Performance Issue: Deadlocks RAC
Hello,
Our team are recently doing performance tests in our RAC 11gR2 3 nodes Lab under Redhat Linux 5.
During the tests, there are deadlocks detected in the alert log file;
Tue Nov 15 11:22:54 2011
Global Enqueue Services Deadlock detected. More info in file
/opt/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/db/db1/trace/db1_lmd0_12563.trc.
Global Enqueue Services Deadlock detected. More info in file
/opt/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/db/db1/trace/db1_lmd0_12563.trc.
Tue Nov 15 11:23:10 2011
Global Enqueue Services Deadlock detected. More info in file
/opt/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/db/db1/trace/db1_lmd0_12563.trc.
Tue Nov 15 11:23:10 2011
Dumping diagnostic data in directory=[cdmp_20111115113104], requested by (instance=3, osid=13645), summary=[abnormal process termination].
Tue Nov 15 11:23:37 2011
Global Enqueue Services Deadlock detected. More info in file
/opt/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/db/db1/trace/db1_lmd0_12563.trc.
....About 50% of the queries are failing with this error; Looking into the trace file I have ;
/opt/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/db/db1/trace/db1_lmd0_12563.trc
user session for deadlock lock 0x3d2438198
sid: 200 ser: 9277 audsid: 1824543 user: 68/SNEADMIN
flags: (0x45) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
pid: 65 O/S info: user: grid, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 5258
image: oracle@db01
client details:
O/S info: user: cceadmin, term: unknown, ospid: 1234
machine: ca.gency.com program: JDBC Thin Client
application name: JDBC Thin Client, hash value=2546894660
current SQL:
update CCE_ORDER_ITEM_DETAILS set ORDER_ID=:1 , CLUSTER_ID=:2 where ORDER_LINE_ITEM_ID=:3 and CLUSTER_ID=:4
DUMP LOCAL BLOCKER: initiate state dump for DEADLOCK
possible owner[65.5258] on resource TM-0001DF87-00000000
*** 2011-11-15 05:34:48.194
Submitting asynchronized dump request [28]. summary=[ges process stack dump (kjdglblkrdm1)].
Global blockers dump end:-----------------------------------
Global Wait-For-Graph(WFG) at ddTS[0.5] :
BLOCKED 0x3d2438198 4 wq 2 cvtops x1 TM 0x1df87.0x0(ext 0x0,0x0)[41000-0001-000004A5] inst 1
BLOCKER 0x3d7846108 4 wq 2 cvtops x1 TM 0x1df87.0x0(ext 0x0,0x0)[38000-0002-00002C68] inst 2
BLOCKED 0x3d7846108 4 wq 2 cvtops x1 TM 0x1df87.0x0(ext 0x0,0x0)[38000-0002-00002C68] inst 2
BLOCKER 0x3d75a4fd8 4 wq 2 cvtops x1 TM 0x1df87.0x0(ext 0x0,0x0)[43000-0003-000009C1] inst 3
BLOCKED 0x3d75a4fd8 4 wq 2 cvtops x1 TM 0x1df87.0x0(ext 0x0,0x0)[43000-0003-000009C1] inst 3
BLOCKER 0x3d2438198 4 wq 2 cvtops x1 TM 0x1df87.0x0(ext 0x0,0x0)[41000-0001-000004A5] inst 1
.....Any idea please , I can provide more information if needed
Thanks
The deadlocks posted seem to be concerned with mode 4 TM locksFrom the following links:
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/lock-horror/
http://www.rachelp.nl/index_kb.php?menu=articles&actie=show&id=15
and this information related to the third column in the global wait-for-graph:
#define KJUSERNL 0 /* no permissions */ (Null)
#define KJUSERCR 1 /* concurrent read */ (Row-S (SS))
#define KJUSERCW 2 /* concurrent write */ (Row-X (SX))
#define KJUSERPR 3 /* protected read */ (Share)
#define KJUSERPW 4 /* protected write */ (S/Row-X (SSX))
#define KJUSEREX 5 /* exclusive access */ (Exclusive)It seems I may have misinterpreted the "4" as meaning mode 4 when it should be mode "5"
If it is mode 5 that then might support the unindexed self-referential foreign key as I hope the demo below will illustrate.
Let me create a table will the relevant fk ( I used a 2 column fk just because it was similar to your situation but it's not relevant that it's 2 columns).
SQL> create table t1
2 (col1 number not null
3 ,col2 number not null
4 ,col3 varchar2(10) not null
5 ,related_col1 number
6 ,related_col2 number);
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> alter table t1 add constraint pk_t1 primary key (col1,col2);
Table altered.
SQL>
SQL> alter table t1 add constraint fk_t1 foreign key
2 (related_col1,related_col2) references t1 (col1,col2);
Table altered.
SQL>
SQL> insert into t1 values (1,1,'X',null,null);
1 row created.
SQL> insert into t1 values (2,2,'X',null,null);
1 row created.
SQL> commit;Now, show that if you don't update one of the columns involved in the pk, there's no issue with blocking locks:
Session 1:
Session1>update t1
2 set col3 = 'Y'
3 where col1 = 1
4 and col2 = 1;
1 row updated.
Session1>Session 2:
Session2>update t1
2 set col3 = 'Y'
3 where col1 = 2
4 and col2 = 2;
1 row updated.
Session2>But if the update statement updates one of the columns in the primary key which is referenced in the foreign key on the same table:
Session 1:
Session1>update t1
2 set col2 = 1
3 , col3 = 'Y'
4 where col1 = 1
5 and col2 = 1;
1 row updated.
Session1>Session 2 hangs:
Session2>update t1
2 set col1 = 2
3 , col3 = 'Y'
4 where col1 = 2
5 and col2 = 2;
hangsAnd you can see here that session 2 is waiting on a mode 5 TM lock:
Session1>l
1 select process,
2 l.sid,
3 type,
4 lmode,
5 request,
6 do.object_name
7 from v$locked_object lo,
8 dba_objects do,
9 v$lock l
10 where lo.object_id = do.object_id
11 AND l.sid = lo.session_id
12* AND do.object_name = 'T1'
Session1>/
PROCESS SID TY LMODE REQUEST OBJECT_NAM
4724:6028 1514 TM 0 5 T1
4724:6028 1514 AE 4 0 T1
4408:2384 380 TX 6 0 T1
4408:2384 380 TM 3 0 T1
4408:2384 380 AE 4 0 T1
Session1>However, if I create an index on that fk, the update no longer has the blocking issue:
Session1>create index i_t1 on t1 (related_col1, related_col2);
Index created.
Session1>update t1
2 set col2 = 1
3 , col3 = 'Y'
4 where col1 = 1
5 and col2 = 1;
1 row updated.
Session1>And session 2 no longer blocks:
Session2>update t1
2 set col1 = 2
3 , col3 = 'Y'
4 where col1 = 2
5 and col2 = 2;
1 row updated.
Session2>What of course I've missed is the added complexity which makes this a deadlock scenario involving these mode 5 locks.
We can do that artificially using the two sets of statements to make sure the two sessions are also competing for the same rows.
.... in session 1
Session1>drop index i_t1
2 /
Index dropped.
Session1>
Session1>update t1
2 set col3 = 'Y'
3 where col1 = 2
4 and col2 = 2;
1 row updated.
Session1>
.... over to session 2
Session2>update t1
2 set col3 = 'Y'
3 where col1 = 1
4 and col2 = 1;
1 row updated.
