Performance Monitor :SOAPtoSOAP using AAE

I'm trying to monitor the performance of SOAPtoSOAP using Advanced Adapter Engine.
(The environment is NW PI7.1 SPS7)
When I sent message to SOAP adapter from RWB,I could monitor the process and check the time(in second) from Message Monitor in RWB.
However, when the process is completed within one second, I don't know how long it took.
I also tried to check the process time from Performance Monitor in RWB, but it does not show any processes using AAE.
Does anyone know how to check the process time (SOAPtoSOAP using AAE) in milli-second?
Regards,
Yohei
Edited by: Yohei Kasai on Apr 2, 2009 7:06 AM
Edited by: Yohei Kasai on Apr 2, 2009 8:15 AM

Your programming sequence for the performance monitor for DMA transfers looks alright.
I think a similar set-up was done in the XAPP1205 to measure the dma performance. Can you check?
http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/application_notes/xapp1205-high-performance-video-zynq.pdf

Similar Messages

PI 7.1 Performance Monitoring - Advanced Adapter Engine (AAE)

Hi Experts,
how can i use the "Performance Monitoring" from the RWB, to see all the messages (including the messages from the AAE) for a specific timeperiod? For example, i want to know how many messages go through the PI (including AAE) on one day.
Best regards,
Sven

Hi Sven,
Kindly find the below documents will helps you more
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70b8adc3-728c-2a10-7fad-d43f29074ef8
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c02dde55-b30d-2c10-a68b-e80e0d86336d
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10cf9746-e819-2c10-bd82-97bfbde8214a
Regards
Venkat Rao .G

How do I write/use performance monitor to run an action when something happens?

I notice that I get a popup if desktop resources are over-used asking me if I want to turn off the glass desktop.
That's fine.
I've been looking in Performance Monitor for how this is done, as I have a program that periodically runs amok and starts indexing my Documents directory. I usually start to notice my machine getting sluggish when the process gets to about 1.5-2+GB
in Virtual and working memory. At that point it seems to be increasing it's network usage rate geometically, and interrups will start getting delayed or lost -- keyboard will lock up for periods, lots of things freezing temporarily (music will get 10-20
second dropouts) It can even cause a complete system lockup
So what I would like to do is monitor any instance of this process by name ('explorer'), and restart it when it gets to over 1.5GB of usage.
I setup a monitor of virtual size and working memory in the performance monitor, but I don't see how to set up an alarm that starts an action to restart it. (restarting it will cause the problem to go away for anywhere from a few hours to several days).
I've no clue as to what triggers it.
I found a bunch of XML scripts in
Windows/pla/Rules with names like:
Rules.System.CPU.xml*
Rules.System.Common.xml*
Rules.System.Configuration.xml*
Rules.System.Diagnostics.xml*
Rules.System.Disk.xml*
Rules.System.Finale.xml*
Rules.System.Memory.xml*
Rules.System.NetDiagFramework.xml*
Rules.System.NetTrace.xml*
Rules.System.Network.xml*
Rules.System.Performance.xml*
Rules.System.Performance.xml.orig*
Rules.System.Summary.xml*
Rules.System.Wired.xml*
Rules.System.Wireless.xml*
These have some XML language in them that looks like it woud be for monitorying and doing actions:
<Rule name="$(RuleDiskSummary)" enabled="true">
   <Step select="/Report/Section/Table[@name='hotFile']">
    <Exists>
     <Otherwise>
      <Delete select="Summary"/>
     </Otherwise>
    </Exists>
   </Step>
   <Step select="/Report/Section/Table[@name='physicalDiskCounters']" fatal="true">
    <Exists>
     <Otherwise>
      <Insert>
       <Node>
        <Summary key="100" find="field" field="counter" value="Avg. Disk Queue Length" topic="diskInfo">
         <Data name="max" label="diskQueue"/>
        </Summary>
       </Node>
      </Insert>
     </Otherwise>
    </Exists>
   </Step>
</Rule>
</Group>
<StringTable>
<String ID="GroupSummary">Add Summary Blocks</String>
<String ID="RuleMemorySummary">Memory Summary</String>
<String ID="RuleDiskSummary">Disk Summary</String>
<String ID="RuleNetworkSummary">Network Summary</String>
</StringTable>
<Rule name="$(RuleDiskSummary)" enabled="true">
   <Step select="/Report/Section/Table[@name='hotFile']">
    <Exists>
     <Otherwise>
      <Delete select="Summary"/>
     </Otherwise>
    </Exists>
   </Step>
   <Step select="/Report/Section/Table[@name='physicalDiskCounters']" fatal="true">
    <Exists>
     <Otherwise>
      <Insert>
       <Node>
        <Summary key="100" find="field" field="counter" value="Avg. Disk Queue Length" topic="diskInfo">
         <Data name="max" label="diskQueue"/>
        </Summary>
       </Node>
      </Insert>
     </Otherwise>
    </Exists>
   </Step>
</Rule>
</Group>
<StringTable>
<String ID="GroupSummary">Add Summary Blocks</String>
<String ID="RuleMemorySummary">Memory Summary</String>
<String ID="RuleDiskSummary">Disk Summary</String>
<String ID="RuleNetworkSummary">Network Summary</String>
</StringTable>
Question is, how can I setup it for calling a trigger script when
parameters for Explorer get out of spec.
On confusing issue that stopped me from proceeding, was the time schedule to run the report:
I only allows for once/day.
I need / want continuous monitorying -- say at 1 minute or 3 minute intervals (5 might work, not sure -- doesn't take long for Explorer to get to 1-2G with a network connection of 10Gb.
So how can I monitor and control it?
A side issue -- I notice a resource-control agent for Win 2008 -- but this was disabled for Win7.
Anyone know why resource usage on Win7 was considered less important than on Win2k8 server?
My version of Win7 is Win7-x64-sp1 "Ultimate" [sic] (it doesn't include professional features like resource control)...
Thanks...This has bothered me for over a year and has persisted through new profiles and reinstalls of of the OS.
I have a feeling it is related to MS disabling Network disks in their indexer, so Explorer ends up doing it as a surrogage for things like the search engine (with the results not stored, because they are not local -- the worst of both worlds?)... but that's
just a feeling...
Thanks!
Astara...

