Permission and User Issues
I have an iMac and an Apple laptop. I want them to talk to each other. I'm the only user on a home network. On my laptop I find my desktop and see the files I want but there is a red "ban" or "no access" circle on it. When I click on properties it says "everyone" has "no access". I want to have access to that content. When I click on the "+" it gives me a window that says "Enter the name of the user or group you would like to add". I take that to be my account name on either my desktop or laptop. Neither one of those names work - "The name you entered is not valid. Please try again." I don't know of any other names or users or groups. In sharing I gave what I thought was universal access to both of my account names. HOW DO I UNLOCK THESE FOLDERS SO THAT I CAN USE THEIR CONTENT "READ AND WRITE" WITHIN MY HOME NETWORK? Thanks, CraigT
You may be doing things correctly, but just to make sure, you might want to scan this MacWorld article to make sure you're setting things up correctly and following the correct procedure when you connect from your other computer:
http://www.macworld.com/article/132002/2008/02/mobilemac2503.html
If you don't discover the problem once you've reviewed the procedure and settings, post back and I'm sure someone here will try to help further.
Regards.
Similar Messages
-
Updating SP of EP and users issue
Hi All,
I have EP SP9, and whats to update it to SP13. Can somebody tell me the procedure?
Also I need to configure SLD, but the J2EE_ADMIN does not have access to do it
http://abc:51000/sld
when logged in, give message like : No access to system: Contact System Administrator..
Any idea what roles to give to J2EE_ADMIN and from where and how? Also same while creating users in Identity management... ?Hi PD,
To upgrade your SP, checkout the below:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/a8/02784278b66255e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
For your "No Access", as mentioned above, make sure you have the Super Admin role, as you need it for authorisations to perform SLD and also user management. Super Admin is like "SAP_ALL" for the Portal. Encompasses all administration tools in the portal administration environment .
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/8e/f0f7415e639c39e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
If you are not able to do authorisation changes as an admin then help using the Emergency password recovery procedure, as explained below.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/3a/4a0640d7b28f5ce10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Hope that helps.
Ray -
Monitoring user issued queries...and how long queries have been running.
soalris 9
oracle 9i and 10gr2
I am trying to get the user issued query and how long it has bee running.
I was trying to test on test database running a query under scott schema with
1.5 million records which is almost taking more than 5 minutes and trying to
see If I can see the query and how long it has been running.
I ran script(show.sql---from Ask tom) got it from NET and i see session status as INACTIVE while query was still running. And I do not see the query in output.
I could see the show.sql query in output.
Why is it showing session status as INACTIVE when the sql is still running.
Could you please provide me sql that will show user issued quries and how ong they have been running
Message was edited by:
user539835
Message was edited by:
user539835Go to Morgan's Library at www.psoug.org and look up "DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO." This built in package has a procedure named SET_SESSION_LONGOPS that may help you.
-
MS14-022 and User Profile related issues
Hi all.
Since applying the patches in MS14-022 on Friday I've been having issues with certain aspects of two specific web applications.
Our intranet home page will not load and generates a large number of the following entries in the ULS log...
05/20/2014 07:53:36.54
w3wp.exe (0x146C)
0x1504
SharePoint Server
General
0
Medium
Constructed a new async cache named Profile Property Cache
0f15c23c-64b1-42bc-bdd8-f0a84cf358ba
05/20/2014 07:53:36.60
w3wp.exe (0x146C)
0x1504
SharePoint Portal Server
User Profiles
g11n
High
UserProfileApplicationProxy.InitializePropertyCache: System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: Object already exists. at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.MossClientBase`1.ExecuteOnChannel(String operationName,
CodeBlock codeBlock) at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ProfilePropertyServiceClient.ExecuteOnChannel(String operationName, CodeBlock codeBlock) at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ProfilePropertyServiceClient.GetProfileProperties()
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplicationProxy.RefreshProperties(Guid applicationID) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Utilities.SPAsyncCache`2.GetValueNow(K key) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Utilities.SPAsyncCache`2.GetValue(K
key, Boolean asynchronous) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Adminis...