Session2>
.... back to session 1
Session1>update t1
2 set col2 = 1
3 , col3 = 'Y'
4 where col1 = 1
5 and col2 = 1;
.... back to Session 2
Session2>update t1
2 set col1 = 2
3 , col3 = 'Y'
4 where col1 = 2
5 and col2 = 2;
.... wait a few secs ....
update t1
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
Session2>rollback;And the locks involved in the deadlock look like this:
SQL> /
PROCESS SID TY LMODE REQUEST OBJECT_NAM
4724:6028 1514 TX 6 0 T1
4724:6028 1514 TM 3 5 T1
4724:6028 1514 AE 4 0 T1
4408:2384 380 TX 6 0 T1
4408:2384 380 TM 3 5 T1
4408:2384 380 AE 4 0 T1
6 rows selected.
SQL> So your situation might be slightly more complicated and you always have to bear in mind that the deadlock trace files do not tell you everything you need to know about all the statements involved in the deadlock situation. But it certainly points to this being an issue.
Edited by: Dom Brooks on Nov 16, 2011 2:39 PM
Edited by: Dom Brooks on Nov 16, 2011 2:46 PM
Added deadlock demo
Similar Messages
-
Performance issue showing read by other session Event
Hi All,
we are having a severe performance issue in my database when we are running batch jobs.
This was a new database(11.2.0.2) and we are testing the performance by running some batch jobs. These batch jobs included some inserts and updates.
I am seeing read by other session in top 5 timed events and cache buffers chains in Latch Miss Sources section.
Please help me to solve this out.
Inst Num Startup Time Release RAC
1 27-Feb-12 09:03 11.2.0.2.0 NO
Platform CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
Linux x86 64-bit 8 8 8 48.00
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 5605 29-Feb-12 03:00:27 63 4.5
End Snap: 5614 29-Feb-12 12:00:47 63 4.3
Elapsed: 540.32 (mins)
DB Time: 1,774.23 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 1,952M 1,952M Std Block Size: 16K
Shared Pool Size: 1,024M 1,024M Log Buffer: 18,868K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s): 3.3 0.8 0.02 0.05
DB CPU(s): 1.1 0.3 0.01 0.02
Redo size: 55,763.8 13,849.3
Logical reads: 23,906.6 5,937.4
Block changes: 325.7 80.9
Physical reads: 665.6 165.3
Physical writes: 40.4 10.0
User calls: 60.7 15.1
Parses: 10.6 2.6
Hard parses: 1.1 0.3
W/A MB processed: 0.6 0.2
Logons: 0.1 0.0
Executes: 151.2 37.6
Rollbacks: 0.0 0.0
Transactions: 4.0
Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 99.94 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 97.90 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 98.06 Soft Parse %: 90.16
Execute to Parse %: 92.96 Latch Hit %: 100.00
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 76.71 % Non-Parse CPU: 98.57
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 89.38 87.96
% SQL with executions>1: 97.14 95.15
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 96.05 92.46
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
db file sequential read 14,092,706 65,613 5 61.6 User I/O
DB CPU 34,819 32.7
read by other session 308,534 1,260 4 1.2 User I/O
direct path read 97,454 987 10 .9 User I/O
db file scattered read 71,870 910 13 .9 User I/O
Host CPU (CPUs: 8 Cores: 8 Sockets: 8)
~~~~~~~~ Load Average
Begin End %User %System %WIO %Idle
0.43 0.36 13.7 0.6 9.7 85.7
Instance CPU
~~~~~~~~~~~~
% of total CPU for Instance: 13.5
% of busy CPU for Instance: 94.2
%DB time waiting for CPU - Resource Mgr: 0.0
Memory Statistics
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Begin End
Host Mem (MB): 49,152.0 49,152.0
SGA use (MB): 3,072.0 3,072.0
PGA use (MB): 506.5 629.1
% Host Mem used for SGA+PGA: 7.28 7.53
Time Model Statistics
-> Total time in database user-calls (DB Time): 106453.8s
-> Statistics including the word "background" measure background process
time, and so do not contribute to the DB time statistic
-> Ordered by % or DB time desc, Statistic name
Statistic Name Time (s) % of DB Time
sql execute elapsed time 105,531.1 99.1
DB CPU 34,818.8 32.7
parse time elapsed 714.7 .7
hard parse elapsed time 684.8 .6
PL/SQL execution elapsed time 161.9 .2
PL/SQL compilation elapsed time 44.2 .0
connection management call elapsed time 16.9 .0
hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time 10.2 .0
hard parse (bind mismatch) elapsed time 9.4 .0
sequence load elapsed time 2.9 .0
repeated bind elapsed time 0.5 .0
failed parse elapsed time 0.0 .0
DB time 106,453.8
background elapsed time 1,753.9
background cpu time 61.7
Operating System Statistics
-> *TIME statistic values are diffed.
All others display actual values. End Value is displayed if different
-> ordered by statistic type (CPU Use, Virtual Memory, Hardware Config), Name
Statistic Value End Value
BUSY_TIME 3,704,415
IDLE_TIME 22,203,740
IOWAIT_TIME 2,517,864
NICE_TIME 3
SYS_TIME 145,696
USER_TIME 3,557,758
LOAD 0 0
RSRC_MGR_CPU_WAIT_TIME 0
VM_IN_BYTES 358,813,045,760
VM_OUT_BYTES 29,514,830,848
PHYSICAL_MEMORY_BYTES 51,539,607,552
NUM_CPUS 8
NUM_CPU_CORES 8
NUM_CPU_SOCKETS 8
GLOBAL_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
GLOBAL_SEND_SIZE_MAX 1,048,586
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_DEFAULT 87,380
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MIN 4,096
TCP_SEND_SIZE_DEFAULT 16,384
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MIN 4,096
Operating System Statistics -
Snap Time Load %busy %user %sys %idle %iowait
29-Feb 03:00:27 0.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
29-Feb 04:00:35 1.4 11.9 11.2 0.6 88.1 14.3
29-Feb 05:00:41 1.7 13.8 13.2 0.6 86.2 15.8
29-Feb 06:00:48 1.5 14.0 13.5 0.6 86.0 12.3
29-Feb 07:01:00 1.8 16.3 15.8 0.5 83.7 10.4
29-Feb 08:00:12 2.6 23.2 22.5 0.6 76.8 12.6
29-Feb 09:00:26 1.3 16.6 16.0 0.5 83.4 5.7
29-Feb 10:00:33 1.2 13.8 13.3 0.5 86.2 2.0
29-Feb 11:00:43 1.3 14.5 14.0 0.5 85.5 3.8
29-Feb 12:00:47 0.4 4.9 4.2 0.7 95.1 10.6
Foreground Wait Class
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
-> Captured Time accounts for 97.9% of Total DB time 106,453.79 (s)
-> Total FG Wait Time: 69,415.64 (s) DB CPU time: 34,818.79 (s)
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait
Wait Class Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) %DB time
User I/O 14,693,843 0 69,222 5 65.0
DB CPU 34,819 32.7
Commit 40,629 0 119 3 0.1
System I/O 26,504 0 57 2 0.1
Network 1,945,010 0 11 0 0.0
Other 125,200 99 4 0 0.0
Application 2,673 0 2 1 0.0
Concurrency 3,059 0 1 0 0.0
Configuration 31 19 0 15 0.0
Foreground Wait Events
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
