PL 05 Bizflow blocked in processing status

Hello,
I just install the PL05 of B1i, with JDBC driver for SQL server 2005.
I tried to resubmit MATMAS03 object via B1i: extras/Error Inbox/<My subsidiary>/Retry, the object is removed from the error list but is not processed (no line is logged in B1i: Extras/Message log),
I also tried to resend MATMAS03 object from R3, and i can see the objects in "Processing" status but they are blocked in this step, and never change status.
Somebody has information on this PL05 issue ?
Thanks,
Fabrice.
PS: i also tried with a DEBMAS05 object and the same behaviour occurs.

Re-installing solved the problem (...hopefully !!!)

Similar Messages

Overall Processing status for Service Order is incorrect

On Service order the overall processing status is incorrect at the header. It remains in status Being Processed even though it is fully processed. Any suggestions on where to look?

Can you elaborate a bit more.
starting from creation of service order to outbound delivery.
as per my understanding, if you want to do service order process with goods movement.
In our current client, we are planning to do in below method:
Customer requests for the service, this service is done in 2 ways,
1- Service at customer site
2- service from plant
in First case, service request will be created from VA01- order related billing. Technician will be sent to customer site along with the spare parts,with ref to this order. Once job is done.Technician will get acknowledgement from customer. Once technicians submit this , then authorized person will remove the billing block from service order, do issue invoice.
Service order is copy of OR w/o delivery & with order related billing,inlcuding billing block in OR type.
Fine tune the relevant settings in config.
2-Service from Plant,
Create service request, is copy of RE, inward the matererial with PGR. once jobwork is done, create Confirm Service order ( copy of OR ) with ref to above Service Req, create outbound delivery-PGI & Invoice.
Hope it helps,
Thought of others in similar scenario with any difference will be really helpful.

How to change 'Processing status' of Purchase Requisition

Hi Workflow Gurus,
I have query on Purchase Rquisition Item Release Workflow. My requirement is like,
Whenever a PR approver rejects the PR item then the processing status of the PR item should be changed from "In Process" to 'Release Refused' without any user intervention i.e. in background.
Please help me ASAP as I have my delivery deadline already coming in.
Many thanks in Advance!!!
Regards,
Vikash

Hi PJ,
Mentioned BAPI is not for changing the processing status but for Release status i.e. Blocked or released etc...
I could get the solution by my own R&D. I am updating the database field EBAN-BANPR with required status and i am doing it in the Back ground.
Its working fine now.
Anyways Thanks for your quick response !
Regards,
Vikash

Reset Processing Status function for Custom Document does not exist?

Expert,
I have a need to reset Process Status of Custom Document from
"Blocked - Awaiting Reply from Authorities" to previous status. Many times we will receive error messages from US AES and require further processing and resent.
According to help.sap.com documentation, i should be able to find this function through
System Administration. Choose System Monitoring ® Status of Customs Declarations/Shipments.
I don't seem to be able to find this in our GTS 7.20 system. I have SP 009.
Please help.
Thank you,
Wen

ok. I received the answer from SAP. The transaction to reset processing status of custom declaration is
/n/SAPSLL/CDOC_STARES accessible through role Menu /SAPSLL/LEG_SYS_COMM.
Wen

Processing status in vk11 condition record creation

Dear All
i have a scenario where condition record is created in vk11 the processing status should be blocked by default,
super user will remove the block or release it in vk12
How to configure this
Regards
J

Hi,
1. First Go to SPRO --> Sales & DIstribution ---> Basic Functions --> Pricing --> Define Processing Status
   Click on new Entries Create
                  1 Not released A - Blocked
                  2 Released - Released
2. Create Condition Record Using T-Code VK11 , after entering the Details with your combination then click on "Shift+F8 " or Click on "Key" you will get one more screen in that we have to select the "Processing Status " ( In your case Give 1 ) and save the condition Record (or)
In VK11 , after material Description we can find out the "Processing status " Column , there you have to mentioned "1" and save
3. Ask your Basis Consultant to whom you want to give the Release Approval , he/ she can give the approval in VK12
Regards,
Prasanna
Edited by: prasanna_sap on Jul 3, 2011 8:25 AM

Overall processing status issue for sales order regarding services

Hello,
I have the following issue. I am billing a standard service (service without delivery) to a customer. The process goes ok, I issue an invoice, post it and generate an accounting document. Then I create a cancellation invoice. Now I want to reject my sales order. I assign reason for rejection to the item. The header and item status says it is u2018fully rejectedu2019, but the overall processing status says the sales order is u2018openu2019 and therefore appears in reports regarding open orders. I gave also a billing block, deleted the schedule line for the service so that the ordered quantity for the item equals to u20180u2019, but still the overall processing status of the order is u2018openu2019. This is standard SAP functionality (as I checked it). So can anyone explain me how to change this status to exclude this order from open order list? Or maybe someone may want to explain me why this is standard SAP process and what is the reason for the system to want to keep my order u2018openu2019?
Thanks in advance,
BR,|

