Possible Bug/Feature Request with Workspace export routine

I ran into a situation today where my apex database server is dieing and I need to get everything off it fast! I need get every workspace and application on it and to my horror I found no way to mass grab the applications for export. This seems like a natural maintaince thing that you would have the option to export the applications with the workspaces but to my amazement, this was not so. Is there a way I can quickly export every application on the server without going into each workspace and exporting app by app? Also would it be possible to update the workspace export in future versions to give a list of applications within the workspace so you could include an export of those applications with the workspace? Were running 3.1.2 here.

David:
This thread has some information related to your questions
Exporting/Importing a *Bunch* of Applications
Varad

Similar Messages

Possible bug: Saving array with extended and double precision to spreadsheet

If one concatenates a double precision array and an extended precision array with the "build array" vi and then saves using "Write to Spreadsheet File" vi any digits to the right of the decimal place are set to zero in the saved file. This happens regardless of the format signifier input (e.g. %.10f) to the "Write to Spreadsheet File" vi.
I am on Vista Ultimate 32 bit and labview 9.0
This is a possible bug that is easily circumvented by converting to one type before combining arrar to a spreadsheet. Nonetheless, it is a bug and it cost me some time.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
Spreadsheet save bug.vi ‏9 KB

Hi JL,
no, it's not a bug - it's a feature
Well, if you would look more closely you would recognize the "Save to Spreadsheet" as polymorphic VI. As this polymorphic VI doesn't support EXT numbers internally (it only supports DBL, I64 and String) LabVIEW chooses the instance with most accuracy: I64 (I64 has 64 bits precision, DBL only 53...). So your options are:
- set the instance to use as DBL (by right-click and "Select type...")
- make a copy of this VI, save it with a different name and make it support EXT numbers (don't rework the polymorphic VI as you would break compatibility with other LV installations or future revisions)
And yes, those coercion dots always signal some conversions - you should atleast check what's going on there...
Message Edited by GerdW on 05-21-2010 10:01 PM
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome

Trivial bug/feature request

It's sort of a simple thing, but here goes.
In /etc/fstab /dev/cdrom has a default (standard Arch install) filesystem parameter of as iso9660
and /dev/dvd has a default (standard Arch install) filesystem parameter of udf. I'm using thunar-volman and I put a CD in my DVD drive and I got an error about it not being able to be mounted. I just changed the respective filesystems for /dev/dvd and /dev/cdrom to auto and it worked fine (no reboots at all).
IMO, something the default setting for /dev/dvd should be auto, possibly even /dev/cdrom. It's a simple fix, but could it be done when Arch is installed, instead of having the user manually make this change?

It is best to submit feature requests to the bug tracker. Things get lost/overlooked in the forums.

Feature Request // Book Module: Export as indd file and management

Book Module: Export as indd file and management
I would like to request a feature to export a book module as indd file.
I like PDF's but .indd is nice also so we are able to to more in depth layouts.
Having Lightoom being able to manage all your pictures and book layouts would be nice, alot of things can be done in one application.
Another Feature: Using Lightoom as book layout management.
Being able to send a page(s) of the book from lightroom into InDesign to do indepth layout and editing, then being able to send it back into lightroom
Almost similar to how you can send a photo from LR in Photoshop to do indepth editing and then send it back into lightroom.
This could and will ease the workflow of book management and layout design. So lightroom will not only be able to manage photos, but also indesign and book layouts.
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4238530#4238530

Why do repeat it here, as you have already filed a feature request for it?
BTW AFAIK this is already implemented: you can use Adobe Illustrator or InDesign or Opensource Scribus to edit layouts.
They are just not ready to publish how - another sign of the quality processes at Adobe.
But you do not send from the book module.
You create upfront layout templates, which you can import for use inside LR book module.
This is a one-way street.
The book module designers did not acknowledge a use case where you might want to fiddle the exact placement of really chosen images.
It is always you first design a template, then use it.
Love it or leave it - *change it* is not an option that Adobe seems to give to their beta testers.
Cornelia

