Planning member combination for Webform

Hi
we have an On save BR (having complex calculations) which runs for more than 1 Hour. I have tried running the BR from EAS console for a single combination (Row and Column dimension members from webform) of data inputted via webform, BR runs for less than 10 minutes.
Is there any way we can identify the member combination for which the data is inputted in webform and pass the members as runtime prompts to the BR?
Thanks
Sethu

There isn't a feature which does what you want. I would assume that the BR is running on the whole dimension hierarchies (all Product for example).
However you could use adjust the form layout to use Global Variables which act as Run Time Prompts, which can be hidden on the form - although this would only work if there was one member from that dimension, for example this wouldn't work on the products member if you had a list of products in the row, however if you had products dimension in the page drop down this would work.
Check out the Understanding Runtime Prompts section in the Planning Admin guide:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/nav/portal_5.htm
Cheers, Iain

Similar Messages

  • How to enforce valid member combinations in Planning?

    Hi,
    Is it possible to enforce which combinations of members are valid in a Planning application? In Planning, each data cell represents the intersection of a member from each dimension. However, it is likely that not every combination of members is valid. For example, perhaps the combination of an Entity dimension member (like North Region) and an Account dimension member (like Salaries) should never exist because the North Region shoud not have data for Salaries. Is there a way to prevent data entry into the intersection of the North Region entity and Salaries account? Is there a way to define cross-dimension combination rules to prevent entry into cells that are defined to be invalid?
    I currently have a Planning application that takes Actual data from another system, and the data coming from this system has defined member combinations that are allowed and not allowed. Is there a way I can define these same validation rules in the Planning application to maintain integrity and make sure that "impossible" combinations of data are not input into Planning? Thank you.

    I am sorry to say that there is no way through Planning security to enforce combinations of members.
    It's the nature of the OLAP beast below Planning's cover -- Essbase.
    You can use security to restrict access to individual members, but cannot state "This Entity by these three Accounts only". What you can do is try to set up your forms so that this sort of metadata relationship shows up on the form -- attribute dimensions are often used to try to do this. It is an imperfect solution.
    Regards,
    Cameron Lackpour

  • Data not exist for member combination in web analysis report

    When I run the report in web analysis studio iam able to find the data for a particular member combination.When I try to run the same report in workspace iam not finding any data for same member combination.Can U please help me to resolve this issue

    Hi Swetha,
    You must've realized that- Even if you select only the desired members, you end up being able to drill-down unwanted members. Correct ? :)
    The only way, I believe, is- To create a users' group at your Data source side, perhaps, Essbase & provision this new group with a Metaread filter which prevents him/her from Drilling down to the leaf node.
    PS: Giving Read access might also let the user not see the data for children. But, if you want to hide the members also, Metaread+ is the way to go.

  • Valid Combinations for DImension Members

    Hi All,
    We have dimensions for Cost Center and Company code in one of our BPC Applications..Is there a way we can avoid users planning for incorrect combinations?
    E.g. -
    Valid Combinations  -
    Cost Center 1 >>>Company Code 1000
    Cost Center 2 >>>Company Code 2000
    In case the user selects Cost Center 1 & Company code 2000 in current view and enters plan values - the system should not allow the same...Is there a way to maintain valid combinations for dimension members (belonging to different dimensions) in BPC???

    Hi Shibu,
    It was just an example, to show you how to control the combinations. You might have to design it based on the exact business requirement.
    Please note that this wont be a straight-forward process, and you might have to use some VB macros to ensure you get, what you require.
    Lets say, based on the expansion, you have 5 company codes to be displayed in the template. You should, first, use an EVEXP function to list all the 5 company codes in some empty region of the template. Use a macro to concatenate all the 5 company codes separated by "|". Then, for the expansion on cost centers, you should again use a macro which will consider each of the 5 company codes at a time, and set the expansion to "P_COMPANY = ABC". Since you have 5 company codes, hence you will have 5 such combinations of member filter pertaining to each of the 5 company codes. Then you must concatenate them using "|", and this should be the memberset option for the cost center dimension.
    I understand that this is going to be a bit complex, but I dont see any other option.
    Hope this helps.

