Photoshop Bug export jpg

Bonjour, j'utilise photoshop CC 2014 sous windows 8.1. Au moment d'enregistrer un fichier au format jpg le programme plante et ne répond plus. Que faire ?

Please read these and proceed accordingly (restoring Preferences after making sure all customized presets like Actions, Patterns, Brushes etc. have been saved might be of special interest):
http://blogs.adobe.com/crawlspace/2012/07/photoshop-basic-troubleshooting-steps-to-fix-mos t-issues.html
http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-2325

Similar Messages

Aperture 3.6 not exporting jpg versions at 300dpi despite preset selected

Hi, Aperture 3.6 is not exporting jpg versions (of Nikon RAW) files at 300dpi despite 300dpi being selected in the preset.
Jpgs are being exported at 72dpi although Tiffs are being exported correctly.
I'm guessing it's a recurrence of the previous Aperture bug but while we wait for a fix, does anyone have a solution please?
I'm currently exporting Tiffs and then using a Photoshop batch action to save as jpgs - not a great workflow!
TIA
Steve
PS: Aperture 3.6, Yosemite 10.10.1, 27" iMac, 32Mb RAM

See Problem with Aperture 3.6 preset exports

Why won't Aperture exported jpgs open in Lion?

A while ago I exported my most important projects from Aperture 1.5.6 into a folder that subsequently would contain folders for each project. Names of the exported jpgs within each such folder, are in the format "2005-02-03 19-46-29.jpg". They all differ in file size and opening them in BBEdit shows that they are not all zeros. All in all, there is about 14GB of jpgs that were exported this way. None of the jpgs will now open and I am at a loss as how to repair all of these files. The error that Graphic Converter returns is: "-003:'Forbidden' prefix found in file 2005-02-03 19-46-29.jpg ..."
Here are my current system specs:
iMac 2009, 2,8GHz core i7, 12GB RAM, running 10.7.5 (11G63)
The files now reside on an external FW disk.
What I have already tried (with no luck) is:
- repair permissions
- opening in Photoshop
- stripping EXIF (and other) metadata from jpgs using Graphic Converter 6.7
- changing file names and extensions
- trying to open them on another system
- trying to import into Aperture 3
- checked disk health with Disk Utility (all disks are ok)
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Tobias
Stockholm

If you Web search for something like 'repair jpg mac' you'll get a number of hits for both articles discussing the problem and for software (both free and commercial).
I've never had to try and do this so I can't comment on what might work but its a place to start.
good luck

My exported JPGs are not recognized by Preview or Microsoft applications

Just converted from Photoshop to Lightroom on my Mac (O/S 10.7.5). I love the flexibility and speed but my exported JPGs are not recognized by Preview or any Microsoft application (Word, PowerPoint, etc). The only applications that will open them are LR or PS. I am exporting them from LR as JPGs.
What am I doing wrong?
Help Please

That's very odd. Could you attach a screen shot of your Export dialogue? Make sure it includes File Settings and Image Sizing:
You can use the "camera" icon (in the Forum's Reply tool bar) to attach the screen shot.
Also, it would be helpful to place one of the ill-behaved, exported JPEGs in a service like DropBox and post a link to it, so we can take a close look at it.
Hal

Magenta colour cast added to exported jpg photos

I shoot raw with my Canon EOS 5D and import the raw images to LR. There is no Development preset. Colours in LR look OK on my calibrated monitor - this is not a camera calibration problem as suggested in LR help and knowledgebase; I have tested these solutions with no change. Basic edits are usually about exposure correction or spot removal.
When I export the photos as a jpg files they have a magenta colour cast, sometimes quite strong. LR cannot be used for reliable prediction of what an exported photo will look like.
I checked with Canon Digital Photo Professional. The colour of the original photo shown in DPP is exactly the same as the jpg colours. This makes me think that LR display render is unreliable.
My system is as follows
LR 1.4.1 on PC with XP Pro service pack 2
LR installed on C: with over 80GB free space
LR catalogue on second internal F: with over 34GB free space
Photos on USB drive with over 220GB free space
2GB RAM 2.4 GHz P4 with Dell 2408WFP LCD monitor
LR export to sRGB 80% jpg 1000 pixels short edge (reduced from 4368x2912 pixel)

