Port Forwarding and Loopback with HomeHub 3B

There have been a number of threads discussing port forwarding and loopback, so I thought it might be useful to summarise my experiences. I have two HomeHub 3Bs on separate lines, one is a standard broadband line, the other is on an Infinity connection. My experience is limited to these two specific devices :-)
Port Forwarding does work but it is "temperamental" and "arcane" in the way you need to set it up. Although I have had it running perfectly, I have also had experiences where the router has refused to "accept" my changes. Tentatively, I put this down to the fact that I was running a Seagate GoFlex network drive on the network and this piece of equipment (definitely a Do Not Buy) was acting aggressively and screwing up the DDNS allocations. But ... YMMV
One definite probllem with Port Forwarding is if you attempt to specify a range of addresses. I have failed to get this to work on both my hubs. In my case I was trying to forward (say) 8021-8022 to 21-22, and the router insisted on forwarding both 8021 and 8022 to port 21.  The cure is to set up each port as a separate rule within the same user-defined application.
On Loopback, I know various people have said it doesnt work, but it has always worked fine for me, at both the locations where I have a HomeHub 3B. I use a DDNS service and I can test that my port forwarding is working by opening a Command Prompt window on my PC and typing  telnet mydomain.dyndns.web.com 21 or whatever. That command contacts my DDNS host to ascertain my IP address and then (attempts to) connect to port 21.
If port 21 is closed on your router (i.e. you have no port forwarding in place) you will see the message attempting to connect to mydomain.dyndns.web.com... and, after a while that will time out, with Could not open connection to the host, on port 21: Connect failed. If you do have your port forwarding set up correctly then your application will respond in some appropriate mannerr. However, you do need to understand what youre doing, because the response of an application that is expecting HTTP data is simply to do nothing!  You will probably get a blank screen. If you type GET / HTTP/1.1 [note spaces] (which is not echoed to your screen, so be careful not to mistype it) you will receive a page of HTTP response data and HTML data. Thus proving that your port forwarding is working.
If you do not have any port forwarding set up at all, you can still test the loopback function by attempting to connect to port 161. This port is open on the BT routers and telnetting to it will result in a blank screen (as opposed to the attempting to connect message).
In summary: loopback works on the Home Hub 3B. Port forwarding also works to a degree but it is temperamental and does have some quirks, like not properly accepting ranges of ports. On this last point, at least, it would be helpful to get an acknowledgement from BT that this is a known fault.

There have been a number of threads discussing port forwarding and loopback, so I thought it might be useful to summarise my experiences. I have two HomeHub 3Bs on separate lines, one is a standard broadband line, the other is on an Infinity connection. My experience is limited to these two specific devices :-)
Port Forwarding does work but it is "temperamental" and "arcane" in the way you need to set it up. Although I have had it running perfectly, I have also had experiences where the router has refused to "accept" my changes. Tentatively, I put this down to the fact that I was running a Seagate GoFlex network drive on the network and this piece of equipment (definitely a Do Not Buy) was acting aggressively and screwing up the DDNS allocations. But ... YMMV
One definite probllem with Port Forwarding is if you attempt to specify a range of addresses. I have failed to get this to work on both my hubs. In my case I was trying to forward (say) 8021-8022 to 21-22, and the router insisted on forwarding both 8021 and 8022 to port 21.  The cure is to set up each port as a separate rule within the same user-defined application.
On Loopback, I know various people have said it doesnt work, but it has always worked fine for me, at both the locations where I have a HomeHub 3B. I use a DDNS service and I can test that my port forwarding is working by opening a Command Prompt window on my PC and typing  telnet mydomain.dyndns.web.com 21 or whatever. That command contacts my DDNS host to ascertain my IP address and then (attempts to) connect to port 21.
If port 21 is closed on your router (i.e. you have no port forwarding in place) you will see the message attempting to connect to mydomain.dyndns.web.com... and, after a while that will time out, with Could not open connection to the host, on port 21: Connect failed. If you do have your port forwarding set up correctly then your application will respond in some appropriate mannerr. However, you do need to understand what youre doing, because the response of an application that is expecting HTTP data is simply to do nothing!  You will probably get a blank screen. If you type GET / HTTP/1.1 [note spaces] (which is not echoed to your screen, so be careful not to mistype it) you will receive a page of HTTP response data and HTML data. Thus proving that your port forwarding is working.
If you do not have any port forwarding set up at all, you can still test the loopback function by attempting to connect to port 161. This port is open on the BT routers and telnetting to it will result in a blank screen (as opposed to the attempting to connect message).
In summary: loopback works on the Home Hub 3B. Port forwarding also works to a degree but it is temperamental and does have some quirks, like not properly accepting ranges of ports. On this last point, at least, it would be helpful to get an acknowledgement from BT that this is a known fault.

