Performance tuning on a query

I am working on fine tuning below query.
SELECT SEGMENT1
FROM MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS
WHERE ORGANIZATION_ID = 100
AND INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = :a
MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS have 8 million records. This query is in a function that gets called probably a million times a day.
What I am thinking to do is to create a view on mtl_system_items table where organization_id = 100. Now if I use the below view, do you think the query will execute faster?
SELECT SEGMENT1
FROM MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_VIEW
WHERE INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = :a

Check your numbers of parsing for these particular query after each execution.
e.g,
SQL>SELECT * FROM(
  2  SELECT parse_calls*executions Product, parse_calls Parses
  3     ,executions Execs, sql_text FROM v$sqlarea ORDER BY 1 DESC)
  4  WHERE ROWNUM <= 50
  5* ORDER BY parses DESC
SQL> /
   PRODUCT     PARSES      EXECS SQL_TEXT
   2608960        155      16832 SELECT  apl_dnum ,COUNT(*)  "Numbers" ,SUM(q3d_amount) "Amount" ,ddate FRO
   7661664        111      69024 SELECT COUNT(*)   FROM Q3_LODGMENT_DTL  WHERE APL_DNUM = :b1
   1412853         51      27703 SELECT ZONE_DESC_SHORT   FROM ZONE_STP  WHERE ZONE_CODE = :b1
50 rows selected.If yours session_cached_cursors parameter have the capibilty to caching more SQL statements per session then it will reduce re-parsing.Though bind variables in
SQL code reduce parsing.
Check yours index exist,check out yours network flow,yours DBA gave you very nice job but there is no hard and fast thumb role to identify exactly what causes to degrade this specific query.
Khurram

Similar Messages

  • Analysis and Performance tuning of a query

    Hi gurus,
    We have few reports built on multiprovider (which is containing five basic cubes) whose response time is very slow, so i want to do some analysis to find out why they are runing very slow and also do the performance tuning.
    So where do i start and how do i start like is it from Report or multiprovider
    if its report or multiprovider please kindly guide me what are the things do i need to look for and how to correct them whether adding something or changing the data design.
    i have four reports
    1. is runing on three basic cubes
    2. is runing on all the five cubes
    3.& 4.  runing on 2 cubes
    so kindly give your inputs
    thanks and regards
    Neel

    docs on performance available in
    FAQ - The Future of SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence in the Light of the NetWeaver BI&Business Objects Roadmap
    https://service.sap.com/bi
    -> performance
    effective query on MP can be found
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b03b7f4c-c270-2910-a8b8-91e0f6d77096
    for nw2004s
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9ab011a-0e01-0010-02a1-d496b94c9c0f
    modeling on multiprovider
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/2f5aa43f-0c01-0010-a990-9641d3d4eef7
    hope this helps.

  • Performance tuning for JCDS query

    Hi All,
    I have a performance issue in following query.Any Idea how can it be improved?
        SELECT objnr udate utime
               FROM jcds
               INTO TABLE it_jcds
               WHERE objnr LIKE c_or
                AND   stat = l_tj02t
                AND   cdtcode LIKE c_co
                AND  inact = space.
    Fields          Distinct values
    CDTCODE                  111
    INACT             192
    Only one index i.e Primary Index
    UNIQUE     Index   JCDS~0 (Compute)
    Column Name                     #Distinct
    MANDT                                          3
    OBJNR                                  2.165.245
    STAT                                         100
    CHGNR                                        319
    Is 'like' statement causing the performance issue and how can it be corrected?
    Or Index can be created for this?

    You can try this: Create 2 ranges, for objnr and cdtcode and fill like:
    ra_objnr-sign = 'I'.
    ra_objnr-option = 'CP'.
    ra_objnr-low = 'OR*'.
    append ra_objnr.
    ra_code-sign = 'I'.
    ra_code-option = 'CP'.
    ra_code-low = 'CO*'.
    append ra_code.
    SELECT objnr udate utime
    FROM jcds
    INTO TABLE it_jcds
    WHERE objnr IN ra_objnr
    AND stat = l_tj02t
    AND cdtcode IN ra_code
    AND inact = space
    Regards,
    John.