You can create a Data Collector Set (create manually, not template), then choose performance counter Alert, configure alert actions, from the script, seems you want to monitor the “physicalDisk” performance, so you can set the “physicalDiskCounters”
into alert action, please follow the instruction in the link below.
Monitor disk space
http://www.ms-opsmgr.eu/?cat=43
If you want to view the detailed process related about explorer when your machine getting sluggish, I'd like to introduce a tool named process explorer to you.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx
It can clearly show you the processes running in your system, along with the hierarchical relationship and the cpu usage.
NOTE
This
response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you.
Microsoft
does not control these sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites.
Regards
Yolanda
TechNet Community Support

Use Windows Performance Monitor on WLS 6.1 SP4?

Hi,
I wonder whether it's possible to use the Windows Performance Monitor to monitor WLS 6.1 SP4 performance counters.
I would like this obviously to be able to save counters from WLS and Windows in one file for later analysis.
If it's possible. What do I have to do to make it work? I have just installed WLS 6.1 incl SP4.

John <[email protected]> wrote:
I wonder whether it's possible to use the Windows Performance Monitor
to monitor WLS 6.1 SP4 performance counters.No, not as far as I know. WLS performance counters cannot "talk" with the Win32
performance monitoring APIs or native WMI. It's a technically difficult challenge
to link these two components together (requiring knowledge of NT internals and
such) .
You may wish to contact a third-party vendor that provides J2EE black-box monitoring
and collection software. Most allow for "offline" analysis, too.
Brian J. Mitchell
Systems Administrator, TRX
email: [email protected]
office: +1 404 327 7238
mobile: +1 678 283 6530

Different transaction codes useful for Performance Monitoring

Hi Experts,
Please can you guide me on this question, as to what are the different transaction codes useful for Performance Monitoring i.e. workload statistics and database statistics? What kind of statistics do each of these codes provide?
Many thanks,
Mithun

