Possible to sort No object table's records?

Hi,
Is it possible to sort the records of No object table that is accessible by clicking Tools-User tables?
by default, it sorts on the basis of the 'code' column but, since it is of character type, the sorting is not numerically correct. it sorts like 1,10,11,12,....19, 2,20,...and so on.
thanks and regards,
Binita Joshi

Hi Binita,
i know this problem and its weird - you can't sort it.
thats why i generate codes always with 0 before - than it is sorted.
like
00001
00002
00011
that's how iam doing.
lg David

Similar Messages

Deleting/Updating records from an object table in PL/SQL

Hello All,
VER:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE     11.2.0.3.0     Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
I have created an object and inserted records in it. Is there any way we can delete/update records from it. I do not want to delete based on iteration like delete.collection but I would like to know if we can delete directly from obj like delete from table...
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE test_type AS OBJECT
col1 number,
col2 varchar2(100)
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE tab_type is table of test_type;
DECLARE
test_tab tab_type;
l_cnt NUMBER;
BEGIN
select test_type(col1,col2) bulk collect
into test_tab from (select 1 as col1,'test1' as col2 from dual
                    union all
                    select 2,'test2' from dual);
IF test_tab.count>0
THEN
DELETE FROM TABLE(CAST(test_tab as tab_type)) a
where a.col1=1;
END IF;
l_cnt := test_tab.count;
END;Thx
Shank.

SB,
I have a scenario wherein I insert few records into a collection table. I'm gonna filter few records from collection table based on the filter.
I want to delete the records that didn't match the filter. Right now, I'm inserting the records into a physical table and deleting from there. I do no want to use a physical table. Trying to avoid it.
Would like to delete from collection itself.
DELETE FROM TABLE(CAST(lv_attr_filter_tab as EDMS_CSPP_DISC_REQ_TAB_TYPE))
                             WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
                                   FROM edms_disc_lines_stg edls
                                   WHERE edls.req_id = edrg.request_id
                                      AND edls.disc_line_id = edrg.discount_id
                                      AND UPPER(edls.disc_status) IN ('ACTIVE');

Is it possible to get the updated table records based on date & time.

Is it possible to get the updated table records based on date & time in oracle.
Thanks in advance.

no, actually i am asking update records using 'UPDATE
or DELETE' statement, but not insert statement.
Is it possible?
I think we can do using trigger on table, but problem
is if i am having 20 tables means i have to write 20
trigger. i don't want like this.Of course it's still possible, typically you'll find applications with a column LAST_UPDATE, probably a LAST_UPDATED_BY and so on column. You don't say what your business need is, if you just want a one of query of updates to particular records and have a recent version of Oracle, then flashback query may well help, if you want to record update timestamps you either have to modify the table, or write some code to store your updates in an audit table somewhere.
Niall Litchfield
http://www.orawin.info/

Need some input on comparision btw sorted and std table.

Hi,
Just a small comparision on using standard table, sorted table, and sorted table using index in a loop with where conditions.
I just ran this report to find out the time taken and it is quite surprising. Case 3 of the program is quite faster than case2 and of course very fast than case1. any inputs on how this is possible???
output value :
try 1: 674, 192, 147 for 100 entries.
try 2: 603, 53 , 6 for 20 entries.
*C-- Small report to compare sorted and standard table.
REPORT zloopcompare.
TYPES : BEGIN OF tp_marc,
          werks TYPE marc-werks,
          matnr TYPE marc-matnr,
        END OF tp_marc.
DATA : t_marc TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tp_marc.
DATA : t_marc1 TYPE SORTED TABLE OF tp_marc
WITH NON-UNIQUE KEY werks matnr.
DATA : wa_marc TYPE tp_marc.
DATA : p1 TYPE i,
       p2 TYPE i.
DATA : l_tabix TYPE sy-tabix.
DATA : count TYPE i.
PARAMETERS : p_werks TYPE marc-werks OBLIGATORY.
SELECT werks matnr FROM marc
INTO TABLE t_marc1
UP TO 1000 ROWS.
t_marc[] = t_marc1[].
*Case1 - standard table with where condition.
GET RUN TIME FIELD p1.
LOOP AT t_marc INTO wa_marc
WHERE werks EQ p_werks.
ENDLOOP.
GET RUN TIME FIELD p2.
p2 = p2 - p1.
WRITE : / p2.
*Case2- sorted table sorted as per the where condition.
GET RUN TIME FIELD p1.
LOOP AT t_marc1 INTO wa_marc
WHERE werks EQ p_werks.
ENDLOOP.
GET RUN TIME FIELD p2.
p2 = p2 - p1.
WRITE : / p2.
*Case3- using index to get faster access.
GET RUN TIME FIELD p1.
READ TABLE t_marc1 INTO wa_marc WITH KEY werks = p_werks.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
l_tabix = sy-tabix + 1.
LOOP AT t_marc1 INTO wa_marc FROM l_tabix.
    IF wa_marc-werks NE p_werks.
      EXIT.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
GET RUN TIME FIELD p2.
p2 = p2 - p1.
WRITE : / p2.

