Parallelized transfer

Hi
Can any one explain what is parallelized transfer in the screen CFM2 transaction(activation or deactivation integration model). What is the use of this and how we can use for better performance.
What must be the values for
1.Absolute Max no of process
2. Relativemax no of process
Please share if any one has used this option.
Thanks and regards
VIjaya

Hi Vijaya,
When we carry out integration model run, we used to carry out transfer of objects sequentially.
This option is useful to carry out paralleized transfer of more than one or more objects at a time.
If you set this indicator, the ERP system selects objects that are to be transferred to SAP APO in parallel in different work processes. The parallelization takes place with reference to the blocks of a filter object type. Each work process processes a filter object block.
You specify the block size (that is, the maximum number of filer objects to be processed per block) using transaction CFC3 as before.
Parallelized selection can lead to a significant increase in performance.
If this indicator is not set, the ERP system selects the objects in serial.
The performance of the initial data transfer is not only determined by parallelization, but also by the size of the filter object blocks. If you specify a large block size in transaction CFC3, only a few blocks may be formed within the filter object type. This means that only a few work processes can be parallelized.
However, for smaller block sizes it is possible to have a higher degree of parallelization although only a small number of objects are transferred to SAP APO per block
If you would like to optimize the performance of the initial data transfer, you also have to take into account the size of the filter blocks in addition to parallelization and adjust your system depending on the data being transferred.
In general, in most of the projects, they prefer sequential transfer rather than parallel transfer in which there will be some uniformity in transfer process and any errors caused during transfer can be identified and actions can be taken online for those objects. If you transfer all in one shot, error analysis will be very challenging one.
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Similar Messages

Increase of work processes for data transfer for specific tables

Hi,
We are using TDMS for transfer of around 1 month's data from our ECC Quality system to ECC test system. The test system was built using shell creation and the transfer started.
We have allocated 13 batch processes in the central system and reciever system. There are currently two tables for which transfer is running. The transfer is completed for all other tables. But eventhough there are 13 processes available, there are only 3 processes allocated to one table and 2 processes allocated to another table for transfer.
Since the time is dependent on the complete transfer of these two tables and since there are 8 free processes available, we would like to assign the remaining processes on these tables so that the transfer is faster.
Please guide me if there is any way to change the same.
Regards,
Ragav

Hi,
Thanks to Sandeep and Pankaj for the replies.
I've started data transfer in CRM landscape and in that i was able to define the read method, write method and change some technical settings for transfer.
In the Technical settings for transfer option, i was able to increase the parallel transfer batch processes to be run in parallel.
Regards,
Ragav

Napster2Go - PC-to-ZenMicro Transfer Spe

I've seen it mentioned in a few other threads, but kind of just as a secondary issue that nobody has addressed, and I think it's probably deserving of its own thread. Transferring between the PC and my Micro - using the Napster software (at least) - seems to be pretty slow.
The USB 2.0 standard supposedly can handle 480 mbps (60 MB/s), but most test results (as seen on TomsHardware.com) seem to show typical external hard dri've speeds of ~8 MB/s. Now this is also just a raw stream of data, not stopping and starting like we are (between songs). So we probably shouldn't expect to see more than oh, say 0 MB/s (to be on the conservati've side).
But still, 0 MB/s would be something like 3 music files transferred in a given second - something that my transfer is definitely not doing. I have not timed it (yet), but it seems like 0 or so songs takes 30-45 seconds (maybe a speed around -.2 MB/s). This clearly is not utilizing the capabilities of the USB 2.0 connection.
Do many others see this going on? Is it only Napster's software, or is it also WMP0?
My own theory is if you look at how the Napster application is writing the files to the hard dri've. If you tell it to transfer 50 songs, it seems to pick a group of 8 (?) or so songs to write *all* at once. It then transfers this group of songs before proceeding onto the next group. This parallel transfer idea might have seemed like a great idea on the drawing board for a bunch of device-communication guys (potentially utilizing the available bandwidth in the USB 2.0 connection), but in all actuality writing to the hard dri've in this method is quite bad. The reason being that the hard dri've head has to jump around between 8 different spots on the hard dri've at once during the whole write operation, which ends up being much more of a speed bottleneck than just laying the files down one after the other. In addition, this could potentially severely limit the life of the hard dri've.
And, with some of us having to format our Micro's every three days and lay down the exact same songs again ... at this rate we could be looking at dead hard dri'ves long before a firmware update even comes along.
Any thoughts?

