Possible to obtain higher video quality in Theatre mode?

Hi,
is it possible to somehow raised the quality when sharing (ie Keynote) in the Theatre mode?
Sincerely,
Andreas

There is no adjustment
10:48 PM Thursday; August 7, 2008

Similar Messages

Bitrate video Quality

Hello, I'm broadcasting live video using FMS , what bitrate should I use to broadcast in low or medium or high video quality, I'm using this AS3 code:
camera.setMode(250, 180, 15, false);
camera.setQuality(350, 50);
camera.setKeyFrameInterval(30);
microphone.rate = 11;
microphone.setSilenceLevel(0);
Thanks

There is a tutorial on the proper settings for AC3 encoding at; http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/a_packwarmouth.html
The tutorial is on A.Pack, which has been since folded into Compressor, but the settings are the same. If its done right, the ac3 file will sound identical to the PCM file.
BTW when you provided audio samples for the client to listen to did you tell them, "This is the compressed ac3 file, and this is the PCM file." Or did you correctly tell them, "Listen to these two files, sample A and sample B, and tell me which sounds better, or do they sound the same." And obviously you cannot have them look at the files because one will be significantly smaller than the other.

Apple tv video quality vs hd tv and high def dvd's

ok...i know it supports 1080i, but does the video quality of video in itunes really look good compared against say a blu-ray disc, or hdtv signals? i'm sure it will get better (with a hardware or software upgrade?) if its not close to high def quality but want to know what i'm in store for if i buy appletv now...thanks. PS: i currently have directv HD and a ps3 for blu-ray, and my tv's are all HD...

Based on my own testing, the distinctions between an HD-DVD movie (which are true 1080) and an Apple TV video converted as its own maximum settings (which is 720) is actually quite noticeable if you have a 1080 TV set, but at the same I don't consider it a show-stopper. I watch a lot of HD broadcast content that's only 720p, and it's still very good.
An HD-DVD or Blu-Ray DVD will normally be in 1920 x 1080 resolution (1080p or 1080i, generally depending on your equipment). The Apple TV's maximum resolution is 1280 x 720 (basically 720p). Therefore, even an original HD-DVD or Blu-Ray DVD converted to Apple TV will need to be scaled down to 720p for display on the Apple TV.
Further, Elgato EyeTV actually scales these down somewhat lower, so HDTV recorded content could be even worse-off, depending on the original source. The standard Apple TV export settings use a 960 x 540 frame in order to keep the bit-rate and frame rate within tolerances (since a 720p signal is approximately 60fps, and the bitrates will generally exceed 5-6 mbps, which pushes the limits of the Apple TV).
Even more interestingly, Elgato's new turbo.264 dongle will only encode in "Apple TV" format at a maximum resolution of 800 x 600 (and if you do the math you will realize that this will be considerably less for a 16:9 aspect ratio video).
The result is that videos converted from an EyeTV Hybrid are technically much worse off on the Apple TV than viewing the original source material. Whether this is significant enough to be noticeable will depend on your output medium, but on my 62" DLP, the difference is quite apparent (although still far superior to an SDTV signal).
You can get 1280 x 720 content to play back at 60fps at 5mbps bit-rates on the Apple TV by using ffmpeg-based encoders and manually selecting higher settings, although it's been hit-and-miss in my own testing, and of course it creates gargantuan files. Elgato and others have obviously tried to stay with the more conservative settings to ensure that they can guarantee the broadcast possible range of support.
In fact, although most of the standard encoder settings max out at 2.5-3.0 mbps, I've successfully pushed up to 6 mbps through the Apple TV, although such content has to be synced rather than streamed, since even an 802.11n network has a hard time keeping up (it worked, but there were some drop-outs and glitches in the process). Of course, 6mbps content is going to fill up the Apple TV hard drive pretty quickly as well (you'd only be able to fit around 11 hours on the internal 40GB hard drive).
The other thing to keep in mind with DVD movies is that they come from film, which is a 24fps source (based on the physical nature of film). As a result, the distinctions between a 720p and 1080i signal are less prevalant when dealing with film content, since you won't get the full 60fps HDTV capabilities anyway. Interlacing can still create some nasty side-effects, but it's far less of an issue when you're dealing with less than half of the normal frames.
In my own experiences, I have an Apple TV that is connected to a 1080p upscaling DLP TV (native 1080i input, internalized de-interlacing), and a second Apple TV that is connected to a 720p LCD TV. With the first Apple TV, I can notice the difference between 720p and 1080i output settings only when viewing photos, since the remainder of the standard content doesn't exceed 720p anyway. Further, because my TV de-interlaces a 1080i signal to 1080p, I don't get the flicker that is normally associated with a 1080i signal.
On the second Apple TV, I leave the setting to 720p, since that's the native resolution of the second TV, and I get noticeable interlacing-based flickering on the 1080i, particularly with photo slideshows (mostly in the transitions).

