PCA Retraction - Missing FM in R/3

Hi All,
I want to utilize the PCA retraction programs UPR_PCA_PLAN_EXEC and UPR_PCA_PLAN_INIT. However there is a piece missing on the R/3 side. Function module 'ZPCA_POST_RFC_PLANDATA_ACCOUNT' is called by UPR_PCA_PLAN_EXEC.
Does anyone have the code etc for this FM????
Thanks,
Mike.

There is blogs in the blog area where retraction is explained in detail for CCA. They might be useful also for your PCA issue.
Follow these links
/people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/07/01/bps-retraction-for-cost-center-accounting--i
/people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/07/11/bps-retraction-for-cost-center-accounting--ii-primary-cost-qty
/people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/07/17/bps-retraction-for-cost-center-accounting--iii-activities-prices
Hope this helps.
Regards, Aki

Similar Messages

CCA and PCA retraction in Integrated Planning

Hi all,
Please I need some orientation about CCA an PCA retraction when you are using Integrated planning.
I read blogs about CCA retraction (made by Praveen Mayalur) and was very helpfull, but it only refers a planning scenario using BW-BPS, and I don't have the same structure to send the data in the integrated planning.
I had looked in SDN and SAP portal, and I can't find anything about it.
I hope you can help me.
Thanks in advance, best regards
Inge Eichhorns

Hi
1) Retraction are driven by BPS, IP is not equipped with Retraction.
2) Cost Center & Internal Order Retraction should be configured through in BPS--> Planning Area; Planning Level, Planning Function; Parameter Group.
3) You need to configure Source Structure, based on business requirement you need to ensure that the retraction happens either in CO Currency or Transaction Currency.
4) Try to use the SAP Standard Function Modules for Cost Center and Internal Order Retraction. Refrain from copying & modifying the same.
go through the Cost Center Retraction relevant documents and they are very helpful.
5) Function Modules for Profit Center Retraction are not available in ECC due to the New GL Concept.
6) If possible advise the Business to use "File Upload" for Profit Center Data.
Regards
Srinivas

PCA doment missing during the delta extraction

Hi R/3 DBA experts,
We are using Oracle 10g Data base for our ECC6.0 R/3 system.During BW extraction some of the PCA line item records got missed which gets update in data base table GLPCA in R/3 after successful document creation.
We are in the process of analysis to find out the root cause of the issue as we are approaching year end close.
Please let me know how to get the following logs(Information) in R/3
1.Total time taken in Application server for a particular document which was Entered.
2.Total time taken for a document from posting(Document entry) to successful data base server update.
(OR Application server to Data base server update log details OR Document posting to DB write for a document)
Please treat this as a matter of urgency
Regards
Kumar

Hi,
To move the data from Update Tables to Delta Queue, u need to run the V3 Job Control in LBWE. Once if the job is successfully completed then all the data from Update tables are moved to Delta Queue. Check once in the job overview of V3 job control is there any errors.
Hope this helps in solving u r problem
Regards
Ramakrishna Kamurthy

PCA Retractor-Do we have Standard? Or do we need some customization

Hi,
We are planning to do PCA retraction.I am an ABAPER and novice to BW .
Pls share your experiences and recommendations.
Rgds
Praveen

follow these links. There are some good blogs and information here :
/people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/08/24/how-to-retract-bps-data-back-to-r3-when-there-is-no-standard-retractor
/people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/07/01/bps-retraction-for-cost-center-accounting--i
/people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/07/11/bps-retraction-for-cost-center-accounting--ii-primary-cost-qty
/people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/07/17/bps-retraction-for-cost-center-accounting--iii-activities-prices

Upgrade Solaris 9 8/03 to latest Update

Hi,
I have a Sun-Fire-V-250 server with Solaris 9 8/03 s9s_u4wos_08a SPARC OS/release installed. I want to setup Oracle 11g into this box, for which Solaris 9 Update 6 is mandatory.
I'm pretty new to Solaris patches and updates.
Can you please guide me in finding the latest update/patch for Solaris 9 and also provide references (step-by-step guide) for installing the patch/update.
Thanks in advance.