Hello Florian,
Try ???ViewFactory.createStyles() method - this method will be called on
creating NEW instance of notation model (will not be called on openning the
diagram) byt AFAIU this is exactly what you need.
Alex Shatalin

DataGuard question - overcoming network latency problem

Hi
Dataguard for 10.2.0.4
Assuming we have a latency problem with the network between the primary and secondary databases in a dataguard configuration.
That means that my bottleneck is currently the network that cannot accommodate the amount of redo that is generated per second by the primary, and archive logs are accumulating on the primary site
Is there a way to configure the redo transport on the primary to transfer the archive logs in parallel – in case there is an accumulation of archive logs waiting to be shipped
I am talking parallel transfer to the same site , not to different sites – just to overcome the network bottleneck
Thanks in advance
Orna

Hi Sybrand,
Quoting from the doc
'Oracle Database 10g Release 2 introduces the ability to have multiple ARCn processes sending redo for a single archived-redo log over the network, reducing the time required to ship a single archive log to a remote destination. In previous Oracle Database releases, only one ARCn process at a time could archive redo from a given log file. The maximum number of network connections that will be used in parallel to perform archival to a destination is controlled using the MAX_CONNECTIONS attribute of the LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_n initialization parameter. The LOG_ARCHIVE_MAX_PROCESSES initialization parameter can be set as high as 30, (the previous maximum was 10)'
My 'back of a cigarette packet' calculation was not meant to be exact just meant to illustrate a point :-)
I still think your confusing bandwidth with latency but I don't want to poke an angry response :-)
Cheers,
Harry
Edited by: Harry on Jul 10, 2009 3:33 PM - seems the language filter doesn;t like my British slang. Changed to cigarette......

Data Warehouse RAID Configuration

Hi,
We are moving from oracle 9i to 10g two of our databases.
The first one is our Staging database.
The second is the datawarehouse database.
Most of the activity in the Staging database is writing data.
Most of the activity in the datawarehouse database is reading data
( the only data that is writen is by transportable tablespace from the Staging
database to the datawarehouse database)
The size of each one is about 1 Tera.
Our backup and recovery strategy based on Cold backup in every weekend.
1. Could one please suggest on RAID level for each one of those databases ?
2. Could one suggest about using ASM on datawarehouse ?
Regards

RAID-Definitions
http://linux.cudeso.be/raid.php
RAID 0 : Striped Disk Array without Fault Tolerance
RAID 1 : Mirroring and Duplexing
RAID 2 : Hamming Code ECC
RAID 3 : Parallel transfer with parity
RAID 4 : Independent Data disks with shared Parity disk
RAID 5 : Independent Data disks with distributed parity blocks
RAID 6 : Independent Data disks with two independent distributed parity schemes
RAID 7 : Optimized Asynchrony for High I/O Rates as well as High Data Transfer Rates
RAID 10 : Very High Reliability combined with High Performance
RAID 53 : High I/O Rates and Data Transfer Performance
RAID 0+1 : High Data Transfer Performance
RAID0, RAID5, RAID10 and RAID0+1 are mostly common RAID being used.
RAID5 known to have slower Write data transaction rate
Our backup and recovery strategy based on Cold backup in every weekendYou understand this backup srategy means you potentially can lost up to 7 days of data, right?

Create business partner

Hello Experts,
In my ECC 6.0 system, transaction code CFM2 "Activate or Deactivate Integration Model";
The option of Create Business partner isn't there. How to activate Create Business partner in t.code CFM2?
Regards,
Aravind

Hi Chirag/ Senthil,
Thanks for the reply.
In CFM2 screen, of Activate or Deactivate Integration MOdel.
The following are the options:
Selection Criteria
Special CIF settings
Parallelized Transfer
PP/DS and SNP Planner order
Transfer Business Partner
In the current client there is no option of "Transfer Business Partners". How to get this option back?
I hope the query is clear now.
Regards,
Aravind

Substitution to Variance settlement documnent

Hi All,
I have a situation in which I have to assess variance setlement amount in GL to COPA which is only possible if I have Cost center populated on the Variance Setllement accounting document. Is there any way I can define substitution for populating the Cost Center field on the accounting document for a particular GL account creating at the time of Variance setlement? I would appreciate a step by step explanation.
Thanks
MKR

