Packing the inbound delivery
Hi all
I am following a template which mentions
1)perform a goods recpt.(MIGO/ 'other'), with some system relevant data
2)pack the inbound delivery (vl32n)
afaik , by executing step 1, we get a Material document #, but step 2 needs an inbound delivery. so where did this happen between point 1 & 2 ?
or is the inbound delivery mentioned somewhere in the mat. doc ?
Thanks
Hi,
my situation is:
- a WM managed warehouse, society A;
- a HU managed warehouse (without WM), society B;
- a purchasing process of HU from society A towards society B.
Society B have a scheduling agreement; when a delivery schedule appears, in society A born a sales order and a delivery. After the registration of the delivery good issue, an idoc transfer information for inbound delivery creation.
This process is ok without WM, but with a WM managed warehouse the idoc has the following problem:
"V51VP - item was not found - process cancelled".
Can you help me to transfer these HU?
Similar Messages
-
FM/BAPI for Packing in Inbound Delivery
Hi,
I can´t find a FM/BAPI for packing of handling units in the inbound delivery.
Is there any information that you can help me with?
BR,
ChristianCheck if this works for u.
BAPI_HU_PACK -
HU : external HU to be packed in inbound delivery
hi experts,
scenario : process order goods receipt will be done to HU managed sloc. no WM inegration .
inbound delivery will be created at the time of proces order GR.
we will get HU number from legacy , we need to pack that HU in the inbound delivery . there is no manual intervation .
request you to please how can have the HU in the inbound delivery which FM or Badi can help me . also need to pack it .
Regards,
satishUse BAPI To crete external handling iunits in SAP.Get the Idoc from legasy system pass the HU information .
Use BAPI HU Create it should work to update the handling units in delivery.
HU_BASIC_BAPIS Basic BAPIs for HUs
BAPI_HU_CHANGE_HEADER Change Handling Unit Header Data
BAPI_HU_CREATE Create Handling Unit with Items
BAPI_HU_DELETE BAPI for Deleting Handling Units
BAPI_HU_DISPLAY_HISTORY Displays HU History
BAPI_HU_GETLIST Read Handling Units from the Database
BAPI_HU_GET_LIST_MSG Select Handling Unit Output
BAPI_HU_PACK BAPI for Packing an Item into an HU
BAPI_HU_PROCESS_MSG HU Output Processing
BAPI_HU_PROCESS_MSG_DIRECT Select and Process Handling-Unit Outputs
BAPI_HU_REPACK Repack HUs and HU Items
BAPI_HU_UNPACK BAPI for Unpacking an Item from an HU
BOR_HU_DISPLAY Display an HU in Dialog Mode -
Need help in updating Inco terms 1 and 2 in the Inbound delivery creation
Hi Group,
I have created an output type that will be triggered before an Inbound Delivery is created from the Outbound Delivery ( this scenario is in STO orders - Inter company stock transfer process ).
I have copied a standard processing routine and customized it but, I am not able to update the 2 fileds (INCO1 and INCO2) in the item delivery of the Inbound Delivery. I was using the FM 'WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE' to update these 2 fields( by passsing the values fetched from the Outbound Delivery into the structure 'vbkok_wa' and the Inbound delivery created into the field 'delivery' of the FM ).
When I run the the FM this is giving me errors and thus no Inbound Delivery is getting created.
Please suggest me with some other way of updating these fields in the Inbound Delivery.
and one more thing is that, I was selecting the Inco terms from the table LIKP directly, but this should not be the proper way to read the Incoterms, so please suggest me a way to read these 2 fields from the Outbound Delivery.
to summarize, I need an FM to get the Incoterms from Outbound Delivery initially, and then, require another FM to update these Incoterms in the Inbound Delivery( this is a typical scenario in an STO - Stock Transport Order ).
Please let me know your input on these 2 cases.
Thanks for the help in advance.
Regards
Vishnu.Hi Group,
By implementing the BADI 'LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC' this particular requirement can be fulfilled.
Regards
Vishnu. -
Vendor batch and batch field on the inbound delivery
hi GUrus,
i have looked through most of the threads where the topic of vendor batch and batch on the inbound delviery has comeup. I'm specifically looking at a scneario where i would want to pass the on the batch number provided by the vendor on the IDOC to batch field on the inbound delivery. The reason for this is , i can look at the batch field in the confirmations tab of the PO, in the purchase order histroy tab of the PO, and also MMBE tcode. the material is also batch managed turned on in hte material master. But the issue is that even though i put the batch provided by vendor in the CHARG field on the ASN IDOC, it is still getting populated in the vendor batch field in the inbound delivery.
any ideas?
Thanks
RaviHi,
Refer the note: 833668 - Creating batches in the inbound delivery using IDOC which explains the system design.