Hi Mithun
In performance issuses you need to look in terms of many ways that is..
Workload analsys
ST03N: Statistics Regards Locallly
ST03G: Statistics Regards Golbally
STAD: Individual Statistics Regards
STATTRAACE: Individual Statistics Regards Trace
ST07 : User Distribution
Buffers and Memory
ST02 : Buffers and Memory and swaps monitoring
ST10: Table Acess
OS Monitoring
OS04: Locally monitoring
OS07: Remotely monitoring
OS01: LAN check
DataBase Side
ST04: Performance overview
DB01: Exclusive locks
DB02: Tables/Indexes
BackgroundJobs monitor
SM37
other tcodes
ST22: Abap Dumps
SM12: Lock Entries
SM56: NumberRange Buffers
SU56: User Buffer
all above transactions are need to monitor for Performance.
Regards
Bandla

Performance monitoring using 'Motion Analysis.vi'

Hi,
Can anybody help me show how to retrieve/find this LabVIEW program: 'Motion Analysis.vi'. Been going thru NI.com for examples but couldn't find anything familiar to it. Or any suggestion on how to perform control monitoring analysis using LabVIEW on SolidWorks model simulation.
Thanks in advance

Hi Clovis,
sorry, but to my knowlegde the performance analysis feature of DB Studio is not yet fully supported for 7.7 databases.
It's still somewhat in development...
When I don't have a SAP NetWeaver CCMS at hand I usually go for running the selects against sysparseid manually as it is described in the [WIKI|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/MaxDB/Command+Monitor].
regards,
Lars

RFC (using AAE) vs IDoc (Using IE) vs ABAP Proxy (using IE) in PI7.1

Hi All,
In previous versions of SAP PI, SAP recommends the use of IDoc or Proxy over RFC mainly due to performance reasons, but with PI 7.1, RFCs can use AAE which significantly boost its processing.
So the question is, with PI 7.1, is the performance of RFC adapter using AAE good enough that is should be considered over IDocs (using IE) & Proxies (using IE)? Please provide elaborate reply.
Thanks,
Rahul

>>>>>So the question is, with PI 7.1, is the performance of RFC adapter using AAE good enough that is should be considered over IDocs (using IE) & Proxies (using IE)? Please provide elaborate reply.
Answer: If your major objective is only the performance factor then you can go for AAE using RFC. But RFC's individual processing performance is slightly lower than idocs and proxy.
Though AAE monitoring is just only in RWB, But due to less persistence steps involved in the entire processing, RFC with AAE supercede other options.
IDOc using IE vs Abap Proxy using IE --- I would recommend only Abap Proxy using IE. Plus you get all the monitoring features here.

Adapter Engine: Performance Monitoring?

Dear Experts
I am assessing the PI 7.1 Advanced Adapter Engine and execute a Performance Test against a standard
scenario using the Adapter Engine processing.
I would like to understand and see the 'performance boost', mentioned by SAP, but I am not able to find
a tool which gives me this view on performance (e.g. message processing time) in the Adapter Engine.
The Runtime Workbench tab 'Performance Monitoring' seems to be limited to the ABAP Integration Server.
Is there any settings I can use to get this view? Or is there any other metric which could be used to
validate the actual performance improvement by the AAE?
Thanks for you ideas.
Mathias.

Hi,
You use the Advanced Adapter Engine to connect the Integration Engine to SAP systems (RFC adapter) and non-SAP systems. You use the various adapters in the Adapter Engine to convert XML- and HTTP-based messages to the specific protocol and format required by these systems, and the other way around.
Using Integrated Configuration you can define a local Message Processing on the Advanced Adapter Engine. The Advanced Adapter Engine provides mapping and routing for this locally. Message Processing is only executed on the Advanced Adapter Engine from one adapter to another without the involvement of the Integration Engine. You can gain a great improvement in performance.
You can implement all adapters on the Adapter Engine for a local Message Processing on the Advanced Adapter Engine, apart from the RNIF adapters and the CIDX adapters.
If you do not use Integrated Configuration, Message Processing will always be performed by the Integration Engine to execute the routing and mapping there.
The Advanced Adapter Engine is a separate software component that is automatically installed on the Integration Server. In this case, it is the central Advanced Adapter Engine. However, you can also install the Advanced Adapter Engine separately on another host. This is then a non-central Advanced Adapter Engine.
Please reward points if it helps
Thanks
Vikranth

