Panasonic 100a Advanced/Anamorphic Render?

Hello,
One of our shooters has a Panasonic 100a and I decided to find out how 24 fps looked... So we shot 24 frames advanced, anamorphic. In FC, I set my sequence for 23.98 advanced pull down and check the anamorphic box. The resulting captured sequence looks and plays fine and the settings from the sequence match that of the captured clip. However, each clip needs rendered? And the render is almost 1:1 or 1-minute of video = 1 minute of render (D2.7). So I am thinking I did something wrong. So my question is what did I do wrong?
Mike

Yes... I did that each time I've tried a new attempt. My latest frustration is now I can't get back to true widescreen even needing a render.
Here was my latest workflow:
Open FC > close any project > choose easy set up > 24 frame advanced. Don't change anything else. Resulting clip does not need rendered. Playback on computer monitor shows correct widescreen. Playback via DSR 11 shows incorrect (squished) widescreen, though not as squished as the actual tape footage appears.
Next: close project > confirm easy set up > from within audio video settings > sequence presets, edit = 720x480 DV 3:2 anamorphic is checked. From capture presets, edit = 720x480 DV 3:2, Anamorphic is checked. Resulting clip plays the same (nothing really changed, I just went into Audio/Video settings> edit to confirm the settings.
Again, (close project etc....) this time I change both sequence & capture to NTSC 4:3 (from DV 3:2). Clip behaves the same (not true widescreen on the external monitor) but now it needs rendered!
Next- keep the sequence preset NON-anomorphic but the capture preset Anamorphic. Now I get the proper display on the external monitor, and a green line for realtime playback but final sequence needs rendered. Closest so far.
This whole process has brought up two other things to test: if I capture anamorphic sequence & capture preset which means my clip isn't displaying properly on the external monitor (via a DSR 11 BTW) BUT I tell DVDSP to burn anamorphic, does DVDSP "correct" my display issue?
Last question- somewhere during all of this, my blank viewer & canvas screens have turned green. Before they were simply black when blank/empty. Not sure it matters?
Mike

Similar Messages

  • Anamorphic render problem

    Not sure what's causing this... I've got a 16x9 clip that I've enlarged slightly and cropped by 15 top & bottom to match the other footage. Problem is, when it fades up from black there's a line or two in the border during the fade that shows the original and then a single black line. In other words, during the fade only, top and bottom have fifteen horizontal lines of black, one or two lines of the footage and then one line of black again. After the fade, everything's fine.
    Any ideas as to what's causing this? I've tried using a slug under it, and that seems to help a little but I can still see it and it's driving me nuts. I've also tried feathering the crop-- that gets rid of it, but even with a .5 feather, it's too soft.
    The footage was downconverted from HDV, sequence setting is for NTSC DV 3:2, sequence preset is NTSC 48khz anamorphic.
    Your help is much appreciated,
    Lucy

    A couple of possible workarounds.
    Nest the clip after you've applied the crop but before you apply the fade in. Apply the fade to the nest.
    Export the clip with sequence settings after you've applied the crop and then import back in and do the fade in.

  • Pal Anamorphic LP needs rendering

    Hi -
    I am not sure why I am having this problem. Using FCP 4.5 (HD), I have a video shot on a Panasonic 100A, and I am using that camera to import from. My project is set up as PAL - sequence preset, capture preset and device control preset.
    Yet everytime I drag down a clip, it says that it needs to be rendered.
    The only thing I can think of is that the footage was shot in Long Play (by mistake, I promise!) - could this be the cause of my problems? Or is there something even more stupid that I am missing?

    Could be a couple of things.
    first double check and see if you clip settings match you footage settings.
    right-click on a clip and click the format tab.
    Then go up and make sure they are the same as your settings.
    See if what needs to be rendered is the video or the audio. there are two bars on the render bar. video upper, audio lower.
    People sometimes overlook how they recorded audio as well as video.