0f15c23c-64b1-42bc-bdd8-f0a84cf358ba
05/20/2014 07:53:36.60*
w3wp.exe (0x146C)
0x1504
SharePoint Portal Server
User Profiles
g11n
High
...tration.UserProfileApplicationProxy.InitializePropertyCache()
0f15c23c-64b1-42bc-bdd8-f0a84cf358ba
05/20/2014 07:53:36.60
w3wp.exe (0x146C)
0x1504
SharePoint Portal Server
User Profiles
cm6y
High
User Profile Application Proxy failed to retrieve partitions from User Profile Application: Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.UserProfileApplicationNotAvailableException: No User Profile Application available to service the request. Contact your farm administrator.
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplicationProxy.get_ApplicationProperties() at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplicationProxy.get_PartitionIDs() at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplicationProxy.IsAvailable(SPServiceContext
serviceContext)
0f15c23c-64b1-42bc-bdd8-f0a84cf358ba
The same is logged when trying to view the PWA site of our Project Server 2010 web app.
All other web apps are responding as expected and, strangely enough, other pages and sites in the intranet and PWA Site Collections are fine too.
Has anyone any ideas as to why this problem exists and why only certain pages/sites are affected?
The User Profile Service is responding on all 4 servers in the farm and User Profile Sync's are running on time with no issues.
I've searched and found similar issues but there are no issues with our SharePoint Web Services site authentication settings which is proposed as a resolution in the following article even though our User Profile Services all seem fine...
http://blogs.technet.com/b/manjesh/archive/2011/02/06/sharepoint-2010-unable-to-start-the-user-profile-synchronization-service.aspx
Thanks in advance.Try below:
http://torydouglas.com/?p=88
http://blogs.technet.com/b/steve_chen/archive/2010/10/13/troubleshooting-user-profile-sync-issues-on-sharepoint-2010.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/library/gg750254%28v=office.14%29.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/library/gg750257%28v=office.14%29.aspx -
Users locked after several password errors - Event ID 4625, CHAP and other issues
The event log showing the user´s password error is shown here, partially:
An account failed to log on.
Account For Which Logon Failed:
Security ID:
NULL SID
Account Name: <USERNAME>
Account Domain: <USERDOMAIN>
Failure Information:
Failure Reason:
Unknown user name or bad password.
Status:
0xc000006d
Sub Status:
0xc000006a
Process Information:
Caller Process ID:0x388
Caller Process Name: C:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe
Network Information:
Workstation Name:
Source Network Address: -
Source Port:
Detailed Authentication Information:
Logon Process:
CHAP
The "CHAP" puzzles me, but after converting the 0X388, we have the PID 904:
tasklist /FI "PID eq 904" /svc
Image Name PID Services
========================= ======== ============================================
svchost.exe 904 AeLookupSvc, Appinfo, BITS, CertPropSvc,
EapHost, gpsvc, IAS, IKEEXT, iphlpsvc,
LanmanServer, ProfSvc, Schedule, seclogon,
SENS, SessionEnv, ShellHWDetection,
Winmgmt, wuauserv
Could RADIUS be be the responsible? Why RADIUS will send so many attempts to the AD/DCs?
We´re using 802.1X with NPS n the DCs and user have two devices in the same physical port of HP the Switch: the user´s computer AND a Alcatel IP Phone, authenticated by a DOmain
User (service account) using MD5
We do not trace much information right now, but some of the users that are complaining about that, have changed their password recently, therefore, for some reason, the old
password are being re-used?Hi Kay,
Since user passwords got changed recently, the account lockouts should be caused by stored expired credentials. Credentials can be stored within services, programs, scheduled tasks, scripts, RDP sessions or even mobile phones.
I suggest you try to locate the machine where bad password attempts are generated through event messages, or by using network monitor to capture real-time network traffic. After that, find the source which is sending the bad password, then clear stored credentials
on it.
If the source cannot be located, you may rename those problematic accounts to avoid subsequent lockouts.
More information for you:
Troubleshooting Account Lockout
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773155%28v=ws.10%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Troubleshooting account lockout the PSS way
http://blogs.technet.com/b/instan/archive/2009/09/01/troubleshooting-account-lockout-the-pss-way.aspx
Best Regards,
Amy
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected] -
Configuration issue in IE as Document mode: 10 and User agent String: Internet Explorer 8
Hi,
I have a telerik rad popup window performing some input operation. The problem is when I use the configuration in IE as Document mode: 10 and User
agent String: Internet Explorer 8, scroll bars appear in the window from nowhere. It is working fine with every other configuration of IE. I've also used a separate stylesheet for IE 8 but it won't apply in this case.
