Payment Clearing: Use of Main & Sub Transation on Payment Items.

Hi.
I have been given a requirement to use a different main/sub-transaction (HVORG/TVORG) value for payment items depending on whether the payment item is cleared or whether it results in an overpayment.
Eg A customer has an outstanding invoice of EUR1000. Two payments are made, one for EUR1000 and the other for EUR500. The main/sub-transaction on the EUR500 payment item will be changed to a different value because it has resulted in an overpayment.
Can you think of any reason why you might want to do this?
Does this proposal make any sense? I am a bit concerned about implementing this into a solution.
Would appreciate any input.
Regards.
Mick.

Hi there,
the catalog parameter in the webservice refers to the repository, while the catalogs sub table refers to the product catalogs (ie: list of items from suppliers).
validity period may be used in a constraint to define named searches and trigger the visibility of items depending on the date. (with SRM-MDM Catalog v1.0 SP1 or with upcoming v2.0)
Regards
David

Similar Messages

ME2DP & Down Payment Clearing LIV

Dear All,
I am facing three issues while creating and clearing down payment through ME2DP and MIRO.
1- While clearing down payment in MIRO, system is not clearing FI down payment document automatically. At the time of posting,, system generate two documents, one is Invoice and other is Down Payment.
2- After posting Invoice in MIRO with Down Payment clearing button, Status Red is activated in ME2DP which was green after creating down payment.
3- After executing all the entries from Procure to Payment, there is still Down Payment request outstanding in Purchase Order History.
Waiting for reply!
Regards
AJ

Hi Abdul,
The purpose of using ME2DP is you can enter down payment data in purchase orders at header and item level.
You can use the down payment clearing function to clear down payments that you have posted with reference to a purchase order directly in logistics invoice verification (without going to the relevant financial accounting transactions).
If you perform down payment clearing in logistics invoice verification, when you enter an incoming invoice for a purchase order, the system proposes all down payments that have been posted with reference to the purchase order and that are not yet completely cleared, for down payment clearing. The system posts the down payment clearing document together with the invoice document.
By using ME2DP you can avoid making the down payment clearing in financial accounting as it will get cleared while posting MIRO.
Also, refer this note 1637282
Hope you will get some idea.
Regards
Shashi

Link between invoice no and payment clearing document no

Hi sap gurus,
in a reoprt i have to show the payment receive date against the invoice no. i can have the invoice no by customer no (KUNNR) and date range. now i am facing problem how to link invoice document no with payment clearing document no. Because while receiving payment from customer (t code F-28) we are receiving against a invoice. But i checked in BSEG,BSID BSAD but nowhere i was able to track the linkage. Please help.
regards,
BKR

In billing document at header level, you can see two fields, viz.
a) XBLNR Reference Document Number and
b) ZUONR Assignment number
These two fields you can see in FBL5N. Whatever copy control you set in VTFL at header level for these two fields, based on that values will be populated in billing document which will then be passed on to FI just for information.
But these two fields are not stored in any table but in structure. However, you can check in BKPF with field XBLNR which will have link between VBRK (billing document ) and BKPF (Accounting document)
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

SEPA - How to control payment method used for SEPA during invoice entry?

Hi,
To implement SEPA Credit Transfers, a new payment method must be created.
But this payment method will coexist with other payment methods that can be used for EUR payments between non-SEPA countries...
Is there a way to control during invoice entry that the user is using the right payment method? Thus, if the payment is to be made between two SEPA countries, is there a way to control that the payment method used is well the new SEPA payment method? These pmts would fall in error if OSS note 1406227 has been implemented (it creates a table that controls the validity of pmt methods per country of destination) but obviously, we want to control this before the payment run F110...
Or is it only controllable via a user-exit?
Thanks a lot!
Rgds
Vincent
Edited by: Vincent_Belgium on Dec 30, 2010 3:22 PM
Edited by: Vincent_Belgium on Dec 30, 2010 3:26 PM

Hi,
You need to Use User Exit MEVME001 in SAP as well please see the below link for more
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/price-difference-po-iv-vendor.htm
Regards
Ninad Kshirsagar

How to get the pop up of Down Payment Clearing while posting an Invoice using MIRO tcode

Hi,
I am having a requirement where I need to display the Down Payment Clearing pop up.
Scenario: While posting an Invoice, user have to check whether he had done any downpayment for the Purchase Order, if so, then there will be a Information displayed saying "Down Payment for Purchase Order xxxxxxxxx exist". Then user has to click the Down Payment Clearing button in the header level, then a pop up window is displayed.
But now my requirement is when the Information Message is displayed, if I click enter button to goto next screen, that time itself I need to display the Down Payment Clearing pop window, rather than clicking the down payment clearing button in the header level.
Kindly suggest any user exit or badi to do this customization
Thanks & Regards,
Karthikeyan G.

