/0/0
valid adjacency
tag rewrite with Gi3/0/0, 22.22.22.22, tags imposed {390}
via 23.23.23.24, GigabitEthernet8/0/0, 15 dependencies
traffic share 1
next hop 23.23.23.24, GigabitEthernet8/0/0
valid adjacency
tag rewrite with Gi8/0/0, 23.23.23.24, tags imposed {390}
0 packets, 0 bytes switched through the prefix
tmstats: external 0 packets, 0 bytes
internal 0 packets, 0 bytes
But if i Look the cef table for the address 1.1.1.1/32 I have only 1 link:
PE2# sh ip cef 1.1.1.1
1.1.1.1/32, version 6477717, epoch 0, per-destination sharing
0 packets, 0 bytes
Flow: AS 0, mask 32
tag information from 5.5.5.5/32, shared, all rewrites owned
local tag: 1541
via 5.5.5.5, 0 dependencies, recursive
next hop 22.22.22.22, GigabitEthernet3/0/0 via 5.5.5.5/32 (Default)
valid adjacency
tag rewrite with Gi3/0/0, 22.22.22.21, tags imposed {390}
Recursive load sharing using 5.5.5.5/32.
The question is: why PE2 doesn't utilize all the 4 link (towards P2 and P4) to reach 1.1.1.1/32?
Thanks in advance
Rgds
Gianluca

Although the "show ip cef 1.1.1.1" command only displays one interface, the recursive loadsharing will take place as expected.
Do a "show ip cef 1.1.1.1 internal", which will show you the 4 outbound interfaces being used.
Hope this helps,

Load sharing in CISCO 12000 XR

Hi All,
How can I change the load sharing algoritham to per-packet in 12000 GSR IOS XR 4.0.1
Thanks,
Arun Mohan

Hi,
you can use below command to acheive load balancing across equal cost links.
cef load-balancing fields L3/L4 ###L3 is default

Hrsp load sharing

Hello,
If I have two nics on a server and two core switches running hrsp with load sharing. If I connect each nic to each core. So nic 1 goes to core switch 1 and nic 2 goes core switch 2. My question does hrsp load sharing let both nics send traffic or only one nic is receiving and other nic sending how does that work with packet flow. Also what happened if I team the nic cards?
Thanks,

Hello, what are your core switches? and how are you achieving load sharing? With the old HSRP (i.e. not advanced like N7K's or perhaps N5K's too) you have one active and one standby. So one of the core switches will always be an active gateway which will take the responsibility of routing traffic etc.. So this isn't really load-sharing. Unless you are load sharing several VLAN's to the server nics.
If you team the cards, in standard configuration, you will see mac flaps on the core switches, which isn't so good when forwarding traffic to the server vice versa.
hth.

Svcadm: error while loading shared libraries: libz.so.1: cannot open shared

Ops center 12c installation last stage we are getting below error :
INFO: starting new satellite SMF services
satadm: Enable HTML redirect
satadm: Disabling application/scn/ec-server-splashpage
/opt/sun/xvmoc/bin/svcadm: error while loading shared libraries: libz.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
satadm: ERROR: application/scn/ec-server-splashpage failed to stop
satadm: Starting Enterprise Controller with SMFlite...
svcadm: error while loading shared libraries: libz.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
satadm: ERROR: Error enabling Enterprise Controller run-time milestone svc:/application/scn/satellite-enable:default (rc=127)
Error: starting satellite services
Command: /opt/sun/xvmoc/bin/satadm start -v -w
Exit code: 1
Output:
Please fix the problem and then try this step again.
For a full log of the failed install see the file: /var/tmp/installer.log.14112.
t. Try this step again (correct the failure before proceeding)
x. Exit

Hi Valentin
The copy error occurs when you try to copy the files to the main OS that has allocated the VM ?
Because another option is to get those files toward the VM across and ftp server. You could use
an ftp server installed in the main machine or in the network where you are connected o inclusive from
your mail if you have connection to internet.
Joel Perez
Oracle Ace Member
DBA Oracle

