PatchManger-2.1 error: "keystore was tampered with"

On solaris9-x86 with PatchManager 2.0 installed, installing cluster patch from 09/30/2005 appears to have clobbered something related to PatchManager as attempts to perform an Update Patch List (from the web interface) fails with the following message:
An unexpected error occured in the management provider. The error was com.sun.patchpro.util.CannotConnectException: Cannot connect to retrieve patchdb: Default SSL context init failed: Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect.
After the cluster patch installation, PM is now 2.1

I've solved the problem after finding this thread
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=136&threadID=488368
Is seems to be a bug in the jdk
(if you change the keystore password you get that error)
and the work around is explained in
the previous thread
I've solved my own problem regenerating the domain
bye

Similar Messages

Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect

Hi Experts:
I am using Apache 1.3.26, JBoss 3.0.0 (embedded with Catalina) on IBM Unix.
When I start my JBoss Server, I get following message wonder why:
2003-03-17 15:13:11,915 INFO [STDOUT] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:566)
2003-03-17 15:13:11,917 ERROR [org.jboss.web.catalina.EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX] Starting failed
LifecycleException: null.open: java.io.IOException: java.io.IOException: Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect
at org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector.initialize(HttpConnector.java:1130)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded.start(Embedded.java:962)
2003-03-17 15:13:11,928 ERROR [org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer] start operation failed on package file:/jboss-3.0.0_tomcat-4.0.3/server/default/deploy/$
LifecycleException: null.open: java.io.IOException: java.io.IOException: Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect
at org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector.initialize(HttpConnector.java:1130)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded.start(Embedded.java:962)
at org.jboss.web.catalina.EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX.startService(EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX.java:189)
at org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.start(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:162)
2003-03-17 15:13:11,934 ERROR [org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer] could not start deployment: file:/jboss-3.0.0_tomcat-4.0.3/server/default/deploy/tomca$
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: null.open; - nested throwable: (LifecycleException: null.open: java.io.IOException: java.io.IOException: Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect
Caused by: LifecycleException: null.open: java.io.IOException: java.io.IOException: Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect
at org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector.initialize(HttpConnector.java:1130)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded.start(Embedded.java:962)
It seems that major issues is "KEYSTORE WAS TAMPERED or PASSWORD was INCORRECT" - I have no idea what this means.
Can anyone throw light on this please?
THANKS!

my first guess is that you forgot to add the Factory entry within the CoyoteSSL connector that specifies where the key file is found as well as the password. can you verify that?

SSL Init failed: Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect

Hi all,
I encountered the following error while I try to get the output stream to write out the content into an HTTPS connection.
java.net.SocketException: Default SSL context init failed: Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect
     at javax.net.ssl.DefaultSSLSocketFactory.createSocket(Unknown Source)
     at sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsClient.afterConnect(Unknown Source)
     at sun.net.www.protocol.https.AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.connect(Unknown Source)
     at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getOutputStream(Unknown Source)
     at sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getOutputStream(Unknown Source)Below is my code to achieve the sending of the content to the HTTPS connection.
public void sendMessage(Properties headers, byte[] content) throws Exception
    try
      addRequestHeaders(headers);
      _conn.setRequestMethod("POST");
      _conn.setDoInput(true);
      _conn.setDoOutput(true);
      OutputStream os = _conn.getOutputStream();//this line lead to the exception
      os.write(content);
      _respCode = _conn.getResponseCode();
      _respMsg = _conn.getResponseMessage();
    catch (IOException ex)
      throw ex
}Due to the server is deployed in clustered env, I have put the truststore and keystore in a shared folder which allows the nodes to access. Thus in my code I have set the truststore, keystore location and the truststore, keystore password in the System properties as follow.
      System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.keyStore", getKeyStore());
      System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword", getKeyStorePass());
      System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStore", getTrustStore());
      System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword", getTrustStore());The getKeyStore() and getTrustStore() will be returned the path to the shared folder which contain the truststore/keystore respectively.
The keystore tampered error only happened intermitently. I am sure that my keystore and truststore password is set correctly.
Could I know that is the keystore designed in a way that it can be accessed by multiple thread? will there be any file locking on the keystore while two thread trying to init the HTTPS and eventually cause the keystore tampered problem?
Thanks