Hi,
SAP best practice is settle production variance to COPA.Why do you wants to post variances to cost center?
you can set defualt cost element and cost center combination in OKB9.before this check this documentation.this might helps you.
Transferring Production Variances
Use
To run closed profitability analysis for periods, you need to transfer to CO-PA at the end of the period all the variances that have occurred in that period. Variances typically occur if you valuate your materials with standard prices. At the end of the period, these standard costs are then compared with the actual costs incurred, and this comparison forms the basis for a detailed variance analysis. The variances are finally transferred to CO-PA at the end of the period to produce a factually correct representation of the results.
The variances for cost objects are transferred to CO-PA when production orders, for example, are settled. For a description of how variances arise and what causes them, see the documentation on Cost Object Controlling.
The functions described below are relevant mainly for manufacturing enterprises.
Features
Three ways for transferring production variances are set out below. How you use them depends on your information requirements in CO-PA.
u2022     You might wish, for example, to display the individual variance categories for Cost Object Controlling (CO-PC-OBJ) in CO-PA. In that case, you would settle the variance categories to CO-PA.
u2022     You only need to display the production variances as a total in CO-PA, which is how they are posted to FI. You might not need to calculate cost object variances and only wish to assign the relevant FI posting to CO-PA. In that case, you would post the production variances in FI to CO-PA.
u2022     You implement the Material Ledger (CO-PC-ACT). For the closing operations in Material Ledger, you might not wish to replace just the posted standard prices with the actual costs incurred. At the same time, you might want to subsequently allocate (across multiple levels) production variances to finished products at the end of the period and then display the revised variances in CO-PA. In that case, you would allocate the production variances subsequently using the Material Ledger.
Settling Variance Categories to Profitability Analysis
For the settlement of production orders, you can transfer to CO-PA the variance categories calculated in Cost Object Controlling. The requirements for this are as follows:
u2022     You are working with standard prices for processed materials.
u2022     You have already performed variance calculation in Cost Object Controlling.
u2022     You have entered in the settlement profile for your production order that you wish to settle variances.
u2022     You have set up and assigned a PA transfer structure in Customizing for CO-PA to be used to direct the calculated variance categories into the desired value fields.
The variance categories are settled in a much the same way as that for Settling Orders and Projects. For more information on these requirements, choose Flows of Actual Values  Settling Production Variances in CO-PA Customizing.
When your cost object is settled, the information will be transferred to costing-based CO-PA if these requirements have been fulfilled. In this way, the production variances are shown at the level of the particular product currently being produced. It is only possible to allocate production variances subsequently as a total when the Material Ledger is involved (see below).
The variance categories can only be displayed in value fields. This function is therefore not available in account-based Profitability Analysis.
Assigning Production Variances from FI to CO-PA
If you only need to display production variances as a total as described above, you can alternatively assign the production variances from FI to CO-PA using account assignment.
Since the production variances are posted as a total in FI during settlement of the production order, you can also choose to assign this posting to CO-PA. The requirements for this are as follows:
u2022     You are working with standard prices for processed materials.
u2022     You have specified in CO-PA Customizing for the relevant production variance account (PRD account) that that account is automatically assigned to CO-PA. For more information, see the section Flow of Actual Values  Direct Posting from FI/MM  Automatic Account Assignment in Customizing.
u2022     You have specified in the appropriate PA transfer structure in FI which value field is the one to which the information is to be transferred.
Production variances are transferred in this case in much the same way as Direct Postings from FI to CO-PA.
When your production order is settled, the variance posting created in FI will be posted to CO-PA if these requirements have been fulfilled. In this way, the production variances are shown at the level of the particular product currently being produced.
This function is available in both costing-based and account-based Profitability Analysis.
Subsequent Allocation of Production Variances Using the Material Ledger
When you use the Material Ledger, you can allocate production variances subsequently across several levels. This means that you can use the quantity flows recorded in the Material Ledger to charge the production variances arising for semi-finished products proportionally to the finished products. During period-end closing in the Material Ledger, the production variances posted temporarily are corrected accordingly in FI and then reposted to the next manufacturing level upwards. Subsequent allocation can only occur for summaries. For more information, see Material Ledger.
To transfer this information to CO-PA, you need to assign the relevant FI postings as described above. It is also possible to transfer the variance categories in parallel. However, the transfer would not be affected by the subsequent allocation due to the summary correction postings.
The requirements for this parallel transfer are the same as those described in the above section entitled "Assigning Production Variances from FI to CO-PA".
This function can be used in both costing-based and account-based Profitability Analysis.
Thanks,
Rau