Hi,
At the time of entering the invoice from MIRO/FB60, system gives a pop-up for downpayment clearing. If you go in the help, the following thing is mentioned in the part Procedure.
Procedure
Check whether a transfer posting or a clearing of special G/L transactions (for example down payments) is necessary after you have posted the present document.
Here SAP has clearly mentioned that we can do the clearing after posting of this document.
Regards,
Amit
Edited by: amit kulkarni on Nov 13, 2009 2:53 PM

Main Sub not displayed correctly on the FPL9

Hello Experts,
We have requirement to credit the GL account only after payment is received against the specific receivable e.g. $ 20 charge posted on the account and $ 18 payment clears the charge partially then crediting the GL account for $ 18. In order to achieve this we are using statistical posting logic. First defined main sub (e.g. Statistical 00XX 00AA) with statistical key 'G' and mapped these statistical sub to real subs using posting area 1010 (e.g. Real 00XX 00BB). Also defined liability GL account for these real subs (00XX 00BB) in EK02 and in FQZB (against MAIN transaction "00XX" and not against SUBs). Now, the problem is - payment clears the $ 20 charge correctly, it credits the liability GL correctly, and it also updates tables such as DFKKOP with required new entry of (REAL SUB i.e. 00XX 00BB) line but it doesn't show that line correctly on the FPL9 screen. It shows cleared $ 18 line item with statistical MAIN SUB (00XX 00AA).
Am I missing something here? Could you please help me to resolve this issue. Please also let me know if you think there is better way to address this requirement.
Regards,
A-jay.

Hi Dany,
It sound like tyou are trying to localize your application to Japanese. You might want to take a loot at this link here
Joe Daily
National Instruments
Applications Engineer
may the G be with you ....

How to display the button 'Down payment clearing ' in Billing document

Dear Gurus:
If I used transation code F-39 ,I can do down payment clearing for billing document .But I want to do this in transation code VF01 .
Can any one guide me how to do down payment clearing in billing document.

Could you please share your exactly requirement.
Regards,
Manoranjan.

Error -Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area

When I am trying to pass a down payment entry by debiting vedor and crediting bank with asset it is giving an error as follows.
Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area 01
Message no. AU133
Please help me to rectify the same.
Thanks in advance
Deepak

HI
Please pay attention at the possible causes of message AU133:
1. Error AU133:
   a) You have not defined a contra account for acquisition value postings in the Asset Accounting Customizing settings (Transaction AO90).However, this is required as of Release 4.6C because, as is the case for all other integration postings in Asset Accounting, invoice receipt postings have to be displayed in Asset Accounting via the new posting kernel to ensure an identical document
structure.
   b) You have defined the account in Asset Accounting, however, it is not created in the affected company code.Check whether the account is correct and create it for the company code, if necessary.
2. You have entered an asset reconciliation account for the "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" (for example, the same account as for   "Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs" account).This is not permitted.Check whether your account determination is correct
   (Transaction AO90) in Asset Accounting Customizing. The same applies
   for the 'Contra account: Down payment posting'.
3. As "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" you entered an asset G/L account. If necessary change the automatic posting indicator in the G/L account master record.
4.Check if you need revaluation accounts in depreciation areas involved   (AO90):
-Revaluation acquis. and production costs
-Offsetting account: Revaluation APC
Please run also programm RACKONTO where missing or wrong customizing
the accoutn determinations per company code is displayed
Also have a look at note 7595 in this regard.
Please assign points if it useful.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