In my case, I am certain that all fields are correct, because the code works half the time. The thing is my code is running inside Tomcat (as a servlet); I am noticing that whenever I update my Jar with any code change and restart Tomcat, I am hitting this issue intermittently. Another update-and-restart sometimes solves the problem & my connection establishment is successful.
There are 2 key things I would like to know:
1) Difference b/w the exception messages "<span class="jive-subject"> Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect
" and " failed to decrypt safe contents entry ".
2) Whether any caching is going on because of Tomcat being in the picture (although I am not at all sure why this should happen).
Would love to get through with this ASAP. Please let me know your thoughts if any.
Thanks,
Vivek

Mountain lion copy was tampered with or corrupted

Taking all day to install ML on my Early 2011 MBP.
Here are my specs: 120 GB Cherryville Intel SSD + 500 GB WD Scorpio Blue in the optical bay.
Wanted to do a fresh install of ML over Lion but that didn't go well. After formatting my SSD and trying to install from 8 GB Flash Drive (mounted and formatted to InstallESD.dmg) it said "Could not download all needed packages" or something like that. Tried 6 times. Luckily I had my original HDD still with all my old stuff on it. I booted from that and downloaded Lion again. After installing Lion, now it says "ML copy was tampered with or corrupted, delete this copy and download from App Store". I have done this like 6 times and still getting the same error message! Yes, I have fixed disk permissions and verified the disk, cleaned the cache and still won't go.
Any help would be appreciated.

I encountered the same error "…can't be verified…" error on my 2010 MBP too. Tried six times and finally I could get it installed. Here's what I did:
Went to "Users & Groups" in System Preferences, checked that the Apple ID specified for the current user is the same Apple ID I used in the download purchase of ML from the App Store.
Rebooted in Safe Mode.
Went to Disk Utility -> Repair Disk Permissions
Downloaded ML at midnight (and the download was significantly faster!)
Rebooted in Normal Mode.
Ran the ML Installer.

I am facing issue when opening flash files in Flash CC. (Error : - .fla was created with a later version of Adobe Flash Professional CC and might contain new features not supported in this version of Flash professional.)

I am facing issue when opening flash files in Flash CC. (Error : - .fla was created with a later version of Adobe Flash Professional CC and might contain new features not supported in this version of Flash professional.)

fyfesa1970 wrote:
Ask a simple question and get a simple answer...see below...hilarious:
All representatives are actively assisting other customers. Your estimated wait time is 0 minute(s) and 1 second(s) or longer. Thank you for your patience.
We all can learn from this. Whenever you get stuck in a customer-service situation that goes nowhere, as soon as you become aware of the futility, get the name and employee ID of the person, then say, "I don't mean to be rude, I think we're both wasting our time. Perhaps you weren't trained for this issue, or perhaps your system isn't displaying the correct information. It doesn't matter, because I'm not getting proper customer support this way. Please ESCALATE this to your highest-level manager IMMEDIATELY. If that person isn't availabe, ESCALATE me to that person's highest-level manager. If you haven't been given the proper training, you can use this to inform your manager that you need the training. Thanks for trying to help. I appreciate it. I have copied and saved this chat session. NOW PLEASE ESCALATE THIS CASE AS I HAVE REQUESTED ABOVE. I'm waiting now... "
The point is that you're a customer, and the company needs customers, so the individual who's failing to deliver good service needs to be identified so they can be properly trained, and so that problems in the system can also be identified, but more important is that you get the service you're entitled to.
If you search the forum for similar questions, you'll see the kind of information that the volunteer users like yourself on the forum need to know about your system and files involved, so they can help you better.
Good luck.
HTH
Regards,
Peter
Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices

Bought new, discovered it was tampered with or refurbished, now at a loss with horrible customer service and dead phone

