Performance issue while selecting material documents MKPF & MSEG

Hello,
I'm facing performance issues in production while selecting Material documents for Sales order and item based on the Sales order Stock.
Here is the query :
I'm first selecting data from ebew table which is the Sales order Stock table then this query.
    IF ibew[] IS NOT INITIAL AND ignore_material_documents IS INITIAL.
*     Select the Material documents created for the the sales orders.
      SELECT mkpf~mblnr mkpf~budat
             mseg~matnr mseg~mat_kdauf mseg~mat_kdpos mseg~shkzg
             mseg~dmbtr mseg~menge
       INTO  CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_mseg
       FROM  mkpf INNER JOIN mseg
       ON    mkpf~mandt = mseg~mandt
       AND   mkpf~mblnr = mseg~mblnr
       AND   mkpf~mjahr = mseg~mjahr
       FOR   ALL entries IN ibew
       WHERE mseg~matnr      = ibew-matnr
       AND   mseg~werks         = ibew-bwkey
       AND   mseg~mat_kdauf   = ibew-vbeln
       AND   mseg~mat_kdpos  = ibew-posnr.
      SORT i_mseg BY mat_kdauf ASCENDING
                     mat_kdpos ASCENDING
                     budat     DESCENDING.
    ENDIF.
I need to select the material documents because the end users want to see the stock as on certain date for the sales orders and only material document lines can give this information. Also EBEW table gives Stock only for current date.
For Example :
If the report was run for Stock date 30th Sept 2008, but  on the 5th Oct 2008, then I need to consider the goods movements after 30th Sept and add if stock was issued or subtract if stock was added.
I know there is an Index MSEG~M in database system on mseg, however I don't know the Storage location LGORT and Movement types BWART that should be considered, so I tried to use all the Storage locations and Movement types available in the system, but this caused the query to run even slower than before.
I could create an index for the fields mentioned in where clause , but it would be an overhead anyways.
Your help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance
regards,
Advait

Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your reply. the performance of the query has significantly improved than before after switching the join from mseg join mkpf.
Actually, I even tried without join and looped using field symbols ,this is working slightly faster than the switched join.
Here are the result ,  tried with 371 records as our sandbox doesn't have too many entries unfortunately ,
Results before switching the join  146036 microseconds
Results after swithing the join        38029 microseconds
Results w/o join                           28068 microseconds for selection and 5725 microseconds for looping
Thanks again.
regards,
Advait

Similar Messages

  • I'm facing performance issue while accessing the PLAF Table

    Dar all,
    I'm facing performance issue while accessing the PLAF Table.
    The START-OF-SELECTION of the report starts with the following select query.
        SELECT plnum  pwwrk matnr gsmng psttr FROM plaf
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_tab
        WHERE matnr IN s_matnr
          AND pwwrk = p_pwwrk
          AND psttr IN s_psttr
          AND auffx = 'X'
          AND paart = 'LA' .
    While executing the report in the Quality system it does not face any performance issue...
    When it comes to Production System the above said select query itself it is taking 15 - 20 minutes time to move further.
    Kindly help me to over come this problem...
    Regards,
    Jessi

    Hi,
    "Just implement its primary Key
    WHERE PLNUM BETWEEN '0000000001' AND '9999999999' " By this you are implementing the Primary Key
    This statement has nothing to do with performance, because system is not able to use primary key or uses every row.
    Jessica, your query uses secondary index created by SAP:
    1     (Material, plant) which uses fields MANDT MATNR and PLWRK.
    but it is not suitable in your case.
    You can consider adding new one, which would containt all fields: MANDT, MATNR, PWWRK, PSTTR AUFFX PAART
    or - but it depends on number of rows meeting and not meeting (auffx = 'X' AND paart = 'LA' ) condition.
    It could speed the performance, if you would create secondary index based on fields MANDT, MATNR, PWWRK, PSTTR
    and do like Ramchander suggested: remove AUFFX and PAART from index and where section, and remove these unwanted rows
    after the query using DELETE statement.
    Regards,
    Przemysław
    Please check how many rows in production system

