Pivot Table Section Properties - Column Heading Display

Hi guys,
I've never noticed this until today but on 10G, we had the option, when formatting the section properties of a pivot table, to choose where we wanted to display the column heading (above, before, left, none - see image below).
https://www.dropbox.com/s/orasud455twrphm/Column%20Heading%20Display.png
In 11G I can't find this option anywhere, did they remove this option or am I missing something?
Thanks
Pedro

Anyone knows the answer?
Thanks

Similar Messages

Displaying Pivot tables sections horizontally (in 11g)

I have a need to display my pivot table sections horizontally.
I've done some searching and found that some gurus named Joe Betram & John Minkjan came up with a way to do this in OBIEE 10g.
Here is where they explain it (and it's what I am trying to do now):
http://obiee101.blogspot.com/2010/01/obiee-horizontal-pivot-sections-part-2.html
I cannot get this to work in OBIEE 11g though. Does anyone know of a way to do this in OBIEE 11g?
(I am on OBIEE 11.1.1.5)
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.

You might need to change the class names as in 11g ex: PTSectsTable this is more about 10g.
Let me look into this. Just in case if you are done with this share the code

How to Sort Dimension in Pivot Table via Order Column which is changing like Factual values

Hi,
Recently in of our product offerings we got stuck on this following question:
How to Sort Dimension based on the Order Value which Keeps Changing with Factual Values??
We have a data source laid out as (example)
In the above the “Order” columns are changing per
Company/(DimensionA) for DimesnsionB.
Instead what we want is: (But only if we can get the following result without putting the “Order” Column in the “Values” Section.
If there are any configurations that we can make to our power pivot model for the similar data set so that the
DimesnionB in this case can be sorted by the Order column, would be greatly helpful to us.
Sample File:
http://tms.managility.com.au/query_example.xlsx
Thanks
Amol

Hi Amol,
According to your description, you need to sort dimension members in Pivot Table via order column, and you don't want the order column show on the Pivot table, right?
Based on my research, we can sort the data on the Pivot table based on one of the columns in that table, and we cannot sort the data based on the columns that not existed on the Pivot table. So in your scenario, to achieve your requirement, you can
add the column to pivot table and hide it.
https://support.office.com/en-gb/article/Sort-data-in-a-PivotTable-or-a-PivotChart-report-49efc50a-c8d9-4d34-a254-632794ff1e6e
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Pivot table with variables columns

I need a helo to pivot table with variable columns,
I have a pivot table :
SELECT a.*
FROM (SELECT codigo_aluno,nome_aluno , id_curso,dia FROM c_frequencia where dia like '201308%') PIVOT (sum(null) FOR dia IN ('20130805' ,'20130812','20130819','20130826')) a
but I need to run the select with values for dia , getting from a other table :
SELECT a.*
FROM (SELECT codigo_aluno,nome_aluno , id_curso,dia FROM c_frequencia where dia like '201308%') PIVOT (sum(null) FOR dia IN (
select dia from v_dia_mes )) a
thank you

The correct answer should be "Use the Pivoted Report Region Plugin".
But, as far as I know, nobody has created/posted that type of APEX plugin.
You may have to use a Basic Report (not an IR) so that you can use "Function returning SELECT" for your Source.
You would need two functions:
One that dynamically generates the Column Names
One that dynamically generates the SELECT statement
These should be in a PL/SQL Package so that the later can call the former to ensure that the column data matches the column names.
i.e. -- no 'SELECT *'
MK

Table section with 3 header rows pagination issue

Hi experts.
I have a table section pagination issue. In my case the table section combines 3 header rows.
Down bellow the series of screenshots I hope they describe my example well (click on screenshots to enlarge).
1) The data context
2) Layout elements
Here is my issue (table header output at the end of the page but there is no data row):
As you can see on the first page there is no more place for a data row but the header still exists.
if I set keep with next flag on the pagination tab for all header rows the result will be:
Is it possible somehow to fix it?
I would like to have the header row output on the page only if a data row exists bellow the header, the footer should only output if a data row exists above.
Here is PDF output:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B4wQz1XhRuysMzhiN2EyYzM tMDdjZS00Yzc3LWIyNTgtODUzZWRhY2MwYjMx&hl=en_US
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B4wQz1XhRuysNmYxNGFlOTk tZGQ2MS00MDQ3LTgyMWUtZTg4YmEwYWRmMWQ4&hl=en_US