Is it possible to embed VIMEO videos in HD QUALITY?

Is it possible to embed VIMEO videos in HD QUALITY?
I'm trying to embed in Adobe Muse a few videos taken from my Vimeo account. but the quality in Muse seems poor, compared to the original Vimeo quality, which is HD.
if I click on "HD", in Muse, it says "sorry HD not available here".
anyone can help?
thanks

well, problem solved, got vimeo plus (50$ per year) HD ok in embedded videos.

Is it possible to sort / group movies by video quality?

I'd like to sort or group my movies by video quality. I am not sure if it's possible in iTunes -- if it is, I certainly can't figure it out.
I can certainly see the info when I click "Get Info" on individual films, but I don't see a way to sort or create a smart playlist with such info.
Can I do this, or is it just a dream?
(I'm on iTunes 11. Up-to-date.)

Thanks for the info. I'm specifically interested in splitting 1080 and 720 HD movies, so I'm probably better off just creating non-smart playlists and dropping the movies in each accordingly, as it probably requires as many steps as editing the tags for each film.

Video quality as low/high/HD

How to provide a video quality as Low, Medium, High and HD in flash actionscript. Thanks in advance..

Usually when discussing video quality, the "quality" is more or less a measurement of the amount of data that needs to continually flow into the video player to provide an uninterrupted display of the video. This is the video "bitrate".
So to provide 3 different "quality" videos, you need to provide 3 different video files, each rendered at a different bitrate (or displayed at different dimensions... see discussion below).
For example
Low: 400kbps
Medium: 1000kbps
High: 2500kbps
There is really nothing Actionscript can do to produce any of those. Controlling the bitrate is done in the video editing or transcoding software. Then you could create controls or buttons in actionscript to select between the separate video files.
More about video bitrate from this old post:
Video bit rate
One of the principle of goal setting is to "Begin with the end in mind". In this case it'll be very hard to give good recommendations because the end is not defined. So I'll just make a few assumptions and you can correct me as needed.
First, I'll assume that since you are converting to Flash, you want to deliver this video over the Internet. If that's true, then we'll have to make some assumptions on the Internet connection download speeds of your potential viewers. Let's just say that most have at least a 1.5Mb connection or faster.
OK, that would mean that a video bitrate of half that should usually provide a video download that is not interupped by buffering (most of the time anyway). So assuming a video bitrate of 750kbps, what would the optimum display dimensions be?
Before we decide, here's a little info about bitrate. For highest quality playback, the video bitrate is tied directly to the display dimensions. That is, the larger the display, the more incoming data is required to properly display the video. Think of bitrate in terms of a can of paint. If you have 1 quart of paint, you might be able to do a very nice job on a 32 X 24 foot area. But if you try to stretch that same amount of paint out over a 64 X 48 foot area, the coverage will not be nearly as good and you get poor results.
In the same way, a video displayed at 640 X 480 pixels will require 4 times the bitrate as a video displayed at 320 X 240 pixels to produce the same quality. So for example a video with a bitrate of 100kbps, displayed at 160 X 120 will produce the same quality results as a video with a bitrate of 1600kbps if displayed at 640 X 480.
So to boil it all down, video bitrates of 750kbps, even up to 1000kbps can usually get delivered of the Internet on most high speed connections. Higher bit rates may work for really fast connections but will cause problems for viewers with slower connections. Video display size has a direct bearing on the final quality. In the 750 to 1000kbps range, display size should be kept around 450 or 500 width max (and whatever height the aspect ratio calls for). Yes it can be displayed larger, but the quality will suffer.
Sound like your audio settings are fine, especially for Internet delivery.
As for framerate, maintain the original raw video framerate for best results. So if the video was shot at 24fps, leave it.
As for video converters, do you have the Flash 8 Video Converter? It works just fine for video to be delivered over the Internet. Remember, you are taking a Cadillac version of video (h.264 HD) and stuffing it into a Chevy body to get it to work over the Internet.
Best wishes,
Adninjastrator

Why is the video quality for AVCHD when uploaded to youtube higher...

when submitted from a mac?
#1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8d-fQxdBmQ
I sent this video directly from my Macbook using iMovie 8.0 and that's the video quality results
#2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U3dDmAX7C0
I uploaded this using Adobe Premirere Pro CS 4 H.264 - youtube HD widescreen preset and those were the results...?
Why?

