Paint bucket

At my new work they use Illustrator Cs4 and shabam you guys removed the Paint Bucket.
What where yuo thinking? So tell me how must I now just add a color to something with 1 click because the live bucket is stupid.
Also how do I get into the properties of layers?
Cs4 is so confusing..
And wheres the retancler tool and the costum shape tool?
I'm very lost in it...

Perhaps you should have told the people at work you were not familiar with Illustrator or at least you make it sound that way.
The Live Paint tool is great and if you want to fill an object(s) with a color you can drag a swatch to it or select a group of objects and hit a swatch or anywhere in the color picker in the colors panel all the fills ill change to that color.
No need for  bucket tool. Same goes for a stroke.
The live paint tool is great as it even allows you to fill an object in such a way as also act like a pathfinder tool and you can fill objects with fills of none making those areas transparent.
Layers properties how did you do such a thing in earlier versions? You can expand a layer and see the the groups and paths and sublayers.
The little triangle to the left of the name.
There is a drop down menu as well from the upper right hand corner.
What you need is Mordy Golding's book Real World Illustrator.

Similar Messages

  • Photoshop CC 2014 Paint bucket doesn't work

    I am just trying to fill a layer with the foreground color using the paint bucket.   I have the layer set to Normal 100% opacity and the paint bucket set to foreground 100% opacity, Normal mode. But I get zero. No color at all. The layers panel does show the color, just not the screen.
    Also--no color in the paint brushes and no pattern fill. Basically nothing paints on that layer.
    If I unlock the background layer and make it editable, I can use the paint bucket and brushes on that layer, no problem. But not on any layers above that.
    If I drag the background layer up to make it the top layer, I can paint on it one time.  If I change color, change tools, or start another layer. the bucket, brushes, etc. cease to work on that layer.  The only way to paint on a layer is to drag it down to make the bottom layer on the stack and paint on it there.
    For my purposes, this makes CC 2014 absolutely maddening, close to useless. Help!!!  I have been using PS for years and never had this problem til 2014.
    PS CC 2014, Win7 64 Wacom Intuos. Art pen. "Use windows ink" checked.

    Chris, Thank you soooooo much. I would never in a million years have guessed this was the problem. As it was, it took a few hours to find the drivers, install them and recalibrate my monitor. The bucket and brushes are behaving as they should on all layers. Saved so much time, missed deadlines. You have no idea.

  • My new blank file is suddenly gray and paint bucket no longer works correctly.

    Photoshop Elements 10.  I started a new blank file, which opened white, as usual.  I enclosed the file with the rectangular marquee tool, and used the paint bucket to fill the background with a brownish color I choose, except it filled with gray.  I looked to be sure the color mode was RBG color, and it is.  After a frustrating couple of attempts to change the color, I thought of a work around and just created a new layer and colored it, but, when I tried to change the color again, the paint bucket would not respond, so I created another layer and the paint bucket then changed the color for me again.  However, I really would prefer it work the way it did before, instead of creating unnecessary layers to do the job.  I insert a screen shot, if it helps.  Any help resolving this would be appreciated.

    I clicked on the arrow and reset the tool.  I also reset the transparency setting in preferences, which was the only color related setting I saw there, to no avail.  I opened another new file, same result, dumping the paint bucket produced only a grayscale color.  Thanks for the suggestion, however. 

  • How to select a shape from pen tool for paint bucket

    I was under the notion that I could make a shape with the pen tool and if I closed the the shape it would then be selected in a way that would allow me to color the interior with paint bucket.
    However, when I splash the paintbucket inside my shape, it paints the whole layer, not just the part inside my shape.
    Obviously I don't understand how it is supposed to work.
    Apparently I've gone at this the wrong way.. I want to create a freeform shape, that once created will be a selected region in the same way a rectangle or elips would.
    What is the best way to do that?  I'm shooting for thought bubble sort of shape, something along the line of the outline of an egg, but with a tail at one end.