Similar Messages

  • Port Forwarding and Printing with Static IP Address

    Hey there -
    I am trying to setup a network printer that can be printed to from anywhere in the world. My organization has 5 static IP addresses given to us by our ISP. Four of those I have on computers, and one of them I have on my Linksys router (WRT54G v.8).
    What I want to do is be able to setup a printer on my router that I can print to from anywhere I have an internet connection. My wireless router's static IP address is 74.172.54.XXX - The address on my network is 192.168.7.1 - I have a printer statically assigned the IP address 192.168.7.2 - and I have a port forwarding for port 70 to forward to 192.168.7.2
    In theory, I would think that now I could print to 74.172.54.XXX:70 and have no problems. But that doesn't seem to be working. Even printing to 192.168.7.1:70 doesn't seem to work either.
    Also, the printer has a web GUI interface that if I type http://192.168.7.1/ into my browser it comes up, so in theory I would think typing http://74.172.54.XXX:70 into my browser it should come up (but it doesn't nor does http://192.168.7.1:70).
    Anybody got any suggestions? I tried to do a search about this, but ever Port Forwarding question seemed to deal with gaming (which I have no desire to do). Thanks!
    I will include two screen snapshots of what I am talking about:
    Thanks for any help.

    Is the router setup to accept static connections?
    I have my router set up to accept both, so from 192.168.1.100 to 192.168.1.192 the addresses are static the other addresses are given by DHCP.
    If you do not define a range and the address your laptop has as static IP conflicts with the address given by DHCP your loose ... as in you get no address.
    Set up of that feature may depend on your type of router but usually any decent router will have that capability ... read your manual for specifics about your unit.
    Best of luck.
    R.
    Last edited by ralvez (2009-12-10 00:08:50)

  • How to set up port forwarding on extreme with NAS

    I've purchased a NAS (Synology DS211j with 2 caviar HD) over a month ago. Setting up the NAS for wireless connection locally was easy. I've been trying for 3 weeks on how to set-up port forwarding on my airport extreme base. I''ve researched and read countless threads on port forwarding and still cannot grasp the concept and the step by step provided.  I need somebody that's patient enough to hand hold and guide me through this frustrating problem.
    Equipment:
    Comcast cable modem connected into Airport Extreme Base
    Synology DS211j connected to Airport Extreme Base
    Problem:
    Cannot connect to my DiskStation via internet from wherever
    confused whether to use FTP or Personal file sharing or whatever is the most suitable for my needs
    Just need to access files on my DiskStation view/upload/download from wherever I'm at, whether on PC or Macbook Pro
    Thanks in advance!
    Marcus

    Here are the basic steps to configure your NAS for port mapping:
    AEBSn - Port Mapping Setup
    To setup port mapping on an 802.11n AirPort Extreme Base Station (AEBSn), either connect to the AEBSn's wireless network or temporarily connect directly, using an Ethernet cable, to one of the LAN port of the AEBSn, and then use the AirPort Utility, in Manual Setup, to make these settings:
    1. Reserve a DHCP-provided IP address for the host device.
    AirPort Utility > Select the AEBSn > Manual Setup > Internet > DHCP tab
    On the DHCP tab, click the "+" (Add) button to enter DHCP Reservations.
    Description: <enter the desired description of the host device>
    Reserve address by: MAC Address
    Click Continue.
    MAC Address: <enter the MAC (what Apple calls Ethernet ID if you are using wired or AirPort ID if wireless) hardware address of the host computer>
    IPv4 Address: <enter the desired IP address>
    Click Done.
    2. Setup Port Mapping on the AEBSn.
    AirPort Utility > Select the AEBSn > Manual Setup >Advanced > Port Mapping tab
    Click the "+" (Add) button
    Service: <choose the appropriate service from the Service pop-up menu>
    Public UDP Port(s): <enter the appropriate UDP port values>
    Public TCP Port(s): <enter the appropriate TCP port values>
    Private IP Address: <enter the IP address of the host server>
    Private UDP Port(s): <enter the same as Public UDP Ports or your choice>
    Private TCP Port(s): <enter the same as Public TCP Ports or your choice>
    Click "Continue"
    (ref: "Well Known" TCP and UDP ports used by Apple software products)

