Performance problem with report query

Hi,
I am encountering a performance issue with a page returning a report.
I have a page that has a region which joins 2 tables. One table has about 220,00 rows, while the other contains roughly 60,000 rows. In the region source of the report region, the query includes join condition with local variables. For example, the page is page 70, and some join conditions are:
and a.id=:P70_ID
and a.name like :P70_NAME
I run the query that returns a large number of rows from sqlplus, and it takes less than 30 sec to complete.
When I run the page, the report took about 3 minutes to return.
In this case, :P70_NAME is initialized to '%' on the page.
I then tried to substitute variable value directly in the query:
and a.id=1000
and a.name like '%'
this time the report returned in about 30 sec.
I then tried another thing which specified the region as "PL/SQL Function returning sql query", and modified the region as follows:
l_sql := '.......';
l_sql := l_sql || 'and a.id=' || v('P70_ID')
and similar substituting :P70_NAME to v('P70_NAME') and append its value to the l_sql string.
The report query page also returned in 30 sec.
Is there any known performance issue with using the bind variable (:PXX_XXX) in the report region?

If you are able.. flush the shared_pool, run your
report then query the v$sql_area or v$sql_text tables.
Or do a google query and look up Cary Milsap's piece on enabling extended trace .. there is your sure fire way of finding the problem sql. I am still learning htmldb but is there a way to alter session enable trace in some pre-query block?

Similar Messages

Problem with Report Query

I have tested the integration of Apex3.0 and BI Publisher via Report Query.
This works very well, however I want to create a hierarchical XML document via the following Query:
select a.id,
a.persoonsnr,
a.volgnr_dvb,
a.jaar,
a.naam,
a.code_sagitta,
a.status,
a.invgebruiker,
a.invdatum,
a.mutgebruiker,
a.mutdatum,
cursor (
select w.afspraken
from hri_opmwerkresult w) as owr
from hri_prsactiviteiten a
I get the error message ORA-00932 inconsistent datatypes expected number got curser
Is there a work around to create a report-query with master-detail info?

Anyone?

Performance Problem with SQL Query

Hi
I have a SQL Query (say, SSS) which runs quite fast when I run it from TOAD.
But when the same query is being used as
INSERT INTO <table> VALUES <SSS>;
It is taking hours to complete.
The Original Query(OSQ) was changed to this SQL query(SSS) for Performance improvement.
The Cost has also improved quite a lot from OSQ to SSS. But when SSS runs from inside a procedure it is taking the same long hours as OSQ used to take.
Please help ASAP as it needs to get fixed.
Thanks
Arnab