HI sharath,
I just checked and executed the code :
1. case 1 and 2 are fine.
2. but 3 is not what u desire.
<b>(in fact its not looping at all)</b>
3. the code in case 3 is :
IF wa_marc-werks NE p_werks.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
So the loop goes inside ONLY ONCE,
and so, hence, its LIGHTNING FAST.
Please note that READ TABLE reads only
1 record.
4. ***************
Instead of NE
write this, and u will see that its not so fast.
<b>IF wa_marc-werks = p_werks.</b>
EXIT.
ENDIF.
regards,
amit m.

Table of records from a stored procedure

Hi
Where could I find an example or documentation about how to retrive a table of records from a Stored Procedure ??
Thanks

Try:
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE scott.MYRECORDTYPE as object
(a int, b varchar2(40), c date, d number(10));
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE scott.MYTABLETYPE is table of myrecordtype;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY scott.MYPACKAGE
as
type number_collection is table of number(38) index by binary_integer;
type varchar2_collection is table of varchar2(4000) index by binary_integer;
type date_collection is table of date index by binary_integer;
g_data myTableType;
empno_col number_collection;
ename_col varchar2_collection;
hiredate_col date_collection;
mgr_col number_collection;
function my_function return myTableType
is
begin
select empno, ename, hiredate, mgr
bulk collect into empno_col, ename_col, hiredate_col, mgr_col
from emp
order by empno; -- Get some data
g_data := myTableType(); -- Initialize
for i in empno_col.first .. empno_col.last loop
g_data.extend; -- Write something in the array
g_data(i) := myRecordtype(empno_col(i), ename_col(i), hiredate_col(i), mgr_col(i));
end loop;
return g_data;
end;
end;
-- Demonstration-View
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW scott.myview
AS
select a,b,c,d
from table(cast(myPackage.my_function() as mytabletype));

Is it possible to name the results table.

Hi, I'm new to java and have hit a brick wall devloping a GUI which access a SAPDB database.
They layout of the GUI is:
have a awt lists in card layout, which is populated with the results of a SQL query to table REGION.
However the number of results returned can be greater then 1Mill. To minimise the mem useage, i'm using the ResultSet absolute(), first() etc methods to collect and display small chunks of the data, for the different card in the gui. This works fine :)
However, the user is able to select an item from the list to perform a new query, which the results a presented in a dialog box, not dependent on the parent frame. Works :)
But, when the user (I) try to move anothe card in the parent frame I get this error:
SAP DBTech JDBC: Object is closed
com.sap.dbtech.jdbc.exceptions.ObjectIsClosedException: SAP DBTech JDBC: Object is closed
at com.sap.dbtech.jdbc.ConnectionItem.assertOpen(ConnectionItem.java:54)
at com.sap.dbtech.jdbc.ResultSetSapDB.beforeFirst(ResultSetSapDB.java:177)
at blastDb.Table.getResultSetSize(Table.java:205)
at blastDb.Table.setCursor(Table.java:227)
at ViewDatabase$RegionPanel.setRegionList(ViewDatabase.java:354)
at ViewDatabase$TabPanel.showRegionList(ViewDatabase.java:180)
at ViewDatabase$TabButtonListener.actionPerformed(ViewDatabase.java:289)
at java.awt.Button.processActionEvent(Button.java:381)
at java.awt.Button.processEvent(Button.java:350)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:3526)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3367)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:445)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:191)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:144)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:138)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:130)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:98)
After some reading I have come up with this hypothesis:
In the parent frame there is the object (class) RegionTable, which contains the ResultSet (rsR) of the sql query generated by it.
In the dialog box there is the object (class) ProteinTable which also contains the ResultsSet (rsP) of the sql query generated by it.
So when RegionTable querys the database the rsR points to the results table in the SAPDB. All good.
However when ProteinTable querys the database, rsR closes and rsP is valid ie. points to the results table in the SAPDB.
Thus after the second query RegionTable.rsR is unable to collect the results of its query. BAD :(
From what i have read, if the results table is named for the first query, the second call which results table is named something diff then rsR will not close, as the results table is not destroyed, thus rsR can read it's results after the second qury.
This problems occours when the objects share the same connection or diff connections.
As far as I'm aware i'm using JDBC 1.2 drivers and SAPDB latest build.
I know i could hold the results in a view, but that requies more coding, being able to name the results table in the SAPDB make it alot easier.
So my question is:
1. Are my assumptions correct??
2. is there a SQL statement to name the results table for a given query?
From SAPDB:
A result table name identifies a result table (see table).
Syntax
<result_table_name> ::= <identifier>
And I've got no idea what is beging impiled beyond that it is possible to name a results table. Obtained from :
http://www.sapdb.org/htmhelp/da/ed9036dfe4b903e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
If anyone can help, that would be fantastic!!!
Cheers
fauxn