Feature request - Non-destructive export to Photoshop Touch

It would be pretty nice if we could export .idea files into Photoshop Touch as a layer (like a smart object in Illustrator/Photoshop) and link the file so any future edits would be reflected

Why do repeat it here, as you have already filed a feature request for it?
BTW AFAIK this is already implemented: you can use Adobe Illustrator or InDesign or Opensource Scribus to edit layouts.
They are just not ready to publish how - another sign of the quality processes at Adobe.
But you do not send from the book module.
You create upfront layout templates, which you can import for use inside LR book module.
This is a one-way street.
The book module designers did not acknowledge a use case where you might want to fiddle the exact placement of really chosen images.
It is always you first design a template, then use it.
Love it or leave it - *change it* is not an option that Adobe seems to give to their beta testers.
Cornelia

Bug / Feature request tracker for ROME.

Hi,
Wouldn't it be nice if we have a dedicated site for viewing/tracking Bug and Feature requests?. I hope it will surely help us to remember our past requests and the status of the same.
Thanks,
David R

Hello,
Great suggestion! As the project moves on it might happen that other ways of gathering feedback and requests might be introduced.
Thanks for your idea!
Sarah
Sarah
Forum Moderator

Possible Bug in ID5.5 When Exporting Images to ePub

Just wanted to relate my experience with exporting images to ePub in InDesign CS5.5. I've already spent the better part of two weeks trying to find a resolution for the problem with Adobe's customer service techs in India. Nice guys, but so far not of much help.
Here's the problem. when exporting ID documents to ePub, and you're selecting your options in the "Image" export dialog box, you are offered two choices: "Fixed" and "Relative to Page." In theory, "Relative to Page" is the best choice because this means your images will be automatically scaled for the different viewing devices (i.e. iPad, Kindle, mobile phone, laptop). If you select "Relative to Page," however, your images will export with pixilation.
This may not happen to everyone, but it happened to me, as well as the last tech I spoke in India. I'm using a MacBook Pro running 10.6.7. Don't know what he was using, but he got the same results on his end when exporting an image to ePub using "Relative to Page." For me, the fonts look especially horrible in Adobe Editions. If you select "Fixed," they'll export just fine, (looked great in Adobe Editions and Kindle Previewer), but don't know how fixed size renders in the different devices.
This particular exchange was last Friday. The tech verified that we had a problem he couldn't solve and told me he had to speak with his "senior," who had already gone home for the weekend. I received an email today informing me that all I had to do was select the high quality performance settings in ID, and the image would look "pretty" while the file was open in the program. Really? I mean, duh. What does that have to do with the EXPORT problem?
And yes, I know to select the maximum quality setting in export. I'm a photographer who has used Photoshop since the 1990s. Used InDesign, QuarkXpress, and Pagemaker, in reverse order for that long as well, so I know how to prepare a file for print and the web. The techs I've spoken with have assured me I'm selecting the correct settings. Program has not only been uninstalled and reinstalled, but I went the extra drastic step of wiping my harddrive and starting over. No third-party plug-ins installed that didn't come with the original Adobe software. Have the latest ID update. The problem simply doesn't have a solution in my case.
Oh, well. As I say, nice guys, but this is my third time speaking with tech support about a problem with Adobe software. Not going to try again. IMHO, the customer service system/process could use some work.

