Performanc issue

hey to all
i have face a problem regarding performance ADDM report show problem with tempoary tablespace. loading of data take double time. what can i do whereas loading of data is running
*Action Consider increasing the throughput of the I/O subsystem. Oracle's recommended solution is to stripe all data file using the SAME methodology. You might also need to increase the number of disks for better performance. Alternatively, consider using Oracle's Automatic Storage Management solution.
Rationale During the analysis period, the average data files' I/O throughput was 8 M per second for reads and 2.9 M per second for writes. The average response time for single block reads was 3.2 milliseconds*
Action The performance of file F:\APP\ZAFAR\ORADATA\ORCL\TEMP09.DBF was significantly worse than other files. If striping all files using the SAME methodology is not possible, consider striping this file over multiple disks.
Rationale The average response time for single block reads for this file was 803 milliseconds.
i've use Raid 5 on my server
OS window server 2003
oracle 11g

Oracle Studnet,
One of the suggestions offered by Jonathan is that a drive in the RAID 5 array might have failed (died/crashed/offline). When that happens, the poor write performance that existed on the RAID array becomes much, much worse as the missing data from the failed drive must be reconstructed in real-time from the distributed parity data as read requests arrive and write requests are performed. Start by looking for a failed drive in the RAID array.
After verifying that a drive has not failed, take a look at the output of the following SQL statement:
SELECT
  SUBSTR(NAME,1,30) NAME,
  SUBSTR(VALUE,1,30) VALUE
FROM
  V$PARAMETER
ORDER BY
  NAME;To help us help you, please post the output of the above SQL statement to this forum. Use { code } tags (without spaces) before and after the output to preserve the spacing.
Does your server have the 32 bit version of Windows 2003, or the 64 bit version?
How much memory is in the server?
Is the RAID 5 array internal to the server (drives are physically installed in the server), or is there an external storage system?
Is everything stored on a single RAID 5 array, or are there multiple arrays, or multiple partitions on the same RAID 5 array?
What may not be clear from a licensing standpoint is that using the features of ADDM and ASH require an additional cost license. If you are not certain that your company purchased this additional cost license, I would advise against using it further - disable those features in Enterprise Manager.
When trying to performance tune, ask yourself what has changed? Failed hard drive? Failed RAM taken offline? Installation of a virus scanner? Running other applications on the server? Virus infection? Server out of physical memory and is using the swap file excessively? Server CPU is maxed out (greater than 85% utilization)?
After checking on the above, take a look at the system wide wait events. The wait event statistics reset when the database instance is restarted, so to use the wait event statistics properly, you must check the values, wait a short period of time, and then check the statistics again, subtracting the first set of values from the second. During the load process, execute the following query:
SELECT
  EVENT,
  TOTAL_WAITS,
  TOTAL_TIMEOUTS,
  TIME_WAITED,
  AVERAGE_WAIT
FROM
  V$SYSTEM_EVENT
WHERE
  EVENT NOT IN ('Null event','pmon timer','process startup','rdbms ipc reply','rdbms ipc message','reliable message','smon timer')
  AND EVENT NOT LIKE 'SQL*Net%';Wait 10 minutes, and then execute the SQL statement a second time. Subtract the first set of values for TOTAL_WAITS, TOTAL_TIMEOUTS, and TIME_WAITED from the second and post the results here.
When checking the V$SYSTEM_EVENT view, also execute the following (at the start and end of the 10 minute time period), saving the results so the first set of VALUE values may be subtracted from the second.
SELECT
  STAT_NAME,
  VALUE
FROM
  V$OSSTAT
ORDER BY
  STAT_NAME;
SELECT
  STAT_NAME,
  VALUE
FROM
  V$SYS_TIME_MODEL
ORDER BY
  STAT_NAME;Post the results here for assistance.
Charles Hooper
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

Similar Messages

  • Write Performanc Issues.

