Plan version locked for certain users

Hi,
Could someone help me regarding this issue.
We would like to lock a plan version for some users and some users have to be able to work with that plan version.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards.

Hi Judit,
Customizing: Controlling / general controlling / organizaion / maintain versions:
Choose the version you want to work with, tick "controlling area settings" and in the rigth screen, scroll to the right until you view the field "AUGR".
Read F1-help for this field and contact the authorization responsible to go on with that.
best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

Forward mail to MS Exchange for certain users

Hello.
We have a "master" Oracle Messaging Exchange Server and we have recently installed a Microsoft Messaging Server. We need certain users to use MS Exchange. The idea is changing mailHost LDAP attribute for those users (let's take [email protected] as an example), setting the MS Exchange HUB server, let's say hub.domain.com (mailHost: hub.domain.com). Doing so, mails sent to [email protected] are sent to hub.domain.com using lmtp channel. Everything works fine except for an issue: MS Exchange sees the from address like "user@lmtpcs-daemon", so we have to configure MS Exchange to use "lmtpcs-daemon" as secondary domain of domain.com, otherwise it doesn't know what to do with those mails.
Is there a way to not do that rewrite for certain users? Or maybe can we create a new channel to forward mails to Exchange? Could we define a channel depending on mailHost value or something like that?
Any thoughts?
Thank you very much.