I recommend the not-from-sun-but-better-than-sun-tools pca
http://www.par.univie.ac.at/solaris/pca/
where after install you could/should try "pca --download missing", wait a while, then later, in single user, "pca --install missing". Be prepared to have you sun account details/password to hand, and read the docs at the above site for info on how to use the tool.
Sun also has a complete recommended patch collection for download at sunsolve.sun.com, which is a big zip file - you download it, unzip it, cd into it, and run ./install_cluster.
In both cases be prepared to wait a while for all patches to be applied.
Kevin

Integrated Planning - Retraction to R/3 from BI 7.0 (CCA & PCA)

Dear collegues,
Actually, I have to do some retraction for integrated planning of CCA and PCA (two projects for the same customer).
The integrated planning works allredy very well. Now I have to retract the plannig data back to the R/3 (NW 2004 - System). I have allready read the very interesting blogs of Praveen, but i am not able to rebuild it on my system. For example the dictionary structures /1SEM/_YS_CHASE_ are missing on my systems. On the other hand, I am not sure, on which system I have to build up the retraction (on the R/3 or on the BI 7.0).
Are there any trapdoor, I have to avoid in my project?
Has anybody further information, how to setup a retraction in case of cca or pca with BI 7.0?
I would be very happy, if someone could post an actual blog for retraction with R/3 and BI 7.0...
greetings,
Björn Dahlschen

Hi ,
IP does not have retraction capabilities like BPS.
However you would have to utilize the BPS0 framework for the retraction piece.
Since you mentioned that you have input queries ready so I assume you have the transactional infocube ready.You dont have to copy the infocube to anything....
Please create an planning area attached the transaction infocube that you already created.
Create the planning level for CCA usually cost center , cost element , period amount etc.
Create the planning function - This is the retraction exit.
Create the structures in UPB_STRUCT for retraction as well.
Let me know if this was helpful.
Tx,
Madhu

Cost Element missing in FAGLFLEXT for some PCA Plan records

Hi Gurus,
We have uploaded a PCA plan and can see the same in GP12NA. I see the planned values (GLPL) in FAGLFLEXT from SE16 under the correct accounts for 0L ledger for the correct company code and the fiscal year. I noticed a difference in the data
1) For the revenue elements (11 and 12 Categories) the 'cost element' field is not getting populated in FAGLFLEXT. ('Account' is populated.) Is it expected?
2) We have a Z library report that was built on FAGLFLEXT. The report uses the cost element groups to pull in the data and hence the 'Actual Values' are pulled in the report but the 'Plan Values' are missing. (Because of point1)
Any pointers on how to fix this?Could you please suggest the places i would need to look to fix this?
(I've checked that the plan vesion is activated for 2011)
(The report has version Z2 as one of its parameters.)
Regards,
Erp.Warrior

Thanks a lot for your replies.
Waman: I've looked up the Note 983835 - NewGL planning: Cost element field (COST_ELEM) initial.
This note talks about the Cost element not getting populated during planning. My question / confusion is in my case, the cost element is getting populated for some of them and not getting populated only for cost elem category 11 and 12.
Is this note intended for this issue?
Ajay: I've tried re-planning and still found the same issue. Thanks for your inputs. I'll analyse about the Note that waman has referred to and then may be go to SAP as suggested by you.
Please let me know if any of you have any other suggestions as well.
Thanks
erp.warrior

ML documents missing in PCA

Hi,
For few ML document types are missing in PCA . FI entries are correct, however in GL line item report in coumn Amt loc.curr.2 is not matching with column LC amnt. material ledger is active. Due to this MAP (per unit price) is not matching for company code currency and PCA valuation.
Document type- ML
automatic Text-
VNPRD: Offset against single-level price diff.
EBPRV: Write off multi-level price differences
ZUPRV: Price differences from previous levels
Thanks,
Dinabandhu.

