Planed Cost value for order
Hi gurus,
I'm just a beginner at this SAP module, so I would be very grateful for your help...
When I first create a maintenance order through transaction IW31, and go to Costs tab, i wonder how Co/area Curr value is calculated, because it doesnt' seem to take it from Tcurr table since the currency change is different from the one is used in this tab.... i hope u can help me with this doubt....
Thanks a Lot,
Daniel Siñani
Hi,
Please check the your setting in customising for below path
Plant Maintenance and Customer Service>>Maintenance and Service Processing>Functions and Settings for Order Types-->Costing Data for Maintenance- and Service Orders
1)Maintain Costing Sheet
2)Maintain Costing Variants
3)Define Valuation Variants
4)Assign Costing Parameters and Results Analysis Keys
Regards,
Rakesh
Edited by: RAKESH ASHOK MANE on May 12, 2009 7:06 AM
Similar Messages
-
Can anybody tell me how to extract sales value and cost value for an materi
dear all,
Can anybody tell me how to extract sales value and cost value for an material sold .
All the values of cost value and sale values are getting stored in bseg-wrbtr field .
How to identify them uniquely.
Or there is another way to find the sale and cost values.
Regards
MaveHi Mave!
Normally there is no condition change, when something is sold.
But sales price depends on sales conditions (not only price, but also surcharges, discounts, taxes - if customized).
Nevertheless, after selling you have a invoice document, where correct values <i>should</i> be stored (see VBRP fields mentioned above). If here is a problem, then customizing of price determination is in question, not a programming of user-exits with MARD selection for costs (or some other tries to get a price).
When you specify your requirements more in detail, you might get better answers - but currently only general hints are possible ('see in invioce / G/L accounts').
Regards,
Christian -
Can we see costing value for line item batch in Batch Information Cokcpit r
Can we see costing value for line item batch in Batch Information Cokcpit report - BMBC?
Business like to see standard cost/ item and extended cost which should be qty in inventory * standard cost.
Help appreciated.
Edited by: Tom_Eric on Jan 13, 2012 2:33 AMHI.
YES it is passible.
If the GL is activated line item display check box is active then we can able to see the data as per line items.
T<Code. Fbl5n
Thanks.
Vasu
Edited by: Vasu Enaguthi on Apr 7, 2010 8:46 AM -
Default Value for Order Type based on Company Code in ME21N
Hi,
Using ME21N, I want to make the PO type defaulted to a certain company code, say for instance Company code XYZ should have a PO type XYZ Purchase Order, ..company ABC should have a PO type ABC Purchase Order, and so on...I'm just puzzled how to implement it. I know that we can set a Default value for PO Headers in Personal Settings but its doesnt give the result I want coz it will only have one Default Value. What I wanted is when a certain company code is chosen, automatically, the corresponding PO type for that Company code will be displayed in the Order Type drop-down menu (so there's no need to choose on the drop down list what Order type) Is this possible in ABAP? Hope i made myself clear.
Thanks in Advance.Use BADI IF IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST - method OPEN
View the interface documentation in transaction SE19 and you will see the method OPEN can be used :
2. Opening of a purchase order (OPEN method)
The system opens a new document to create, change or display a purchase order. With the OPEN method,
<b>you can import your own data and prepare it for further processing.</b>
This is available in 4.7 Enterprise but not sure how far back.....
hope this helps
Colin. -
Different Cost values for full table scans
I have a very simple query that I run in two environments (Prod (20 CPU) and Dev (12 CPU)). Both environemtns are HPUX, oracle 9i.
The query looks like this:
SELECT prd70.jde_item_n
FROM gdw.vjda_gdwprd68_bom_cmpnt prd68
,gdw.vjda_gdwprd70_gallo_item prd70
WHERE prd70.jde_item_n = prd68.parnt_jde_item_n
AND prd68.last_eff_t+nvl(to_number(prd70.auto_hld_dy_n),0)>= trunc(sysdate)
GROUP BY prd70.jde_item_n
When I look at the explain plans, there is a significant difference in cost and I can't figure out why they would be different. Both queries do full table scans, both instances have about the same number of rows, statistics on both are fresh.