Thank you very much for your inputs.
It's being quite difficult for me to understand this whole mail routing thing. According to the documentation:
"The handling of a missing mailhost attribute is different depending on whether the entry is a user or a group. In the case of a user, a mailhost is essential, so if no mailhost attribute is present a new address of the form
@smarthost:user@domain
is constructed using the smart host for the domain determined by the LDAP_DOMAIN_ATTR_SMARTHOST MTA option"
Sounds good, it seems that I just need to delete mailHost attribute for the users who need to use Exchange and set LDAP_DOMAIN_ATTR_SMARTHOST in option.dat. I've tried that but I get a "4.0.0 temporary error returned by alias expansion" when I send a mail to the test user.
I've deleted the LDAP_DOMAIN_ATTR_SMARTHOST line and I've set mailRoutingSmartHost LDAP attribute for the user but I get the same result.
I'm not even sure about the mailRoutingSmartHost format. This is what I have:
mailRoutingSmartHost: correoweb.saludcastillayleon.es
root@MTA1 # imsimta test -rewrite -debug [email protected]
Initializing mm_.
Initializing mm_ submission.
Checking identifiers.
*** Debug output from initializing MM for submission:
09:49:06.60: Debug output enabled, system MTA1.domain.com, process 41f0.1, message enqueue routines version V6.3 compiled Mar 14 2008 17:07:19
09:49:06.60: mmc_winit('l','[email protected]','[email protected]') called.
09:49:06.60: Address reversal invoked on [email protected], force reverse URL 1, capture 1
09:49:06.60: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "mta1.domain.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.60: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.60: Found: "$A$E$F$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.60: Rewrite failed, not forward.
09:49:06.60: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
09:49:06.60: Failed.
09:49:06.60: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
09:49:06.60: Failed
09:49:06.60: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "mta1", domain = "mta1.domain.com", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.60: Rewrite: "mta1.domain.com", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.60: Found: "$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.60: New mailbox: "postmaster".
09:49:06.60: New host: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.60: New route: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.60: New channel system: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.60: Looking up host "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.60: - found on channel l
09:49:06.60: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
09:49:06.60: Checking reverse URL cache for: [email protected]
09:49:06.60: Applying reverse URL pattern ldap:///$V?$N?sub?$R to: [email protected]
09:49:06.68: URL generation failed, status = 0
09:49:06.68: Mapped return address: [email protected]
09:49:06.68: from_access mapping check: ||MAIL|l|[email protected]|
09:49:06.68: Queue area size 145940970, temp area size 21837182
09:49:06.68: 36485242 blocks of effective free queue space available; setting disk limit accordingly.
09:49:06.68: 10918591 blocks of free temporary space available; setting disk limit accordingly.
09:49:06.68: - passed.
09:49:06.68: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "mta1.domain.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.68: Found: "$A$E$F$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.68: Rewrite failed, not forward.
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
09:49:06.68: Failed.
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
09:49:06.68: Failed
09:49:06.68: Rewriting: Mbox = "postmaster", host = "mta1", domain = "mta1.domain.com", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "mta1.domain.com", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.68: Found: "$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.68: New mailbox: "postmaster".
09:49:06.68: New host: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.68: New route: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.68: New channel system: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.68: Looking up host "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.68: - found on channel l
09:49:06.68: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
*** Debug output from rewriting a forward header address:
09:49:06.68: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.68: Found: "$A$E$F$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.68: Rewrite failed, not envelope.
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
09:49:06.68: Failed.
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
09:49:06.68: Failed
09:49:06.68: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "saludcastillayleon", domain = "domain.com", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "domain.com", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.68: Found: "$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.68: New mailbox: "user".
09:49:06.68: New host: "domain.com".
09:49:06.68: New route: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.68: New channel system: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.68: Looking up host "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.68: - found on channel l
09:49:06.68: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
09:49:06.68: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.68: Found: "$A$E$F$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.68: Rewrite failed, not envelope.
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "$*", position 1, hash table -
09:49:06.68: Failed.
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, rewrite database -
09:49:06.68: Failed
09:49:06.68: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain", domain = "domain.com", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.68: Rewrite: "domain.com", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.68: Found: "$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.68: New mailbox: "user".