SELECT SRM.ID PROJECT_ID,
SRM.UNIQUE_NAME PROJECT_CODE,
ODFP.GS_FINANCE_PROJ_CODE,
ODFP.GS_PRODUCT_CODE,
ODFP.GS_CUSTOMER,
ODFP.GS_LEGAL_ENT_REF,
ODF_PRJ_TYPE.NAME GS_PROJ_TYPE,
ODF_SRC_SYS.NAME GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,
RESM.FIRST_NAME||' '||RESM.LAST_NAME GS_PROJECT_MANAGER,
ODFP.GS_LEG_PROJ_NUM,
ODFP.GS_SUPP_DOC ,
ODFP.GS_REQUEST_ID ,
ODFP.GS_CONTRACT ,
ODFP.GS_SIEBEL_REF,
DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,PRJP.bdgt_cst_total, budg.lab_budg)LAB_BDGT,
DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,0,budg.nli_budg)NLI_BDGT,
(DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,PRJP.bdgt_cst_total, budg.lab_budg))+(DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,0,budg.nli_budg)) sum_lab_nonlab_budg,
frct.LABOUR,
frct.NON_LABOUR,
frct.LABOUR+frct.NON_LABOUR FORCAST_TOT_SUM,
gfr.code GFR_CODE,
odfp.gs_rev_recognition,
rev_rec.NAME gs_rev_recognition,
DECODE(odfp.gs_prevent_reqtxn,1,'YES','0','NO','NO'),
GS_PROGTYPE.NAME,
COMM_APPR.UNIQUE_NAME COMM_APPROVER_EIN,
COMM_APPR.FIRST_NAME||' '||COMM_APPR.LAST_NAME COMM_APPROVER_NAME,
PR_APPR.UNIQUE_NAME PR_APPROVER_EIN,
PR_APPR.FIRST_NAME||' '||PR_APPR.LAST_NAME PR_APPROVER_NAME,
ODFP.GS_BILL_BUD,
frct.FRCST_REVENUE TOTAL_FRC_REVENUE,
actuals.LABOUR_ACTUALS,
actuals.NL_ACTUALS,
-- get_wip_totalcost(prjp.prid,'L') LABOUR_ACTUALS,
-- get_wip_totalcost(prjp.prid,'M') NL_ACTUALS,
ODFP.GS_ASS_PRODUCT_CODE,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.ID GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_ID,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.UNIQUE_NAME GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_CODE,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.name GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_NAME,
DECODE( NVL(ODFP.GS_FIN_TEMPLATE,0) ,0,'NO',1,'YES') GS_FIN_TEMPLATE,
ODF_PRJ_TYPE.LOOKUP_CODE GS_PROJ_TYPE
FROM PROJECTS SRM,
J_PROJECTS PRJP,
A_PROJECT ODFP,
RESOURCES RESM,
s_gfr gfr,
RESOURCES PROJ_ACCT,
RESOURCES COMM_APPR,
RESOURCES PR_APPR,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_PROJECT_TYPE'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') ODF_PRJ_TYPE,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') ODF_SRC_SYS,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_PROG_TYPE'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS')GS_PROGTYPE,
(SELECT odf_parent_id
,SUM(gs_lab_budg) lab_budg
,SUM(gs_nl_budg) nli_budg
FROM T_CHANGES
WHERE gs_status='APPR'
GROUP BY odf_parent_id) budg,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_REV_RECOGNITION'
AND LOOKUP.ID = CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') rev_rec,
(SELECT FRCP1.project_id,
NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN srmr.resource_type=0 THEN for_val.cost ELSE NULL END),0) AS LABOUR,
NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN srmr.resource_type <> 0 THEN for_val.cost ELSE NULL END),0) AS NON_LABOUR,
NVL(SUM(for_val.revenue),0) AS FRCST_REVENUE
FROM T_PROPERTIES FRCP1,
T_DETAILS FOR_DET,
RESOURCES SRMR,
T_VALUES FOR_VAL
WHERE (FRCP1.project_id, revision) IN (SELECT project_id, MAX(revision)
FROM T_PROPERTIES FRCP
WHERE FRCP.status=2
AND FRCP.PERIOD_TYPE='SEMI_MONTHLY'
GROUP BY project_id)
AND FRCP1.PERIOD_TYPE='SEMI_MONTHLY'
AND FOR_DET.forecast_id=frcp1.id
AND SRMR.id(+)=FOR_DET.detail_id
AND FOR_VAL.currency_type='BILLING'
AND FOR_VAL.forecast_details_id=FOR_DET.ID
GROUP BY FRCP1.project_id) frct,
(SELECT srmp.id
,NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN wip.transtype='L' THEN WIPVAL.TOTALCOST ELSE NULL END),0) AS LABOUR_ACTUALS
,NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN wip.transtype='M' THEN WIPVAL.TOTALCOST ELSE NULL END),0) AS NL_ACTUALS
FROM A_WIP WIP
,om_periods biz
,P_VALUES WIPVAL
,PROJECTS SRMP
,A_PROJECT ODF
WHERE biz.period_type ='SEMI_MONTHLY'
AND TRUNC(wip.TRANSDATE) BETWEEN biz.start_date AND biz.end_date
AND WIP.TRANSNO=WIPVAL.TRANSNO
AND WIPVAL.CURRENCY_TYPE='BILLING'
AND SRMP.UNIQUE_NAME=WIP.PROJECT_CODE
AND SRMP.ID=ODF.ID
AND UPPER(ODF.partition_code)='GLOBAL'
AND UPPER(WIP.external_id) <> 'SPREADSHEET'
GROUP BY srmp.id) actuals,
RESOURCES BUD_HOLDER,
PROJECTS PROJ_TEMPLATE
WHERE SRM.ID = PRJP.PRID
AND ODFP.ID=PRJP.PRID
AND ODFP.PARTITION_CODE='GLOBAL'
AND RESM.id(+)=prjp.manager_id
AND ODFP.GS_PROJECT_TYPE = ODF_PRJ_TYPE.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM = ODF_SRC_SYS.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_prog_type = GS_PROGTYPE.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND budg.odf_parent_id(+)=SRM.ID
AND frct.project_id(+) = prjp.prid
AND ODFP.gs_risk_gfr=gfr.code(+)
AND ODFP.GS_REV_RECOGNITION=rev_rec.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_PROJ_ACCT = PROJ_ACCT.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_COMM_APPR = COMM_APPR.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_PR_APPR = PR_APPR.ID(+)
AND actuals.id(+) = prjp.prid -- Arnab
AND ODFP.GS_BUDGET_HOLDER=BUD_HOLDER.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_TEMPLATE_USED=PROJ_TEMPLATE.ID(+)
The above is OSQ with cost 45000. ... takes 1-1.5 hours through Toad
SELECT SRM.ID PROJECT_ID,
SRM.UNIQUE_NAME PROJECT_CODE,
ODFP.GS_FINANCE_PROJ_CODE,
ODFP.GS_PRODUCT_CODE,
ODFP.GS_CUSTOMER,
ODFP.GS_LEGAL_ENT_REF,
ODF_PRJ_TYPE.NAME GS_PROJ_TYPE,
ODF_SRC_SYS.NAME GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,
RESM.FIRST_NAME||' '||RESM.LAST_NAME GS_PROJECT_MANAGER,
ODFP.GS_LEG_PROJ_NUM,
ODFP.GS_SUPP_DOC ,
ODFP.GS_REQUEST_ID ,
ODFP.GS_CONTRACT ,
ODFP.GS_SIEBEL_REF,
DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,PRJP.bdgt_cst_total, budg.lab_budg)LAB_BDGT,
DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,0,budg.nli_budg)NLI_BDGT,
(DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,PRJP.bdgt_cst_total, budg.lab_budg))+(DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,0,budg.nli_budg)) sum_lab_nonlab_budg,
frct.LABOUR,
frct.NON_LABOUR,
frct.LABOUR+frct.NON_LABOUR FORCAST_TOT_SUM,
gfr.code GFR_CODE,
odfp.gs_rev_recognition,
rev_rec.NAME gs_rev_recognition,
DECODE(odfp.gs_prevent_reqtxn,1,'YES','0','NO','NO'),
GS_PROGTYPE.NAME,
COMM_APPR.UNIQUE_NAME COMM_APPROVER_EIN,
COMM_APPR.FIRST_NAME||' '||COMM_APPR.LAST_NAME COMM_APPROVER_NAME,
PR_APPR.UNIQUE_NAME PR_APPROVER_EIN,
PR_APPR.FIRST_NAME||' '||PR_APPR.LAST_NAME PR_APPROVER_NAME,
ODFP.GS_BILL_BUD,
frct.FRCST_REVENUE TOTAL_FRC_REVENUE,
-- actuals.LABOUR_ACTUALS, -- Arnab
-- actuals.NL_ACTUALS, -- Arnab
get_wip_totalcost(prjp.prid,'L') LABOUR_ACTUALS, -- Arnab
get_wip_totalcost(prjp.prid,'M') NL_ACTUALS, -- Arnab
ODFP.GS_ASS_PRODUCT_CODE,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.ID GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_ID,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.UNIQUE_NAME GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_CODE,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.name GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_NAME,
DECODE( NVL(ODFP.GS_FIN_TEMPLATE,0) ,0,'NO',1,'YES') GS_FIN_TEMPLATE,