    Added tips from Tip Merchant ($200 consulation fee)
    - on mac - command/ numeric keypad Enter turns the path into a selection. Option delete then fills.
    - an action can be setup to bring up Fill Path from the Path panel menu. Just pressing enter fills with FG color
    These are ways to avoid he paths panel altogether. Best way may be to use the TINY fill path icon in that panel as was pointed out by John

  • Photoshop CS4 type tool and paint bucket

    I am teaching Photoshop CS4 to my students and have started having problems I've never encountered.
    Problem #1 - Type tool won't work. We can create a text box and type in it. Text does not show on the document but does show in the layers palette. I've made sure the layer is on top, text is not too large for text box and font color contrasts the background. I've looked at the character and paragraph palettes looking for something unusual but have found nothing.
    Problem #2 - the paint bucket is "stuck" on one color. No matter which color swatch I choose, the color does not change. I have created new documents and also shut down and re-opened the program but that didn't help either.
    Has enyone encountered these problems? How did you solve the problem?

    the_wine_snob wrote:
    The Reset Preferences "three-finger salute" is for Windows. Press and hold all there, BEFORE you launch PS. Keep holding them down THROUGH the ENTIRE loading process.
    Depending on how you start Photoshop, holding the keys down ahead of time won't work on Windows 7, Bill (and I'm not sure, but possibly other versions of Windows as well).
    For example, double clicking an icon on the desktop with Control-Shift-Alt held down brings up the Properties of the icon.
    You actually have to press and hold the keys as soon as humanly possible after starting the app.  You have to be quick, but when you're quick enough you'll get...
    -Noel

  • Photoshop CC for Mac - why can't I use the paint bucket?

    I finally found the paint bucket tool - but when I try to use it, I get the circle w/ the cross in it (like the ghostbusters background ).
    EUREKA! it didn't work with .tif or .psd files, but it DID work w/ a .jpg file!
    Hopw this helps someone!

    The file format does not matter (once the image is loaded, it's just bits).
    The only time I know of that the paint bucket would not work is on a 32 bit/channel document.
    Were you using the wrong bit depth in your files by mistake?

  • How do you connect lines for a drawing in order to use the live paint bucket tool?

    Hello! Im fairly new (okay not really) to using adobe illustrator
    I used the Image trace tool to outline this drawing of Captain America but unfortunately the lines arent connected and therefore
    messes up my colouring completely when I use the Live Paint Bucket tool.
    Is there a way to connect the lines so they are closed when I colour it? Or is there another way to color this drawing?
    Help would be greatly appreciated!

    Those gaps are very wide. Draw some paths and apply no fill, no stroke to them.
    Then make the live paint. In case the live paint already exists, you can go into isolation mode and then draw the paths. Or draw them and use Object > Live paint > Merge

  • Splitting a Flattened Image into Layers so I can use the Paint Bucket to change colors

    I have what I think is a flattened image that is part of a Website template. (I'm assuming the image is flattened, because when I use the paint bucket to change the color, it colors the whole thing; and when I use the magic wand, the whole image is selected). I need to be able to use the paint bucket to change the colors. What do I have to do to make the image work that way? The image is made to look like you're looking left to right at four file folders. The folder labels are a different color. Is there some way to separate the folders (now in green), the folder labels (now in yellow), and the white background from each other, so I can apply the paint bucket to different layers later? I've worked on this for hours now, and can't seem to find the answer. I'll have to change the colors in the image at least 10 different times, so I was hoping I wouldn't have to resort to using the brush or pencil tools.

    Darlene,
    Another way is to use the Replace Color Tool. The Hue/Saturation method is probably easier, but I thought I'd mention Replace Color for your information.
    http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=18IBCKnJchzoxfLEaw7Bu93j9W5jS
    In my example I changed the 3rd label in your picture to red.
    1. Roughly select the label using the Lasso tools.
    2. Enchance>Adjust Color>Replace Color.
    3. Click on the label in the picture; it will appear in the box as white on black background. In general you would move the fuzziness slider until just the portion you wish to change appears white. In this case since the yellow is uniform with sharp border the fuzziness slider had minimal additional effect, but I did move it all the way right to capture the fringe pixels.
    4. Play with the 3 Transform sliders to get the desired result.
    In this next example I changed the top of the lighthouse from red to green (why I would want to do that, I don't know!).
    http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1XhqCAvgc0zVWReJDkUB2OLDQChSy
    Note that in this case I didn't have to move the fuzziness all the way right.

