WHT amount not appearing in FBL1N report for Document type RE

Dear Friends,
While running FBL1N report for any vendor where TDS is applicable, the WHT amount is appearing for KR document type. But when it is RE document type the WHT amount is not appearing in the report. How can we resolve this? Any enhancement/any note to be applied?
Regards,
Ramkumar

Hi,
FBL1N is having the classic withholding tax field hence please don't refer the those fields.
please don't refer those fields.
Please review attached note 363309 for detailed explanation.
BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And
extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table
WITH_ITEM.
You can check in table BSEG for the fields and will find that system
do NOT update field BSEG-QBSHB.
In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actully the field
of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows
zero in line item display.
And as note 363309 says,
"Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
from your display variant.
If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'."
Regards
Madhu M
Edited by: M Madhu on Jan 18, 2012 9:13 AM

Similar Messages

  • In fbl1n report for document type RE  withholding tax amount is not showing

    in fbl1n report for document type RE  withholding tax amount is not showing
    in sap note 363309 determines
    Solution
    Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information (field BSEG-QSSHB) from your display
    variant.
    If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on the document number and
    subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'.
    my doubt is we remove the field BSEG-QSSHB in layout how can show the withholding tax amount in FBLIN report
    how to remove from the layout
    please clarefy
    bhayyapu   

    Hi,
    If you want to check amounts of withholding tax for the vendors, you have some options to view it. You can access the WITH_ITEM, LFC1 tables by SE16. You have too the S_P00_07000134 report. This report is developed for the Colombia but I already used for the another country with the ABAP development for this country.
    Also you can use table join BSIK and WITH_ITEM by SQVI for the open items and BSAK and WITH_ITEM for cleared items. It is more simple and fast.
    JPA

  • Lead time values are not appearing in the report for current year.

    Hi friends,
    Iam checking a report in production.  where lead time values are displayed as 0 for 1 key figure lead time3 (w/0 dim) . i found there is a formula for this it shows like NODIM ( 'Lead Time 3' ).and there is a value for cal.lead time
    how can i get values in the report.
    Thanks ,
    VRV.

    Hi,
    Although your question is not clear, I understood that the formula built on that KF is NODIM. Basically it means, units of measurement is not considered when calculating.
    Eg: 5 Minutes + 5 Kilograms = 10
    You please try to analyze your KF by the above logic. Then you would be able to figure out why the data is not appearing in the report..
    Assign if helps...
    Regards,
    Suman

  • Full data is not being display in report for "LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_EXTENDED_Text" type field

    Hi
    I have extended Opportunity BO with a field type LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_EXTENDED_Text", then I have enhanced my datasource and report.
    for this field I have entered value almost 100 characters but in report only 60 character is being shown.
    Could anyone help me how to bring whole value in report as it is in database.
    Thanks
    Sunil Maurya

    Hi Sunil,
    As per your requirement in reports only display 60 characters.
    We have similar requirement to display more than 1000 character in report but this is not possible in report
    Please check this discussion :
    Add 'notes'-field in report
    Regards,
    Mithun

  • DA amount not appearing in infotype 008 & in Remuneration Statement

    I am learning Payroll-India on IDES 6.0. I have configured Dearness Allowance using "Incremental CPI slab based Calculation" method (not yet sure how I did it! will try to figure out!). I executed the "DA Report" for a personnel number and the VDA amount is computed there (it shows Rs. 1200). After this I used the "Start Payroll" to run the payroll for the personnel number. But the VDA amount is not appearing in Infotype 0008 for the personnel number. However, the text for the VDA wage type "Variable DA") is appearing. In the remuneration statement, neither the wage type text nor the amount is appearing ( I have done the necessary configuration to include the wage type in window W1).
    Please guide me on what could be going wrong.

    Hi,
    Now the VDA amount is appearing in infotype 0008 of the personnel number. I ran the DA batch program for the personnel number and then uploaded using sm35.
    After this, I started the payroll run for this personnel number, which was successful. But in the Remuneration Statement, neither the VDA text nor the VDA amount is appearing (I have done the necessary creation & transfer of the VDA wage type in Remuneration Statement).
    Please guide me.
    I have a related query. For the VDA wage type, I have set INVAL B in the wage type characteristics. Is it okay? If so, how should I create the entries for VDA wage type in the screen "Maintain Valuation of Base Wage Types" & in the screen "Calculate Eligibility for RAP's"?