Hello Expert,
Any idea how to fix this issue.
Thanks,
Dinabandhu.

Missing PCA document in BW during delta extraction of 0EC_PCA_3

Hi experts,
We are using Oracle 10g Data base for our ECC6.0 R/3 system.During BW extraction some of the PCA line item records got missed which gets update in data base table GLPCA in R/3 after successful document creation.
We are in the process of analysis to find out the root cause of the issue as we are approaching year end close.
Please let me know how to get the following logs(Information) in R/3
1.Total time taken in Application server for a particular document which was Entered.
2.Total time taken for a document from posting(Document entry) to successful data base server update.
(OR Application server to Data base server update log details OR Document posting to DB write for a document)
Please treat this as a matter of urgency
Regards
Kumar

I thought payment run is only for AP and AR documents.Is Payment run applicable for PCA journal also?
true the AP and AR postings will come in the PRC4 load in 0EC_PC_1.
But the other side of the AP and the AR is bank which is posted directly to 0EC_PCA_3.
Go to the AP posting for the payment - then document overview and you will see the balance sheetposting for the bank
In th emenu accoutning documents somewhere is the link to the PCA document - you can check there
The sm13 errors naturalyl wont excist as they have been processed
This is goign to be a nightmare to try and prove - I gave up trying to do this when I lost some data once
Yes GLPCA is the line item table that 0EC_PCA_3 reads
0EC_PCA_1 in full mode reads GLPCT but 0EC_PCA_1 in delta mode - actually creates a proper RSA7 delta queue for GLPCA but summarises into a GLPCT structure(!!! yeah I know!)
My only requirement is GLPCT data - I currently run this every hour based on the delta queue and also I have a real time read for up to the second reads for importatn queries

Parameters in retraction to PCA

Hi!
I am tring to create a planning function to retract planning data from SEM-BPS to profit center accounting in R/3. I have the name of the needed function modules (UPR_PCA_PLAN_EXEC, UPR_PCA_PLAN_INIT) but I don't know which parameters should I assign to data elements under Parameter Exit Functions.
I noticed that UPR_COST_PLAN_INIT tells them in the beginning of the function module, but UPR_PCA_PLAN_INIT doesn't. I didn't find any threads nore notes concerning this issue. Could anybody help me?
Should I define a sender and a recipient structure in BW and in R/3? Or is this retraction even possible without remote consulting?
I would be grateful for an answer
Sari

Thank you Mary,
I didn't find Mark's blog, but I found a blog written by Praveen Mayalur <a href="/people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/08/24/how-to-retract-bps-data-back-to-r3-when-there-is-no-standard-retractor:///people/praveen.mayalur/blog/2006/08/24/how-to-retract-bps-data-back-to-r3-when-there-is-no-standard-retractor. Let's see if it helps!
The other possibility is to try to retract the data to cost center accounting, since the profit centers are 1:1 relationship to cost centers and then copy the planning data in R/3 to profit center accounting. The question will be, in that case, am I able to map the data in profit center cube to cost center tables in R/3.
Sari

Data in ODS are missing

Hi All,
I am working on 0FI_GL_10 DS. i am loading data from DS>DSO>CUBE.
I am loading data for 2007 as well as 2008. for some of the G/L Account the values are coming only for 2007.EX. there are 16 posting period in 2007 so data for the field 0DEBIT , 0CREDIT, and 0BALANCE are coming for 2007 but it is not carryforwarding the last period balance to the 2008001 and data comes from the fifth posting period means data comes for 2008006.
why data is missing in ODS for first four posting period while it is coming perfactly in PSA and it happens with many G/L Accounts.
Regards,
Komik Shah