  • Live Paint Bucket in CS5

    Using Illustrator on a Windows box running XP sp3 with an Intuos 2
    I've been using Illustrator CS2 for awhile and have upgraded to CS5.  I need some help with a problem I'm experiencing with the Live Paint Bucket.    I select the illustration, go to Object > Live Paint > Make and get the Blue bouning box.  I choose my Fill and Stroke colors and go to work.  It seems to work until I get a closer view, around 800%, and then I notice that the stroke isn't filling in some of the strokes completely (there appear to be gaps within the Path that don't show in a normal view).  Its leaving artifacts (I don't know what else to call them) unstroked.  I've attached two two examples of these artifacts.  I've also tried to correct this with the Live Paint Selection Tool which I'm also having a problem with.  I've released the Live Paint group and checked that all my paths connect and have corrected any problems I can see.
    This hasn't helped either.   Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong.  I've consulted the Help and either I can't read English with comprehension or........I can't find the correct words to bring up the problem.
    I thank you in advance for any help you can give me.

    I'll try to help. Since I don't know what you expect to see, it is hard to say what you're doing wrong. The gold line end, in the top left boxed area, can be selected with the Live Paint Selection tool and either deleted or painted with "none". Clicking on the line can be tricking with the selection tool because it tends to select the fill instead. Zoom in and you will see when it's selected, then just hit "delete" or type "/" to assign a stroke color of "none" to the selection.
    You can also using the Live Paint Bucket tool to do this. With the Bucket tool active, hold "shift" to highlight strokes, then choose "none" and click. You can scroll through the color choices using the left and right arrow tools.
    I'm not sure what you want to change in the center section. Remember, you don't have to release the Live Paint object to make edits to the paths with the pen or pencil tools. They remain fully editable. You can also add new paths to the Live Paint object by either working in "isolation mode" or by dragging paths into the Live Paint object within the Layers Panel.

  • Live Paint Bucket tool Question

    Hello Illustrators.
    Its been a while since I've used this tool. But I'm facing an issue I cannot understand.
    I'm seeing some tutorials and as I try to follow along I cannot have the same functions of the tool as demonstrated.
    My live paint bucket tool does not have the same options as the tutor. He can swipe his arrow keys and get the colours from the colour pallet, while I only have one colour available.
    I have to continuously have to go to my colour pallet and choose a colour in order for my shapes to be filled. But when it comes to colouring a stroke of my shape then no problems I can swipe and get my colour
    selection. Id like to be able to use it for my fill colour as well to be swipe my arrow keys and see the colours available if it makes sense.
    Top Image is what Id like to achieve.
    The bottom image is what I have in my art board document. as seeing only one colour is available, and that I have to click on my colour pallet to get a colour. No swiping with arrow keys is available.
    Thank you.

    Hello Craig!
    yes it is! Its the 1st time I'm coming across this problem, I'm getting frustrated not being able to work this issue out...
    As you can see everything is checked.
    And also as you can see, like I was stating in my original post, the option to swipe with arrow keys only applies to the stroke of the shape, and not the fill.

  • When do we use Pentool, live paint bucket or brush?

    For example, I want to draw a bush
    I know there are many different ways to create: some use pen tool, some use live paint bucket tool, some use brush and eraser.
    No matter what methods we use, it all leads us to the same result. I want to draw as smart and convinient as much as possible. So I dont understand in which case what method we should use. I am recommended to use basic shapes as much as possible when drawing. But when drawing complex objects, it takes too much time to use basic shapes to create
    For example, In this case I think we should use brush and eraser
    I think that using pentool can make my work goes faster. But why do people use live paint bucket tool and when we need to use basic shapes to create objects?
    Is that right when I said that it depends on what style of art we are creating? (such as logo, flat UI design, artwork for children, ect...)
    *Question from a newbie to illustrator TT_TT*

