Hi,
Your condig looks good and straightthrough cable should work just fine. Can you do the following:
take the interfaces out of the portchannel
shut the portchannel
shut the interfaces
add the interfaces to the portchannel
"no sh" the PO and test again?
This should bring up the interface and the portchannel
HTH

Similar Messages

WAAS Port Channel Configuration

In the recent weeks we got some reports that CIFS writing performance to NETAPP OnTap 7.3 filer was degraded for WAAS accelerated connections. NETAPP OnTAP 7.2 and native Microsoft filers were running fine. In our Testlab we could correlate this issue with the port channel setup on our WAAS devices. With round robin (standard setting) the CIFS writing perforamce was poor. By switching the port channel loadbalancing to src-dst-ip-port the performance was excellent.
Is there any known best practices recommendation for port channel configuration on WAAS devices?
Many thanks in advance, Peter.

The best practice depends on your network. Most deployments are fine with the default round robin configuration for port channel on the WAE. But I have encountered some installations where the configuration had to be changed in order to avoid out of order packets causing slow performance (like, if there is a firewall between the WAE and the server).
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

FC Port Channel between UCS and MDS.

Hi All,
I am new to Cisco Fabric Concepts. In my enviornment i have a F port channel(8 Port Group) created on MDS 9513 switch and this Fport
channel is connected to Cisco UCS 6296 FI. The Cisco UCS Blade servers are connected to the Fabric Interconnect .
On MDS NPIV is enabled.
Can anyone explain the below questions.
1. Why do we create an F port Channel Group and connect it to the UCS FI? Is this something similar to Brocade Edge to AG Switch Connectivity.
2. How to configure F port Channel Group in MDS . Can anyone explain with an example.
3. Do we need to make any Configuration on UCS FI ports for server connectivity and Channel port Connectivity if yes what are the steps required to
do the same.Does the WWPN shows up in the FLOGI Database if the connectivity and configuration looks good in UCS FI and MDS.
4. What happens when a VSAN on MDS switch is added to the Port Channel.
Thanks and Regards,
Santosh surya

Look at my remarks in
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12468266/fc-port-channels-between-mds-and-ucs-fi-best-practice
1. Why do we create an F port Channel Group and connect it to the UCS FI? Is this something similar to Brocade Edge to AG Switch Connectivity.
F port channel is proprietary; therefore any such F port channel between UCS FI and Brocade doesn't work.
2. How to configure F port Channel Group in MDS . Can anyone explain with an example.
see eg.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/default/files/legacy/9/9/2/53299-UCS_1-4-1_F-port_channel-trunk-v1.pdf
3. Do we need to make any Configuration on UCS FI ports for server connectivity and Channel port Connectivity if yes what are the steps required to
see eg.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/sites/default/files/legacy/9/9/2/53299-UCS_1-4-1_F-port_channel-trunk-v1.pdf
Does the WWPN shows up in the FLOGI Database if the connectivity and configuration looks good in UCS FI and MDS.
flogi database is on the MDS, not FI; there are however UCS CLI commands, like "show npv ...."
4. What happens when a VSAN on MDS switch is added to the Port Channel.
If its not created on UCS, it will just not become the status "up"

Port-channel between ACE4710 and switch

Hi all,
I have configured port-channels on ACE and switch. Full-duplex and speed 1000Mbps are set on both sides. The configurations of port-channel on both sides is same. But there are output drops on the switch. See:
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:31:24
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 536
Why there are output drops on the switch? There is no half-duplex and both sides have the same speeds.
Thank you
Roman

Hi Roman,
Please paste the configuration of the ACE and Switch
Cesar R
ANS Team

Port channel between Nexus and Server is initializing

Hi all,
I will need your help.
I have Nexus 5000, there is a POrt Channel between Nexus and Server, but one port always is in initializing.
sh interface Ethernet101/1/27
Ethernet101/1/27 is down (initializing)
Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: c8f9.f920.5b5c (bia c8f9.f920.5b5c)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA
Port mode is trunk
auto-duplex, 10 Gb/s, media type is 10G
Beacon is turned off
Input flow-control is off, output flow-control is on
Rate mode is dedicated
Switchport monitor is off
Any idea?
Regards

how many ports are you using in this port channel.
can you paste the configuration of the channel ports and the interface.
check the sh log if you are getting any log related to the port channeling.

