Creating datafile performance issues

Hi guys,
I´m using a oracle rac 10g with 3 nodes, and i needed do create a new datafile in production environment, then i had some performance issues, do you guys have any idea what the cause of this ?
CREATE TABLESPACE "TBS_TDE_CMS_DATA"
DATAFILE
'+RDATA' SIZE 1000M REUSE AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 1000M MAXSIZE 30000M
LOGGING EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO;
Any hint would be helpful.
thanks.

BrunoSales wrote:
Hi guys,
I´m using a oracle rac 10g with 3 nodes, and i needed do create a new datafile in production environment, then i had some performance issues, do you guys have any idea what the cause of this ?
CREATE TABLESPACE "TBS_TDE_CMS_DATA"
DATAFILE
'+RDATA' SIZE 1000M REUSE AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 1000M MAXSIZE 30000M
LOGGING EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO;
Any hint would be helpful.
thanks.why are creating 1GB of initial extent? I think is too big. Remember whenever you add datafile to database, oracle first formats the complete datafile. So doing this can have performance issue as it depends upon the datafile size. check if you face any issue in I/O or check if there are any spikes in I/O.
You can try adding a datafile with default values and check how much time it take

Similar Messages

Create Application performance issue

Hi Experts
Please help me
I have two same enviroment.
In one in which users are of native mode if I create a Essbase application it takes around 7 sec to create but in other where users are from MSAD and security is externalize, its taking around 3 minutes.
Database repository are same i.e on local machines
I see this message when I check SharedServices_Security_Client.log in my second enviorment:
com.hyperion.css.spi.impl.ldap.LDAPCacheUpdater.resolveCircularDependency(Unknown Source) - INFO: Time to resolve circular dependency on the Cache for provider: LDAP in millis is : 0
EAS 2008-09-12 01:00:40,716 [Thread-299] WARN com.hyperion.css.spi.impl.ldap.LDAPCacheUpdater.refreshProviderGroupCache(Unknown Source) - INFO: Time to build Cache for provider: LDAP in millis is : 3800
Enviroment Details:-
Product Version:- Hyperion Essabse 9.3.1
Plateform:- IBM AIX Based Systems (64-bit) version 5.3
Please suggest the possible cause and solution.
Thanks

Hi Experts
Please help me
I have two same enviroment.
In one in which users are of native mode if I create a Essbase application it takes around 7 sec to create but in other where users are from MSAD and security is externalize, its taking around 3 minutes.
Database repository are same i.e on local machines
I see this message when I check SharedServices_Security_Client.log in my second enviorment:
com.hyperion.css.spi.impl.ldap.LDAPCacheUpdater.resolveCircularDependency(Unknown Source) - INFO: Time to resolve circular dependency on the Cache for provider: LDAP in millis is : 0
EAS 2008-09-12 01:00:40,716 [Thread-299] WARN com.hyperion.css.spi.impl.ldap.LDAPCacheUpdater.refreshProviderGroupCache(Unknown Source) - INFO: Time to build Cache for provider: LDAP in millis is : 3800
Enviroment Details:-
Product Version:- Hyperion Essabse 9.3.1
Plateform:- IBM AIX Based Systems (64-bit) version 5.3
Please suggest the possible cause and solution.
Thanks

Performance Issue with RF Scanners after SAP Enhancement Pack 5 Upgrade

We are on component version SAP ECC 6.0, and recently upgraded to Enhancement Pack 5. I believe we are on Net Weaver 7.10, and using RF scanners in one plant that is Warehouse Managed. Evidentially when we moved to EHP5, the Web SAP Console went away and we are left with ITS Mobile. This has created several issues and continues to be a performance barrier for the forklift drivers in the warehouse. We see there is a high use of java script, and the processors canu2019t handle this. When we login to tcode LM00, on a laptop or desktop computer, there are no performance issues. When we login to tcode LM00, with the RF scanners, the system is very slow. It might take 30 seconds to confirm one item on a WM Transfer Order.
1.) Can we revert back to Web SAP Console, after we have upgraded to EHP5?
2.) What is creating the performance issues with the RF Scanners now that we switched over to SAP ITS mobile?
Our RF Scanners are made by Intermec, but I donu2019t think that is where the solution lies. One person in our IT Operations has spent a good deal of time configuring SAPITS to get it to work, but still it isnu2019t performing.