09:49:06.68: New host: "domain.com".
09:49:06.68: New route: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.68: New channel system: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.68: Looking up host "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.68: - found on channel l
09:49:06.68: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
09:49:06.68: Rewrite rules result: [email protected]
09:49:06.68: Checking reverse URL cache for: [email protected]
09:49:06.68: Applying reverse URL pattern ldap:///$V?$N?sub?$R to: [email protected]
09:49:06.69: Resulting URL: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.com?preferredlanguage,mailmsgmaxblocks,mail,mailalternateaddress,mailequivalentaddress?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])([email protected]))
09:49:06.69: mmc_open_url called to open ldap:///o%3Ddomain.com?preferredlanguage,mailmsgmaxblocks,mail,mailalternateaddress,mailequivalentaddress?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])([email protected])), flags = 384
09:49:06.69: URL with quotes stripped: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.com?preferredlanguage,mailmsgmaxblocks,mail,mailalternateaddress,mailequivalentaddress?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])([email protected]))
09:49:06.69: LDAP URL identified
09:49:06.69: URL context #1 will be used
09:49:06.69: Performing URL search on: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.com?preferredlanguage,mailmsgmaxblocks,mail,mailalternateaddress,mailequivalentaddress?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])([email protected]))
09:49:06.70: mmc_read_url result: [uid=user, ou=People, o=domain.com]
09:49:06.70: URL resolution returned: [uid=user, ou=People, o=domain.com]
09:49:06.70: mmc_read_url result: [preferredlanguage] en
09:49:06.70: URL resolution returned: [preferredlanguage] en
09:49:06.70: Attribute index: 0
09:49:06.70: LDAP URL produced preferred language en
09:49:06.70: mmc_read_url result: [mail] [email protected]
09:49:06.70: URL resolution returned: [mail] [email protected]
09:49:06.70: Attribute index: 0
09:49:06.70: LDAP URL produced address [email protected]
09:49:06.70: mmc_read_url result: [mailalternateaddress] [email protected]
09:49:06.70: URL resolution returned: [mailalternateaddress] [email protected]
09:49:06.70: Attribute index: 0
09:49:06.70: Alternate address [email protected]
09:49:06.70: No more results to return
*** Debug output from rewriting a forward envelope address:
09:49:06.70: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.70: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.70: Found: "$A$E$F$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.70: Match, pattern = "domain.com", current = "(*domaincheck*)"
09:49:06.70: old state = not checked.
09:49:06.70: Domain check on domain.com.
09:49:06.70: Added domain result 1 to cache for domain.com.
09:49:06.70: new state = succeeded.
09:49:06.70: New mailbox: "user".
09:49:06.70: New host: "domain.com".
09:49:06.70: New route: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.70: New channel system: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.70: Looking up host "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.70: - found on channel l
09:49:06.70: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
address channel = l
forward channel = l
channel description =
channel caption =
channel user filter =
dest channel filter =
source channel filter =
channel flags #0 = BIDIRECTIONAL MULTIPLE IMMNONURGENT NOSERVICEALL
channel flags #1 = NOSMTP DEFAULT
channel flags #2 = COPYSENDPOST COPYWARNPOST POSTHEADONLY HEADERINC NOEXPROUTE
channel flags #3 = LOGGING NORESTRICTED RETAINSECURITYMULTIPARTS
channel flags #4 = EIGHTBIT HEADERKEEPORDER NOHEADERREAD RULES
channel flags #5 = TRUNCATESMTPLONGLINES
channel flags #6 = LOCALUSER REPORTNOTARY
channel flags #7 = NOSWITCHCHANNEL NOREMOTEHOST DATEFOUR DAYOFWEEK
channel flags #8 = NODEFRAGMENT EXQUOTA REVERSE NOCONVERT_OCTET_STREAM
channel flags #9 = NOTHURMAN INTERPRETENCODING USEINTERMEDIATE RECEIVEDFROM VALIDATELOCALSYSTEM NOTURN
defaulthost = domain.com domain.com
linelength = 1023
channel env addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel hdr addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel official host = mta1.domain.com
channel after params =
channel user name =
urgentnotices = 1 2 4 7
normalnotices = 1 2 4 7
nonurgentnotices = 1 2 4 7
channel rightslist ids =
local behavior flags = %x7
expandchannel =
notificationchannel =
dispositionchannel =
saslswitchchannel =
tlsswitchchannel =
backward channel = l
unique identifier = [email protected]
header forward address = [email protected] (route (mta1.domain.com,mta1.domain.com)) (host domain.com)
header reverse address = [email protected]
envelope forw address = [email protected] (route (mta1.domain.com,mta1.domain.com)) (host domain.com)
envelope rev address = [email protected] (route (mta1.domain.com,mta1.domain.com)) (host domain.com)
name =
mbox = user
Extracted address action list:
[email protected]
Extracted 733 address action list:
[email protected]
Address list expansion:
*** Debug output from alias expansion:
09:49:06.70: Inner expand, level = 0, mailbox = [email protected]
09:49:06.70: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.70: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.70: Found: "$A$E$F$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.70: Match, pattern = "domain.com", current = "(*domaincheck*)"
09:49:06.70: old state = not checked.
09:49:06.70: Using result 1 from domain match cache.
09:49:06.70: new state = succeeded.
09:49:06.70: New mailbox: "user".
09:49:06.70: New host: "domain.com".