LACP port channel between 6509 and Nexus 7K

We are in the process of migrating from dual 6509's to dual 7010's. We have moved our 5k/2K's behind the 7K and have layer 2 up between the 6509 and 7K. This link is configured as a port channel with 2 1gig links using LACP. The port channel is up and working and traffic is passing but it doesn't appear the load it equally distributed between the links. Both the 7K and 6K are setup for src-dst-ip for the load balancing. The links have been in place for over 12 hours and I would have expected them to "equal" out. Has anyone had this issue in or is this to be expected? For clarification there is not VPC inolved in this configuration it is simply a port-channel between one 6509 and a 7010.
Thanks,
Joe

We are in the process of migrating from dual 6509's to dual 7010's. We have moved our 5k/2K's behind the 7K and have layer 2 up between the 6509 and 7K. This link is configured as a port channel with 2 1gig links using LACP. The port channel is up and working and traffic is passing but it doesn't appear the load it equally distributed between the links. Both the 7K and 6K are setup for src-dst-ip for the load balancing. The links have been in place for over 12 hours and I would have expected them to "equal" out. Has anyone had this issue in or is this to be expected? For clarification there is not VPC inolved in this configuration it is simply a port-channel between one 6509 and a 7010.
Thanks,
Joe

SAN Port Channel between 6120 and Brocade

Has anyone setup or know how to setup a SAN Port Channel between 6120s and a Brocade FC switch? I know that it requires UCS firmware 1.4 but I don't know what the Brocade requirements are.

The SAN port channel is Cisco proprietory. You cannot setup SAN port channel with Brocade. Sorry

Catalyst 3750G and WLC 440x - Port Channel - Configuration - Best Pactice

What is the best practice to use when configuring port channel between Catalystr 3750G switch stack and WLC 4402 / 4404 Wireless Lan Controllers:
a) Negotiate to LACP
b) Negotiate to PAgP
or
c) Hard-code to Port Channel without any negotiation.
Any pointers to any useful links - much appreciated and configuration example as well.

Answer is 'C'... channel-mode on
Configuring Neighbor Devices to Support LAG
The controller's neighbor devices must also be properly configured to support LAG.
â¢Each neighbor port to which the controller is connected should be configured as follows:
interface GigabitEthernet
switchport
channel-group mode on
no shutdown
â¢The port channel on the neighbor switch should be configured as follows:
interface port-channel
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan
switchport trunk allowed vlan
switchport mode trunk
no shutdown
Here is a link that explains it. Hope this answers your question:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/4.2/configuration/guide/c42mint.html#wp1116136
Here is a Best Practice doc:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note09186a0080810880.shtml

Port Channels - WLC 5508 and 4510

LACP and PAgP are not supported on the controller and it appears that the 4500 series will not use LAG.
interface Port-channel10
description WLC Port-Channel
switchport
switchport mode trunk
service-policy input AutoQos-4.0-Input-Policy
service-policy output OUTPUT-PRIORITY-POLICING-ETHERCHANNEL
interface GigabitEthernet3/1
description Cisco 5508 Wireless Controller
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 10 mode active
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
interface GigabitEthernet3/2
description Cisco 5508 Wireless Controller
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 10 mode active
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
I am getting the error, "lacp not enabled on remote port..". I removed the 2nd fiber cable and removed the channel-group so I could get the WLC back online. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

In order to get the ether channel to work with the WLC you need to change your configuration from:
interface GigabitEthernet3/1
channel-group 10 mode active
interface GigabitEthernet3/2
channel-group 10 mode active
To mode ON
interface GigabitEthernet3/1
channel-group 10 mode on
interface GigabitEthernet3/2
channel-group 10 mode on
Mode ON tells the switch to do Link Aggregation Protocol and does try and negotiate using one of the two control protocols LACP or PAgP.
using mode ON is part of the configuration guide when enabling Cisco WLC LAG option.