db file sequential read 14,092,706 0 65,613 5 108.0 61.6
read by other session 308,534 0 1,260 4 2.4 1.2
direct path read 97,454 0 987 10 0.7 .9
db file scattered read 71,870 0 910 13 0.6 .9
db file parallel read 35,001 0 372 11 0.3 .3
log file sync 40,629 0 119 3 0.3 .1
control file sequential re 26,504 0 57 2 0.2 .1
direct path read temp 14,499 0 49 3 0.1 .0
direct path write temp 9,186 0 28 3 0.1 .0
SQL*Net message to client 1,923,973 0 5 0 14.7 .0
SQL*Net message from dblin 1,056 0 5 5 0.0 .0
Disk file operations I/O 8,848 0 2 0 0.1 .0
ASM file metadata operatio 36 0 2 54 0.0 .0
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 2,636 0 1 1 0.0 .0
ADR block file read 472 0 1 1 0.0 .0
os thread startup 8 0 1 74 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data to clien 17,656 0 1 0 0.1 .0
asynch descriptor resize 123,852 100 0 0 0.9 .0
local write wait 110 0 0 4 0.0 .0
utl_file I/O 55,635 0 0 0 0.4 .0
log file switch (private s 8 0 0 52 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S wait on X 2 0 0 142 0.0 .0
enq: KO - fast object chec 13 0 0 20 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 248 0 0 1 0.0 .0
enq: RO - fast object reus 18 0 0 11 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chain 2,511 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 195 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 12 0 0 8 0.0 .0
PX qref latch 54 100 0 2 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from cli 995 0 0 0 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from dbl 300 0 0 0 0.0 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100 0 56 0.0 .0
library cache: mutex X 244 0 0 0 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Signal ACK RSG 124 0 0 0 0.0 .0
undo segment extension 6 100 0 7 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Signal ACK EXT 124 0 0 0 0.0 .0
library cache load lock 3 0 0 9 0.0 .0
ADR block file write 45 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 12 0 0 2 0.0 .0
reliable message 28 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS operation: query 72 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: row cache objects 14 0 0 1 0.0 .0
enq: SQ - contention 17 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch free 32 0 0 0 0.0 .0
buffer busy waits 52 0 0 0 0.0 .0
enq: PS - contention 16 0 0 0 0.0 .0
enq: TX - row lock content 6 0 0 1 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message to dblink 1,018 0 0 0 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S 23 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers lru c 8 0 0 0 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message from clien 1,923,970 0 944,508 491 14.7
jobq slave wait 66,732 100 33,334 500 0.5
Streams AQ: waiting for me 6,481 100 32,412 5001 0.0
wait for unread message on 32,858 98 32,411 986 0.3
PX Deq: Execution Msg 1,448 0 190 131 0.0
PX Deq: Execute Reply 1,196 0 74 62 0.0
HS message to agent 228 0 4 19 0.0
single-task message 42 0 4 97 0.0
PX Deq Credit: send blkd 904 0 2 3 0.0
PX Deq Credit: need buffer 205 0 1 3 0.0
Foreground Wait Events
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
PX Deq: Table Q Normal 4,291 0 1 0 0.0
PX Deq: Join ACK 124 0 0 1 0.0
PX Deq: Parse Reply 124 0 0 0 0.0
KSV master wait 256 0 0 0 0.0
Latch Miss Sources
-> only latches with sleeps are shown
-> ordered by name, sleeps desc
NoWait Waiter
Latch Name Where Misses Sleeps Sleeps
ASM map operation freeli kffmTranslate2 0 2 0
DML lock allocation ktadmc 0 2 0
FOB s.o list latch ksfd_allfob 0 2 2
In memory undo latch ktiFlushMe 0 5 0
In memory undo latch ktichg: child 0 3 0
PC and Classifier lists No latch 0 6 0
Real-time plan statistic keswxAddNewPlanEntry 0 20 20
SQL memory manager worka qesmmIRegisterWorkArea:1 0 1 1
active service list kswslogon: session logout 0 23 12
active service list kswssetsvc: PX session swi 0 6 1
active service list kswsite: service iterator 0 1 0
archive process latch kcrrgpll 0 3 3
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr_2 0 1,746 573
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path (cr pin 0 1,024 2,126
cache buffers chains kcbgcur_2 0 60 8
cache buffers chains kcbchg1: kslbegin: bufs no 0 16 3
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path 0 14 20
cache buffers chains kcbzibmlt: multi-block rea 0 10 0
cache buffers chains kcbrls_2 0 9 53
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: kslbegin shared 0 8 1
cache buffers chains kcbrls_1 0 7 84
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: kslbegin excl 0 6 14
cache buffers chains kcbnew: new latch again 0 6 0
cache buffers chains kcbzgb: scan from tail. no 0 6 0
cache buffers chains kcbzwb 0 5 8
cache buffers chains kcbgcur: fast path (shr) 0 3 0
cache buffers chains kcbget: pin buffer 0 3 0
cache buffers chains kcbzhngcbk2_1 0 1 0
cache buffers lru chain kcbzgws 0 19 0
cache buffers lru chain kcbo_link_q 0 3 0
call allocation ksuxds 0 14 10
call allocation ksudlp: top call 0 2 3
enqueue hash chains ksqgtl3 0 2 1
enqueue hash chains ksqrcl 0 1 2
enqueues ksqgel: create enqueue 0 1 0
object queue header oper kcbo_unlink_q 0 5 2
object queue header oper kcbo_sw_buf 0 2 0
object queue header oper kcbo_link_q 0 1 2
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_cq 0 1 2
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_mq_bg 0 1 4
parallel query alloc buf kxfpbalo 0 1 1
process allocation ksucrp:1 0 2 0
process queue reference kxfpqrsnd 0 1 0
qmn task queue latch kwqmnmvtsks: delay to read 0 1 0
redo allocation kcrfw_redo_gen: redo alloc 0 17 0
row cache objects kqreqd: reget 0 6 0
row cache objects kqrpre: find obj 0 6 13
row cache objects kqrso 0 2 0
row cache objects kqreqd 0 1 2
row cache objects kqrpre: init complete 0 1 1
shared pool kghalo 0 199 106
shared pool kghupr1 0 39 109
shared pool kghfre 0 18 19
shared pool kghalp 0 7 29
space background task la ktsj_grab_task 0 21 27
Mutex Sleep Summary
-> ordered by number of sleeps desc
Wait
Mutex Type Location Sleeps Time (ms)
Library Cache kglhdgn2 106 338 12
Library Cache kgllkc1 57 259 10
Library Cache kgllkdl1 85 123 21
Cursor Pin kkslce [KKSCHLPIN2] 70 286
Library Cache kglget2 2 31 1
Library Cache kglhdgn1 62 31 2
Library Cache kglpin1 4 26 1
Library Cache kglpnal1 90 18 0
Library Cache kglpndl1 95 15 2
Library Cache kgllldl2 112 6 0
Library Cache kglini1 32 1 0
-------------------------------------------------------------Thanks in advance.Hi,
Thanks for reply.
I provided one hour report.