  • Performance issue while generating Query

    Hi BI Gurus.
    I am facing performance issue while generating query on 0IC_C03.
    It has a variable as (from & to) for generating the report for a particular time duration.
    if the variable (from & to) fields is filled then after taking a long time it shows run time error.
    & if the query is executed without mentioning the variable(which is optional) then the data is extracted from beginning to till date. the same takes less time in execution.
    & after that the period has to be selected manually by option keep filter value. please suggest how can i solve the error
    Regards
    Ritika

    HI RITIKA,
    WEL COME TO SDN.
    YOUHAVE TO CHECK THE FOLLOWING RUN TIME SEGMENTS USING ST03N TCODE:
    High Database Runtime
    High OLAP Runtime
    High Frontend Runtime
    if its high Database Runtime :
    - check the aggregates or create aggregates on cube and this helps you.
    if its High OLAP Runtime :
    - check the user exits if any.
    - check the hier. are used and fetching in deep level.
    If its high frontend runtime:
    - check if a very high number of cells and formattings are transferred to the Frontend ( use "All data" to get value "No. of Cells") which cause high network and frontend (processing) runtime.
    For From and to date variables, create one more set and use it and try.
    Regs,
    VACHAN

  • Performance issue while opening the report

    HI,
    I am working BO XI R3.1.there is performance issue while opening the report in BO Solris Server but  on window server it is compratively fast.
    we have few reports which contains 5 fixed prompt 7 optional prompt.
    out of 5 fixed prompt 3 prompt is static (it contains 3 -4 record only )which is coming from materlied view.
    we have already use many thing for improve performance in report like-
    1) Index Awareness
    2) Aggregate Awareness
    3) Array fatch size-250
    3) Aray bind time -32767
    4) Login time out -600
    the issue is that before refresh opening the report iteslf taking time 1.30 min on BO solris server but same report taking time in BO window server 45 sec. even we  import on others BO solris server it is taking same time as per old solris server(1.30 min).
    when we close the trace in solris server than it is taking 1.15  sec time.it should not be intial phase it is not hitting more on database.so why it is taking that much time while opening the report.
    could you please guide us where exectly problem is there and how we can improve performance for opening the report.In case the problem related to solris server so what would be and how can we rectify.
    Incase any further input require for the same feel free to ask me.

    Hi Kumar,
    If this is happening with all the reports then this issue seems to be due to firewall or security settings of Solaris OS.
    Please try to lower down the security level in solaris and test for the issue.
    Regards,
    Chaitanya Deshpande

  • Issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision

    Hi all,
    I have an issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision. Please find below the details.
    Inspection Lot  10000604689
    Material        1730PCPBS.0031
    Batch           QP611097      GQ02
    Out of total qty of 2100 we need to post the following
    To unrestricted use                     2,098
    To sample usage                         2
    Following error appears,
    Deficit of SL Stck.in qual.insp 1,638 NO : 1730PCPBS.0031 62GQ GQ02 QP611097
    Message no. M7021
    Diagnosis
    Shortfall below the specified stock level or quantity amounting to 1,638 NO.
    System Response
    If the message is an error message (E), the above is not allowed.
    If the message is a warning message (W), the system will allow your input, but the warning is intended to prevent you entering a wrong quantity.
    Procedure
    In the case of a warning message, check the quantity entered.
    In the case of an error message, change the quantity or terminate processing.
    I have checked that quantity 2100 of material 1730PCPBS.0031 is in QI stock. Kindly advice what is the issue and why we are getting the error?
    Regards,
    Brijesh

    Hi Brijesh,
    What is the status of inspection lot?
    One of the possibilities I think could be inconsistencies between MM and QM.
    Have a look on SAP note 48815- Checking possible inconsistencies between MM and QM.
    Regards,
    Anand Rao