09:49:06.70: New route: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.70: New channel system: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.70: Looking up host "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.70: - found on channel l
09:49:06.70: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
09:49:06.70: Reparsed mailbox: user
09:49:06.70: Reparsed host: domain.com
09:49:06.70: Variant #1 = [email protected]
09:49:06.70: Variant #2 = *@domain.com
09:49:06.70: Alias magic value 8764
09:49:06.70: LDAP URL template identified
09:49:06.70: URL determined to be: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.com?*?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])([email protected]))
09:49:06.70: URL context #1 will be used
09:49:06.70: Performing URL search on: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.com?objectclass,inetuserstatus,mailuserstatus,inetMailGroupStatus,uid,preferredLanguage,mailRoutingAddress,mailMsgMaxBlocks,mail,mailAlternateAddress,mailEquivalentAddress,mailDeliveryOption,vacationStartDate,vacationEndDate,mailConversionTag,mailhost,mailQuota,mailMsgQuota,mailProgramDeliveryInfo,mailDeliveryFileURL,mailDeliveryFile,mailAutoReplyMode,mailAutoReplySubject,mailAutoReplyText,mailAutoReplyTextInternal,mailAutoReplyTimeOut,mailSieveRuleSource,mailForwardingAddress,mailDeferProcessing,mgrpMsgRejectAction,mgrpRejectText,mgrpMsgRejectText,mgrpBroadcasterPolicy,mgrpDisallowedBroadcaster,mgrpAllowedBroadcaster,mgrpDisallowedDomain,mgrpAllowedDomain,mgrpMsgMaxSize,mgrpAuthPassword,mgrpModerator,mgrpDeliverTo,memberURL,UniqueMember,mgrpRFC822MailMember,rfc822MailMember,mgrpErrorsTo,mgrpAddHeader,mgrpRemoveHeader,mgrpMsgPrefixText,mgrpMsgSuffixText,mgmanMemberVisibility,expandable?sub?(|([email protected])(mailAlternateAddress=user@09:49:06.72: Scanning LDAP result.
09:49:06.72: Attribute: objectclass
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 0
09:49:06.72: Attribute: inetuserstatus
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 1
09:49:06.72: Attribute: mailuserstatus
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 2
09:49:06.72: Attribute: uid
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 5
09:49:06.72: Attribute: preferredLanguage
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 19
09:49:06.72: Attribute: mail
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 31
09:49:06.72: Attribute: mailAlternateAddress
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 32
09:49:06.72: Attribute: mailDeliveryOption
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 34
09:49:06.72: Attribute: mailQuota
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 51
09:49:06.72: Attribute: mailAutoReplyMode
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 55
09:49:06.72: Attribute: mailForwardingAddress
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 64
09:49:06.72: Attribute: mailDeferProcessing
09:49:06.72: Attribute index: 65
09:49:06.72: Scanning complete, begin actions
09:49:06.72: Possible user object classes: inetLocalMailRecipient+inetmailuser
09:49:06.72: Possible group object classes: inetLocalMailRecipient+inetmailgroup
09:49:06.72: Object class: top
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: person
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: inetuser
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: organizationalperson
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: inetorgperson
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: ipuser
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: inetmailuser
09:49:06.72: Object class match, reference value 1
09:49:06.72: Object class: inetlocalmailrecipient
09:49:06.72: Object class match, reference value 18
09:49:06.72: Object class: userpresenceprofile
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: inetsubscriber
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: icscalendaruser
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: iplanet-am-managed-person
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: iplanet-am-user-service
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: iplanetpreferences
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: inetadmin
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: sunamauthaccountlockout
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: sunUCPreferences
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: Object class: mailDomain
09:49:06.72: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.72: User/group index = 1
09:49:06.72: Domain is active
09:49:06.72: Mail domain is active
09:49:06.72: User status = active
09:49:06.72: User is active
09:49:06.72: Mail user status = active
09:49:06.72: User is active
09:49:06.72: User UID user found.
09:49:06.73: Delivery option: mailbox
09:49:06.73: Delivery options value: 1
09:49:06.73: Processing mailhost attribute
09:49:06.73: Mailhost not set for user
09:49:06.73: Adding result to cache.
09:49:06.73: Status for this address = -10
09:49:06.73: LDAP URL template identified
09:49:06.73: URL determined to be: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.com?*?sub?([email protected])
09:49:06.73: URL context #1 will be used
09:49:06.73: Performing URL search on: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.com?objectclass,inetuserstatus,mailuserstatus,inetMailGroupStatus,uid,preferredLanguage,mailRoutingAddress,mailMsgMaxBlocks,mail,mailAlternateAddress,mailEquivalentAddress,mailDeliveryOption,vacationStartDate,vacationEndDate,mailConversionTag,mailhost,mailQuota,mailMsgQuota,mailProgramDeliveryInfo,mailDeliveryFileURL,mailDeliveryFile,mailAutoReplyMode,mailAutoReplySubject,mailAutoReplyText,mailAutoReplyTextInternal,mailAutoReplyTimeOut,mailSieveRuleSource,mailForwardingAddress,mailDeferProcessing,mgrpMsgRejectAction,mgrpRejectText,mgrpMsgRejectText,mgrpBroadcasterPolicy,mgrpDisallowedBroadcaster,mgrpAllowedBroadcaster,mgrpDisallowedDomain,mgrpAllowedDomain,mgrpMsgMaxSize,mgrpAuthPassword,mgrpModerator,mgrpDeliverTo,memberURL,UniqueMember,mgrpRFC822MailMember,rfc822MailMember,mgrpErrorsTo,mgrpAddHeader,mgrpRemoveHeader,mgrpMsgPrefixText,mgrpMsgSuffixText,mgmanMemberVisibility,expandable?sub?([email protected])