AP Payment Upload Using API or Interface

Hi ,
I had requirement to upload the AP payment information using API or Interface. I have the below code. But is showing some "Unexpected" error.
declare
p_num_printed_docs NUMBER;
p_payment_id NUMBER;
p_paper_doc_num NUMBER;
p_pmt_ref_num NUMBER;
p_return_status VARCHAR2(200);
p_error_ids_tab IBY_DISBURSE_SINGLE_PMT_PKG.trxnErrorIdsTab;
p_msg_count NUMBER;
p_msg_data VARCHAR2(200);
begin
MO_GLOBAL.SET_POLICY_CONTEXT('S',84); --- Apps intialize
fnd_global.apps_initialize(1823,20639,200); --- Apps intialize
IBY_DISBURSE_SINGLE_PMT_PKG.SUBMIT_SINGLE_PAYMENT(
p_api_version => 1.0,
p_init_msg_list => fnd_api.g_false,
p_calling_app_id => 200,
p_calling_app_payreq_cd => '13011',
p_is_manual_payment_flag => 'Y',
p_payment_function => 'PAYABLES_DISB',
p_internal_bank_account_id => 10000, -----12001,
p_pay_process_profile_id => 161,
p_payment_method_cd => 'CLEARING',
p_legal_entity_id => 23324,
p_organization_id => 84,
p_organization_type => '',
p_payment_date => sysdate,
p_payment_amount => 111,
p_payment_currency => 'USD',
p_payee_party_id => 91678,
p_payee_party_site_id => 45272,
p_supplier_site_id => '',
p_payee_bank_account_id => '',
p_override_pmt_complete_pt => 'N',
p_bill_payable_flag => 'N',
p_anticipated_value_date => '',
P_MATURITY_DATE => '',
p_payment_document_id => 1,
p_paper_document_number => '',
p_printer_name => '',
p_print_immediate_flag => '',
p_transmit_immediate_flag => '',
x_num_printed_docs => p_num_printed_docs,
x_payment_id => p_payment_id,
x_paper_doc_num => p_paper_doc_num,
x_pmt_ref_num => p_pmt_ref_num,
x_return_status => p_return_status,
x_error_ids_tab => p_error_ids_tab,
x_msg_count => p_msg_count,
x_msg_data => p_msg_data
commit;
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ( p_return_status || '---''---' || p_msg_data || '--''--' || p_msg_count );
IF p_msg_count = 1 THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ( p_return_status || '---''---' || p_msg_data || '--''--' || p_msg_count );
ELSIF p_msg_count > 1 THEN
FOR i IN 1..p_msg_count LOOP
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ( i||'. ' || fnd_msg_pub.get (p_encoded => fnd_api.g_false) );
END LOOP;
ELSE
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (p_return_status);
END IF;
end;
If anyone knows the solution please respond quickly. This is quite urgent requirement. If I am not using right API then please suggest as well. This requirement for Oracle Apps R12
Regards,
Prakash

Hi,
Can you please advise if you had a response for your message.
Regards,
Sunil

Down Payment clearing in f-54

Hi Sap Gurus,
We use f-48 to enter down payments, and f-54 to clear these down payments. We are also deducting tds while making down payments to the taxable vendors as per income tax rules.
In case of Invoices posted using fb60 every thing is going fine But in case of Invoices posted through MIRO i am unable to clear the down payment the scenario is as follows:-
At the time of down Pymt :
vednor Dr      100
bank cr            80
tds credit         20
at the time of miro 1st invoice
vendor credit 40
tds credit 10
gl dr   50
at the time of miro 2nd invoice
vendor credit 40
tds credit 10
gl dr   50
Now i have to clear the down payment with these invoices. Please Suggest.
Regards,
Deepak
Now when i am clearing this down payment
Edited by: deemon on Jun 30, 2010 6:11 AM
Edited by: deemon on Jun 30, 2010 6:14 AM

I cannot see a relation to ABAP development, please post in the respective functional forum, probably Financials.
Thread locked.
Thomas

Issue regarding partial payment & cleared items.