  • Settings, preferences for the Sequence

    i'm capturing footage i shot with the panasonic 100a,
    and before i bring footage into a project to edit
    i need to make sure my original presets are what i need from here on out....
    i just want the most 'pure' treatment of my footage once it's in the sequence,
    not going through thing it doesn't need. in the end, my final film must be just like it is when i put in the computer.
    i'm not familiar with settings like:
    * field of dominance, such as lower(even)
    * pixel aspect ratio
    * video processing, like YUV allowed (8-bit)
    * white point
    * compressor (i don't see why i'd won't compress my footage, if it's not to be
    made into a steaming video clip or the alike)
    * data rate limit
    on my panasonic the setting i shot with, instead of '24 p' was 'scene advanced'.
    thanks alot for any advice.
    wkm

    Select the Easy Setup that matches the source materials' properties. i.e. if it's anamorphic choose that etc... You can probably capture it at 29.97 even if you've shot 24fps. It will look exactly the same either way. The only reason to capture it and remove pulldown is if you're going to print back to film. You neededn't worry about any of the custom settings at all... just use the easy setup that matches what you shot.
    Jerry

  • Prosumer camera advice?

    Hi everyone,
    I've been posting in the Final Cut Express forum about this, and someone pointed out that this forum was really better suited to my question, so I'm going to ask here too (the thread in the FCE forum is here, just for the record - http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6996202).
    I'm looking for a prosumer video camera, in the range of $1-3,000, to be used for event videography and fictional/documentary shorts. I know I want to stick with tape-based (miniDV), and it obviously has to be compatible with Final Cut. I want to start using more manual controls, and probably go to HDV, although for now at least I would still shoot in DV (or in HDV and downconvert; several people have been promoting that). Also, I'm a high school girl, and not to stereotype, but I'm probably not as physically strong as a lot of camera-people out there; so having something fairly light is also really important to me (definitely NOT shoulder-mounted, though it seems there isn't much of that in this price range anyway). I'm also looking to get a good tripod, so suggestions on that front would be appreciated too.
    It seems that the more research I do, the more overwhelmed I get with all the options! I've never had the choice of what camera to use before - just used the family's TRV330, and when it died, the new TRV38 - so trying to navigate all these features and options, and end up with the ideal camera for me, is quite daunting. I also have a paid project coming up in a few weeks and would really like to use the new camera for it, which means I have to buy something pretty soon so I can have time to play around with it before the event.
    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Claire

    My advice hasn't changed. The Sony DSR-PD170. $2600 at B&H
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/296545-REG/SonyDSRPD170_DSR_PD170_3_CCD_MiniDVCAM.html
    If you are going to be recording in any dimly lit room (or even dark room such as most wedding receptions), NOTHING compares to the 170. There is no other way to put it. The Panasonic 100 is a great camera, we have one. However, to make this (or any camera really) shine, you must have control over your lighting. Shooting events means you have little to no control over your lighting. If I put a Panasonic 100B next to a Sony PD-170 at a typical wedding reception, the 100B will have a very graining, very dark image lacking most color saturation. The 170 will be, IMHO, at least two-stops brighter, and though grainy, it will be less grainy and have some sort of color detail. To recommend any other camera to be used for event work (unless working your way up the Sony line) simply comes from users that haven't used all the models. We have used:
    Sony: 1000, 2000, 2100, 150, 170, and the DSR 250
    Canon: Gl1, Gl2, XL1, XL1s, XL2
    Panasonic: 100a, 100b
    Each camera has their own merits. Each is capable of recording a great image. Under controlled circumstances, any of these cameras are excellent. Event shooting is mostly uncontrolled, unscripted.
    The only other camera I would consider is out of your price range: the Panasonic HVX200. I believe Panasonic is shipping a more sensitive version of this camera very soon and new models are salted for release this fall. I say this camera because it will record in the DVCPro HD format. Which in my opinion, is MUCH better than HDV. It allows allows DVCPro 50, which is better SD quality than DV. But again, when you add the cost of P2 media and the cost of the camera, you are well out of budget.
    In terms of tripods, the least expensive I would consider is this: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/481931-REG/BogenManfrotto__190XDB501H_Video_TripodSystem.html
    And, while I don't have a 503 head, I have read that it is much better than the 501 on the model listed above. I do have 501 heads and they are OK, at best. If you really want to know the difference, go rent a $2,000 tripod and head. Might cost you $50 to rent but you will really be able to tell what the difference is. I have found the 501 head to be the least expensive head that I can live with. However, for most work that is scheduled in advance, I prefer to rent.
    Having said all that, as Bilbo Baggins might say: it's time to stop thinking and wasting the day.
    Your equipment is your tools. The tools you use to create something; to turn your visions into something concrete. Sure, you want the best tools you can afford. But learning to use the tool is for more important than the tool itself. In the end, it's just a tool. You are the part that makes the difference. Just get started.
    Mike