I'm wondering where to go after 2 weeks playing CS phone tag, started with a tech call reguarding Iphone 5, battery issue, tech ran test, batt is consumed, went thru warranty talk then to Apple, as to our surprise once the serial number was ran , I purchased a bran new refurbished and battery previously swapped out phone thru our corporate Ver store, warranty is invalid and new batt was 80$, Apple tech was shocked... I let that settle for a few days, and began the worst ordeal and crap show of customer service since, I've made numerous calls, 1st being with christopher, whom claimed he talked with his supervisor and I was patient, talked about that they wouldn't swap battery, but replace phone with a refurb phone, contract is up 2/03/2015 , exlplained it would be less hassle and givin the time frame to renew contract and do the upgrade now, pay the upgrade cost and whatever, we are good customers , never file claims, or issues with contracts, seems simples, I've now talked to approx 5 supervisors from ID, ky, al and whom have alllllll confrimed they have taken notes, processed requests and will call back in such time, as of 4pm dec 7th I am no where fast, contract can not be upgraded, one supervisor claimed they where no longer making the iPhone 5? And would allow for a upgrade once she talked to tech service, however a magical cold transfer and 40 more minutes of retelling this insaine story, he was then going call back on a dif number so the issue ph could be used, never got the call, however Matt in ID WHO claimed such sympathy for all the hassle then texted me saying he couldn't get thru on my number, however could text, and by a tech texting myself , such poor grammar and then stating we could only have the 5 and 6+ 's are on back order. Beyond fed up and stressed, almost 6 hours on the phone and 10 days of hassle , yet we still have a phone that dies at 70% ....I've never seen such a lack of responsibly or communication , seems supervisors are really good at making statements to appease each situation with out any documentation . Can't bring myself to call again and go thru the issue over and over again, meanwhile getting same responses (excuses) from every area I've spoke to. Guess now when I purchase Verizon items I call good Ol Apple and run the serial numbers to make sure the fancy kindalooksnewplastic isn't the 2nd re wrap and buy a phone that's been tampered with and makes your monthly insurance and warrantys invalid . Money well spent kudos CS ...and no I'm not hunting down anyone via Twitter , I'm sure there's notes on our account that this crazy person is out of patience and trying to see what other cell company we could change to . Merry Christmas

To clarify , we haven't serviced nor replaced the consumed battery . It has been noted as per Apple running the serial number that PRIOR to my purchasing the device, it had the battery replaced. Undocumented in detail, but showed up in Apple reports as replaced. Therefor creates a much wider issue than consumed battery issue, now we have the fact that 1. I paid for a new iPhone 5 16g with a renewed 2 yr contract, pay monthly for insurance on the device, however being that it has been worked on, that voided the 1 yr warranty and possibly the extended insurance program warranty as well, my corperate store can't handle this issue, given the extent of details, I stopped there today, to double check my receipt for original purchase to see if there was a CPO listed on my receipt, that is when they informed me they didn't acttially sell them there, nor if I did I wouldn't have paid full contract price either. More details, more time wasted on Verizon, knowing you all won't read the "fine" print.