Here are the screen shots of the window.
Actual view
With Scorllbar
Please if anybody could suggest a solution for this weird problem it would be a great help.
Thanks in advance.
NeeleshHi,
It seems we need to talk with the site developers to determine how the sheet would display with different IE user agent string.
Regarding the user agent string changes, please take a check with the following article:
Introducing IE9’s User Agent String
The Internet Explorer 8 User-Agent String (Updated Edition)
Hope this may help
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support -
Someone is using iturnes with my credit card without my permission and I want my credit card number removed. I've been trying to get this matter resolved for months. I've lost all patients with this matter. I want my credit card number removed from your business.
Virginia Mezger
<Personal Information Edited by Host>Please be aware that you are not communicating with Apple when you post in these forums. The only people who will reply to your posts are we your fellow users.
Since you don't say what resources and methods you've been attempting to get this matter resolved, it's difficult to offer suggestions. But if your credit card has been used without your permission, your primary recourse should be to your credit card company to report the unauthorized charges and have them issue you a new credit card. If your card has been compromised such as to make unauthorized charges on the iTunes Store, it's highly probably that it can be used elsewhere.
As to removing the card number from your iTunes Store account, see:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1918
You should be able to change or remove the card information there. If not, go here:
iTunes Support
and follow the instructions to report the issue to the iTunes Store, if you have not done so already. If you have, please post back with a summary of what they told you and perhaps someone can offer additional suggestions as to how to proceed.
Regards.
Regards. -
HI,
We are getting following error message for all users while sending mail to external but we able to receive mail from internet.
Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept e-mail from certain senders, or another restriction may
be preventing delivery.Hi,
Please follow Luke and Shelly’s suggestion to check your SPF record and Send Connector configuration. Also you can post the complete NDR message(with NDR status code) here for further analysis.
If there is any updates, please feel free to let us know.
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support -
Firefox not honoring "Offline Web Content And User Data" settings
Firefox always accepts offline web content and user data, I never get any notification regardless of the "tell me when a website asks to store data for offline use" setting (found in Preferences > Advanced > network).
I also completely cleared the about:permissions tab. Regardless of the "All sites > Offline storage" setting, offline storage is always allowed.
Here is a step- by step guide to reproduce my issue.
1. Make sure about:permissions is clear
2. make sure the list at: preferences > Network > "The following websites are ...." is also clear
3. Close the preferences window
4. Go to go to http://appcachefacts.info/demo/ ... No notification regarding offline cache will be shown.
5. Open the preference window, the list at preferences > Network > "The following websites are ...."
Will now be populated with http://appcachefacts.info (1.1MB)
This list entry persists even after closing the browser window and re-opening it.
This happens with complete disregard to the settings described in the first paragraph.
I found a related issue, but it is old and archived:
https://support.mozilla.org/he/questions/981189Firefox will store small amounts (less than 50 MB) of data without asking for permission.
*offline-apps.allow_by_default;true
*offline-apps.quota.warn;51200
You can toggle the offline-apps.allow_by_default pref to false to make Firefox ask. -
I search the forum and find tons of info about people having trouble with permission and how to resolved. Can anyone share what is permission and ownership. I have use disk repair, but I don't know why it works as it relate to this topic.
AustinAt the risk of repeating what has already been offered:
What are permissions?
Every file and folder on a Mac OS X hard drive has a set of permissions—settings that determine which user(s) have access to each item, and exactly what that access is. For example, permissions dictate whether or not a particular user can open and edit a particular file. But permissions also determine which items the operating system—or specific parts of it—can access and modify, and which files are accessible by applications.
What does repairing permissions do?
The Repair Disk Permissions function—the process that actually performs the task of repairing permissions—examines certain files and folders on your Mac’s hard drive to see if their current permissions settings are what Mac OS X expects them to be; if discrepancies are found, the offending permissions are changed to match the expected settings.