As I said, it may not happen to everyone. Perhaps with a different operating platform or system version it may not happen. I was only reporting it because it happened to not just myself, but to the tech half a world away who shared my screen, saw the problem, and recreated it on his own machine/system.
Here are the selections in the ePub Export dialog box that caused the problem. I can't imagine that what is selected for TOC settings or other non-image settings would have to do with it, but here they are.
1. File > Export > Choose ePub as Format
2. In ePub dialog box: General Settings
Include Document Metadata checked
ePub Cover, you can select Rasterize first page or Use Existing Image File, makes no difference
Ordering, Based on Articles Panel
Formatting Options: Leave as Default
3. In ePub dialog box: Image
Preserve Appearance from Layout checked
Resolution, doesn't matter what you select, all produces the same result
Everything in the first section below this is as default
Image Conversion: JPEG (I've been using JPEG, but also tried it with a TIFF, and even a Photoshop file, no difference)
JPEG Options: Maximum, Progressive
Ignore Object Export Settings: I usually have this checked, but have tried it unchecked, and it made no difference
4. In the ePub dialog box: Contents
Format ePub Content: XHTML
Use InDesign TOC Style checked (I've tried the default, and my own TOC style, no difference)
CSS Options: I've tried Generate CSS and Use existing CSS template, never used Styles only. Made no difference
5. Click OK.
If you need what I do from the beginning...
1. New file: Print (not web, which tends to not honor the HTML tags on export). I typically chose 1024 x 768 because that's the screen resolution for an iPad.
2. Command-D, place file. I've tried JPG, TIFF, even Photoshop files of varying resolutions from 72 to 300. Files sizes from 800x600 to 1024x768 to sizes approximately double this. No difference.
3. Drag cover to Articles Panel and name.
4. Layout rest of eBook, etc.
5. Display performance settings while in ID are set to High Quality.
6. Triple check for errors (always a green light before exporting).
These are ePub files that have validated, after fiddling with the CSS and XHTML file, as necessary, of course. I don't mess with any image coding.
That's the steps!

CS5 Bridge & Photo Downloader Bug/Feature Request

Not sure if this is the right place to post this. Hopefully Adobe reads through this forum.
With CS4, my camera download workflow required using Image Capture, DNG Converter, and Bridge. With CS5, I can now perform the same workflow all in Bridge. I love it! Thanks Adobe. There seems to be a couple of bugs though. When importing with the new Photo Downloader, I do a "Rename Files" along with a "Convert To DNG." (part of my workflow has always been to back up the original NEFs and also the converted DNGs. You can never backup too much). Well with CS5, the NEFs get renamed and converted to DNGs but the renamed NEFs disappear. I'm left with the original camera-named NEFs which I then have to rename through Bridge's "Batch Rename" so that I can keep them matched to the DNGs. Adobe, you are missing the "Keep Original Files" for the "Convert to DNG" menu.
Also, the renaming sequence doesn't seem to update itself for the next import like it does in "Batch Rename" (which I always loved).
Anyways, thanks for the Photo Downloader. It saves me several steps.

Well, I have to retract my kudos for the Photo Downloader. I have gone back to my previous workflow of using Image Capture, DNG Converter, and Batch Rename. Photo Downloader has proven to be very unreliable with importing files in sequential order. And its inability to append past numbering is frustrating.

Featured Request with psd layered files

Photoshop Layered files that include alpha channel show the alpha channel visually in aperture thumbnails and previews. They usually look like white or black masks around the subject.
This is a very undesirable feature. What is needed is the ability to ignore the alpha channel. This was done in iView several years ago when I was using that as my database. The software team in iView was able to quickly, in their next version, to add an ignore alpha channel check box, which eliminated seeing the alpha channels.
I hope the aperture team will consider this as a very necessary feature. Layered psd files are just as important as raw files to many photographers. I hate using more then one database to manage my files.
How many of you guys and gals out there are interested in this feature??? I personally consider this a very important feature for many photographers using a database type program like aperture.

Theoretically, yes, but this doesn't actually always work.
Despite Photoshop saving a composite preview, Apple's photoshop-reading routine also reads the alpha channel, and renders an alpha-masked version of the composite in Aperture, Preview, etc. This is true whether the alpha channel is visible/applied in the Photoshop document or not (ie, you can use quickmask to create a selection, save that selection, then have it turned off in your channels pallet, and it'll still get applied as an alpha mask to the complete flattened composite that Adobe provides, by Apple's photoshop/psd reading routines).
The only workaround that I'm aware of for this, is to create an empty alpha mask as the highest-level alpha channel in any document that has alpha channels (visible or not). Select your RGB channels, create a new channel, select it, select all and delete, then drag it to the position directly below the RGB channel set, save, and then Aperture will display the image properly.