09:49:06.75: Search succeeded but 0 entries returned
09:49:06.75: No matching entries were found that were valid
09:49:06.75: Status for this address = 0
0 expansion total.
*** Debug output from submitting an envelope address:
09:49:06.75: mmc_wadr(0x08103050,'[email protected]','[email protected]') called.
09:49:06.75: Copy estimate before address addition is 1
09:49:06.75: Parsing address [email protected]
09:49:06.75: Rewriting: Mbox = "user", host = "domain.com", domain = "$*", literal = "", tag = ""
09:49:06.75: Rewrite: "$*", position 0, hash table -
09:49:06.75: Found: "$A$E$F$U%[email protected]"
09:49:06.75: Match, pattern = "domain.com", current = "(*domaincheck*)"
09:49:06.75: old state = not checked.
09:49:06.75: Using result 1 from domain match cache.
09:49:06.75: new state = succeeded.
09:49:06.75: New mailbox: "user".
09:49:06.75: New host: "domain.com".
09:49:06.75: New route: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.75: New channel system: "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.75: Looking up host "mta1.domain.com".
09:49:06.75: - found on channel l
09:49:06.75: Routelocal flag set; scanning for % and !
09:49:06.75: Address [email protected] requires local processing.
09:49:06.75: Variant #1 = [email protected]
09:49:06.75: Variant #2 = *@domain.com
09:49:06.75: Alias magic value 8764
09:49:06.75: Checking for [email protected] in the system alias file
09:49:06.75: - not found
09:49:06.75: Checking for *@domain.com in the system alias file
09:49:06.75: - not found
09:49:06.75: Checking [email protected] with URL template ldap:///$V?*?sub?$R
09:49:06.75: LDAP URL template identified
09:49:06.75: URL determined to be: ldap:///o%3Ddomain.com?*?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])([email protected]))
09:49:06.75: URL context #1 will be used
09:49:06.75: Using cached LDAP result for URL info: ldap:///$V?*?sub?$R|[email protected]|[email protected]
09:49:06.75: Scanning LDAP result.
09:49:06.75: Attribute: objectclass
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 0
09:49:06.75: Attribute: inetuserstatus
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 1
09:49:06.75: Attribute: mailuserstatus
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 2
09:49:06.75: Attribute: uid
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 5
09:49:06.75: Attribute: preferredLanguage
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 19
09:49:06.75: Attribute: mail
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 31
09:49:06.75: Attribute: mailAlternateAddress
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 32
09:49:06.75: Attribute: mailDeliveryOption
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 34
09:49:06.75: Attribute: mailQuota
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 51
09:49:06.75: Attribute: mailAutoReplyMode
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 55
09:49:06.75: Attribute: mailForwardingAddress
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 64
09:49:06.75: Attribute: mailDeferProcessing
09:49:06.75: Attribute index: 65
09:49:06.75: Scanning complete, begin actions
09:49:06.75: Possible user object classes: inetLocalMailRecipient+inetmailuser
09:49:06.75: Possible group object classes: inetLocalMailRecipient+inetmailgroup
09:49:06.75: Object class: top
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: person
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: inetuser
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: organizationalperson
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: inetorgperson
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: ipuser
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: inetmailuser
09:49:06.75: Object class match, reference value 1
09:49:06.75: Object class: inetlocalmailrecipient
09:49:06.75: Object class match, reference value 18
09:49:06.75: Object class: userpresenceprofile
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: inetsubscriber
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: icscalendaruser
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: iplanet-am-managed-person
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: iplanet-am-user-service
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: iplanetpreferences
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: inetadmin
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: sunamauthaccountlockout
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: sunUCPreferences
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: Object class: mailDomain
09:49:06.75: Object class didn't match
09:49:06.75: User/group index = 1
09:49:06.75: Domain is active
09:49:06.75: Mail domain is active
09:49:06.75: User status = active
09:49:06.75: User is active
09:49:06.75: Mail user status = active
09:49:06.75: User is active
09:49:06.75: User UID user found.
09:49:06.75: Delivery option: mailbox
09:49:06.75: Delivery options value: 1
09:49:06.75: Processing mailhost attribute
09:49:06.75: Mailhost not set for user
09:49:06.75: Status for this address = -10
09:49:06.75: Temporary alias URL failure; reprocess later
09:49:06.75: - adding address [email protected] to channel reprocess
09:49:06.75: Good address count 1 defer count 1
09:49:06.75: All addresses deferred - treat as general temporary error
09:49:06.75: Copy estimate after address addition is 2
09:49:06.75: mmc_waend(0x08103050) called.
09:49:06.75: Copy estimate is 2
09:49:06.75: Queue area size 145940970, temp area size 21837154
09:49:06.75: 36485242 blocks of effective free queue space available; setting disk limit accordingly.
09:49:06.75: 10918577 blocks of free temporary space available; setting disk limit accordingly.
Submitted address list:
Address list error -- 4.0.0 temporary error returned by alias expansion: [email protected]
Submitted notifications list:

Default cost center not appearing for certain users

Hi Gurus,
We are on SRM 4.0 classic scenario.
For certain users when they create SC in SRM the default cost center is not automatically taken into account even if they change it to it. The default cost center was changed for these users and some of them still refer to the old cost center no. which was maintained for them.
The users are not defective and the except the cost center all other attributes work fine. I have tested by deleting & recreating new BP no. for the users but it still doesnt help. Please advise.
BR,
Sambit

hi
check if the users are correctly mapped into org structure (ppoma_bbp)
than check if theri Position are correctly mapped with the default cost center (ppoma_bbp; tab attributes; cost center
regards
andrea

Possible to make an item editable for certain users and read only for other

Is it possible to make an item editable for certain users and read only for others?
I've been able to accomplish this by taken the select statement that I used to define an authorization scheme, placing it in the Read Only condition of the item. However, I would like to simply reference the authorization scheme to utilize caching, and to help keep things cleaner for future maintenance.
Is it possible to reference an authorization scheme in an item condition similar to the way another item can be referenced by preceding it with a colon (i.e. :P1_First_Name)?

Thank you, your suggestion worked.
It would be nice on a future release of APEX if a drop-down box existed under the Ready Only section that would allow an existing Authorization Scheme to be selected or negated when applying the Read Only attribute to a form item.

Can OneDrive for Business be disabled for certain users?