The solutions is easy. You´d better create the corresponding DDIC objects hierarchy in the backend and then use the form to PRINT the prepared data ONLY. I mean:
In your backend:
in a row there is a dataset (table) and a optional dataset (table) == DDIC structure with two "fields" of type "table" = row A
use this "row" to create the "outer" table == DDIC table type with row A
Then you can just drag and drop this structure in your adobe form and will have do difficult with formatting.
Regards Otto

Pivot Table with Dynamic Columns and Headers

Hello,
I'm trying to pivot a table of data where the column headers will be dynamic. While I know how to pivot the table to get what I want how will I be able to pick up the table column header from the Pivot to display in the report?
For example:
Unpivoted data is Employee Code, Branch Code, Problem Code, # of Problems.
There is many records for a given Employee and Branch that I want to pivot so the Column headers are the Problem Codes and the data below is the SUM(num_problems) for that Problem.
So the data may look like this for Tech Bob, Branch NY.
Problem = LEAK, Num_problem = 5
Problem = DAMAGE, Num_problem = 2
Problem = OTHER, Num_problem = 3
Which problem codes may appear is unknown but selecting the DISTINCT(problem) across all techs gives me the column headings to use.
So if I pivot this data, I get this Row:
Tech = Bob, Branch = NY, DAMAGE = 2, LEAK = 5, OTHER = 3
So first can SSRS handle having dynamic columns? Only Tech and Branch are known and the remaining columns are dynamic based on how many Problems they worked on.
Second, how can I set the column heading in my Tablix to be the Problem Code?
Sherry

You just need to use a matrix container
Use EmployeeCode and BranchCode for row group
ProblemCode as column group and SUM([No Of Problems]) as the data expression and it will generate the columns for you based on ProblemCode values automatically.
See an example here
Sample Matrix
Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
Visakh
My MSDN Page
My Personal Blog
My Facebook Page

Pivot Table Row and Column extension OBIEE 11g

Hi,
I have pivot view report, I have 3 columns,
1) User Name
2) Date
3) Login Count
User Name will be row(Vertical)
Date will be Column heading (Horizontal)
Login Count Measures
So I will get login Count of user wrt date.
Now When I give Wide range of filter i.e, from 1st Jan 2010 to 31st Dec 2010.
There is increase in row also column, when it reaches certain extent it gives error as *'Exceeded configured maximum number of allowed input records.'*
How to change the limit? or there is any fix?
Thanks,
Satheesh

Hi,
I have also faced the same issue, i have solved by changing DefaultRowsDisplayed count in instance config file.
<Views>
<pivot table>
<DefaultRowsDisplayed>75</DefaultRowsDisplayed>
<pivot table>
</Views>
Paste that code (which i mentioned in my last post) in instanceconfig.xml before these tags
</ServerInstance>
</WebConfig>
But remember you need to restart the presentation service once this is done....
Thanks
Deva

Dynamic table with multilevel column header

Hi all ,
Can u please tell me how to create dynamic internal table and display which has two level column header using alv.
For example : | amount | year | Month |
in $
in #
oct
nov
Thanks in advance ,
SA

Hi SA,
For your first question - Creating dynamic table refer code below...
PARAMETERS: p_input TYPE i OBLIGATORY.
START-OF-SELECTION.
DATA: v_fieldname TYPE char30.
DATA: v_char TYPE numc4.
DATA: it_fldcat TYPE lvc_t_fcat.
DATA: wa_it_fldcat LIKE LINE OF it_fldcat.
DATA: gp_table TYPE REF TO data.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <gt_table> TYPE table.
DO p_input TIMES.
v_fieldname = 'COL'.
v_char = sy-index.
CONCATENATE v_fieldname v_char INTO v_fieldname.
CONDENSE v_fieldname.
CLEAR wa_it_fldcat.
wa_it_fldcat-fieldname = v_fieldname.
wa_it_fldcat-datatype = 'CHAR'.
wa_it_fldcat-outputlen = 5.
wa_it_fldcat-intlen = 5.
APPEND wa_it_fldcat TO it_fldcat .
ENDDO.
CALL METHOD cl_alv_table_create=>create_dynamic_table
EXPORTING it_fieldcatalog = it_fldcat
IMPORTING ep_table = gp_table.
ASSIGN gp_table->* TO <gt_table>.
Now you can use <gt_table> ..
2. It is not possible to have multiple format column for ALV..
Hope this solves ur prob..
Enjoy SAP.
Pankaj Singh.