HELP: failed to deploy and run WL performance monitor, console extension

Hi All
i downloaded and installed the WL performance monitor, console extension package
at http://commerce.bea.com/products/weblogicserverconsoleextension/wlsext_home.jsp
As i tried to deploy "performance monitor" web app to the WL server at "Performance
Monitor > Installation Instructions " screen. I just saw the error msg
weblogic.management.ManagementRuntimeException: weblogic.management.ApplicationException:
[J2EE:160029]I/O error while reading deployment - java.io.FileNotFoundException:
No such path: null\java\FenwayWL.war.
java.io.FileNotFoundException: No such path: null\java\FenwayWL.war
     at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEUtils.getDeploymentInfo(J2EEUtils.java:191)
     at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEUtils.getDeploymentInfo(J2EEUtils.java:155)
     at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEApplicationContainerFactory.initializeDeployment(J2EEApplicationContainerFactory.java:452)
     at weblogic.management.deploy.DeployerRuntime.unprotectedActivate(DeployerRuntime.java:833)
Therefore, i used workaround to manually copy "PerformanceMonitor.war" and "FenwayWL.war"
to <Domain Home>/applications directory for manual deployment. However, it seems
of no use. I still failed to carry out any operations through "performance monitor"
node at left panel of admin console. For e.g, i failed to enable "resources" and
"statistics" monitoring option at "Performance Monitor > Agent Configuration "
screen. Very thankful somebody can help me to sort out my problem. My platform
is win2000 + WL 8.1 sp1
thanks u very much in advance.
dso

In order to find the PerformanceMonitor web app, the ConsoleExt needs to
examine your classpath to get the appropriate WLHOME. It does this by
searching for .../server/lib/weblogic.jar. Please make sure your CLASSPATH
is correct and matches where PerformanceMonitor is installed. For example,
the path to .../server/lib/weblogic.jar is the same as to ../common/perf. In
my world, they both happen to be d:\bea\weblogic81.
Paul.
"dso" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hi All
i downloaded and installed the WL performance monitor, console extension
package
at http://commerce.bea.com/products/weblogicserverconsoleextension/wlsext_home.jsp
As i tried to deploy "performance monitor" web app to the WL server at
"Performance
Monitor > Installation Instructions " screen. I just saw the error msg
weblogic.management.ManagementRuntimeException: weblogic.management.ApplicationException:
[J2EE:160029]I/O error while reading deployment - java.io.FileNotFoundException:
No such path: null\java\FenwayWL.war. java.io.FileNotFoundException:
No such path:
null\java\FenwayWL.war at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEUtils.getDeploymentInfo(J2EEUtils.java:191)
at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEUtils.getDeploymentInfo(J2EEUtils.java:155) at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEApplicationContainerFactory.initializeDeployment(J2EEApplicationContainerFactory.java:452)
at weblogic.management.deploy.DeployerRuntime.unprotectedActivate(DeployerRuntime.java:833)
Therefore, i used workaround to manually copy "PerformanceMonitor.war"
and "FenwayWL.war"
to <Domain Home>/applications directory for manual deployment. However,
it seems
of no use. I still failed to carry out any operations through "performance
monitor"
node at left panel of admin console. For e.g, i failed to enable "resources"
and
"statistics" monitoring option at "Performance Monitor > Agent Configuration
screen. Very thankful somebody can help me to sort out my problem. My
platform
is win2000 + WL 8.1 sp1
thanks u very much in advance.
dso

HELP: failed to setup and run WL performance monitor, console extension on WL 8.1