Is it possible to disable OneDrive for Business for certain users? If so, how? Thanks.

you can remove the OneDrive for Business client for the certain users from their computers so that they cannot use it.
http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/156/t/192252.aspx
http://www.askvg.com/what-is-skydrive-pro-option-and-how-to-remove-it-from-context-menu-after-installing-microsoft-office-2013/
My Blog- http://www.sharepoint-journey.com|
If a post answers your question, please click Mark As Answer on that post and Vote as Helpful

Restricting User defined Field for certain user

Hi experts
I have a field name U_JobNumber at header level of Item Master Data. Can we make visible for certain user ?
Is this possible .
Thank you in advance
Bishal

Hi Bishal,
There is a standard feature in SBO that allows you to enable and set the visibility of UDFs. This works on a user/company level. To do this, log in as the user, open the Item Master form and make sure that the UDF tabs is showing then choose Tools-Customisation Tools--Settings from the top menu. You'll then see a separate window that allows you to set the visibility or any UDFs on this form.
I don't think this feature is currently exposed via the DI API or UI API so you'd need to set these manually.
Kind Regards,
Owen

Password protect/disable printers for certain users under ML 10.8

I am looking for a solution to prevent my youger pupils to print everything without asking me. Is there a solution to protect/disable printers for certain users under ML 10.8 ?

Ok. The sharing interface is not robust enough (by itself) to password challenge print jobs. You may need to look at another printing technology known as CUPS. Apple created this for advanced print configuration, and it does offer Kerberos security with printing password challenges. I do not know if OS X server offers more granularity in configuration.
I won't be able to help you with the following as I do not use the CUPS printing solution here.
In Safari, type in the following and press return.
localhost:631
You will see a tabbed browser interface. And a bit of light reading ...

Blocking Status Tab strip in VA02 for Certain users

Hi,
I have to block the status tab strip for certain users in VA02 tcode .
this tab strip is shown when user double cick the line item.points will be rewarded
Thanks and regards
Prakash B.

Hi,
you can use in MV45AFZZ the PERFORM USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION.
You can set the desired screen fields to inactive.
Rgds,
JP

Disabling cprojects alerts for certain users only

Hi
I need that no email alerts are sent to certain roles/people who have authorizations in cprojects. There are numerous alerts sent as email for any change of dates, thresholds etc. I need to disbale any email being sent in this for certain users.
How can it be done?
Regards
Senthil

Hi Senthil,
Would you please check the following
Evaluations -> Business Add-Ins (BAdIs) -> Change Alerts from Severities in cProjects
related method is CHANGE_ALERTS_OF_PROJECT, which has a change parameter:
CT_LANGUAGE_OF_RECIPIENT. You can apply your own logic to remove some recipient of the table, so that they do not get the e-mail.
Never tested, please check it out.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Organizational Management Plan Version Lock

While planning personell costs we use several plan versions in addition to our active version 01. We would like to block or lock access to the plan versions once our budget is complete. Does anyone have any ideas on locking OM versions?
Thanks for the help,
Eric

Hi Eric,
I think it is not possible to lock the plan version but work around might be to create two separate authorisation roles. One with PLOG authorisation objects to your plan version with all relevant change function codes INSE, DEL, AEND etc and then another role with only DISP and LISD for the same plan version. When the plan version should be locked role to change could be removed and display role assigned.
Maybe bit more maintenance than just flicking a switch but should work if there is no other solution.
Regards,
Saku

How to block on account payment for certain user

Dear All,
   We are looking to implement a policy on how to block certain users not to be able to take on account payment. One more query is it possible to disable a field. I want to disable the field "Payment on account" in the Incoming Payments. Please advice

Hi,
Sue below code in transaction notification procedure,Change userid =1 to user id for user ou want to block payment on account
IF @Object_type = N'24' and @transaction_type = N'A'
BEGIN
if exists (SELECT    ORCT.DocEntry from ORCT
                     WHERE (ORCT.PayNoDoc='Y' and ORCT.UserSign=1) and ORCT.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del
begin
        select @error =14
   select @error_message = 'Cannot make on account payments '
end
END
Thanks,
Neetu