Pivote table in measure column at dashboard

2)in dashboard pivot measures value click, measure value has contain example amount, that amount has (no.of names total amount ) ,that amount clicks related names displayed is possible thing?
Edited by: Ashok on Sep 24, 2010 5:09 AM
Edited by: Ashok on Sep 24, 2010 5:35 AM

Based on what I see of your example, each row of your pivot table represents the grouping for the totals at the bottom. You are asking for value interaction on the grand total amount, but that's not possible as you have it because the totals are calculated numbers.
However, the desire to click on the "45" in your example is the same as saying "I want to see the details of the 'aa,bb, cc...' grouping."
In that case do your Value Interaction on the attribute corresponding to column that has "aa,bb,cc" and "dd,ee,ff" as its values. If the user clicks on the applicable row, the detail report and can display the details of that grouping.
Hope that makes sense.

Can I make a condtional format on pivot table (Or hide columns in a Table)

I want order by some columns, but do not want show them in the Table.
I know I can do this in Pivot Table view. But then I will lost the conditional format.:(

I found a "hide" option at table's column. it works:)

Column Header Display

Hello,
I have a requirement where the columns need display as given below:
When a Material is displayed with key then the header reads as "Material".
Whe both Key and Text are display the Key column has the header as "Material", whereas the Description column does not have any header.
Is it possible any way to display the text as "Material Description".
Appreciate any ones feedback.
Thanks
Sundar

The customer is looking for the Header to read as
Material Description
Vendor Name
Plant Name etc. Since I have so many objects where this is a requirement it is a problem with the creative solution. Although that is a great way to go with.
The VB is a maintenance issue and not allowed for any of the reports. I would prefer something within BW to acheive the description.
Thanks for the quick reply.
Sundar

UiXML table - alignment of column header text

Is there a way I can get the text in the columnHeader to align differently to the column data? I have a <messageDateField> capturing a date of birth in a column. This date is only mandatory if the person is a child, so I'm databinding the 'required' attribute to get the asterisk to appear next to the box. But because some entries in the column are not mandatory, the alignment down the column doesn't look good. I'd like the <columnHeader> text to be left aligned and the <messageDateField> to be right aligned so that the date picker icons line-up.
Anybody help please?
Cheers
Ian
ps I'm using encapsulated <column>s.

Hi Ian,
You can't directly set the alignment of column headers or data. The way it works is that you can specify a columnFormat inside your column for example:
<columnFormat columnDataFormat="iconButtonFormat"/>
And then UIX will decide how to align the header and data in teh column for that type of data. I don't believe there is a way to control the alignment of the column header independently of the columnDataFormat.

Simple 9 column table with a column header

I have looked for hours at the docs for creating a scrollable table. I think what I want is so simple, that the complexity of the docs overwhelms me. I need a jTable that once is fills over 8 rows, it begins to scroll. The table then is 9 columns wide by 8 rows in height. Each of the 9 columns are not the same size. Can anyone get me started with creating this ??? Sorry, I have no duke $$. :o(

I actually had to change a few things. The latest code is a follows:
My vertical lines appeared when I added the row,col(8,9) in the DefaultTableModel. And when I did that, the model.add... actually produced 18 columns, so I had to change to "model.setColumnIdentifiers()" to fix that. So the only part is the centered headers. That's gotta be Netbeans. I'm using jBuilder 2005. Thanks for your input. I'm almost there. :o)
int columnWidths[] = {24,27,115,30,40,33,46,46,25};
String columnIDs[] = {"Trans #","Ticket","Transaction Code","Gallons",
                        "Price","Variance","Charge Amt","Credit Amt","Age"};
DefaultTableModel model = new DefaultTableModel(8,9);
JTable jTable1 = new JTable(model);
jTable1.setFont(new java.awt.Font("Courier New", Font.PLAIN, 13));
    jTable1.setPreferredSize(new Dimension(620, 160));
    jTable1.setAutoResizeMode(JTable.AUTO_RESIZE_OFF);
    jTable1.setShowHorizontalLines(false);
    model.setColumnIdentifiers(columnIDs);
    for( int j = 0; j < 9; j++ ) {
      TableColumn col = jTable1.getColumnModel().getColumn(j);
      col.setPreferredWidth(columnWidths[j]);
    jScrollPane1.setHorizontalScrollBarPolicy(JScrollPane.
                                              HORIZONTAL_SCROLLBAR_NEVER);