    This is the kind of question I like most to see in drawing software forums and it's increasingly rare. So first, let me commend you for thinking in terms of seeking usual and customary best practice, rather than just assuming every whiz-bang, instant gratification cheap trick feature should be employed willy-nilly without ever a thought toward the elegance of your drawing's structure. It suggests you are serious about maintaining quality in your vector drawing, rather than just assuming anything that "looks good" on your monitor is "quality."
    Unfortunately, one could write a whole book on this. So I'll try to keep the following general and reasonably brief. That may make it sound a bit preachy. If you want to talk more specifics, continue the thread conversation.
    Vector drawing is, by its nature, an exacting medium. It strains against itself when it pretends to be "painterly."
    There is, of course, a balance between a strictly purist mindset and real-world practicality. The way to find your balance is to approach automated effects (especially new ones) with a healthy dose of skepticism. Try them, sure; but closely examine the results, tear them apart, and try to understand what's really going on.
    Regarding specific features you mention (Live Paint, Brush, Eraser), try them, examine the results, and consider whether the results are what you would expect if they'd been deliberately and efficently drawn. I find that Live Paint and Shape Builder (much the same thing) usually do a decent job of maintaining true-ness to the original paths, matching abutting edges which should be exactly identical without creation of many unnecessary anchors.
    I find much  the opposite to be true of features like Offset Path, Outline Stroke, and even moreso of features like Variable Strokes. Basically anything that involves automated enveloping (not just Envelopes, but also things like ArtBrushes) are suspect. I'm certainly not saying never use them, but be as aware as you can of what's going on. I leverage Artbrushes and Pattern Brushes to high advantage for certain things, but I do so knowingly, not willy-nilly. I rarely ever acutally use the Brush or Pencil or Blob Tools. I create the artwork contained in the Brushes as cleanly as possible and apply the Brush to deliberately-drawn paths.
    Much has to do with the intended practical uses of the final artwork. For example, overlapping paths is standard fare for artwork destined for print. It's a functional deal-breaker for artwork that wil also be used to drive a cutter/plotter for signage. (Just one reason why proper logo master files should be as cleanly constructed as possible.)
    Automated routines--no matter how seemingly "powerful"--do not have human discernment. The poster-child example of this is autotracing. An autotracing feature doesn't know a round iris from a hex bolt. The autotracing features of mainstream drawing programs don't even have any geometric shape recognition. So with infrequent exceptions, autotracing is overused pointless junk. It just trades one kind of raster-based ugliness (pixelation) for another kind of vector-based ugliness (shapeless jaggedness).
    I know...you didn't mention autotracing. But I mention it as an extreme case of a principle that you can apply to the features you did mention: Ask yourself what a purely mathematical algorithm with zero aesthetic discernment is going to yield in terms of what you would consider elegant execution.
    Again, I'll cite a well-known extreme: Anyone who has ever had to deal with auto-generated 2D DXF exports from CAD/CAE programs is familiar with the ubiquitous problem of dealing with thousands of tiny disjointed straight segments meant to represent a curve. Those tasked with handling such drudgery deal with it routinely. Some of them even devise additonal automated algorithms to make a bad situation marginally better. Yes, it "gets the job done." Yes, today's computer hardware can process the ridiculous amount of geometrically unnecessary data without choking. Yes, at the scale at which it will be printed in the parts catalog, the faceted shape will not be distractingly noticeable. But no self-respecting technical illustrator would ever actually draw the same subject that way from scratch, and his far more elegantly drawn-from-scratch result would be far more versatile and robust for multiple final uses.
    Your bush example is not so complex as to make drawing deliberately and directly with the Pen impractical. In fact, doing so is much less work than the second example using a bunch of ellipses and applying boolean operations.  But maybe you stylistically desire each edge of each blade to be a portion of a mathematical ellipse or even strictly circular. In that case, using automated boolean operations may be justified. But (especially in Illustrator) I would be sure to carefully examine the results. Illustrator's automated path generation routines (Pathfinders, Offset Path, Outline Stroke) have been notorious at various times (versions) for generating ugly and sometimes functionally problematic artifacts such as needless coincident anchors (for just one example).
    Your second example of the "scratchboard" style illustration is a case-in-point of situations where we make value judgements and (hopefully careful) compromise between semi-automation and path-drawing purism. You're trying to emulate an expressly non-geometric aesthetic style. The particular example is a good one, because it's a "borderline" example. That drawing is simple enough that it could be drawn entirely anchor-by-anchor, and I would likely do it that way if, for example, it was going to be cut from sign vinyl enlarged to the scale of a trade show background or a wall hanging in an airport.
    But if it were only to serve as a one-time placement as a spot graphic in a magazine, I might, for example, create an ArtBrush for certain portions of it, like the selected sun rays, and "let it go" for practical considerations. (Although I'd not deliver it as such; I'd consider it a matter of due dilligence to expand such semi-automated "live" onstructs and check the paths for reasonable cleanness.)
    Bear in mind, Bezier-based drawing has been the mainstream for three decades now. We're not "fooling anyone" anymore. There now exists a new aesthetic discernment. Even our audiences are well aware that digital emulations of the randomness of so-called "natural media" are just that; contrived digital emulations. Our audiences view our artwork with a certain skepticism.
    And when you put something in print, there's (hopefully, although I often wonder) still the matter of professional pride which bears in mind that our artwork will be viewed not by just the "unsuspecting public" but also by our peers; our colleagues. So you want to avoid any "dead giveaways" of execution by "cheap tricks" which "hurt the eyes" of other vector illustrators. At the scale viewed on this computer in this forum, there are details in that drawing which look like (whether they are or not) the kind of unintentional artifacts commonly generated by path operations and such. Such artifacts don't read as "natural randomness" of the emulated medium (again, we're no longer fooling anyone). They break the stylistic consistency of detail of the overall drawing and therefore look like unintentional but disregarded results of some automated feature.
    So anytime you employ an automated path-generating feature, consider it normal to perform some cleanup on the result. Again, an extreme-case common situation exemplifies the principle. I put 3D Effect to use, but I would never deliver the raw results of it as final deliverable vector artwork. Automated features can be used as a rough-out tool; a means to an end, not the final end itself.
    JET