Regards,
AKPT -
Dates on the inbound delivery header
Hi Gurus,
Can anybody please explain me what is the use of dates tab on the inbound delivery header. What is it used for? How can we activate/populate this. We are looking for the ASN functionality to be turned on. Any help is greatly appreciated
Thanks
AnushaPicking = planned time to start picking
Trans. Planning = planned time to start processing shipment
Loading = planned time for loading
Planned GI = planned goods issue date
Delivery Date = planned date to deliver
The dates can be used for planning various warehouse activities and they should be populated by the system when the delivery is released based on entries maintained in the sales order.
The dates can all be the same or different depending on your needs. They are used for various things (depending on your config) we use the planned goods issue date to show the date we want to the delivery to ship and we us the transportation planning date (same as planned goods issue) to calculate transit time for revenue recognition.
basically delivery processing, shipping scheduling dates that can be used or not depending on your needs -
Problem in posting the goods receipt with reference to the inbound delivery
Hi All,
Below is the explanation of the scenario:
1. Materials are purchased (PO created in CAS as order unit) and inbound delivery document is created in cases as well.
2. When the TO is created for put away (we are performing put away using the hand held devices) the line item is split resulting in new line item number created
3. When the TO is confirmed the del quantity on the split line item is zeroing out and as a result the system is treating it as a service item with zero del quantity and is stopping from performing the GR with respect to the inbound delivery document
And also the inbound delivery is disappearing from the confirmation tab on the PO)
This is happening only with the materials which have an alternate unit set up in the material master (in this scenario CAS is the order unit and JAR is the base unit of measure)
Can some one help fix this?Hi,
There is no standard option available and I don't think that there is any feasible way of stopping this without the use of a user exit (as already suggested).
But even the user exit option would be complex because it would have to block off the PO number field after enter (or any other key) was pressed.
It would also have to stop the use of multiple entries via the "find" option.
If you have a valid reason for doing this, have you thought of trying to get your users to do as they are told instead of changing the system?
Why is it important to have one PO per GR ?
Steve B -
Create Third Party Invoice after the Inbound Delivery Creation
Hello,
We have a requirement in 3rd party order process, where create invoice with reference to 3rd party order/ items after the inbound delivery completion.
Normally 3rd party invoice creation will be done after the MIRO transaction.
For this, I have checked the Item category billing relevance & copy controls between OR & F2, TAS and I couldnt get any idea for this requirement.
Please let me know if you have an Idea.
Regards
Suresh.dear friend,
the following info would help:
If relevance for billing indicator for the item category has been set to B (relevant for order-related billing on the basis of the order quantity) in Customizing, the system includes the order in the billing due list immediately. If, however, the indicator has been set to F (relevant to order-related billing on the basis of the invoice quantity), the system does not include the order in the billing due list until an invoice from the vendor has been received and processed by the purchasing department. In the standard system, item category TAS (third-party order processing) has been given billing-relevance indicator F.
In the first case, the third-party order is considered to be completely billed only when the invoiced quantity equals the order quantity of the sales order item. In the second case, each time a vendor invoice is received, a customer invoice is created for the quantity in the vendor invoice and the order is considered to be fully invoiced until the next vendor invoice is received.
If you have activated billing-relevance indicator F for item categories in Customizing, billing can refer to the goods receipt quantity instead of the incoming invoice quantity.
You can control whether the invoice receipt quantity or the quantity of goods received is relevant for billing in Customizing for copying control for billing at item level.
regards, -
How to skip the Inbound Delivery while updating LA confirmations via EDI
Hi Experts,
I have a requirement wherein I dont want to create Inbound Delivery automatically when updating the LA (or a copied Conf Cat of LA) confirmation via EDI. When we are using the message type DESADV, LA confirmations are being updated, but simultaneously, the Inbound delivery also being created. My client desires that Inbound Delivery should not happen and only LA confirmation should be updated via EDI.
Is there anyway, by which we can skip the Inbound Delivery while updating the LA confirmations in the PO?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Radha KrishnaHi Prabhaharan,
Thanks for your quick response.
My requirement is to have both AB and LA confirmations. I have included these two in a new the conf control So, your suggestion will not work.
Is there any other way out to fulfill my requirement?
Thanks & Regards
Radha Krishna -
After reversing the Inbound delivery in VL09, lock in LT0G
Hi,
I am canceling a Inbound delivery (Plant - WM managed) thru VL09 and then trying return to stock using LT0G.
But I am getting lock, unable to reverse stock/TO , and the log says " Scheduled quantity exceeds available/picked quantity ".
LS24 shows no stock available for the material in the Storage type,
but surprisingly this LT0G some times works fine & some times show this lock and unable to proceed further.
What is the setting or process missing? are we not suppose to use VL09 and LT0G subsequently?
Is there any other better way to do this? and what is the proper way to do this?
Appreciate your suggestions to either unlock the item or reverse the stock or unpick the qty in the Inbound delivery.
Thankyou,
RaviHi Chris,
Please find the detailed process steps in my scenario
Creation process:
1. Create Inbound delivery : VL31N & save it.
2. VL32N- and then subsequent function- create TO & save it.
After confirmation of the TO, the below happens in background.