  • How to delete Hyperion Planning member using ODI

    Hi All,
    Anyone know how to delete Hyperion Planning member using ODI? And how to update account type on Hyperion Planning Using ODI?
    e.g.:
    I have a member with account type Saved Assumption, and I need to change to Revenue, but it cannot change. But if I change to Expense, it can. So what's wrong with the mapping?
    This is my csv file for update a member on Hyperion Planning.
    Parent,Account,Default Alias,Operation,Data Storage,Two Pass Calculation,Account Type,Time Balance,Skip Value,Data Type,Exchange Rate Type,Use 445,Variance Reporting,Source Plan Type,Aggregation,Member Formula
    Account,Statistics,,Update,,,,,,,,,,,,
    Account,Meal,,Update,Store,,Expense,,,,,,,,,
    Account,Test1,,Update,Never Share,,Saved Assumption,Average,None,Non-currency,none,,,Consol,~,
    Account,Test2,,Update,Never Share,,Revenue,Average,None,Non-currency,none,,,Consol,~,
    Account,Test3,,Update,Never Share,,Saved Assumption,Average,None,Non-currency,none,,,Consol,~,
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sumardi
    Edited by: Sumardi Wijaya on Mar 31, 2009 10:57 PM

    Hi,
    To delete a member you use the Operation column, the following values can be used.
    Update – This is the default and is used if not populated, it Add, updates, moves the member being loaded.
    Delete Level 0 - Deletes the member being loaded if it has no children
    Delete Idescendants –Deletes the member being loaded and all of its descendants.
    Delete Descendants –Deletes the descendants of the member being loaded, but does not delete the member itself.
    Does the member you trying to change to Revenue have a variance reporting set to "Expense" as it will need to be set to "Non Expense"
    Also in your interface you can add logging options in the IKM, this maybe will give a clearer indication where your problem lies.
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • ERROR: Member required for alias *********** (3311)

    I'm getting a combination of errors when trying to do a dimension build and I'm not quite sure what it is I'm doing wrong. I added a few new columns to a rules file, 2 of which are alias dimensions, and when I do the build it throws a pile of these three errors:
    \\Record #1 - Incorrect Dimension (Retail Region/Area) For Member Tokyo (3308)
    \\Record #4 - Child Member Nagoya with no parent (3331)
    \\Record #4 - Member required for alias Nagoya:Shinya Kawabata (3311)
    I'm pretty sure I set up the rules file correctly, it looks like so:
    GEN1,Retail Region/Area | GEN2,Retail Region/Area | ALIAS2,Retail Region/Area | GEN3,Retail Region/Area | ALIAS3,Retail Region/Area
    Any ideas? Did I leave anything out?

    Thank you, I fixed the first one by simply changing the GEN2,Geographical dimension name to Tokyo2. Nice work! And I'm still working on the others, the SQL database is riddled with empty spaces and null values. And some of them I can't change because it pulls the empty space into the view from another view so I have to track down where the origin of the empty field is. I imagine if I fill up the database with useful information it'll solve my issue but if you're on the forums again later, please take a look at this thread to see if I'm pulling my hair out for any reason! I appreciate your help, thanks GlennS.

  • Installation/Work center/Plan number combination

    Hi,
    How/Where  to view the work orders for given Installation/Work center/Plan number combination? What is the transaction for this?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jegashree

    Hi Not sure aout installation, but by work cneter and plant  you can chck report COOIS for production orders.

  • Different inspection point field combination for each operation ?

    Hi
    I see that i can choose inspection point user field combination in the inspection plan header.
    But what i need is to define different combinations for each operation,
    Is this possible?
    If not do u have any other suggestions?
    Thanks,
    Alper,

    Dear Alper,
    I just meant in config .SPRO > Quality Management > Quality Planning >Inspection Planning >Define Identifier for Inspection Points
    you can make use of all the identification field for your purpose ( Text length 18, text length 10, Number length 10, number length 3 )
    operation wise what is needed to enter you make use of it
    Only a suggestion
    Regards
    gajesh

  • Deleted CVC's combination for product

    Hi experts,
    My User has deleted the CVC's combination for one product in APO. He is asking me load the deleted  data by tracing in ECC.How can we trace out the Product Hierarchy in ECC for the Product. Please help me.
    Thanks,
    Manasa

