Post invoice F-43 use alternative payee, found error require field Tax Jur.

Hello everyone
i have some problem
when i want to post invoice F-43,
and document need alternative payee.
in page input alternative payee data , system require field Tax Jurisdiction. that i donot need it.
you can see picture at link below.
http://picturepush.com/public/3913234
http://picturepush.com/public/3913243
how can i remove required field Tax jurisdiction for alternative payee data ?
I try to go to IMG -> preparation for creating vendor master data-> Define account groups with screen layout (Vendors)
and choose group 0003 (ALternative payee) but i donot found field Tax Jurisdiction for configure it.
what shoud i do?
please help.

Hi,
After entering the path : IMG-Financial Accounting-Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable-Vendor Accounts-Master data-Preparations for creating vendor master data-Define Account Groups with screen layout(Vendors)
select the 0003 for Alternative payee
Duble click on it
D'click on General data and D'click on Control
You will find the Tax jurisdiction code there you can make changes
thanks and regards
ramanuja

Similar Messages

How do I use 'submit' as complete pdf, and use 'drawn my signature' with required fields?

I have created a form with required fields, no problem. The form can be completed with adobe reader, and a signature added using Sign > Place signature > Draw my signature, great. But i need the required fields to be checked and then sent by email, so I have add a button and set the action to "Submit a form" and selected "PDF The Complete Document" from the options. I then add the javascript URL - mailto:????@????.com, but now the "Draw my signature" option is greyed out.
I have asked this question a number of times, and cannot get a proper answer, please can someone help or offer a work around.

George,
Thanks for your response, but I am not sure it fully answers my question. I have attached a screenshot to show what I mean - here I have created a simple form, with one required field for some data, using Acrobat XI. If I open the form (I have not reader enabled the form) in Adobe Reader XI, I am able to add a drawn signature, I could save the document then attach to an email to send as you have suggested.
But, If I now add a Submit button, set the URL to mail it to [email protected] and select "PDF the complete document" as below
When I open the document in Adobe Reader now, the signature options are all greyed out as you can see.
Hope this clarifies my predicament

How to use a button in a required field

Hi,
this is my scenario:
1) In a Form I have two Blocks
2) In the first, I use a text Item for the customer code, with the required property set to true and with a trigger WHEN-VALIDATE-ITEM
3) In the second block, I use a button that call the 'show_lov' function in order to display the list of the customers.
If the focus is out of the first block, I can use the button without problems.
If the focus is on the customer code Item and I try to use the serch button, the alert message "Field required" is displayed and I don't be able to use the function in the button.
Exist a method in order to use my button when the focus is in the required customer item?
If Yes, how can perform this ?
I hope...
Best Regards
Gaetano

When you set Required = Yes, you're telling Forms not to allow the user to navigate away from the item until they enter a required value. That's the way Forms is designed.
If you don't like that behavior (and I'm one that doesn't), I rarely use Required = Yes. Instead, I write the code to check for a required value in the PRE-COMMIT trigger. If the item doesn't have a value, I set focus to the item, and then issue a RAISE Form_Trigger_Failure.
I'm sure there are other ways to do this, but that is just one technique.

Alternative payee for ATI "Temporary Allocation of Companies" group

Hey everybody,
May you please help me to define a solution to handle the following
situation?
There are many ATI group vendors, each of them is constituted by one assignee, different invoicing parties and one payment recipient corresponding to the assignee. Each invoicing party can belong to different ATI groups.
All the purchase orders issued to a vendor defined as a ATI group will have the invoicing party one of the Companies, but the payee will always be the assignee of the group. Our problem is to handle this circumstance.
One solution is to update all the invoicing parties master data of a ATI group, specifying the assignee of the ATI as a alternative payee; this for each ATI group.
This solution, viable because if the invoicing party accept at least one different payee the system allows to specify one of them during the invoice entering, is time-consuming to be handled, and it is not optimal because one invoicing party could have different alternative payees (if belonging to different ATI groups). Furthermore, these payees would be not controlled and during the invoice registration an incorrect alternative payee might still be selected.
The solution we would like to apply is to indicate in the ATI group vendor master data:
- the assignee (it could be a partner role defined ad-hoc)
- the list of the invoicing parties (partner function PI)
- the payment recipient (alternative payee / partner function AZ)
without updating all the invoicing parties master data.
During the invoice registration, relating to a purchase order issued to a ATI group vendor, the system should detect that an alternative payment recipient is indicated in the vendor master data and make possible to specify it, although it doesn't appear in the invoicing party master data.
We have tried to apply this solution, assigning also a partner schema to the purchase order, but it didnt work because the system shows the payee field in the transaction MIRO only if the invoicing party allows for an alternative one.
Is there any possibility to apply this solution?
Thank you very much for your help,
Jo-anne