I've check the code, when the dialog box is opened a new connection is made, and i still get the same error:
SAP DBTech JDBC: Object is closed
com.sap.dbtech.jdbc.exceptions.ObjectIsClosedException: SAP DBTech
JDBC: Object is closed
at com.sap.dbtech.jdbc.ConnectionItem.assertOpen(Connection
Item.java:54)
at com.sap.dbtech.jdbc.ResultSetSapDB.beforeFirst(ResultSet
SapDB.java:177)
at blastDb.Table.getResultSetSize(Table.java:205)
at blastDb.Table.setCursor(Table.java:227)
at ViewDatabase$RegionPanel.setRegionList(ViewDatabase.java
:354)
at ViewDatabase$TabPanel.showRegionList(ViewDatabase.java:1
80)
at ViewDatabase$TabButtonListener.actionPerformed(ViewDatab
ase.java:289)
at java.awt.Button.processActionEvent(Button.java:381)
at java.awt.Button.processEvent(Button.java:350)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:3526
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3367)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:445)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(Ev
entDispatchThread.java:191)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Even
tDispatchThread.java:144)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThr
ead.java:138)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThr
ead.java:130)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.jav
a:98)
when i ask rsR to collect the results from it's query.
Dosen't make sence, unless its they way I'm implementint the GUI???
I'll look into the JDBC driver bug.
Cheers

Select from table of records

Hi,
Inside of a stored procedure I created:
- a record type:TYPE gr_rec IS RECORD (contact_id number)
- a table of records: TYPE gr_tb IS table of gr_rec INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER
and then I populated the table in a loop: tb(i).contact_id := a.contact_id.
My question is:
Is it posible to perform a select statement on the table of records to get only distinct records?
If not, how can I filter these records, as I use the procedure as a block data source in a form and I need only distinct records.
Note: I can not obtain select rows from the query that populates the table.
Thank you, Monica