Possible bug during logout with Time Machine and File Vault enabled?

I have File Vault enabled on my machines so when I logout from them they do a backup to my Time Capsule.
*I don't login as root!*
Yesterday when I logged of everything was normal in the beginning.
All windows were closed and the progressbar showed up with the backup. Approx: halvway in the backup the finder was showned again.
See image: http://www.liajnad.se/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/leopard-logout.jpg
I couldnt open o terminal window as root but I was able to browse around in the filesystem as root even though I hadn't login as root.
Anyone else seen this problem?

Just to clarify, the new finder that was started had *root privilegies!*

Possible bug in GDM with new user

Hi, I created a user in the system settings app in gnome and I set the password to be set at first login, but now logging out of the current user and trying to login to the new user without the password on gdm I just get nothing where 'create new UNIX password' used to be.
So I cant create a password for a new user from GDM in 3.6 like I could in 3.4. It might be a bug?
To get around this you can obviously just run
passwd 'user'
Is this just me?

It's not just you. You should open a bug report upstream.

Possible bug for emails with a large number of recipients

When receiving emails which was also sent to a large number of people (more than can fit in two lines), it then displays the text 'and 10 more..." or however more there are. Clicking on this text is supposed to then display all the email addresses the email was sent to. However clicking on this is for some reason doing nothing. Is this a bug, or am I the only one having this problem?

When receiving emails which was also sent to a large number of people (more than can fit in two lines), it then displays the text 'and 10 more..." or however more there are. Clicking on this text is supposed to then display all the email addresses the email was sent to. However clicking on this is for some reason doing nothing. Is this a bug, or am I the only one having this problem?

Possible Bug in DI with Gross Profit? Please confirm.

The following works:
1) Add an Inventory Item and set the "Items per Sales Unit" field to "0.1". The "Items per Purchase Unit" is set to "1".
2) Create a goods receipt for 1 purchase unit.
3) Create an A/R invoice for 1 unit.
This should add a line item for 0.1 inventory units and set the price to 0.1 * <itemprice> which it does.
4) Click on the Gross Profit money bag and everything displays correctly. The journal entry for COGS is also correct.
What doesn't work:
If you try the above using the DI API then the journal entry for COGS is correct, but when you find the A/R invoice and click the gross profit money bag then it shows that you sold the item at a loss since it uses the full purchase price unit vs the partial sales unit.
If you then go an manually add an A/R invoice for the item added through DI API then gross profit calculates correctly.
There seems to be a problem with the gross profit when you add the invoice through DI API. Is there a parameter when adding SO or AR Invoices that I could be missing?
System Info:
SBO 2005 A (6.80.123)
SQL Server
Document Settings > Base Price Origin set to Item Cost

More information:
After further research I found that the DI API is setting the unit to the Sales Unit (which is correct), but it sets the price to the Inventory Unit price.
When I set the price via the DI API to what it should be then the discount column was set to 90%.
Is this by design? If so, what do I need to do to correct this problem?

Feature Request: Add Remaining Export Options To createKeyword method.

At present, there is:
- includeOnExport
But whats missing is:
- Export Containing Keywords
- Export Synonyms
(I'm talking about the catalog method for creating a keyword)
This functionality would allow plugins that include creating keywords to offer all the same options as Lightroom proper.
Rob

Hi,
it would be great if you included drop scripts for the generated triggers as well.
Thanks in advance.

Feature Request - Book Module export to jpgs!

So dissapointed that you can't export the books to anything but blurb (not really a pro photographer solution!) or PDF. My lab doesn't take PDFs, so I have to convert everything to jpg from PDF. Kind of a workflow killer

Ditto. I just spent an hour trying to find either another source for books that accepts pdfs, or to get LR4 to produce a jpeg. Both failed.
In order for the book section to be useful to professionals, it needs to output high resolution jpegs.

Possible Bug/Feature Request with Workspace export routine

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for