  • Report for wage type with number, amount and amount per unit?

    Hi friends.
    I would like to know if there exits a report for wage type (like the PC00_M99_CWTR) that shows the number (anzhl), amount per unit (betpe) and the amount (betrg) of a person for a specific wage type.
    The standar report PC00_M99_CWTR does not display the amount per unit (betpe).
    Thanks in advance.
    Albio.-
    Edited by: Albio Manuel Vivas on Oct 20, 2011 6:13 PM

    Thanks,
    could you tell me what transaction i'll should use?
    thanks in advance
    Albio.-

  • Amount not appearing in the PO history of me23

    Hi,
    For one of the PO,after doing 105,when I tried see value amount in PO history tab of me23(PO screen),it is showing only 0.00.
    It is a project PO.Account assignment category 'P'. I want to know why this amount not appearing in PO history.
    Any help to solve this issue,please...
    With Regards,
    Jaheer

    Hi,
    if the accounting doc is not generated then plz check the value update of material type
    check code OMS2
    here select the material type ur using then click on Quantity/value updating
    tick for value update
    Any one of the below mentioned case is yours, then it is quite possible that amount value will not be reflecting.
    1. Does your PO contains non-valuated Materials ?
    2. check you might have created the PO for Free-of-charge Items?
    3. if it is CG PO and involves multiple account assignments, then Valuation occurs at Invoice level.

  • Iphone 5 I do not go out or do not appear in upgrede AirPlay for ios 7.0.4 safari browser is not smooth and too long kept out the phrase "safari can not search for too many repetitions search"

    iphone 5 I do not go out or do not appear in upgrede AirPlay for ios 7.0.4 safari browser is not smooth and too long kept out the phrase "safari can not search for too many repetitions search"

    AphexTwin wrote:
    - no Apple input?
    Of course not.  Didn't you bother to read the TOU of this forum?  This is a USER TO USER technical support forum.  Apple doesn't post here.

  • SAP Note 1614681 - ESI monthly report for filing details of ESIable employe

    Any one implemented this SAP Note
    While doing the manual steps mentioned in SAP Note 1614681 - ESI monthly report for filing details of ESIable employees .
    we found some difficulties.
    Please let me know the steps that you followed while implementing this.
    Note Summary
    Symptom
    As per the new rule introduced by ESIC authorities, an organization is liable to file details of employees eligible for ESI contribution during a particular period/month. Details are to be uploaded on the ESIC website in the format prescribed by the ESIC authorities. Currently, as a part of SAP standard delivery, ESI Form5 and Form6 are provided which are used to report ESI contribution for a period of six months. However, there is no such provision to generate monthly ESI details in system and report it to the ESIC authorities.
    Other terms
    HINCESI0, PC00_M40_ESIF, ESI , Employee State Insurance, ESI Monthly report, IT0588, ESIC.
    Reason and Prerequisites
    Legal Change.

    Hi,
         We tried to apply the manual steps mentioned along with the note. We were able to do first two steps that is inserting the messages in message class and creating new text elements..
    When we tried for the 3rd step, we are facing the problem..
    When we gave the name ''HR_IN_ESI_MON_DET '' in SE18 and and try to create it asked for the package...since it is SAP standard we gave PC40( since all ESI badi is saved in this package i gave this) for the package name.....and it got created and each time it was asking for Access key...( After providing access key in each step it got created)
    Now when i check in SE80 this enhancement is there....but if i check in SE18 it says Enhancement spot doesn't exist.  
    check the screen shot:
    http://www.mypicx.com/10052011/ESI_manual_Steps/