    Hi
    Oracle : 11.2.0.2.0 EE.
    Linux : Rhel 5.6.
    Dell R720 :
    EMC VNX SAN Storage :
    Here is the scenario:
    The dell server is connected to the SAN . We have 2 instances on this same server. When we create a tablespace on one instance it takes twice as long as creating the tablespace on the 2nd instance. The tablespaces are created on the san.
    At this point we have eliminated any hardware/ SAN issues. Since both databases are on the same server and hardware, connecting to the same lun on the san.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Below is the relative information of the creation scripts and init.ora parameters.
    Tablesapace creation Script for ORCL1 (Notice the 8k block size corresponding to the db_block_size on the db ).
    CREATE BIGFILE TABLESPACE TEST_IO BLOCKSIZE 8k LOGGING
    DATAFILE '/uP01/oracle/oradata/orcl1/TEST_IO_01.dbf'
    SIZE 256G AUTOEXTEND OFF
    EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL UNIFORM SIZE 256K
    SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO
    PERMANENT ONLINE;
    14 minutes to create
    Tablespace creation script for orcl 2 (Notice the 32k block size corresponding to the db_block_size on the db ).
    CREATE BIGFILE TABLESPACE TEST_IO BLOCKSIZE 32k LOGGING
    DATAFILE '/uP01/oracle/oradata/orcl2/TEST_IO_01.dbf'
    SIZE 256G AUTOEXTEND OFF
    EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL UNIFORM SIZE 256K
    SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO
    PERMANENT ONLINE;
    30minutes to create
    Init.ora on orcl1 :
    orcl1.__db_cache_size=494927872
    orcl1.__java_pool_size=4194304
    orcl1.__large_pool_size=4194304
    orcl1.__oracle_base='/opt/app/oracle/ora11g'#ORACLE_BASE set from environment
    orcl1.__pga_aggregate_target=536870912
    orcl1.__sga_target=1073741824
    orcl1.__shared_io_pool_size=0
    orcl1.__shared_pool_size=515899392
    orcl1.__streams_pool_size=25165824
    *._optimizer_extend_jppd_view_types=FALSE
    *._optimizer_group_by_placement=FALSE
    *._replace_virtual_columns=FALSE
    *.audit_file_dest='/opt/app/oracle/ora11g/admin/orcl1/adump'
    *.audit_trail='none'
    *.compatible='11.1.0.0.0'
    *.db_block_size=8192
    *.db_domain=''
    *.db_name='orcl1'
    *.diagnostic_dest='/opt/app/oracle/ora11g'
    *.local_listener=''
    *.open_cursors=1000
    *.pga_aggregate_target=536870912
    *.processes=500
    *.recyclebin='OFF'
    *.remote_login_passwordfile='EXCLUSIVE'
    *.sec_case_sensitive_logon=FALSE
    *.sessions=555
    *.sga_target=1073741824
    *.undo_tablespace='UNDOTBS1'
    orcl2
    *.db_block_size=32768
    *.db_cache_size=23068672000
    *.db_domain=''
    *.db_file_multiblock_read_count=32
    *.db_files=10000
    *.db_flashback_retention_target=0
    *.db_keep_cache_size=134217728
    *.db_name='orcl2'
    *.db_unique_name='ORCL2'
    *.diagnostic_dest='/opt/app/oracle/ora11g'
    *.fast_start_mttr_target=1200
    *.filesystemio_options='SETALL'
    *.java_pool_size=268435456
    *.job_queue_processes=4
    *.large_pool_size=134217728
    *.log_buffer=134217728
    *.log_checkpoint_timeout=0
    *.log_checkpoints_to_alert=TRUE
    *.open_cursors=1000
    *.pga_aggregate_target=31457280000
    *.processes=300
    *.query_rewrite_integrity='STALE_TOLERATED'
    *.recyclebin='OFF'
    *.remote_login_passwordfile='EXCLUSIVE'
    *.resource_limit=TRUE
    *.resumable_timeout=7200
    *.sessions=335
    *.shared_pool_reserved_size=134217728
    *.shared_pool_size=2147483648
    *.star_transformation_enabled='TRUE'
    *.trace_enabled=FALSE
    *.undo_retention=36000
    *.undo_tablespace='UNDOTBS1'