Port channel WLC 5508 and 3750

Hi All,
I want to configure Port channel for WLC 5508 and cisco 3750 Stack Switch. What changes I need to make on WLC and where?
Thanks
Jagdev

Thanks Chris,
LAG is enable on WLC, and Port channel is configured on 3750, Please see the configration and Port channel status below:-
(Cisco Controller) >show lag summary
LAG Enabled
interface Port-channel14
description Port Channel to WLC001
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
end
sh etherchannel 14 summary
Flags: D - down        P - bundled in port-channel
        I - stand-alone s - suspended
        H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
        R - Layer3      S - Layer2
        U - in use      f - failed to allocate aggregator
        M - not in use, minimum links not met
        u - unsuitable for bundling
        w - waiting to be aggregated
        d - default port
Number of channel-groups in use: 14
Number of aggregators:           14
Group Port-channel Protocol    Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
14     Po14(SD)        LACP      Gi1/0/22(I) Gi2/0/22(I)
sh run int g1/0/22
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 209 bytes
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/22
description Trunk to WLC001 DistPort1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 254
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 14 mode active
end
sh run int g2/0/22
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 209 bytes
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/22
description Trunk to WLC001 DistPort2
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 254
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 14 mode active
end

Clearing port channel configurations

In one of my 6509s I've got a lot of old port channel configs listed that I can't remove. How do I remove them short of clearing the config entirely?
Here's an example...
set port channel 3/41-42 64
set port channel 3/43-44 65
set port channel 6/47-48 67
set port channel 3/13-14 68
set port channel 9/5-6 86
set port channel 9/9-11 87
set port channel 2/2 93
set port channel 7/1-4 100
set port channel 7/25-28 106
set port channel 7/37-40 109
set port channel 7/41-44 110
set port channel 7/45-48 111
set port channel 4/5-8 112
set port lacp-channel 5/22,5/45 126
set port channel 6/29-30 127
set port channel 9/13-14 128
set port channel 9/12 129
set port channel 9/15-16 161
set port channel 4/41 537
set port channel 6/31-32 538
set port channel 8/1-4 661
set port channel 9/1-4 665
set port channel 1/1,2/1 719
set port channel 8/11-12 720
set port channel 8/13-16 721
set port channel 8/9-10 722
set port channel 8/7-8 723
set port channel 8/5-6 725
set port channel 4/9-12 726
set port channel 3/5-8 731
set port channel 3/1-4 732
set port channel 4/1-4 733
set port channel 9/7-8 734
set port channel 3/15-16 828
I can't do a "clear port channel" or anything like that.

Hi Friend,
I don't think you can remove this commands from configuration till the time you reuse this ports with etherchannel configuration.
The best idea will be copy the configuration from switch and paste it on a notepad and delete these lines and copy from notepad again and paste it on switch and I think this will take care of your issue.
HTH, if yes please rate the post.
Ankur

ASA5550 port channel configuration ERROR: nameif not allowed on empty etherchannel interface

Hi All,
I am having problem when configure port channel on asa5550
IOS ver asa914-k8.bin also in ver 9.02   and 8.47.
Please let me know how can I solve this problem.
UK-LON-FW(config)# int port-channel 3
UK-LON-FW(config-if)# vlan 245
                       ^
ERROR: % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
UK-LON-FW(config-if)# nameif secure
ERROR: nameif not allowed on empty etherchannel interface.
UK-LON-FW(config-if)#
here is my interfaces configuration:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description fw1:G0/0 to uk-lon-gw1:e1/8 fw2:G0/0 to uk-lon-gw2:e1/9 outside zone
channel-group 1 mode on
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description fw1:G0/1 to uk-lon-gw2:e1/8 fw2:G0/1 to uk-lon-gw1:e1/9 outside zone
channel-group 1 mode on
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description fw1:G0/2 to uk-lon-sw1a:1 fw2:G0/2 to uk-lon-sw1a:2 dmz
channel-group 2 mode on
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
description fw1:G0/3 to uk-lon-sw1b: fw2:G0/3 to uk-lon-sw1b:2 dmz
channel-group 2 mode on
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Management0/0
management-only
nameif management
security-level 0
ip address 10.10.51.18 255.255.254.0
interface GigabitEthernet1/0
description fw1:G1/0 to uk-lon-sw1a:3 fw2:G1/0 to uk-lon-sw1a:4 secure zone
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet1/1
description fw1:G1/1 to uk-lon-sw1b:3 fw2:G1/1 to uk-lon-sw1b:4 secure zone
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet1/2
description LAN Failover Interface
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet1/3
description STATE Failover Interface
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Port-channel1
description outside zone
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Port-channel1.5
description outside zone Bundle FW:G0/0-G0/1 connect to GW1:e1/8-GW2:e1/8
vlan 5
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 216.239.105.5 255.255.255.128 standby 216.239.105.6
interface Port-channel2
description dmz Bunlde uk-lon-fw:G0/2-3 to sw1a:1-2 sw1b:1-2
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Port-channel2.105
description dmz
vlan 105
nameif dmz
security-level 50
ip address 216.239.105.193 255.255.255.192 standby 216.239.105.194
interface Port-channel3
description secure zone Bunlde uk-lon-fw:G1/0-1 to sw1a:3-3 sw1b:3-4
no nameif
security-level 100
ip address 10.254.105.1 255.255.255.0 standby 10.254.105.2
UK-LON-FW(config-if)#