  • Performance issue with select query

    Hi friends ,
    This is my select query which is taking so much time to retrive the records.CAn Any one help me in solving this performance issue.
    *- Get the Goods receipts  mainly selected per period (=> MKPF secondary
      SELECT msegebeln msegebelp mseg~werks
             ekkobukrs ekkolifnr ekkozterm ekkoekorg ekko~ekgrp
             ekkoinco1 ekkoexnum
             lfa1name1 lfa1land1 lfa1ktokk lfa1stceg
             mkpfmblnr mkpfmjahr msegzeile mkpfbldat mkpf~budat
             mseg~bwart
    *Start of changes for CIP 6203752 by PGOX02
             mseg~smbln
    *End of changes for CIP 6203752 by PGOX02
             ekpomatnr ekpotxz01 ekpomenge ekpomeins
             ekbemenge ekbedmbtr ekbewrbtr ekbewaers
             ekpolgort ekpomatkl ekpowebaz ekpokonnr ekpo~ktpnr
             ekpoplifz ekpobstae
             INTO TABLE it_temp
        FROM mkpf JOIN mseg ON msegmblnr EQ mkpfmblnr
                           AND msegmjahr EQ mkpfmjahr
                  JOIN ekbe ON ekbeebeln EQ msegebeln
                           AND ekbeebelp EQ msegebelp
                           AND ekbe~zekkn EQ '00'
                           AND ekbe~vgabe EQ '1'
                           AND ekbegjahr EQ msegmjahr
                           AND ekbebelnr EQ msegmblnr
                           AND ekbebuzei EQ msegzeile
                  JOIN ekpo ON ekpoebeln EQ ekbeebeln
                           AND ekpoebelp EQ ekbeebelp
                  JOIN ekko ON ekkoebeln EQ ekpoebeln
                  JOIN lfa1 ON lfa1lifnr EQ ekkolifnr
        WHERE mkpf~budat IN so_budat
          AND mkpf~bldat IN so_bldat
          AND mkpf~vgart EQ 'WE'
          AND mseg~bwart IN so_bwart
          AND mseg~matnr IN so_matnr
          AND mseg~werks IN so_werks
          AND mseg~lifnr IN so_lifnr
          AND mseg~ebeln IN so_ebeln
          AND ekko~ekgrp IN so_ekgrp
          AND ekko~bukrs IN so_bukrs
          AND ekpo~matkl IN so_matkl
          AND ekko~bstyp IN so_bstyp
          AND ekpo~loekz EQ space
          AND ekpo~plifz IN so_plifz.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Manoj Kumar .Thatha
    Moderator message - Please see Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum before posting and please use code tags when posting code - post locked
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 4, 2010 9:03 AM

    Hi friends ,
    This is my select query which is taking so much time to retrive the records.CAn Any one help me in solving this performance issue.
    *- Get the Goods receipts  mainly selected per period (=> MKPF secondary
      SELECT msegebeln msegebelp mseg~werks
             ekkobukrs ekkolifnr ekkozterm ekkoekorg ekko~ekgrp
             ekkoinco1 ekkoexnum
             lfa1name1 lfa1land1 lfa1ktokk lfa1stceg
             mkpfmblnr mkpfmjahr msegzeile mkpfbldat mkpf~budat
             mseg~bwart
    *Start of changes for CIP 6203752 by PGOX02
             mseg~smbln
    *End of changes for CIP 6203752 by PGOX02
             ekpomatnr ekpotxz01 ekpomenge ekpomeins
             ekbemenge ekbedmbtr ekbewrbtr ekbewaers
             ekpolgort ekpomatkl ekpowebaz ekpokonnr ekpo~ktpnr
             ekpoplifz ekpobstae
             INTO TABLE it_temp
        FROM mkpf JOIN mseg ON msegmblnr EQ mkpfmblnr
                           AND msegmjahr EQ mkpfmjahr
                  JOIN ekbe ON ekbeebeln EQ msegebeln
                           AND ekbeebelp EQ msegebelp
                           AND ekbe~zekkn EQ '00'
                           AND ekbe~vgabe EQ '1'
                           AND ekbegjahr EQ msegmjahr
                           AND ekbebelnr EQ msegmblnr
                           AND ekbebuzei EQ msegzeile
                  JOIN ekpo ON ekpoebeln EQ ekbeebeln
                           AND ekpoebelp EQ ekbeebelp
                  JOIN ekko ON ekkoebeln EQ ekpoebeln
                  JOIN lfa1 ON lfa1lifnr EQ ekkolifnr
        WHERE mkpf~budat IN so_budat
          AND mkpf~bldat IN so_bldat
          AND mkpf~vgart EQ 'WE'
          AND mseg~bwart IN so_bwart
          AND mseg~matnr IN so_matnr
          AND mseg~werks IN so_werks
          AND mseg~lifnr IN so_lifnr
          AND mseg~ebeln IN so_ebeln
          AND ekko~ekgrp IN so_ekgrp
          AND ekko~bukrs IN so_bukrs
          AND ekpo~matkl IN so_matkl
          AND ekko~bstyp IN so_bstyp
          AND ekpo~loekz EQ space
          AND ekpo~plifz IN so_plifz.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Manoj Kumar .Thatha
    Moderator message - Please see Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum before posting and please use code tags when posting code - post locked
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 4, 2010 9:03 AM