  • After Effects CS5.5 Error Rendering known clean project even after Reinstall and after System Restore

    I've been getting frequent, but not consistent, errors during rendering AE CS5.5 projects with lots of 3D layers and lights. I have gone back to a known clean project to confirm the issue isn't with a particular project. The error is usually an error invoking the advanced 3D render engine. This is sometimes followed by a bad tracked memory id popup. But sometimes the program just hangs up.
    My System:
    i7 [email protected]
    24GB RAM
    Windows 7 professional 64 bit SP1
    NVidia Geforce GTX 570
    I have trashed the preferences, cleaned the cache, turned off rendering multiple frames, deleted Open GL, updated the graphics card drivers and even tried reverting to old graphics card drivers. Window's Memory Diagnostic Tool didn't find any problems. System File Checker Tool didn't find any corrupt files. My system drive is not fragmented.  I have reinstalled AE, reinstalled all of CS5.5, and did a system restore to a known working point (both with and without doing the Windows updates that have occurred since the restore point). None of this fixed the problem.
    I have tried the script BG Renderer to render in the background. I have consistently gotten the following error running the script, which I'm hoping will be a clue:
    "aerender ERROR An existing connection was forcible closed by the remote host.
    :Unable to receive at line 314
    aerender ERROR: After Effects can not render for aerender. Another instance of aerender, or another script, may be running; or, AE may be waiting for a response from a modal dialog, or for a render to complete. Try running aerender without the - reuse flag to invoke a separate instance of After Effects."
    The first two times I tried to render with BG Renderer, the error came right after closing AE. But I still got the same error if I left AE open and just sat and watched.
    Any help is appreciated.

    Update: I believe I have discovered the problem! It was a bad RAM stick. Windows Memory Diagnostic tool found nothing wrong, and nothing in my system seemed to be effected other than the ability to render complex AE projects with 3D layers. After a complete system restore to a known working point failed to help, I opened up the machine. Finding nothing loose, I methodically tested all the memory sticks to find the culprit. Everything is running smoothly now, albeit on less RAM.

  • Need latest protocol for preparing movie for web in X

    Hello. The basic problem is slow start on You Tube. My general question concerns preparing a movie for the web; not restricted to You Tube.
    In FCP 7,  it was export using QT conversion, to Quick Time Movie using broadband Med or most recent settings, choose H264, choose custom size 16:9 HD 1280 x 720p, prepare head for internet streaming by choosing quick start ,
    adjust settings, and save. Then, Open .mov (usually 1 G for 3 minutes) in QT, choose export to web, transcode, and send 50-100 Mb  M4V or sometimes MP4 to Host. No problem.
    When I open an .mov prepared in X, the QT Player no longer allows the same options as it did when processing 7 movies.  Am I missing something? I click export to web with the new system and it just starts in coding.
    I appreciate the automatic features of X, but am having problems with both stutter start and a few more upload problems that I see as temporary.
    Thx.  www.youtube.com/user/edwardshaw1
    Any suggestions most grateful for.
    Ed