Hi All
i downloaded and installed the WL performance monitor, console extension package
at http://commerce.bea.com/products/weblogicserverconsoleextension/wlsext_home.jsp
As i tried to deploy "performance monitor" web app to the WL server at "Performance
Monitor > Installation Instructions " screen. I just saw the error msg
weblogic.management.ManagementRuntimeException: weblogic.management.ApplicationException:
[J2EE:160029]I/O error while reading deployment - java.io.FileNotFoundException:
No such path: null\java\FenwayWL.war. java.io.FileNotFoundException: No such path:
null\java\FenwayWL.war at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEUtils.getDeploymentInfo(J2EEUtils.java:191)
at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEUtils.getDeploymentInfo(J2EEUtils.java:155) at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEApplicationContainerFactory.initializeDeployment(J2EEApplicationContainerFactory.java:452)
at weblogic.management.deploy.DeployerRuntime.unprotectedActivate(DeployerRuntime.java:833)
Therefore, i used workaround to manually copy "PerformanceMonitor.war" and "FenwayWL.war"
to <Domain Home>/applications directory for manual deployment. However, it seems
of no use. I still failed to carry out any operations through "performance monitor"
node at left panel of admin console. For e.g, i failed to enable "resources" and
"statistics" monitoring option at "Performance Monitor > Agent Configuration "
screen. Very thankful somebody can help me to sort out my problem. My platform
is win2000 + WL 8.1 sp1
thanks u very much in advance.
dso

In order to find the PerformanceMonitor web app, the ConsoleExt needs to
examine your classpath to get the appropriate WLHOME. It does this by
searching for .../server/lib/weblogic.jar. Please make sure your CLASSPATH
is correct and matches where PerformanceMonitor is installed. For example,
the path to .../server/lib/weblogic.jar is the same as to ../common/perf. In
my world, they both happen to be d:\bea\weblogic81.
Paul.
"dso" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hi All
i downloaded and installed the WL performance monitor, console extension
package
at http://commerce.bea.com/products/weblogicserverconsoleextension/wlsext_home.jsp
As i tried to deploy "performance monitor" web app to the WL server at
"Performance
Monitor > Installation Instructions " screen. I just saw the error msg
weblogic.management.ManagementRuntimeException: weblogic.management.ApplicationException:
[J2EE:160029]I/O error while reading deployment - java.io.FileNotFoundException:
No such path: null\java\FenwayWL.war. java.io.FileNotFoundException:
No such path:
null\java\FenwayWL.war at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEUtils.getDeploymentInfo(J2EEUtils.java:191)
at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEUtils.getDeploymentInfo(J2EEUtils.java:155) at weblogic.j2ee.J2EEApplicationContainerFactory.initializeDeployment(J2EEApplicationContainerFactory.java:452)
at weblogic.management.deploy.DeployerRuntime.unprotectedActivate(DeployerRuntime.java:833)
Therefore, i used workaround to manually copy "PerformanceMonitor.war"
and "FenwayWL.war"
to <Domain Home>/applications directory for manual deployment. However,
it seems
of no use. I still failed to carry out any operations through "performance
monitor"
node at left panel of admin console. For e.g, i failed to enable "resources"
and
"statistics" monitoring option at "Performance Monitor > Agent Configuration
screen. Very thankful somebody can help me to sort out my problem. My
platform
is win2000 + WL 8.1 sp1
thanks u very much in advance.
dso

Help needed in getting real time system performance monitor

Hi,
I need a real time system performance monitor for my solaris.
i am able to graph system usage graph on a daily/weely basis using the ksar grapher.
In the same way i need to capture the system utilisation real time to be viewed on a webpage. Please let me know if there are any free tool/scripts capable of doing it.