  • Performance tuning for ABAP Query (created from t-cd SQ01)

    Hello all,
    We created ABAP Query report from transaction SQ01.
    But the generated report has an appropriate SQL statement which causes performance problem.
    To solve this issue, I guess the easiest way is;
    0. Give up to use it.
    1. Copy it to another object in the customer namespace.
    2. Ajust SQL statement.
    But I'm wondering if there're appropriate ways to adjust SQL statement of Query.
    Could anybody give me any better idea?
    Thank you
    Yuko

    You can try this: Create 2 ranges, for objnr and cdtcode and fill like:
    ra_objnr-sign = 'I'.
    ra_objnr-option = 'CP'.
    ra_objnr-low = 'OR*'.
    append ra_objnr.
    ra_code-sign = 'I'.
    ra_code-option = 'CP'.
    ra_code-low = 'CO*'.
    append ra_code.
    SELECT objnr udate utime
    FROM jcds
    INTO TABLE it_jcds
    WHERE objnr IN ra_objnr
    AND stat = l_tj02t
    AND cdtcode IN ra_code
    AND inact = space
    Regards,
    John.

  • Performance tuning in SQL query using join of views

    Hi,
    Am trying to tune a query of the format
    select ........ from view1,view2
    where view1.keyfield = view2.keyfield
    The base tables of the views view1 and view2 have indexes specified on 'keyfield'.
    However, when I do an explain plan of the query, Full table scan of those base tables are performed.
    Even tried using Hints in this query to force Oracle to use those indexes, but still not successful.
    Any pointers on how to tune this kind of query would be highly welcome.
    Regards,
    Baish

    If your query is really of the same form as you posted, then full table scans then a hash or merge join may be the most efficient plan.
    You are asking for all of the rows from view1 and the matching rows from view2, because of this, Oracle dedcided that the cost of full table scans using multi-block reads is cheaper than using single block reads to get the rowids from the index, then single block reads to get the rows from the table.
    FULL SCAN <> BAD
    John

  • Performance tuning of a query in Hyperion Interactive Reporting Studio.

    Hi All,
    Cud some one please tell me... what are the possible ways that one can enhance the performance of the query in Hyperion interactive Reporting studio.. ??
    Thanks & Regards,
    Raj

    Topic Order Priority...Data Model Options
    Use Hints/Directives
    Ask DBA to review the SQL Generated by IR --- TopMenu - View - Query Log