Inst Num Startup Time Release RAC
1 27-Feb-12 09:03 11.2.0.2.0 NO
Platform CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
Linux x86 64-bit 8 8 8 48.00
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 5606 29-Feb-12 04:00:35 63 3.7
End Snap: 5607 29-Feb-12 05:00:41 63 3.6
Elapsed: 60.11 (mins)
DB Time: 382.67 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 1,952M 1,952M Std Block Size: 16K
Shared Pool Size: 1,024M 1,024M Log Buffer: 18,868K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s): 6.4 0.8 0.03 0.03
DB CPU(s): 1.0 0.1 0.00 0.00
Redo size: 84,539.3 10,425.6
Logical reads: 23,345.6 2,879.1
Block changes: 386.5 47.7
Physical reads: 1,605.0 197.9
Physical writes: 7.1 0.9
User calls: 233.9 28.9
Parses: 4.0 0.5
Hard parses: 0.1 0.0
W/A MB processed: 0.1 0.0
Logons: 0.1 0.0
Executes: 210.9 26.0
Rollbacks: 0.0 0.0
Transactions: 8.1
Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 99.62 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 95.57 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 99.90 Soft Parse %: 98.68
Execute to Parse %: 98.10 Latch Hit %: 99.99
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 32.08 % Non-Parse CPU: 99.90
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 89.25 89.45
% SQL with executions>1: 96.79 97.52
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 95.67 96.56
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
db file sequential read 3,054,464 17,002 6 74.0 User I/O
DB CPU 3,748 16.3
read by other session 199,603 796 4 3.5 User I/O
direct path read 46,301 439 9 1.9 User I/O
db file scattered read 21,113 269 13 1.2 User I/O
Host CPU (CPUs: 8 Cores: 8 Sockets: 8)
~~~~~~~~ Load Average
Begin End %User %System %WIO %Idle
1.45 1.67 13.2 0.6 15.8 86.2
Instance CPU
~~~~~~~~~~~~
% of total CPU for Instance: 13.0
% of busy CPU for Instance: 94.7
%DB time waiting for CPU - Resource Mgr: 0.0
Memory Statistics
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Begin End
Host Mem (MB): 49,152.0 49,152.0
SGA use (MB): 3,072.0 3,072.0
PGA use (MB): 513.5 467.7
% Host Mem used for SGA+PGA: 7.29 7.20
Time Model Statistics
-> Total time in database user-calls (DB Time): 22960.5s
-> Statistics including the word "background" measure background process
time, and so do not contribute to the DB time statistic
-> Ordered by % or DB time desc, Statistic name
Statistic Name Time (s) % of DB Time
sql execute elapsed time 22,835.9 99.5
DB CPU 3,748.4 16.3
parse time elapsed 15.4 .1
hard parse elapsed time 14.3 .1
PL/SQL execution elapsed time 7.5 .0
PL/SQL compilation elapsed time 6.0 .0
connection management call elapsed time 1.6 .0
sequence load elapsed time 0.4 .0
hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time 0.0 .0
repeated bind elapsed time 0.0 .0
failed parse elapsed time 0.0 .0
DB time 22,960.5
background elapsed time 238.1
background cpu time 4.9
Operating System Statistics
-> *TIME statistic values are diffed.
All others display actual values. End Value is displayed if different
-> ordered by statistic type (CPU Use, Virtual Memory, Hardware Config), Name
Statistic Value End Value
BUSY_TIME 396,506
IDLE_TIME 2,483,725
IOWAIT_TIME 455,495
NICE_TIME 0
SYS_TIME 16,163
USER_TIME 380,052
LOAD 1 2
RSRC_MGR_CPU_WAIT_TIME 0
VM_IN_BYTES 95,646,943,232
VM_OUT_BYTES 1,686,059,008
PHYSICAL_MEMORY_BYTES 51,539,607,552
NUM_CPUS 8
NUM_CPU_CORES 8
NUM_CPU_SOCKETS 8
GLOBAL_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
GLOBAL_SEND_SIZE_MAX 1,048,586
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_DEFAULT 87,380
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MIN 4,096
TCP_SEND_SIZE_DEFAULT 16,384
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MIN 4,096
Operating System Statistics -
Snap Time Load %busy %user %sys %idle %iowait
29-Feb 04:00:35 1.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
29-Feb 05:00:41 1.7 13.8 13.2 0.6 86.2 15.8
Foreground Wait Class
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
-> Captured Time accounts for 97.6% of Total DB time 22,960.46 (s)
-> Total FG Wait Time: 18,651.75 (s) DB CPU time: 3,748.35 (s)
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait
Wait Class Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) %DB time
User I/O 3,327,253 0 18,576 6 80.9
DB CPU 3,748 16.3
Commit 23,882 0 69 3 0.3
System I/O 1,035 0 3 3 0.0
Network 842,393 0 2 0 0.0
Other 10,120 99 0 0 0.0
Configuration 3 0 0 58 0.0
Application 264 0 0 1 0.0
Concurrency 1,482 0 0 0 0.0
Foreground Wait Events
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
db file sequential read 3,054,464 0 17,002 6 104.5 74.0
read by other session 199,603 0 796 4 6.8 3.5
direct path read 46,301 0 439 9 1.6 1.9
db file scattered read 21,113 0 269 13 0.7 1.2
log file sync 23,882 0 69 3 0.8 .3
db file parallel read 4,727 0 68 14 0.2 .3
control file sequential re 1,035 0 3 3 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message to client 840,792 0 2 0 28.8 .0
direct path read temp 95 0 2 18 0.0 .0
local write wait 79 0 0 4 0.0 .0
Disk file operations I/O 870 0 0 0 0.0 .0
ASM file metadata operatio 4 0 0 50 0.0 .0
log file switch (private s 3 0 0 58 0.0 .0
ADR block file read 36 0 0 3 0.0 .0
enq: RO - fast object reus 5 0 0 16 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chain 1,465 0 0 0 0.1 .0
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 256 0 0 0 0.0 .0
asynch descriptor resize 10,059 100 0 0 0.3 .0
SQL*Net more data to clien 1,510 0 0 0 0.1 .0
enq: KO - fast object chec 3 0 0 8 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from cli 91 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 14 0 0 0 0.0 .0
ADR block file write 5 0 0 1 0.0 .0
reliable message 8 0 0 0 0.0 .0
direct path write temp 1 0 0 2 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message from clien 840,794 0 68,885 82 28.8
jobq slave wait 7,365 100 3,679 499 0.3
Streams AQ: waiting for me 721 100 3,605 5000 0.0
wait for unread message on 3,648 98 3,603 988 0.1
KSV master wait 20 0 0 0 0.0
Background Wait Events
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
log file parallel write 29,353 0 83 3 1.0 34.8
db file parallel write 5,753 0 17 3 0.2 6.9
db file sequential read 1,638 0 15 9 0.1 6.1
control file sequential re 5,142 0 13 2 0.2 5.4
os thread startup 140 0 8 58 0.0 3.4
control file parallel writ 1,440 0 8 6 0.0 3.4
log file sequential read 304 0 8 26 0.0 3.3
db file scattered read 214 0 2 9 0.0 .8
ASM file metadata operatio 1,199 0 1 1 0.0 .3
direct path write 35 0 0 6 0.0 .1
direct path read 41 0 0 5 0.0 .1
kfk: async disk IO 6 0 0 9 0.0 .0
Disk file operations I/O 1,266 0 0 0 0.0 .0
ADR block file read 16 0 0 2 0.0 .0
read by other session 3 0 0 8 0.0 .0
Log archive I/O 2 0 0 10 0.0 .0
log file sync 3 0 0 5 0.0 .0
asynch descriptor resize 341 100 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 1 0 0 6 0.0 .0
log file single write 4 0 0 1 0.0 .0
latch: redo allocation 3 0 0 1 0.0 .0
ADR block file write 5 0 0 1 0.0 .0