Place the reason for rejection in the status tab at item level, we are doing same, and the order lines does not show in open lines .
Regards
Chandrasekhar

Processing Status

Hi All,
We have 2 processing status in VK11
Blocked
Released
While creating the condition record by default it will be “2”. Is there a way where we can reset the processing status back to “1” if anyone changes the price in VK12.
Regards
AMK

Hi
For this you need to write your logic in following BADI. Ask you ABAPER and tell him that you want to save status 2 or 1 whenever user saves condition record after making some changes.
SD_COND_SAVE_A
Thank$

Processing Status on Sales Order

I am configuring in SAP R/3 a Free Third Party Sales Order . . . The problem I am having is with the Processing Status area . . . specifically the Overall Status for the Header and the Item. With the new set up neither of those fields show on the sales order, and so the order does not show up on VA05 as open when first entered. What would need to be done in configuration for these fields to be on the sales order, and to show the appropriate status?
Update . . . The only way so far I have found to have these fields show on the sales order is by using the Completion on the item category, but from what I am reading it is not the suggested way to do it, yet the only way so far to get it on there. And, the problem here is when in MIRO the PO on the Free Third Party Order, it does not complete the Sales Order Header or Item, so I still am unable to get the status to change.
Any ideas?
Edited by: Diane Thacker on Aug 4, 2009 9:41 PM

Hi,
Per standard process, the sales process will not complete unless the billing has been done for the sales order.
What this means is once MIRO is done, the sales order is eligible for billing. You must complete the billing, so that the sales order wont appear in the VA05 list. Until billing is completed, the sales order status remains open.
Regards

Sale order Processing status

Hi gurus,
Where we check the sale order processing status configuration ?
Regards,
T.Murugu

Dear Murugu
If you see the document flow of the particular sales document, you can see the status.
If you want to know where the control is, go to VTLA, for the combination of your order type and delivery type, select your item category and execute. There you can see a field Update document flow. You have to check this box for status updation.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Report to check Po o/p processing status & details

Dear experts ,
Is there a standard SAP report that give me the details of a PO o/p type processing status with details ?
Regards
Anis

Dear Jurgen ,
Thx for the update , but ME9F is an executable report , also it doesnt have the message details in the o/p screen . I wanted an information report for end user that would just tell him if the output exitsis & if yes what is its status & other details .
Regards
Anis

Processing status code error

Hi all,
What does processing status code "Error" indicate in rcv_headers_interface.There is no error message in po_interface_errors.There is nothing available in the log of Receiving Transaction Processor.Can someone guide me what exactly this means?
Thanks in advance!!

Hi Sandy;
Please see below notes which could be helpful
Resolving records stuck in the Receiving Transactions Interface [ID 50903.1]
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19509-01/820-4390/ggtrm/index.html
Regard
Helios

Purchase order processing status

Hi
I have a doubt regarding the purchase order processing status in the PO.
Chk table EKKO field PROCSTAT.
Can anyboby tell me the status sequence of a PO.
ie: when a PO will have the corresponding status
for ex if a PO is subject to release and if is released then the status will be 05 release completed.
Likewise need to know for other status particularly interrested in knowing status 08, 04 and 01.
Reg
Raja

>01 Version in process
when Version Management is activated and it is processed once then this indicator will come
>02 Active
after po creation or if the po is on hold this will be used
>03 In release
when the po is subjected to release and Release is Possible
>04 Partially released
when PO is Partly Released itemised release
>05 Release completed
release completed and now can be processed further
>08 Rejected
when the release of po is rejected or cancelled
regards
kunal