  • NAT port-forwarding and WAN side IP addresses

    I have my Airport Extreme setup to forward port 21 to an FTP server on the LAN side of my network. The AE is connected via DSL to my ISP.
    When a client from the WAN side connects to my server, the server's LOGS don't list the IP of the client, rather it says the client connected from my assigned WAN IP. For example (fake ip's):
    Client ----> AE ----> FTP-SERVER
    130.129.12.3 76.99.89.3 10.0.1.2
    Log states client connected
    from IP: 76.99.89.3
    My previous Linksys router, with the same DSL modem and ISP, would report the client as connecting from 130.129.12.3.
    Am I missing something in how I am configureing my AE? Or, is this how the AE manages port-forwarding and there's nothing I can do about it?
    I used to use firewall rules to control access to the FTP server, i.e. rules set on the server. This can't be done anymore with the AE operating as it does.

    Seems to me that the NAT translation in the Airport 802.11n is such that it does not use the incoming IP of clients connecting from the WAN side to a computer on the LAN side. The ingoing and outgoing packets reach their respective destinations, it is just that the AE uses some kind of non-standard routing (at least not that I am used to working with).
    This is bad because it prevents the use of some forms of access controls on BSD and Linux servers on the LAN side, TCP Wrappers and iptables for example. This can create obvious security problems when WAN ports are set to forward to such a LAN client. We are already getting hit with robot-like script attacks on our server, this was a problem with our Linksys router, but with the above mentioned tools and scripts we were able to block abusive clients.
    Perhaps an Apple can work on resolving this issue in a future firmware release, at least make it an option... Anyone from Apple out there?
    jmj

  • Time Capsule 2 TB, stops port forwarding and cannot be accessed by AAU

    Hi
    I am having the above problem off and on since purchasing the TC. It is dialing in PPOE (fiber optic), connects fine to internet and feeds internet reliably by wireless and wired connections. It will however stop port forwarding and allowing access by Finder or Airport Util. simultaneously at what appears to be random intervals.
    I can unplug the electric and power back on and all is fixed for a week or so. This of course causes havoc with time machine, web server on the network, vpn service etc.
    I have all the updates on AAU osx and I believe everything possible.
    I have the TC, a mini running osx server 10.6.3, a macbook pro, macbook air (Leopard). All running 10.6.3 except the Air.
    I run time machine on all the computers but usually do it manually to avoid 2 machines accessing the Tc at the same time, though sometimes I forget to turn TM off and 2 comps. may be trying to access TC through Time Mach. simultaneously.
    I also have another wireless router getting the internet and making a wireless network in a separate building.
    I have read all the posts but do not see any clear solution or mention of the port forwarding stopping along with access.
    Any help appreciated. If it's defective my year will be coming up, so I want to figure this out now.

    Hi Bob,
    Yes I did a hard reset in order to set it up. I then used the Airport Utility to give it a Network name and base station name that was different from the Wireless AC one upstairs. I left everything else set to defaults and used 'Create a new wireless network'. Added some passwords and then let it boot itself. It all worked ok but as I mentioned I can then only access this downstairs network. The Wireless AC one then refuses to connect afterwards. The only way I can get the Wireless AC to work is to switch off the Wireless N one and then reboot the Wireless AC.
    Maybe I need to change the DHCP port ranges or something ? Is it correct to have x2 networks ?. I dont see any other option given wireless wont reach and I cant cable between the two to create a bridged network.

  • Port forwarding and DMZ refuses to work properly on WRT54G wireless router.

    I have a network setup on the wireless WRT54G version 8 (with latest firmware) router and port forwarding and DMZ refuse to work correctly. I'm trying to use bittorrent and connect my xbox360 to my computer and neither work properly even after setting up port forwarding in the "Applications and Gaming" tab.
    here's a screenshot of my port forwarding page:
    http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/1497/linksysbg2.jpg
    here's a screenshot of the DMZ page (my computer's IP ends in 102 obviously):
    http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/2131/linksys1rf5.jpg
    now, I've experienced this type of problem before. On a different linksys router a year or 2 back I remember the DMZ never working on that one either and I eventually had to buy a d-link router which worked perfectly. I'm only using this wireless router because it's my roommates and he brought it up. Somebody please explain to me why this isn't working correctly. I am becoming more and more frustrated as I lose faith in linksys routers. Thanks

    Did you tired upgrade of the firmware on the router??
    Also after upgrade reset & reconfigure the router for few seconds ... so that the firmware works properly for longer time ....