Tom,
I am sorry I did not see this earlier.
I'm currently working on a very similar project with ITS mobile and the problem is to accurately determine the root cause of the problem in the least amount of time. The tool that works is found here: http://www.connectrf.com/index.php/mcm/managed-diagnostics/
Isolating the network from the application and the device is a time consuming process unless you have a piece of software that can trace the HTTP transaction between host and device on both wired and wireless side of the network. Once that is achieved (as with Connect's tool) you can then you can begin to solve the problem.
What I found in my project is that the amount of data traffic generated by ITS mobile can be reduced drastically, which speeds the response time of the mobile devices, especially with large number of devices in distribution centers.
Let me know if I can answer more questions related to this topic.
Cheers,
Shari

Performance issues when creating a Report / Query in Discoverer

Hi forum,
Hope you are can help, it involves a performance issues when creating a Report / Query.
I have a Discoverer Report that currently takes less than 5 seconds to run. After I add a condition to bring back Batch Status that = Posted we cancelled the query after reaching 20 minutes as this is way too long. If I remove the condition the query time goes back to less than 5 seconds.
Please see attached the SQL Inspector Plan:
Before Condition
SELECT STATEMENT
SORT GROUP BY
VIEW SYS
SORT GROUP BY
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
AND-EQUAL
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N2
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_N1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
After Condition
SELECT STATEMENT
SORT GROUP BY
VIEW SYS
SORT GROUP BY
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
TABLE ACCESS FULL GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_N1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
Is there anything i can do in Discoverer Desktop / Administration to avoid this problem.
Many thanks,
Lance

Hi Rod,
I've tried the condition (Batch Status||'' = 'Posted') as you suggested, but the qeury time is still over 20 mins. To test i changed it to (Batch Status||'' = 'Unposted') and the query was returned within seconds again.
Ive been doing some more digging and have found the database view that is linked to the Journal Batches folder. See below.
I think the problem is with the column using DECODE. When querying the column in TOAD the value of P is returned. But in discoverer the condition is done on the value Posted. Im not too sure how DECODE works, but think this could be the causing some sort of issue with Full Table Scans. How do we get around this?
Lance
DECODE( JOURNAL_BATCH1.STATUS,
'+', 'Unable to validate or create CTA',
'+*', 'Was unable to validate or create CTA',
'-','Invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
'-*', 'Modified invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
'<', 'Showing sequence assignment failure',
'<*', 'Was showing sequence assignment failure',
'>', 'Showing cutoff rule violation',
'>*', 'Was showing cutoff rule violation',
'A', 'Journal batch failed funds reservation',
'A*', 'Journal batch previously failed funds reservation',
'AU', 'Showing batch with unopened period',
'B', 'Showing batch control total violation',
'B*', 'Was showing batch control total violation',
'BF', 'Showing batch with frozen or inactive budget',
'BU', 'Showing batch with unopened budget year',
'C', 'Showing unopened reporting period',
'C*', 'Was showing unopened reporting period',
'D', 'Selected for posting to an unopened period',
'D*', 'Was selected for posting to an unopened period',
'E', 'Showing no journal entries for this batch',
'E*', 'Was showing no journal entries for this batch',
'EU', 'Showing batch with unopened encumbrance year',
'F', 'Showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
'F*', 'Was showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
'G', 'Showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
'G*', 'Was showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
'H', 'Showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
'H*', 'Was showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
'I', 'In the process of being posted',
'J', 'Showing journal control total violation',
'J*', 'Was showing journal control total violation',
'K', 'Showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
'K*', 'Was showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
'L', 'Showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
'L*', 'Was showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
'M', 'Showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
'M*', 'Was showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
'N', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
'N*', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
'O', 'Unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
'O*', 'Was unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
'P', 'Posted',
'Q', 'Showing untaxed journal entry',
'Q*', 'Was showing untaxed journal entry',
'R', 'Showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
'R*', 'Was showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
'S', 'Already selected for posting',
'T', 'Showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
'T*', 'Was showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
'U', 'Unposted',
'V', 'Journal batch is unapproved',
'V*', 'Journal batch was unapproved',
'W', 'Showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
'W*', 'Was showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
'X', 'Showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
'X*', 'Was showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
'Z', 'Showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines',
'Z*', 'Was showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines', NULL ),

