Permit Classification Problem

Dear All
While creating classification in IPMD for a permit; the system gives a dump.
Shown to ABAP progemammer but still no solution has been found.
Is there any problem in assigning the values to the class or characteristics for the IPMD classification.
Regards
Praveen Dhankar

Hi all
Please find the dump in here as follows:
Transaction Code: IPMD
Select a line item
When I go into change mode and click on the detail; it displays a screen.
Now when I click on Classification it gives me a dump.
Runtime Errors         ASSIGN_LENGTH_0
Date and Time          06.05.2009 10:02:52
Short text
Program error: ASSIGN with length 0 in program "SAPLCLCV".
What happened?
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "SAPLCLCV" had to be terminated because it has come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.  Tried to create a field with length 0. This is not possible.
Error analysis
In an ASSIGN statement in the program "SAPLCLCV" a field symbol with length 0 should have been created. However, this is not possible length 0. This is not possible.
Trigger Location of Runtime Error
     Program                                 SAPLCLCV
     Include                                 LCLCVU03
     Row                                     49
     Module type                             (FUNCTION)
     Module Name                             CLCV_CONV_EXIT
Source Code Extract
Line  SourceCde
   19     SMASK(7)                 TYPE C VALUE '==$',
   20     CFELD                    LIKE RMCLF-OBJEK,
   21 *------- the object that has to to be classified will be build up in
   22 *------- field XFELD appropriate definition of TCLO
   23     XFELD(100)               TYPE C,
   24     L_STRING_LENGTH          TYPE I,
   25     L_FIELD_LENGTH           TYPE I,
   26     L_KEYFIELD               TYPE TCLO-KEYF0,
   27     L_RETCODE                TYPE SY-SUBRC,
   28
   29     BEGIN OF FIELD_ATTR.
   30       INCLUDE STRUCTURE DFIES. DATA:
   31     END   OF FIELD_ATTR.
   32
   33   FIELD-SYMBOLS:
   34     <OBJEKT>,
   35     <FELD>.
   36
   37   CLEAR OFFSET.
   38
   39 * read TCLO to work area and set CONVTAB                       v 1235023
   40 * corresponding to processed object type
   41   perform SET_CONVTAB using TABLE.                            "^ 1235023
   42
   43 *------- assign given string to work field
   44   ASSIGN EX_OBJECT TO <OBJEKT>.
   45
   46   LOOP AT CONVTAB.
   47 *------- reduce given string to its componets via given information
   48 *------- of contab
>>>>>     ASSIGN <OBJEKT>(CONVTAB-LEN) TO <FELD>.
   50
   51     IF CONVTAB-CON IS INITIAL.
52       WRITE <FELD> TO CFELD.
53     ELSE.
54 *------- a specific conversion rule is involved
55       REPLACE '$' WITH CONVTAB-CON INTO MASK.
56       condense mask no-gaps.                                "UP_H578730
57 *------- prepare field with given conversion rule
58       WRITE <FELD> TO CFELD USING EDIT MASK MASK.
59       MASK = SMASK.
60     ENDIF.
61
62     WRITE CFELD TO XFELD+OFFSET(CONVTAB-OUTL).
63     OFFSET = OFFSET + CONVTAB-OUTL.
64     WRITE SPACE TO XFELD+OFFSET(1).
65     OFFSET = OFFSET + 1.
66 *    shift_value = convtab-outl.
67     shift_value = convtab-len.
68     help_field = <objekt>.

Similar Messages

  • OS 10.7.5 W' permissions repair problems. How to fix it?

    I have a 27" iMac running os 10.7.5 and i'm having permissions repair problems ever since my last os update,does anyone know whats going on and how to fix it? Any help or ideas would be appreciated.

    Something doesn’t sound right.  The messages shouldn’t be ignored if you restart the Disk Utility app and the same permission errors show up.  I’ve even rebooted the OS and found the same errors.  I also mistrust the file check function (vs Drive Genius reports).  
    None of this ever happened until the last patch 10.7.5 (11G63).