"I suspect you simply didnt wait long enough for youtube to fully process the video before you watched it."
Incorrect. After I uploaded the second video, I went to sleep, without watching it once.
So if I set the 2nd video to low resolution, would it end up looking like the first video? Because I still think the first video has better quality.

Video Bitrate too high, even reducing video quality

I'm having difficulties on building a DVD9 that I need to send to the factory.
Even though I reduced the video quality from 6.6 to 6.4, the problem still happens.
Does anybody have any idea of how to make this thing build, without converting the 2.0 audio to .ac3?
Is the problem, anyhow related to the Max Bitrate, on VBR?
If yes, using a 6.5Mbps CBR will my problem be solved? The quality of the video will be harmed? How bad?
Here are the specifications:
Space occupied: 7.3 GB
Main video:
Duration: 85'
Encode: mpeg2 One pass VBR
Average Bitrate: 6.4Mbps
Max Bitrate: 7.5Mbps
Audio: 2.0 PCM
5.1 Dolby .ac3
Making of:
Duration: 15'
Encode: mpeg2 One pass VBR
Average Bitrate: 6.3Mbps
Max Bitrate: 7.4Mbps
Audio: 2.0 PCM
Menus
3 motion Menus with .ac3 audio
3 static Menus with .ac3 audio

There is a tutorial on the proper settings for AC3 encoding at; http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/a_packwarmouth.html
The tutorial is on A.Pack, which has been since folded into Compressor, but the settings are the same. If its done right, the ac3 file will sound identical to the PCM file.
BTW when you provided audio samples for the client to listen to did you tell them, "This is the compressed ac3 file, and this is the PCM file." Or did you correctly tell them, "Listen to these two files, sample A and sample B, and tell me which sounds better, or do they sound the same." And obviously you cannot have them look at the files because one will be significantly smaller than the other.

Video Quality worse in new version?

Ok, so I had the settings down pat in the last version of imovie and idvd. I imported my miniDV footage in widescreen format into iMove and then ported it over to iDVD. I used to use the "Best Quality" feature in the last version but changed it to "Professional Quality" in '08 because it should be the better choice. However the video looks bad. Edges of furniture and stuff are jagged and color variations are terrible.
Anyone know of other settings I could check? The camera and everything is the same but the new version of iLife has my videos looking bad now.

iMovie version 7.1 (506) all updates applied.
Using a Panasonic PV-GS300 Mini DV Camcorder.
I plug it into the computer using the firewire cable and iMovie comes up asking to import. I click import and it does it's thing. I edit it and get it ready to go.
Here's where it gets interesting....I use the share to media browser feature and choose large (the highest quality option I can choose as far as I know). It says 960x540 and I don't know if it's possible to export higher?
It then gets plugged into iDVD '08 (all updates applied) and I'm setting the encoding at "Professional Quality". Burn it and play it where I've decided it's worse than before in the last version of iLife.
I have a brand new 24" iMac and it has better specs than my last iMac. Any ideas?

Importing mpeg2 and video quality of final DVD

I had a company create an mpeg2 file from a master for a dvd project I'm authoring. I'm not sure what format the master is on, I'm guessing BetaSP but it is something other than a DV format which is all I can handle. When my client saw the finished DVD I authored he was unhappy with the video quality, it is noisy/grainy. I told him I that is how I received it from this company (the company houses all of my client's masters) but he said his master was of higher quality. So we asked the company what the deal was and they are telling me these two things, both of which I don't believe.
My client had sent them the check disc (an authored dvd) I sent him and I sent the mpeg2 file back to them. They claim that the video quality is worse on the check disc because when you author a DVD it transcodes the files when it creates the vob files. Now the mpeg2 file imported into Encore fine and Encore defaulted to it being "do not transcode". So encore as far as I know definitely did no transcoding. Is there any validity to what they are saying? I don't think so.
They also claim that for optimum video quality I should've requested the master be transfered to DVCAM (dvcam I can indeed handle). So they are saying going from the master to dvcam to mpeg2 would be better than going from master to mpeg2. That makes no sense to me. If the master is DigiBeta, going from digibeta to the lesser quality dvcam and then to mpeg is the best route? Now way right? It seems to me that THEIR mpeg2 encoder just isn't any good.
Any thoughts would be appreciated (so I can argue my case).
thanks
Ryan