ODF_PRJ_TYPE.LOOKUP_CODE GS_PROJ_TYPE
FROM PROJECTS SRM,
J_PROJECTS PRJP,
A_PROJECT ODFP,
RESOURCES RESM,
s_gfr gfr,
RESOURCES PROJ_ACCT,
RESOURCES COMM_APPR,
RESOURCES PR_APPR,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_PROJECT_TYPE'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') ODF_PRJ_TYPE,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') ODF_SRC_SYS,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_PROG_TYPE'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS')GS_PROGTYPE,
(SELECT odf_parent_id
,SUM(gs_lab_budg) lab_budg
,SUM(gs_nl_budg) nli_budg
FROM T_CHANGES
WHERE gs_status='APPR'
GROUP BY odf_parent_id) budg,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_REV_RECOGNITION'
AND LOOKUP.ID = CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') rev_rec,
(SELECT FRCP1.project_id,
NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN srmr.resource_type=0 THEN for_val.cost ELSE NULL END),0) AS LABOUR,
NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN srmr.resource_type <> 0 THEN for_val.cost ELSE NULL END),0) AS NON_LABOUR,
NVL(SUM(for_val.revenue),0) AS FRCST_REVENUE
FROM T_PROPERTIES FRCP1,
T_DETAILS FOR_DET,
RESOURCES SRMR,
T_VALUES FOR_VAL
WHERE (FRCP1.project_id, revision) IN (SELECT project_id, MAX(revision)
FROM T_PROPERTIES FRCP
WHERE FRCP.status=2
AND FRCP.PERIOD_TYPE='SEMI_MONTHLY'
GROUP BY project_id)
AND FRCP1.PERIOD_TYPE='SEMI_MONTHLY'
AND FOR_DET.forecast_id=frcp1.id
AND SRMR.id(+)=FOR_DET.detail_id
AND FOR_VAL.currency_type='BILLING'
AND FOR_VAL.forecast_details_id=FOR_DET.ID
GROUP BY FRCP1.project_id) frct,
/* (SELECT srmp.id
,NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN wip.transtype='L' THEN WIPVAL.TOTALCOST ELSE NULL END),0) AS LABOUR_ACTUALS
,NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN wip.transtype='M' THEN WIPVAL.TOTALCOST ELSE NULL END),0) AS NL_ACTUALS
FROM A_WIP WIP
,om_periods biz
,P_VALUES WIPVAL
,PROJECTS SRMP
,A_PROJECT ODF
WHERE biz.period_type ='SEMI_MONTHLY'
AND TRUNC(wip.TRANSDATE) BETWEEN biz.start_date AND biz.end_date
AND WIP.TRANSNO=WIPVAL.TRANSNO
AND WIPVAL.CURRENCY_TYPE='BILLING'
AND SRMP.UNIQUE_NAME=WIP.PROJECT_CODE
AND SRMP.ID=ODF.ID
AND UPPER(ODF.partition_code)='GLOBAL'
AND UPPER(WIP.external_id) <> 'SPREADSHEET'
GROUP BY srmp.id) actuals, */ -- Arnab
RESOURCES BUD_HOLDER,
PROJECTS PROJ_TEMPLATE
WHERE SRM.ID = PRJP.PRID
AND ODFP.ID=PRJP.PRID
AND ODFP.PARTITION_CODE='GLOBAL'
AND RESM.id(+)=prjp.manager_id
AND ODFP.GS_PROJECT_TYPE = ODF_PRJ_TYPE.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM = ODF_SRC_SYS.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_prog_type = GS_PROGTYPE.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND budg.odf_parent_id(+)=SRM.ID
AND frct.project_id(+) = prjp.prid
AND ODFP.gs_risk_gfr=gfr.code(+)
AND ODFP.GS_REV_RECOGNITION=rev_rec.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_PROJ_ACCT = PROJ_ACCT.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_COMM_APPR = COMM_APPR.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_PR_APPR = PR_APPR.ID(+)
AND actuals.id(+) = prjp.prid Arnab
AND ODFP.GS_BUDGET_HOLDER=BUD_HOLDER.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_TEMPLATE_USED=PROJ_TEMPLATE.ID(+)
This one in SSS where "-- Arnab " are only changes .....
The cost of this 7000.....finishes in 1 - 1.5 min in Toad
This is used as INSERT INTO TABLE <Select Query> ... this was taking 1.5 Hours to run.
It was changed using BULK COLLECT - still its taking around 1.5 hours to run...
Thanks
Arnab