System Refresh SAPINST.exe error ExeProcs was executed with status Error

Hi Everyone,
                     As part of system refresh, our QA ECC is restored with Production Data backup. In this process, sapinst.exe is executed to perform homogeneous system copy steps. This process is being terminated with error at the step *"Create SAP stored procedures"*.
The error being displayed is as follows:
An error occurred while processing option SAP Toools for MS SQL Server > Database Copy Completion( Last error reported by the step: Errors when executing sql command: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The specified @job_name ('SAP CCMS_qpe_QPE_Update_Tabstats') does not exist.
SOLUTION: If this message is displayed as a warning, you can ignore it. If this is an error, contact SAP support.
). You can now:
Choose Retry to repeat the current step.
Choose View Log to get more information about the error.
Stop the option and continue with it later.
Log files are written to C:\Program Files/sapinst_instdir/MSS/CPY.
sapinst.log file contains following information:
INFO 2010-11-06 17:40:30
Copied file 'C:/Program Files/sapinst_instdir/ERP/LM/COPY/MSS/SYSTEM/DISTRIBUTED/AS-ABAP/DB/inifile.xml' to 'C:/Program Files/sapinst_instdir/ERP/LM/COPY/MSS/SYSTEM/DISTRIBUTED/AS-ABAP/DB/inifile.4.xml'.
INFO 2010-11-06 17:40:30
Copied file 'C:/Program Files/sapinst_instdir/ERP/LM/COPY/MSS/SYSTEM/DISTRIBUTED/AS-ABAP/DB/inifile.xml' to 'C:/Program Files/sapinst_instdir/ERP/LM/COPY/MSS/SYSTEM/DISTRIBUTED/AS-ABAP/DB/inifile.5.xml'.
INFO 2010-11-06 17:40:31
Execute step
Component W2K_ServicePack_Check|ind|ind|ind|ind
Preprocess of component |NW_ABAP_DB|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|NW_First_Steps|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|W2K_ServicePack_Check|ind|ind|ind|ind|2|0.
INFO 2010-11-06 17:40:41
Copied file 'C:/Program Files/sapinst_instdir/ERP/LM/COPY/MSS/SYSTEM/DISTRIBUTED/AS-ABAP/DB/keydb.xml' to 'C:/Program Files/sapinst_instdir/ERP/LM/COPY/MSS/SYSTEM/DISTRIBUTED/AS-ABAP/DB/keydb.3.xml'.
INFO 2010-11-06 17:40:41
Execute step ExeProcs of component |NW_ABAP_DB|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|NW_CreateDBandLoad|ind|ind|ind|ind|8|0|NW_CreateDB|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|NW_MSS_DB|ind|ind|ind|ind|2|0|MssSysCopy|ind|ind|ind|ind|10|0|MssProcs|ind|ind|ind|ind|4|0.
ERROR 2010-11-06 17:40:58
FCO-00011 The step ExeProcs with step key |NW_ABAP_DB|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|NW_CreateDBandLoad|ind|ind|ind|ind|8|0|NW_CreateDB|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|NW_MSS_DB|ind|ind|ind|ind|2|0|MssSysCopy|ind|ind|ind|ind|10|0|MssProcs|ind|ind|ind|ind|4|0|ExeProcs was executed with status ERROR .
Our Environment details:
SAP Version : ECC6
OS                 : Microsoft windows server 2003
DB                 : Microsoft SQL Server         2005.
Can some please guide me in debugging this issue. Your help is highly appreciated.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Kind Regards,
Bharani.

Hi Satya,
             Thank you for the reply. QA in our landsacpe was in use since 2008. Serveral times system refresh is carried out on our QA with production data but never came accross this issue.
             Usually if the SAPINST.exe run is successfull, temperory licence will be installed and we will be allowed to login into the sytem with our user names normally and carry out post installation steps.
             As the SAPISNT.exe is being terminated, temperory license is not being installed and we got to work around by including parameter to allow default sap* userid and password to login and install license and carry on with the post installation steps. To be frank this issue is not really a show stopper, but there seems to be an issue that is to be resolved.
Thank you,
Kind Regards,
Bharani.

Purchased premiere/photoshop elements box was tampered with

i Ijust opened my "new" box from Amazon Only to find the top was ripped right where you could see the serial numbers. FML
is there a way to check and see if the serial numbers work? I plan on installing it on two computers, but one at a later date this year. It makes me feel a little sick thinking someone else already has seen them. Sloppy seconds.

granpann
I would advise you to contact Amazon immediately either to ask for return/complete refund or replacement with no charge for the resending.
Do not waste any time in doing that. Include a picture of the damage with your return to Amazon if any question.
ATR

ATT says my 3G MicroCell has been tampered with!!