    Hi Manasa,
    Assuming that the user has deleted the CVCs only in the planning area, I have the following possible options:
    1) Do you take backup of data from planning area? If yes, go to the backup cube, and you can find all the CVCs correspodning to the product. Create CVCs using the backup cube. Then load the data from the backup cube to the planning area (by using this material as selection criteria). Most likely you would be able to recover all the lost CVCs/Key Figures in this way (Depends on what kind of backup you take).
    2) If you are not taking a backup (I would be very surprsied if this is the case), your task might not be easy. Talk to your BW team. They would be either sending the history data relevant for creation of CVC, or they might also be extracting data from DP planning area for reporting purpose. Either ways, it might be easy to identify the CVCs based on data available in BW system.
    Next would come the issue of how to get the Key Figures data against the CVCs. It could be simple or complex depending on your design. I can't directly comment. May be you can get history data easily from BW, and then run the DP jobs in APO to do the relevant calculation, or otherwise wait for the already scheduled DP jobs to run and they would take care of DP related calculations. Be very careful about this part - you would need to understand your DP flow properly before taking any actions.
    3) You could try to identify the missing CVCs in R/3 by understanding what all characteristics you use in DP, and how you derive them during creation of CVC.  Again you could try to identify how you would get the Key Figures against the CVCs from R/3 to APO. Again, my guess is that these calculations should mostly happen in BW, so above option no. 2 should hold good, but depends on your design. If you are not using BW to get data for DP, your situation could be very tricky.
    PS: If backup is taken (option 1), that is the simplest and straight forward option for you, go for it. Otherwise, best of luck.
    Thanks - Pawan

  • New plan(s) bad for me ?

    The new share everything plans are offering less service for more of my money.  Below are my currents costs & services vs what the new plan.
    I have a total of 4 lines, (2) smart phones and (2) basic phones which cost's $180/mo. on my current/old plan.
    - $80 per month for talk/txt (700 min / unlimited txt).
    - $10 per month for each basic phone (no data)
    - $40 per month for each smart phone (unlimited data)
                                    -vs-
    The new share everything plan will cost me $220/mo.  That's $40 more per month than my current plan.
    - $80 per month for the unlimited txt/call & 6GB package (This based on average data usage of 3Gb/mo of data use on each smart phone)
    - $30 per month for each basic phone
    - $40 per month for each smart phone
    The only advantage of upgrading to the new plan would be for subsidized phone pricing, in which case would cost me nothing since I would likely choose the no-cost phones.  In the end this is going to cost me an extra $40/mo. for a 24 month contract wich totals $960.  Another option:  Instead of giving $960 to verizon, I could use that to purchase used or new phones (as needed) from some place other than verizon, and keep my current/old plan.
    These phone plan prices are getting crazy, which is leading me to think seriously of other alternatives.
    One that keeps coming to mind is eliminating verizon and getting prepaid phones with pay as you go minutes.  The idea is to use them as PHONES and nothing else.  This would save me a bundle of money.  I'm thinking of vacations, dinner with friends (on me), a new car.
    It's beginning to dawn on me that verizons new plans are a blessing in diguise...

    Brian68,
    I agree the basic line charge is what is making it worse for those that just want a phone (dumb phone).
    Your reasoning that it will only cost an additional $20 is not quite the way I see it.  You are forgetting that additional data will be needed for the phones.  In other words I would need to up the data to 9-10GB.  That's an additional $10-20 per month.  So I would be going from $180/mo to $260/mo for total of $1920 over a 24 mo period.  Not to mention I would likely be paying a considerable amount for the phones as the dicounted price goes down significantly as you add lines.  That being the case, factor in another $500 or so bringing the total extra cost at $2420.
    When you do the math the absurdity of the pricing becomes more clear.

  • Planned Order creation for Sales Order and Purchase Order

    Hi
    We have a following requirement.
    In normal scenario when we have demand for material  which was created by MD61 and in addition to that if there is Sales Order the 1st planned order gets revised.To better expalin this consider possible scenario
    You create plan via MD61 for 200 qty .The system creates Planned Order for 200.
    Now there is Sales Order for 150 peices.Then what happens is original  Planed Order of 200 is changed to 50 and another planned order is created for 150 peices.The requirement is not summed.
    Now in new scenario instead of Sales Order there is Intercompany Purchase Order of 150 peices.
    Now the system is not changing original Planned Order of 200,but it created another planned order of 150.So now there are 2 Planned Orders of 150 and 200.
    What I want to know is there any way wherein the system will reduce the original planned order (similar to Sales Order scenario)
    Regards