Performance problems with Reports 6i

Hello,
We have reports server installed on Windows NT, generating reports in html format, requested through Oracle 9iAS.
When we have approx. 20 reports being generated simultaneously, RWCGI60.exe processes start to accumulate in the task manager and do not end.
When the RWCGI60.exe started to accumulate, RWRUN60.EXE was not using any CPU time.
After some minutes, without requesting any additional reports, RWRUN60.EXE stared using 99% of CPU and evntually all the RWCGI60.exe processes were evacuated and ended.
Is there any configuration we can do to the Reports Server to handle this load?

There is a maxconnect setting in reports server configuration file. The setting allows you to control how many connections the server is able to open at any time. When more cgi executables are invoked than the maxconnect, only "maxconnect" number of cgi gets connected, other cgi will get error message and quit very quickly.
If you don't want cgi to compete your machine resource, you should run reports server in separate machine.
Thanks,
-Shaun

Performance problem with Orcacle / Crystal reports 8.5 / ASP

Hi,
I have a performance problem with reports running crystal reports 8.5 with oracle databases.
Fetching data appears to be slow. Oracle trace reports (tkprof) shows that fetchsize=1.
Fetchsize in Oracle ODBC is 15 (default).
How can I update te fetchsize in crystal reports?
I would appreciate any help.

CR XI R2 is also still available for purchase. This is the last version of CR to use the RDC. Contact sales at 866-681-3435.
Make sure the installed versin is 11.5.12.1838 - if it is not, apply SP6:
https://smpdl.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100015859952009E/crxir2win_sp6.exe
MSM:
https://smpdl.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/012002523100000634032010E/crxir2sp6_rdc_mm.zip
- Ludek
Edited by: Ludek Uher on Jan 4, 2011 10:05 AM

Performance problem with query on bkpf table

hi good morning all ,
i ahave a performance problem with a below query on bkpf table .
SELECT bukrs
           belnr
           gjahr
      FROM bkpf
      INTO TABLE ist_bkpf_temp
     WHERE budat IN s_budat.
is ther any possibility to improve the performanece by using index .
plz help me ,
thanks in advance ,
regards ,
srinivas

hi,
if u can add bukrs as input field or if u have bukrs as part of any other internal table to filter out the data u can use:
for ex:
SELECT bukrs
belnr
gjahr
FROM bkpf
INTO TABLE ist_bkpf_temp
WHERE budat IN s_budat
    and    bukrs in s_bukrs.
or
SELECT bukrs
belnr
gjahr
FROM bkpf
INTO TABLE ist_bkpf_temp
for all entries in itab
WHERE budat IN s_budat
    and bukrs = itab-bukrs.
Just see , if it is possible to do any one of the above?? It has to be verified with ur requirement.

Reporting designer - problem with insertin query

hi, I have problem with inserting query into reporting designer, when i do it there occurs metadata error and the system write check query, but query is ok, there are no variables. Have you any idea whats the problem.
thanx

I had a similar problem after "upgrading" to SAPGUI 7.10, except my failure was in the BEx Analyzer. (We are still using BW 3.5 SP 18.)
The solution I found was in SAP Note 1039191 which addresses this problem for both the Analyzer and the Query Designer, and includes a revised "wdbsPres.dll" file as a workaround. After downloading and installing this file, the problem was resolved.
BTW, I have asked SAP when this will be fixed in a future FEP, but they have so far only given me a very ambiguous reply suggesting that I try it on another PC.
Hope this helps...
Bob