  • Performance tuning for the query

    CURSOR c_exercise_list IS
           SELECT
                  DECODE(v_mfd_mask_id ,'Y',' ',o.opt_id) opt_id,
                  DECODE(v_mfd_mask_id ,'Y',' ',o.soc_sec) soc_sec,
                  P.plan_id plan_id, E.exer_id exer_id, E.exer_num,
                  DECODE(G.sar_flag, 0, DECODE(G.plan_type, 0, '1', 1, '2', 2, '3', 3, ' ', 4,'5', 5, '6', 6, '7', 7, '8', 8, '9', '0'), ' ') option_type,
                  TO_CHAR(G.grant_dt, 'YYYYMMDD') grant_dt, TO_CHAR(E.exer_dt, 'YYYYMMDD') exer_dt,
                  E.opts_exer opts_exer,
                  E.mkt_prc   mkt_prc,
                  E.swap_prc  swap_prc,
                  E.shrs_swap shrs_swap, decode(e.exer_type,2,decode(xe.cash_partial,'Y','A','2'),TO_CHAR(E.exer_type)) exer_type,
                  E.sar_shrs  sar_shrs,
                  NVL(ROUND(((xe.sar_shrs_withld_optcost - (e.opts_exer * g.opt_prc) / e.mkt_prc) * e.mkt_prc),2),0)+e.sar_cash sar_cash,
                  NVL(f.fixed_fee1,0) fixed_fee1,
                  NVL(f.fixed_fee2,0) fixed_fee2,
                  NVL(f.fixed_fee3,0) fixed_fee3,
                  NVL(f.commission,0) commission,
                  NVL(f.sec_fee,0)    sec_fee,
                  NVL(f.fees_paid,0)  fees_paid,
                  NVL(ct.amount,0)     cash_tend,
                  E.shrs_tend  shrs_tend, G.grant_id grant_id, NVL(G.grant_cd, ' ') grant_cd,
                  NVL(xg.child_symbol,' ') child_symbol,
                  NVL(xg.opt_gain_deferred_flag,'N') defer_flag,
                  o.opt_num opt_num,
                  --XO.new_ssn,
                  DECODE(v_mfd_mask_id ,'Y',' ',xo.new_ssn) new_ssn,
                          xo.use_new_ssn
                  ,xo.tax_verification_eligible tax_verification_eligible
                  ,(SELECT TO_CHAR(MIN(settle_dt),'YYYYMMDD') FROM tb_ml_exer_upload WHERE exer_num = E.exer_num AND user_id=E.user_id AND NVL(settle_dt,TO_DATE('19000101','YYYYMMDD'))>=E.exer_dt) AS settle_dt
                  ,xe.rsu_type  AS rsu_type
                  ,xe.trfbl_det_name AS trfbl_det_name
                  ,o.user_txt1,o.user_txt2,xo.user_txt3,xo.user_txt4,xo.user_txt5,xo.user_txt6,xo.user_txt7
                  ,xo.user_txt8,xo.user_txt9,xo.user_txt10,xo.user_txt11,
                  xo.user_txt12,
                  xo.user_txt13,
                  xo.user_txt14,
                  xo.user_txt15,
                  xo.user_txt16,
                  xo.user_txt17,
                  xo.user_txt18,
                  xo.user_txt19,
                  xo.user_txt20,
                  xo.user_txt21,
                  xo.user_txt22,
                  xo.user_txt23,
                  xo.user_dt2,
                  xo.adj_dt_hire_vt_svc,
                  xo.adj_dt_hire_vt_svc_or,
                  xo.adj_dt_hire_vt_svc_or_dt,
                  xo.severance_plan_code,
                  xo.severance_begin_dt,
                  xo.severance_end_dt,
                  xo.retirement_bridging_dt
                  ,NVL(xg.pu_var_price ,0) v_pu_var_price
                  ,NVL(xe.ficamed_override,'N') v_ficmd_ovrride
                  ,NVL(xe.vest_shrs,0) v_vest_shrs
                  ,NVL(xe.client_exer_id,' ') v_client_exer_id
                  ,(CASE WHEN xg.re_tax_flag = 'Y' THEN pk_xop_reg_outbound.Fn_GetRETaxesWithheld(g.grant_num, E.exer_num, g.plan_type)
                         ELSE 'N'
                     END) re_tax_indicator -- 1.5V
                  ,xe.je_bypass_flag
                  ,xe.sar_shrs_withld_taxes   --Added for SAR july 2010 release
                  ,xe.sar_shrs_withld_optcost --Added for SAR july 2010 release
            FROM
            (SELECT exer.* FROM exercise exer WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT s.exer_num FROM suspense s
                WHERE s.exer_num = exer.exer_num AND s.user_id = exer.user_id AND exer.mkt_prc = 0))E,
                grantz G,  xop_grantz xg, optionee o, xop_optionee xo, feeschgd f, cashtendered ct, planz P,xop_exercise xe
            WHERE
                  E.grant_num  = G.grant_num
            AND   E.user_id    = G.user_id
            AND   E.opt_num    = o.opt_num
            AND   E.user_id    = o.user_id
            AND   (G.grant_num = xg.grant_num(+) AND G.user_id=xg.user_id(+))
            AND   (o.opt_num   = xo.opt_num(+)   AND o.user_id=xo.user_id(+))
            AND   E.plan_num = P.plan_num
            AND   E.user_id = P.user_id
            AND   E.exer_num = f.exer_num(+)
            AND   E.user_id = ct.user_id(+)
            AND   E.exer_num = ct.exer_num(+)
            AND   E.user_id = ct.user_id(+)
            AND   E.exer_num=xe.exer_num(+)
            AND   E.user_id=xe.user_id(+)
            AND   G.user_id = USER
            AND NOT EXISTS (
                        SELECT tv.exer_num
                          FROM tb_xop_tax_verification tv--,exercise ex
                         WHERE tv.exer_num = e.exer_num
                           AND tv.user_id = e.user_id
                           AND tv.user_id = v_cms_user
                           AND tv.status_flag IN (0,1,3,4, 5)) -- Not Processed
            ;how to tune the query to impropve the performance, any1 help me ..thanks in advance
    Edited by: BluShadow on 21-Feb-2013 08:14
    corrected {noformat}{noformat} tags. Please read {message:id=9360002} and learn how to post code correctly.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    i got CPU cost: 458.50 Elapsed time: 1542.90 so anything can tune to improve the performance, but there is no full table scan applied for none of the mentioned table. . and most of the columns are unique index scan takes place.. anybody can help me to find the solution
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE     10.2.0.4.0     Production
    TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    Edited by: 956684 on Feb 22, 2013 4:09 AM