    >
    The dell server is connected to the SAN . We have 2 instances on this same server. When we create a tablespace on one instance it takes twice as long as creating the tablespace on the 2nd instance. The tablespaces are created on the san.
    At this point we have eliminated any hardware/ SAN issues. Since both databases are on the same server and hardware, connecting to the same lun on the san.
    >
    If those are really the config paramters for your instances then you may have some serious configuration issues.
    Instance 1
    1. you have shown SGA_TARGET is set (implying Automatice Shared Memory Management) but then you show the individual components have also been set: SHARED_POOL_SIZE, LARGE_POOL_SIZE, etc.
    Which are trying to use manual or automatic shared memory management?
    2. SGA_TARGET is set to only 1 GB. Why so small?
    Instance 2
    1. You have NOT set DB_nK_CACHE_SIZE but say you want to use 32 KB block size. This parameter MUST BE SET.
    2. You have set DB_CACHE_SIZE to 23 GB. Why? Your block size is 32 KB that you want to use. Only the SYSTEM tablespace will use the standard 8K blocks so why the enormous cache? You only used a cache of .5 GB and total memory target of 1 GB for instance 1.
    3. SGA_TARGET is NOT set - why not? why are you not using the same memory management as what you tried to do in instance 1.
    What is going on with these two instances that their config is so radically different?
    Daniel suggested a possible issue with the 32 KB block size. My hypothesis is that your configuration for both instances is faulty and that for instance 2 in particular your failure to provide any setting for DB_nK_CACHE_SIZE is a likely suspect for causing the issue.
    Review the DBA Guide for how to configure memory and the requirements for using non-standard block sizes.
    I would expect that once you have your instances configured properly you won't have the problem you reported.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e25494/memory004.htm
    About Automatic Shared Memory Management
    >
    Automatic Shared Memory Management simplifies SGA memory management. You specify the total amount of SGA memory available to an instance using the SGA_TARGET initialization parameter and Oracle Database automatically distributes this memory among the various SGA components to ensure the most effective memory utilization.
    >
    See the example for automatic management
    >
    You can take advantage of automatic shared memory management by setting Total SGA Size to 992M in Oracle Enterprise Manager, or by issuing the following statements:
    ALTER SYSTEM SET SGA_TARGET = 992M;
    ALTER SYSTEM SET SHARED_POOL_SIZE = 0;
    ALTER SYSTEM SET LARGE_POOL_SIZE = 0;
    ALTER SYSTEM SET JAVA_POOL_SIZE = 0;
    ALTER SYSTEM SET DB_CACHE_SIZE = 0;
    ALTER SYSTEM SET STREAMS_POOL_SIZE = 0;
    where 992M = 1200M minus 208M.
    >
    For non-standard block sizes see the section 'Setting the Buffer Cache Initialization Parameters'
    >
    Oracle Database supports multiple block sizes in a database. If you create tablespaces with nonstandard block sizes, you must configure nonstandard block size buffers to accommodate these tablespaces. The standard block size is used for the SYSTEM tablespace. You specify the standard block size by setting the initialization parameter DB_BLOCK_SIZE. Legitimate values are from 2K to 32K.
    If you intend to use multiple block sizes in your database, you must have the DB_CACHE_SIZE and at least one DB_nK_CACHE_SIZE parameter set. Oracle Database assigns an appropriate default value to the DB_CACHE_SIZE parameter, but the DB_nK_CACHE_SIZE parameters default to 0, and no additional block size caches are configured.
    The sizes and numbers of nonstandard block size buffers are specified by the following parameters:
    DB_2K_CACHE_SIZE
    DB_4K_CACHE_SIZE
    DB_8K_CACHE_SIZE
    DB_16K_CACHE_SIZE
    DB_32K_CACHE_SIZE
    Each parameter specifies the size of the cache for the corresponding block size.
    >
    Don't forget - when using non-standard block sizes you MUST set both the standard cache parameter (8k) and the non-standard parameter (32k for your use case).

  • How to investigate the sap ecc6 abap+java performancer issues

    Hi All,
    I have web as+java system.Of late we are facing performance problem with the system.Please let me know how to pinpoint the exact reason/culprit for the performance issue.
    I sthere any step by step procedure document with examples that si to be followed to check the performance issues..
    Thanks,
    kasperr.

    HI
    Check this link:
    [http://service.sap.com/performance|http://service.sap.com/performance]
    Regards
    Shridhar Gowda

  • Performanc Issue with KNVV table in report

    Hi,
    There is a report doing querry on KNVV and taking 93% of the database time. It retreives around 3 lacs records form this table and sometimes give time out error also.
    All the primary keys are meeting and all required fields are getting selected from the table.
    Is there any way out to improve the performance in this case. Would it be a good idea to create a secondary index on this table.
    I would really appriciate if any one can help me out on this.
    Many thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Ria