LGWR wait for redo copy 45 0 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS operation: query 6 0 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 1 0 0 1 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message to client 420 0 0 0 0.0 .0
rdbms ipc message 47,816 39 61,046 1277 1.6
DIAG idle wait 7,200 100 7,200 1000 0.2
Space Manager: slave idle 1,146 98 5,674 4951 0.0
class slave wait 284 0 3,983 14026 0.0
dispatcher timer 61 100 3,660 60006 0.0
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 258 50 3,613 14003 0.0
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 130 0 3,613 27789 0.0
Streams AQ: waiting for ti 7 71 3,608 515430 0.0
wait for unread message on 3,605 100 3,606 1000 0.1
pmon timer 1,201 100 3,604 3001 0.0
smon timer 15 73 3,603 240207 0.0
ASM background timer 754 0 3,602 4777 0.0
shared server idle wait 120 100 3,601 30006 0.0
SQL*Net message from clien 554 0 4 7 0.0
KSV master wait 101 0 0 2 0.0
Wait Event Histogram
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
% of Waits
Total
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
ADR block file read 52 73.1 1.9 9.6 13.5 1.9
ADR block file write 10 100.0
ADR file lock 12 100.0
ARCH wait for archivelog l 3 100.0
ASM file metadata operatio 1203 97.3 .5 .7 .3 .2 .9
CSS initialization 1 100.0
CSS operation: action 1 100.0
CSS operation: query 6 83.3 16.7
Disk file operations I/O 2118 95.4 4.5 .1
LGWR wait for redo copy 45 100.0
Log archive I/O 2 100.0
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 256 99.6 .4
SQL*Net message to client 839.9 100.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from cli 91 100.0
SQL*Net more data to clien 1503 100.0
asynch descriptor resize 10.4K 100.0
buffer busy waits 2 100.0
control file parallel writ 1440 5.7 35.1 24.0 16.3 12.0 5.5 1.5
control file sequential re 6177 69.4 7.5 5.9 8.1 7.1 1.7 .3
db file parallel read 4727 1.7 3.2 3.2 10.1 46.6 33.3 1.8
db file parallel write 5755 42.3 21.3 18.6 11.2 4.6 1.4 .5
db file scattered read 21.5K 8.4 4.3 11.9 18.9 26.3 25.3 4.9
db file sequential read 3053. 28.7 15.1 11.1 17.9 21.5 5.4 .3 .0
direct path read 46.3K 9.9 8.8 18.5 21.7 22.8 15.7 2.7
direct path read temp 95 9.5 9.5 23.2 49.5 8.4
direct path write 35 11.4 31.4 17.1 22.9 11.4 2.9 2.9
direct path write temp 1 100.0
enq: KO - fast object chec 3 66.7 33.3
enq: RO - fast object reus 5 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
kfk: async disk IO 6 50.0 16.7 16.7 16.7
latch free 3 100.0
latch: cache buffers chain 1465 100.0
latch: cache buffers lru c 1 100.0
latch: object queue header 2 100.0
latch: redo allocation 3 33.3 33.3 33.3
latch: row cache objects 2 100.0
latch: shared pool 15 93.3 6.7
local write wait 79 35.4 34.2 21.5 8.9
log file parallel write 29.4K 47.8 21.7 11.9 9.9 6.8 1.6 .3
log file sequential read 304 6.3 3.0 3.6 10.2 23.4 24.3 29.3
log file single write 4 25.0 75.0
log file switch (private s 3 100.0
log file sync 23.9K 40.9 28.0 12.9 9.7 6.7 1.5 .3
os thread startup 140 100.0
read by other session 199.6 37.1 19.9 12.9 13.1 13.8 3.1 .2
reliable message 8 100.0
ASM background timer 755 2.9 .4 .1 .1 .3 .1 .3 95.8
DIAG idle wait 7196 100.0
KSV master wait 121 88.4 2.5 3.3 2.5 .8 .8 1.7
SQL*Net message from clien 840.1 97.1 1.8 .5 .2 .2 .1 .0 .1
Space Manager: slave idle 1147 .1 .5 99.4
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 258 49.6 .4 50.0
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 130 .8 99.2
Streams AQ: waiting for me 721 100.0
Streams AQ: waiting for ti 7 28.6 42.9 28.6
class slave wait 283 39.9 2.5 2.5 3.5 4.9 9.2 15.2 22.3
dispatcher timer 60 100.0
jobq slave wait 7360 .0 .0 .0 99.9
pmon timer 1201 100.0
rdbms ipc message 47.8K 2.7 31.6 17.4 1.1 1.1 .9 20.9 24.3
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: I2KPROD/I2KPROD Snaps: 5606-5607
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
% of Waits
Total
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
shared server idle wait 120 100.0
smon timer 16 6.3 93.8
wait for unread message on 7250 .1 99.9
Latch Miss Sources
-> only latches with sleeps are shown
-> ordered by name, sleeps desc
NoWait Waiter
Latch Name Where Misses Sleeps Sleeps
In memory undo latch ktichg: child 0 1 0
active service list kswslogon: session logout 0 2 0
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr_2 0 1,123 483
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path (cr pin 0 496 1,131
cache buffers chains kcbrls_2 0 5 6
cache buffers chains kcbgcur_2 0 4 0
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path 0 3 1
cache buffers chains kcbzwb 0 2 4
cache buffers chains kcbchg1: kslbegin: bufs no 0 1 0
cache buffers chains kcbnew: new latch again 0 1 0
cache buffers chains kcbrls_1 0 1 6
cache buffers chains kcbzgb: scan from tail. no 0 1 0
cache buffers lru chain kcbzgws 0 1 0
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_cq 0 1 0
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_mq_bg 0 1 2
redo allocation kcrfw_redo_gen: redo alloc 0 3 0
row cache objects kqrpre: find obj 0 1 1
row cache objects kqrso 0 1 0
shared pool kghalo 0 13 3
shared pool kghupr1 0 4 15
shared pool kghalp 0 1 0
space background task la ktsj_grab_task 0 2 2
------------------------------------------------------------- -
Oracle 9i reading BLOB performance issues
Windows XP Pro SP2
JDK 1.5.0_05
Oracle 9i
Oracle Thin Driver for JDK 1.4 v.10.2.0.1.0
DBCP v.1.2.1
Spring v1.2.7 (I am using the JDBC template for convenience)
I have run into serious performance issues reading BLOBs from Oracle using oracle's JDBC thin driver. I am not sure if it a constraint/mis-configuration with oracle or a JDBC problem.
I am hoping that someone has some experience accessing multi-MB BLOBs under heavy volume.
We are considering using Oracle 8 or 9 as a document repository. It will end up storing hundreds of thousands of PDFs that can be as large as 30 MBs. We don't have access to Oracle 10.
TESTS
I am running tests against Oracle 8 and 9 to simulate single and multi-threaded document access. Out goal is to get a sense of KBps throughput and BLOB data access contention.
DATA
There is a single test table with 100 rows. Each row has a PK id and a BLOB field. The blobs range in size from a few dozen KB to 12MB. They represent a valid sample of production data. The total data size is approx. 121 MBs.
Single Threaded Test
The test selects a single blob object at a time and then reads the contents of the blob's binary input stream in 2 KB chunks. At the end of the test, it will have accessed all 100 blobs and streamed all 121 MBs. The test harness is JUnit.
8i Results: On 8i it starts and terminates successfully on a steady and reliable basis. The throughput hovers around 4.8 MBps.
9i Results: Similar reliability to 8i. The throughput is about 30% better.
Multi-Threaded Test
The multi-threaded test uses the same "blob reader" functionality used in the single threaded test. However, it spawns 8 threads each running a separate "blob reader".