  • Performance issue while wrapping the sql in pl/sql block

    Hi All,
    I am facing performance issue in a query while wrapping the sql in pl/sql block.
    I have a complex view. while quering the view using
    Select * from v_csp_tabs(Name of View I am using), it is taking 10 second to fetch 50,000 records.
    But when I am using some conditions on the view, Like
    Select * from v_csp_tabs where clientid = 500006 and programid = 1 and vendorid = 1, it is taking more then 250 secs. to return the result set.
    now the weird part is this is happening only for one programID, that is 1
    I am using Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
    Any one please suggest what are the things i need to check..
    I am sorry, I could not provide you the explain plan, because this is in production and I do not have enough prevelage.
    Thank you in advance.
    Thnx,
    Bits

    Bits wrote:
    I have a complex view. while quering the view using
    Select * from v_csp_tabs(Name of View I am using), it is taking 10 second to fetch 50,000 records.
    But when I am using some conditions on the view, Like
    Select * from v_csp_tabs where clientid = 500006 and programid = 1 and vendorid = 1, it is taking more then 250 secs. to return the result set.That's one problem with views - you never know how they will be used in the future, nor what performance implications variant uses can have.
    >
    now the weird part is this is happening only for one programID, that is 1
    Any one please suggest what are the things i need to check..
    I am sorry, I could not provide you the explain plan, because this is in production and I do not have enough prevelage.I understand what you are saying - I have worked at similar sites. HiddenName is correct in suggesting that you need to get execution plans but sometimes getting privileges from the DBA group is simply Not Going To Happen. Its wrong but that's the way it is. Follow through on HiddenName's suggested to get help from somebody who has the privleges needed
    Post the query that view view is executing. Desk checking a query is NOT ideal but is one thing we can do.
    I don't suppose you can see V$ views on production - V$SQL and V$SQL_PLAN (probably not if you can't generate plans, but its worth a thought)

  • Performance Issue on Select Condition on KNA1 table

    Hi,
    I am facing problem when i am selecting from the table KNA1 for given account group and attribute9 it is taking lot of time .
    Please suggest the select query or any other feasible soln to solve this problem
    select
    kunnr
    kotkd
    from kna1
    where kunnr eq parameter value and
    kotkd eq 'ZPY' and katr9 = 'L' or 'T'.
    Firstly i am using in in katr9 then i removed dur to performance issue using read further please suggest further performanace soln

    Hi,
    The select should be like:
    select
    kunnr
    kotkd
    from kna1
    where kunnr eq parameter value
        and kotkd eq 'ZPY'
         and katr9 in r_katr9. "  'L' or 'T'.
    create a range for katr9 like r_katr9 with L or T.
    Because while selecting the entries from KNA1, it will check for KATR9 = L and then KATR9 = T.
    Hope the above statement is useful for you.
    Regards,
    Shiva.