hi Techies,
I want to develop report which should show all cleared item. (accounting document no, corresponiding basic amount). End user is using residual clearence procedure for partial payment. i.e.,
consider if vendor has to pay rs 10000 as service tax to company , its stored in open items against one Accountin Document no.
Belnr            Amt
000101 -
> 10,000
supppoes he pays 3000
system is creating one clearing document against this 3000 payment.
NOW REST OF 7000 EARLIER CLERING DOCUMENT IS BECOME ACCOUNTING DOCUENT . THIS CYCLE IS CONTINE UNTIL CLEARS ALL THE AMOUNT.
INTIAL STATE.
000101 -
> 10,000 -
> CL1. (PAID 3000)
SECOND STATE
CL1        -
>   7,000----
> CL2 (PAID 3000)
THIRD STATE
CL2        -
>   4,000----
> CL3 (PAID 3000)
FOURTH STATE
CL3        -
>   1,000----
> CL4 (PAID 1000)
FIFTH STATE
CL4        -
>   1,000----
> CL5 CLEARS ALL AMT
HE WANT TO DISPALAY ACCOUNTING DOCUMETN NO WHICH ARE CLOSED (I.E. CLEARED )
AT THE END OF FIFTH STATE ONLY THIS ACCOUNTING DOCUMENT NO SHOULD DISPLAY IN REPORT OTHEWISE NOT.( IE IF USER RUN THE REPORT AT SECOND OR THIRD STATE, THE ACCUNTING DOCUMENT NO SHOULD NOT DISPLAY )
THERE IS NO LIMIT OF PARTIAL PAYMETNS I.E VENDOR CAN PAY HIS AMOUNT AS MANY TIEMS HE WISHES.
IS THERE ANY SOLUTION TO THIS REPORT...
REGARDS
RAJU

Hi,
Yes it is possible.
Check the docuement types of the documents, you should get the answer in that.
Regards,
Prakash Pandey

Customer open items not getting cleared using F-28 OR F-30

If I use F-28 OR F-30, to create in coming payments manually, when I do FBL5N for the Open items, I see that Customer Payments are still reflected in the Open items. I expect that since I made the payment against the invoice the Open items should be cleared, why is this not happening?

all right MN,
i guess figured it out as to what could be the problem with you..... here is an example what you have been throuhg
you see the thing is your invoice was of 396/- $
which has a discount of suppose 2%
now the total amount the customer has to pay is 388.08$
but what you actually recieved is less than what the customer had to pay lets say 380 $
now what you might have done is according my analysis is that
you cleared the invoice with 380 $ with out actly changing the discount amount , because the amount after discount was 388.08 $ but you cleared it with 380$ which means still the system says the customer has to pay a the balance 8.08$...
now what you need to do is to go back to the tcode F-32 and try to change the disc amount to an amount that would make the invoice amount equal to what the customer has paid. and then try to clear the transactioin....
and one more thing i feel tcode f-28 is much better than tcode f-30 to avoid complications
regards
sayeed

Payment through using payment method "W"

Hi All,
We have to create a report for bank integtration and our client is using payment method "W" Bank Transfer Domestic.
Can anyone let me how we make vendor outgoing payments through bank using the payment method "W" what is the transaction to be used and where we have to give "W".
Thanks!
Z

Zia,
I believe the error is clear enough for you to interpret. You are trying to use a "Bank Transfer" payment method in a transaction that creates "Checks for Payment".
Here's what I suggest:
- if you have to use F-58, your choice of payment method is wrong. "W" is usually domestic transfer, while F-58 woudl rather use "C" or "D" or "E", or a similar method, depending on what is configured in your system for your company code / country
- if, on the other hand, you have to do a "domestic transfer" as suggested by the payment method "W", then your choice of transaction is wrong. Use regular F110 after creating a vendor invoice, and specifying "W" as allowable payment method in the vendor master record.
Trust this helps you to identify the exact problem and resolve it.
Remember to assign points if found useful.
Regards
Gulshan

Down Payment Clearing pushbutton in MIRO (SAP ECC6 EP4)

Dear Experts,
As i am trying to do the same process in my organisation to post the DP in PO at header or item level and after that following the ME2DP process for posting DP and then i do MIGO.
After GR as i do MIRO process and select the PO there is no DOWN PAYMENT Push button on header level on MIRO Screen.
I already re-started the Business Function "LOG_MMFI_P2P" after that also it is not showing the push button.
Please kindly help in this to get that DOWN PAYMENT clearing button?
Regards
Arun Rai