Look at this function:
create or replace type TYP_REC_EMP as object
EMPNO     NUMBER(4),
ENAME     VARCHAR2(10),
JOB       VARCHAR2(10),
MGR       NUMBER(4),
HIREDATE DATE,
SAL       NUMBER(7,2),
COMM      NUMBER(7,2),
DEPTNO    NUMBER(2)
create or replace type TYP_TAB_REC_EMP is table of TYP_REC_EMP
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION Ret_Cur RETURN TYP_TAB_REC_EMP
IS
TAB TYP_TAB_REC_EMP := TYP_TAB_REC_EMP(NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL);
CURSOR C_EMP IS
SELECT *
FROM   EMP ;
i PLS_INTEGER := 0 ;
BEGIN
FOR CEMP IN C_EMP LOOP
         TAB.extend ;
        i := i + 1 ;
        TAB(i) := TYP_REC_EMP
                        CEMP.EMPNO,
                         CEMP.ENAME,
                         CEMP.JOB,
                         CEMP.MGR,
                         CEMP.HIREDATE,
                         CEMP.SAL,
                         CEMP.COMM,
                         CEMP.DEPTNO
END LOOP ;
RETURN TAB ;
END;
/And the Sql*plus query :
SQL*Plus: Release 9.0.1.3.0 - Production on Ve Mar 24 09:18:37 2006
(c) Copyright 2001 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Connecté à :
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.5.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
JServer Release 9.2.0.5.0 - Production
SQL>
SQL> SELECT DISTINCT(empno),deptno FROM TABLE(ret_cur()) WHERE deptno=20
2 /
     EMPNO     DEPTNO
      7369         20
      7566         20
      7788         20
      7876         20
      7902         20
SQL> Francois

RE: Is it possible to sort tags?

This is a continuation of the Support Forum question titled: “Is it possible to sort tags?” located at:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/963133?esab=a&as=s&r=2&page=1
If this new topic has to be posed as a new question the following applies.
If you visit the above link you will learn how convoluted were the solutions provided to non-programmers.
I CERTAINLY EXPECTED THAT BY NOW there would have been an effort to address the Tag sorting issue, since there have been a number of upgrades since this question was first posted. Tag sorting provides a much more robust browser many more would choose to use. It would also attract more users concerned about the control on our liberties if supplied with a browser that truly has more powerful capabilities to garner and access information.
One of the points the Firefox Team uses to attract more to use it is the protection it gives from snoops. You’ve got to ask yourself how much protection that might be if developers can’t do something simple (for talented programmers) like provide tag sorting. That comment is from, basically, a non-programmer, so I have no idea how much code would have to be written to bring this about. I suspect they don’t either and possibly fear the effort might turn out to be much greater than it really is.
It’s been a LONG time since I used Internet Explorer by Microsoft. What brought me to Firefox was their mission statement to provide access free of its own brand of commercialism and free usage of the Internet, which also implied an effort to protect privacy. For the same reasoning I would not use Google, after reports of their cooperation with government heads in China. Reports have also surfaced that Microsoft has provided a back-door to the NSA for their Internet Search engine, all of this in total disregard to the US Constitution’s 4th Amendment requiring a warrant from a court to prevent unreasonable searches and seizures. I would, however, wish that Firefox would OPENLY adhere to the Bill of Rights in their Privacy Policy, which is not stated in so many words. Many would say, “I don’t have anything to hide, so I don’t care.” Apparently they are unaware how dirty politics and politicians can be. This is the reason why a viable alternative, such as Firefox, is so important.
If you wish to learn more about just one individual who has dedicated his life in service to this country in terms of providing liberty to the widest possible number along with a promise to use the wealth he has built throughout his life (except for the necessity of living in exile), visit the following:
http://wantarevelations.com/wanta-black-swan-white-hat/
This is just one of the links that would be a lot easier to access, were it possible to sort Tags.
Is this off-topic? Not really.

HI MozillaFirefoxNewbie,
Thank you for your question, even though this is not off topic, the points made would have a better audience in a feature proposal in Bugzilla. Please check out the features and description here:
[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Firefox&component=Bookmarks%20%26%20History]
As mentioned in the previously posted thread, there was a work around provided by [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/963133#answer-462676 jscher] that sounded functional.
However if there is no extension desired, I encourage to proved the steps and objective of the feature.
If you open up the Bookmark Library however and click the drop down of 'Tags', they are in alphabetical order.
Have you tried this built into Firefox?
Cheers

Sort the internal table based on the vendor field

hello experts,
I am stuck with a small problem...
I am uploading the data for partner association for vendors through lsmw BI program.
I am collecting all the records in the end of trasaction and downloading all those records on to the apps server.
I declared one internal table as
TYPES: BEGIN OF type_erecord,
        mesg(1000) TYPE c,
        END OF type_erecord.
DATA: t_precord type standard table of type_erecord initial size 0,
            w_precord type type_erecord.
I am concatenating all the fields and moving to the internal table..
concatenate zvendor_master-source zvendor_master-lifnr blf00-lifnr
                  zvendor_master-lname    zvendor_master-parvw
                  zvendor_master-psource zvendor_master-pname
                  zvendor_master-lifn2        bwyt3-lifn2
                  zvendor_master-ekorg      zvendor_master-werks
                  w_PLANT-muplant           zvendor_master-defpa
                  v_message
      into w_precord-mesg separated by c_pipe.
      append w_precord to t_precord.
now at the end I have to sort this internal table t_precord based on blf00-lifnr
can any one guide me how to do it
Thanks for your anticipation
Nitesha