(In Mac OS X 10.3 and later, repairing permissions also performs one other, unrelated, task: If the invisible /tmp symbolic link—which is linked to the /private/tmp directory—is missing, the link will be recreated.)
Why is it necessary to repair permissions?
If permissions on particular files are “incorrect”—i.e., not what Mac OS X expects them to be or not what they need to be for your Mac’s normal operation—you can experience problems when the operating system tries to access or modify those files. For example, you may have trouble logging in to your account, printing, launching applications, or even starting up your Mac. Similarly, if an application—from Apple or a third-party developer—needs access to a particular file or folder to function, and the permissions on that item have changed in a way that prevents such access, the application may not function properly (or at all). The Repair Disk Permissions function can fix such problems by ensuring that certain files have the correct permissions.
There’s also a security element here: Many system-level files have permissions set a particular way so that applications or users that shouldn’t be meddling with those files can’t. If the permissions on certain system-level files somehow get changed so that access to those files is no longer restricted, you’ve got the potential for a major security issue. Repairing permissions can resolve such issues by resetting permissions on those files to prevent unauthorized access.
How do I repair permissions?
The Repair Disk Permissions function is part of Apple’s Disk Utility (in /Applications/Utilities). After launching Disk Utility, select the desired disk—generally your startup disk—in the list to the left, then click the First Aid tab. At the bottom of the First Aid panel, click the Repair Disk Permissions button. (You could instead use the Verify Disk Permissions option to preview any potential repairs before performing them, but for most users there’s little benefit from this extra step.)
Permissions can also be repaired via the shell (Terminal) by using the command sudo diskutil repairPermissions /. However, it’s unlikely that the typical user will ever need to perform the task in this manner. It’s useful if for some reason Disk Utility itself won’t launch, or for repairing permissions on a remote Mac when connected via Remote Login (SSH), but otherwise you’re just as well served using Disk Utility.
How does the Repair Disk Permissions function know what the “correct” permissions are?
When you use Apple’s Installer utility to install software (such as Mac OS X itself or an OS X update), the installation package (the .pkg file you double-click to begin installation, or that Software Update downloads in the background for an automatic installation) generally leaves behind a receipt—a smaller Mac OS X package that includes information about every file installed, including the permissions each file should have. This receipt is placed in /Library/Receipts. When you run the Repair Disk Permissions function, it examines the receipts in the /Library/Receipts directory of the disk being repaired—which means the feature works only on volumes with Mac OS X installed—and compares the information in the receipt with the actual files on your drive. If the Repair Disk Permissions function finds a file with permissions that differ from what a receipt claims they should be, that file’s permissions are reset to their receipt-specified values. (If you’re curious about the information contained in a receipt, the easiest way to view it is to use the utility Pacifist; simply drag and drop the appropriate receipt into the Pacifist window and you’ll be presented with a list of all files installed by the similarly-named installation package, along with each file’s original permissions.)
It’s worth noting here that although the function is called “Repair Disk Permissions,” what is actually happening is that files’ permissions are being reset or restored to a particular state. It’s possible—though not common—for a particular file’s permissions to differ from what a receipt claims they should be without those permissions actually being “broken.”
Are all files affected by Repair Disk Permissions?
No. As you may have inferred from the above description, only those files installed using OS X’s Installer utility and whose installation packages leave behind a proper receipt in /Library/Receipts are affected by the Repair Disk Permissions function. This means that most of the files affected by the Repair Disk Permissions function are system-level files, application files, or system add-ons—not applications installed by drag-and-drop, and not your documents or other user-level files.
If repairing permissions is useful in general, why doesn’t Apple recommend it as routine maintenance?
Apple does, quite explicitly:
It’s a good idea to repair disk permissions as a regular maintenance task after upgrading or installing new software.
That’s taken from Mac Help—in both Panther and Tiger—right on your Mac. Similar statements can be found in other Support articles, one of which is:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25751 -
hi Guys
please help me out for below issue
Some time we are getting error while sending mail to particular recipient and getting below error
"Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept e-mail from certain senders, or another restriction may be preventing delivery.
The following organization rejected your message:"
but some mails are going without any issueHi,
First, please check if there is a transport rule blocking you from send email to the particular recipient. Besides, please check for any third party transport agents, I recommend you disable third party transport agents temporarily. If there is any AV/AS
scanning on your Exchange server, please disable it temporarily and test again.