    Hi Ria,
    That looks to me about as efficient as you can make it.
    Try not to use into corresponding fields if you can help it. That should improve performance a bit.
    Maybe you can try the following:
    data: begin of t_reqd occurs 0,
            kunnr  like knvv-kunnr,
            bzirk  like knvv-bzirk,
          end of t_reqd.
    * Because we are selecting KUNNR and BZIRK and T_REQD has
    * KUNNR and BZIRK defined IN THAT ORDER we can just use
    * INTO TABLE. This will improve performance.
    select kunnr bzirk
           from knvv
           into table t_reqd
           where kunnr in s_kunnr and
                 vkorg eq w_vkorg and
                 vtweg eq w_vtweg and
                 spart eq w_spart.
    delete t_reqd where not bzirk in s_bzirk.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers,
    Pat.
    PS. Kindly assign Reward Points to the posts you find helpful.

  • Performanc issue...help..

    Hi all
    i want to increase performance in one Existing program..this program is working fine but performance is very poor. we r indexing the required filed.
    but i find some nested select  loop inside this program...
    pls ,,suggest me how can i avoid this kind of nested select loop. instead of loop statement  can i user read statement  for avoiding the nested loop???
    pls check the below code.
    if any problem  within this logice  then change the code.
    thanks in advance.
    Indu
    SORT it_but000 BY partner.
          LOOP AT it_ever INTO wa_ever.
            LOOP AT it_fkkvkp INTO wa_fkkvkp WHERE vkont = wa_ever-vkonto.
         READ TABLE it_but000 INTO wa_but000 WITH KEY partner = wa_fkkvkp-gpart
                                                           BINARY SEARCH.
              IF sy-subrc = 0.
                IF wa_but000-name_org1 IS INITIAL.
                  CONCATENATE wa_but000-name_first
                              wa_but000-name_last
                  INTO wa_final-cust_name SEPARATED BY space.
                  CONDENSE wa_final-cust_name.
                ELSE.
                  wa_final-cust_name = wa_but000-name_org1.
                ENDIF.
                wa_final-gpart = wa_fkkvkp-gpart.
    MODIFY it_final FROM wa_final TRANSPORTING cust_name gpart WHERE vertrag = wa_ever-vertrag.
              ENDIF.
            ENDLOOP.
          ENDLOOP.
    LOOP AT it_isu_data.
        LOOP AT it_iflot WHERE tplnr = it_isu_data-tplnr.
          wa_final-s_o_code = it_iflot-zwst_wtr.
          MODIFY it_final FROM wa_final TRANSPORTING s_o_code
          WHERE vertrag = it_isu_data-vertrag.
          CLEAR wa_final-s_o_code.
        ENDLOOP.
    LOOP AT it_final INTO wa_final.
        LOOP AT it_erch WHERE vertrag = wa_final-vertrag.
         IF it_erch-vertrag = wa_final-vertrag.
          SELECT SINGLE tariftyp
                        branche
          FROM eanlh
          INTO (l_tariftyp, l_branche)
          WHERE ab <= it_erch-erdat AND bis > it_erch-erdat
          AND anlage = wa_final-anlage.
          IF sy-subrc = 0.
            wa_final-t_type = l_tariftyp.
            IF l_tariftyp IS NOT INITIAL.
              SELECT SINGLE ttypbez
              FROM ettat
              INTO l_ttypbez
              WHERE spras = sy-langu
              AND   tariftyp = l_tariftyp.
              wa_final-c_description = l_ttypbez.
            ENDIF.
            MODIFY it_final FROM wa_final TRANSPORTING c_description t_type. "sic_code
          ENDIF.
          CLEAR it_erch.
        ENDLOOP.
        CLEAR: wa_final, l_tariftyp, l_ttypbez, l_branche.
      ENDLOOP.
    DATA : it_egerh TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ty_egerh,
             wa_egerh TYPE ty_egerh.
      LOOP AT it_final INTO wa_final.
        LOOP AT it_erch WHERE vertrag = wa_final-vertrag.
          wa_comb-equnr = wa_final-equnr.
          wa_comb-erdat = it_erch-erdat.
          APPEND wa_comb TO it_comb.
          CLEAR wa_comb.
          CLEAR it_erch.
        ENDLOOP.
        CLEAR wa_final.
      ENDLOOP.
      IF  it_final[] IS NOT INITIAL.
        SELECT anlage
               logikzw
               bis
               preiskla
        FROM easts
        INTO TABLE it_easts
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_final
        WHERE anlage = it_final-anlage.
        IF sy-subrc = 0.
          LOOP AT it_final INTO wa_final.
            LOOP AT it_easts INTO wa_easts WHERE anlage = wa_final-anlage.
              wa_final-m_size = wa_easts-preiskla.
              MODIFY it_final FROM wa_final TRANSPORTING m_size WHERE anlage = wa_final-anlage.
            ENDLOOP.
          ENDLOOP.