    Check your Applications > Utilities folder. That's where the OSX Installer moved Quicktime 7 (also known as Quicktime Player) when Quicktime X became the standard player. Your pro license should still be activated. If you don't find it there and you have a Snow Leopard (or earlier) installer disk, you can find QT7 in the Extras folder. Make sure you do NOT overwrite Quicktime X when you move or install QT7 (both are originally named "Quicktime Player" - but you can rename the older Quicktime Player to "Quicktime Player 7" before moving it into your Applications folder.)
    The problem with MPEG Streamclip and other "third party" conversion software (like ClipWrap and Smart Converter) is they use FFMPEG open source x.264 codecs. Apple's H.264 codec is superior (arguably, marginally better... but better.)
    YouTube will "respect" your upload if it's already done well (to their specifications.) Otherwise, their software will recompress it.
    In QT7Pro, you settings should be:
    Compression type: H.264
    Frame Rate 30 (or 29.97) fps  (29.97 is the "true" 30...) [Even if your project is 720/60p - YT wants 30]
    Keyframes: Automatic
    Frame Reordering : OFF!
    Data Rate: (I'll get back to this)
    Optimized for: Streaming (only allowed with Best Quality encoding setting)
    Quality: (if you specify a data rate, you only can use "High" -- and you *should* specify a data rate)
    Encoding: Best Quality (Multi-pass)
    Audio:
    Format: AAC
    Channels: Stereo (don't think it matters)
    Rate: 44.1KHz
    [show advanced settings]
    Render settings (doesn't matter - normal is fine)
    MPEG-4 AAC Encoder Settings:
    I use Variable bit rate ; Sound Quality at 128 - 160kbps (about 2/3's to Best on the slider)
    (you can use a constant bit rate - i think YT allows up to about 192kbps, but I don't "push it")
    If you fall within these parameters, YT is not likely to futz with your vid, you'll get what you put up.
    Now, for the Data Rates:
    For 1080/30p (29.97p) I've found that 4Mbits/sec is adequate for most video (most of mine are tutorials). If you have sections of your video that have something like trees blowing in the wind shot against a bright blue sky -- you will definitely need a much higher data rate (check your transitions too, they can be subject to some nasty blocking/artifacting when highly compressed). To figure out how much, take a 5 second clip* of the highest action and transcode it at - start at 12.5Mbits/sec (or 12,500 kbits/sec) - and see if you notice any "blocking" - if you do, crank up the data rate another 500-1000kbits/sec (or more if it's pretty bad). If you don't — try optimizing your compression by reducing the data rate until blocking appears. You shouldn't need to exceed 18Mbits/sec... Upload your 5 sec clip to youtube and see if it works out okay. If so, just delete it. Transcode your video to those specs and upload to youtube. Remember your settings - they'll serve you well.
    For 720 video, 3200kbits/sec is a good starting point.  480 - 1500 kbits/sec. and so on...
    Bandwidth (aka data rate) is **key** to good video. The more compressed your video is, the more YT likes it. The more YT likes your video, the more likely they'll leave it alone and just pass it straight through. (I have seen them pass through data rates up to 18Mbits/sec. Just follow their rules.)
    [*In Quicktime 7 Pro, you can set an in and out point anywhere in your video by typing 'i' for the in point and 'o' for the out. Copy (Command-C) the selection. Command N to create a new player and paste - and you have your 5 (or whatever) second clip.]

  • Time code changes when reconnecting  media

    I have been working on a project for over year. Recently my computer was stolen when shooting abroad and now I had to buy a new one (leopard op sys) and reinstall my software to continue working. As I recapture the lost media a warning window pops out: "you are about to capture non drop frame media to a drop frame clip......". My media was shot with a panasonic 100a (24p), and since I started the project I have been capturing with the DV NTSC setting (it captures 29.97 drop frame). When I recapture, the clips in the browser appear as reconnected but the TIME CODE changes, and clips on the timeline referencing that media still appear offline (others don't even if the referenced clip is the same). If I try to reconnect from the timeline it tells me that media start and end do not match. I will appreciate any suggestions.

    Are you using a different camera/deck to capture this time than you used the last time?

  • Unsupported Image Format for DNG from GF1?

    I am in the process of trying to switch from Lightroom 3 to Aperture 3 (in case you are wondering why the main reason is increasing integration between iOS and Aperture).
    Most of the images in my Lightroom catalog are from Nikon DSLRs which when I import as DNGs from Lightroom into Aperture show up just fine. However, all of the old DNGs I try to import from Lightroom as DNGs that were shot with my Panasonic GF1 don't render in Aperture and just show up as "Unsupported Image Format."
    Please note that new GF1 images I import from the SD card of my GF1 import just fine. The problem seems limited to GF1 images saved in Lightroom as DNGs that I am importing into Aperture.
    Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to correct this issue?
    Thank you.

    Solved it. Had nothing to do with Photoshop PS4 install, it had to do with moving my home space to a larger external drive. One of the "import" setting changed (I don't remember changing it) such that the images weren't getting imported into Aperture. (Re-?)checked that, and all is well. Will go for the PS4-reinstall tomorrow.

  • FCP captures at 29.97 instead of 23.98

    I just started shooting with the HVX 200 to tape last week, and I have a doozy of a problem on my hands. I shot a snowboarding competition in scene file F6 (filmcam). Recording setup is 480i/24P.
    So I have 24p footage right? Well, for whatever reason, my Final Cut Pro 6.0.2 will not capture at that framerate. When the clip is done capturing, and I click on "Item Properties" it says that the "vid rate" is 29.97. And obviously I went into capture setup options and switched them to "DV-NTSC 24p (23.98)"
    I do not have this same problem with the flash card stuff, nor do I have this problem with older 24p stuff I shot with my older camera. Other clips that I have captured at 23.98 read as such according to "item properties."
    I am using Final Cut Pro 6.0.2
    Any ideas?