OK...
Than you can create one more table and do the process of sorting and than put data into the final table.
TYPES: BEGIN OF type_erecord,
mesg(1000) TYPE c,
END OF type_erecord.
DATA: t_precord type standard table of type_erecord initial size 0,
w_precord type type_erecord.
TYPES: BEGIN OF type_erecord_1,
mesg(1000) TYPE c,
lifnr type blf00-lifnr , "<<<
END OF type_erecord_1.
DATA: t_precord_1 type standard table of type_erecord initial size 0,
w_precord_1 type type_erecord.
I am concatenating all the fields and moving to the internal table..
concatenate zvendor_master-source zvendor_master-lifnr blf00-lifnr
zvendor_master-lname zvendor_master-parvw
zvendor_master-psource zvendor_master-pname
zvendor_master-lifn2 bwyt3-lifn2
zvendor_master-ekorg zvendor_master-werks
w_PLANT-muplant zvendor_master-defpa
v_message
into w_precord_1-mesg separated by c_pipe.
w_precord_1-lifnr = blf00-lifnr . " <<<
append w_precord_1 to t_precord_1.   " <<<
SORT T_PRECORD_1 by LIFNR. " <<
LOOP AT T_PRECORD_1 into w_precord_1.
move-corresponing w_precord_1 to w_precord.
append w_precord to T_PRECORD.
clear w_precord .
endloop.
Regards,
Naimesh Patel

Update statement for object table.

Hi,
I have created one type as
Create type test as object(
ins_by varchar2(30),
ins_on date,
upd_by varchar2( 30),
upd_on date);
and then created an object table as
create table imst(
i_code number(5),
i_desc varchar2(35),
i_op test);
now i am able to insert record in this table as
insert into imst values(1,'Hawkins cooker',test(user,sysdate,'',''));
Above works fine.
But I would also like to update the record with i_op.upd_by,i_op.upd_on with some other values.
Can any body help me specifying how to write a plain update statement for the same.
Regards.
Soumen

Check it out:
SQL> Create type myTest as object(
2 ins_by varchar2(30),
3 ins_on date,
4 upd_by varchar2( 30),
5 upd_on date);
6 /
Type created.
SQL> create table imst(
2 i_code number(5),
3 i_desc varchar2(35),
4 i_op myTest);
Table created.
SQL> insert into imst values(1,'Hawkins cooker', mytest(user,sysdate,'',''));
1 row created.
SQL> select * from imst;
    I_CODE I_DESC
I_OP(INS_BY, INS_ON, UPD_BY, UPD_ON)
         1 Hawkins cooker
MYTEST('APC_LOAD', '12-JUL-04', NULL, NULL)
SQL> update imst i set i.i_op.upd_by = USER, i.i_op.upd_on = add_months(sysdate, 1);
1 row updated.
SQL> select * from imst;
    I_CODE I_DESC
I_OP(INS_BY, INS_ON, UPD_BY, UPD_ON)
         1 Hawkins cooker
MYTEST('APC_LOAD', '12-JUL-04', 'APC_LOAD', '12-AUG-04')
SQL> Smoke me a kipper I'll be back before breakfast.
Cheers, APC

Is it possible to sort rows by font color in Numbers ?

Is it possible to sort rows by font color in Numbers ?

CC,
You probably had something in mind when you applied the colors to the text. It's always best to record the conditions directly rather than to indicate them indirectly by by use of color.
You can use Conditional Formatting to do some color coding based on the condition. You might even find that it's easier to let the conditional format tool than to assign the colors manually.
Jerry

Object tables and procedures.