If the issue persists, in order to troubleshoot the problem more efficiently, I need to clarify some information.
1. Did you send emails externally or internally?
2. How many recipients were affected?
3. From "Some time we are getting error while sending mail to particular recipient", do you mean all users couldn't send emails to the particular recipient or just some users of all couldn't send emails to the particular recipient?
Sometimes message tracking log is useful for us, to narrow down the issue, I recommend you check message tracking log for related error message.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support -
Failed Hardware Scan and other issues E440
Hi all,
This is probably more rant than anything, but I wanted to give a heads up to others too.
I have a ThinkPad E440 that is a year old. From the very first time I turned it on, there have been issues. The first hardware scan (via Lenovo Solution Center - LSC) showed a warning for the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 Local Connection Test. There were also tons of System Events that always show up in the "Configuration History" part of the LSC. You can look at the calendar and tell exactly which days I used the computer because there will be System Events generated each day. Things like app crashes and failed drivers.
In July 2014, I got the first warning for the 16 GB SSD - the SMART Short Self-Test. By February this year it showed as failed for each hardware scan (these were initially set up to run monthly).
Also the whole time I've had it the touch screen would just stop working at some point and I would have to reboot to get it working again.
I finally called Lenovo on March 30th, before my warranty expired. When I called that time, I didn't realize the hard drive failure was the SSD. So they sent me a new 500 GB drive. I also added the other things into the case when I talked to them. For the wireless issue they suggested making sure the driver was up to date. I did this and let them know when I called back that it was up to date and still having the warning. So I called them to tell them to tell them about the wireless and also that I realized it was the SSD having the failure, not the main drive. The first case had already been closed even though none of the other items were addressed.
So they opened another case (this is #2). They said to mail them the laptop since the wireless issue would probably be on the board and it wasn't something I could fix myself. They sent a box with a prepaid overnight shipping label. I was very sick for a few days so I sent it back to them on April 10th (a Friday). Via UPS I saw it was delivered on Saturday. Work was performed on it Monday, April 13th and sent back to me that very day. I received it on April 14th. This part of the service has been excellent - very fast response.
Being in IT, I included a letter with the laptop that outlined the issues that should have been in the case. I also printed the hardware scans and what the system events looked like.
When I got the laptop back, the sheet inside said they had replaced the Speaker because of Distorted Sound. This was not even on the list even though I had noticed it. I didn't even power up the laptop before calling them again - yes, I was furious! Plus our power was out...
So this was noon on the 14th. They opened case #3 and sent me ANOTHER BOX so I could send it back.
After our power came back on the 15th, I powered up my laptop. I opened the browser (I have it set to restore the previous session) and there was a sexually explicit video on YouTube. I opened the other browser and there was a different video on YouTube. So this person was watching YouTube instead of fixing my laptop. I looked through both browser histories and there was quite a bit of activity while my laptop was at the repair center... I ran the hardware scan - still failed and a warning for the wireless. They really hadn't done anything.
I also found two pictures of the repair person in the recycle bin...
So I called back. I was LIVID! They opened another case (this is #4). And sent me ANOTHER BOX. I finally learned the other day that once a case is opened, it cannot be edited or added to at all. Instead, they close the other case and open a new one. I guess their turnaround time for closing cases is excellent! I've never seen a system like that - and I've used a lot of them.
I got a really nice, patient fellow on the line. He took all my info (again). I emailed him the pictures, screen captures of the YouTube videos, the letter I had sent - everything. He entered as much into the new case as he could - he talked to one of the supervisors to make sure he did it right. Somehow he flagged it so that the laptop would get more attention (time) at the repair facility. He also opened a separate case (an escalation ticket?) for a supervisor to call me regarding the person's conduct at the repair facility. He said they would call me that day. (It's now the 25th and I've never heard from anyone)
So, he sent me ANOTHER BOX. I've built up quite a stack of them.
Our power was out AGAIN from the 17th through the 19th (don't get me started).