I agree with Joe.
DVCAM from DigiBeta is no quality increase at all. If anything (depending on the digibeta) you're dropping quality. You're certainly not gaining anything.
Correct workflow for DVD Authoring with DigiBeta masters is as follows:
1 - Transfer from DigiBeta to NLE Workstation.
2 - Edit as required
3 - Export from workstation to final version*
4 - Create DVD - and the biggest difference is going to be what is used - and
i how
it is used - to do the MPEG-2 encoding that the DVD application will require. MPEG encoding is not a matter of bashing out a PRESET from a menu. That will
i never
give the highest quality. MPEG encoding is every bit as much an art form as the shooting, cutting & producing of the film in the first place, and is a skill that takes both time & experience to learn properly.
NB.
* = This has been a bone of contention for a while now. It is often recommended to go to DV AVI as the interim format, but for absolute highest possible quality, this is not really true as DV AVI (DVCAM) is a compressed form, albeit lightly. Some prefer a more filmic look to their footage (which DV will never give you).
It's all swings & roundabouts. The final Master (for us) is usually a 10 bit Blackmagic type file, or an uncompressed AVI file. Expect to see around 40Gb/hour in this form, even more with a 10 bit file. Does going to 10 bits make a difference? As long as you do not have your NLE set to 8 bits, you bet it does!

60p vs 60i video quality

Sorry for asking a very common question but every thread I've searched tends to go down a tangent that doesn't quite answer my question.
I have a Panasonic camcorder that records in 1080 60p or 60i.
My question is video quality. Even though all my output is going to be turned into 30 fps for Apple TV viewing or 30i for YouTube distribution, is my video quality going to be higher, shooting in 60p with a data rate of 34 MB/s vs 60i at 17 MB/s whether the subject is fast moving or not. My thought is to shoot in 60p at the higher data rate even though it will be converted to 30 fps and possible even interlaced for youtube, due to I am dealing with full frames, not interlaced frames and at a higher data rate. Is my logic correct?
I know the file size is doubled shooting in 60p vs 60i, but if the video quality is higher, then I am willing to make that sacrafic.
I guess a follow up question would be, how does FCP convert 60p video into 30i video.
Thanks for your help.

Avoid shooting interlaced videos!
I work in the entertainment industry and only shoot 60p to be displayed at 60fps for maximum smoothness - not for slow-motion playback.
Shooting 24p or 30p: 1/60sec or slower shutter speeds must be used to introduce motion blur to lessen, not eliminate, the choppy appearance. Shooting with slow shutter speeds under bright sunlight, ND filters are required to control depth of field and to prevent sensor dusts from showing up prominently at F11 on up.
60p: Since 60fps videos will turn out smooth even with shutter set well above 1/60sec, Aperture Priority can be used to control depth of field under bright sunlight without an absolute need for ND filters. Filmmakers - James Cameron, Peter Jackson, and George Lucas - have all produced 60-frame-per-second projects when they are not required to shoot 24fps - Avatar 2 & 3, King Kong Universal attraction, and Star Wars Star Tours attraction - because they believe 60fps delivers a more lifelike and immersive experience.
Once again - avoid shooting interlaced videos!