Production Plan:
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=18398 Card=14657 B
ytes=249169)
1 0 SORT (GROUP BY) (Cost=18398 Card=14657 Bytes=249169)
2 1 HASH JOIN (Cost=18304 Card=14657 Bytes=249169)
3 2 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'GDWPRD70_GALLO_ITEM' (Cost=949
4 Card=194733 Bytes=1168398)
4 2 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'GDWPRD68_BOM_CMPNT' (Cost=5887
Card=293149 Bytes=3224639)
Development plan:
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=3566 Card=14754 B
ytes=259214)
1 0 HASH GROUP BY (GROUP BY) (Cost=3566 Card=14754 Bytes=259214)
2 1 HASH JOIN (Cost=3558 Card=14754 Bytes=259214)
3 2 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'GDWPRD70_GALLO_ITEM' (Cost=1914
4 Card=193655 Bytes=1323598)
4 2 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'GDWPRD68_BOM_CMPNT' (Cost=1076
Card=295075 Bytes=3169542)
There seems to be no reason for the costs to be so different, but I'm hoping that someone will be able to lead me in the right direction.
Thanks,
JdelaoThis link may help:
http://jaffardba.blogspot.com/2007/07/change-behavior-of-group-by-clause-in.html
But looking at the explain plans one of them uses a SORT (GROUP BY) (higher cost query) and the other uses a HASH GROUP BY (GROUP BY) (lower cost query). From my searches on the `Net the HASH GROUP BY is a more efficient algorithm than the SORT (GROUP BY) which would lead me to believe that this is one of the reasons why the cost values are so different. I can't find which version HASH GROUP BY came in but quick searches indicate 10g for some reason.
Are your optimizer features parameter set to the same value? In general you could compare relevant parameters to see if there is a difference.
Hope this helps! -
Cost value for third party sales order scenario
Greetings, I have a cost question involving the Third Party Sales Order (Item category TAS).
At billing (VF01), the cost being picked up by the system are the value from the PO (PBXX condition type). I would like the system to pick up the entire COGS value (inclusive of freight values) posted at MIGO.
Ex. If Purchase price is 100 and freight is 20, I want 120 (the COGS value) to be shown in the cost field. It currently shows 100.
The steps I follow are
1) Create OR sales order (item category TAS)
2) Create PO referencing PR
3) Goods Receipt D 120 COGS/ C 100 GRIR /C 20 freight
4) Outbound Delivery (Confirmation only)
5) Billing (Costs showing 100?!)
Again, only the PBXX condition type value (From MM Calculation Schema) is being picked up.
How can I get the system to pick up the freight value as well?
Regards
KenHi,
If you bring the Freight condition after PBXX and include in the net value, your problem will be solved. so it will be 120 in MIGO, MIRO, Dellivery and VPRS in billing.
We have the same situation and its working fine for us.
Thanks
Krishna. -
Tabale for Actual cost value for Process orders
Hi Friends
From which table can we retrive the actual values relates to process orderwise, like actual material consumption cost, activites cost, overhead cost and other costs.Hi
You would find the actual for process orders in Table COEP with Object Number = OP*. Also Check if you would require COSS, COSP for Controlling Tables and to get the Object numbers you need to used AFPO with Order type of Process order PI01...
Regards,
Suraj -
Planned cost/ value for CJ40 tcode
Hi
We have a requirement where we need to find out the Planned Costs booked against a WBS element, in a year. The costs can be against all the plan versions or on individual plan version.How to find total object-numbesr for a WBS element
Regards
Ravi.Hi Swastik,
Those cost elements (category 31) are used to calculate and store WIP values at the detailed level of so called line IDs.
Line IDs are groups of cost elements that were posted to production order.
For example you can calculate and store WIP separately for Raw Materials, Semis, Activities and overhead.
You can also settle them to different GL Accounts via mapping in txn.OKG8.
Hope it helps,
Szymon -
Rounding value for PR Quantity
Dear Expert,
Can we have rounding value for order quantity in Purchase Requisition? So we do not need to calculate the PO quantity based on the rounding value we have determined in material master / get the error message "Order quantity violates rounding rules while we creating the Purchase order.
And What is rounding profile? can we use this to set the rounding value for PR quantity?
Hope to see ur feedback soon.
Thanks
PaulineHi Dick Hua,
Thanks for your feedback.
i understand what you are trying to explain to me , can we do some changes / customizing from your statement, so that the manually created PR can have effect on rounding value, same as when we run the MRP.
Can you tell me What is rounding profile used for? can I used rounding profile to solve my customizing?
Thanks
Pauline -
Hide cost value in documents.