How to display the column into the narrative or section from pivot table

I have a report. I have the basic number displayed in the pivot table, but missing one column and I need move one column to the top. The column missing (% of tested) should be calculated by column c /column F's last number, ie, F7=48. My desired column would be H3=c3/F48 9/48, H4=c4/F488/48.... But I could not get the number 48 into my formula, because it is the running total of the all column E. These data is in Pivot table.
I also need display No of Students 74 in the top of the report. I am not able to get this number from pivot table. It is count distinct on student key from the repository.
I appreciate any help.
A     B     C     D     E     F     G
2          # of Questions     Average # Correct     % Correct     Running total no. of test items     No of students
3     PATTERNS, FUNCTIONS, AND ALGEBRA     9     4.68     51.95     9     74
4     PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS     8     3.97     49.66     17     74
5     MEASUREMENT AND GEOMETRY     11     6.11     55.53     28     74
6     NUMBER AND NUMBER SENSE     8     4.16     52.03     36     74
7     COMPUTATION AND ESTIMATION     12     8.2     68.36     48     74
Edited by: user7315022 on Feb 3, 2010 2:28 PM

I wish it was this easy. I must not explain it right. All the score from each student and each question for each subject and each test is stored in database. The number of question for the subject is the max of the questions for each subject. Basically, it needs 'parittion by'... But in the OBIEE, it would not let me add any 'partition by' in the column formula. Is this true? ie, can you use partition by in the column formula? Here are the query from trace file.
RqList
TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME as c1 GB,
REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR as c2 GB,
MAX_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.MAX_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] as c3 GB,
STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER as c4 GB,
DIVISION_TOTAL_TESTS:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.DIVISION_TOTAL_TESTS by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] as c5 GB,
RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME as c6 GB,
RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME as c7 GB,
TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME as c8 GB,
SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME as c9 GB,
SUM_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.SUM_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] as c10 GB,
SUM_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.SUM_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] / nullif( COUNT_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.COUNT_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] , 0) as c11 GB,
MAX_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.MAX_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] as c12 GB,
(SUM_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.SUM_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] / nullif( COUNT_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.COUNT_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] , 0)) / nullif( MAX_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.MAX_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] , 0) * 100 as c13 GB,
STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY as c14 GB,
STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY as c15 GB,
max(SUM_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.SUM_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] )] by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] at_distinct [ ] ) / nullif( max(COUNT_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.COUNT_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] )] by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] at_distinct [ ] ) , 0) as c16 GB,
(max(SUM_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.SUM_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] )] by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] at_distinct [ ] ) / nullif( max(COUNT_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.COUNT_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] )] by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] at_distinct [ ] ) , 0)) / nullif( max(MAX_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.MAX_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] )] by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] at_distinct [ ] ) , 0) * 100 as c17 GB
DetailFilter: RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME = 'GRADE 5' and SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME = 'GLASGOW MIDDLE' and TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME = 'RAW SCORE' and TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME = 'SPRING' and REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR = '200102' and TESTS.TEST_ID = 'SOL' and TEST_DEFINITIONS.PARENT_TEST_SUBJECT_NAME = 'MATHEMATICS' and STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER < 900
OrderBy: c1 asc, c2 asc, c4 asc, c6 asc, c7 asc, c8 asc, c9 asc, c14 asc, c15 asc