Hi,
Process Chain Errors
/people/mona.kapur/blog/2008/01/14/process-chain-errors
Common Process chain errors
For Data Load Errors check this blog:
/people/siegfried.szameitat/blog/2005/07/28/data-load-errors--basic-checks
Implementation issues
Lifecycle Implementation
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv170/documentation/SolutionScope_EN.doc
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv235/BI_EN/documentation/BWProjectPlan_EN.mpp
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
JituK

Performance problems when using Premiere Elements for photo slideshows

Hello,
I had been using Premiere Elements 9 (PE9) to make a simple slideshow for my parents from their vacation trip and I ran into some serious performance problems. I had used it to create similar projects before, but not nearly as big. This one is like 260 photos, so basically it is 260 seperate clips. I have a POWERHOUSE workstation (see below) so it isn't my PC. Even when PE9 crashes, looking at my performance monitor my CPU and RAM aren't even halfway being utilized. I finally switched to Windows Movie Maker of all things and it worked seemlessly, amazing really. I'm wondering if I was just using PE9 for something other than what it was designed for since there weren't really any video clips, just a ton of photos that I made into video clips, if that makes sense. Based upon my experience with this so far, I can't imagine using PE9 anymore for anything really. I might have the need for a more professional video editing program in the near future, although it does seem like PE has a lot of features. How can I make sure it utilizes my workstation to its full potential? Here are my specs:
PC
Intel Core i7-2600K 4.6 GHz Overclocked
ASUS P8P67 Deluxe Motherboard
AMD Firepro V8800 Video Card
Crucial 128 GB SATA 6Gb/s Solid State Drive (Operating System)
Corsair Vengeance 16GB (4x4GB) Memory
Corsair H60 Liquid CPU Cooler
Corsair Professional Series Gold AX850 Power Supply
Graphite Series 600T Mid-Tower Case
Western Digital Caviar Black 1 TB SATA III Hard Drive
Western Digital Caviar Black 2 TB SATA III Hard Drive
Western Digital Green 3 TB SATA III Hard Drive
Logitech Wireless Gaming Mouse G700
I don’t play any games but it’s a great productivity mouse with 13 customizable buttons
Wacom Intuos5 Pen Tablet
Yes, this system is blazingly fast. I have yet to feel it slow down, even with Photoshop, Lightroom, InDesign, Illustrator and numerous other apps running at the same time. HOWEVER, Premiere Elements 9 has crashed NUMERUOS times, every time my system wasn't even close to being fully taxed.
Monitors – All run on the ATI V8800
Dell Ultra Sharp 30 inch
Samsung 27 Inch
HAANS-G 28 Inch
Herman Miller Embody Ergonomic Chair (one of my favorite items)

Andy,
There ARE some differences between PrE and PrPro w/ an approved CUDA-capable and MPE hardware acceleration-enabled nVidia video card, but those differences show up ONLY in the quality of the Scaling. The processing overhead is almost exactly the same, when it comes to handling the extra pixels.
As of PrPro CS 5, two things changed:
The max. size of Still Images went up from 4096 x 4096 pixels, to quite a bit larger (cannot recall the numbers now).
The Scaling algorithms have been improved, though ONLY with the correct nVidia cards, with MPE hardware support enabled.
Now, there CAN be another consideration, between the two programs, in that PrPro CS 5 - CS 6, are 64-bit ONLY, so one benefits from the computer and OS to run it. PrE can be either 32-bit, or 64-bit, so one might, or might not, be taking advantage of the 64-bit program and OS. Still, the processing overhead will be almost identical, it's just that the 64-bit OS can spread it around a bit.
I still recommend Scaling the large Still Images in PS, prior to Import, to keep that processing overhead as low as is possible. Scaled Still Images work just fine, and I have one Project with 3000+ Scaled Still Images, that edits just fine in PrPro, even on my older 32-bit workstation. Testing that same machine, and PrPro some years ago, I could ONLY work with up to 5 - 4096 x 4096 Stills, before things ground to a crawl.
Now, Adobe AfterEffects handles large Still Images differently, so I just moved that test Project to AE, and added another 20 large Images, which edited just fine. IIRC, AE can handle Still Images up to 10K x 10K pixels, and that might have gone up, as of CS 5.
Good luck, and hope that helps,
Hunt

In PI 7.1 better performance is reached using RFC or Proxy?