Hi,
I just re activated that module function and process this practise in the similar way SAP has guided in its library which i can tell you in the brief. I suppose that way will work for you.
Posting of Down Payment Clearings and Down Payments in Purchase order
1. Create a purchase order with one or more items. To do this, on the SAP Easy Access screen choose Logistics -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Purchase Order -> Create ->Vendor/Supplying Plant Known (ME21N).
a) In the item details, choose the Invoice tab page. In the Down Payment Category field, choose the Mandatory Down Payment or Voluntary Down Payment setting.
Confirm your entry.
b) Enter an amount in the Down Payment Amount field, or a percentage in the Down Payment % field.
c) Enter a due date in the DP Date field.
d) Save your entries.
2. On the SAP Easy Access screen choose Logistics -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Purchase Order -> Reporting ->Down-Payment Monitoring for PO.
3. In the Purch.Doc. field, enter the purchase order number of the purchase order you just created, and enter the appropriate due date interval.
Choose Execute.
4. Select the purchase order you created in the list and choose Create Down Payment Request.
The Down Payment Based on Purchase Orders screen appears.
5. In the group box Execution, choose either Down Payment or Down Payment Request and then choose Continue.
Depending, either the Down Payment Request screen or the Down Payment screen appears.
6. Change the proposed amount to be paid in the Down Payment Amount field and choose Continue.
7. on the subsequent screens (similar to F-47 / F-48), enter the required data and post the document.
Posting of Down Payment Clearings in Logistics Invoice Verification
Preparation for this process:
1. Create a purchase order with one or more items. To do this, on the SAP Easy Access screen choose Logistics -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Purchase Order -> Create -> Vendor/Supplying Plant Known (ME21N).
2. Use the Financial Accounting transactions (such as F-48) to create down payments for this purchase order.
3. Post a goods receipt with reference to the purchase order you created. To do this, on the SAP Easy Access screen choose Logistics -> Materials Management -> Inventory Management -> Goods Movement -> Goods Movement (MIGO).
Step to follow for Execution
1. Post an invoice with reference to the purchase order you created. To do this, on the SAP Easy Access screen choose Logistics --> Materials Management --> Logistics Invoice Verification --> Document Entry --> Enter Invoice (MIRO).
2. Check the invoice items and correct them if necessary.
3. Choose the Down Payment Clearing pushbutton.
4. In the Amount Entered column, enter all the amounts you want to use to clear the displayed down payments.
Save your entries.
5. Post the invoice.
6. Display the invoice document. To do this, on the SAP Easy Access screen choose Logistics --> Materials Management --> Logistics Invoice Verification --> Further Processing --> Display Invoice Document (MIR4).
i Think the way all the process mention here will help to process your requirement becuase this worked for me and i follow the same way. One think which i like to share with you is i assigned the advance payment at document header level.
Regards
Arun

Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments:CJ88

Hi Experts,
When I settle WBS Element cost to the Asset Under Construction using transaction CJ88, I receive following error.
AA571 Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments.
Please help.
Thank You.

Hi,
first please check if the message AA 571 is right:
- Please check table ANLC. If ANLC-KANZA + ANLC-ANSAZ < 0    AA 571
- Check asset values (AW01N, ANEP, ANLC) and find out where the negative down payments come from (tty 180, 181)
However, in some cases a negative down payment balance cannot be avoided (for example through translation differences in foreign currency areas). This is the problem of AA 571. Sometimes it is not justified. For this
cases we have the following note:
860038 Error AA571 not justified
Using SM30, for the T100S table, create an entry for the message
class AA, message number 571, allowed message type "AEW" and
standard message type "E". Select the entry as 'Switch off'.
If when you post to a fixed asset the down payments are negative, or
become negative through the posting, you continue to receive an error as
a default with these changes.
Recommended procedure:
o Change this message to a warning message for one or several
       special users. This user should then be used to post to any such
       fixed asset that has down payments that are already negative or
       become negative through posting.
o This should only be permitted in the cases where a negative down
       payment balance cannot be avoided due to foreign currency
       rounding.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Feb 11, 2011 9:27 AM

Payment Clearing: Use of Main & Sub Transation on Payment Items.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for