  • Port forwarding and LAN traffic suddenly stopped working

    My WRT54G was chugging along happily for many months, and suddenly all port forwarding and local LAN traffic stopped flowing. All PCs behind the router on the LAN side can get to all WAN sites just fine, but they cannot ping one another. All of them can ping the router (192.168.1.1) just fine.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Curtis

    I solved this.  Turned out to not be the router at all, but the accidental enablement of the "Stateful Firewall" within my Cisco VPN client.  Once this option is turned on, the machine gets isolated from the LAN, even when the VPN client isn't visibly running.

  • Difference Between Port Forwarding and Port Triggering.

    Hi guys,
    I'm lost! The differences between port forwarding and port triggering is driving me nuts! It all seems very subtle to me. Can anyone explain to me (in a very simple way) what exactly are their differences. Thanks in advance!!

    Port Forwarding
    The big difference between this and port triggering is that forwarding is fixed.. you forward a port and it is always forwarded.. IE available to connection.. basically the forwarded port is excluded from the fire walling abilities of the router.  Second it is static and applies to one machine only. Whereas you could set port triggering to the router and thereafter any machine on the LAN can trigger it unless its already in use.. port forwarding must be specified for each individual machine.
    Port forwarding requires you to give each PC on the network its own unique static IP address.. Although there is ssh port forwarding that can be set dynamically. Most users only have the option of static ip port forwarding.
    The real downside of port forwarding is that it can be very tricky to set up... You may have to allow a series of ports on a machine and have to do that for each machine you want to allow through. Also routers often have limited abilities and may not allow you the ability to forward a port or select the service you require.
    Port Triggering
     This is a way of Dynamically assigning a service to a port WHEN it is required by an outgoing service. The port is initially not allowed so nothing can get in and you are protected by your network.  
    A good example of this is when using Yahoo! voice .. the voice works fine for a few minutes after you connect to Yahoo! then Yahoo! sends some kind of packet that requires a response from your PC... The packet is allowed in through your router no prob but the outgoing reply is not authorized to open a port on the router and is thus blocked. 
    'ope this helps

  • Port Forwarding and Internet Sharing

    Hey all,
    I have a wireless network set up through a Time Capsule. My iBook is connected to this network via Airport. In addition, I have a computer with no wireless connected to my laptop via Ethernet. I have my System Preferences set up to Share Internet with Built-In Ethernet. The problem is this. I want to use the second computer (which accesses the Internet fine) as a server. The Airport does not recognize the second computer as a Client, but does see the iBook. I believe I need to Forward Ports to the iBook (local IP: 10.0.1.5) and then forward them again with the iBook to the other computer which has the local IP 196.168.2.2.
    Is my thinking right in this? How would I need to configure this to make it work as I've explained?
    If I'm unclear I can clarify.
    Thanks,
    Daniel

    Hi Daniel,
    I think the problem is, is that the Internet Sharing isa pass through connection.
    Try this, in Network>Show:>Network Port Configurations, duplicate the Airport interface, make sure the on used for internet is dragged to the top of the list, then Manually configure if need be, the second one to join the local Network.

  • Can anyone tell me how to port forward and setup an XBOX 360 using my Time Capsule??