While creating Billing, system is very slow..performance issue

Hi,
While creating Billing, system is very slow. How can I debugg and provide the analysis where is the exact problem.
This is showing performance issue.
Waiting for kind response.
Best Regards,
Padhy
Moderator Message : Duplicate post locked.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on May 12, 2011 10:59 AM

hi,
Chk the links
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/4a/e71f39488fee0ce10000000a114084/content.htm
Re: How to create Secondary Index?
How may secondary indices I can create on the ODS?
Deletion of ODS index
Ramesh

As a number of Oracle Connections created - Performance Issue

Hello,
We are using Oracle 9i as a backend and VB 6.0 as Frontend. For one client one connection will be opened in the Database Server, if 200 clients open the application then 200 connections will be opened in the Database Server, due to that performance issue is raising.
We are doing: If the frontend application is not in use for 10-minutes then the connection is closed and at the same time front-end application is also terminated or if the Client terminates the application the connection is closed in the Server.
Eventhought if 200-Clients connect the Server only 4 to 5 Clients send a request to the Server for retriving or for saving the data.
I want to Open a fixed number of connections in the DataBase Server eg., around 10-connections, and i want to use this 10 connections for 200 clients.
At First 10 Connections are opened and 10 Clients are using this 10 connections, among 10 Clients 1 released the database connection after finishing the Job and if 11'th Client opens then this released connection as to be used without opening a new connection, in the same way if some of the connections from 9 get free and if any other clients open application then this connections which are free as to be used for opening the application or else for doing any transaction. So, that the number of connection to be create can be redused.
Please give me the suggestion how to make use the released connection for doing the transaction or else for opening the application.
Thanking U with Regards,
Sravan,
Hyderabad.

As Satish mentioned, Shared Server can be a good solution, but it would also be worth telling us , how did you quantify this thing that due to the number of connections, you have a performance issue? 200 is not that big number I guess. What's the o/s , exact database version and the system details with database details? Also if you have statspack report, post that too over here.
HTH
Aman....

Performance issue : itemRenderers created twice

Hi,
I have a big performance issue with my flex app.
I have a repeater whose repeated items contain a Tree.
I noticed every of those tree elements where created twice (I
call a static incremental counter on their creationComplete event).
Does that symptom make you think of any problem I could have
in my code ?

First, Repeater is not a good choice if you have many complex
elements because it renderers all off the items. How many items are
you repeating? (what is the length of your dataProivder?)
Second, I suspect your methodology for analyzing the
instantiations. I have not see such a behavior. You might post a
sample app that demonstrates the problem.
Tracy

Performance issue: Calling a BAPI PO create in test mode to get error msgs

Hi,
We have an ALV report in which we display purchase orders that got created in SAP, but either got blocked due to not meeting PO Release strategy tolerances or have failed output messages. we are displaying the failed messages even.
We are looping the internal table of eban(PR) & calling bapi po create in test mode to get failed messages.
Now we are facing performance issue in production. What can be the alternate efficient way to get the error msgs with efficiency
Regards,
Ayub H.
Moderator message: duplicate post (different ID, same company...), see below:
Performance issue calling bapi po create in test mode to get error messages
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Mar 9, 2012

Hi Suvarna,
so you need to reduce the number of PO-simulations.
- Likely you checked already, that all EBAN-entries should already be converted into POs. If there would be a large number of "new" EBAN-entries, they don't need to be simulated.
- If it's a temporary problem: give aid to correct the problems (maintain prices or whatever the error-reasons are) Then the amount of not-converted purchase requisitions (PR) should drop, too
- If it's likely, that your volume of open PR will stay high: create a Z-Table with key of EBAN and a counter, simulate (once a day) PO conversions and store the results in the Z-table. In your report you can use the results... if they are "new enough". From time to time new simulations should be done, missing master data might be available.
Maybe users should be allowed to start this 2nd report manually (in background), too -> then they can update the messages after some data corrections themself, without waiting for the result (just check later in online report and do something different in between).
And you might need to explain, PO simulation takes as long as PO creation... there is no easy or fast way around this.
Best regards,
Christian