Performance problem with CR SDK

Hi,
I'am currently on a customer site and I have the following problem :
The client have a performance problem with a J2EE application wich call a Crystal report with th CR SDK. To reproduce the problem on the local machine (the CR server), I have developped a little jsp page wich used the Crystal SDK to open a Crystal report on the server (this report is based on a XML data source), setting the new data source (with a new xml data flow) and refresh the report in PDF format.
The problem is that the 2 first sequences take about 5 seconde each (5 sec for the opening report and 5 seconds for the setting data source). Then the total process take about 15 seconds to open and refresh the document that is very long for a little document.
The document is a 600Ko file, the xml source is a 80Ko file.
My jsp page is directly deployed on the tomcat of the Crystal Report Server (CRXIR2 without Service Pack).
The Filestore and the MySQL database are on the CR server.
The server is a 4 quadripro (16 proc) with 16Go of RAM and is totally dedicated to Crystal Report. For the moment, there is no activity on the server (it is also used for the test).
The mains jsp orders are the followings :
IEnterpriseSession es = CrystalEnterprise.getSessionMgr().logon("administrator", "", "EDITBI:6400", "secEnterprise");
    IInfoStore infoStore = (IInfoStore) es.getService("", "InfoStore");
    IInfoObjects infoObjects = infoStore.query("SELECT * FROM CI_INFOOBJECTS WHERE SI_NAME='CPA_EV' AND SI_INSTANCE=0 ");
    IInfoObject report = (IInfoObject) infoObjects.get(0);
IReportAppFactory reportAppFactory = (IReportAppFactory)es.getService("RASReportFactory");
ReportClientDocument reportClientDoc = reportAppFactory.openDocument(report.getID(), 0, null);
IXMLDataSet xmlDataSet = new XMLDataSet();
xmlDataSet.setXMLData(new ByteArray(ligne_data_xml));
xmlDataSet.setXMLSchema(new ByteArray(ligne_schema_xml));
DatabaseController db = reportClientDoc.getDatabaseController();
db.setDataSource(xmlDataSet, "", "");
ByteArrayInputStream bt = (ByteArrayInputStream)reportClientDoc.getPrintOutputController().export(ReportExportFormat.PDF);
My question is : does this method is the good one to do this ?
Thank's in advance for your help
Best regards
Emmanuel

Hi,
My problem is not resolved and I have'nt news from the support.
If you have any idea/info, don't forget me
Thank's in advance
Emmanuel

Performance problem with Integration with COGNOS and Bex

Hi Gems
I have a performance problem with some of my queries when integrating with the COGNOS
My query is simple which gets the data for the date interval : "
From Date: 20070101
To date:20070829
When executing the query in the Bex it takes 2mins but when it is executed in the COGNOS it takes almost 10mins and above..
Any where can we debug the report how the data is sending to the cognos. Like debugging the OLEDB ..
and how to increase the performance.. of the query in the Cognos ..
Thanks in Advance
Regards
AK

Hi,
Please check the following CA Unicenter config files on the SunMC server:
- is the Event Adapter (ea-start) running ?, without these daemon no event forwarding is done the CA Unicenter nor discover from Ca unicenter is working.
How to debug:
- run ea-start in debug mode:
# /opt/SUNWsymon/SunMC-TNG/sbin/ea-start -d9
- check if the Event Adaptor is been setup,
# /var/opt/SUNWsymon/SunMC-TNG/cfg_sunmctotng
- check the CA log file
# /var/opt/SUNWsymon/SunMC-TNG/SunMCToTngAdaptorMain.log
After that is all fine check this side it explains how to discover an SunMC agent from CA Unicenter.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1101/6mgrtmkao?a=view#tngtrouble-6
Kind Regards

Performance Problems with "For all Entries" and a big internal table

We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
    WHERE
    status = 'IAI200' AND
    logdat IN gs_dat AND
    ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
Thank you!

>
Matthias Weisensel wrote:
> We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
>
>
SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
>   FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
>     WHERE
>     status = 'IAI200' AND
>     logdat IN gs_dat AND
>     ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
>
> In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
> Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
>
> Thank you!
You can't expect miracles. With over a million entries in your itab any select is going to take a bit of time. Do you really need all these records in the itab? How many records is the select bringing back? I'm assuming that you have got and are using indexes on your ZEEDMT_ZMON table.
In this situation, I'd first of all try to think of another way of running the query and restricting the amount of data, but if this were not possible I'd just run it in the background and accept that it is going to take a long time.

Performance problem with Mavericks.

Performance problem with Mavericks. My Mac is extremly slow after upgrading to Mavericks. What can i do to solve that?