Windows 7 and Autocad Lt on New Core i7 Imac

Moving over from long time PC user to the Mac world.
I primarily use Autocad LT and will probably use it within Parallels Desktop when my Imac arrives. I only want to transfer my autocad programme from my old pc to the new imac, is there an option to select specific programmes only within the Parallel transfer, or will it take a full snap shot of my PC. Theres a lot of crap on there i really dont want to take over to the new machine.
Alternatively if I install a new copy of Windows 7 and Autocad within Bootcamp, do I have to resinstall Autocad when i run Parallel, or will it see it and run it correctly if I point Parallel in the direction of the Bootcamp drive. I will have to phone autodesk to activate my autocad anyway as I have used up my number of activations, will i have to activate a 2nd time when i run it in parallels ?
I'm trying to minimise my downtime when the new Imac arrives as i work from home and cant afford to be without it.
Thanks in advance.

I am running on less of a machine than you are, so I have experienced similar problems, even when playing back 4 audio tracks while recording 2 all at once (usually with significant plug-ins on the 4 playback tracks).
The easiest solution I've found, without modifying how your plug-ins run, buying hardware, etc., is to "Freeze" the tracks that aren't being worked on at present. It "renders" all of what the plug-ins are doing so that the CPU and hard drive are not taxes nearly as much while playing back. It just takes a few seconds to render them once, and then your playback/recording drops the amount of resources it requires tremendously.
The easiest way to activate a freeze on a track is to right-click on the track name in the Arrange pane, select "Freeze" so the button that looks like a snowflake appears next to each track. You can click and drag down the contiguous tracks that can be frozen to turn the option on (or individually click to turn them on). You will then need to play the project to "render" the tracks and freeze them. Next time you play the project, it will run with many less resources and should save you from seeing that message.
As an aside, you may also want to make sure that you are not running any other applications. I found that another app in the background (Connect360) was running on my Mac and sharing my iTunes to my XBox 360, which was also making a good use of the hard drive at the same time. Any other applications running while Logic is running should be closed to ensure the best performance possible in your audio editing environment.
Hope this helps!
Frank

Post CO88 we want to pass Financial entry

*Post Production Order settlement(CO88) we want to pass financial entry from Price difference account to COGS.*Which is purely financial entry & it should not affect controlling.
But system asks for cost element while passing financial entry.
If we create cost element, Invoice verification (MIRO) will ask for cost object assignment & same is the case in other Financial entries of Price Difference account.
How to pass these Finanacial entries without creating cost element ?
Regards,
Shrirang