MP-BGP and MPLS multipath load sharing

Hi,
I am trying to PoC MPLS multi path load sharing by using per-PE-per-VRF RDs in the network.
I have a simple lab setup with AS65000 which consists of SITE1 PE1&PE2 routers (10.250.0.101 and 10.250.0.102), route reflector RR in the middle (10.250.0.55) and SITE2 PE1&PE2 routers (10.250.0.201 and 10.250.0.202). PE routers only do iBGP peering with centralized route reflector and passing route to 10.1.1.0/24 prefix (learned from single CE router) with 100:1 and 100:2 RDs for specific VRF.
Route reflector gets routes with multiple RDs, makes copies of these routes in order to make local comparison to RD 55:55 configured, uses these routes and install multiple paths into its routing table (all PE routers and RR have "maximum-paths eibgp 4" configured):
RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 10.250.0.55
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 55:55 (default for vrf VRF-A) VRF Router ID 10.250.0.55
* i10.1.1.0/24      10.250.0.102             0    100      0 65001 i
*>i                 10.250.0.101             0    100      0 65001 i
Route Distinguisher: 100:1
*>i10.1.1.0/24      10.250.0.101             0    100      0 65001 i
Route Distinguisher: 100:2
*>i10.1.1.0/24      10.250.0.102             0    100      0 65001 i
RR#sh ip route vrf VRF-A
<output omitted>
     10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
B       10.1.1.0/24 [200/0] via 10.250.0.102, 00:45:52
                          [200/0] via 10.250.0.101, 00:46:22
BUT, for some reason RR doest reflects routes with multiple RDs down to SITE2 PE1&PE2 - its own clients:
RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.201 advertised-routes
Total number of prefixes 0
RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.202 advertised-routes
Total number of prefixes 0
Here comes RR BGP configuration:
router bgp 65000
no synchronization
bgp router-id 10.250.0.55
bgp cluster-id 1.1.1.1
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 10.250.0.101 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.250.0.101 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 10.250.0.101 route-reflector-client
neighbor 10.250.0.101 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor 10.250.0.102 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.250.0.102 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 10.250.0.102 route-reflector-client
neighbor 10.250.0.102 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor 10.250.0.201 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.250.0.201 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 10.250.0.201 route-reflector-client
neighbor 10.250.0.201 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor 10.250.0.202 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.250.0.202 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 10.250.0.202 route-reflector-client
neighbor 10.250.0.202 soft-reconfiguration inbound
no auto-summary
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 10.250.0.101 activate
neighbor 10.250.0.101 send-community both
neighbor 10.250.0.102 activate
neighbor 10.250.0.102 send-community both
neighbor 10.250.0.201 activate
neighbor 10.250.0.201 send-community both
neighbor 10.250.0.202 activate
neighbor 10.250.0.202 send-community both
exit-address-family
address-family ipv4 vrf VRF-A
maximum-paths eibgp 4
no synchronization
bgp router-id 10.250.0.55
network 10.255.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255
exit-address-family
SITE1 PE1 configuration:
router bgp 65000
no synchronization
bgp router-id 10.250.0.101
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 10.250.0.55 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.250.0.55 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 10.250.0.55 soft-reconfiguration inbound
no auto-summary
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 10.250.0.55 activate
neighbor 10.250.0.55 send-community both
exit-address-family
address-family ipv4 vrf VRF-A
neighbor 10.1.101.2 remote-as 65001
neighbor 10.1.101.2 activate
neighbor 10.1.101.2 soft-reconfiguration inbound
maximum-paths eibgp 4
no synchronization
bgp router-id 10.250.0.101
exit-address-family
SITE1 PE2 configuration is similar to SITE1 PE1. They both do eBGP peering with dualhomed CE router in AS65001 which announces 10.1.1.0/24 prefix into VRF-A table.
My question is: clearly, the issue is that RR doesn't reflect any routes to its clients (SITE2 PE1&PE2) for 10.1.1.0/24 prefix with 100:1 and 100:2 RDs that dont match it's locally configured RD 55:55 for VRF-A, although they are present in its BGP/RIB tables and used for multipathing. Is this an expected behavior or some feature limitation for specific platform or IOS version? Currently, in this test lab setup I run IOS 12.4(24)T8 on all the devices.
Please, let me know if any further details are needed to get an idea of why this well known and widely used feature is not working correctly in my case. Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Sergey

Hi Ashish,
I tried to remove VRF and address family configurations completely from RR.
router bgp 65000
no synchronization
bgp router-id 10.250.0.55
bgp cluster-id 1.1.1.1
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 10.250.0.101 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.250.0.101 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 10.250.0.101 route-reflector-client
neighbor 10.250.0.101 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor 10.250.0.102 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.250.0.102 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 10.250.0.102 route-reflector-client
neighbor 10.250.0.102 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor 10.250.0.201 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.250.0.201 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 10.250.0.201 route-reflector-client
neighbor 10.250.0.201 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor 10.250.0.202 remote-as 65000
neighbor 10.250.0.202 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 10.250.0.202 route-reflector-client
neighbor 10.250.0.202 soft-reconfiguration inbound
no auto-summary
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 10.250.0.101 activate
neighbor 10.250.0.101 send-community both
neighbor 10.250.0.102 activate
neighbor 10.250.0.102 send-community both
neighbor 10.250.0.201 activate
neighbor 10.250.0.201 send-community both
neighbor 10.250.0.202 activate
neighbor 10.250.0.202 send-community both
exit-address-family
After this, RR doesn't accept any routes at all from S1PE1&S1PE2 routers, thus not reflecting any routes down to its clients S2PE1&S2PE2 as well:
S1PE1#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.250.0.101
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 100:1 (default for vrf VRF-A) VRF Router ID 10.250.0.101
*> 10.1.1.0/24      10.1.101.2               0             0 65001 i
S1PE1#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.55 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.250.0.101
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 100:1 (default for vrf VRF-A) VRF Router ID 10.250.0.101
*> 10.1.1.0/24      10.1.101.2               0             0 65001 i
Total number of prefixes 1
S1PE2#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.250.0.102
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 100:2 (default for vrf VRF-A) VRF Router ID 10.250.0.102
*> 10.1.1.0/24      10.1.201.2               0             0 65001 i
S1PE2#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.55 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.250.0.102
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 100:2 (default for vrf VRF-A) VRF Router ID 10.250.0.102
*> 10.1.1.0/24      10.1.201.2               0             0 65001 i
Total number of prefixes 1
RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.101 routes
Total number of prefixes 0
RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.102 routes
Total number of prefixes 0
Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks.
Regards,
Sergey