  • Paint Bucket not filling entire selection (CS4/5)

    Hello, I'm a professional cartoonist and have worked in Photoshop since the earliest versions.  Since upgrading to CS4 (and now CS5), I've been having trouble using the Paint Bucket Tool, so I'd appreciate any help here.
    Here's a basic example ...
    1) Imagine a single layer CMYK document.
    2) Draw a closed shape using the Pencil Tool (no antialiasing!) with a color of choice.
    3) Select the inside of this shape using the Magic Wand Tool (again, no antialiasing!).
    4) Fill the selection with the EXACT SAME COLOR using Paint Bucket tool.
    5) Deselect region.
    6) Now use menu options SELECT -> COLOR RANGE ... And click on the filled region (technically, that color should be selected by default since it's your current foreground color).
    7) Click OK
    8) Choose a new foreground color and then Paint Bucket the selected region, BUT make sure you click on the area you filled in Step 4 ... i.e., do not click on a pixel you drew using the Pencil Tool.
    In CS4 and now CS5, the Paint Bucket is not including the pencilled outline when I click fill.  That is, I'm left with the original pencil outline, and the filled region in a new color.
    HOWEVER ... If in Step 8, I'm lucky enough to click one of the original pencil marks, the entire color region fills as it always did in previous versions.
    This has grown increasingly annoying while working with my cartoons because I use the Pencil Tool to "close" gaps in my inked lines, and then the Paint Bucket to fill.  If I decide to change the color of a character's shirt, I'm left with tiny spots in the gap regions.
    Help would be much appreciated!!
    Thanks