  • Performance Issue in NWBC Material 6.1

    We are facing a major performance issue on Development and QA env for Material NWBC in 6.1 during UAT with a limited users only.  Initially we have observed that the memory space is 0% and 2% on Dev and Q environments.We have asked the infrastructure partner to take a corrective action and the memory was freed on the environments. But this did not help.
    Then we doubted on http side of the Dev and Q system. No issue were found with the connection to BODS. As per the observation from the infra team there is no real bottleneck, from OS, SAP and DB2 side. Even the restart of all the components was also performed but still the performance issue exists.Please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Subhronath

    Hi,
    Did you trace the ABAP logs?..it indicates which area/methods of your application taking long time. you might want to do in ST12 trace and you may use tool like httpwatch or SAT trace to find out where exactly it's taking time or memory.
    Once you do that, You may need to refer MDG performance tweak document to fine tune your performance issue.
    SCN Link is here.
    Did
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d06a297f-e11d-3110-83be-87f69a72c426?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&58987080851987
    Thanks
    Praveen

  • Error While cancelling material document

    Hi ,
    I Want to cancel a material document which was posted some five months back in current period because already the period is closed and mean time the price of the material also has changed ,now while I am trying to cancel the document system throughs an error that document cannot be posted error in price determination what may be the cause and how to rectify.
    Regards
    kantha

    Hi Vijikantha,
       If you are trying to cancel material documents created related to delivery, you can reverse the delivery through VL09. Any material documents for goods receipt can  be cancelled through MBST. If there is a problem with the posting period, please take the help of Finance guy to open the previous period and try to post the document.
    Best Regards
    Srinivas

  • Performance Problem While Selecting a Query....

    Hi Users
    I have problem with performance with appliction
    where are using D2K frent end and backend oracle 9i
    we have a validaion buttion that is taking lot of time to check the date like 500 records
    i want some links about performance issue process pls help.
    Here some of the query taking more than 1sec to more
    1)
    SELECT      
    /*+(INDEX(KBS_CHKSHTCARDTB(IND1_CHKSHTCARD))*/
    COUNT(DISTINCT A.KBCK_CHKSHEET_NO)
    FROM     
    KBS_CHKSHTCARDTB A ,KBS_CHKSHTHDRTB B                              WHERE A.KBCK_CHKSHEET_NO=B.KBCH_CHKSHEET_NO          
    AND KBCK_E_DATE =TRUNC(SYSDATE)
    AND KBCH_PRINT_STATUS='P'     
    OutPut: 206
    Time : 1sec
    2)
    UPDATE KBS_CARDMASTERTB
    SET KBCM_LOCK_FROM = KBCM_LOCK_FROM_CONTROL,
    KBCM_LOCK_STATUS= NULL
         WHERE KBCM_LOCK_FROM_CONTROL is not null
         and KBCM_LOCK_FROM IS NULL
         and KBCM_LOCK_FROM_CONTROL <=trunc(sysdate)      
         AND KBCM_LOCK_STATUS = 'Y'
    and KBCM_UNIQUE_IDNO IN(SELECT DISTINCT KBSA_UNIQUE_IDNO
    FROM KBS_SCANTB WHERE TRUNC(KBSA_E_DATE)      = TRUNC(:KANBAN_CTRL_BLK.DAT)
    AND KBSA_TRUCK_SQ_NO           = :Kanban_ctrl_blk.cycl
    AND KBSA_ERROR_CODE      IS NULL)
    AND (KBCM_VENDOR_NO,KBCM_PLANT_CODE)in (SELECT DISTINCT kbsa_vendor_no,KBSA_PLANT_CODE
    FROM KBS_SCANTB      WHERE TRUNC(KBSA_E_DATE)      = TRUNC(:KANBAN_CTRL_BLK.DAT)           AND KBSA_TRUCK_SQ_NO = :Kanban_ctrl_blk.cycl AND KBSA_ERROR_CODE      IS NULL)
    AND KBCM_PROCESS_CODE IN (SELECT DISTINCT KBSA_PROCESS_CODE
    FROM KBS_SCANTB                                              WHERE TRUNC(KBSA_E_DATE)      = TRUNC(:KANBAN_CTRL_BLK.DAT) AND KBSA_TRUCK_SQ_NO = :Kanban_ctrl_blk.cycl
    AND KBSA_ERROR_CODE      IS NULL);
    OutPut: Totatl Number of Table:29288
    Time : more than     5sec
    3)
    CURSOR GET_TEMP_CARDS_SWIPED_CUR IS
         SELECT KBCM_VENDOR_NO
                        ,KBCM_PLANT_CODE
                        ,KBCM_FAMILY --ADDED BY SUJITH.C TO SUPPORT PSMS2
                        ,KBCM_BACK_NO
                        ,KBCM_UNIQUE_IDNO
                        ,KBCM_KANBAN_TYPE
         FROM KBS_CARDMASTERTB
         WHERE KBCM_KANBAN_TYPE IN ('T','B')
         AND KBCM_UNIQUE_IDNO IN
    (SELECT KBSA_UNIQUE_IDNO
    FROM          KBS_SCANTB
    WHERE KBSA_E_DATE                = :DAT
    AND          KBSA_TRUCK_SQ_NO      = :CYCL
    AND KBSA_ERROR_CODE      IS NULL
    AND KBSA_TYPE IS NULL);
    Thanks Advance ........