MPLS Traffic Load Sharing

What is the best way to configure a load sharing policy from multiple CE "remotes" to two CE "hosts" in a MPLS network? Currently, all incoming traffic goes to only one host from the PE.

Hi,
you need to have a look at the complete routing architecture to understand possibilities/responsibilities.
Mainly load distribution for a single prefix can only occur, if more than one path to a destination is known. This however might not be given in the MPLS network. The underlying reason is that BGP will only send the best path in an update - but not all pathes a BGP speaker knows of (RFC mandates this).
As practically all larger BGP implementations use Route Reflectors, which are (RFC conforming) BGP speakers, they will only forward the best path to a destination. The result is:
IF more than one path to a destination network exists and is sent to the RR through different PE routers (with same RD) then only one path will be distributed to all other PE routers.
In this scenario load sharing for a single prefix can not occur, because only one routing table entry exists for this prefix in most if not all PE routers. All you can do is to try to load share by selecting different pathes for different destination prefixes by influencing routing metric. This way part of your traffic will go one way and part will take another path.
IF the SP however uses different RD values for every VRF and the proper "maximum-path" statements in MP-BGP, then load sharing per prefix can be achieved in the MPLS network. The customer however can not influence the SP setup.
Hope this Helps! Please rate all posts.
Regards, Martin

[appldev@oracletrng5 ~]$ ./startAPP /bin/sh: error while loading shared lib

Hi hussein,
I got error when I startup my new cloned Oracle apps 11i in OEL5.6
[appldev@oracletrng5 ~]$ ./startAPP
/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libdl.so.2:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directoryOr all command line (like "ls", "cat", etc) throws this error :(
But if I am a "root" user I can run this.
Please help...
Thanks
Edited by: crystal on Feb 18, 2011 5:53 PM