  • Performance tuning of sql query with multiple joins

    My query takes at least half an hour to execute and the number of records returned are approx 1 lakh records.
    Structure of tables are:
    tblSession : ID,option1,option2,option3,option4,option5,option6,option7,option8,option9.
    tblOption : ID, labelID
    tblLabelDetail  : ID, LABELID, text
    optionID 1 to optionID9 are Foreign keys to table tblOption.ID
    My query is as below : 
    select 
    session.ID 
    ,session.tstamp
    ,session.score
    ,session.hid1
    ,session.hID2
    ,session.hID3
    ,session.collectionID
    ,session.consumerID
    ,session.langID
    ,cons_cust.text1 as    customCons_text1, 
    cons_cust.text2 as customCons_text2, 
    cons_cust.text3 as customCons_text3,
    cons_cust.text4 as customCons_text4,
    cons_cust.text5 as customCons_text5,
    cons_cust.text6 as customCons_text6,
    cons_cust.text7 as customCons_text7,
    cons_cust.text8 as customCons_text8,
    cons_cust.text9 as customCons_text9,
    ld_cons1.text as customCons_option1GUID, 
    ld_cons2.text as customCons_option2GUID, 
    ld_cons3.text as customCons_option3GUID, 
    ld_cons4.text as customCons_option4GUID ,
    ld_cons5.text as customCons_option5GUID, 
    ld_cons6.text as customCons_option6GUID, 
    ld_cons7.text as customCons_option7GUID, 
    ld_cons8.text as customCons_option8GUID, 
    ld_cons9.text as customCons_option9GUID,
    --session
    session_cust.text1 as  session_cust_text1, 
    session_cust.text2 as session_cust_text2, 
    session_cust.text3 as session_cust_text3,
    session_cust.text4 as session_cust_text4,
    session_cust.text5 as session_cust_text5,
    session_cust.text6 as session_cust_text6,
    session_cust.text7 as session_cust_text7,
    session_cust.text8 as session_cust_text8,
    session_cust.text9 as session_cust_text9,
    ld_sess1.text as session_cust_option1GUID, 
    ld_sess2.text as session_cust_option2GUID, 
    ld_sess3.text as session_cust_option3GUID, 
    ld_sess4.text as session_cust_option4GUID, 
    ld_sess5.text as session_cust_option5GUID, 
    ld_sess6.text as session_cust_option6GUID, 
    ld_sess7.text as session_cust_option7GUID, 
    ld_sess8.text as session_cust_option8GUID, 
    ld_sess9.text as session_cust_option9GUID, 
    session_cust.tStamp1,
    session_cust.tStamp2
    from mvSession session with (noexpand)
    inner join tblCollection c on c.ID=session.collectionID AND c.templateID = 405
    left join tblConsumer cons on cons.ID=session.consumerID and cons.sessionYM between 601 and 1412 and cons.sID=105
    left join vCustomConsumer cons_cust on cons_cust.sessionYM between 601 and 1412 and cons_cust.sID=105 and cons_cust.ID=cons.ID
    left join tbloption o_cons1 on o_cons1.id = cons_cust.option1 and  o_cons1.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_cons1 on ld_cons1.labelID = o_cons1.labelID and ld_cons1.langId = 1 and ld_cons1.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_cons2 on o_cons2.id = cons_cust.option2 and  o_cons2.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_cons2 on ld_cons2.labelID = o_cons2.labelID and ld_cons2.langId = 1 and ld_cons2.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_cons3 on o_cons3.id = cons_cust.option3 and  o_cons3.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_cons3 on ld_cons3.labelID = o_cons1.labelID and ld_cons3.langId = 1 and ld_cons3.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_cons4 on o_cons4.id = cons_cust.option4 and  o_cons4.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_cons4 on ld_cons4.labelID = o_cons4.labelID and ld_cons4.langId = 1 and ld_cons4.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_cons5 on o_cons5.id = cons_cust.option5 and  o_cons5.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_cons5 on ld_cons5.labelID = o_cons5.labelID and ld_cons5.langId = 1 and ld_cons5.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_cons6 on o_cons6.id = cons_cust.option6 and  o_cons6.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_cons6 on ld_cons6.labelID = o_cons6.labelID and ld_cons6.langId = 1 and ld_cons6.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_cons7 on o_cons7.id = cons_cust.option7 and  o_cons7.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_cons7 on ld_cons7.labelID = o_cons7.labelID and ld_cons7.langId = 1 and ld_cons7.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_cons8 on o_cons8.id = cons_cust.option8 and  o_cons8.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_cons8 on ld_cons8.labelID = o_cons8.labelID and ld_cons8.langId = 1 and ld_cons8.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_cons9 on o_cons9.id = cons_cust.option9 and  o_cons9.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_cons9 on ld_cons9.labelID = o_cons9.labelID and ld_cons9.langId = 1 and ld_cons9.eid = 107 
    left join vCustomSession session_cust on session_cust.sessionYM between 601 and 1412 and session_cust.sID=105 and session_cust.ID=session.ID
    left join tbloption o_sess1 on o_sess1.id = session_cust.option1 and  o_sess1.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_sess1 on ld_sess1.labelID = o_sess1.labelID and ld_sess1.langId = 1 and ld_sess1.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_sess2 on o_sess2.id = session_cust.option2 and  o_sess2.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_sess2 on ld_sess2.labelID = o_sess2.labelID and ld_sess2.langId = 1 and ld_sess2.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_sess3 on o_sess2.id = session_cust.option3 and  o_sess3.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_sess3 on ld_sess3.labelID = o_sess2.labelID and ld_sess3.langId = 1 and ld_sess3.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_sess4 on o_sess4.id = session_cust.option4 and  o_sess4.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_sess4 on ld_sess4.labelID = o_sess4.labelID and ld_sess4.langId = 1 and ld_sess4.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_sess5 on o_sess5.id = session_cust.option5 and  o_sess5.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_sess5 on ld_sess5.labelID = o_sess5.labelID and ld_sess5.langId = 1 and ld_sess5.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_sess6 on o_sess6.id = session_cust.option6 and  o_sess6.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_sess6 on ld_sess6.labelID = o_sess6.labelID and ld_sess6.langId = 1 and ld_sess6.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_sess7 on o_sess7.id = session_cust.option7 and  o_sess7.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_sess7 on ld_sess7.labelID = o_sess7.labelID and ld_sess7.langId = 1 and ld_sess7.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_sess8 on o_sess8.id = session_cust.option8 and  o_sess8.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_sess8 on ld_sess8.labelID = o_sess8.labelID and ld_sess8.langId = 1 and ld_sess8.eid = 107 
    left join tbloption o_sess9 on o_sess9.id = session_cust.option9 and  o_sess9.sid = 105
    left join tblLabelDetail ld_sess9 on ld_sess9.labelID = o_sess9.labelID and ld_sess9.langId = 1 and ld_sess9.eid = 107 
    where session.sID=105  and session.tStamp >= 'Sep  1 2014 12:00AM' and session.tStamp < 'Dec 12 2014 12:00AM'   
    order by session.tStamp, session.ID
    Is there a way , where i can simplify the joins with tbloption and tblLabelDetail and get my o/p in optimal time.
    Regards 