8i Results: The tests successfully complete on a reliable basis. The aggregate throughput of all 8 threads is a bit more than 4.8 MBps.
9i Results: Erratic. The tests were highly erratic on 9i. Threads would intermittently lock when accessing a BLOB's output stream. Sometimes they lock accessing data from the same row, othertimes it is distinct rows. The number and the timing of the thread "locks" is indeterminate. When the test completed successfully the aggregate throughput of the 8 threads was approx. 5.4 MBps.
I would be more than happy to post code or the data model if that would help.
CarlosHi Murphy16,
Try investigate where are the principal issues in your RAC system.
Check:
* Expensive SQL's;
* Sorts in disks;
* Wait Events;
* Interconnect hardware issues;
* Applications doing unnecessary manual LOCKs (SQL);
* If SGA is adequatly sized (take care to not use of SWAP space "DISK");
* Backup's and unnecessary jobs running at business time (Realocate this jobs and backups to night window or a less intensive work hour at database);
* Rebuild indexes and identify tables that must be reorganized (fragmentation);
* Verify another software consuming resources on your server;
Please give us more info about your environment. The steps above are general, but you can use to guide u in basic performance issues.
Regards,
Rodrigo Mufalani
http://mufalani.blogspot.com -
Creating datafile performance issues
Hi guys,
I´m using a oracle rac 10g with 3 nodes, and i needed do create a new datafile in production environment, then i had some performance issues, do you guys have any idea what the cause of this ?
CREATE TABLESPACE "TBS_TDE_CMS_DATA"
DATAFILE
'+RDATA' SIZE 1000M REUSE AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 1000M MAXSIZE 30000M
LOGGING EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO;
Any hint would be helpful.
thanks.BrunoSales wrote:
Hi guys,
I´m using a oracle rac 10g with 3 nodes, and i needed do create a new datafile in production environment, then i had some performance issues, do you guys have any idea what the cause of this ?
CREATE TABLESPACE "TBS_TDE_CMS_DATA"
DATAFILE
'+RDATA' SIZE 1000M REUSE AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 1000M MAXSIZE 30000M
LOGGING EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO;
Any hint would be helpful.
thanks.why are creating 1GB of initial extent? I think is too big. Remember whenever you add datafile to database, oracle first formats the complete datafile. So doing this can have performance issue as it depends upon the datafile size. check if you face any issue in I/O or check if there are any spikes in I/O.
You can try adding a datafile with default values and check how much time it take -
Performance issues while query data from a table having large records
Hi all,
I have a performance issues on the queries on mtl_transaction_accounts table which has around 48,000,000 rows. One of the query is as below
SQL ID: 98pqcjwuhf0y6 Plan Hash: 3227911261
SELECT SUM (B.BASE_TRANSACTION_VALUE)
FROM
MTL_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS B , MTL_PARAMETERS A
WHERE A.ORGANIZATION_ID = B.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND A.ORGANIZATION_ID = :b1
AND B.REFERENCE_ACCOUNT = A.MATERIAL_ACCOUNT
AND B.TRANSACTION_DATE <= LAST_DAY (TO_DATE (:b2 , 'MON-YY' ) )
AND B.ACCOUNTING_LINE_TYPE != 15
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 3 0.02 0.05 0 0 0 0
Fetch 3 134.74 722.82 847951 1003824 0 2
total 7 134.76 722.87 847951 1003824 0 2
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 2
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 193 (APPS)
Number of plan statistics captured: 1
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
1 1 1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=469496 pr=397503 pw=0 time=237575841 us)
788242 788242 788242 NESTED LOOPS (cr=469496 pr=397503 pw=0 time=337519154 us cost=644 size=5920 card=160)
1 1 1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID MTL_PARAMETERS (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=59 us cost=1 size=10 card=1)
1 1 1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN MTL_PARAMETERS_U1 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=40 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 181399)
788242 788242 788242 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID MTL_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS (cr=469494 pr=397503 pw=0 time=336447304 us cost=643 size=4320 card=160)
8704356 8704356 8704356 INDEX RANGE SCAN MTL_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS_N3 (cr=28826 pr=28826 pw=0 time=27109752 us cost=28 size=0 card=7316)(object id 181802)
Rows Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT MODE: ALL_ROWS
1 SORT (AGGREGATE)
788242 NESTED LOOPS
1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF
'MTL_PARAMETERS' (TABLE)
1 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF
'MTL_PARAMETERS_U1' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
788242 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF
'MTL_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS' (TABLE)
8704356 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF
'MTL_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS_N3' (INDEX)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
row cache lock 29 0.00 0.02
SQL*Net message to client 2 0.00 0.00
db file sequential read 847951 0.40 581.90
latch: object queue header operation 3 0.00 0.00
latch: gc element 14 0.00 0.00
gc cr grant 2-way 3 0.00 0.00
latch: gcs resource hash 1 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 2 0.00 0.00
gc current block 3-way 1 0.00 0.00
********************************************************************************On a 5 node rac environment the program completes in 15 hours whereas on a single node environemnt the program completes in 2 hours.
Is there any way I can improve the performance of this query?
Regards
Edited by: mhosur on Dec 10, 2012 2:41 AM
Edited by: mhosur on Dec 10, 2012 2:59 AM
Edited by: mhosur on Dec 11, 2012 10:32 PMCREATE INDEX mtl_transaction_accounts_n0
ON mtl_transaction_accounts (
transaction_date
, organization_id
, reference_account
, accounting_line_type
/:p -
Performance Issue with sql query
Hi,
My db is 10.2.0.5 with RAC on ASM, Cluster ware version 10.2.0.5.
With bsoa table as
SQL> desc bsoa;
Name Null? Type
ID NOT NULL NUMBER
LOGIN_TIME DATE
LOGOUT_TIME DATE
SUCCESSFUL_IND VARCHAR2(1)
WORK_STATION_NAME VARCHAR2(80)
OS_USER VARCHAR2(30)
USER_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
FORM_ID NUMBER
AUDIT_TRAIL_NO NUMBER
CREATED_BY VARCHAR2(30)
CREATION_DATE DATE
LAST_UPDATED_BY VARCHAR2(30)
LAST_UPDATE_DATE DATE
SITE_NO NUMBER
SESSION_ID NUMBER(8)
The query
UPDATE BSOA SET LOGOUT_TIME =SYSDATE WHERE SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV', 'SESSIONID') = SESSION_ID
Is taking a lot of time to execute and in AWR reports also it is on top in
1. SQL Order by elapsed time
2. SQL order by reads
3. SQL order by gets
So i am trying a way to solve the performance issue as the application is slow specially during login and logout time.
I understand that the function in the where condition cause to do FTS, but i can not think what other parts to look at.