Hi hussein,
It seems only the discoverer start script got error. The metalink notes said:
Oracle Discoverer 4i is not certified with Oracle Applications 11i since December 2006.
Solution
To implement the solution, please execute the following steps:
1. Upgrade Discoverer to version 10.1.2 or later as per Note 313418.1
Using Discoverer 10.1.2 with Oracle E-Business Suite 11i. I think we are not using discover. Do I need to fix it?
But the start all script has status "1" at the end of run. which meant not successful.
Below is the complete log of start all script:
[appldev@oracletrng5 ~]$ ./startAPP
You are running adstrtal.sh version 115.16
Executing service control script:
/u01/appldev/devcomn/admin/scripts/DEV_oracletrng5/adapcctl.sh start
script returned:
adapcctl.sh version 115.50
Apache Web Server Listener is not running.
Starting Apache Web Server Listener (dedicated HTTP) ...
Apache Web Server Listener (PLSQL) is not running.
Starting Apache Web Server Listener (dedicated PLSQL) ...
adapcctl.sh: exiting with status 0
.end std out.
.end err out.
Executing service control script:
/u01/appldev/devcomn/admin/scripts/DEV_oracletrng5/adalnctl.sh start
script returned:
adalnctl.sh version
Checking for FNDFS executable.
Starting listener process APPS_DEV.
adalnctl.sh: exiting with status 0
.end std out.
.end err out.
Executing service control script:
/u01/appldev/devcomn/admin/scripts/DEV_oracletrng5/adcmctl.sh start
script returned:
You are running adcmctl.sh version 115.28
Starting concurrent manager for DEV ...
Starting DEV_0220@DEV Internal Concurrent Manager
Default printer is noprint
adcmctl.sh: exiting with status 0
.end std out.
.end err out.
Executing service control script:
/u01/appldev/devcomn/admin/scripts/DEV_oracletrng5/adfrmctl.sh start
script returned:
You are running adfrmctl.sh version 115.37
Starting forms server for DEV on port 9000.
adfrmctl.sh: exiting with status 0
.end std out.
.end err out.
Executing service control script:
/u01/appldev/devcomn/admin/scripts/DEV_oracletrng5/adrepctl.sh start
script returned:
You are running adrepctl.sh version 115.32
starting Reports Server for DEV on port 7000.
adrepctl.sh: exiting with status 0
.end std out.
.end err out.
Executing service control script:
/u01/appldev/devcomn/admin/scripts/DEV_oracletrng5/adfmcctl.sh start
script returned:
You are running adfmcctl.sh version 115.19
Starting forms load balancing client for DEV.
adfmcctl.sh: exiting with status 0
.end std out.
.end err out.
Executing service control script:
/u01/appldev/devcomn/admin/scripts/DEV_oracletrng5/adfmsctl.sh start
script returned:
You are running adfmsctl.sh version 115.15
starting forms metrics server for DEV.
adfmsctl.sh: exiting with status 0
.end std out.
.end err out.
Executing service control script:
/u01/appldev/devcomn/admin/scripts/DEV_oracletrng5/jtffmctl.sh start
script returned:
You are running jtffmctl.sh version 115.16
Validating Fulfillment patch level via /u01/appldev/devcomn/java
Fulfillment patch level validated.
Starting Fulfillment Server for DEV on port 9300 ...
jtffmctl.sh: exiting with status 0
.end std out.
.end err out.
Executing service control script:
/u01/appldev/devcomn/admin/scripts/DEV_oracletrng5/addisctl.sh start
script returned:
addisctl.sh version 115.15
/u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/vbroker/bin/osagent
Started osagent.
Osagent logs messages to the file /u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/discwb4/util/osagent.log.
Waiting for OAD to start...
Started OAD.
OAD logs messages to the file /u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/discwb4/util/oad.log.
Failed to start locator.
Cannot bind to OAD. Re-starting...
OAD is stopped
Osagent is stopped
Unable to stop locator. No process-id file found.
Unable to stop gatekeeper. No process-id file found.
Unable to stop any Discoverer Sessions. No process-id file found.
Unable to stop any Discoverer Preference. No process-id file found.
Unable to stop any Discoverer Collector. No process-id file found.
/u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/vbroker/bin/osagent
Started osagent.
Osagent logs messages to the file /u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/discwb4/util/osagent.log.
Waiting for OAD to start...
Started OAD.
OAD logs messages to the file /u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/discwb4/util/oad.log.
Failed to start locator.
Registering Discoverer Session
Registering the Collector
Applying preferences from file : /u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/discwb4/util/pref.txt
Finished applying preferences
Registering Discoverer Preference Repository
addisctl.sh: exiting with status 1
.end std out.
/u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/jre1183o/lib/i686/green_threads/libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so)
Unable to initialize threads: cannot find class java/lang/Thread
Could not create Java VM
/u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/jre1183o/lib/i686/green_threads/libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so)
Unable to initialize threads: cannot find class java/lang/Thread
Could not create Java VM
/u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/jre1183o/lib/i686/green_threads/libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so)
Unable to initialize threads: cannot find class java/lang/Thread
Could not create Java VM
/u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/jre1183o/lib/i686/green_threads/libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so)
Unable to initialize threads: cannot find class java/lang/Thread
Could not create Java VM
/u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/jre1183o/lib/i686/green_threads/libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so)
Unable to initialize threads: cannot find class java/lang/Thread
Could not create Java VM
/u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/jre1183o/lib/i686/green_threads/libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so)
Unable to initialize threads: cannot find class java/lang/Thread
Could not create Java VM
./applypreferences.sh: line 26: 31747: Memory fault
/u01/appldev/devora/8.0.6/jre1183o/lib/i686/green_threads/libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so)
Unable to initialize threads: cannot find class java/lang/Thread
Could not create Java VM
.end err out.
Check logfile /u01/appldev/devcomn/admin/log/DEV_oracletrng5/02200048.log for details
Exiting with status 1What is this about? >./applypreferences.sh: line 26: 31747: Memory fault
Thanks a lot

AP- load sharing

Hi all,
Is there a way to achieve AP load-sharing when we utilise AP groups?
This will make life easy from both designers and implementers as we will not have to worry about subnet allocation etc.
Thanks in advance.
janesh

yes i'm talking about having different AP groups per floor and replicating it across multiple floors.
yestersay u mentioned that u got a 802.11ac- would you be able to let me know the exact ordering code pls?

Error while loading shared libraries: librt.so.1: cannot open shared object

error while loading shared libraries: librt.so.1: cannot open shared object
I cant run my apache server v2.2.3.
Can someone help me?
thanks in advance

That could be an accessibility issue. Check the user with whom you installed Apache server. Check the user has permissions to access the libraries.
-Mahendra.

Packet per packet load sharing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for