+++azadams:320000:32001b:----2010/02/03 16:48:36
-------------------- Sending query to database named tacdev (id: <<51109>>):
select distinct D1.c5 as c1,
D1.c4 as c2,
D1.c9 as c3,
D1.c14 as c4,
D1.c12 as c5,
D1.c6 as c6,
D1.c7 as c7,
D1.c15 as c8,
D1.c8 as c9,
D1.c11 as c10,
D1.c11 / decode(D1.c10 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c10) as c11,
D1.c9 as c12,
(D1.c11 / decode(D1.c10 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c10)) / decode(D1.c9 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c9) * 100 as c13,
D1.c13 as c14,
D1.c16 as c15,
D1.c3 / decode(D1.c2 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c2) as c16,
(D1.c3 / decode(D1.c2 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c2)) / decode(D1.c1 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c1) * 100 as c17
from
(select max(D1.c1) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c5, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c8) as c1,
sum(D1.c2) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c5, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c8) as c2,
sum(D1.c3) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c5, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c8) as c3,
D1.c4 as c4,
D1.c5 as c5,
D1.c6 as c6,
D1.c7 as c7,
D1.c8 as c8,
max(D1.c1) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c16, D1.c5, D1.c13, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c15, D1.c8) as c9,
sum(D1.c2) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c16, D1.c5, D1.c13, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c15, D1.c8) as c10,
sum(D1.c3) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c16, D1.c5, D1.c13, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c15, D1.c8) as c11,
sum(D1.c12) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c16, D1.c5, D1.c13, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c15, D1.c8) as c12,
D1.c13 as c13,
D1.c14 as c14,
D1.c15 as c15,
D1.c16 as c16
from
(select max(T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER) as c1,
count(T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER) as c2,
sum(T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER) as c3,
T33435.SCHOOL_YEAR as c4,
T34232.TEST_SEASON_NAME as c5,
T52429.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME as c6,
T52429.TEST_LEVEL_NAME as c7,
T59709.SCHOOL_NAME as c8,
count(T36922.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY) as c12,
T36922.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY as c13,
T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER as c14,
T56693.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME as c15,
T36922.STUDENTS_KEY as c16
from
SCHOOLS T59709,
TEST_DEFINITIONS T58733,
TEST_SCORE_TYPES T56693,
RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS T52429,
TEST_YEAR_SEASONS T34232,
REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS T33435,
TESTS T34149,
DETAIL_TEST_SCORES T33341,
STUDENT_STANDARD_TEST T36922,
TEST_SCORES T56699
where ( T33341.TEST_SCORE_TYPES_KEY = T56693.TEST_SCORE_TYPES_KEY and T36922.ADMIN_SCHOOLS_KEY = T59709.SCHOOLS_KEY and T34232.TEST_YEAR_SEASONS_KEY = T36922.TEST_YEAR_SEASONS_KEY and T33435.REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS_KEY = T36922.REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS_KEY and T34149.TESTS_KEY = T36922.TESTS_KEY and T36922.TEST_DEFINITIONS_KEY = T58733.TEST_DEFINITIONS_KEY and T33341.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY = T36922.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY and T33341.TEST_SCORES_KEY = T56699.TEST_SCORES_KEY and T33435.SCHOOL_YEAR = '200102' and T34149.TEST_ID = 'SOL' and T34232.TEST_SEASON_NAME = 'SPRING' and T36922.RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS_KEY = T52429.RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS_KEY and T52429.TEST_LEVEL_NAME = 'GRADE 5' and T56693.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME = 'RAW SCORE' and T58733.PARENT_TEST_SUBJECT_NAME = 'MATHEMATICS' and T59709.SCHOOL_NAME = 'GLASGOW MIDDLE' and T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER < 900 )
group by T33435.SCHOOL_YEAR, T34232.TEST_SEASON_NAME, T36922.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, T36922.STUDENTS_KEY, T52429.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, T52429.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, T56693.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER, T59709.SCHOOL_NAME
) D1
) D1

Some of the pivot table header column not center-aligned

I've dragged a pivot table model from Data Controls. The generated pivot table on page does not display some of the header columns center-aligned. I tried to set a css style in HeaderFormat listener for the columns, but it did not work. I checked the html source code and found the problem was caused by "colspan" not created properly. I'd like to know how pivot table header columns are created, anyone who knows please kindly give some tips,thanks!

Try setting the Header Row to allow to repeat. I've had to set that Repeat option to get things to break over pages correctly.
Ryan D. Lunka
Cardinal Solutions Group
[email protected]

Pivot Table Section Properties - Column Heading Display

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for