    I can't give you teh exact steps to follow, but might be able able to help you understand what's going on. If you used the HVX 200, you are probably using Log&Transfer, unless you recorded to DV tape, in which case you will ineed be capturing.
    Unless you use 24pN (native), your 23.98 video will actually be recorded at 29.97 with Panasonic's advanced pulldown. This pulldown is generally removed at capture or afterwards in FCP. Removing the pulldown allows the clips to play back as if they were 24p by removing the pulldown on the fly, However, the original 29.97 interlaced video is preserved in the source media. You will notice under these circumstances that the timcode on the 24p clips actually counts up to 29 frames and skips a frame every 3-4 frames.
    By setting Log & Transfer or Capture to remove advacned pulldown, you should be able to work in 24p, but the clips will still have timecode that counts up to 29 frames each second, and may persist in beign identified as 29.97 depending on where you look. 24pN will actually record native 24p with no pulldown and 24 fps timecode, however this format is only possible when shooting HD - recording DV ntsc to tape with this camera will always create 29.97 video even iif it's using the advanced pulldown.
    Hope this helps -
    Max Average

  • Capturing - Best option for me

    I was just wondering if someone could give me advice on what would be the optimum selection available for capturing Panasonic DVM Advanced Master Tapes for HDV/DV (although I shot it using 24p, not HD unfortunately). What is the difference between the regular NTSC DV option and the advanced with the 2:3 pulldown? Will the advanced have any side effects later on? Is it better if this particular project has a chance of going to film when all is said and done? If someone has these answers and more, or if they know where to lead me to get them, I'd greatly appreciate it.

    In a nutshell
    no hdv with panasonic. HD on P2cards or tape with hdx and varicam models
    shooting dv @24P produces 29.97 fps NTSC with a 2:3 pulldown
    shooting @24PA produces 29.97 fps NTSC with a 2:3:3:2 pulldown which can be formatted to remove pulldown producing a 23.98 timeline ostensibly for future filmout. If you master this to tape or DVD it'll go to 29.97 fps NTSC with 2:3 pulldown. there are ton's of references to this all over the internet and this forum
    Google 24PA

  • Color correction dilemma-puzzled

    Hi
    I have FCP3 on a G4 733 Apple. I shot some footage with a Panasonic 100A. I neglected to keep the white balance Auto function off or set it to preset mode. The colors shifted back in forth from warm to cooler. I attempted to correct this with the 3 way and 2 way color corrector filters. I tried the tint filter. It seems to get closer to matching the colors than the color corrector. My problem is the colors on the tape cross-faded into each other. It wasn't a straight cut. I wanted to use the pointer and take a sample from the clip that had the colors I wanted to use and copy it to a key frame or another clip so that I may maintain color continuity. If you have a solution it will be appreciated. Thanks.
    Kim

    did you get this figured out? this a huge problem, correcting for gradual color temp changes but it can be fixed. the ATW on the panasonic is great and i confess, i use it a lot but i also have the ATW Lock feature mapped to the user 2 button so once the auto white gets to where i want it, i can lock it. it's no substitute for manual white/black balancing, however.
    there two ways to approach this and various methods for both ways. which ever way you choose, i believe it's best to isolate the color temp changes by placing edits points before the color changes and after it finishes.
    one way is to match the shot you think looks best and the three way color corrector is the only tool you need for this job. find the scene you like best, apply the three way to everything else. use the match hue function to bring those other shots to match your main shot. you may want to futz a bit with some of the other levels as the match hue, while doing a decent job, isn't perfect. copy the three way filter from one of your blue shots to the clips you made that isolated the color temp change. apply it. you'll need to keyframe the levels to match the color change accordingly. painstaking but doable.
    the other method is to take all the clips to fcp's version of white and i think i would do this. make a sequence of only your clips you want to color correct. isolate the color temp change again. apply the three way to everything. use the auto white function to change everything, except for the clips containing the color temp change. on those clips you will layer a copy of the three way filter from the previous clip and a copy from the following clip. if you keyframe each filter appropriately, you won't see a color change. once you have this sequence tweaked to the where everything looks consistent which is the goal of this method, export a new self-contained quicktime clip and use that instead of your original clips. apply color enhancement as wanted. very painstaking but also doable. you won't have the original timecode to use but if the edit isn't completed, not a big deal.
    it's all painstaking. the least amount of work is the captain's original mention of making it all black and white! one good thing though, you'll remember this and it won't happen again.