    I have headed towards another approach ie. using unpivot and then pivot.
    First i am converting option1-option9 into column , then doing  PIVOT to get back the same record . But issue is that when i am doing pivoting i am getting NULL values.
    My query is :
    select * into #t1  from
    select ID
    , option1
    , option2
    , option3
    , option4
    , option5
    , option6
    , option7
    , option8
    , option9
    from vCustomConsumer
    where sid=105
    and sessionYM = 1412 
    ) SourceTable
    UNPIVOT
       optionID FOR Col IN
        (option1 
    ,option2
    ,option3 
    ,option4 
    ,option5 
    ,option6 
    ,option7 
    ,option8 
    ,option9 )
    ) AS unpvt
    select t.ID,t.optionID,t.col,cast(ld.text as varchar(max)) as text into #t2
    from #t1 t
    left outer join tbloption o on o.ID =  t.optionID
    left outer join tblLabelDetail ld on ld.labelID = o.labelID and ld.langID=1 
    order by ID,col
    select ID,option1 
    ,option2
    ,[option3]
    ,option4 
    ,option5 
    ,option6 
    ,option7 
    ,option8 
    ,option9
    from
    select ID,optionID,col,text
    from #t2
    )up
    pivot 
    min(text)for col in 
    (option1 
    ,option2
    ,[option3]
    ,option4 
    ,option5 
    ,option6 
    ,option7 
    ,option8 
    ,option9
    )as pvt
    In my last query where i am using pivot, i am getting NULL values. When i check the data in temp table #t2 , it exists perfectly . But when pivoting i dont understand why it is returning most of the NULL values. I am getting data for only one column in single
    row.
    Below are some rows from result set finally obtained after pivoting :
    ID
    option1
    option2
    option3
    option4
    option5
    option6
    option7
    option8
    option9
    62949026
    NULL
    0 to 200 seconds
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    62966000
    NULL
    NULL
    4
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    62966032
    NULL
    NULL
    4
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    63090372
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    EN
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    63090375
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    EN
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    NULL
    Thanks,

  • Issue with performance tuning of a query

    Hi,
    I have a query which is in the below format
    select a.* from
    (inline query) a,
    (inline query b)
    where a.id = b.id;
    Now i want the inline query b to be executed first and then joined with a.
    How can i achieve the same.
    Let me know if more information is required.