Dear everybody,
Someone knows, if there is some choice to hide the value in the field cost. I dont know if I am wrong, but I heard its possible marke that value with asterisks to protect it.
I was trying in general authorizations but the value is always visible.
Thanks a lot.
Daniel.Thanks a lot Gordon,
This recomendation is to do it in every document, for example I should do it in the item master data and to all of every marketing documents too and after I have to make an Aditional Authorizations creator to the form settings? If I am wrong thanks for your future information.
Is there other choice to do this topic general in the way to protect the cost value for all the users and documents.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Daniel -
TCode for calculating cost by sales order number - EK02 condition value
In our case we have order item based cost. For each order item we push the calculator button and calculate the cost. The system adds the EK02 condition by this way. But is there a transaction code where we enter the sales order number and the system calculates the cost and adds the EK02 condition?
Hi,
T-code is KVBI and or explore sales order costing
SAP Menu >> SD >> Sales >> Product cost by sales order
Kapil -
Function module expression for dynamic value for Cost center in BRF
Hello Experts,
We are in SRM 7.0 and our business object is shopping cart using BRF.
Right now we have Cost Center Approver and its evaluation id ()zev_sc_**_*) has expression zc_sc_*_** that checks whether overallvalue >= 5000. It initiates cost center approver only if value is greater than or equal to 5000. But this is static expression. We want it in a dynamic way so that we don't have to modify this value frequently. Therefore we have set approach to use an expression of Function Module BAdI as expression. We have a new z table which contains value field zval. Now I want to know how or what should be the process so that this FM knows the corresponding value from a z table that user might select in the SC.How it should be linked to this. I am using /SAPSRM/WF_BRF_0EXP000 function module. Please advise where should the code be written ? Any method ? And what should be the exporting and importing parameters for this ?
Right now I can see EV_VALUE, EV_TYPE, EV_CURRENCY etc as exporting paramters. Looking for your suggestions experts.
Thank you.
Best regards.Dear abhijeet,
just follow the steps.
i) I believe you have created the event as Zev_*** with implememt Class 0EVENT.
ii) copy the std fm /SAPSRM/WF_BRF_0EXP000 to z custom fm
iii) since you want to have an expression as function module procurement type create expression with
expression type 0CF001
result type B ( boolean)
Buffering as event-controlled buffering
and very important procurement type as function module.
iv) immediatly you may find written as AccessFM where pass your custom z function module.
v) finally link this expression to your event.
In the custom function module the exporting parameter EV_VALUE is solely responsible for identifieng the approval based upon the approval criteria. If the field EV_VALUE = 'X' this notify that the approval is required for current process level, otherwise if it is initial then it will skip the current level and continue with the next level.
whatever your coding should be written in FM.
just look into below code
DATA LO_WF_BRF_EVENT TYPE REF TO /SAPSRM/CL_WF_BRF_EVENT.
DATA LO_CONTEXT_PROVIDER TYPE REF TO /SAPSRM/IF_WF_CONTEXT_PROVIDER.
DATA: LV_HEADER LIKE BBP_PDS_SC_HEADER_D.
DATA: LT_ITEM TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF BBP_PDS_SC_ITEM_D.
LO_WF_BRF_EVENT ?= IO_EVENT.
LO_CONTEXT_PROVIDER = LO_WF_BRF_EVENT->GET_CONTEXT_PROVIDER( ).
CALL METHOD LO_CONTEXT_PROVIDER->GET_DOCUMENT
IMPORTING
EV_DOCUMENT_GUID = LV_DOCUMENT_GUID
EV_DOCUMENT_TYPE = LV_DOCUMENT_TYPE.
pass this guid in the below function module in order to get the SC details.
GET SC DETAILS
CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_SC_GETDETAIL'
EXPORTING
I_GUID = LV_DOCUMENT_GUID
IMPORTING
E_HEADER = LV_HEADER
TABLES
E_ITEM = LT_ITEM
After that loop the internal table LT__ITEM and you decide based upon your approval criteria for each line item level wheather the gross price of line item is exceed 5000k or not.
you should decide the value for field EV_VALUE within the loop so that each line item will be verified for approval.
Pls contribute if this helpfull.
regards
sahil purushan -
Reduce Remaining Order Planned value for services with PO
Hi guys,
I'am looking for a way to reduce the remaining or residual order plan value for a network activity with services where the amount on the PO is below the planned value. If for example the planned value amounts up to 1000 and the PO has been reduced due to negotiations to 900, a remainder order plan of 100 remains on the network activity till the activity is technically closed.