TO - Putaway the stock from 902 to 011 storage type.
3. VL32N - PGR.(Post Goods Receipt)
Cancelation process:
Successful Example: (pre-existing stock)
1. VL09 - Cancelation successful
2. LT0G - Successful.
Before PGR: LS24 Stock
Inbound delivery qty =1
After TO created.
After TO confirmed
After PGR :LS24 Stock (Before VL09)
After VL09
After LT0G successful
After the TO is confirmed
Status overview screen -
FM or BAPI for (STATUS) PUTAWAY in the INBOUND DELIVERY
Good Day.
How can I change the status putaway in the inbound delivery using FM or BAPI?
Thank You.This question wasnt answered
-
BADI for VL31N which has the Inbound Delivery Number as a parameter.
Hi,
I have a requirement that after creation of a new inbound delivery through VL31N the control should go to a custom screen. The new inbound delivery no. generated thru VL31N should be seen in this custom screen.
I am searching for a user exit or BADI for VL31N. This exit should have the Inbound delivery Number created through VL31N.
I tried many exits and BADIs. However, none of them have the Inbound Delivery No.
Please help.
Regards,
JayaThe issue was resolved by the use of the BADI 'DELIVERY_PUBLISH'. Its method PUBLISH_AFTER_SAVE was used.
IF sy-tcode = 'VL31N' OR sy-tcode = 'VL32N'.
DATA : v_tcode TYPE sy-tcode .
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <i_del> TYPE likp.
DATA: wa_likp TYPE likp,
t_likp TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF likp.
ASSIGN ('(SAPMV50A)LIKP') TO <i_del>.
wa_likp = <i_del> .
SET PARAMETER ID 'VL' FIELD wa_likp-vbeln .
ENDIF. -
Assigning Handling Unit to the Inbound Delivery
Could anyone please give me an example of code (using FM 'ws_delivery_update' and probably others) to assign a HU created by transaction HU02 (status PLND)to the inbound delivery (like VL32N).
After such assignment I want to create an appropriate Transfer Order to move the HU to the warehouse. In my case ws_delivery_update doesn't update the HU positions table VEPO-VBELN.
When tried to use FM 'L_TO_CREATE_DN' it just showed an error saying that 'No items or handling units to be placed in storage could be determined'.What parameters have I missed? Please, help!
-
Choose the Inbound delivery type for STO process
Hey guys,
I am struggling with this process.
For STO process we are going to use SPED output type to create the Inbound delivery automatically after O/B delivery PGI.
The thing is I do not want the I/B Delivery type to be EL. Cause we are using HUM. I want it to be HID.
I can't find where in config I can't set up the system to choose HID rather than EL.
Does anyone have an idea?
Cheers GuysHi,
Thanks for your answer. But what you are describing is more for PO (external purchase) not STO.
What I want is to control the I/B delivery type that get created after PGI of the O/B delivery via the output type SPED (special function).
Cheers
Julien -
PO delivery date changed according to delivery date on the inbound delivery
Hi!
Initial PO date is changed according to the inbound delivery date when I create inbound delivery.
For example, initial PO has order qty. 1000 and delivery date 8/10/07.
And then I created inbound delivery for that PO with qty. 500 and changed delivery date to 8/5/07 on the inbodund delivery. Then when I check PO again, PO line item delivery date was changed to 8/5/07 which is
inbound delivery date. I think remaining 500 should have the same
delivery date originally assigned unless we change manually.
If somebody have experience, please let me know.
Thank you!Dear Wan Lee,
I think you also need to check for your Configuration setting for confirmation:IMGMM> Purchasing-->Confirmation.
Regards,
w1n
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hard drive and logic board failure
Hi everyone, we have been suffering from 4 dead hard drives and one logic board failure in 20-inch intel iMacs (~2007) recently and last month the logic board and hard drive of a 2010 27-inch iMac (just out of warranty) just died. Are there any known
-
Video Doesn't Work...Why?
I keep getting "there was a communications error in your chat" Here is the first half of the error message... Date/Time: 2008-12-19 21:28:12.428 -0500 OS Version: 10.5.6 (Build 9G55) Report Version: 4 iChat Connection Log: 2008-12-19 21:27:34 -0500:
-
I'm having trouble opening a word document on my new Macbook Pro. I opened it with no problems on my iPhone5. I tried using TextEdit and OpenOffice. Thanks!
-
Audio only dissolve???
In FCP 7 you could add an audio only dissolve by Option Command T This does not work in FCPX. Why not? How can you do this as simply in FCP X? I saw one explanation of how to do one on Creative Cow but it was a ridiculous 5 step process for a simple
-
Picture in Picture (PIP) feature discontinued
Can anyone tell me when & why Toshiba discontinued the PIP feature on its CRT color sets? My older set (CF27F50; October 1996) has the feature. A newer set I stumbled onto (27A43; October 2003) does not have it. Also, it's my impression that - for s