    h4. NO_MERGE - This will allow inline query executing first
    h4. LEADING(b) and USE_NL(b a) - We want to make driving table as "b" and then nest loop with "a"
    SELECT /*+ LEADING(b) USE_NL(b a) */ a.*
    FROM   (SELECT /*+ NO_MERGE */ LEVEL ID FROM dual CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 100 ) a,
           (SELECT /*+ NO_MERGE */ LEVEL ID FROM dual CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 10  ) b
    WHERE  a.id = b.id;
    | Id  | Operation                      | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |      |     1 |    26 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  NESTED LOOPS                  |      |     1 |    26 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   2 |   VIEW                         |      |     1 |    13 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    CONNECT BY WITHOUT FILTERING|      |       |       |            |          |
    |   4 |     FAST DUAL                  |      |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  5 |   VIEW                         |      |     1 |    13 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  6 |    CONNECT BY WITHOUT FILTERING|      |       |       |            |          |
    |   7 |     FAST DUAL                  |      |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       3 - filter(LEVEL<=10)
       5 - filter("A"."ID"="B"."ID")
       6 - filter(LEVEL<=100)
    {code}                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Performance tuning in Query

    Dear All,
    My client wants to do the performance tuning in a query where it has the Global structure of 300 CKF & 300 RKF.
    They dont want to touch the MP, all they want to do some performance tuning through the front end without touching the Multiprovider.
    The CKF is little bit tricky where in Each CKF has 28 RKF and In each RKF atleast 2 variables are used an with hierarchy restrictions. The query is taking 30 - 40 min to execute. Kindly guide me how to handle this.
    Regards,
    Suman Thangadurai.

    HI,
    Improving query performance u2013
    -     Generate index.
    -     Build query on multiprovider and better use Constant Selection Function to bring infoset functionality to Multiprovider.
    -     Make your query more dynamic using variables.
    -     Do partitioning on IC when you have restriction on 0CALMONTH.
    -     Use more free charecterstics.
    -     Use include than exclude at Bex level.
    -     Utilize Cache mode and Read mode functions.
    Regards,
    rvc

  • Performance tunning of a query

    Hello gurus,
    I m trying to improve the performance of the query ...
    here is the link ...i posted in SQL and PL/SQL section
    Performance tuning of the query
    Any direction or help is greatly appriciated. Thank you!!!

    user642297 wrote:
    Any thoughts on this thread ?? Thank you!!My thoughts are you shouldn't cross post. It only confuses things. Pick the forum you think best matches your issue, and stick with it.

  • How to find quickly what's wrong with the performance of a BW Query?

    Hi All,
    After a long time, I had to work on performance tuning of a query, Version BI 7.0 EHP 1, SP7.
    Compression in done, BI Stats are running, showing that OLAP time is high almost 70%, compared to 20% DB Read time.
    Aggregates cannot be created due to the nature of the cube, BIA is out of scope.
    How to find quickly, step by step, what's wrong with a particular query.
    Thanks in advance,
    Best Regards,
    - Shashi

    Hi Sashi ,
    1. OLAP time is more, you need to  increase OLAP cache, you have different options for the query in RSRT t-code..
    Select properties which makes to store the query result set in OLAP Cache for permanent.
    Doc for the same :
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/44A46FE1-6DC0-4F2C-A8CB-A1BB45DF0186/FinalDownload/DownloadId-ED38793C4C172FE2AFFDE727E36B3991/44A46FE1-6DC0-4F2C-A8CB-A1BB45DF0186/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f048c590-31a4-2c10-8599-bd01fabb93d4?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
    2.Use only less no of Characteristics in the initial report. Place remaining in Free characteristics.
    3.You need to check the query .It cmod code exist for any variable or your query have lots of navigational attributes then try to check for code efficiency .
    4.If Front End time more then try to avoid the more characteristics in displaying the query result.
    5.Use authorization objects on queries if possible .That will reduce data amount .
    6.Use query read mode and  global structures as when possible.
    Some helpful links :
    http://www.tli-usa.com/download/Expert_Tips_and_New_Techniques_for_Optimizing_Data_Load_and_Query_Performance__Part_Two_.pdf
    how to increase the performance
    Aggregates in SAP BW
    bw statistics
    What is the use of cube partition?
    Create indices before or after compression
    Regards,
    Jaya Tiwari