  • Repair Disk Permissions - Safari problem not going away

    Please help i seem to have come across a problem where when i repair disk permission i keep getting this message
    Permissions differ on “Applications/Safari.app/Contents/Resources/Safari.help/Contents/Resources/inde x.html”; should be lrwxr-xr-x ; they are -rwxr-xr-x .
    After I repair the problem just comes back. Im sure something isnt right please help

    I also see this issue.
    But in my case, repairing permissions on getting a nasty glitch [lots of character "u" appearing, on a Macbook]u
    Should indeed be unrelated, but have been finding that permissions repair temporarily fixes issue - and this is only consistent permission error reported
    Yes, I should take this machine in for checking/repair, but I mention here in case the problem is somehow linked to an issue that can occur on a few Macs...

  • CCC/Permissions/Admin problem, Please help

    I am attempting to clone Volume Alpha Tiger, which is stored on an external drive, onto Volume Beta 250, which resides on a G4 Power PC. I am managing this exchange with CCC via an Intel iMac linked by Ethernet and File sharing. Volume Beta already has a system on it which I want CCC to replace and archive old files.
    The problem is, after running CCC I am told I cannot proceed until:
    The account that you used to mount the destination volume does not have sufficient privileges to create or modify this item. Modify the permissions of this item or its parent folder on the destination computer or exclude it from this backup task to eliminate the error message. Alternatively, you can try backing up to a different folder on this volume, or back up to a disk image on this volume instead.
    I have gone to Beta 250, opened permissions (Command I), which tells me the System is the Owner. I figured that CCC wants the owner changed to my admin name. I unlock the volume, put in my account serial, unlock confirmed. Then I change Owner to my account name, put in my account serial. This results in a loop with a window telling me I do not have permission to change certain items on the volume. Back to square one.
    Assuming I have understood the message correctly, how do I get the priviliges/permissions correct to get CCC to do its work?
    Am I to understand that individual folders on the Beta 250 require permissions changed?
    Would I be better off giving Unix instructions via Terminal? If so how should they be expressed?

    Thank you for your consideration and your thoughts.
    Had I an alternative such as you describe I would have employed it. I have no experience of TDM and after reading a little about it it seems I have to involve myself with more hardware/software and another learning curve. If I can understand the Permissions and Priviliges issue that CCC identifies, I can replace the whole OS from the back-up disk. I will be able to use the computer normally and if the Apple install disk continues to fail it will confirm the hardware issue and I can act accordingly. I have a complete mirror of the OS on an external drive and it should have been a simple process to transfer the back-up onto the G4 using CCC. But CCC has minor issues which I seek to resolve.
    My experiments suggest there is probably a hardware problem which so far eludes me. I have removed and re-seated every card, relocated Ram and HDD connections as explained in my earlier post. Although my HDD is repeatedly verified as OK by different utilities, I nevertheless intend trying a drive swap to be certain. I have even started up with mouse and keyboard disconnected in case a faulty USB might be the source of hardware problems. All to no avail.
    Loading a Leopard install disc results in it loading then freezing, failing to complete the loading process. Loading a Tiger install disk results in a kernal panic. Both discs are supplied by Apple and are not machine specific.
    Since writing this post I have succeeded in booting up the computer normally on repeated occassions, but still cannot use install disks. My last CCC attempt clearly improved the OS even thought there are issues, according to CCC with certain files. Hence my querie regarding Permissions and Priviliges.
    That is the subject which would help me most at this stage.

  • Time Machine Permissions Changed Problem

    Greetings-
    I'm experiencing problems restoring to built-from-scratch Lion OS installation on a new disk.  Before starting the process I ensured everything was backed-up everything using Time Machine, which was backing-up regularly, then did a fresh install on a new disk drive in my machine.  I began restoring files (not users) from Time Machine, which began okay, but when I went to restore some folders that were under Pictures on the orginal disk, I got the failure error message that I've seen posted about not having permission to write those files back to my new disk.  I've used the same username and also checked that my UID was as before (501).
    I read a few posting, and tried to change the permissions on the Time Machine external backup disk to my current user, and after modifying that backup disk, I discovered that my Time Machine backups only go back in time to when I changed the disk permissions!    So now even if I look down through the Time Machine volume directory structure, the orginal folders are missing.  Time machine made at least one backup, but now I need advice and trying to recover those old directories and backups.
    Any advice is appreciated.  I've tried some recovery software, but loosing the old structure makes life fairly difficult and heartbreaking.  Thanks!