Also:
SQL> SELECT COUNT(1) FROM BSOA;
COUNT(1)
7800373
The explain plan for "UPDATE BSOA SET LOGOUT_TIME =SYSDATE WHERE SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV', 'SESSIONID') = SESSION_ID" is
{code}
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1184960901
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | 1 | 26 | 18748 (3)| 00:03:45 |
| 1 | UPDATE | BSOA | | | | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| BSOA | 1 | 26 | 18748 (3)| 00:03:45 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter("SESSION_ID"=TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','SESSIONID')))
{code}Hi,
There are also triggers before update and AUDITS on this table.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER B2.TRIGGER1
BEFORE UPDATE
ON B2.BSOA REFERENCING OLD AS OLD NEW AS NEW
FOR EACH ROW
:NEW.LAST_UPDATED_BY := USER ;
:NEW.LAST_UPDATE_DATE := SYSDATE ;
END;
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER B2.TRIGGER2
BEFORE INSERT
ON B2.BSOA REFERENCING OLD AS OLD NEW AS NEW
FOR EACH ROW
:NEW.CREATED_BY := USER ;
:NEW.CREATION_DATE := SYSDATE ;
:NEW.LAST_UPDATED_BY := USER ;
:NEW.LAST_UPDATE_DATE := SYSDATE ;
END;
And also there is an audit on this table
AUDIT UPDATE ON B2.BSOA BY ACCESS WHENEVER SUCCESSFUL;
AUDIT UPDATE ON B2.BSOA BY ACCESS WHENEVER NOT SUCCESSFUL;
And the sessionid column in BSOA has height balanced histogram.
When i create an index i get the following error. As i am on 10g I can't use DDL_LOCK_TIMEOUT . I may have to wait for next down time.
SQL> CREATE INDEX B2.BSOA_SESSID_I ON B2.BSOA(SESSION_ID) TABLESPACE B2 COMPUTE STATISTICS;
CREATE INDEX B2.BSOA_SESSID_I ON B2.BSOA(SESSION_ID) TABLESPACE B2 COMPUTE STATISTICS
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
Thanks -
Synchronized Block - Performance Issue
Hi All,
In my java class contains lot of synchronized methods...which in turn leads to performance issue....
If i try to remove the synchronized methods...it leads to deadlock problem...
Is there a way without removing the synchronized methods..to improve the performance...
Please suggest any solutionIn my java class contains lot of synchronized methods...which in turn leads to performance issue....It causes sequentialization of critical sections of code so that they will execute correctly. You can't describe that as a performance problem unless you can show that a faster and correct implementation exists. It might: for example you could make yor synchronized blocks smaller, use concurrent data structures, etc. But what you can't do is compare it to the same code without synchronization and say it's slower. It is, but the observation has no meaning as the unsynch version isn't correct.
If i try to remove the synchronized methods...it leads to deadlock problem...That isn't possible unless you didn't remove them all. Deadlocks result from acquiring locks in different orders.
Is there a way without removing the synchronized methods..to improve the performance...Almost certainly. Post some code. -
Report Performance Issue - Activity
Hi gurus,
I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
<Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
any input is really appriciated
Thanks in advanced,
FinaFina,
Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
Hopefully, this is helping. -
Report performance Issue in BI Answers
Hi All,
We have a performance issues with reports. Report is running more than 10 mins. we took query from the session log and ran it in database, at that time it took not more than 2 mins. We have verified proper indexes on the where clause columns.
Could any once suggest to improve the performance in BI answers?
Thanks in advance,I hope you dont have many case statements and complex calculations that you do in the Answers.
Next thing you need to monitor is how many rows of data that you are trying to retrieve from the query. If the volume is huge then it takes time to do the formatting on the Answers as you are going to dump huge volumes of data. Database(like teradata) returns initially like 1-2000 records if you hit show all records then even db is gonna fair amount of time if you are dumping many records
hope it helps
thanks
Prash -
BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue
Hi Masters,
I am working out for a solution for BW report developed in 0bcs_vc10 virtual cube.
Some of the querys is taking more 15 to 20 minutes to execute the report.
This is huge performance issue. We are using BW 3.5, and report devloped in bex and published thru portal. Any one faced similar problem please advise how you tackle this issue. Please give the detail analysis approach how you resolved this issue.
Current service pack we are using is
SAP_BW 350 0016 SAPKW35016
FINBASIS 300 0012 SAPK-30012INFINBASIS
BI_CONT 353 0008 SAPKIBIFP8
SEM-BW 400 0012 SAPKGS4012
Best of Luck
Chris
BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issueRavi,
I already did that, it is not helping me much for the performance. Reports are taking 15 t0 20 minutes. I wanted any body in this forum have the same issue how
they resolved it.
Regards,
Chris -
Interested by performance issue ? Read this ! If you can explain, you're a master Jedi !
This is the question we will try to answer...
What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
First of all, describe my computer...
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
CPU
Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
RAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
Motherboard
EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
Graphics
PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
Hard Drives
16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
PSU
Cosair 1000 Watts
After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
CPU Introduction
I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it. I used Prime 95 to get the result. // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel. The CPU gives everything it can !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
(picture 1)
Disk Introduction
I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
(picture 2)
Now, I know my limits ! It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
PPBM5 (H.264) Result
I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down). Probably caused by (Encrypt time.... write.... Encrypt time.... write...) // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 39 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down) ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
(picture 3)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Buffering time.... write.... Buffering time.... write...) // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate ! Easy !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40.5 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
(picture 4)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5). It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller. Impossible ! Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage. CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%). // This kind of results let me REALLY confused. It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
(picture 5)
PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Encoding time.... write.... Encoding time.... write...) // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate ! Real Joke !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only. Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
(picture 6)
Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management. My hardware is idle ! I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ? My computer want, but the software not !
(picture 7)
Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects. CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
(picture 8)
Conclusion
There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually. GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card). Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance). I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU. I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
Premiere Pro, I'm speechless ! Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer. Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%. I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor. But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post. It's seem to be a bug...
Thank you.Patrick,
I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
Just my $ 0.02 -
Performance Issue for BI system
Hello,
We are facing performance issues for BI System. Its a preproductive system and its performance is degrading badly everyday. I was checking system came to know program buffer hit ratio is increaasing everyday due to high Swaps. So asked to change the parameter abap/buffersize which was 300Mb to 500Mb. But still no major improvement is found in the system.
There is 16GB Ram available and Server is HP-UX and with Netweaver2004s with Oracle 10.2.0.4.0 installed in it.
The Main problem is while running a report or creating a query is taking way too long time.
Kindly help me.Hello SIva,
Thanks for your reply but i have checked ST02 and ST03 and also SM50 and its normal
we are having 9 dialog processes, 3 Background , 2 Update and 1 spool.
No one is using the system currently but in ST02 i can see the swaps are in red.
Buffer HitRatio % Alloc. KB Freesp. KB % Free Sp. Dir. Size FreeDirEnt % Free Dir Swaps DB Accs
Nametab (NTAB) 0
Table definition 99,60 6.798 20.000 29.532 153.221
Field definition 99,82 31.562 784 2,61 20.000 6.222 31,11 17.246 41.248
Short NTAB 99,94 3.625 2.446 81,53 5.000 2.801 56,02 0 2.254
Initial records 73,95 6.625 998 16,63 5.000 690 13,80 40.069 49.528
0
boldprogram 97,66 300.000 1.074 0,38 75.000 67.177 89,57 219.665 725.703bold
CUA 99,75 3.000 875 36,29 1.500 1.401 93,40 55.277 2.497
Screen 99,80 4.297 1.365 33,35 2.000 1.811 90,55 119 3.214
Calendar 100,00 488 361 75,52 200 42 21,00 0 158
OTR 100,00 4.096 3.313 100,00 2.000 2.000 100,00 0
0
Tables 0
Generic Key 99,17 29.297 1.450 5,23 5.000 350 7,00 2.219 3.085.633
Single record 99,43 10.000 1.907 19,41 500 344 68,80 39 467.978
0
Export/import 82,75 4.096 43 1,30 2.000 662 33,10 137.208
Exp./ Imp. SHM 89,83 4.096 438 13,22 2.000 1.482 74,10 0
SAP Memory Curr.Use % CurUse[KB] MaxUse[KB] In Mem[KB] OnDisk[KB] SAPCurCach HitRatio %
Roll area 2,22 5.832 22.856 131.072 131.072 IDs 96,61
Page area 1,08 2.832 24.144 65.536 196.608 Statement 79,00
Extended memory 22,90 958.464 1.929.216 4.186.112 0 0,00
Heap memory 0 0 1.473.767 0 0,00
Call Stati HitRatio % ABAP/4 Req ABAP Fails DBTotCalls AvTime[ms] DBRowsAff.