Hi Marvin,
Thank you for your answer. I did everything but it did not work. Turn out it is a bug ver 8.45 will let you created the sub logical interface but actually it did not work right. Verson 9.x doesn't let you create more than 2 port channel (limitation of ASA5550 hardware).
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCtq62715/?reffering_site=dumpcr
Also, you can see the 8.4 release notes were you can see that it is not supported:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa84/release/notes/asarn84.html#pgfId-522232
Interface Features
EtherChannel support (ASA 5510 and higher)
You can configure up to 48 802.3ad EtherChannels of eight active interfaces each.
Note You cannot use interfaces on the 4GE SSM, including the integrated 4GE SSM in slot 1 on the ASA 5550, as part of an EtherChannel.
We introduced the following commands: channel-group , lacp port-priority , interface port-channel , lacp max-bundle , port-channel min-bundle , port-channel load-balance , lacp system-priority , clear lacp counters , show lacp , show port-channel .

Port Channel Issue on Cisco 2960s-24ts

Hi All
Last week at a customer site we installed a 2nd 2960s 24 port switch to form a stack using flexstack cables, and the switch stack is working as expected as I can see a master switch and 2nd switch as a member.
For redundancy / resilience we decided to use port 24 on each switch over copper for trunk uplinks to our core switch. The issue that we're having is I can't ping the switch management address. I can however see the address in the arp table and the edge switch is visible when I run show cdp nei. As a work around I've shutdown one of the ports to the downlink from core to edge in order to ping the management address of the switch which is in vlan 1. I'd like to get the port-channel working on both sides for resilience.
ANY HELP IS APPRECIATED...
Core switch is a WS-C3750G-24TS-1U running software version C3750 Boot Loader (C3750-HBOOT-M) Version 12.2(25r)SEE4, C3750 Software (C3750-IPBASE-M)
Edge switch is a WS-C2960S-24TS-L running software version C2960S Boot Loader (C2960S-HBOOT-M) Version 12.2(53r)SE,C2960S Software (C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M)
The config on the edge switch which goes to the core is :
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24
description *****
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 6 mode on
end
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/24
description *****
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 6 mode on
end
interface Port-channel6
description ******
switchport mode trunk
end
The config on the downlink ports from the core to the edge:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/20
description Edge
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 20 mode on
end
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/20
description Edge
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
shutdown
channel-group 20 mode on
end
interface Port-channel20
description Edge
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
end

when using channel-group # on mode you must make sure the ports are on same duplex and speed setting
what happens when you use active mode?

Port channel configuration with VMware

Hi everyone, I have dual 6120 interconnects, each of which have two uplink ports. I also have two Catalyst 4900M switches to uplink to. So I plan to configure both 802.1q and 802.3ad on each of the 6120 uplink pairs. My question relates to the physical cabling, bearing in mind ESX will be running on the blades.
Would you cable both the uplink ports on interconnect 1 to switch 1? Or would you cross-connect them to both switch 1 and switch 2?
As per this article I see ESX does not support splitting a port channel across two switches, but I am unsure how the presence of the 6120s affects this. Can anyone suggest the best way of doing the cabling based on the kit I have? Thanks.
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=1001938&sliceId=1&docTypeID=DT_KB_1_1&dialogID=14912551&stateId=1%200%2014916516