    Hi Indu,
    if u got Nested Loops then use PARALLEL CURSOR METHOD .
    The performance will be very good.
    Nested Loops – This is one of the fear factors for all the ABAP developers as this consumes lot of program execution time. If the number of entries in the internal tables is huge, then the situation would be too worse. The solution for this is to use parallel cursor method whenever there is a need for Nested Loop.
    Program using Normal Nested Loop:
    REPORT  ZNORMAL_NESTEDLOOP.
    TABLES:
      likp,
      lips.
    Data:
      t_likp  type table of likp,
      t_lips  type TABLE OF lips.
    data:
      W_RUNTIME1 TYPE I,
      W_RUNTIME2 TYPE I.
    START-OF-SELECTION.
    select *
      from likp
      into table t_likp.
    select *
      from lips
      into table t_lips.
    get RUN TIME FIELD w_runtime1.
    loop at t_likp into likp.
      loop at t_lips into lips where vbeln eq likp-vbeln.
      endloop.
    endloop.
    get RUN TIME FIELD w_runtime2.
    w_runtime2 = w_runtime2 - w_runtime1.
    write w_runtime2.
    Nested Loop using Parallel Cursor:
    REPORT  zparallel_cursor2.
    TABLES:
      likp,
      lips.
    DATA:
      t_likp  TYPE TABLE OF likp,
      t_lips  TYPE TABLE OF lips.
    DATA:
      w_runtime1 TYPE i,
      w_runtime2 TYPE i,
      w_index LIKE sy-index.
    START-OF-SELECTION.
      SELECT *
        FROM likp
        INTO TABLE t_likp.
      SELECT *
        FROM lips
        INTO TABLE t_lips.
      GET RUN TIME FIELD w_runtime1.
      SORT t_likp BY vbeln.
      SORT t_lips BY vbeln.
      LOOP AT t_likp INTO likp.
        LOOP AT t_lips INTO lips FROM w_index.
          IF likp-vbeln NE lips-vbeln.
            w_index = sy-tabix.
            EXIT.
          ENDIF.
        ENDLOOP.
      ENDLOOP.
      GET RUN TIME FIELD w_runtime2.
      w_runtime2 = w_runtime2 - w_runtime1.
      WRITE w_runtime2.
    Analysis report: Runtime in microseconds: 
    Iteration No ...... Normal Nested Loop ..... Using Parallel Cursor
    1...................... 34,796,147 .........................63,829
    2 ..................... 38,534,583 ......................... 56,894
    3 ..................... 34,103,426 ......................... 50,510
    Please check this link
    http://www.****************/Tutorials/ABAP/ParallelCursor.htm
    reward if helpful
    raam.

  • Write Data storage VI performanc​e issue

    I have a program that logs data from mulitple channels.  It waits for 500 points from each channel, then saves the data (as a raw 2D DBL array) to file, wait for another 500 points, saves and so on.  At the end, I have a raw file.  I created a utility VI that would take the raw file and converts it to a tdm file so I can read it in Diadem.  The utility VI has a for loop.  In each iteration, the loop reads one data segment (the 500-point 2D array), converts the channel data to waveforms and then writes/appends to a tdm file using the Write Data (Channel) storage VI.  The VI works fine for small files.  But as the file gets larger, the conversion time seems to increase exponentially.  Eventually grinding to a halt.
    I noticed that each iteration of the for loop seems to take longer and longer.  So I suspect the Write Data VI may not be simply appending to the existing channel data.  But instead, each time it's probably reading back the waveform data already saved, recombine them with the new data and then rewrite the entire file.  This is just a guess.
    Anyway, I really need some help resolving the performance issue.  Any response will be appreciated.  The conversion VI is attached.
    S.
    LabView 8.0
    Message Edited by Seaman008 on 06-01-2007 01:50 PM
    Attachments:
    Convert2.vi ‏184 KB