Performance issue calling bapi po create in test mode to get error messages

Hi,
We have a report which displays in alv the purchase orders that got created in SAP, but either got blocked due to not meeting PO Release Strategy tolerances or have failed output messages .We are displaying the failed messages too.
We are looping the internal table of eban(purchase requisition) and calling bapi po create in test mode to get failed messages.
Now we are facing performance issue in production.What can be the other effecient way to get the error messages without effecting performance.
Regards,
Suvarna

Hi Suvarna,
so you need to reduce the number of PO-simulations.
- Likely you checked already, that all EBAN-entries should already be converted into POs. If there would be a large number of "new" EBAN-entries, they don't need to be simulated.
- If it's a temporary problem: give aid to correct the problems (maintain prices or whatever the error-reasons are) Then the amount of not-converted purchase requisitions (PR) should drop, too
- If it's likely, that your volume of open PR will stay high: create a Z-Table with key of EBAN and a counter, simulate (once a day) PO conversions and store the results in the Z-table. In your report you can use the results... if they are "new enough". From time to time new simulations should be done, missing master data might be available.
Maybe users should be allowed to start this 2nd report manually (in background), too -> then they can update the messages after some data corrections themself, without waiting for the result (just check later in online report and do something different in between).
And you might need to explain, PO simulation takes as long as PO creation... there is no easy or fast way around this.
Best regards,
Christian

Question about a view I created to fix the performance issues

Dear alll;
I have this interesting problem. I created a view to help solve certain performance issue I have been having with my query
see view below
create or replace view view_test as
Select trunc(c.close_date, 'YYYY-MM-DD') as close_date, t.names
from tbl_component c, tbl_joborder t
where c.t_id = t.p_id
and c.type = 'C'
group by trunc(c.close_date, 'YYYY-MM-DD'), t.names
;and I tried testing the view out by using the following syntax and I am getting the following errors
select k.close_date, k.names from view_test k
where k.names = 'Kay'
and k.close_date between to_date('2010-01-01', 'YYYY-MM-DD') and to_date('2010-12-31', 'YYYY-MM-DD')however, I am getting the error messages below
ora-o1898: too many precision specifiersI have googled it and tried a lot of stuff online but I cant fix the problem unfortunately and I dont know why.

Hi,
Instead of
trunc(c.close_date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')say
trunc (c.close_date, 'DD')Oracle apparantly gets confused by saying you want to truncate (or round) to two or more different units.
If it were up to me, I would allow it, since truncatng to the year implies truncating to the month and to the day (not to mention hours, minutes and seconds), but there may be reasons why that would be a pain to implement. (Maybe because there are units, such as 'WW' and 'IW', that are not neat sub-divisions of larger units.)

Performance issue Create table as select BLOB

Hi!
I have a performance issue when moving BLOB´s between tables. (The size of images files are from 2MB to 10MB).
I'm using follwing statement for example,
"Create table tmp_blob as select * from table_blob
where blob_id = 333;"
Is there any hints that I can give when moving data like this or is Oracle10g better with BLOB's?

Did you find a resolution to this issue?
We are also having the same issue and wondering if there is a faster mechanism to copy LOBs between two table.

OVM IO Performance Issues

We are currently testing Oracle Virtual Machine out to see if we can utilize it. We do have a lot of VMWare and HyperV going up in our environment, but Oracle products are not supported on those.
Curious if anyone else is having IO Performance issues with Oracle VM?
I have OVM1 (physical box) connected to SAN with Fiberchannel.
Installed Oracle VM Manager 2.1.5 with no issues.
I setup Oracle VM Server (OVM10) via a template.
Now when I create a Virtual Server (OVM11), with say of 500 GB of disk space, it takes 30 minutes to create the System.img file (goes up to 60 minutes when specify 800GB of disk space). With other VM products, this is around 10 minutes. Now I can deal with the slowness here since an hour is still less then 2 weeks to order and wait for the box.
However after creating the Virtual Server (OVM11), the IO performance on the virtual server is slow. I copied a db to the server and it takes over 8 minutes to copy a single 5GB Datafile from location a to location b (simply unix cp command) on the virtual server (OVM12). I was able to take a cold backup of my 75 GB db on my physical box in under 10 minutes. So there is a big difference there.
Now, I thought ok, something must be misconfigured with my SAN connection. However, when I do the same setup on a box with local disk (Install Oracle VM Server and create a Virtual Linux Server) I still have the same issue.
So I figure I must have something misconfigured with my Oracle VM Server install, but I can not figure it out.
I do have a SR open with Oracle on this, and so far they agree I have an IO issue.
Any insight someone might have would be great.
Thanks.
Chris