    Xbox 360
    When playing the game online, the minimum speed of your network should be 128kbps. The ideal network speed for playing the game online is 768kbps. If you are having a problems with lag check the following:
    Network Troubleshooting:
    Disable any firewall or security features on your router.
    Set port forwarding on your router to the IP address of your Xbox 360. This game uses port 3074 (UDP/TCP). Additionally Xbox LIVE requires ports 80, 53 TCP and 88, 53 UDP.
    Place your Xbox 360 into the DMZ of your router.
    Disconnect your router and try the game. If it works regularly at this point something about your router may not be completely compatible with the specific needs of this game. Check with your router manufacturer and Microsoft's Xbox Live Connection Issues page for additional steps that may need to be done to resolve the issue you are having. You can also verify that you have an Xbox Live compatible router.
    If you are having issues connecting while multiple Xbox 360 consoles are connected on the same network, try forwarding port 3074 (UDP/TCP) for one Xbox 360 and setting the other as DMZ. There is a chance that this may not resolve you issue,  if it doesn’t then you may want to consider getting an additional public IP address by contacting your Internet Service Provider and assigning it to one of these two consoles.
    NOTE: If setting port forwarding or DMZ helps your connection issue, you may want to assign your Xbox 360 a static IP address within your home network. This can help to ensure that the configurations you made do not need to be done again. You can visit PortForward's Static IP Guide for a detailed guide on how to do this.
    NOTE: Many broadband internet modems are coming with routing capabilities built in. Please contact your internet service provider to determine if your internet modem has an integrated router. If it does, they should be able to assist you with the steps above for setting up your router.
    Once you have verified that your network setup is not the cause of the issue, try the following:
    Try connecting to a different server. Some servers may have other players connected to them that you do not have an optimal connection with. In most games this is accomplished by backing out to the main menu and then selecting multiplayer again. From there you can try connecting to another online game.
    Run the Xbox Network Self Test to see how strong your NAT is currently set to. Once the test is completed you will be notified if there is an issue with your connection. If you select "More Info" you will be given information about your NAT type and some steps to resolve any issues with your connection.
    Moderate and Strict NAT types may have issues connecting to online matches. You may get the error "Notice - The game session is no longer available." If you do then enabling UPnP, forwarding port 3074, or placing your Xbox in your router's DMZ may resolve this issue. Please consult your router documentation for instructions on how to do this.

    ouman88 wrote:
    Whoa....this just went way over my head.... I already have 6.1 installed for my Airport Utility.
    Read again what I wrote.. 6.1 is the problem.. or part of it.
    You need to install the earlier 5.6 version which I have given you explicit instructions to do.
    I have done something now and can not connect the XBOX at all now....unless you can provide me step by step directions I may have to call Apple Support.
    This will happen over and over.. just press reset and start again.. you need to learn how to do the setup and using 5.6 utility will help you.. as will using ethernet from the computer to the TC.. trying to fix things over wireless is like sitting on a tree branch you are sawing off. As soon as you update you will fall to the ground.
    I am not that sure that Apple Support will have any idea.
    Do a google search .. you will find most people struggle with this.. Microsoft made the xbox to use upnp with vista specs.. if you use a router without upnp, ie any apple router.. you will have issues.
    Have a go at bypassing the problem.. I have no idea if this will work.. I do not use a TC as the main router because much of my network including xbox and ps3 is just a pain.. I use a modem router with upnp. And bridge the TC.. that is the setup I would recommend.
    Try this.. once you have installed 5.6 utility.
    Get the IP of the XBox and click enable default host.. and put the IP address in there.. this is called DMZ.. all unassigned packets are forwarded to this ip address.. it is like a port forwarding for all ports.
    See if it helps.. If it does you will need to lock the xbox address so it doesn't change.. we can get to that.
    Tell me what kind of broadband you have and what modem router first.. none of this will work if you have double NAT.

  • Port Forward and IP address question

    I am configuring my father's computer so that I can "see" his screen. He's on a different network, using a mac with a wireless router. He enables remote desktop login, I use Chicken of the VNC software on my mac to see and control his computer.
    Here's my question, when I set up his router to forward the ports so this will work, do I use the ports for apple remote desktop or VNC? (The ports overlap (5900) but are different.)
    Also, which IP address do I enter into Chicken of the VNC? His router IP, his static IP that we assigned or his computer's IP.
    Thanks for the help,
    Rob

    ok, but in his prefs for apple remote desktop, it gives the static IP address that we set as the address other people can use, so... any thoughts?
    You use that private address if you are in the same subnet as his Mac. That is the address you enter into the port forwarding settings on the router because the router needs to send requests received on the public IP address to that unreachable private IP address.
    When you are on the internet, you can't reach that private IP address.

  • Port Forwarding and Static IP addresses

    Netcomm NB1300 router and Airport Express.
    I want to use and old G3 mac running 10.3.9 as a server for HTTP and FTP. The Mac is currently connected via Airport but I can connect it via Ethernet if necessary.
    I understand that I will have to activate Port Forwarding on my Router with Ports 21 and 80 to allow external Internet access to the G3. I will also have to configure DHCP Manually for a Static IP address and probably link up with a Free DNS service to maintain reliable access to the G3.
    I have other computers on the network, two Macs (Ethernet / 10.3.9 & Airport 10.4.11) and two PC's (one with Vista, one with XP / both on Airport). Only one of the extra Macs is connected via ethernet, the rest are connected via Airport.
    Will I have to assign Static IP addresses to all the computers or just the one I want to use as a server?
    And also, can anyone tell me about Port Forwarding via Port 22 to give more security from external observation/attacks? I know nothing about this security measure.
    Thanks in advance.
    Christo.