    Two weeks after upgrading my system to Lion and transferring to a new hard drive -- I could find the files I wanted to restore from the day before on my external-drive Time Machine but couldn't restore because I didn't have "access to the GlobalNav.lbi." 
    I did not solve the problem, but while trying various things with Apple tech I stumbled onto the fact that I could access the Time Machine from my partition, on which I have 10.6.8.
    Tech was at a loss because my 10.7 Recovery Drive is missing.  I'm making a Lion install USB stick (from MacWorld article instructions) and will try to reinstall the system and Recovery Drive.  I believe my Recovery Drive was damaged before moving my system to the new hard drive, perhaps by the hard drive that is being replaced by the manufacturer.

  • Archive, Repair Disk Permissions, etc. problems

    I have problems trying to archive files/folders. I get an error message: "The archive's list of contents cannot be created." I tried repairing disk permissions and it would still have that error message.
    Later, I decided to try to use Onyx, however, I couldn't access it and suggested to repair disk permissions and restart Onyx. I did that it still have that message. I later tried in another account, then in Safe Boot in my primary account and nothing changed. I can't even uninstall Onyx unless I repair disk permissions.
    I seemed to have problems syncing my iPod Touch 2g with iTunes saying that it couldn't sync because there was another sync client. I'm not sure if this is also related.
    It seems like that there is a system wide problem.

    I did stumble over that same thread and attempted to follow it. Something didn't work. I wasn't sure where '/tmp' was and using Terminal to perform the operations somehow didn't solve it. After revisiting the thread you posted, I figured out what was tmp which was located on the Macintosh HD -there was /tmp. Then I followed the steps and voilà, the archive did work. Along with Onyx and everything else.
    thanks!

  • Classification problem

    Hi experts,
    I have a problem working with a query-based taxonomy.  I will tell you step-by-step what I did so maybe it will make it easier for you to diagnose my problem (ie. if I missed a step)
    I have configurated a web repository (called test_repository) and an index that uses the repository as a datasource.  The web repository contains two websites, which are actually the english and french versions of a website (ie. they share the same HTTP system, but the system paths of each website differs, one is /en and the other is /fr).
    I then created a query-based taxonomy (called test_taxonomy), and created the categories 'en' and 'fr'.  Within these categories I created other subcategories.  I then used the Taxonomy Query Builder to define the content of the categories and the subcategories.  Since I am categorizing a web repository, my queries are all URL character strings. 
    For example:
    For test_taxonomy-->en, I set the query to
    property= 'Folder'
    value = /test_repository/website_en/*
    and for the subcategories within 'en', I set the query to
    property= 'Folder'
    value = /test_repository/website_en/cat<n>/*
    (n = 1...10)
    And I used similar setup for the category 'fr' and its subcategories.
    There are around 900 documents in the repository.  Now, after I saved and clicked 'update'.  There are only a very few documents (ie. 5%) that appear in the appropiate subcategories, the rest would remain in the first level categories of 'en' or 'fr' even though their URL indicate that they should belong in one of the subcategories (ie. the document with URL starting with www.mywebsite.com/en/cat1).  Still other documents failed to get classified (even though their URL starts with www.mywebsite.com/en for example), and they remain in the 'To be Classified' folder of the taxonomy (and yes, I have configurated 'auto-classification' in the index).
    What could be wrong?  I think I have done everything correctly.... The yield of the queries shouldn't be that low!?
    Thanks for your patience.  Urgent problem, points will be generously awarded
    Charles

    hmm.. I can't seem to classify web repository datasource with the 'Folder Id' query, the system will inform me that the resources do not exist (because it's web based and the repository is not hierarchical?).
    Also, I read in the documentations:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6b/36527995b3cc43bf47d7451608b0be/frameset.htm
    that 'In the case of Web repositories, the path has to contain an asterisk (*) as a placeholder. The asterisk prevents the system from checking the existence of a folder in the repository.'
    So in the end, I used *, but by following a suggestion from another thread,
    I use it in the pattern: *ABC instead.  In this case, I will get all resources that begin with the URL http://www.example.com/XYZ/ABC/...
    However, the yield is still unsatisfactory, for a considerable amount of the resources still didn't get auto-classified
    Thanks

