Payment WHT code is appearing in FB60

Hi
I have defined two WHT codes for contractors - one for payment and one for invoice
When i do any F-48 transaction with the vendor to whom both the above WHT codes are only WHT code related to payment is only appearing
But when user does FB60 with the same vendor, user can see both the WHT codes (i.e. invoice and payments) in WHT tab. Hence user need to manually delete payment WHT code in FB60... But problem is that many times user remove invoice WHT code instead of payment WHT. Hence WHT is wrongly deducted.
So is there any way to restrict so that payment WHT code does not appear in FB60.

Hi
The easisest way is not to assign the with holding tax code for payment in vendor master. Just assign the with holding tax type for payment. So in F-48, user will get a pop of with holding tax and in invoice, there will be no deduction on account of With Holding Tax Code for payment.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Similar Messages

Why we should not assign WHT Code for Payment in Vendor Master

HI
I have doubt re WHT. When WHT Types for Invoice and Payment are assigned in Vendor Master, Why Its suggested to maintain WHT Code only for Invoice, why not for Payment. Pls clarify my doubt.
Thanks

Dear
It all depends upon the situation. Sometimes we may pay advance to the vendor. At that time, if we need to deduct tds then we need to incorporate payment tax code in the vendor master. Sometimes we may do either fb60/MIRO and at that time we need to deduct tax then we need to incorporate invoice tax code in the vendor master.
There might be different orders on the same vendor and there might be different areas operating the same vendor for invoice booking/payment. In such situations, we need to maintain both invoice tax code and payment tax code in the vendor master since tds need to be deducted at the time of invoice booking or payment to vendor whichever is earlier.
When first advance payment is made to the vendor and when tds amount is deducted, then at the time of making MIRO we need to remove invoice tax codes so that tds is not deducted twice.
Hope the above clarifies.
Regds

Payment Terms (ZTERM) - Appears in FB60 but not FB70

Hello all,
Currently our system does not show the Payment Terms field in Tcode FB70 (Enter Customer Invoice). There is a requirement to have this field appear.
However, when going to Tcode FB60 (Enter Vendor Invoice), the Payment Terms field appears.
After doing research, I believe I can make this field appear through SAP IMG --> FI Accounting --> FI Accounting Global Settings --> Document --> Line Item --> Controls --> Maintain Field Status Variants (this can be found via Tcode OBC4). When in this Tcode, I'm not sure what Field Status Group controls the parameter to currently supress the Payment Terms field in FB70. I'm also not entirely confident this is the location to make Payment Terms an optional entry field in FB70.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you so much, that is the answer. Payment Terms was not appearing in FB70 because the Field Status Group in the G/L account for the customer was set to a value that suppressed Payment Terms. When the Field Status Group is changed in Tcode FS02 to a value that recognizes Payment Terms as an Optional Entry, the Payment Terms field appears in FB70. Ironically, only one customer had the incorrect value that suppressed the field.

Validation rule for Payment tax code

Hi
I have a requirement in which we have assigned both the invoice and payment with holding tax codes. However, at the time of booking vendor invoice through MIRO/F-43/FB60 , the user has to remove the payment with holding tax code manually. We have written a validation rule in which the prerequisite is that if the t code is F-43/MIRO/FB60 system should check if there is a invoice tax code. If the prerequisite is met and check failed system should give error message. However, our issue is that even after the payment tax code is removed, system is not allowing to save the invoice. The second issue is that the system is also giving an error if there is no tds tax types assigned to the vendor
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Hi
I have set a validation rule with a warning message. System checks for with holding tax code and gives a warning message to the user to remove the payment tax code
regards
Sanil Bhandari

WHT code

Hi,
Please note another issue being faced, in F-53 when we deduct WHT tax , it lets user manually enter WHT code. We want to avoid this. I tried doing with SHDO but couldnt get required result. Help me to sort out issue.
Br

hi
manmaykumar in this case With holding tax is automatically calculated on payment amount which i think not correct.
it is not advisable... Please revert
Mann

1099 misc file format not able to get for multiple WHT code??

Dear Experts,
I am trying to download the file format for 1099 misc IRS reporting for e-filling, i am getting the file for one WHT code 07. but when i am executing this transaction S_P00_07000134 for multiple WHT Code 01 to 14, in the file format, Amount entries are available for all the WHT Code but In the Record "A" only Account code "C" is coming. i have implemented the SAP Note 1666672 version 3 before executing this transaction. Please let me know this is a configuration issue or i am missing to apply other SAP Note. this is very high priority issue now.
Any comments on this are highly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance
Saurabh Saxena

I am seeing the same issue. This worked for us last year. But this year the A Record indicates that we only have Withholding code 7, yet our detail records have withholding amounts in columns 1, 6, and 7.
IRS rules state that multiple withholding codes should be concatenated in ascending order in the Header 'A'Record. This must be an issue with the 2011 DMEE file, IDWTFILE_US_1099.xml as this is the only thing that changed in the 2011 note.
Actually, I've just compared last year's IDWTFILE_US_1099.xml file with this year's, and in the part of the transformation where the withholding amount codes are concatenated, it appears a bug was introduced. I'm going to hand-edit my copy of the file to see if it resolves the issue, and I'll cross my fingers that SAP produces a 4th update to note 1666672
Edited by: Timothy Conama on Jan 19, 2012 1:45 AM

WHT amount not appearing in FBL1N report for Document type RE

Dear Friends,
While running FBL1N report for any vendor where TDS is applicable, the WHT amount is appearing for KR document type. But when it is RE document type the WHT amount is not appearing in the report. How can we resolve this? Any enhancement/any note to be applied?
Regards,
Ramkumar

Hi,
FBL1N is having the classic withholding tax field hence please don't refer the those fields.
please don't refer those fields.
Please review attached note 363309 for detailed explanation.
BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And
extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table
WITH_ITEM.
You can check in table BSEG for the fields and will find that system
do NOT update field BSEG-QBSHB.
In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actully the field
of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows
zero in line item display.
And as note 363309 says,
"Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
from your display variant.
If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'."
Regards
Madhu M
Edited by: M Madhu on Jan 18, 2012 9:13 AM

Hi, I want to purchase the complete creative cloud at S$60 , however, in my account, at the payment page, it's appear RM currency and the selection of country does not include singapore. How am I suppose to purchase?