    Hi--
    Christo wrote:
    I am now assuming I will be able to access the 'server' from an external location. Very optimistic! But I can't test that for a couple of days.
    Ah, but you've given up too soon! You can access your web server from outside your network real easy: you just need to find an external client you can point back to your site. I like to use the W4C validator to do that. It has the happy side effect of also telling you if your web page markup is valid. So you'd point your browser to the validator page:
    http://validator.w3.org/
    I like to choose "More Options" and tell it to show the page source. That way I can also verify that it's seeing the page I want it to see.
    If I disconnect the iBook from Ethernet, can it still be accessible from an external location if it is connected to the Router via Airport, or do I have do so something like Port Forwarding with my Airport Express as well? Note the iBook can still connect to the Internet via Airport.
    It would depend on how your Airport is set up. I think there are a couple of ways to set them up. One is to make the Airport a DHCP server, which would make the wireless network essentially a separate network. In that case, you'd have to forward throught the Airport, too.
    My wireless network, though, is set up to bridge, so it's all one network. In that case, all I'd have to do to forward wirelessly to a client would be to set up the forward on the main router.
    Being that persons other than myself will be accessing the iBook via FTP, do I give them the user account password of the Mac, or can I set a password in the Router or something else?
    Also, when accessing the iBook on my local network using Cyberduck, I can see the entire directory of the iBook's user account. Is there a way to limit access to just one folder, such as the Public folder, or a self-designated folder?
    Unfortunately, I don't know anything about setting up FTP. I would suggest that you look into maybe making an account on the iBook specifically for the FTP user and only give out that username and password. You might want to poke around in the Networking and the Web and Unix discussions in the Mac OS X Technologies area. I've seen a number of posts there about setting up FTP, and you might be able to find your answers there.
    charlie

  • RTSP steaming Port Forward (?) problems with 4 (four) WVC54GCA cameras on WRT54G v2 router.

    I am having difficulties correctly setting up my four (4) WVC54GCA cameras on a WRT54G v2 router to make them stream RTSP videos that I can view on my BlackBerry Bold. I can access the cameras from the internet, through  
    http://CAM1_SubDomain.Linksys-Cam.com/1024  
    http://CAM2_SubDomain.Linksys-Cam.com/1025 
    http://CAM3_SubDomain.Linksys-Cam.com/1026
    http://CAM4_SubDomain.Linksys-Cam.com/1027 
    so that part works fine.
    All the 4 cameras are set up with static IP addresses.
    The default RTSP port 554 and RTP Data port at 5000 are forwarded to CAM1 IP address. I can access CAM1 RTSP feed on my Blackberry Bold (and also on a good old Samsung SGH-A706 cell phone).  
    CAM 1 Settings:
    STATIC IP: 192.168.1.201
    Alternate HTTP Port: 1024 à Forwarded to 192.168.1.201
    RTSP Port: 554 à Forwarded to 192.168.1.201
    RTSP Data Port: 5000 à Forwarded to 192.168.1.201
    RTSP access on cell phone WORKS only with the following format: rtsp://CAM1_SubDomain.Linksys-Cam.com/1111, where 1111 is the access code. 
    CAM 2 Settings:
    STATIC IP: 192.168.1.202
    Alternate HTTP Port: 1025 à Forwarded to 192.168.1.202
    RTSP Port: 1029 à Forwarded to 192.168.1.202
    RTSP Data Port: NOT SURE IF I NEED TO FORWARD ONE, HELP PLEASE
    Despite I have a dedicated subdomain for each camera from TZO, the following link DOESN’T WORK 
    rtsp://CAM2_SubDomain.Linksys-Cam.com/1111, where 1111 is the access code.
    Actually, when I enter the above link, the cellphone brings in the feed from CAM1, I guess due to the identical access code with CAM2. Once I change the access code for CAM2, it doesn’t’t show any feed. 
    CAM 3 Settings:
    STATIC IP: 192.168.1.203
    Alternate HTTP Port: 1026 à Forwarded to 192.168.1.203
    RTSP Port: 1030 à Forwarded to 192.168.1.203
    RTSP Data Port: NOT SURE IF I NEED TO FORWARD ONE HELP PLESE
    Despite I have a dedicated subdomain for each camera from TZO, the following link DOESN’T WORK 
    rtsp://CAM3_SubDomain.Linksys-Cam.com/1111, where 1111 is the access code. This feed also brings in CAM1.  
    CAM 4 Settings:
    STATIC IP: 192.168.1.204
    Alternate HTTP Port: 1027 à Forwarded to 192.168.1.204
    RTSP Port: 1031 à Forwarded to 192.168.1.203
    RTSP Data Port: NOT SURE IF I NEED TO FORWARD ONE HELP PLEASE
    Despite I have a dedicated subdomain for each camera from TZO, the following link DOESN’T WORK 
    rtsp://CAM4_SubDomain.Linksys-Cam.com/1111, where 1111 is the access code. This feed also brings in CAM1
    DMZ could probably fix the problem for a second camera, but not for all four CAMs
    OS: XP SP2  
    Question 1: Any idea how can I get all the four cameras RTSP feed on my cell/BlackBerry?
    Question 2: I am running out of Port Range forwards. Should I add more port forwards, I have only one more shot. Any workaround? 
    Each and every help idea is greatly appreciated!