    [When your query takes too long...|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=1812597#1812597]
    [How to post a SQL statement tuning request|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=863295&tstart=0]

  • Performance Issue with Selection Screen Values

    Hi,
    I am facing a performance issue(seems like a performance issue ) in my project.
    I have a query with some RKFs and sales area in filters (single value variable which is optional).
    Query is by default  restricted by current month.
    The Cube on which the query operates has around 400,000 records for a month.
    The Cube gets loaded every three hours
    When I run the query with no filters I get the output within 10~15 secs.
    The issue I am facing is that,  when I enter a sales area in my selection screen the query gets stuck in the data selection step. In fact we are facing the same problem if we use one or two other characteristics in our selection screen
    We have aggregates/indexes etc on our cube.
    Has any one faced a similar situation?
    Does any one have any comments on this ?
    Your help will be appreciated. Thanks

    Hi A R,
    Goto RSRT--> Give ur query anme --> Execute =Debug
    --> No a pop up ill come with many check boxes select "Display Aggregates found" option --> now give ur
    selections in variable screen > first it will give the already existing aggregate names> continue> now after displaying all the aggregates it will display the list of objects realted to cube wise> try to copy these objects into notepad> again go with ur drill downs now u'll get the already existing aggregates for this drill down-> it will display the list of objects> copy them to notepad> now sort all the objects related to one cube by deleting duplicate objects in the note pad>goto that Infocube> context>maintain aggregates> create aggregate on the objects u copied into note pad.
    now try to execyte the report... it should work properly with out delays for those selections.
    I hope it helps you...
    Regards,
    Ramki.

  • Performance Issue while Joining two Big Tables

    Hello Experts,
    We've the following Scenario, wherein we need to have Sales rep associated for a Sales Order. This information is available in VBPA table with Sales Order, Sales Order Item and Partner Function being the key.
    NOw I'm interested in only one Partner Function for e.g. 'ZP'. This table is having around 120 million records.
    I tried both options:
    Option 1 - Join this table(VBPA) with Sales Order Item table(VBAP) within the Data Foundation Layer of the Analytic View and doing the filtering on Partner Function
    Option 2 - Create a Attribute View for VBPA having filtering on Partner Function and then join this Attribute View in the Logical Join Layer with the Data Foundation table.
    Both these options are killing the performance.
    Is there any way out to achieve this ?
    Your expert opinion is greatly appreciated!!
    Thanks & regards,
    Jomy

    Hi,
    Lars is correct. You may have to spend a little bit more time and give a bigger picture.
    I have used this join. It takes about 2 to 3 seconds to execute this join for me. My data volume is less than yours.
    You must be have used a left outer join when joining the attribute view (with constant filter ZP  as specified in your first post) to the data foundation. Please cross check once again, as sometimes my fat finger inadvertently changed the join type and I had to go back and fix it. If this is a left outer join or a referential join, HANA  does not perform the join if you are not requesting any field from the attribute view on table VBPA. This used to be a problem due to a bug in SP4 but got fixed in SP5.
    However, if you have performed this join in the data foundation, it does enforce, the join even if you did not ask any fields from the VBPA table. The reason being that you have put a constant filter ZR (LIPS->VBPA join in  data foundation as specified in one of your later replies).
    If any measure you are selecting in the analytic view is a restricted measure  or a calculated measure that needs some field from VBPA, then the join will be enforced as you would agree. This is where I had most trouble. My  join itself is not bad but my business requirement to get the current value of a partner attribute on  a higher level calculation view sent too much data from analytic view to calculation view.
    Please send the full diagram  of your model and vizplan. Also, if you are using a front end (like analysis office), please trap the SQL sent from this front end tool and include it in the message.  Even a straight SQL you have used in which you have detected this performance issue will be helpful.
    Ramana