How is the storage setup for your virtual disk images? Do you use a single disk image to store the database files? What filesystem type do you use in dom0 and in the guest? Could you try using raw luns on the storage as ASM disks in the guest? You will have to add them manually to the guest configuration file.
When you look at the storage path in a physical machine and in a virtual machine, you'll see some significant differences. If you have one single virtual disk in the guest that most of the I/O is done to, then there's one single blockfront/blockback virtual device connection, with one single ring buffer. The number of outstanding I/O's via the ring buffer is limited. And this virtual disk connection sits on top of the physical I/O path, not in place of. In addition, the guest OS is managing resources needed to do I/O (memory buffers, I/O queue) the same way the dom0 OS is. These two may be interfering with each other. It is difficult enough to configure a physical machine for good I/O performance of a particular workload. Now you have to configure a virtual machine on top of a physical machine, which makes it exponentially more difficult. Especially if different virtual machines have different I/O requirements.

Alter database create datafile as

Hi
T1-)shutdown immediate;
T2-)Take full backup
T3-)startup;
T4-)move the objects in tablespace test1 to some other tablespace
T5-)drop tablespace test1;
T6-)create tablespace test1
datafile 'C:\oraclexe\oradata\XE\test1.dbf' reuse;
T7-)alter system switch logfile;
In some other server;
startup nomount;
restore the backupset which was taken at T2.
restore controlfile at T7.
startup mount;
alter database create datafile 'C:\oraclexe\oradata\XE\test1.dbf' as 'C:\oraclexe\oradata\XE\test1.dbf';
ALTER DATABASE RECOVER automatic database until cancel using backup controlfile;
Recovery performed succefully.
What I wanna ask is;
Since First I issue:
"alter database create datafile as ...."
The contents of this datafile should be deleted with this statement.
Why oracle doesnt give error in recovery, during appliying the statement at T4 ?
I have already deleted the contents of the datafile, how come oracle move the objects?
I hope I am clear

Hi,
although it is beyound my imagination what kind of real world scenario you are trying to simulate with your test, I can tell you why no error gets returned:
You create a new tablespace t1 after you dropped the old one. That gets stored in the current controlfile. The previous backup of the datafile of the old tablespace that incidentally has the same name is now useless for the new tablespace.
You then restore that controlfile and create the datafile manually as it looked after you created the new tablespace (empty) and then recover that. RMAN does that (without complaining even about the uselessness of your doing). If you look into that tablespace, you will see that it is empty as it was after you created it - unless you have put any objects into it after the second creation of that tablespace t1.
Kind regards
Uwe
http://uhesse.wordpress.com

Report Performance Issue - Activity

Hi gurus,
I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
<Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
any input is really appriciated
Thanks in advanced,
Fina

Fina,
Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
Hopefully, this is helping.

Interested by performance issue ? Read this ! If you can explain, you're a master Jedi !

This is the question we will try to answer...
What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
First of all, describe my computer...
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
CPU
Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
RAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
Motherboard
EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
Graphics
PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
Hard Drives
16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
PSU
Cosair 1000 Watts
After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
CPU Introduction
I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it. I used Prime 95 to get the result. // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel. The CPU gives everything it can !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
(picture 1)
Disk Introduction
I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
(picture 2)
Now, I know my limits ! It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
PPBM5 (H.264) Result
I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down). Probably caused by (Encrypt time.... write.... Encrypt time.... write...) // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 39 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down) ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
(picture 3)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Buffering time.... write.... Buffering time.... write...) // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate ! Easy !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40.5 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
(picture 4)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5). It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller. Impossible ! Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage. CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%). // This kind of results let me REALLY confused. It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
(picture 5)
PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Encoding time.... write.... Encoding time.... write...) // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate ! Real Joke !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only. Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
(picture 6)
Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management. My hardware is idle ! I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ? My computer want, but the software not !
(picture 7)
Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects. CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
(picture 8)
Conclusion
There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually. GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card). Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance). I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU. I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
Premiere Pro, I'm speechless ! Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer. Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%. I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor. But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post. It's seem to be a bug...
Thank you.

Patrick,
I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
Just my $ 0.02

Creating datafile performance issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for