I noticed a hardware scan had now gotten a failure on the main hard drive. So I called them on the 21st to add this to the case before sending the laptop back. The girl said they can't add anything to an existing case or edit it at all once it's opened. She would have to open a new case and SEND ME ANOTHER BOX. I told her to forget it because I was ready to send it in and didn't want to wait for another box. I also asked for a status on that "escalation case" where the supervisor was supposed to call me. In order to do this she, yes, wait for it, had to open ANOTHER CASE!! So they would know I wanted a status. I'm completely dumbfounded.
So I sent it back on the 21st. This time I practically wiped it. I had already removed all my files the last time, but I had left my bookmarks and browser history intact. I set up a guest logon with admin privileges. I updated my letter and printed off more stuff to include with the box. On one sheet I had only the case number, the serial number and machine type. On another sheet I had "DO NOT SEPARATE THIS PAPERWORK FROM THE LAPTOP" and the case number. I put this sheet on top (The guy on the 15th said my letter and stuff may have gotten separated from the laptop once it was delivered to the repair facility). I used a ton of staples so it would all stay together. I included in my letter the failure on the main hard drive and asked if they could look at it. I wrote about having to open a new case if I wanted to include it.
They received it on the 22nd. A nice gentleman from the repair facility called me that day asking about the password. that. was. written. on the sheet they have you fill out. I told him what happened last time and also mentioned the hard drive failure and asked if he could look into it. He said they would.
I received my laptop back yesterday morning.The sheet that came with it said they had "replaced the following parts to complete the repair of your laptop."
Part Description Symptom
IMAGE Replaced due to engineering change
System board Network card error
Hard disk drive Network card error
ECA-WIRELESS <no symptom listed>
There was also a sheet saying they had installed a factory preload of software and I needed to install Lenovo and Windows updates.
When I booted it up, the first thing I noticed, in the lower right corner was:
Windows 8.1
SecureBoot isn’t configured correctly
Build 9600
I ran a hardware scan. Well, I tried. It stopped part way through and said it finished successfully but most of the tasks showed up as cancelled. I tried to run it again - issues - rebooting ensued. It said the LSC wasn’t available and that I should try again or reboot.
Tried several times. Then got what I guess is the new BSOD - kinder, gentler:
Your PC ran into a problem and needs to restart. We're just
collecting some error info, and then we'll restart for you. (xx% complete)
If you'd like to know more, you can search online later for this error: DRIVER_CORRUPTED_EXPOOL
Even though the LSC said my Lenovo files were all up to date, I ran the Update. And first I had to download a new version of Update. Then I downloaded all of the Lenovo updates and installed them (there were quite a few). The BIOS update failed. While I was doing the Lenovo downloads, I got a light blue screen but no text (I was out of the room so I'm not sure what happened). Did CTRL-ALT-DEL and it shows only IE and Task Manager as applications that are running. Could not “Switch to” IE. Hitting window key to go to start didn't do anything. So I had to restart.
By 3pm yesterday there were 34 system events in the configuration history.
I ran the hardware scan again after I updated the Lenovo files, and you guessed it! Failure on the SSD (SMART Short Self-Test) and warning on the wireless. Nothing had changed. Except hardware scan is acting different than it did before I sent in the laptop for repairs. When it finishes, it instantly closes and just shows 100% complete. When I click on "see last results" it shows a screen called
Log Information,
Canceled 04/24/2015 n:nn pm
You have not done a hardware test on your computer
And the calendar in LSC only shows the very first hardware scan I did on Friday. Even the hardware scan screen shows the date and time of the last scan. It also shows the error code. In order to see exactly what is failing, I have to sit there and watch it very closely and snap a picture of the screen as soon as the error (or warning) shows up.
When I would try to run Windows update, it would hang up PC Settings. I couldn't even kill it using task manager because it didn't show up as a task. During this, I got a flag saying the firewall wasn't turned on. I tried to turn it on, but clicking on Turn on Windows Firewall didn't do anything. I tried to setup my Microsoft account but that just hung too.
I ended up running Windows Update FOUR TIMES to get all the updates installed. Every time I ran it, it said "Done!" and I would run it again and more would show up. The last time was this morning.
At some point, the error about SecureBoot went away.
Then, I created a bootable BIOS update disk. Following the ReadMe instructions, I went through ThinkPad Setup and verified several values. Of note:
Secure Boot was DISABLED. According to the ReadMe file, this should be ENABLED in Windows 8.1. I enabled it.