  • Tuning SAP BW query performance

    Dear experts,
    I have a question regarding as the performance of a BW query.
    It takes 10 minutes to display about 23 thousands lines.
    This query read the data from an ODS object.
    According to the "where" clause in the "select" statement monitored via Oracle session when the query was running, I created an index for this ODS object.
    After rerunning the query, I found that the index had been taken by Oracle in reading this table (estimated cost is reduced to 2 from about 3000).
    However, it takes the same time as before.
    Is there any other reason or other factors that I should consider in tuning the performance of this query?K
    Thanks in advance

    check out tuning documents at [FAQ - The Future of SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence in the Light of the NetWeaver BI&Business Objects Roadmap]

  • Performance Tuning Query on Large Tables

    Hi All,
    I am new to the forums and have a very specic use case which requires performance tuning, but there are some limitations on what changes I am actualy able to make to the underlying data. Essentially I have two tables which contain what should be identical data, but for reasons of a less than optimal operational nature, the datasets are different in a number of ways.
    Essentially I am querying call record detail data. Table 1 (refered to in my test code as TIME_TEST) is what I want to consider the master data, or the "ultimate truth" if you will. Table one contains the CALLED_NUMBER which is always in a consistent format. It also contains the CALLED_DATE_TIME and DURATION (in seconds).
    Table 2 (TIME_TEST_COMPARE) is a reconciliation table taken from a different source but there is no consistent unique identifiers or PK-FK relations. This table contains a wide array of differing CALLED_NUMBER formats, hugely different to that in the master table. There is also scope that the time stamp may be out by up to 30 seconds, crazy I know, but that's just the way it is and I have no control over the source of this data. Finally the duration (in seconds) can be out by up to 5 seconds +/-.
    I want to create a join returning all of the master data and matching the master table to the reconciliation table on CALLED_NUMBER / CALL_DATE_TIME / DURATION. I have written the query which works from a logi perspective but it performs very badly (master table = 200,000 records, rec table = 6,000,000+ records). I am able to add partitions (currently the tables are partitioned by month of CALL_DATE_TIME) and can also apply indexes. I cannot make any changes at this time to the ETL process loading the data into these tables.
    I paste below the create table and insert scripts to recreate my scenario & the query that I am using. Any practical suggestions for query / table optimisation would be greatly appreciated.
    Kind regards
    Mike
    -------------- NOTE: ALL DATA HAS BEEN DE-SENSITISED
    /* --- CODE TO CREATE AND POPULATE TEST TABLES ---- */
    --CREATE MAIN "TIME_TEST" TABLE: THIS TABLE HOLDS CALLED NUMBERS IN A SPECIFIED/PRE-DEFINED FORMAT
    CREATE TABLE TIME_TEST ( CALLED_NUMBER VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
                                            CALLED_DATE_TIME DATE, DURATION NUMBER );
    COMMIT;
    -- CREATE THE COMPARISON TABLE "TIME_TEST_COMPARE": THIS TABLE HOLDS WHAT SHOULD BE (BUT ISN'T) IDENTICAL CALL DATA.
    -- THE DATA CONTAINS DIFFERING NUMBER FORMATS, SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT CALL TIMES (ALLOW +/-60 SECONDS - THIS IS FOR A GOOD, ALBEIT UNHELPFUL, REASON)
    -- AND DURATIONS (ALLOW +/- 5 SECS)                                        
    CREATE TABLE TIME_TEST_COMPARE ( CALLED_NUMBER VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
                                       CALLED_DATE_TIME DATE, DURATION NUMBER )                                        
    COMMIT;
    --CREATE INSERT DATA FOR THE MAIN TEST TIME TABLE
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '7721345675', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 06:10:21 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 202);
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '7721345675', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 08:10:21 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 19);
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '7721345675', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 07:10:21 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 35);
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '7721345675', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 09:10:21 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 30);
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '7721345675', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 06:18:47 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 6);
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '7721345675', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 06:20:21 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 20);
    COMMIT;
    -- CREATE INSERT DATA FOR THE TABLE WHICH NEEDS TO BE COMPARED:
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST_COMPARE ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '7721345675', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 06:10:51 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 200);
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST_COMPARE ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '00447721345675', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 08:10:59 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 21);
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST_COMPARE ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '07721345675', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 07:11:20 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 33);
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST_COMPARE ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '+447721345675', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 09:10:01 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'), 33);
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST_COMPARE ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '+447721345675#181345', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 06:18:35 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM')
    , 6);
    INSERT INTO TIME_TEST_COMPARE ( CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME,
    DURATION ) VALUES (
    '004477213456759777799', TO_DATE( '11/09/2011 06:19:58 AM', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM')
    , 17);
    COMMIT;
    /* --- QUERY TO UNDERTAKE MATCHING WHICH REQUIRES OPTIMISATION --------- */
    SELECT MAIN.CALLED_NUMBER AS MAIN_CALLED_NUMBER, MAIN.CALLED_DATE_TIME AS MAIN_CALL_DATE_TIME, MAIN.DURATION AS MAIN_DURATION,
         COMPARE.CALLED_NUMBER AS COMPARE_CALLED_NUMBER,COMPARE.CALLED_DATE_TIME AS COMPARE_CALLED_DATE_TIME,
         COMPARE.DURATION COMPARE_DURATION     
    FROM
    SELECT CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME, DURATION
    FROM TIME_TEST
    ) MAIN
    LEFT JOIN
    SELECT CALLED_NUMBER, CALLED_DATE_TIME, DURATION
    FROM TIME_TEST_COMPARE
    ) COMPARE
    ON INSTR(COMPARE.CALLED_NUMBER,MAIN.CALLED_NUMBER)<> 0
    AND MAIN.CALLED_DATE_TIME BETWEEN COMPARE.CALLED_DATE_TIME-(60/86400) AND COMPARE.CALLED_DATE_TIME+(60/86400)
    AND MAIN.DURATION BETWEEN MAIN.DURATION-(5/86400) AND MAIN.DURATION+(5/86400);