    I have six of these cams and used the tutorial and review at http://www.Myhomserver.com for help.  First thing, set ALL the RTSP access codes the SAME, so all you need to do is increment the port for each cam
    Cam 1 - 192.168.1.200 - set at port 80 TCP - RTSP port default at 554, forward port 5000 UDP/TCP and the RTSP access code 12345
    Cam 2 - 192.168.1.201 - set at port 1024 TCP - RTSP port at 1029, forward port 5001 UDP/TCP and the RTSP access code 12345
    Cam 3 - 192.168.1.202 - set at port 1025 TCP - RTSP port at 1030, forward port 5002 UDP/TCP and the RTSP access code 12345
    Cam 4 - 192.168.1.203 - set at port 1026 TCP - RTSP port at 1031, forward port 5003 UDP/TCP and the RTSP access code 12345
    Cam 5 - 192.168.1.204 - set at port 1027 TCP - RTSP port at 1032, forward port 5004 UDP/TCP and the RTSP access code 12345
    Cam 6 - 192.168.1.205 - set at port 1028 TCP - RTSP port at 1033, forward port 5005 UDP/TCP and the RTSP access code 12345
    This worked for me using the above settings....take your time, plan out the ports, all RTSP ports must be different on each cam
    Accessing CAMS can be done via your cell phone below:
    Camera 1---> RTSP://<your TZO camera domain>:554/12345
    Camera 2---> RTSP://<your TZO camera domain>:1029/12345
    Camera 3---> RTSP://<your TZO camera domain>:1030/12345
    Camera 4---> RTSP://<your TZO camera domain>:1031/12345
    Camera 5---> RTSP://<your TZO camera domain>:1032/12345
    Camera 6---> RTSP://<your TZO camera domain>:1033/12345
    http://www.MyHomeServer.com
    Linksys IP camera reviews, Tutorials and How-To's on Web & Mobile Streaming

  • BT Infinity - Port Forwarding and Vodafone Sure Si...

    I have been lucky enough to upgrade from BT Total Broadband (Home Hub 1 and then 2) to BT Infinity (Home Hub 2 with Openreach box). I can remember having major problems with port forwarding with my previous installation, even though the step by step instructions given by BT regarding application sharing was accurate. I resorted to using TELNET and then certain key commands that ensured it did work. A forum simular to this one saved the day. Now I have the new BT Infinity box of tricks and I appear to have the same problem and now I cannot use TELNET to tear down these restrictions. I have switched off the Firewall within the menu system but realise that this is still operational in some kind of way. All incoming data is still being blocked. I need to make sure the following ports are open to the World so that my Vodafone Sure Signal works: TCP: 8 TCP: 50 TCP: 123 UDP: 500 UDP: 4500 I have also enable the VPN clamping as suggested. Can anyone help me? Vodafone can only advise me on these port numbers the rest is ISP driven. Do I need to speak to an engineer? Do I need to TELNET the Home Hub some how? Thank you in advance.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    There is a nationwide problem with Sure Signal connecting through BTinternet which has been ongoing since the 27th. It doesn't seem to be a problem through other internet providers nor does it seem to be specific to any particular versions of Sure Signal or BT Home Hub.
    There's no point trying to talk to BT customer services about it - the idiot I was speaking to yesterday insisted that I needed to change the Wi-Fi channel on my Home Hub in order to get my (wired) Sure Signal working again.
    Vodafone's customer services are not quite as sh*t as BT's but not much more help. They do, at least, acknowledge that there is a problem and that it is being worked on by engineers (not sure if it is Voda or BT engineers?) but can only say that the "hope it is fixed in the next 24 hours."
    If you are thinking of speaking to BT's "customer support specialists" about this, I suggest you poke yourself in the eye instead; it's as likely to fix the problem, will take less time and probably be less painful.