Under Startup/Boot, according to the ReadMe that came with the BIOS update, UEFI/Legacy Boot is supposed to be set at UEFI Only for Windows 8.1. Mine was set to "Both". I changed it.
In Startup, OS Optimized Defaults was DISABLED, even though it says right there (and in the BIOS update ReadMe) it should be ENABLED to meet Microsoft Windows 8 Certification Requirement.
After these updates, I flashed the new BIOS.
Then, I ran hardware scan again...
Now I have TWO failures on the SSD: Random Seek Test and SMART Short Self-Test. Great.
In the Event Viewer (that I recently discovered), it says my disk has a bad block. It just says The device, \Device\Harddisk\DR1, has a bad block. I assume this is the SSD...
There are 867 events in the event viewer - Critical, Error, and Warning...
Fifty-two of these are from October 7, 2013 - before my little laptop was a glimmer.
The rest are from when Lenovo had it and yesterday and today.
64 of them are the disk error.
341 are from DeviceSetupManager. 65 of those are from failed driver installs. 69 are for not being able to establish a connection to the windows update service. 64 are from not being able to establish a connection to the Windows Metadata and Internet Services (WMIS).
3 times it's rebooted without cleanly shutting down
60 of them are from Service Control Manager and say The TDKLIB service failed to start due to the following error: The system cannot find the file specified.
One of them says {Registry Hive Recovered} Registry hive (file): '\??\C:\Users\Default\NTUSER.DAT' was corrupted and it has been recovered. Some data might have been lost.
16 are warnings that various processors in Group 0 are being limited by system firmware.
12 say the certificate for local system with thumbprint <bunch of hex numbers> is about to expire or already expired.
108 are warnings for failure to load the driver \Driver\WUDFRd for various devices
16 are application errors
One is for the computer rebooting from a "bug check"
15 are for name resolutions timing out after none of the configured DNS servers responded.
10 are for SecureBoot being disabled.
14 for services terminating unexpectedly
15 are for WLAN Extensibility Module has stopped
61 are for applications not being able to be restarted because the application SID does not match Conductor SID
12 are for activation of CLSID timing out waiting for the service wuauserv to stop
So, I'll call them on Monday and open. a. new. case (#5?) - but really 7. And get A NEW BOX.
I'll keep you updated!Hi amycdero and welcome to the HP Forum,
I understand that you are having scanning and printing issues after upgrading to Mavericks OS X v10.9.1. I will try my best to help you resolve this issue.
In this document for Mac OS X: Scanning Software Does Not Open or Stops Responding are steps the may help you with your scanning issue.
This document for Fixing Ink Streaks, Faded Prints, and Other Common Print Quality Problems should help with the streaking printing issue.
I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know.
Thank you,
I worked on behalf of HP. -
OS 10.4.10 Update Causing Audio Popping (AND HUM) Issues:
OS 10.4.10 Update Causing Audio Popping (AND HUM) Issues:
The problem on my Intel Mac mini with external Klipsch speakers (two mid-range/high and a subwoofer) is REAL obvious as the system emits a hum like a Spinal Tap amplifier turned up to #11 when 10.4.10 powers down the audio circuitry
Then, if I play a song in iTunes, it first pops and the hum disappears right before playing.
Quite annoying. I restored the mini from a recent backup to 10.4.9. Problem gone.
I'm glad I test updates on the mini before applying them to my Intel iMac 24. I guess I'll just hide & watch what happens before doing any more updates.
Here's what I sent to Apple tech support:
Guys/Gals (OS X Engineers):
Concerning the Snap, Crackle Pop Audio problem in the 10.4.10 update:
Please. Just do the right thing and fix the audio.
There is no need to power cycle the audio subsystem to save .0005 amps on the laptop line.
And then to make your Mac mini/iMac/other desktop users have to put up with it when using AC power is ridiculous.
Put the audio subsystem back like it was in 10.4.9 and let the laptop battery freaks looking for mini-amp savings get a "work-a-round".