Tabular Form - Read only condition for certain users

Is it possible to make a select list field in a tabular form read-only to certain users? Here's the situation:
The tabular form lists the users who need to select "Approve" or "Reject" in that field (they are approving or rejecting an engineering change)
I want all of them to see the approval/rejection of their team, but only have access to edit the select list associated with their record.
Thanks in advance.
Apex 4.0.0.00.46

You could use either "authorisations" tab or "conditional display" for the relevant column attribute.
Report Attributes->Column Attributes->authorisationsIt would be better to have some more detail about what you are trying to get (maybe a quick mock up of the form, for example) but, I can envision something along the lines of the following:
For each approval/rejection field:
1. Create an authorisation appropriate for access to to each approval/rejection field e.g. authorisation scheme "FOO"
2. In the relevant fields column attributes, set the authorisation to "FOO"
3. now create a read only "public" copy of the above field, using the "display as text (based on LOV does not save state)" - set the authorisation for this field as "{NOT FOO}"
(if you don't want to use authorisations, you could build an equivalent using "conditional display" instead, which is basically the same thing, except column specific)
The downside is of course that you're duplicating fields in your query, which creates a bit of redundancy. There may be better ways to achieve this (maybe you could make use of the APEX_ITEM api, for example) but this is fairly easy to set up IMO.

BI 7.0 version report for anonymous user

Dear Gurus,
Greetings for the day!
I want to display the BEX BI 7.0 version report on Portal 7.0 for anonymous user. But I am not able to do the same. Can somebody please help me to achieve my task. Thanks.
Regards,
P.Swarna

HI,
Thanks for your reply,
Its already configured and the reports working perfectly with login user ids( like end user).But when we assign same report
to anonymous user with authentication scheme = anonymous in iview properties still its redirecting to logon page.
Please suggest how to configure BI 7.0 report for anonymous users.
Regards,
P.Swarna

Distiller crashes for certain user

Distiller 6.02 runniing on 10.4.7 on dual G5.
Distiller will not work for a certain user. Files appear to distil correctly but the PDFs never appear in the destination folder.
When this problem occurs there are no error messages, but Distiller freezes (and must be force-quit) the next time anything is clicked.
For the Admin user (or any other user on this machine) Distiller behaves OK.
I've tried:
• deleting user prefs
• deleteing user caches
• deleting user adobe font lists
• logging user in with no startup items
• updating Distiller
• rebuilding permissions
etc.
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks,
b.

Another possibility is that you've acquired a bad font, that's crashing the font handling subsystems.
Finding this can be a matter of going through the fonts in the Windows\Fonts folder and systematically removing them until Photoshop works again. Sometimes you can just activate the Type tool and expand the Font list, looking for an abrupt end to the list or faulty appearance of a font.
I imagine Adobe would be very interested to hear what specific font can crash their software like this when you find it.
-Noel

ATP in SD. Advantage of ATP server & locks for multiple users.

hi,
I am working on ATP in SD. We have to design our own ATP calculation logic.
1. What is advantage of ATP server (logical partition) in SD. does it helps in regulating the calls for ATP calculation.
2. In standard there is lock for plant & material combination i.e. Material block with quantity transfer. but here i want blocking to be done on the level material-storage location including one more entity called paper machine which is specific in this ATP calculation.

Hello Rishi,
It is quite possible to connect more than one SCM system to ECC technically. Business case will be little specific to customer requirements i.e having existing SCM systems for different business units.
GATP check can be carried out in different SCM system as you rightly mentioned based on CIF integration model. It doesn't create any issue. We have similar system set-up for internal use.
Only issue what I see here is, in case of RBATP, if you are using cross location ATP check, if will not give you desired results. Second issue will be for planned supply components, if material is planned in separate SCM system.
Such system set-up works fine when you are having isolated materials and location to plan and GATP.
Regards,
Dinesh Goyal

Plan version locked for certain users

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for