Hello Experts,
As with PI 7.1 which one would be better option to have better performance?
1)Proxy which goes through the Integration Engine by omiting Advance adaptor Engine
2)RFC which goes through the AAE by omiting Integration Engine
As we know there are alot of advantages of Proxies over RFC:
1. Proxy communication always by passes the Adapter Engine and will directly interact with the application system and Integration engine. So it will give us better performance.
2. Proxies communicate with the XI server by means of native SOAP calls over HTTP.
3. Easy to handle messages with ABAP programming if it is ABAP Proxy .
4. Proxy is good for large volumes of data. we can catch and persist the errors ( both system & application fault ) which was generated by Proxy setting.
Thanks in Advance
Rajeev

Hey
More than the performance,its a question of requirement.
There are several restrictions which you need to consider before using AAE.To name a few
IDOC,HHTP adapter wont be available
No support for ABAP mapping
No support for BPM
No support for proxy
No support for Multimapping,content based routing ( in first release)
So if you want to use any of the above you cant use AAE in first place.but performance is significantly improved,upto 4 times better that simple AE-IE
/people/william.li/blog/2008/01/10/advanced-adapter-engine-configuration-in-pi-71
check the above blog and the article mentioned in it.
Now coming to proxy,it supports all the above and performance is not that bad either.
so it all boils down to what your requirements are:)
Thanks
Aamir

Liquify & poor performance (scratch drive use)

Hi,
(Firstly, I'm an ex programmer, so fairly technical...)
I've recently been looking into the performance of the liquify filter in Photoshop CS4 11.0.1 on my i7-950, Vista64, 64 bit photoshop, 12Gb RAM. It seems to "stall" for a second or two after certain brush strokes. Other people on the internet have reported similar things.
I've come to the conclusion that the Liquify filter has a fundamental issue, as described below. Firstly, here's what I've noticed:
I'm liquifying a large image (5000 pixels deep) using a large brush (1500 pixels).
When I do a few liquify brush strokes with the push tool, I notice that liquify stalls for a few seconds.
Vista performance monitor tells me that Photoshop is writing a large amount of data to a file on my F drive, which is NOT the drive I've set to be my scratch disk (my scratch disk is Y drive - a fast raptor)
What I believe is happening (this is my guess) is, since Photoshop 7.0, Liquify gained multiple undo states. In the implementation of this, the developers chose to get Liquify to not use the scratch disk that Photoshop does, but instead to choose the largest drive it can find to use to save history states. My evidence for this is that some people with network and USB drives have to disconnect them in order to get liquify to perform well after you lift the mouse button and my F drive is the joint largest I have in my machine. I've also noticed that if you use a 1500 size brush on a SMALL file (like 1500 on it's largest axis) you don't get the same stall - which suggests to me that the history states system saves the entire image (presumably as well as the mesh) in order to speed up the undo.
This problem as described doesn't appear to me anything to do with:
RAM - I have 12Gb on Vista64 and photoshop64 and set photoshop to use 6Gb of that. The photoshop file is a single layer file only at 16bit.
Processor speed - I'm on an i7 950.
OpenGL settings - it's only when I lift the mouse button after several mouse operations that the problem happens. I've also tried switching that off.
History states settings in photoshop - I've tried setting it to one.
I've checked TEMP emvironment variables and virtual memory settings. Neither is specifiying the F drive.
Has anyone else seen this? Can you reproduce it using these steps:
Load a PSD (preferably 16 bit, single layer)
Resize it to over 5000 pixels on it's largest axis.
Start liquify
Change the brush size to 1500 pixels
Do a number of small push brush strokes
After a few, you should notice a small stall
If you can, get the resource monitor up in vista: task manager -> choose "performance" tab -> Click "Resource monitor" button -> open "disk" dropdown -> click on "write b/min" to show you the programs accessing the most disk. This should show you photoshop (liquify presumably) saving a large amount of data to a drive you never told it to use.
I'm quite happy to be wrong with any or all of my guesswork, assumptions and conclusions and would be delighted if anyone has a solution for this - other than the usual "resize, save mesh, load mesh" option to speed up liquify - I have 100 files to liquify and it's just too slow
Thanks everyone in advance for your thoughts
Phil
Finally here's some links which show similar things:
http://www.realgeek.com/forums/photoshop-cs4-liquify-tool-issue-472605.html
http://www.xpertgurus.com/showthread.php?t=171454
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/754197/0