  • Serial interfaces, ip vrf forwarding, and PBR with set vrf

    I am doing some work with VRF-lite but I am having some trouble with serial interfaces. I have a PE router with a serial interface where I want to take incoming traffic and using policy-based routing send the traffic to the appropriate VRF. I want to assign the serial interface itself to be in one of those VRFs, not the global routing table. Eventually, I also want to overlap the VPNs/VRFs to send traffic going out the serial interface through the VRF assigned to the serial interface. Initially, it looks something like this:
    ip vrf VRF1
    rd 65000:3
    route-target export 65000:3
    ip vrf VRF2
    rd 65000:18
    route-target import 65000:3
    ip route vrf VRF1 10.90.51.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.11.18
    interface Serial0/0/0
    ip vrf forwarding VRF1
    ip address 192.168.11.17 255.255.255.252
    router bgp 65000
    no synchronization
    bgp log-neighbor-changes
    no auto-summary
    address-family ipv4 vrf VRF1
    redistribute static
    no auto-summary
    no synchronization
    exit-address-family
    ip access-list extended remote-source
    permit ip 10.90.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
    route-map SERIAL-INCOMING permit 100
    match ip address remote-source
    set vrf VRF2
    But if I try to turn on the policy based routing at the serial interface, I get an error:
    Router(conf)#interface Serial0/0/0
    Router(config-if)#ip policy route-map SERIAL-INCOMING
    % Can not apply route-map SERIAL-INCOMING to this interface
    % Either remove 'set vrf' from route-map or unconfigure 'ip vrf forward'
    I can sort of get around the problem by using an "ip vrf receive" instead of "ip vrf forward", but unfortunately, that leaves my Serial interface in the global table which isn't what I wanted.
    What troubles me is that I can do this without any problems on an Ethernet interface. Are there any known issues with "ip vrf forward" and using PBR and "set vrf" on Serial interfaces, or have I configured something wrong?
    If I stick with the "ip vrf receive", how can I force the physical Serial interface into the appropriate VRF?
    Thanks.
    Clarke Morledge
    College of William and Mary

    Upon further investigation....
    The serial interface issue was a red herring. It just so happens that every other time I've done this it has been on a flavor of 12.2x on a 6500/7600 where this feature is supported. The only systems I have with Serial interfaces are 1841s.
    The problem with the 1841 is that most of the code revisions out there do not support this feature. It was only added to the regular code train with the recent release of 12.2(24)T. I tested with 12.2(24)T1 and you are now able to use "ip vrf forwarding" on all interfaces along with a PBR route-map that uses the "set vrf" option.
    Thanks, Laurent, for pointing me towards the TAC on this.
    Clarke Morledge
    College of William and Mary

Maybe you are looking for

  • When i click on iphone ine. how do i get out of this and sync normally?

    When i click on iphone in itunes it just comes up with option to restore from backup. how do i get out of this and sync normally?

  • Best way to select match on collection of values

    Suppose two tables that are related by a third: TABLE_ONE      one_id NUMBER TABLE_TWO      two_id NUMBER TABLE_THREE      one_id      two_id one_id and two_id are primary keys in their respective tables all combinations of one_id and two_id in TABLE

  • ESS Webdynpro Java - Howto change the calendar

    Hello, i would like to change the shown calendar in the iview "Create new Travel Reqeust". it shows the last 4 months and finishes with the current month. This is not userfriendly, since a user who travels doesn't care about the last months. He is mo

  • OEL Install without CD-ROM

    I'd like to do a fresh install of OEL 5 on an old Toshiba laptop that I no longer have a CD-ROM for. Any suggestions? - Boot over network? Not really sure how to set up the boot agent on the Toshiba. - It has a second hard drive that I could boot fro

  • No Knowledge of ABAP, Can I learn SAP NETWEAVER XI ?

    Dear Friends, I do not have any experience or knowledge about ABAP. Can I learn XI or I MUST definitely learn ABAP first before I proceed to learn XI. Some people at various institutes told me to learn CA- Cross Applications and that would be enough.