Hi,
Transferring Production Variances
Use
To run closed profitability analysis for periods, you need to transfer to CO-PA at the end of the period all the variances that have occurred in that period. Variances typically occur if you valuate your materials with standard prices. At the end of the period, these standard costs are then compared with the actual costs incurred, and this comparison forms the basis for a detailed variance analysis. The variances are finally transferred to CO-PA at the end of the period to produce a factually correct representation of the results.
The variances for cost objects are transferred to CO-PA when production orders, for example, are settled. For a description of how variances arise and what causes them, see the documentation on Cost Object Controlling.
The functions described below are relevant mainly for manufacturing enterprises.
Features
Three ways for transferring production variances are set out below. How you use them depends on your information requirements in CO-PA.
u2022     You might wish, for example, to display the individual variance categories for Cost Object Controlling (CO-PC-OBJ) in CO-PA. In that case, you would settle the variance categories to CO-PA.
u2022     You only need to display the production variances as a total in CO-PA, which is how they are posted to FI. You might not need to calculate cost object variances and only wish to assign the relevant FI posting to CO-PA. In that case, you would post the production variances in FI to CO-PA.
u2022     You implement the Material Ledger (CO-PC-ACT). For the closing operations in Material Ledger, you might not wish to replace just the posted standard prices with the actual costs incurred. At the same time, you might want to subsequently allocate (across multiple levels) production variances to finished products at the end of the period and then display the revised variances in CO-PA. In that case, you would allocate the production variances subsequently using the Material Ledger.
Settling Variance Categories to Profitability Analysis
For the settlement of production orders, you can transfer to CO-PA the variance categories calculated in Cost Object Controlling. The requirements for this are as follows:
u2022     You are working with standard prices for processed materials.
u2022     You have already performed variance calculation in Cost Object Controlling.
u2022     You have entered in the settlement profile for your production order that you wish to settle variances.
u2022     You have set up and assigned a PA transfer structure in Customizing for CO-PA to be used to direct the calculated variance categories into the desired value fields.
The variance categories are settled in a much the same way as that for Settling Orders and Projects. For more information on these requirements, choose Flows of Actual Values  Settling Production Variances in CO-PA Customizing.
When your cost object is settled, the information will be transferred to costing-based CO-PA if these requirements have been fulfilled. In this way, the production variances are shown at the level of the particular product currently being produced. It is only possible to allocate production variances subsequently as a total when the Material Ledger is involved (see below).
The variance categories can only be displayed in value fields. This function is therefore not available in account-based Profitability Analysis.
Assigning Production Variances from FI to CO-PA
If you only need to display production variances as a total as described above, you can alternatively assign the production variances from FI to CO-PA using account assignment.
Since the production variances are posted as a total in FI during settlement of the production order, you can also choose to assign this posting to CO-PA. The requirements for this are as follows:
u2022     You are working with standard prices for processed materials.
u2022     You have specified in CO-PA Customizing for the relevant production variance account (PRD account) that that account is automatically assigned to CO-PA. For more information, see the section Flow of Actual Values  Direct Posting from FI/MM  Automatic Account Assignment in Customizing.
u2022     You have specified in the appropriate PA transfer structure in FI which value field is the one to which the information is to be transferred.
Production variances are transferred in this case in much the same way as Direct Postings from FI to CO-PA.
When your production order is settled, the variance posting created in FI will be posted to CO-PA if these requirements have been fulfilled. In this way, the production variances are shown at the level of the particular product currently being produced.
This function is available in both costing-based and account-based Profitability Analysis.
Subsequent Allocation of Production Variances Using the Material Ledger
When you use the Material Ledger, you can allocate production variances subsequently across several levels. This means that you can use the quantity flows recorded in the Material Ledger to charge the production variances arising for semi-finished products proportionally to the finished products. During period-end closing in the Material Ledger, the production variances posted temporarily are corrected accordingly in FI and then reposted to the next manufacturing level upwards. Subsequent allocation can only occur for summaries. For more information, see Material Ledger.
To transfer this information to CO-PA, you need to assign the relevant FI postings as described above. It is also possible to transfer the variance categories in parallel. However, the transfer would not be affected by the subsequent allocation due to the summary correction postings.
The requirements for this parallel transfer are the same as those described in the above section entitled "Assigning Production Variances from FI to CO-PA".
This function can be used in both costing-based and account-based Profitability Analysis.
Check this link:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/1c/d24b378fc1093ce10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
Thanks,
Rau

Transfer boot camp, parallels, windows to internal drive

My 2011 MBP crashed for the 4th time (bad graphics chips), so I was given a new MBP. They nicely kept the old machine and transferred the HD info over to the new one.
However, they did not transfer any of the boot camp/windows/parallels stuff. I had a $5500 CAD program in there. and lots of files.
Fortunately, I have been doing bootable backups using SuperDuper, so I have an external HD with all the stuff on it. The backup is several weeks old, however, and I don't want to erase the new stuff.
My question is how can I transfer the boot camp partition intact from the external drive to the internal drive?

Cosman wrote:
My 2011 MBP crashed for the 4th time (bad graphics chips), so I was given a new MBP. They nicely kept the old machine and transferred the HD info over to the new one.
However, they did not transfer any of the boot camp/windows/parallels stuff. I had a $5500 CAD program in there. and lots of files.
Fortunately, I have been doing bootable backups using SuperDuper, so I have an external HD with all the stuff on it. The backup is several weeks old, however, and I don't want to erase the new stuff.
My question is how can I transfer the boot camp partition intact from the external drive to the internal drive?
It seems to me probable that on your original HD you must have had a Bootcamp Partition, and that you had Parallels installed and set up to use the Bootcamp partition. Apple did not move your Bootcamp to your new HD so it does not have a Bootcamp partition at all, so when you launch Parallels it can't find an operating system. Unfortunately, as CSound1 says, SuperDuper does not backup Bootcamp partitions so your external HD will not have a backup of your Bootcamp on it. Bootcamp partitions need a completely separate method (Winclone is the best) to back up or transfer to a new HD.
Unless you backed up the Bootcamp Partition some other way, I am afraid you have probably lost everything Windows.
The only remote possibility is that you did actually have a separate Parallels installation which was not using the Bootcamp partition. If this is the case the Parallels Virtual Machine will be on your new hard drive and will be a substantial size compared to one which is simply pointing to a Bootcamp Partition. Parallels VMs are usually installed in username/Documents/Parallels/ but could be somewhere else in your user directory.
If you recover from this situation have a look at Winclone as the best way to backup your Bootcamp Windows partition. Personally I gave up on Bootcamp a few years ago because of the problems of backing up restoring Bootcamp partitions, but that was before Winclone was as good as it is now. A pure Parallels set up is much easier to manage and is fully backed up by Superduper. Parallels is much faster than most Bootcamp devotees realise, and plenty adequate for all except extreme gaming (IMHO).
Another thing to think about in the future is to establish a discipline of testing your backups from time to time.