    What does your execution plan look like?

  • VAL_FIELD selection to determine RSDRI or MDX query: performance tuning

    according to on of the HTG I am working on performance tuning. one of the tip is to try to query base members by using BAS(xxx) in the expension pane of BPC report.
    I did so and found an interesting issue in one of the COPA report.
    with income statement, when I choose one node gross_profit, saying BAS(GROSS_PROFIT), it generates RSDRI query as I can see in UJSTAT. when I choose its parent, BAS(DIRECT_INCOME), it generates MDX query!
    I checked DIRECT_INCOME has three members, GROSS_PROFIT, SGA, REV_OTHER. , none of them has any formulars.
    in stead of calling BAS(DIRECT_INCOME), I called BAS(GROSS_PROFIT),BAS(SGA),BAS(REV_OTHER), I got RSDRI query again.
    so in smmary,
    BAS(PARENT) =>MDX query.
    BAS(CHILD1)=>RSDRI query.
    BAS(CHILD2)=>RSDRI query.
    BAS(CHILD3)=>RSDRI query.
    BAS(CHILD1),BAS(CHILD2),BAS(CHILD3)=>RSDRI query
    I know VAL_FIELD is SAP reserved name for BPC dimensions.  my question is why BAS(PARENT) =>MDX query.?
    interestingly I can repeat this behavior in my system. my intention is to always get RSDRI query,
    George

    Ok - it turns out that Crystal Reports disregards BEx Query variables when put in the Default Values section of the filter selection. 
    I had mine there and even though CR prompted me for the variables AND the SQL statement it generated had an INCLUDE statement with hose variables I could see by my result set that it still returned everything in the cube as if there was no restriction on Plant for instance.
    I should have paid more attention to the Info message I got in the BEx Query Designed.  It specifically states that the "Variable located in Default Values will be ignored in the MDX Access".
    After moving the variables to the Characteristic Restrictions my report worked as expected.  The slow response time is still an issue but at least it's not compounded by trying to retrieve all records in the cube while I'm expecting less than 2k.
    Hope this helps someone else

Maybe you are looking for

  • TS3694 i am trying to update my iphone 4 from version 4.3.3 to version 6.1.3. it stops at "unknown error #3194". please help me. what do i need to do now?

    please help me update my iphone 4 from version 4.3.3 to version 6.x.x. i am having problems completing the update. it stops and says "unknown error # 3194".

  • How do you choose different audio streams?

    If you have an "audio options" menu, and you have the choice between Ac3 and DTS, how would you link the different audio tracks to the buttons in the sub menu. also, how do you link the tracks to the audio button on you dvd players controller? thanks

  • Graphics extension

    im naveen,i have taken lenovo essential series G570 before a month,with i5 processor.i have taken it with intel HD graphics,and with DOS,no extra graphics card.now i want to have extra graphics card of 1GB,can i have it on my laptop?????plzzzzz tell

  • How to use URL?

    Hi everyone, I have a problem constructing URL with ftp protocol. If I use: new URL("ftp://userName:pwd@"+ipAddress+filePath), I can get the file, but if I use new URL("ftp://userName:@"+ipAddress+filePath), I can't get the file. In this case, I want

  • Indian Withholding Taxes Doubt

    Can any one say me on what basis is that Business Places for a Company code be Created? is TIN Number and TAN Number serve the same purpose for a Company code Configuration ? Best Regards,