Hi, I want to purchase the complete creative cloud at S$60 , however, in my account, at the payment page, it's appear RM currency and the selection of country does not include singapore. How am I suppose to purchase?

Hi there,
The country selected while creating the Adobe account was selected as Malaysia, so you get to see the price in RM.
^Ani

WHT Code with Tax Slabs

Dear All,
I need to configure a tax code in the system as per following three conditions:
No..Condition...................................... .Rate
1...Gross Amount (GA) <= 150,000........0%
2...GA > 150,000 and GA < 400,000.......5%
3...GA > 400,000 and GA < 1,000,000...12,500 + 10%
I have seen formulas section in the WHT Code Configuration in SPRO but there is no way to define this constant amount of 12,500.
Please provide a suggestion how to add this amount to the calculated tax amount?
Regards,
Anosh

I buy your point.
I will create WHT Type for WHT Code - Individual and WHT Code - Others.
But still there will be an issue since WHT Code will be different Non PAN and With PAN (within Individual). So still this will be an issue.
How to control this now.
=
Meena

Bapi is used to 'post incoming payments (t-code F-28)'

hi all
can any one tell which bapi is used to 'post incoming payments (t-code F-28)'.
thanks in advance,
lokesh

Hi
Try 'BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_POST' and fill the parameters correctly.Contact ur functional to fill it correctly.
That will work.
If helpful give me points.
Regards
Manas Ranjan Panda

Problem with payment block code in MIRO

Hi experts,
I've a problem during invoice verification, the system doesn't set the payment block code R -Invoice verification but another payment block code and in this way the transaction MRBR doesn't show the invoice blocked.
Is there in customizing an option for setting a specify payment code block for a company code?
I've verified the OMR6 and OMR9, but the problem not solved.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Gaetano

You can Block the invoice by
1. By defining the Block in payment terms
2. By setting tolerance limits in OMR6 trxn
3. and using Stochostic Block

TS1702 I have tried to submit a dissatisfaction report following your instructions from my invoice for the recent purchase of smart office 2. I can get no further as a report code keeps appearing saying too many http redirects so I can not get any furthe

I have tried to submit a dissatisfaction report following your instructions from my invoice for the recent purchase of smart office 2. I can get no further as a report code keeps appearing saying too many http redirects so I can not get any further.
I have also sent 3 emails to the company if Smart Office 2 with no response.
How do I report my dissatisfaction which is growing with the frustration of not being able to contact any one!
Zena Parton

I have tried to submit a dissatisfaction report following your instructions from my invoice for the recent purchase of smart office 2. I can get no further as a report code keeps appearing saying too many http redirects so I can not get any further.
I have also sent 3 emails to the company if Smart Office 2 with no response.
How do I report my dissatisfaction which is growing with the frustration of not being able to contact any one!
Zena Parton

Multiple WHT code in one invoice

Dear SAP gurus,
We have a scenario where in one PO there are multiple lines in which each line is having its own witholding tax code. During MIRO, the wihtolding tax code that is pulled is coming from vendor, thus there is one code applicable for all lines in the invoice to the same PO.
Is it possible that in invoice that is reffering to multiple lines in one PO is having a unique WHT code per line in the invoice?
Please help.
Best regards,
John.

Dear Raju,
You may have different Bill-to-Parties and Payers, in a single Sales Order, at Item level (for different Line-Items);
BUT
You may not have multiple Bill-to-Parties and Payers, for a single line-item, for a Particular Sales Order Line-Item.
Best Regards,
Amit,
Note: Haven't experienced, but might be achieved the requirement with Customization (not sure).

Problem updating phone code 3014 appears how can I esolve it?

i deleted all setting and donner of my iphone when he restart her self the apple still bloked and he didind boot i try to update but many error problem updating phone code 3014 appears how can I esolve it? and now he still always in recovery mod what can i do ;;;;(

Dissable wifi sync and then try the update again.
Should all be sorted then,
Ryan

I used to use SpeedBit Video Downloader with Mozilla Firefox, but suddenly a problem happened, I can not download with it now at all as there is an code error appears in the bar of SpeedBit like "XML Parsing Error: unclosed token Location: chrome://browse

I used to use SpeedBit Video Downloader with Mozilla Firefox, but suddenly a problem happened, I can not download with it now at all as there is an code error appears in the bar of SpeedBit like "XML Parsing Error: unclosed token Location: chrome://browser/content/browser.xul Line Number 1, column 8702:....................."
I did evrey thing, but the same problem
reinstall SpeedBit, reinstall Mozilla Firefox.
So what can I do!
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== 4 days ago

look people, i may have a solution for this. This happened to me a few times before and resolved alone, but last time it happened was when i turned off my router and back on while my comp was running and appeared when i tried opening firefox after that. so wat i did was i shutdown the computer and the router and tried turning both on again, and it resolved.
Therefore, Summary: Shutdown computer then turnoff router then turn both back on
Hope this helps anyone.

Payment WHT code is appearing in FB60

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for