Here is what someone else said about the issue:
"When people on here say Photoshop is no longer accessing the scratchdisk as they have lots of ram, are they SURE? I initially thought it was odd when a noise I hadn't noticed before (More than likely due to having loud music on whilst editing) when using alt+click to hide/show all layers was infact my hardrives seeking. It's almost inaudible but I tend to have very sensitive hearing.
So, i'm just working on a large 120 scan building up my layers as you do, and I go to liquify a section of the image. Now it's a large image and even though my PC is fast I don't expect it to absoultely blitz everything I throw at it, and liquify is typically a pretty crap part of Photoshop for speed anyway. So out of curiosity I open up task manager to see what my CPU usage is like.. bouncing along the bottom, jumping upto 25/30% every so often, usually when making larger adjustments, felt happy, and clicked OK.
Something made me open up Resource Monitor and noticed the hardrive jumping upto 180mb/s usage. Expand the view and it is indeed Photoshop absolutely tanning the hardrive. All the while my Ram usage is at around 5GB.
So, if this is indeed normal, a word of advice folks Invest in a RAID0 scratchdisk volume if you do large edits on large files.. Because photoshop seems to prioritize the scratchdisk before ram in some cases. If this is not normal or doesn't happen to you, please state specs, PS version, settings etc, tar.
For those interested, computer is a 3.2ghz Quad, 16GB of ram, RAID0 array for OS (Which is also the scratchdisk), and Photoshop CS4 64-bit ram usage is set at 70%, Cache Levels 6, History states 20. "
It's from one of the links in my original post.. The thing that I seem to have found that others have not spotted in my investigations is that Liquify is using any disk that it wants and (so far) there doesn't seem to be a way to tell it to use your specified scratch disk.

Performance monitor reports and graphs don't show all the counters that were captured

I've run into an odd behavior of performance monitor that I haven't been able to clear up yet: after I run a data collector set, the resulting report only shows a partial list of the counters that I captured, and so does the graph of that report (but different
items).
For instance, I chose the following counters for the data collector set:
\PhysicalDisk(*)\% Idle Time
\PhysicalDisk(*)\Avg. Disk Queue Length
\PhysicalDisk(*)\Avg. Disk sec/Read
\PhysicalDisk(*)\Avg. Disk sec/Write
When the data collection ends, the report that gets displayed shows all those counters for _Total instance and C:, but then E: only shows % Idle Time and Avg. Disk Queue Length. That's it, the report ends there, even though I also have F: and V: drives on
this server.
If I choose to view the graph of this data collection, it only shows those four counters for the _Total instance.
It took me a while to realize that all the data is being captured, but it's just the display that is truncated. If I view the folder then open the report.html, it actually shows all the data. Same with the graphs. If I select to add counters and add
all the missing counters, they are displayed.
I have searched high and low but haven't been able to find more than one post at ServerFault where someone had a similar issue, but no real solution or cause was provided, so I was hoping that someone here might have an idea.
I also found a variety of articles about missing counters due to registry settings or because the counters needed to be reset, but that's a different issue that doesn't apply in my case. By the way, this is on a windows server 2012 R2 VM (file server).

Hi SomeAdmin,
The counter missing often caused by the related registry value is corrupted, please first refer the following related KB then perform a fix then monitor the issue again.
Event ID 3012 — Performance Counter Loading
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc775053(v=ws.10).aspx
More information:
Overview of Performance Monitoring
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc958257.aspx
PerfGuide: Analyzing Poor Disk Response Times
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/1516.perfguide-analyzing-poor-disk-response-times.aspx
Analyzing Storage Performance using the Windows Performance Analysis ToolKit (WPT)
http://blogs.technet.com/b/robertsmith/archive/2012/02/07/analyzing-storage-performance-using-the-windows-performance-toolkit.aspx
I’m glad to be of help to you!
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Performance Monitor :SOAPtoSOAP using AAE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for