    Thanks for your suggestions, Charles.
    Here's a better explanation as to what is happening with visual examples ...
    I ink my cartoons with traditional tools, and then scan a high-res copy into Photoshop.  The black ink is converted to a 2 color bitmap so that there is no anti-aliasing.  This file is then converted to CMYK for coloring.  The black line art becomes the bottom ("Background") layer, and I add a new layer on top for the flat colors.  The flat colors layer is set to "Multiply" so that I can close tiny gaps in my lines with color, without erasing the original black lines.
    Visually ...
    1) Bottom layer is black outline with no antialiasing ...
    2) Create new layer on top for flat colors and set to MULTIPLY.  Using pencil tool (and Wacom Tablet), close the gap with red ...
    3) Because layer is on multiply, you can see that the red in Step 2 is actually this shape ...
    4) Magic Wand to select the area INSIDE of the now closed circle.  Wand is set to "Sample All Layers" so that it selects only the area closed in by the black outline layer AND the red.  Paint bucket this area with the exact same red ...
    5)  Once again, here is what the flat color layer actually looks like since Multiply is on ...
    6) Magic wand the area outside of the circle and fill with a DIFFERENT color ...
    7) Now, suppose you didn't want the circle to be red.  I now select the red using Magic Wand (or Select -> Color Range menu) and click on the red.  An outline appears around the ENTIRE red shape (i.e., you would assume that all of the red has been selected since it is the EXACT same color ... verified using eyedropper tool) ... However, if you click to fill with Paint Bucket, here is the result ...
    8) For some reason, Photoshop is "remembering" the red originally drawn using the Pencil Tool in Step 2 as a separate region ... Even though all of the colors are on the exact same layer ...
    I hope this better explains what I'm experiencing here
    ANY IDEAS???

  • Paint bucket displayed

    I've got a GUI vi that is display an odd phenomena that I haven't run into before. On a display tab that happens to have some picture controls that display different .PNG images based on runtime program settings. Over these picture controls are some user controls. The weird behavior I am seeing is that when the operator mouses over the user controls, if the cursor moves to an area that is over the picture control, but not over one of the user controls, the cursor changes from the "finger" or "text bar" to the little "paint bucket", like the one in the icon editor (but not the "ink bottle" from paint). It is annoying/distracting, and actually takes a finite moment to switch back to the appropriate "tool" image when it mouses over something that is actually editable. Any thoughts as to the cause or cure?
    Thanks,
    Putnam
    Certified LabVIEW Developer
    Senior Test Engineer
    Currently using LV 6.1-LabVIEW 2012, RT8.5
    LabVIEW Champion
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Well, here is a simple example with a .png picture. Mousing over the image portion gives me the paint bucket, and this is being run on different machine, leading me to believe it is inherent in LabVIEW, at least at this version.
    Putnam
    Certified LabVIEW Developer
    Senior Test Engineer
    Currently using LV 6.1-LabVIEW 2012, RT8.5
    LabVIEW Champion
    Attachments:
    Paint tool demo_LV2010.zip ‏153 KB

  • X on bottom of Live Paint Bucket tool

    Thanks guys for helping me find the Paint bucket tool.
    All I have is a simple cartoon face that I have drawn, scanned and brought over and using Live Paint.
    I can get the paint to fill the face area, but it won't let me do one of the ears. It gives me an X on the bottom of the paint bucket.
    What can I do to get that X to go away and let me fill that ear with a colour?
    Thanks
    Bob

    Select the repsective object, convert it to a Live Paint group first from the Object menu. If that option is not available, you may need to expand the object first and release any clipping masks or nested compound paths.
    Mylenium

  • Big problem, Live Paint Bucket changing strokes

    Hi all, so in the first picture you can see the finished line work. When I fill the face with a color in Live Paint, it changes the strokes and makes them appear jagged in varying widths, it's especially obvious on the eyes, ears, and hair - it looks like it is applying Pathfinder>Divide. I have the stroke set to nothing when I apply the fill, please help!

    how about this?
    1. duplicate the lineart and put it underneath the layer and lock the original
    2. convert the lineart into an outline stroke by going to Effect>Outline Stroke then Object>Expand Appearance
    3. Open Pathfinder Pallete and then select all and Unite/Add it.
    4. change everything to no stroke and no fill
    5. select all then convert it to live paint
    6. deselect the converted path and start using live paint bucket.
    7. after that expand it and ungroup so you can move the fill path. also you'll notice that it will remove all path you have been converted.
    reply if it works,

Maybe you are looking for