Video Quality is Degrading

I frequently iChat with my son in another state. Neither of us has changed any settings, but lately the video quality on his end has degraded. Specifically, the lighting behind him has gotten brighter, as if the camera aperture has widened. Is it possible that some light sensor is wearing out? Is there anything we can do (short of changing the entire room configuration to eliminate any light source behind him) to fix this?

badfan wrote:
I frequently iChat with my son in another state. Neither of us has changed any settings, but lately the video quality on his end has degraded. Specifically, the lighting behind him has gotten brighter, as if the camera aperture has widened. Is it possible that some light sensor is wearing out?
I do not think this is possible if he is using a built-in iSight. Lighting for built-in iSight is controlled by software rather than an adjustable camera aperture. However, an Apple-Authorized Service Provider has the necessary tools, test equipment, and technical data needed to check for possible sensor problems.
Your son should test whether other users notice the same problem in his iChat video. If others do not see the same problem you note, the trouble may be at your end.
If the problem is noted by everyone who does video iChat with your son, consider whether the changing light might be due to seasonal changes in the room your son uses. If that is a possibility, and if your son cannot reduce the amount of light coming in through doors or windows, he can try to make his room more evenly lighted by adding more light to the room.
Is there anything we can do (short of changing the entire room configuration to eliminate any light source behind him) to fix this?
(1) A single good light source in a well-lit room gives the picture in iChat. For more info, see:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3097
(2) Your son can test his iSight to see if it needs service by using all relevant suggestions here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2090
Be sure to check more than one app in more than one user account.
(3) iChat is part of Mac OS X. Consider the possibility that system softwares needs to be updated. Both of you should be using the latest available software for the OS X version you use.
I see your posted info shows that you are using Mac OS X (10.4.9). Unless you have complelling reason for doing so, you should update to the latest version of Tiger to obtain its many improvements. Which you use depends on the processor in your iMac:
For iNtel Mac: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL172
For PPC iMac: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL170
If your son uses Leopard (10.5.x), use this combo updater:
http://support.apple.com/kb/DL866
If your son uses Snow Leopard (10.6.x), use this combo updater:
http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1048
Regardless of which combo update you or your son apply, use the Mac's Disk Utility to repair permissions immediately *before _and again_ after* applying the update.
EZ Jim
Mac Pro Quad Core (Early 2009) 2.93Ghz w/Mac OS X (10.6.4) MacBook Pro (13 inch, Mid 2009) 2.26GHz (10.6.4)
LED Cinema Display G4 PowerBook 1.67GHz (10.4.11) iBookSE 366MHz (10.3.9) External iSight

"Shared" Video quality disappointing

When I use iM to share even full quality .DV video from my iM project I get a lower quality video! It appears to be somewhat "pixelated" especially with horizontal lines during even the slightest motion.
And when I export to .mpg or .mov formats the video is very pixelated when compared to videos of similar compression and size in the same format, what gives?
Would QTpro solve these quality problems?
TIA
-Tim
eMac Mac OS X (10.4.6) 1.25ghz 1gb superdrive

.dv is a format meant for being displayed on TVs:
640x480/interlaced.. a computer has a different
concept of displaying "video"/content... a much
higher res, no interlacing (and diff. colors, etc)
I actually just "shared", "QuickTime" (tab) in "full quality" from iM, then viewed in QT. No change in view size, did see significant loss of picture quality, as described.
Believe me I am NOT blaming my MAC!!
watching an iM project on a Mac fullscreen results in
a "blow up" =>loss of quality
and:
QTplayer is by default set to "best performance" not
"high quality" (in QTpro: -J,
video/quality/checkbox...)
Don't have QT-pro (had it in QT6, on a different MAC, since sold)
so, DO NOT judge pic quality on your Mac!
playout to tape/watch on telly; or use the "live
playout" feature of iM via fw connected camcorder +
TV....
Believe me I am NOT blaming my MAC!!, Just looking to make videos of comparable quality and of comparable size to .mpg I see on web. There must be a way, and my iMovie doesn't seem to do it right now.
the dv exported by iM are in highest possible
quality... don't worry
...And when I export to .mpg...
iM/QT does not support export to .mpg ... how/with
what app did you generate these files?
I "shared" to quicktime, "expert settings", movie to Divx, and mpeg-4, the ipod setting .m4v seemd pretty good, but obviously small, and larger file than comparable video (in size and length) to other .m4v for ipod I have found.
I also have used the .dv files with ffmpeg, and I still cannot match the quality of similar viseos made by others without a MUCH larger file.
Any Suggestions?

How do I get good video quality?