  • Timecode help, camera to camera

    have a timecode break that i can't seem to solve. user pref. indeed set to Make New Clip.
    for a day or so, i have in my possession 2 panasonic 100a's, and i saw one solution on this forum
    about creating a new tape camera to camera.
    can someone please tell me the hookup - what wires and where, and lead this simple-minded guy to peace of mind.
    as always, much gratitude to one and all

    I have worked out a solution for timecode breaks which is easy and relatively uncomplicated.
    Background:
    I recently borrowed by Father's Canon ZR700 mini-DV video camera. I have an older ZR200. Both are decent cameras, especially for the price. However, when I tried to import video from the ZR700 camera using FCE 3.5.1, I experienced breaks in the time-code which produced an unworkably slow process as FCE looked for timecode breaks.
    Solution:
    After some thought, I decided to use iMovie 06 to experiment with off-loading the video to DV and then "sharing" it back to "video camera" via mini-DV tape.
    By using this transfer technique and employing the ZR200 camera as the "sharing" camera - which takes a little extra time and loses the original time code information - I was able to produce a tape which created a smooth and continuous import into FCE without timecode breaks.
    I went on to experiment with this same process using the original ZR700 as the "sharing" camera, that is to say, I shared the DV back to the same tape from which the original video was extracted, and it worked fine.
    Although I can't exactly explain why this works, I suspect that the timecode is placed in the video using a different route than the record head and FCE can see it.
    Why the Canon ZR700 model exhibits such random and poor quality timecode quality is unclear. It may be this particular unit or for some other reason associated with the design or production quality. However, the older ZR200 camera is great and gives solid timecodes on all my videos.
    Last note: I also used a record speed of LP versus SP when I "shared" in iMovie 06, even though the original video came from an SP tape. I can't see any difference except that the tape lasts longer.
    WARNING: This technique loses - or appears to lose - the original recording information which is imprinted on the tape, including the date and time when the video was recorded. In order to re-create that information, I place a note into the video in iMovie 06 which states when (date and time) the video was taken. Some people care about this information, others don't.
    Well, that's my solution to dropped or irregular timecodes. I would be interested to know if this technique works with other cameras.

  • Odd motion blur in Log and Capture

    not on the video camera's LCD, but on the Log and Capture window
    i'm suddenly having this motion blur, just when subject even slightly moves...
    there is like blur of small lines, but agian, Not on the original footage playing off camera.
    my camera is panasonic 100a.

    log and capture gives a low res proxy and is not an accurate reflection of captured content.
    Hook up an external monitor (even if it's a cheapo portable tv) to see what you're gonna get whilst editing.

  • Just a slow OpenGL card? Cpu is faster or zero difference?

    Just installed After Effects CS3 as part of Production Premium. Did all the updates, which finally let me enable OpenGL, but I practically don't see a difference with previews.
    It's a cheap ATI X1600pro (256megs, I think, and AE set to 200megs), supports all features in OpenGL info. Vista 32bit, 2gigs of ram, running dual 20inch widescreens. Core 2 duo E6400, not enough memory for multiprocessing.
    For some reason, testing an older project file, consisting of blurs, zooms, panning, fading in and out, comp at 640*480, I don't see one bit of improvement with OpenGL on. I mean, how can that be?
    To get some exact times, I used make movie on the first 30 seconds of the timeline, 23fps, quicktime medium quality. I'd use OpenGL renderer and repeat without opengl. I did two times each. OpenGL came out to 00:05:10, 2nd time 00:05:08. Using CPU, for some reason one came out quicker, 00:04:41, and the 2nd time 00:05:09
    Is my video card just slow enough to only be comparable to a single core on a core 2 duo? Or did I miss a setting and it's not using OpenGL at all, explaining the zero difference?

    Suggest reading up in the online help on OpenGL. I believe it will list which effects can be used.
    Std 3D has been removed. Now you just get the Advanced 3D render. Not sure why your stuff is mistimed now. That shouldn't happen when you open older projects. Did you open it, or import it? Could be your frame rates between your projects are different.. All the footage interpolation set correctly (d1 vs square, etc). Comp settings the same (PAR same?)

Maybe you are looking for