  • Batch classification problem

    Dear Gurus,
    I have a stock of a material 100MT,with batch number a .i am using batch charcteristic values as b and c with classification for batch a.i am doing PGI for 10 MT.In MB51 if i am seeing the material doccument.I am seeing the despatched qty 10,with batch number a and charcteristic value b and c.No problem till now.
    As per my scenario,Now I am doing MSC2N with batch a, and i am changing the charcterictics values as b1 and c1.
    Now if i am checking material doccument for the previous one (601),in classification i am seeing b1 and c1,but as per my requirement we should see batch charcterisctic values asly b and c for 601 which i have done previously because while despatch it was b and c only.
    What I have to do from my end.Please help me where i have to do configuration.
    Guna

    Hi Guna,
    I think that in the material document the system records only the batch number, e.g. A in your case.
    When you display the characteristcs it is taking it from the batch record; so if you changed the values of the characteristics sfter the movement, you'll see the new values (as you do). System does not capture and freeze the classification of the batch in the material document.
    Regards,
    Mario

  • Permit classification for WBS element (for PM order)

    Hi!
    I've set up an automatic permit based on classification and it is working already correctly (for the field CSEVPERMIT-ILART).
    I would like to set up an another automatic permit, but for the WBS element (CSEVPERMIT-PSPEL). However this field is a numberic(8) field, so it allows only numbers (like 12345678), which is the ID of the WBS element in the database (which is the PRPS-PSPNR).
    But I have to set up the automatical permit based on the "useful" ID of the WBS element (PRPS-POSID).
    I have to set it up with the following mask: L++++++T* (if the WBS element matches the mask, then the permit have to appear in the order's permit list).
    Is there a way to achive this?
    Thank you
    Tamá

    Tamás,
      I dont think you will be able to achieve this through standard config. As indicated , you cannot use POSID field since its not part of the structure CSEVPERMIT. You will definetly have to use the existing field PSPEL.
       If you are in ECC 6.0, you could use the implicit enhancement functionality to enhance the existing flow to provide your own custom logic within FM PERMIT_PROPOSAL_BY_CLASS. You will also have to store the Mask to check in a  different location , since PSPEL is a numeric field.
      Also  beaware that unless you are modifying your existing class to add the WBS element field also, you will not be able to assign two different permit classes to permits.
    Regards
    Narasimhan

  • Repair permissions found problem?

    I routinely repaired permissions before using SWupdate to update my newly installed Panther on the MBP and got messages that certain SUID files had been modified and would not be repaired. They included "usr/libexec/load_hdi" and "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/DiskManagement.framework/Versions/A/Resources /DiskManagementTool" among others. Do I have a problem? Disk verify showed no problems.
    Don

    I hope you meant Leopard, not Panther because Panther does not run on Intel Macs! As for your question, it's answered here.

  • Repair disk permissions shows problem

    trying to get a printer installed I ran repair disk permissions and came up with a problem.
    Question, how do I resolve it?
    message is: System/Library/CoreS cannot be repaired.
    I need advise from someone a lot smarter than me.
    I have not noted any problems with any component or aspect of the os other than this one Epson printer which will not install.
    Not sure if re-install of SL would correct problem or cause changes to current setup.

    no, this is not the full message. it's still truncated. there is no such thing as "System/Library/CoreS". there is a directory "System/Library/CoreServices" which contains a lot of stuff. the message likely refers to something in that directory. but as I said, all such SUID messages are harmless and should be ignored.