Migrating, but don't want to transfer partition and Parallels

I am migrating from a white Macbook to aluminum; I do not want to transfer Parallels and the disk partition. How can I transfer all my info and settings except parallels and Windows XP?

I'm not sure but it might be possible to just lift all the data from your HDD to the new HDD. If you're transferring from a plastic model, then you can use the target mode (through firewire) to turn your MacBook into a HDD and then just bulk copy everything over to the new computer- missing out the parallels and such.
Also, if this isn't practical or has too many holes in it, you could invest in a HDD caddy. Take the HDD out of the new Mac and put it into the caddy, then format as Mac journal file system and clone everything from the white onto the caddy.
If neither of these works, you can always transfer everything using the Apple utility then uninstall parallels and reset the partitions- its possible, shouldn't take to long to alter the settings.
Luck

New Mac, old Virtual PC, transfer XP with Parallels?

Hi folks, I'm planning on getting an new Intel Mac and using the transfer option to upgrade from my G5 to get my identity on the new system. (What's that called anyway?) Here's the situation. I have Virtual PC and Windows XP on the current system. I don't want the virtual PC disk to transfer, or if it does, I want to delete it. I was told that if you install Parallels, it has an import option to allow you to transfer the old XP over. I assume you can do that with an ethernet connection to the old system?
Just need help in figuring out the steps...
thanks
Jeff

I assume you can do that with an ethernet connection to the old system?
As long as the virtual image is seen by the Parallels converter it probably doesn't matter how you do it.
Just need help in figuring out the steps...
Probably want to then post on the Parallels forums:
http://forums.parallels.com

Will data transfer in parallel in GPIB interface?

Hi all,
I have two devices (supporting GPIB) connected in serial and connect to the GPIB interface card. Those two devices have two different addresses and I use VISA module to send data in parallel. But the GPIB cables are connected in serial, so does it mean it will be locked when transferring data to one device? I think GPIB transfer rate is not that low (about 1Mbyte/sec) but it takes so long to transfer 500kB to the device (about 45sec).
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Dennis_Knutson wrote:
The GPIB bus does not support parallel data transfers so you are certainly sending it that way.
You have not provided the instrument or your code so it.is impossible to say anything about your transfer rate but the 1MB is a theoretical maximum that you seldom achieve in the real world.
Here is the link for the device I have
http://sine.ni.com/apps/utf8/niid_web_display.download_page?p_id_guid=E3B19B3E9294659CE034080020E748...
The code is not written by me, but I extract the core part and show as below
You will see that there is only one GPIB interface (0), both device 1 and device 2 are connecting to the same card. The data sending to device 1 and device 2 is about 400kB (shown as xxxx.xxxxx. and yyyy.yyyyy).

How can I transfer data between two while loops in parallel

Hello,
I have two while loops in parallel and I want to transfer data from the first to the second loop. The problem isthat data are transfered only when the first loop ends. I tried with queue but it doesn't work. How can I do, preferentially without global variable ?
Thanks.

I join a very simplified VI's because the real works with PXI, RT, ...
When you run the "secondVI.vi", no data comes in array from the "firstVI.vi".
As I said in my first message, I tried with queue too but it doesn't work, because when the terminal go out from the while loop, while loop have to be ended to send data.
Attachments:
transfer_data.zip ‏20 KB

I purchased my first iMac n I installed parallel how can I transfer my pc document? Do I need to install window 7?, I purchased my first iMac n I installed parallel how can I transfer my pc document? Do I need to install window 7?

I purchased my first iMac n I installed parallel how can I transfer my pc document? Do I need to install window 7?, I purchased my first iMac n I installed parallel how can I transfer my pc document? Do I need to install window 7?

Your post is very confusing. It sounds like you want to run Windows 7 using Parallel's software. If so yes you need a full license of Windows 7 and will need to purchase it. Please follow the instructions in the manual you got when you bough Parallel's and if you have difficulty following them you can find support for their product on the Parallel's forums at:
http://forum.parallels.com/forum53.html
Roger

Parallelized transfer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for