No - the figures in the DSO shoudl be deltas
Then in the start routine for the cube shoudl generate the periods in the future for the next year (as per the PCA cubes start routine)
SO the DSO contains - for example:
Period 5 2008   EUR 100
After the start routine in the cube has generated the entries you will see
Period 5 2008   EUR 100
Period 6 2008   EUR 100
Period 7 2008   EUR 100
Period 8 2008   EUR 100
Period 9 2008   EUR 100
Period 16 2008   EUR 100
Then when you get a movement in period 7 in the DSO you will then see this in the DSO
Period 5 2008   EUR 100
Period 7 2008   EUR 300
After that you will see this in the cube
Period 5 2008   EUR 100
Period 6 2008   EUR 100
Period 7 2008   EUR 100
Period 7 2008   EUR 300
Period 8 2008   EUR 100
Period 8 2008   EUR 300
Period 9 2008   EUR 100
Period 9 2008   EUR 300
Period 16 2008   EUR 100
Period 16 2008   EUR 300
And after compression!
Period 5 2008   EUR 100
Period 6 2008   EUR 100
Period 7 2008   EUR 400
Period 8 2008   EUR 400
Period 9 2008   EUR 400
Period 16 2008   EUR 400
But you need to get the keys to the DSO correct!!

Material and representative material in PCA

Hello all,
I have an issue concerning material numbers in Profit Center Accounting. My aim is to be able to report on material group (attribute on 0MATERIAL) in BW for both plan and actuals.
In R/3 PCA they plan on field "representative material". Furthermore they post actuals on "material" field.
Extractor 0EC_PCA_1 brings all postings (plan + actuals) to BW, but does not include the "material" field. It only includes the "representative material" field, so I'm missing the possiblity to see the actuals per material number.
Extractor 0EC_PCA_3 brings all actual postings to BW and includes the "material number". However the representative field is not filled (since this is only actuals)
So I get what I need into BW, but in two different extractors (and also on two different aggregation levels).
I somehow need to merge the information of these two extractors. Is it a multi cube I should use here? Or should I rather try to modify 0EC_PCA_1 by adding the material number in an append structure? I actually tried this, but I still couldn't find the new field in the extractor. So I guess this is not possible here and that I have to go for the multi cube solution?
I need to get both the "representative material" and the "material" into info object "0MATERIAL" since the material group is an attribute of that. Could this work if I modify the update rules in cube 0PCA_C01 (this is filled with records from 0EC_PCA_1) so that repr. material points at 0MATERIAL (for plan values) and at the same time use cube 0PCA_C03 (this is filled with records from 0EC_PCA_3) which uses 0MATERIAL as standard (for the actuals).
I'd be extremely thankful for some ideas/help...
Thanks in advance!
best regards,
Fredrik

Hi Fredrik,
Some questions:
Is there a 1 on 1 relation between repr. mat. and material?
Do you have PCA_1 as Totals or Line Items?
If you want to report on material group you somewhere have to have a relation between repr. material and mat. group.
Of course you can always map the rep. into 0MATERIAL, but you MD has to be correct too.
And: Adding in PCA extractors is difficult!

Posting to Production Order Field during WIP Calc in Classic Ledger FI/PCA

During our weekly Work In Process Calculation job (SAP Transaction KKAO) the following journal entry posts correctly per our company's SAP configuration:
Debit/Credit Work In Process Change (Income Statement)
Debit/Credit Work in Process Inventory (Balance Sheet)
When the entry posts in the Financial Accounting and Profit Center Accounting Modules within the Classic Ledger, the Order field (BSEG-AUFNR, GLPCA-AUFNR) is not being populated with the Production Order number. Instead it is going into a Text field. An example of the current behavior is below.
Itm PK Account    Account short text   Amount Text
1 40 530000     WIP Change                9.59 ORD 12345678
2 50 132000     WORK IN PROCESS    9.59- ORD 12345678
The other Production Order transactions such as labor confirmations and finished good deliveries populate the aforementioned Order fields and have no Text entry.
I would like the WIP calculation transaction to populate the Order fields in the Financial Accounting and Profit Center Accounting Postings. How can I make this happen within the SAP configuration?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Roman