    Here are two profile captures.  Each capture start at the first entry into the inner-most for loop and stop when it exited the loop.  Profile2.txt was captured when processing a RAW input file twice the size as in Profile.txt.  I'm not familiar with the VIs listed, but it shows that lot of time was spent in _saveDdtAttributes.vi and _saveDDT.vi. 
    Attachments:
    profile.txt ‏131 KB
    profile2.txt ‏132 KB

  • Qosmio X505-Q870 Performanc​e Issues While on Battery

    Hello to All,
         I am new to the forum and wanted to present an issue to the knowledgeable regarding performance (gaming) while on battery.  I've noticed that the Q870 performs very well in all facets of gaming, and there are very few games that this system cannot run.  While connected to the wall outlet, the laptop consistently pumps out 45-75 fps in BFBC2 and the same framerate for other games such as COD: World at War and COD: Modern Warfare.  The problem is the battery....
         As soon as I unplug the laptop from AC power, the framerate drops to 15 fps and, in some cases with Crysis, 7 fps.  I have the Power Options set to High Performance, but that doesn't seem to matter.  I understand that the battery will be quickly depleted if games are run at full framerate, however, what's the purpose of a gaming laptop if the battery cannot handle the performance?  I plan to augment the existing battery with a 20,000MaH external battery, however, I need to figure a solution to this problem or else the battery will be useless.  Please help!!

    Bump

  • Prime-time Performanc​e Issues

    I'm paying for Quantum Internet service 75/35, but lately I'm noticing that watching AppleTV and Netflix in the evenings is getting hard to do. It seems like between 9:30 and 10:30pm EST my FiOS performance is getting really bad. This causes shows to halt/buffer multiple times and is souring the entire viewing experience.
    Here's my ususal (daytime) performance using Verizon's own speed test tool, which is what I expect:
    And here's what I've been getting at night, about 3Mb/s or sometimes less:
    As you would imagine, this is causing large buffering delays as I'm trying to stream HD content.
    I know I can try to reduce image quality to minimize required bandwidth, but that's not the point; this is NOT the Internet service I'm paying for.
    Please note that my AppleTV device is HARD WIRED to my FiOS router. Also note that I am not using the FiOS router's on-board WiFi; that's turned off and I am serving WiFI in my house via two HARD WIRED Apple devices (a time capsule and an AirPort Express). I am seeing this performance on all devices in my house at these times, whether they are wired or wireless. Also note that I'm getting this test from Verizon's own site, which is hitting their own servers, which means that the interface between Apple, Amazon, Netflix, etc. and Verizon shouldn't have any bearing on the issue.
    Of course all calls to support have been about resetting my router, rebooting the ONT, etc. and nothing is getting better. I am trying to tell Verizon that they need to test the performance/capacity of their MAN/WAN infrastructure, but the agent can't do that, and can't even do a loopback speed test through my router to confirm or refute the performance I'm seeing.
    I don't know what else to do at this point, so I'll put it to the community. It looks like a lot of other people are seeing issues aligning with evening (i.e. prime time download) hours and I'm wondering if Verizon has oversold their capacity in my area (Tampa FL). They may have the fibers that can deliver a gig to each house, but if they don't have the router bandwidth and the backhaul bandwith to actually support it out to their network edge, it's a moot point.
    Is there any way I can get someone's attention in the network engineering team at Verizon? At this point they either know they have a major issue and don't want to admit it, or have a local failure (bad PON card, loose connector, overloaded internediate router, etc) that they have yet to diagnose. The call center staff doesn't seem to know how to get to the bottom of this.

    Hi JDinTampa,
    Your issue has been escalated to a Verizon agent. Before the agent can begin assisting you, they will need to collect further information from you. Please go to your profile page for the forum and look at the top of the middle column where you will find an area titled "My Support Cases". You can reach your profile page by clicking on your name beside your post, or at the top left of this page underneath the title of the board.
    Under "My Support Cases" you will find a link to the private board where you and the agent may exchange information. This should be checked on a frequent basis, as the agent may be waiting for information from you before they can proceed with any actions. To ensure you know when they have responded to you, at the top of your support case there is a drop down menu for support case options. Open that and choose "subscribe". Please keep all correspondence regarding your issue in the private support portal.