Hi! I apologize in advance if my question is too trivial. I'm building simple object-relational database, and i would like to move a lot of my programming logic into database. I plan to build object tables based on object types that contain not only attributes but also functions and procedures. Now for example, i have object type "product" that contains some atributes like id ,name, price..., and let say procedure LowerThePrice(Percentage NUMBER) that should change the actual data.
Now i create table Products of type product and fill it with some data. The question is how can i call/apply this procedure LowerThePrice on rows of products object table? If this scenario is even possible, how can i call that procedure using sql plus, and VB.net 2005 (i have installed and configured ODP.NET and oracle 11g).
Thanks!

1. Has been mentioned before - we do have a bug on it. To search across all your pl/sql, there is a report you can use.
2. We are working on improving errors but I can't make any promises.
3. We have heard this before but it won't be there for v1.0. You can use the Connections navigator to access the details of the objects that are accessible to you while you have a Worksheet open. You can even drag your Worksheet tab down to place it under the Connections details tab so you can see them both at the same time.
4. In a post-v1.0 release, we will be looking at additional, alternate navigation.
5. We have an open bug to not prompt you for the same bind more than once.
6. I will talk to the Worksheet developer about this one. Not sure we can remember the binds from execution to execution but it would be a great enhancement.
7. Not sure why this is failing - I will check into it.
-- Sharon

Oracle ADF - popup table's record gets empty or blank after any db action.

Hi,
I am using Oracle jDev 11.1.1.4.0.
In my application i have find button in my jspx.
On click of find button i have shown popup with table.
As user selects record from popup table that record get displayed in form fields of jspx
and user can edit that record and save it in the database.
Suppose I have edited a record and saved the same in database.
Now, when I click on that find button, pop up opens but the record which I have just edited is not getting displayed correctly in the table.
Some fields are getting emptied.
I have set the property of entity object's attribute, refresh after update and insert.
But still selected record get empty in popup table after database transaction.
appreciate your help..
thanks
Rupashree
Edited by: 888077 on Sep 28, 2011 5:54 AM

By the sounds of it you are in the wrong forum :)
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Oracle adf - popup table's record get empty after any database tranasction.

Hi,
I am using Oracle jDev 11.1.1.4.0.
In my application i have find button in my jspx.
On click of find button i have shown popup with table.
As user selects record from popup table that record get displayed in form fields of jspx
and user can edit that record and save it in the database.
Suppose I have edited a record and saved the same in database.
Now, when I click on that find button, pop up opens but the record which I have just edited is not getting displayed correctly in the table.
Some fields are getting emptied.
I have set the property of entity object's attribute, refresh after update and insert.
But still selected record get empty in popup table after database transaction.
appreciate your help..
thanks
Rupa

By the sounds of it you are in the wrong forum :)
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Open cursor for PLSQL table of records

Is it possible to open a cursor for all data in a PLSQL table of records?
something like
cursor c (p1 number) is select * from <plsqltab>
where <plsqltab>.col = p1

There is no such thing as a PL/SQL table. Yes, I know that many calls this structure in PL/SQL a table. And that is exactly where all this confusion stems from.. and trying to treat such a "table" as an Oracle table using SQL.
The correct terms are dynamic array (indexed by integer) or dynamic associative array (indexed by varchar). And an array is nothing like a table ito RDBMS processing.
Yes, you can run SQLs against arrays. But it is "expensive". Why? Because the data sits inside PL/SQL Engine. Not in the SQL Engine. The data is in a PL/SQL defined structure. Not a SQL defined structure.
So.. the data needs to be shipped from the PL/SQL Engine to the SQL Engine and converted into a format that the SQL Engine can understand and use.
Also, once shipped and converted the SQL structure is not indexed. Which means that the only option is a full table scan of that structure.
So you need to ask yourself why do you want to use SQL against a PL/SQL array? As soon as you do that, you are saying "Hey, this PL/SQL table ain't good enough and I need to process it using SQL".
So why then does that data sit inside a PL/SQL array and not in a SQL table?
Oracle provides you with the ability to create temporary session tables. These can be indexed. SQL can be run against them without all the "expenses" that are associated with running SQL against a PL/SQL array.
PL/SQL arrays is a great tool. But only when it is the right tool to use. When someone says he/she needs SQL to use this tool, then I question the choice of the tool. Make sure you use the right tool for the job.

Possible to sort No object table's records?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for