Hi Jo Anne
I'm also facing same problem did u got any ans for this.
If u found please reply to me for this ID : [email protected]
Many thanks...
Satish H

Alternative Payee

Hello,
1) "Alternative Payee in Document Allowed" field is active for selection at the time of new Vendor creation. Hence this poses a risk of payment being recorded. The requirement is that we need only one alternative payee should be added and the field for selection of the same will be only one alternative payee in display mode at the time of creation of any vendor.
2) Down Payment request (F-47) can be processed even though the PO is already closed. How to restrict that? The system should be configured so that Down Payment Request against closed POs can't be processed.
Thanks,
JK

Hi,
If vendor has a constant alternate payee, you can use Part Bank functionality other than using Alternate Payee.
Goto Vendor Master(FK02) -> Bank Details -> Add bank details for vendor with part bank ID, say 1000 for actual vendor and 1010 for other account in which account holder is the alternate payee.
Now while creating invoice, enter 1000 or 1010 in part bank field, therefore payment will be made through the selected accounts only.
Do check this method yourself thoroughly if it fits your requirement !
BR

Alternative payee through APP

Hi,
We can pay vendor bills to third party using Alternative payee in SAP I have maintain Alternative payee in vendor master while i am run a APP system issue third party but while running APP i want change Alternative payee again is it possible to change in APP.
Regards,
Raju.

Hi Sridevi
Please check the table PAYR and see what is the check number in the table for the other payment document. The current check details should be there in the table. This means that in FCHN there is some selection parameter that you need to change. Just give the details of the paying company code, account id and house bank. Just give the check number and nothing else in the selection. I am sure the amount will show up. Let me know what was the result.
Karthik

Getting problem while posting Invoice

Hi all,
Ofcourse this problem is related functional thing, i am posting in ABAP group. we are getting problem while posting invoice through f-43 transaction. The error is "Fiscal year 0000 not allowed for year-dependent commitment items". Please let me know if u have any solution.
Thanks in advance.
chandrasekhar.

Hi chandrasekhar,
pls post some infos:
1) application aerea of the message and message no.
2) document date / posting date
and ohter date-fileds of the document
3) SAP-Release
Have you search in SAP-OSS with the message no. or
message text ?
regards Andreas

Getting error msg while posting entry in GL using F-02

Hi gurus,
While i am posting entry in GL using F-02 getting error message as "no controlling area has been assigned to company code"
can any help me out at the stage i dint want to configure co settings is there any way to pass the entries
Thanks & regards
Nandini

Hi Nandini,
Have you defined a GL account as a cost element? I think you have multiple company codes which are using same chart of accounts and this company code is also using the same chart of accounts. And also you have configured single controlling area for all company codes. Even though you have not assigned this company code to controlling area. The cost elements will create at controlling area level.
Due to this system is throwing error message.
Please check and let us know if you have other issue.
Regards,
Mukthar

Problems in Posting an Accounting Document using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST

Hi All,
I am facing a problem when I try to post an accounting document using the BAPI "BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST".
While passing data to the structure "ACCOUNTTAX", I get the errors "Required field AMT_BASE was not transferred in parameter CURRENCYAMOUNT" and "Required field TAX_CODE was not transferred in parameter ACCOUNTTAX".
Till now I was not passing the ACCOUNTTAX structure to the BAPI and posting was happening fine.
Any pointers / solutions in this direction will be most helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Keerthi

Hi
As u told earlier it was fine , so it may there is some config. change done by func. so this error is coming.
For minimum required fields fo BAPI , u can go to SE37 and click on Function Module Documentation on Application tool bar.
here u will find good help.
Regards
Sachin