>I calibrate my monitor with Monaco EZcolor 2.6.5 and an i1 calorimeter from x-rite. I have profiles for day time with natural light and for evening with artificial light. I have also tested the monitor with various pictures for black and for colour rendering.
Excellent! Be aware that I have seen problems on this forum before because of defective colorimeters (a calorimeter is a device that measures heat BTW!).
>I use LR and Photoshop CS2. I use Canon software to download the photos from my camera to sub folder of my own choice then I import them to LR. The colour rendition by LR and Photoshop are identical.
That is a very good sign. If the color rendition between Lightroom and Photoshop is identical, you do not have a bad monitor profile, so we have to think about something else.
>The exported jpg files are uploaded onto a web page at panoramio.com for use on Google Earth. Therefore I view the jpg files with Mozila Firefox 2.0.0.14 and with Google Earth 4.2 The colour rendition by Canon Digital Photo Professional of the raw file is identical to the jpg rendition by Firefox of the web site photo.
Be aware that DPP can be set up to not color manage. There is a preference you have to turn on to make it color manage (you should if you want to trust the color). If you see a difference between Lightroom/Photoshop and an unmanaged browser, it is usually due to the fact that the browser is unmanaged. You cannot trust an unmanaged browser to show you the correct color even on a calibrated monitor. You still should not have a color cast in the neutrals though! Perhaps you should post some examples such as a direct Lightroom export (perhaps simply a link to the panoramio page) and a screenshot of what it looks like on your machine. That could perhaps narrow the issue down.
Do images such as the third image down in the left column (labelled "sRGB Standard RGB 2.2 gamma") on this page http://www.gballard.net/psd/go_live_page_profile/embeddedJPEGprofiles.html look normal (i.e. normal skintones, not too saturated, neutral whites) on your screen?
>I don't know about Firefox 3.0, it has not been offered in the normal auto update. I don't know about the secret setting for Firefox.
Read this: http://lagemaat.blogspot.com/2008/06/firefox-30-released.html

Export jpg with sequence with LightRoom 4.2

Exporting jpgs is fine to watch them on TV or wherever. The problem is the incorrect order in the resulting filenames. They go like
pic-1
pic-10
pic-11
pic-2
pic-3
MUCH BETTER would be:
pic-001
pic-002
pic-010
pic-011
just like Photoshop Elements does it.
Any way to get that?
thnks
Ralph

Absolutely. In your Export options, you have file renaming options. These include numbering to as many padded zeroes as you want:
In order to include a particular naming item within the filename pattern, you would click Insert next to that after selecting which variant you want from the menu shown in the screenshot. This adds a corresponding new field into the template, which you can then manually edit further with removing prior items, typing in dividing spaces or dashes, fixed text etc.
If you select "sequence" numbering, for example - this should reflect any custom order you have put your images into. The first one seen in LR then becomes (e.g.) "img-001.jpg", the next "img-002.jpg" and so on. If you wanted to retain your original filename in there for reference, but still lead with this custom ordered sequence, you could assemble something like "001-[IMG_2345].jpg", "002-[IMG_2127].jpg", etc.

Strange Issue With Exporting JPgs

I am having a strange problem with exporting my vector files to jpgs. When I export the file as a .jpg then open it some of the text or shapes (like rectangles or squares) are gone. When I go back and open the .ai file the stuff is there, but it's just gone on the jpg. If I open the .ai file in Photoshop it is gone also. I have to save the file as a pdf then open the pdf in Photoshop and export as a .jpg from there. It is very strange. If I go into the Illustrator file and re-type the text that disapers, it usualy corrects the probelm. I am not an expert with Illustrator so I may be doing something wrong, if anyone can help please let me know, thanks!! (I have CS3)

I am using Windows XP with CS3, I do not see a box to uncheck it. I just
cleared the attributes and reapplied the fill color and that worked. But I
only see the overprint on the shapes but when the text is diapering I do
not see the overprint in the attributes panel nor on the shape that is behind
the text.
In a message dated 3/12/2010 11:49:57 A.M. Central Standard Time, foru
[email protected] writes:
Just uncheck the box in the Attributes panel.

How do I export jpgs as tifs with the original resolution ?