Massive Query blocking other Processes

Hi
We are having a Sharepoint 2010 server and we have deployed a dot net custom application on it. Recently the application was working slow and the same was observed on out of box created lists using the out of box UI.
We found that it was originating from a SQL query which was blocking other processes.
Now this problem, occurs intermittently and goes away on its own in some time(~10 minutes). The query responsible is :
SELECT TOP(@NUMROWS) t1.[Type] AS c0, UserData.[ntext2], UserData.[datetime1], UserData.[nvarchar10], t6.[nvarchar5] AS c14c15, UserData.[float2], UserData.[int8], UserData.[tp_ItemOrder], UserData.[nvarchar1], t15.[nvarchar6] AS c36c34, UserData.[ntext1], UserData.[int7], UserData.[float1], UserData.[nvarchar19], UserData.[tp_ID], UserData.[nvarchar5], t5.[nvarchar4] AS c12c13, UserData.[bit1], t11.[nvarchar3] AS c24c25, UserData.[int11], t14.[nvarchar6] AS c30c34, t15.[tp_ID] AS c36c32, UserData.[tp_GUID], t1.[ProgId] AS c42, t1.[SortBehavior] AS c1, UserData.[tp_Author], UserData.[tp_Editor], UserData.[int1], UserData.[int6], UserData.[nvarchar13], UserData.[ntext5], UserData.[datetime4], UserData.[nvarchar18], UserData.[tp_ContentTypeId], t8.[nvarchar3] AS c18c19, UserData.[int10], t15.[tp_Created] AS c36c35, UserData.[tp_WorkflowVersion], t1.[LeafName] AS c37, UserData.[tp_Version], t1.[Id] AS c4, UserData.[nvarchar4], UserData.[nvarchar9], t14.[tp_ID] AS c30c32, t1.[TimeLastModified] AS c40, UserData.[tp_IsCurrentVersion], UserData.[tp_HasCopyDestinations], UserData.[tp_Level], t4.[nvarchar3] AS c10c11, UserData.[int5], t10.[nvarchar3] AS c22c23, UserData.[nvarchar12], UserData.[ntext4], UserData.[datetime3], UserData.[nvarchar17], t2.[nvarchar3] AS c6c7, UserData.[nvarchar20], UserData.[datetime8], UserData.[tp_HasAttachment], UserData.[tp_Modified], CASE WHEN DATALENGTH(t1.DirName) = 0 THEN t1.LeafName WHEN DATALENGTH(t1.LeafName) = 0 THEN t1.DirName ELSE t1.DirName + N'/' + t1.LeafName END AS c2, UserData.[nvarchar3], UserData.[nvarchar8], t7.[nvarchar3] AS c16c17, t13.[Status1] AS c28c29, t14.[tp_Created] AS c30c35, t15.[nvarchar4] AS c36c33, UserData.[tp_UIVersion], t1.[ItemChildCount] AS c43, UserData.[tp_CopySource], UserData.[nvarchar11], UserData.[ntext3], UserData.[datetime2], UserData.[nvarchar16], UserData.[tp_InstanceID], t3.[nvarchar3] AS c8c9, UserData.[int4], t9.[nvarchar3] AS c20c21, UserData.[int9], UserData.[float3], UserData.[datetime7], UserData.[tp_UIVersionString], t1.[TimeCreated] AS c38, t1.[ScopeId] AS c5, UserData.[nvarchar2], UserData.[nvarchar7], t14.[nvarchar4] AS c30c33, t15.[nvarchar1] AS c36c31, t1.[ClientId] AS c41, UserData.[int3], t12.[nvarchar3] AS c26c27, UserData.[datetime6], UserData.[tp_Created], UserData.[tp_ModerationStatus], UserData.[nvarchar6], UserData.[tp_WorkflowInstanceID], t1.[FolderChildCount] AS c44, t1.[MetaInfo] AS c3, UserData.[nvarchar14], t14.[nvarchar1] AS c30c31, UserData.[int2], UserData.[datetime5], t1.[DirName] AS c39 FROM AllUserData AS UserData WITH(INDEX=AllUserData_PK) INNER JOIN Docs AS t1 WITH(NOLOCK) ON (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t1.SiteId=UserData.tp_SiteId) AND (t1.SiteId = @SITEID) AND (t1.ParentId = UserData.tp_ParentId) AND (t1.Id = UserData.tp_DocId) AND ( (UserData.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t1.Level = UserData.tp_Level) AND (t1.IsCurrentVersion = 1) AND (t1.Level = 1 OR t1.Level = 2) AND (UserData.[tp_ListID] =@LISTID) AND (UserData.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (UserData.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (UserData.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t2 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int1]=t2.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t2.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t2.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t2.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t2.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t2.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t2.tp_ListId = @L2) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t3 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int2]=t3.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t3.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t3.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t3.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t3.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t3.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t3.tp_ListId = @L4) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t4 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int3]=t4.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t4.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t4.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t4.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t4.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t4.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t4.tp_ListId = @L5) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t5 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int4]=t5.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t5.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t5.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t5.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t5.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t5.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t5.tp_ListId = @L5) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t6 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int5]=t6.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t6.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t6.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t6.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t6.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t6.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t6.tp_ListId = @L6) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t7 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int6]=t7.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t7.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t7.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t7.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t7.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t7.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t7.tp_ListId = @L7) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t8 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int7]=t8.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t8.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t8.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t8.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t8.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t8.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t8.tp_ListId = @L8) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t9 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int8]=t9.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t9.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t9.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t9.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t9.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t9.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t9.tp_ListId = @L9) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t10 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int9]=t10.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t10.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t10.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t10.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t10.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t10.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t10.tp_ListId = @L10) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t11 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int10]=t11.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t11.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t11.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t11.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t11.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t11.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t11.tp_ListId = @L11) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t12 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[int11]=t12.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t12.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t12.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t12.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t12.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t12.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t12.tp_ListId = @L12) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN Workflow AS t13 WITH(NOLOCK) ON ( CAST ( CAST (UserData.[nvarchar18]AS VARBINARY) AS UNIQUEIDENTIFIER)=t13.[ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t13.SiteId = @SITEID) AND (t13.WebId = @WEBID) AND (t13.ListId = UserData.tp_ListId) AND (t13.ItemId = UserData.tp_Id) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t14 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[tp_Author]=t14.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t14.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t14.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t14.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t14.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t14.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t14.tp_ListId = @L14) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) LEFT OUTER LOOP JOIN AllUserData AS t15 WITH(NOLOCK,INDEX=AllUserData_PK) ON (UserData.[tp_Editor]=t15.[tp_ID]) AND (UserData.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND (t15.[tp_RowOrdinal] = 0) AND ( (t15.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (t15.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (t15.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (t15.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (t15.tp_ListId = @L14) AND (UserData.tp_ListId = @L3) WHERE (UserData.[tp_CalculatedVersion] = 0 ) AND (UserData.[tp_IsCurrentVersion] = CONVERT(bit,1) ) AND (UserData.[tp_DeleteTransactionId] = 0x ) AND (UserData.tp_ListID=@LISTID) AND ( (UserData.tp_Level = 1) ) AND (UserData.tp_SiteId=@SITEID) AND (UserData.tp_RowOrdinal=0) AND (t1.SiteId=@SITEID AND (t1.DirName=@DN OR t1.DirName LIKE @DNEL+N'/%') AND t1.SortBehavior=0) ORDER BY UserData.[tp_ID] ASC OPTION (FORCE ORDER, MAXDOP 1
Any ideas what is causing this? Any background process or the custom code.
Thanks
Akshay