I can't seem to get more then 20 fps and not so hot video out of iChat AV. With what should be pretty good connections, I still get stopping or pixelation at times, so I've been trying to isolate the issue.
Conferencing over an airport on an in-house system for a test, with 2.4 megs of pipe (showing in Connection Doctor; other tests show 10 megs up and down) using either iSight or a DV camera, I get 20 fps, no more. OS 10.5.3 on both sides, Quicktime 7.5 on both sides. Intel Duo 2Ghz with 1 Ghz ram on one side, G5 with 5 gigs of ram on the other. One way video chat. No other apps running. No other traffic on the Airport.
We're trying to use this for student "live shots" over the internet. The quality of the video frankly used to be a lot higher with earlier versions.
I don't get it. If it is possible to get 640 X 480, 30 fps out of this, I can't figure it out. Hopefully, one of you will know how to do it. Do I need to install Quicktime Pro? Is there some magic button or setting somewhere? (yes, i is set on LAN) Do I use another application that has low latency like iChat AV but better video quality? Is there an appliance that will do this better? Is there a way to set up a point to point conference? (Quicktime Broadcaster allows this, but has long latency... too long to be usable for our purposes.)
So I'm not getting why I can't do this. Please let me know if you have any ideas.

Ralph,
Thanks. I've increased the RAM size on both sides, have a blazing fast connection, and use prosumer cameras with good glass and lighting. The boxes on both ends are dedicated to this with nothing else running. I've even met with our campus IT lines to make sure there are blocks or plugs on ports. No good.
I guess its in the CPU or something. It's a bit annoying. I'm a really big fan of iChat. We've used it for "live shots" on election night and as broadband field "live shots" over a 3G telephony connection and wireless broadband. Nothing else we've found is better. It just seems to handle video quality less well in the last couple of versions.
If anyone knows the magic formula.... X- machine, X-plug in, X-external box, X-side processor, I'm interested.
Thanks for your suggestions.
David

QUALITY - .MOVs to Encore, but video quality horrible -- DVD

Hello,
I am a newbie to Encore and video processing, alike - I'm hoping that someone can enlighten me in the ways of High Definition/working with conversion to DVD in Encore.
I'm currently working on making a DVD with a main menu which links to a main feature, Previews, Contact screen and chapters. All of the items for these categories were originally .SWFs and have been converted to .MOVs (using the Moyea SWF to Video pluggin). Not sure if that makes a difference, but the DVD has been completed without any problems, works well in the preview, comes out in the specified 16:9 ratio and links properly. Here is where I feel like I'm walking around in smoke: I would like to build to DVD so that it can be viewed on the Computer as well as TV. But I really want High grade quality video. It seems to me that their was a slight loss of quality from .Swf to .MOV, so I've tried experimenting with everything from the Encore Settings, reading numerous posts on this site and using different conversion formats (MOV, AVI and VOB). I loved the quality when I took the .SWFs to .VOB (however Encore still transcoded and in the end I lost the amazing clarity). After building, when I play the DVD on the computer the quality is a bit hazey (even exchanging the .VOBs for .MOVs.) As of now, my setting are as follows:
PROJECT TRANSCODE PRESETS:
MPEG2-DVD
High quality, VBR transcoding for progressive-frame content (max bit rate =9)
25 fps (the .swfs were built at 24 fps - does this matter?)
quality 5.0
192 kbps, 48kHz, Dolby Digital
VBR, 2 Pass, Min 1.50, target 7.00, Max. 9.00 mbps
Field order: none (progressive
16:9
min bitrate: 1.5
target bitrate: 7
Max bitrate: 9
M frames: 3
N Frames: 12
Video Noise Reduction has been checked and pushed to 100
Deinterlaced was also checked
(what am I doing wrong?)
Right now, I'm so determined to get the best quality - So, I've begun exporting the entire Encore project to .SWF to see if this will do the trick. In the meantime, how can I build to DVD with the highest quality possible?
Than you all in advance.
AC

This is correct, the .swf/.flv files are so compressed that you will only retain the quality of the origional file at best. I've tried this for months and about a Terabyte of files and have found only 1 way to get a good quality DVD from an .flv/.swf.
Connect 1 computer to a TV to play the .swf/.flv. Connect the out connector from the TV to another computer with Premiere installed via the graphics card and then capture the video as it is playing in premiere in the highest quality you can. This can make 30 minutes of compressed .swf into a 10+GB DVD video file. Then after capture, edit and send/export to Encore, make your DVD and then encode like normal.
This has been the highest quality DVD from .swf/.flv that I have been able to achieve.

Possible to obtain higher video quality in Theatre mode?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for