Hi,
I am very new to Lightroom 5 (I only installed it today (on Windows 8.1) :-)) but I have read Victoria Bampton's Quick Start Guide and have read a number of forum posts over the last few weeks to get an idea about how the program generally works.
I am embarking on a project to scan and archive my family's photos and videos, and I will be using Lightroom to manage the collection. To start the project, I have just imported over 10,000 digital photos taken by a variety of cameras (36 of them, according to Lightroom !) over the last 12 years or so into a new Lightroom catalogue.   These are all currently JPEG files, but I want to keep TIFF files in the collection because my research has led me to the conclusion that TIFF is a better long-term archival format.
I started by doing an Export of a small number of photos to save the .jpg files as .tif files, but when reviewing the results, I noticed that the image's resolution was changed during the export. For example, one original jpg is only 96ppi but the exported tif is 240ppi. Another jpg is 180ppi and the tif is 240ppi. At least, that's what the metadata seems to be telling me (via the Details tab of the Properties dialog in Windows), so I assume it's true...
I understand that the 240ppi that I am seeing in the .tif file metadata was specified in the Image Sizing section of the Export dialog, so that's not the issue.
I would prefer it if the .tif file has the exact same resolution (ppi) as the original .jpg, but I am unable to work out how to do it.   It would be great if the resolution setting in the Export dialog was controlled by the Resize to Fit checkbox, like the other settings in the section, but it doesn't appear to be (it's enabled even if the Resize to Fit checkbox is unticked).
I then thought about using the Library Filters to filter by the Horizontal Resolution metadata, so that I could select all the photos with the same resolution and export just those with the Resolution setting in the Export dialog set to the right number, and then repeat that process for each different group of original photos with a different resolution. Unfortunately, I have not been able to work out how to filter by the horizontal resolution metadata field - it doesn't seem to be available in the dropdown list of fields shown when I click on the up-down arrow next to the "Date" or "Camera" (etc.) columns in the Library Filter pane.
Finally, here's my question (or three):
Is there a way to export .jpgs to .tif files while keeping the original resolution ?
Alternatively, is there a way to select groups of photos by their horizontal or vertical resolution (so just those photos could be exported in a group with the right resolution specified) ?
Or is there any other way to do what I want (convert jpg to tif with the same resolution and keeping all the metadata) ?
Thanks for reading all the way through to the end.
John.

These are all currently JPEG files, but I want to keep TIFF files in the collection because my research has led me to the conclusion that TIFF is a better long-term archival format.
I'm not sure why you say this. In terms of long-term archival format, I think the two are equal, I am not aware of other reasons to do this, and thus in my opinion, the task of globally turning all your JPGs into TIFFs seems unnecessary. You don't gain anything by doing this. But you sure will spend a lot of time and take up a lot of disk space doing this.
I would prefer it if the .tif file has the exact same resolution (ppi) as the original .jpg, but I am unable to work out how to do it.
Again, I think you have embarked upon an unnecessary task. The ppi in the file is essentially meaningless. A photo that has (for example) 3000x2000 pixels saved at 240 ppi is the exact same photo as the same photo 3000x2000 saved at 180ppi, not a single pixel has changed. You are placing a meaning and importance to this ppi number that just doesn't exist.
To answer your questions at the bottom, I would advise you to not do the things you are talking about, it seems to me that you have greatly misunderstood things.

Export jpgs from final cut pro x

How do I now export jpgs from my final cut pro x?
They seemed to have changed it in the new version.

From the Share popup select Add Destinations. You see it in the Destinations preferences.

Script for moving playhead to last frame, then exporting jpg?

Hi,
I have a lot of Flash files for which I need to export jpgs of their last frame. Could a kind soul out there guide me on how to write a command for moving the timeline's playhead to the last frame, then exporting a jpg (at Full Document Size, 72 dpi, 96% quality)?
A million thanks,
Kevin

private function snapshotLastFrame():void
gotoAndStop( this.totalFrames );
_bitmapData                         = new BitmapData( stage.stageWidth, stage.stageHeight );
_bitmap                              = new Bitmap( _bitmapData );
_bitmapData.draw ( stage );
saveImageJPG( _bitmapData, "test.jpg", 96 );
public function saveImageJPG( bitmapData:BitmapData, fileName:String, quality:int ):void {
            this.jpgEncoder = new JPGEncoder( quality );
            this.fileReference = new FileReference();
            this.fileReference.save( this.jpgEncoder.encode( bitmapData ), fileName + ".jpg" );
Keep in mind that you need a few extra libraries to be able to create a jpeg.. (AS3CoreLib) can be found at googleCode.

Illustrator CS6 - Export jpg without adding artboard to name

Is there a way in Illustrator CS6 to export as jpg with Use Artboard check to not have illustrator add the name of the artboard to your file name?
Example -
File name "redboat.ai"
Export jpg "redboat.jpg" with Use Artboard option selected
File name becomes "redboat-01.jpg"
This is not a huge problem when I only have 1 or two files but when I have to rename 100+ file names it can be a pain.
I do understand that I can batch rename in Bridge but it would be nice if I could have these files saved without the artboard name on them.
Any help appreciated.

Export to .jog with use artbaords, needs to add to the name, so shen you export imaegs with multiple artbaords you do not have reapeated names.
You can do a save for web, and turn on clip to artboard and you will get the filename you need. Record an action to save the file to your desktop, and you will save even more time running this as a batch command on a folder of images.