  • HP Envy 15-j075nr - Issues with gaming performanc​e (slow-moti​on gaming)

    SPECS: 
    Display: 15.6" diagonal HD BrightView LED-backlit display (1366 x 768)
    Memory: 8GB installed memory
    Hard drive: 750GB 5400RPM hard drive with HP ProtectSmart Hard Drive Protection
    Processor: AMD Elite Quad-Core A10-5750M Accelerated Processor
    Operating system:Windows 8
    Graphics card: AMD Radeon HD 8650G graphics with up to 4204MB total graphics memory
    Running on the exact specs above, I'm playing games via Steam (Tomb Raider, Saints Row IV, Dishonored, etc) and have had to compromise video/display quality settings  just to get the games to play correctly. Most games have an auto-detect feature for display and audio settings and in each instance the games are set to Ultra or High settings. But when I begin to the play the games with the default settings that games are extremely slow, though the graphics look great. 
    Given the specs above and the fact that the games auto detect at the highest or near to the highest settings, might I have an issue with my current system settings that I could tweak in order to get a higher quality gaming experience? I feel like these settings are definitely good enough to get at least HIGH display quality, but that has yet to work. 

    Hi @trickster878 
    I understand you are having performance issues with games on your notebook computer, but really notebook computers for the most part are not intended to be gaming machines. Their design focus is more to be light weight and portable while also providing the ability to run for two hours or more without a power connection when fully charged.
    Many of the things that make for a good gaming machine are sacrificed in a notebook. All that being said, it is possible to play many games on notebooks, but rarely as well as it would work on a desktop computer.
    It is likely that you can tweak the settings to get a compromise that is more playable, but it is often a robbing Peter to pay Paul situation. Something may have to be sacrificed.
    You can take a look at these pages and see if anything helps.
    Computer Locks Up or Freezes When Playing a Game
    HP PCs - Improving System Performance without Adding Memory (Windows 8)
    Otherwise, you would probably need to look at the video settings in each of the games you are trying to play. The settings will need to be customized for each of them, and you may have to look at the pages/forums for the individual game to see which setting may have to be changed internal to that game.
    Malygris1
    I work on behalf of HP
    Please click Accept as Solution if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click Kudos Thumbs Up on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • Pavilion Dv7 4165dx Hard drive failure and performanc​e issues?

    I have a pavilion dv7 4165dx notebook that was working great until a couple of months  when the performance of my machine started to decrease rapidly. I have performance issues with the machine because it takes 1 to 2 minutes to get from the welcome screen to the actual desktop and another 3 to 4 minutes for it to be ready to use. I already upgrade the memory from 4gb to 8gb but instead of going faster it goes slower and i also did a clean install of windows but it didn't help. Before i have problems it took maybe 30 to 50 seconds to go from the welcome screen to the actual desktop and 1 minute and 30 seconds to be ready to use and by the way i use soluto to tell me when the machine is ready for use.Then last week i notice that the headphone jack wasn't working properly so i contact hp and they told me to send them the laptop so i did, they replace the motherboard and they  send it back to me and i just got it today it got a little better but it still lags on the welcome screen and to open programs. I check the memory using memtest 86 and the memory it's fine, but i check the hard drive with HDD Regenerator 2011 and it show i have one delayed sector. Then i check on hd tune pro and it show me some WARNING on section Calibration retry count( as you can see on the picture below)  so my question is should i be worry and send it back to hp or what can i do to fix the problem i am having with this notebook?

    I have the same laptop and have had issues with it since the day i brought it home. I have had it for a year now and am now replacing the hard drive for the 3rd time. My guess would be its your hard drive because most of the issues you seem to be having ar the same ones ive been dealing with for a while. I can say I'm very mad about the quality of this laptop and am in the process of  battling with HP over this issue. If you have a chance go online and look at all the hard drive issues that this laptop has had and even look at the HP forums for this issue it will irritate you and make you wonder why this hasn't been fixed yet!