Is there a way to reduce the ROP when a PO exists for the network activity?
Thanks, GeertWe are combining an early visibility of all costs and a strict budget availability control with a formal procedure for project managers to request additional budget.
We have more and more projects where a part of the budget remains blocked in ROP for service activities because the planned value was more pessimistic than the real PO amount. Since these service activities are typically executed at the end of the project that part remains blocked. Of course the project managers want to use that marging elsewhere without having to pass a request for additional budget.
We have no issue with the network activity planned costs remaining visible, we just want the ROP to be 0 when a the purchase requisition for the service activity has been transformed into a purchase order. In the above example 100 of the budget would be freed for other use. -
There are values for cost element 80000 that are not assigned to any line I
Hi,
While calulating WIP I am getting below error:
There are values for cost element 80000 that are not assigned to any line ID
Message no. KJ161
Diagnosis
Not all values for the cost element are assigned to a line ID.
Procedure
Assign the cost element to a line ID. If you don't want to include the cost element in results analysis, assign it to a line ID of category N.
You can access a detailed list of unassigned cost elements as follows: Start results analysis in the individual processing mode (transaction KKA1, KKA2, or KKA3). Select the field Full log. Execute the function. On the next screen, choose Logs -> Parameter List in the menu. A list is generated. The unassigned values are shown at the end of the list.
If cost element "+++++++++" was shown in the message, this is because in the assignment of costs and revenues to line IDs, you have not used a cost element other than the full masking "+++++++++". In this case a presummarization eliminates the information on the cost element.
Cost Element 80000 is of type 43 Internal activity allocation, I have Masked this in OKGB as below:
Controlling Area = FLGP
RA Version = 0
Masked Cost Element = 000008++++
Masked Cost Center = ++++++++++
Masked Activity Type = +++++
ReqToCap= COS (Secondary Cost)
I have Configure OKGA also but still system is giving error.
Please help me to understand.
Regards,
VivekI was wondering if you could help me I am trying to configure the RA key for Refurb orders and when I go into txn OKGB for the Assignment of C/E for WIP there is sample config already there which I copied. But I am having difficulty getting the KK1A to work I am getting the message as outlined above. Could you explain how this OKGB works and how to configure it a bit more fully. In my sample config there is a ReqTOCap section and in it there are letters like ABR, EK, FK, EL what do they mean. This is a screen shot of it. I am not sure how to go about this entirely so any light you could shed would be greatly appreciated. Can you suggest a good resource or documentation you may have, would be greatly appreciated.
-
Report for extracting the actual and planned cost from service orders
HI all
we are creating a report in BI for Module - Customer service . LIke , the report is all about how many complaints created in the system and how many completed technically and what is the cost involved for each complaint .
Like we want the comparision between the planned cost and the actual cost .
Now to give the logic to the BI Team for planned cost and actual cost , please suggest the flow of logic or table flow to arrive the planned and actual cost
thanks in advanceHi Marthand,
I am not sure which datasource your are using. In this case, you can use the 0VALUETYPE to differencitae between th eplan and actuals. Normally Plan which is budget will have value 050 and for actuals will have 010. For costs, you will have one key figure and at the reporting level, you will have the costs restricted by the value type for plan and actual to make comparisons.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Srinivas
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am getting a red flag on any email I enter when trying to submit a message. The same email address works on my iPhone.
-
Hi, I wonder if anyone runs across this kind of error? Thanks, Sep 2, 2005 8:03:08 AM oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.style.util.GraphicsUtils$GraphicsLoader run WARNING: The following exception was thrown while initialiazing the graphics environment:
-
N97 - How to Get Perfeckt GPS Reception
Get perfect GPS-operation in your car with this simple modification that will not void warranty: First find some metal tape. Cupper or aluminium. Put two 120 mm pieces of tape together, glue to glue, but leave 20 mm at one end. Let the protecting pa
-
Hello, I am having a little trouble getting the autosuggest to work. No errors come up in firebug but I get no suggestions displaying. My code on the browser is: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" " http://www.w3.org/TR/xh
-
I just boot camp my macbook white unibody to windows 7 but I can't setup my wifi plz help!
I just boot camp my macbook white to windows 7 home premium. Used to run on windows XP(no problem with the wifi) Plz help~~