  • Issues while archiving Invoice documents

    Hi all,
    While archiving Invoice documents using MM_REBEL(using company code only), it was found that the write job is picking up certain open Invoices also. ie the subsequent Accounting document was not cleared/archived.
    My understanding was the system will check for retention periods and whether the subsequent documents are archived or not.
    I just wanted to know if there are any extra checks , which it looks for , as the criterion for archiveablility.
    Please let me know if anyone knows about this or if any of you have faced similar issues .
    Regards,
    Shail.

    hi,
    Dependencies
    The status of the document determines whether it can be archived:
    ·        Documents with the status Closed or Deleted can be archived.
    ·        Documents with the status Unchecked, Checked and Errors Found, or Checked and No Errors Found cannot be archived.
    Financial accounting documents generated when invoice documents are posted are not archived with the object MM_REBEL. They are archived in Financial Accounting.
    Residence Time/Retention Period of Data in the System
    The retention period for invoice documents can be configured in the Customizing system. The posting date contained in the invoice document header is the key date for the retention period.
    If a retention period has not been set in Customizing, the system takes the minimum retention period as 9999 days.
    Presettings
    In Customizing for Invoice Verification you can set the retention period for invoice documents per company code under Define Document Lives.
    Hope it helps..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Performance issues while opening business rule

    Hi,
    we're working with Hyperion version 9.2.1 and we're having some performance problems while opening business rules. I analyzed the issue and found out that it has something to do with assigning access privileges to the rule.
    The authorization plan looks as followed:
    User A is assigned to group G1
    User B is assigned to group G2
    Group G1 ist assigned to Group XYZ
    Group G2 ist assigned to Group XYZ
    Group XYZ holds the provision "basic user" for the planning application.
    Without assigning any access priviliege the business rule opens immediately.
    By assigning access privilege to group G1/G2 (validate or launch) the business rule opens immediately.
    By assigning access privilege to group XYZ the business rule opens after 2-5 minutes.
    Has anyone an idea why this happens and how to solve this?
    Kind regards
    Uli
    Edited by: user13110201 on 12.05.2010 04:31

    This has been an issue with Business Rules for quite awhile. Oracle has made steps both forward and backward in later releases than yours; and they've issued patches addressing, if not completely resolving, the problem. Things finally seem to be much better in 11.1.1.3, although YMMV.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there a way to reduce the pixel size of multiple photos in a slideshow?

    I have a Windows 7 computer and use Photoshop Elements 9 and Premiere Elements 9.  I recently completed a slideshow that contains about 360 photos, many or all of which exceed the maximum size of 1000 x 750 pixels.  Is there any way that I can easily

  • Can't use Wi-Fi.

    My iPad requests apple-username and password when I try to connect my usual Wi-Fi at home. When I type it it dosn't work. It did work earlier without username and password. What has happened? /Elisabeth

  • Coying contact between 2 contact account on iPhone

    HI I have two contacts lists on my iPhone (2 different contact accounts) I would like to know how to copy one contact from on acoount to the other one (From my exchange contact list to my ME on, or inverse) thank you for help

  • Where does the Share button take my document?!

    I scanned a private document on my printer using the iPad app Printercontrol, I wanted to email the document to myself so I went to the Files menu, selected the scanned document and instead of pressing the arrow(share) icon, I pressed the Share butto

  • Numbers sumif formula

    I used the following formula in Excel =SUMIF(I$27:I$105,"=M",H$27:H$105). This formula does not work in Numbers, I have tried a variety searches under help and have looked for books at the bookstores that may add insight to no avail. I anticipate the