Hey Simon, let's address this is two parts because there are two layers: server-bound (ESX-6120) and north-bound (6120-Cat4900).
At the ESX end, use the default srcPort in the vSwitch / port group with both 10GbE uplink ports (vmnic0 and vmnic1) set to active (not active/passive). There are no loops in this configuration. On the VNIC (in UCSM) you select trunk port and allow all the VLANs that your vSwitch port groups needs. If you don't use a VLAN for the Service Console/ESXi Management, then make sure you set Native to the correct VLAN in the VNIC to allow untagged traffic down the right path.
At the 6120 you can't explicitly configure a trunk for border ports, they are already set so and when you add VLANs they are added to every border port trunk configuration. You, of course, need to make sure the Cat4900 ports at the other end of the cable have the same trunkport VLAN configuration.
So in summary - set VLANs in vSwitch port groups, VNIC in UCSM and northbound switch.
Now when it comes to port channels, you can only configure two or more border ports as a port channel if they are cabled to the same Cat4900. If you had Nexus 5k/7k northbound then you could use vPC on them to allow "mesh" cabling (ie. one 6120 connects to both Nexus switches). But as you aren't using Nexus you will end up with a configuration as Jeremy explained:
ESX --> vSwitch0 --> srcPort load balancing --> 2 active uplinks --> many port groups
6120-a --> Cat4900-a
6120-b --> Cat4900-b
However, I would still recommend using a couple of border ports in a port channel on each fabric to each Cat4900 because, if you pull out a cable/lose a port, then when that port is re-enabled the existing live traffic is redistributed whereas without the port channel only new traffic will be spread across both links.
Cheers
Steve
Cisco UCS Team

Interface port-channel btw N2K and Brocade VDX

Dear all,
I tried to configure a port-channel between a nexus 2K (2FEX) and a brocade VDX (VDX6710).
As you seen below, my configuration :
N2K
Po10
switchport access vlan 200
Eth101/1/6
switchport access vlan 200
channel-group 10 mode active (used LACP)
Eth102/1/6
switchport access vlan 200
channel-group 10 mode active (used LACP)
VDX
interface Port-channel 27
vlag ignore-split
speed 1000
switchport
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 200
spanning-tree shutdown
no shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet 21/0/31
channel-group 27 mode active type standard
lacp timeout long
no shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet 22/0/31
channel-group 27 mode active type standard
lacp timeout long
no shutdown
Unfortunately, we can't up the link for interfaces and so the port-channel.
We have the next message from the N5K for FEX :
%ETHPORT-5-IF_ADMIN_UP: Interface Ethernet101/1/6 is admin up .
%ETHPORT-5-SPEED: Interface Ethernet101/1/6, operational speed changed to 1 Gbps
%ETHPORT-5-IF_DUPLEX: Interface Ethernet101/1/6, operational duplex mode changed to Full
%ETHPORT-5-IF_RX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface Ethernet101/1/6, operational Receive Flow Control state changed to off
%ETHPORT-5-IF_TX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface Ethernet101/1/6, operational Transmit Flow Control state changed to on
%ETHPORT-5-IF_UP: Interface Ethernet101/1/6 is up in mode access
%ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_NONE: Interface Ethernet101/1/6 is down (None)
%ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_ERROR_DISABLED: Interface Ethernet101/1/6 is down (Error disabled. Reason:BPDUGuard)
Any idea about the configuration ?
Thanks for your help.
Matthieu

Fexes are really made to connect hosts and not switches . So the ports should not see bpdu's so bpduguard is err-disabling the ports.
Spanning Tree Protocol
HIFs go down with the BPDUGuard errDisable message
HIFs go down accompanied with the message, BPDUGuard errDisable.
Possible Cause
By default, the HIFs are in STP edge mode with the BPDU guard enabled. This means that the HIFs are supposed to be connected to hosts or non-switching devices. If they are connected to a non-host device/switch that is sending BPDUs, the HIFs become error-disabled upon receiving a BPDU.
Solution
Enable the BPDU filter on the HIF and on the peer connecting device. With the filter enabled, the HIFs do not send or receive any BPDUs. Use the following commands to confirm the details of the STP port state for the port:

Port-channel configuration 3560X and 2960S

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for