If you are still experiencing slow down issues, it maybe because of a few other reasons.
Our experience with OS X upgrades, and Mavericks is no exception, is that users have installed a combination of third party software and/or hardware that is incompatible and/or is outdated that causes many negative performance issues when upgrading to a new OS X version.
Your Mac's hard drive maybe getting full.
Do you run any antivirus software on your Mac? Commercial Antivirus software can slow down and negatively impact the normal operation of OS X.
Do you have apps like MacKeeper or any other maintenance apps like CleanMyMac 1 or 2, TuneUpMyMac or anything like these apps, installed on your Mac? These types of apps, while they appear to be helpful, can do too good a job of data "cleanup" causing the potential to do serious data corruption or data deletion and render a perfectly running OS completely dead and useless leaving you with a frozen, non-functional Mac.
Your Mac may have way too many applications launching at startup/login.
Your Mac may have old, non-updated or incompatible software installed.
Your Mac could have incompatible or outdated web browser extensions, plugins or add-ons.
Your Mac could have connected third party hardware that needs updated device drivers.
It would help us to help you if we could have some more technical info about your iMac.
If you so choose, please download, install and run Etrecheck.
Etrecheck was developed as a simple Mac diagnostic report tool by a regular Apple Support forum user and technical support contributor named Etresoft. Etrecheck is a small, unobstrusive app that compiles a static snapshot of your entire Mac hardware system and installed software.
This is a free app that has been honestly created to provided help in diagnosing issues with Macs running the new OS X 10.9 Mavericks.
It is not malware and can be safely downloaded and installed onto your Mac.
http://www.etresoft.com/etrecheck
Copy/paste and post its report here in another reply thread so that we have a complete profile of your Mac's hardware and installed software so we can all help continue with your Mac performance issues.
Thank you.

Performance problem with sdn_nn - new 10g install

I am having a performance problem with sdn_nn after migrating to a new machine. The old Oracle version was 9.0.1.4. The new is 10g. The new machine is faster in general. Most (non-spatial) batch processes run in half the time. However, the below statement is radically slower. The below statement ran in 45 minutes before. On the new machine it hasn't finished after 10 hours. I am able to get a 5% sample of the customers to finish in 45 minutes.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to approach this problem? Any chance something isn't installed correctly on the new machine (the nth version of the query finishe, albeit 20 times slower)?
Appreciate any help. Thanks.
- Jack
create table nearest_store
as
select /*+ ordered */
a.customer_id,
b.store_id nearest_store,
round(mdsys.sdo_nn_distance(1),4) distance
from customers a,
stores b
where mdsys.sdo_nn(
b.geometry,
a.geometry,
'sdo_num_res=1, unit=mile',
1
) = 'TRUE'
;

Dan,
customers 110,000 (involved in this query)
stores 28,000
Here is the execution plan on the current machine:
CREATE TABLE STATEMENT cost = 81947
LOAD AS SELECT
PX COORDINATOR
PX SEND QC (RANDOM) :TQ10000
ROW NESTED LOOPS
1 1 PX BLOCK ITERATOR
1 1ROW TABLE ACCESS FULL CUSTOMERS
1 3 PARTITION RANGE ALL
1 3 TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID STORES
DOMAIN INDEX STORES_SIDX
I can't capture the execution plan on the old database. It is gone. I don't remember it being any different from the above (full scan customers, probe stores index once for each row in customers).
I am trying the query without the create table (just doing a count). I'll let you know on that one.
I am at 10.0.1.3.
Here is how I created the index:
create index stores_sidx
on stores(geometry)
indextype is mdsys.spatial_index LOCAL
Note that the stores table is partitioned by range on store type. There are three store types (each in its own partition). The query returns the nearest store of each type (three rows per customer). This is by design (based on the documented behavior of sdo_nn).
In addition to running the query without the CTAS, I am also going try running it on a different machine tonight. I let you know how that turns out.
The reason I ask about the install, is that the Database Quick Installation Guide for Solaris says this:
"If you intend to use Oracle JVM or Oracle interMedia, you must install the Oracle Database 10g Products installation type from the Companion CD. This installation optimizes the performance of those products on your system."
And, the Database Installlation Guide says:
"If you plan to use Oracle JVM or Oracle interMedia, Oracle strongly recommends that you install the natively compiled Java libraries (NCOMPs) used by those products from the Oracle Database 10g Companion CD. These libraries are required to improve the performance of the products on your platform."
Based on that, I am suspicious that maybe I have the product installed on the new machine, but not correctly (forgot to set fast=true).
Let me know if you think of anything else you'd like to see. Thanks.
- Jack

Performance problem with table COSS...