  • Permissions / Sharing - Problem with USB Drives

    Hi,
    I suspect it's possible to do what I want, but not via the "easy" route. I'm very new to OS X, so hoping there's some more advanced functionality I haven't found yet.
    This is what I want to do:
    I have a USB drive connected to a Mac Mini running Snow Leopard. I have two users setup - one admin, one normal. I want only the local admin account to be able to access the files on the USB drive. I want the admin account to share the contents via the local network with my (Vista) laptop (which is setup with the same username / password as the admin account).
    Problem I have is that whenever I try to apply any permissions to the USB drive, they are ignored. From what I've found on the internet, that is "by design" behaviour.
    Are there any ways around this that people can suggest? Scripts? Other utilities? Other settings hidden away somewhere?
    Beyond that, ideally I'd like to encrypt the whole drive as a TrueCrypt partition, mount the drive automatically when the laptop is detected (using a keyfile stored on the laptop), and then only let the laptop access the drive. But I'll accept a simple solution for now!
    Thanks,
    David

    select the external drive in finder and enter command+i. in the resulting popup unlock the lock and uncheck the box to ignore ownership on this drive. permissions won't be ignored now. give your admin user read+write permissions to the drive and remove them from everybody else. that should do it.
    I don't use TrueCrypt and can't comment on that.

  • Installing Applications - Permissions Question/Problem

    Hi All:
    I have tried a number of searches and found variations on this, but was wondering why permissions get modified when I perform drag and drop installations of applications.
    When I use an installer to install applications such as iWork, iLife, Office, and Creative Suite, and so on the permissions are always listed as system then admin then everyone, with system and admin being read/write and everyone being read only. In this situation, everything works perfectly. However, when I drag and drop to install applications such as Bento, most shareware, the permissions are listed as my user, then staff or admin, then everyone. Sometimes the staff and admin are listed read only and then the icon does not show up until I manually change this to read/write.
    I have also noticed another problem when I am running in my limited access (none admin) mode: When I tried to install a NEW drag and drop application it would ask for a username and password and then install as described in the previous paragraph, but when I tried to install an UPGRADE to an application I had, it would ask me to authenticate. When I clicked authenticate it would go straight to the replace dialog and then when I click replace button it would fail. In the process of failing it would damage the application that was already installed. As a result I would then need to manually remove the damaged application and drop the upgrade back in to the folder, at which it would correctly ask for the username and password.
    Something is wrong here. As a none admin user I should not be able to damage applications when prevented from installing them.
    I've tried the usual permission fixes, but there must be something that is not quite right. I have even tried a reinstall.
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    Message was edited by: Paul Charlesworth
    Message was edited by: Paul Charlesworth

    Paul Charlesworth wrote:
    Hi All:
    I have tried a number of searches and found variations on this, but was wondering why permissions get modified when I perform drag and drop installations of applications.
    When I use an installer to install applications such as iWork, iLife, Office, and Creative Suite, and so on the permissions are always listed as system then admin then everyone, with system and admin being read/write and everyone being read only. In this situation, everything works perfectly. However, when I drag and drop to install applications such as Bento, most shareware, the permissions are listed as my user, then staff or admin, then everyone. Sometimes the staff and admin are listed read only and then the icon does not show up until I manually change this to read/write.
    this is normal and what you describe is exactly how it should work. when an app uses an installer it runs as root and the installer manages permissions on files it creates. they are always owned by root (=system in Finder GUI). when you install something by drag and drop then the application is owned by you and the group listed is your primary group which is staff.
    I have also noticed another problem when I am running in my limited access (none admin) mode: When I tried to install a NEW drag and drop application it would ask for a username and password and then install as described in the previous paragraph, but when I tried to install an UPGRADE to an application I had, it would ask me to authenticate. When I clicked authenticate it would go straight to the replace dialog and then when I click replace button it would fail. In the process of failing it would damage the application that was already installed. As a result I would then need to manually remove the damaged application and drop the upgrade back in to the folder, at which it would correctly ask for the username and password.
    Something is wrong here. As a none admin user I should not be able to damage applications when prevented from installing them.
    I don't know what exactly happened here but I'm guessing you tried to upgrade an application that was installed by a different user originally. that might create permissions problems. but since all such apps are installed by drag and drop you can always trash the old app and install the updated one by drag and drop. that will always work (you'll have to authenticate of course).
    I've tried the usual permission fixes, but there must be something that is not quite right.
    repair permissions will not touch any 3rd party apps or files so it will have zero effect on this issue.
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    Message was edited by: Paul Charlesworth
    Message was edited by: Paul Charlesworth
    Message was edited by: V.K.