  • REPORT FOR INFO TYPE 586

    Hi All
    I am trying to create a report for INFO TYPE 586  in HR ABAP,where  in a table apporx 30 investment codes , proposed investment and actual amount are apperaring .
    Now My problem is,  I do not want to use IF .... ENDIF statment. Is there any other way to write the code .
    Please Help.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    In this situation you can use field-symbols and/or a internal table. Like this:
    tables: pa0586.
    field-symbols: <ff1> type any,
                   <ff2> type any,
                   <ff3> type any.
    data: w_campo1(30),
          w_campo2(30),
          w_campo3(30),
    data: w_nx(2) type n.
    data: begin of i_myitc occurs,
            itc like pa0586-itc01,
            dsc(30),
          end of i_myitc.
    * fixed selection or may be from a z table
    i_myitc-itc = '01'. i_myitc-dsc = 'AAAAA'. append i_myitc.
    i_myitc-itc = '02'. i_myitc-dsc = 'BBBBB'. append i_myitc.
    i_myitc-itc = '03'. i_myitc-dsc = 'CCCCC'. append i_myitc.
    select single * from pa0586.
    do 30 times.
       w_nx = sy-index.
       concatenate 'PA0586-ITC' w_nx into w_campo1.
       concatenate 'PA0586-PIN' w_nx into w_campo2.
       concatenate 'PA0586-AIN' w_nx into w_campo3.
       assign (w_campo1) to <ff1>.
       assign (w_campo2) to <ff2>.
       assign (w_campo3) to <ff3>.
       read table i_myitc with key itc = <ff1>.
       write: / <ff1>, <ff2>, <ff3>, i_myitc-dsc.
    enddo.
    Best regards,
    Leandro Mengue

  • Error M8-688 - Creation of several vendor line items is not possible for document type RN.

    Hello All,
    We are using the Net Invoice Posting with document type RN(Invoice- Net). We are generating different vendor line items in the accounting document based on the withholding tax codes involved in the invoice posting. When it comes to net invoice posting system is giving an error message M8-688 - Creation of vendor line items is not possible for document type RN. Is there is any way to create multiple vendor items with net invoice posting? Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Chandu.

    I dont think that there is any way because it is a hardcoded error message.
          IF NOT t003-xnetb IS INITIAL.
            MESSAGE e688 WITH pi_rbkpv-blart.
          ENDIF.
    SAP is checking the customizing for net/gross posting per document type in table T003
    And if it is set up as net, then it is a hard error.

  • Down Payments Error: Account type K is not defined for document type DZ T

    I am getting the error message: Transaction code: F-29
    Account type K is not defined for document type DZ
         Message no. F5243
    In this case i am trying to post a customer down payment in t.code:  F-29.
    In the document type DZ in OBA7 we tick only G.L and Customer tab as this is not a vendor document.
    Also the settings in T. Code : OBXR where we maintain configuration for customers has been maintained with a special G/L reconciliation account.
    any help will be really appreciated,
    Regards
    Satish

    I have checked all the settings
    OBXR for Customer Down Payments. It is with indicator A and a Special G/L Account has been configured.
    The special G.L Account is of the Recon account type Customers with FSG as Recon accounts
    The document type DZ in OBA7 is ticked for G.L and Customer and this is how i think it should be as i am not paying a vendor downpayment
    but it still gives me the same error.
    Regards
    Satish

  • Error:Account type D is not defined for document type RE

    Hi! I encountered this error msg: "Account type D is not defined for document type RE"  while posting IR in mir6.  What does this error msg mean? Thanks!

    hi,
    RE stands for Gross postings...
    When you block the document for payments...its never possible to the post the payments for such documents...
    The invoice seems to get posted, but is internally blocked for payment and later you need to delete the payment block indicator and process the invoice further for payments...
    check OMBA as well for the settings...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Account type D is not defined for document type RE - Credit Memo

    I tried to key in credit memo of fixed asset at MIRO but prompt out this errors "Account type D is not defined for document type RE". I checked OMBA - account type for vendor is selected. Any advise to resolve this problem?

    Hi Sanil,
    It is just a debit Vendor and Cerdit Fixed Asset. Is anything wrong here?

  • Error - Account type D is not defined for document type WL

    I am getting error while doing PGI (Post Goods Issue).
    Error - Account type D is not defined for document type WL

    As we had the same problem for a document in our system, I was also browsing for the answer. I saw this thread and now we have found the solution, so could not resist sharing, although it is an old posting.
    In these cases it can be that a user wants to create a purchase order of the type UB. But if you have stock transport between two companies, you should not use this order type. You have to use order type NB.
    If the user creates the PO with NB then probably they will not get the message.

Maybe you are looking for