I have had this unit for 3 months. It worked for the first two months and then stopped working. I called ATT to troubleshoot or replace unit and they said it was tampered with and that there was nothing they could do. MY UNIT IS BRAND NEW. AND NEVER USED OTHER THAN PLUGGING IT IN AND UNPLUGGING IT. I read that 6 pins come flying out to set this tamper alarm off. My unit is in perfect condition. If ATT thinks they can use this as an excuse to not return a device I am literally appallled. I have been a customer for over 10 years. David

Yeah something is not quite right. By brand new, did you buy it directly from AT&T or did you purchase it "new" off of eBay?
The anti-tamper clips are inside and set in such a way so that if the unit is opened, it is very difficult to reseat them which renders the unit useless. The clips (at least on the white models) can come loose if the unit is dropped on the floor or knocked over (the cat knocked it over for example).
So.....
New from AT&T? IF so, which model (white or black)
Does it rattle if you shake it gently?
How did it stop working? (what is the problem).
I believe the warranty on brand new, purchased from AT&T is one year so you would certainly qualify for a warranty replacement if it is a defective unit.

Kerberos - tampering with ticket cache

Hello,
sorry if this is allready posted here, I couldn't fing it.
I'm using the Kerberos ver.5 Login Modul in JAAS to authenticate users (Java version is 1.4.2). I'm also using SSO mechanisms of Kerberos, so with kinit I make a ticket for myself into the ticket cache and I'm using it withou re-contacting the KDC nor requiring password again.
But I just find out, that when I take a HexEditor, and edit the ticket cache, I could easily change my name in that ticket (eg. to "admin" or other). After this the JAAS Login Modul does not recognize the change, and yells "admin" succesfully logged in. Now letting anybody work with admin privileges is not what I dreamed about! This is not the bug that I can live with!
Is there any method to recognize that the Ticket Cache was tampered with? Or any other suggestions?
Thanks in advance

Hi
Yes, I would like to know how to use kinit programmatically too! The whole mechanism doesn't really make sense to me - I would have thought the Krb5LoginModule, if configured with useTicketCache=true, would call kinit itself if it found an empty/expired ticket in the cache, and then used that cache for susbsequent operations. Is the version of kinit that comes with the JDK written in Java? Where's the source code?? In single sign on, surely we want to update the cache quite often e.g. at the start of each day. The only way I can see of doing this is by getting the use to do this manually (urghhh), or calling the kinit.exe program from Java, which doesn't sound too great either. I wonder if this is what most people do.....
I did get out my hex editor and edit the cache as it happens - and it did indeed throw an exception (see below). Interestingly it seems to have got past the login stage, but as expected when the GSS communication begins, the handshaking between client and server fails. Here's the full stack trace I got:
PS I'd be interested in your thoughts on the use of kinit....
Connected to server localhost/127.0.0.1
KrbException: Identifier doesn't match expected value (906)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.af.a(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.ae.a(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.ae.<init>(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.KrbTgsRep.<init>(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.KrbTgsReq.getReply(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.az.a(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.az.a(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.Credentials.acquireServiceCreds(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.jgss.krb5.Krb5Context.initSecContext(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.initSecContext(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.initSecContext(Unknown Source)
at SampleClient.main(SampleClient.java:144)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at MyAction.run(Login.java:212)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAsPrivileged(Unknown Source)
at Login.main(Login.java:177)
KrbException: Integrity check on decrypted field failed (31) - PROCESS_TGS
at sun.security.krb5.KrbTgsRep.<init>(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.KrbTgsReq.getReply(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.az.a(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.az.a(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.Credentials.acquireServiceCreds(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.jgss.krb5.Krb5Context.initSecContext(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.initSecContext(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.initSecContext(Unknown Source)
at SampleClient.main(SampleClient.java:144)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at MyAction.run(Login.java:212)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAsPrivileged(Unknown Source)
at Login.main(Login.java:177)
Caused by: KrbException: Identifier doesn't match expected value (906)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.af.a(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.ae.a(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.krb5.internal.ae.<init>(Unknown Source)
... 17 more
java.security.PrivilegedActionException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAsPrivileged(Unknown Source)
at Login.main(Login.java:177)
Caused by: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at MyAction.run(Login.java:214)
... 3 more
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at MyAction.run(Login.java:212)
... 3 more
Caused by: GSSException: No valid credentials provided (Mechanism level: Integrity check on decrypted field failed (31) - PROCESS_TGS)
at sun.security.jgss.krb5.Krb5Context.initSecContext(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.initSecContext(Unknown Source)
at sun.security.jgss.GSSContextImpl.initSecContext(Unknown Source)
at SampleClient.main(SampleClient.java:144)
... 8 more

Keystore tampered with problems on Linux

Hi,
I am running a couple of java applications that communicate via HTTPS/SSL. When these applications are run under Win32, they run perfectly with no errors. However, if they are run under Linux, with the exact same certificate files that worked just fine under Windows, I get an exception error that states that the keystore has been tampered with or the password is incorrect. Has anyone seen this before?