Hi
Anyone encountered performance problem with these table : COSS, COSB, COEP
Best Regards

>
gsana sana wrote:
> Hi Guru's
>
> this is the select Query which is taking much time in Production. so please help me to improve the preformance with BSEG.
>
> this is my select query:
>
> select bukrs
>               belnr
>               gjahr
>               bschl
>               koart
>               umskz
>               shkzg
>               dmbtr
>               ktosl
>               zuonr
>               sgtxt
>               kunnr
>         from bseg
>         into table gt_bseg1
>          for all entries in gt_bkpf
>        where bukrs eq p_bukrs
>          and belnr eq gt_bkpf-belnr
>          and gjahr eq p_gjahr
>          and buzei in gr_buzei
>          and bschl eq '40'
>          and ktosl ne 'BSP'.
>
> UR's
> GSANA
Hi,
This is what I know and please if any expert think its incorrect, please do correct me.
BSEG is a cluster table with BUKRS, BELNR, GJAHR and BUZEI as the key whereas other key will be stored in database as raw data thus SAP apps will need to convert that raw data first if we are using other keys in where condition. Hence, I suggest to use up to buzei in the where condition and filter other condition in internal table level like using Delete statement. Hope its help.
Regards,
Abraham

Problem with jump query

Hello ,
iam having problem with jump query when i execute the web report but the same jump query is working fine in Bex analyzer.i think there are some settings need to be done in SAP WAS for web report. if it so can anybody tell me how to maintain these settings so that i can execute the my web report.
Regards
Komal

Hi Komal,
What is the problem you are facing while executing the report.
Are you working on WAD? Explain clearly about your problem you are facing.
Regards,
KK.

: "Invalid object name '#Temp'.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly.

Hi   .
    I was creating the pass the values t in temp tables though s sis package vs2012 .
  First I was taken on executive SQL TASK.
IN EXCUTIVE SQL TASK . I was write the stored proce:
Sp;
reate procedure USP_GETEMP2333
AS
begin
Select eid,ename,dept,salary from emp
end;
create table #temp(eid int,ename varchar(20),dept varchar(20),salary int)
insert into #temp
   exec USP_GETMP02333
   go.
It was executive correctly.
I was taken another sequence container. In the sequence container iam creating one   executive sql
In 2<sup>nd</sup> excutive sql task: sql statements is
if object_id('emp_fact_sal') is not null
drop table emp_fact_sal
select eid,ename as emp_name,sal_bar=
case when salary<=5000 then 'l'
when salary >5000 and salary<=7000 then 'm'
else
'h'
end
into emp_fact_sal from #temp.
and one falt flies it was taken to designation .
iam changing all connection properties:
in oldeb connection:
in excutive sal task properties .
delay validation is true,
and retain connection maner is also true,
and package mode is 64 bit is false.
But iwas excutive in 2<sup>nd</sup> excutive ql task .
Iam getting this type of errors,
                [Execute SQL Task] Error: Executing the query " if object_id('emp_fact_sal') is not null
drop ta..." failed with the following error: "Invalid object name '#Temp'.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established
correctly.
Please help me

Arthur suggestion works but you shouldnt even be doing this on a SQL Task.
Use a data flow task. You'll have better control over the data that is being transfered and get better performance because no staging table will be used.
Just because there are clouds in the sky it doesn't mean it isn't blue. But someone will come and argue that in addition to clouds, birds, airplanes, pollution, sunsets, daltonism and nuclear bombs, all adding different colours to the sky, this
is an undocumented behavior and should not be relied upon.

Performance problem with report query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for