  • Performanc​e issues - CVI 2010

    Hi all,
    I have code I've compiled on a development machine - XP Pro with SP3 - and I'm seeing some performance issues on a similarly configured test machine.  2GB Ram, Pentium 4 CPU 2.8GHz.  I had our IT person clean off another machine for me to use exclusively for testing (the other machine is our Tester's PC) and he gave me one with an Intel Core2 4300 @ 1.80 GHz.  My code on my test machine runs like a top with NO problems. 
    We have another PC running Win7 on an Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10 GHz, RAM = 4GB.  The code should be screaming on this machine but we're seeing performance problems here, too, that I believe may be due to the OS - Win7 may be a real hog.
    Can anyone make sense of this?  Is the dual core that much better even though that CPU is rated lower in PassMark Bench Ratings (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php).  We're trying to work all this out so we can advise the customer on which machine he needs to run our software.
    Thanks,
    Judy

    Hi Judy,
    Looking at the spreadsheet it seems unlikely that memory or cpu requirements are the root cause of the issue because the second machine in the spreadsheet with poor "performance" has almost twice the CPU clock speed and twice the physical memory of the fourth machine that runs well.
    It sounds like your application is a fairly complex application that involves both GUI components and instrument I/O so what needs to be done is determine what part of the application is causing the bottleneck. There are many different factors which if not considered properly when developing applications that can cause performance problems such as thread deadlocks, device driver problems with the instruments or other hardware, needing to adjust the sleep policy for GUI events, writing to TDMS files in CVI versions before 2010 SP1, having memory leaks in the application code, etc. There is also a KB called Improving Performance of LabWindows™/CVI Applications that describes some changes which may help improve performance.
    The overall message is that it is not only CPU speed and quantity of RAM available that can cause performance problems. A way to check the amount of RAM used by an application and CPU Utilization is to use the Windows 7 Resource Monitor to watch the application. This can be done by running Task Manager (ctrl + shift + esc), selecting the Performance tab and pressing Resource Monitor. This will open the Resource Monitor window where you can check CPU usage, Memory, Disk and Network usage for the application while it is running.
    Milan

  • Performanc​e issues with GOOP

    I would like to use GOOP in my next application development. Does anyone know if there is known performance issues I should be aware of?

    That is a great question. I found a couple of other threads in the LabVIEW forum which address performance issues with GOOP:
    http://sine.ni.com/niforum/niforum?forumDU=http://​forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&messag​e.id=30132&requireLogin=False
    http://sine.ni.com/niforum/niforum?forumDU=http://​forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&messag​e.id=30132&requireLogin=False

  • Performanc​e Issues with the Support Forum

    Thank you for visiting the new HP Consumer Support Forums.
    We know that the site is having intermittent performance issues. We are actively working on the issue and hope to have it resolved shortly. 
    See you on the boards.
    GarenT
    One of the HP Forum Admins. 
    Message Edited by DaniW on 11-21-2008 07:24 AM
    HP Product Expert for the Officejet Pro X Series.
    Was your question answered? Mark it as an Accepted Solution!
    See a great post? Give it a Kudos!

    We have just completed an enhancement to the Forum and believe you should see much better site performance
    THANKS!
    DaniW
    HP Forum Admin
    --Say "Thanks" by clicking the Kudos Star in the post that helped you.
    --Please mark the post that solves your problem as "Accepted Solution"

  • Performanc​e Issue

    Dear Friends, I would like to know
    Will there be a performance issue, If I use 2D Array instead of 1D array. Because I'm working in a time critical issue.
    And I would like to know How to optimize the time, in case of LabView. Is there any guide lines, If so, can you provide some guideline/Link
    Thank you,
    Best Regards,
    Rathan

    rathan wrote:
    Dear Friends, I would like to know
    Will there be a performance issue,...If so, can you provide some guideline/Link
    Thank you,
    Best Regards,
    Rathan
    This Tag cloud is for LabVIEW Perfomance realted threads. Most all performance related issues are covered by that collection.
    Have fun!
    Ben
    Ben Rayner
    I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
    Rayner's Ridge is under construction

  • Datasocket calls from Fieldpoint - performanc​e issues

    I'm noticing that it takes A LONG TIME for the fieldpoint units to READ data from a Datasocket Server. My program is currently looping and reading 4 Datasocket Items from a server computer(in a for loop) but it takes around 3 seconds for this process to occur. Any suggestions as to how i can "speed" up these datasocket reads? Would using a different protocol (to read datasockets item) be quicker?
    Regis

    "the loop time dropped from 3 seconds
    to under 1 sec (about 750ms)"
    I wanted to mention that the 750ms was a pre-defined wait time i placed
    in the loop.  Without a wait time,  I dropped the loop time
    to about  80ms.
    Also,  can anyone please help me with this issue?
    Datasocket ReadWrite Mode
    Message Edited by RegisPhilbin on 07-20-2005 11:00 AM

Maybe you are looking for