Export jpg to new folder just copy unmodified pics

Is there a way to export jpg files to a new folder and let lightroom process only the modified pictures and leave others untouched. Here is a short example what I mean by that:
1. I take 100 photos
2. I apply edits to 50 of the photos, the other 50 look fine as is.
3. I want to export all the photos to a new folder with new names based on the event.
4. Of course my altered JPEGs will need to be reprocessed and resaved with varying degrees of JPEG compression.
5. But the photos that were not altered I’d simply like copied to the new folder with in sequence filenames
Is there a way to do that with lightroom?

Lightroom cannot do it automatically, I mean, deciding which one to export as a new recomressed JPEG and which one to just copy.
So, you'll have to separate the two groups manually and perform two separate exports.
1. Use the Library filter to separate by "Develop settings": Untouched JPEGS will be in the "Default" group, while edited jpegs will either be in custom or a develop preset.
2. Export edited with the jpeg settings you need.
3. Export unedited as "original".

Digital photo professional - export JPG from RAW

Hello!
i have a problem with program Digital photo professional, when i want export images from RAW format to JPG.
The problem is, that quality of image is much more worse, then in RAW format in DPP. JPG looks blurred and fuzzy.
IMAGE LINK:
Please check image, on the left side is print screen from RAW in DPP, on the right is exported JPG from DPP.
I want export JPG with the same quality as i see in RAW
Is there anybody to help me?
Thanks a lot.
Vit

1. open *.CR2 (raw file) in DPP
2.file/convert and save
3.type of file - EXif JPEG (JPG, JPEG)
4.image quality 10
5.output resolution 350dpi
6.check - embed icc profile in image
There are not another settings, so i dont know, why has exported JPG so bad quality...
When i open *.CR2 file in PS5, i see the same bad quality as exported JPG from DPP, but i read, that PS5, cannot
open CR2 file in best quality, because PS5 doesnt have all function, that have DPP.
I tested it on two PC, so problem is not only on my PC...
Thanks.

How to find the original RAW file # from a Lightroom exported JPG?

Hello, this is in regards to a Lightroom 3.5 exported JPG. This was a year ago when I had been told it was best to export files with simple renumbering of them from 1 to x... instead of retaining the original RAW 4-digit file name.
I've currently lost the original files, and need to do a search for them via these 4 digits to see if I have them tucked away in any of my drives. I downloaded a metadata explorer, and it's telling me all the lightroom editing information, and everything else, but somehow does not have the simplest of information — that 4 digit original file name.
Am I grasping at straws or is there likely to be any way to find this information out? I don't work with metadata, so there wouldn't have been any customizations to how Lightroom configures this....hoping that's in my favor. Any help is much appreciated!!!!

A note about security (context: downloaded apps & plugins...).
Anatomy of a URL:
protocol://stuff.stuff.stuff.domain.domain-suffix/stuff/stuff?stuff=stuff
None of this stuff matters much except:
domain.domain-suffix (and protocol, to some extent).
So if you download something from:
http://ignafradifcawhatyousay.toolonganyway.my.server.com/gogafnoics...
It's coming from server.com using http (web) protocol.
But, if you download it from:
http://my.server.com.badguy.tv/...
It's coming from badguy.tv, NOT server.com, so if you want it from server.com - danger will robins...
And, if you download from
http://216.195.245.134/my.server.com
It's coming from an unregistered internet address (216.195.245.134) - again: danger...
(4 groups of up-to-3 digits separated by dots is the format for a literal internet (IP) address, instead of domain-name...)
Summary: if you learn the anatomy of a URL, and pay attention to the URL's you are clicking on, or entering directly, you can take more responsibility for security, and assure (to a greater extent) you don't download from an unfriendly source.
Disclaimer: I accept no legal responsibility for anything that happens as a result of anything written above...
Rob

Preserving 16x9 format when exporting jpg

Hi. I am exporting from FCE, still images from a sequence using File/Export/Quicktime conversion and still image or image sequence settings. The project is from HDV and is in widescreen but the exported jpg images are 'tall and thin', indicating it has somehow converted from 16x9. I cannot find any reference to this in the FCE manual. Can you help? (I am UK based, using PAL and capturing the HDV footage using Easy Setup setting HDV-Apple Intermediate Codec 1080i50) - Thanks, Max

Why are you exporting image sequences? What are you trying to do? HDV 1080 material is normally squeezed for compression from 1920 to 1440. That's the way the HDV 1080 format is designed so that's what you get when you export an image sequence. If you're going back to video this is the best way to leave your material as it's the least manipulated that way. If you're doing something else then you have to readjust the images.

Photoshop Bug export jpg

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for