Crikey!
iMac 2.16 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo 2GB RAM Mac OS X (10.4.9) 20 Years of Microsoft-Induced Grey Hair
Mac Mini 1.83 Ghz Intel Core Duo 1GB RAM Mac OS X (10.4.9) 20 Years of Microsoft-Induced Grey HairLibby,
Backup is unable to make a restorable by Disk Utility backup. You can restore pieces of the software as outlined in my FAQ about backing up user data:
http://www.macmaps.com/backup.html
But to be able to restore a backup with Disk Utility, you need a cloning utility to have made the backup.
I suggest starting a new thread here, where someone else could help you out better:
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=752&start=0
First off, you'll get a wider audience who may be able to solve your problem. Secondly, responses to you won't confuse the original poster with solutions that don't apply to them. And thirdly, you'll know for certain whether or not a response applies to you. -
URGENT - HELP NEEDED WITH ECC 6.0 ACCESS KEY and USER SETUP
Please help me with the two issues:
1) In ECC 6.0, When I go to SE12 , table V-FAGL_ACTIVEC (New GL Activation) to make the table display and maintenance allowed, I am asked for the access key. What is the access key that I am supposed to put here. When I go to DEVACCESS table and put my username, I still dont get the access key.
2) Also I need to know what should be maintained under SU01 to give a user all authorizations. I have SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW. Is there anyother profile need to be given here. Also do I need to give anything under roles tab in order for the user to have all accesses??OK I have TAR for this:
TAR 4234076.996
and related issue discussed in regards to 500 Internal Server Error described on Neverending frustration with JDeveloper
with the TAR number
TAR 4332393.995
The latter has been demonstrated and confirmed to be a BUG at this point. For the future updates on this issue please refer to
Neverending frustration with JDeveloper -
Apache 2 and ~User Site folder
I recently installed Apache 2 following the helpful guide at http://www.phpmac.com/articles.php?view=244, at any rate while I have Apache running correctly, and can load http://127.0.0.1 (which displays the Apple default stuff) I cannot load http://127.0.0.1/~username. I have followed the guide, editing the httpd-userdir.conf, so I am not sure what to do. Having looked at an old Apache httpd.conf file I noticed that it had a
<IfModule mod_userdir.c>
UserDir Sites
</IfModule>
statement which is missing from the new httpd.conf, might that be the source of the problem? For example, there may be a module that I failed to install? If so a little direction would be a big help -- I don't know much about adding modules beyond "LoadModule". Any help is much appreciated!>Would you please take a look at my thread 9-22-06
Not unless you post a link to it.
In any case I know exactly what I'll say there.
The first is to ask what the logs say. I'll go out on a limb and say there's an error message that looks something like:
Permission denied: access to /Users/billjones/Sites/index.php failed because search permissions are missing on a component of the path.
Am I right?
If so the log message tells you what's wrong - Apache doesn't have permissions to search the directory tree to get to the document, so it doesn't know if the document exists, or whether it can serve it.
You need to add world-executable privileges to every directory in the path to the file - that means /Users, /Users/billjones and /Users/billjones/Sites
Since your other 'guest1' account works it's likely that /Users has the right permissions, so focus on the other directories.
You'll need to chmod a+x /Users/billjones in order to set the execute bit on your home directory. Then repeat it with the /Users/billjones/Sites directory.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I migrate (change) my apps from one account to another?
how do I move apps to an account of Argentina for an account in Uruguay?
-
How can I sync my iPhone 4s with ipad2 via iCloud ?
I am using the same apple I'd for my iPhone4 and ipad2 and I have ON all the settings which I need to sync. How can I sync my iPhone 4s with ipad2 via iCloud ?
-
Analog Triggering and Interrupt generation on the PCIe-6320 under Linux
We would like to use the analog triggering functions of the PCIe-6320 under Linux to time tag external events. I have no experience with the MH DDK but have been told this is what we would need to implement the functions we want. We plan on using Fed
-
[JS][ScriptUI] InDesign loses focus
Hi, may someone help me with my "focusing" problem? When I make a ScriptUI dialog and set a Window element (i.e. EditText) property to active, InDesign (application) loses its top-level hierarchy in MS Windows after "OK" or "Cancel". It can be demons
-
I can't use my back and forward cursor, how do I make them work?
My forward and back cursors are not enabled. == This happened == Just once or twice == My firefox shut down