    Hi,
    Use Strategy 52 in urs case.
    PIR witll be created .
    None convertable planned order will be created.
    Once you get sales order for that material.
    New planned order will be created which will consume PIR( planned order ).
    Eg.
    PIR 10.
    Planned order 10 qty.
    Sales oder 6
    Planned order for SO 6 qty
    Planned order through pir will become 4 qty.
    Regards,
    Vishal

  • Issue with report (S_ALR_87013611) that is actual/plan line items for Cost

    Hi Gurus,
    I am having issue with the report (S_ALR_87013611) that is actual/plan line items for Cost Center.
    When i execute the report for a cost element  510200 the amount is 23,380.13, but when i drill down on it by double click on that amount the value in obj curr is 15468.91. Hence there is the differnce. When i futher drill down by double click on the amont of 15468.91 and i go to display group currency and take the total it is 23380.13 and display in local / doc currency the amount is 15468.91. I guess due to this there is difference. The cost center & the cost elements are the same i have checket it.
    My concerns is that the group curr is USD and obj curr / local curr is USD. So is group curr and doc curr is USD then when i click on dislay curr and select group curr why the amounts are changing.
    Kindly adivce

    Try to look if there is any filtering criteria applied in the report to which you drill-down.
    The difference can be also caused by the "value type" - some reports show actual and statistical costs together in one column while the others strictly show (are defined to show) only e.g. actual costs (type 04) and not the statistical costs (type 11)

  • Getting an error while activating a planning area "Enter values for planning horizon From and planning horizon To for the storage time profile level"

    Dear S&OP community,
    I am getting following error while creating a planning ares in a newly installed sandbox. "Enter values for planning horizon From and planning horizon To for the storage time profile level".
    This what I did...
    1) Created new attributes and master data objects and activated them successfully.
    2) Time profile created and activated successfully
    3) Trying to create planing area by assigning  time profile in step 2 and assigned master data from step1..Unable to save the data and system returns 
    this error - "Enter values for planning horizon From and planning horizon To for the storage time profile level"
    My understanding is time profile needs to be active  but doesn't have to have values...
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Krishna

    YS,
    Here are my time profile settings
    Level       Name          Display Horizon - Past  Display Horizon - Future
    1             Monthly     -6                                       11         
    2             Quarterly     -2                                       3
    3             Yearly        -1                                       2
    Time profile is active and but time profile data is not loaded
    Thanks,
    Krishna

  • No planning file entry for safety stock

    hello!
    i do not have a planning file entry for safety stock. my material has required safety stock and no quantity on plant stock. therefore MD01 should create a purchase requisition - but is does not. i do not have an entry in the planning file as well.
    any ideas what could be the reason?
    thanks!
    matthias

    Hi,
    - First of all check whether MRP is activated or not for Perticuller Plant.T.code is OMDU.
    - Which MRP type is maintained for that material?
    - In rare cases (Materials uploaded by LSMW using Badi) it is observed that system miss to make the entry in Planing File.So better will be set a Back Ground job to activate Planing file OMD0 or make manual entry using T.code MD20.
    Regards,
    Dhaval

  • Collective Planned orders Scheduling for lower level orders with reference to the Superior order

    Hi All,
    Collective planned order scheduling.
    I have been trying to reschedule the superior planned order and i was expecting the lower level planned orders to reschedule based on the superior planned order.
    My problem is
    when i try to reschedule the superior planned order the system is not rescheduling the lower level planned orders.
    For example if i change the basic finish date of superior planned order as 30/09/2014 and reschedule the planned order it is only scheduling the header planned order and the lower level planned order is not scheduling.
    Could some one tell me why this is not happenning at planned order level.
    As the rescheduling of collective order will work at production order level but for some reason it is not happening at planned order level(as there is no option available to do so).
    Please give your thoughts on this asap.
    Mahee.

    Hello Mahee
    Please observe that your system is working as designed. Planned orders are scheduled independently, even when they are part of a network/collective order. Note 152319 explains the planned order scheduling in detail and it provides the following information:
    * No scheduling of overall networks is executed although a directly manufactured component is assigned.
    Note that no scheduling of the overall network is executed for planned orders. For the components requirements dates are determined. In order to cover them, planned orders are created in the next MRP run. Since the requirements are not managed using the exact time, the results of the planned order scheduling and of a scheduling of the overall network of the converted collective order can differ.
    BR
    Caetano

Maybe you are looking for