Select single 88,59 63.073.369 5.817.659 4.322.263 0 57.255.710
Select 72,68 284.080.387 0 13.718.442 0 32.199.124
Insert 0,00 151.955 5.458 166.159 0 323.725
Update 0,00 378.161 97.884 395.814 0 486.880
Delete 0,00 389.398 332.619 415.562 0 244.495
Edited by: Srikanth Sunkara on May 12, 2011 11:50 AM -
RE: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte3M
Hi James,
Could you give me a call, I am at my desk.
I had meetings all day and couldn't respond to your calls earlier.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Min [mailto:jminbrio.forte.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:50 PM
To: Sharma, Sandeep; Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: sophiaforte.com; kenlforte.com; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte 3M
Hello,
I just want to reiterate that we are very committed to working on
this issue, and that our goal is to find out the root of the problem. But
first I'd like to narrow down the avenues by process of elimination.
Open Cursor is something that is commonly used in today's RDBMS. I
know that you must test your query in ISQL using some kind of execute
immediate, but Sybase should be able to handle an open cursor. I was
wondering if your Sybase expert commented on the fact that the server is
not responding to commonly used command like 'open cursor'. According to
our developer, we are merely following the API from Sybase, and open cursor
is not something that particularly slows down a query for several minutes
(except maybe the very first time). The logs show that Forte is waiting for
a status from the DB server. Actually, using prepared statements and open
cursor ends up being more efficient in the long run.
Some questions:
1) Have you tried to do a prepared statement with open cursor in your ISQL
session? If so, did it have the same slowness?
2) How big is the table you are querying? How many rows are there? How many
are returned?
3) When there is a hang in Forte, is there disk-spinning or CPU usage in
the database server side? On the Forte side? Absolutely no activity at all?
We actually have a Sybase set-up here, and if you wish, we could test out
your database and Forte PEX here. Since your queries seems to be running
off of only one table, this might be the best option, as we could look at
everything here, in house. To do this:
a) BCP out the data into a flat file. (character format to make it portable)
b) we need a script to create the table and indexes.
c) the Forte PEX file of the app to test this out.
d) the SQL staement that you issue in ISQL for comparison.
If the situation warrants, we can give a concrete example of
possible errors/bugs to a developer. Dial-in is still an option, but to be
able to look at the TOOL code, database setup, etc. without the limitations
of dial-up may be faster and more efficient. Please let me know if you can
provide this, as well as the answers to the above questions, or if you have
any questions.
Regards,
At 08:05 AM 3/30/00 -0500, Sharma, Sandeep wrote:
James, Ken:
FYI, see attached response from our Sybase expert, Dani Sasmita. She has
already tried what you suggested and results are enclosed.
++
Sandeep
-----Original Message-----
From: SASMITA, DANIAR
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:43 PM
To: Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: Sharma, Sandeep; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: FW: Case 59063: Select using LIKE has performance
issues
w/ CTLIB and Forte 3M
We did that trick already.
When it is hanging, I can see what is doing.
It is doing OPEN CURSOR. But not clear the exact statement of the cursor
it is trying to open.
When we run the query directly to Sybase, not using Forte, it is clearly
not opening any cursor.
And running it directly to Sybase many times, the response is always
consistently fast.
It is just when the query runs from Forte to Sybase, it opens a cursor.
But again, in the Forte code, Alex is not using any cursor.
In trying to capture the query,we even tried to audit any statementcoming
to Sybase. Same thing, just open cursor. No cursor declaration anywhere.==============================================
James Min
Technical Support Engineer - Forte Tools
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
1800 Harrison St., 17th Fl.
Oakland, CA 94612
james.minsun.com
510.869.2056
==============================================
Support Hotline: 510-451-5400
CUSTOMERS open a NEW CASE with Technical Support:
http://www.forte.com/support/case_entry.html
CUSTOMERS view your cases and enter follow-up transactions:
http://www.forte.com/support/view_calls.htmlEarthlink wrote:
Contrary to my understanding, the <font face="courier">with_pipeline</font> procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy <font face="courier">no_pipeline</font> procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
Like:
- a database version
- how did you test
- what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
and so on.
If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701 -
Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?
Thanks Kelly,
The answers would be the following:
1200 cells per custom section (NEW COUNT), and up to 30 custom sections per spec.
Assuming all will be populated, and this would apply to all final material specs in the system which could be ~25% of all material specs.
The cells will be numeric, free text, drop downs, and some calculated numeric.
Are we reaching the limits for UI performance?
Thanks -
Hello,
I encountered a serious performance bug in Adobe Air iOS application on devices running iOS 8.1 or later. Approximately in 1-2 minutes fps drops to 7 or lower without interacting with the app. This is very noticeable in the app. The app looks like frozen for about 0.5 seconds. The bug doesn't appear on every session.
Devices tested: iPad Mini iOS 8.1.1, iPhone 6 iOS 8.2. iPod Touch 4 iOS 6 is working correctly.
Air SDK versions: 15 and 17 tested.
I can track the bug using Adobe Scout. There is a noticeable spike on frame time 1.16. Framerate drops to 7.0. The App spends much time on function Runtime overhead. Sometimes the top activity is Running AS3 attached to frame or Waiting For Next Frame instead of Runtime overhead.
The bug can be reproduced on an empty application having a one bitmap on stage. Open the app and wait for two minutes and the bug should appear. If not, just close and relaunch the app.
Bugbase link: Bug#3965160 - iOS 8.1+ Performance Issue
Miska SavelaHi
Id already activated Messages and entered the 6 digit code I was presented with into my iPhone. I can receive txt messages from non iOS users on my iMac and can reply to those messages.
I just can't send a new message from scratch to a non iOS user :-s
Thanks
Baz
Maybe you are looking for
-
I started with a brand new iPhoto Library and I still can't get it to work.
I have almost 40,000 photos and iPhoto simply stopped working altogether. You can read all about my trials and tribulations here: http://www.davidgagne.net/2014/01/02/dealing-with-my-iphoto-library/ Eventually I simply resigned myself to not being ab
-
How to turn off standard warning?
Hi, I am hitting the warning below when I hit Check and Send button for one of the MSS service. "Event to start workflow for vacancy administration not triggered." I can actually continue to submit and complete the request without any issue. But I wo
-
Combined Stacked and side-by-side bar chart?
I need to create a chart where I for each group (x axis) have two bars where each bar has two stacked values. Is this possible to do? I found one method which seems to work and that is using the dual Y axis to group the values into two groups. Questi
-
ITunes questions...so confused.
I have an Ipod Nano-4 gig. When I plug it in to my mac and open itunes, I get this information: Capacity: 3.72 GB Version: 1.1.3 (updated, I know that much) and on the bottom, the little blue/orange thingie.. it says that I have 497.2 MB of Audio (wh
-
Airport issue after wake from sleep (lion)
With 10.6, this was not a problem. With Lion, very often after wake up from sleep mode, the system is unable to reconnect to my airport extreme base station. Killing the prefs in the library did not help. Any suggestions?