These are ascii files, are they not? (The ones with ---BEGIN CERTIFICATE---/---END CERTIFICATE--- lines?)
If so, try stripping the DOS newlines (^Ms) from the file (if you have just copied the file over). Don't know if this has any effect.

HT4864 I am getting a triangle with an exclamation point next to my inbox...it says: There may be a problem with the mail server or network. Verify the settings for account "MobileMe" or try again. The server returned the error: Mail was unable to log in

I can send but cannot recieve email
This is the messege I am gewtting:
There may be a problem with the mail server or network. Verify the settings for account “MobileMe” or try again.
The server returned the error: Mail was unable to log in to the IMAP server “p02-imap.mail.me.com” using “Password” authentication. Verify that your account settings are correct.
The server returned the error: Service temporarily unavailable

Also if I go to system preferences accounts and re-enter the password it fixes the glitch sometimes.

I tried down loading mozilla firefox to use as a web browser. It was downloaded 100% then when prompted to "run" the error message comes up with a red cross and the message'This file is corrupted" and won't let me proceed. What do I do now?

I tried down loading mozilla firefox to use as a web browser. It was downloaded 100% then when prompted to "run" An error message comes up with a red cross and the message'This file is corrupted" and won't let me proceed. What do I do now?

It is possible that your anti-virus software is corrupting the downloaded files or otherwise interfering with downloading files by Firefox.<br />
You can try to disable the real-time (live) scanning of files in your anti-virus software temporarily to see if that makes downloading work.
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Unable_to_save_or_download_files

I have design standard with creative cloud, I have installed this on 2 computers, my office and home which I was told was allowed, I have just tried to open an indesign file from the office at home and and error message said that this was created with a n

I have design standard with creative cloud, I have installed this on 2 computers, my office and home which I was told was allowed, I have just tried to open an indesign file from the office at home and and error message said that this was created with a newer version? they are the same versions and both are up to date, I was asked this morning to put in my adobe id email and password to connect to CC which I have never been asked to do before, can anyone help?

what's your home version (click help>about) and was that just a warning so you were able to open the file?

Getting error while configuring SharePoint 2013 that "SocketException was thrown with SocketError ConnectionRefused"

Hi,
I am installing the SharePoint-2013 on development virtual machine. and i have the following environment.
Windows server : 2012
SQL server 2012(enterprise edition)
Active directory(domain) is configured on same server.
for SharePoint configuration purpose i had created SP_farm account with SQL server DB_creator,security admin etc rights.
even though m facing this issue related with socket exception.
Error in log file :
04/08/2014 12:26:33 1 INF Trying to see if port 35513 is free on machine SHAREPOINT2013. Min port we will try is
1024, Max port we will try is 49151
04/08/2014 12:26:35 1 INF A SocketException was thrown with SocketError ConnectionRefused
04/08/2014 12:26:35 1 INF Connect has been refused for port 35513, so we will consider this a free port
04/08/2014 12:26:35 1 INF Have not found a free port yet. Number of tries is 1. Min port we will try is 1024, Max
port we will try is 49151
04/08/2014 12:26:35 1 INF Adding port 35513 to the exclusion list so it is not chosen again during this run
So m bit confuse about is this error related to network issue or something else that i have to configure on server.
any suggestion or reply will be appreciated..!:-)
Shiv

Is the firewall turned on?
Regards, Matthew
MCPD | MCITP
My Blog
View
Matthew Yarlett's profile
See my webpart on the TechNet Gallery that allows administrative users to upload, crop and format user profile photos. Check it out here:
Upload and Crop User Profile Photos

PatchManger-2.1 error: "keystore was tampered with"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for