  • Permissions Repair Problem

    Hi all, my friend just installed a copy of leopard on his macbook pro about two days back. After about two days of regular usage, (bear in mind, he is a new user) I informed him of the importance of periodically repairing permissions on his drive. Both while booting of the DVD, and while running the OS as normal.
    Anyhow, after selecting "Repair Permissions" on the selected volume on which it Leopard is installed, we received the following errors/results:
    *+Repairing permissions for “Macintosh HD”+*
    *+Warning: SUID file "usr/libexec/load_hdi" has been modified and will not be repaired.+*
    *+Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/DiskManagement.framework/Versions/A/Resources /DiskManagementTool" has been modified and will not be repaired.+*
    *+Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/DesktopServicesPriv.framework/Versions/A/Reso urces/Locum" has been modified and will not be repaired.+*
    *+Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Install.framework/Versions/A/Resources/runner " has been modified and will not be repaired.+*
    *+Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Admin.framework/Versions/A/Resources/readconf ig" has been modified and will not be repaired.+*
    *+Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Admin.framework/Versions/A/Resources/writecon fig" has been modified and will not be repaired.+*
    *+Warning: SUID file "usr/libexec/authopen" has been modified and will not be repaired.+*
    *+Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/Finder.app/Contents/Resources/OwnerGroupTool" has been modified and will not be repaired.+*
    *+Permissions repair complete+*
    No I'm no expert, but this does not look like something normal or good. After this, we clicked the Verify tab to verify the disk and the following result was reported:
    *+Verifying volume “Macintosh HD”+*
    *+Performing live verification.+*
    *+Checking Journaled HFS Plus volume.+*
    *+Checking Extents Overflow file.+*
    *+Checking Catalog file.+*
    *+Checking multi-linked files.+*
    *+Checking Catalog hierarchy.+*
    *+Checking Extended Attributes file.+*
    *+Incorrect number of Extended Attributes+*
    *+(It should be 1213 instead of 1214)+*
    *+Checking volume bitmap.+*
    *+Checking volume information.+*
    *+The volume Macintosh HD needs to be repaired.+*
    *+Error: Filesystem verify or repair failed.+*
    Clearly, something has gone wrong and we have no clue why, unless this is a routine experience(which I seem to doubt).
    Anyhow, can anyone tell me:
    1. What does it mean?
    2. What's the problem and is it serious?
    3. How can I fix it?
    I graciously welcome the input of any wise member of this community as I am totally perplexed--particularly, because everything seems to be running just perfectly.
    Thanks Again.

    Some people have reported that this happened when using Software Update to install the 10.5.1 update and that downloading the standalone 10.5.1 update from the Downloads above and reinstalling that fixes most of those messages. There will still remain one in reference to the Remote Desktop Agent, but again it's harmless.

  • Repair disk permissions details/problems

    a while back when i used to do this, it would show up blank with no problems, everything would be fine and it would say repair disk permissions complete, fairly quickly aswel
    now it take a long time and shows me a big list of problems, which i dont really understand, anyways to resolve this or is a single thing causing this, im sure this is not normal
    heres some screenshots
    [IMG]http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k170/tuffrida/OSX/Picture1.png[/IMG]
    [IMG]http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k170/tuffrida/OSX/Picture2.png[/IMG]
    [IMG]http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k170/tuffrida/OSX/Picture3.png[/IMG]
    [IMG]http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k170/tuffrida/OSX/Picture4.png[/IMG]
    [IMG]http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k170/tuffrida/OSX/Picture5.png[/IMG]
    [IMG]http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k170/tuffrida/OSX/Picture6.png[/IMG]
    [IMG]http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k170/tuffrida/OSX/Picture7.png[/IMG]
    [IMG]http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k170/tuffrida/OSX/Picture8.png[/IMG]
    thanks...

    none of these messages indicate a problem. all but the last few refer to ACLs on the user template folder. I've seen similar messages (although not that many) on some of my machines and I checked out a few ACLs to see what they were. all of them were some ACLs giving various rights to the system to the items in the User template folder. I don't know why the system create those ACLs but they affect nothing. user template folder is only consulted when a new user is created on your computer. then the system copies the template home directory to the new user home directory. It has no other affect on the functionality of the system and doesn't affect anything else.
    you might want to rerun 10.5.5 combo update which might make those messages go away but it's not really needed.

Maybe you are looking for