This looks like a standard List query (could be any list).
Make sure your List View Threshold is 5000 or less (this is set on the Web Application, primarily). Lists that are queried for >5000 rows will introduce a table locking read.
Make sure your SQL Server is set to a Max Degree of Parallelism of 1, as well.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Can we set "IN PROCESS" Status to more than one User

Hi,
As per my client current scenario every work item will be sent to 3 useru2019s (One is the supervisor of the other two users). If any one of the user executes the work item it will automatically call a Ztransaction and displays the screen. When any one of the user executes the workitem, then the workitems will dissappears from rest of the users inboxes; Setting "IN PROCESS" status for the person who executed the workitem. The workitem will be in "IN PROCESS" Status untill the User Press "SAVE" button in the transaction.
If the person whose executed the workitem (IN PROCESS) status, has gone on unplanned leave; then the supervisor wants to forward the workitem of the current user to other user. How can he forward?
Is there any option to set "In Process" status to more than one User? [Supervisor and Person who executed the workitem]
Please provide me any advice to the above requirement.
Thanks in advance,
Ajay Kumar

Can you ask your workflow administrator to forward the workitem to the user you want to be sent it to.
I tried a small case wherein I had forwarded a workitem to myself and another user.
As I executed it , it went into status IN process and at the same time it got removed from other users inbox .
Now I went to T Code SWI1 and forwarded iut to another user say USABC.
As a result the workitem again went into status "Ready" and into the inbox of the user ABC.
So , you can try this in your case with the help of your workflow administrator.
Another way is to create the other user as a substitue of the user who is currently executing the workitem.

Process is always in Processing Status

Hello
i created the UDT2UDT scenario as the official document
but always it appears in processing status
is there any missing config?
how can i nresolve it?

I found that my messages would hang forever in "Processing" if there was an error in the XSL.
The way I finally figured this out was to go to the technical error monitor in the B1iP dashboard (NOT the B1iSN one). I can't remember the exact path but there's a monitoring section there with two subsections of Event monitor and technical error monitor.
When I opened the technical error monitor I could see a German error message (although I was working in English) that began something like "Die formatvorlage.." Google translate told me it basically said the transformation could not be completed.
If you are using XMLSpy, it has the ability to test your XSL by passing it the B1i message (even the one stuck in processing, as it already contains the sender payload) through it and showing you the result.

PL 05 Bizflow blocked in processing status

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for