Hi,
old PCA report painter reports can be migrated to NewGL reports under certain circumstances (see SAPNET note 1555535 for details).
As the NewGL PC reporting bases on the data available in the new GL tables FAGLFLEX* I think that you will miss some infos in NewGL PC reporting compared to infos available in classic PCA reporting (eg object type / object class).
Nevertheless it is possible to add fields toFAGLFLEX* but I doubt that this will be helpful in your case.
BR Christian

Why is it (and how is it possible) that you guys don't have any retractable magsafe power cords (or at least an accessory that would turn normal magsafe chargers into a retractable unit)? (Or do you?)

Way, way back it was cool that you could wrap the smaller cord around those retractable clips. However, even that has grown annoying.
For those of us who use the longer attachment (for which there isn't even a wrapping solution) dealing with the cords is time consuming (and basically impossible to do in such a way that it can withstand any real traveling).
At least one of the reasons there is no retractable cord option is that other companies can't design one themselves without violating your intellectual property rights. That said, Apple should really be the ones to tackle this particular cord-annoyance (all the groundwork for the design has already been done for you guys--all you'd have to do is tweak it to fit the specifics of your magsafe cords, and *voila*, fantastically manageable, clean, well-designed, and highly portable power cord for us all.
Suddenly: champagne would fall from the heavens, doors would open, velvet ropes would part, world peace, end to hunger....you get the idea.
It seems like this is the only place to give suggestions for things such as this...am I missing something?

Welcome Jessie!
Here's how to get your comment to someone working in Apple product development:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/macbookpro.html
That said, Apple shipped retractable cord chargers in the early PowerBook days. From talking to people who owned them, I get the impression that the constant in/out action caused many to fail prematurely. I suspect Apple abandoned them for a reason.

Quantity field not getting update in PCA document for Goods Receipt

We have the Purchase Account activated for our company code.
For movement type 101 (Goods Receipt), I am getting the quantity field updated for GR/IR account and Stock Account (B/S item).
But the quantity field is not getting updated for the "Purchase Account" and the "other offsetting PL A/C).
Please advice whether I am missing something.
Regards
B.Mohanty

Hi Aravind,
Check SAP notes 1063198 and 1117587.
FAGLL03 display quantity which is updated in FAGLFLEXA, BSEG is not
relevant in this case. This is clearly explained in the note 1063198.
The quantity posts through to FI on the 'goods receipt' items, but not on the
'invoice receipt' items.
In the FI normally the Quantity is not a 'real' important field, as it
is more related to the MM area.
But in the old 'Profit Center Accounting' and the old' Special Ledger'
the field has been important.
As the same logic of these areas to 'store' the Quantity is also used
in the NewG/L the field get only filled in the line, where it make
'sense' from our point of view, because only in the 'goods receipt'
lines a 'real' Quantity is posted to the system.
So as before in the PCA and SL, now also in the NewG/L the Quantity is
filled in the correct and important lines and postings.
In the BSEG ('old document segment table') the field is filled 'just'
as it is send to the FI, but this is not completely correct from the
business point of view.
This can also lead to issues with the reporting and summation to this
field. So with creating the new logic in the NewG/L the 'correct'
standard of the 'writing' for the Quantity has also been taken over.
So in the end, the update and display is correct according SAP standard behavior.
Actually,Quantities within G/L are never reliable,
because the purpose of FI is a view on the data according to amount
but not according to quantity.
In the FI normally the Quantity is not a 'real' important field, as it
is more related to the MM area.
I hope I could be of assistance.
Regards,
Fernando

PCA Retraction - Missing FM in R/3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for