How to control the alternative payee from invoice postings

hi,
i have a requirement, we are useing the alternative payee for vandor payment, my client want to post only payments through alternative payee. some times by mistake users posted invoices to alternative payee account. so here after i want to control the alternative payee from invoice postings. how to do the configuration.
rgds
gopal

If I understand your question correctly, you are trying to prevent accidental invoice posting to altenative payee vendor instead of real vendor.
If this is right, then block the alternate payee vendor in company code. Maintain Altenate payee in general data > Payment transactions data.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Subodh

Post non PO invoice line items using INVOIC01 and FM IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM

hello there SAP folks,
Have an interesting question for all of you. We currently have a partner through whom we use the IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM Function module to pass invoices. Now there are multiple line items some times [multi E1EDP01 / E1EDP02] segments which all refer to the same PO but to different line items on the PO. Now all that is well.
For one particular partner we now have the following requirement. We are going to have the same condition as above, with the added condition that there are going to be some invoice line items with no reference to a PO. the reason is that the vendor is going to calculate the different taxes and send them to us. so when we post the invoice :
we will now have
31 Vendor
40 GR/IR
40 Tax 1
40 Tax 2
50 Tax 3 offset
instead of
31 vendor
40 GR/IR
to deal with the new situation I tried adding having the following
first E1EDP02 is going to refer to the PO using qualifier 001, but second E1EDP02 [for tax] s not going to have a qualifier 001. When I do that i get a missing belnr (001) and zeile (001) error.the exact error message is the following
Required field BELNR(001) is missing in segment E1EDP02
Required field ZEILE(001) is missing in segment E1EDP02
Message no. FD070
Now to bypass that, I added the 001 qualifier for the second E1EDP02 [tax part] and now the error that I get is either the PO is duplicated or if i put some dummy PO number, then it says PO cannot be found.
=======
so the question is how is it possible to post 4 items in the idoc , with one being a PO reference and 3 non PO reference using INVOIC01 and IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM
I also have to add that it is possible to add a non PO items to the MM invoice in MIRO by entering the additional tax lines using the g/l account tab next to the PO reference tab.

nvm.
Edited by: D N on Dec 16, 2008 2:10 PM

Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user

Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in when the approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted using a background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST and i am returning the Message Text to my workflow container from this method. When i see the log an exception is rasied from this method with an error message "V004: You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is having SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice using the method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the issue. Please advice.

Hi Sapient,
The Parameter, Roles would be different for the LOGIN USER and WF-BATCH.. So ask your administrator
to set the Roles & Parameters similar to that of LOGIN USER to WF-BATCH.
For further refrence check in SU01 giving the LOGIN USER and then check with WF-BATCH... you would
find the difference...
Hope this would help you..
Good luck
Narin

Alternative Payee set up in vendor master record for payments....

Hi all,
I am facing the problem on alternative payee set up in vendor master record.
I have done the following settings but its not working.
1) Created alternative payee vendor (XYZ) and blocked for posting.
2) Created main vendor (ABCD) and given alternative payee vendor name (XYZ) in alternative payee field payment transactions tab of(general data + company code data) main vendor.
3) Created an invoice for main vendor (ABCD) using F-43.
4) Trying to make payment to main vendor (ABCD) in f-53. So when i simulate the document system supposed to show automatically the alternative payee vendor number . But itu2019s not showing and still making payment to main vendor not alternative payee.
Please help me to solve this issue. Is there any other settings need to be done to achieve this scenario (alternative payee).
Thank you very much.

Hello,
thank you for your quick reply.
1) i taken out the payment block for alternative vendor (XYZ) and tried again the above 3rd and 4th steps but still not working system paying to main verdor (ABCD) instead alternative payee(XYZ).
2) i blocked for payment posting the main vendor(ABCD) and tested same still not working.
need helps to resolve this.
thanq.

IDoc error M8(183) in posting invoice from SRM to ECC

Hi everybody,
I am posting invoice in SRM against GR done in ECC. But the corresponding IDoc is in error when it reaches ECC. I am using MM-SUS scenario with SRM7.0, PI7.0, ECC6.0. Message types used are InvoiceRequest_Out and INVOIC.INVOIC01.
1) Error message: "M8(183) : Delivery note/service entry sheet & & does not exist".
2) First I applied note 1063742, but it did not resolve the problem. When I went into further detail, I found that the XML payload generated for the invoice in SRM does not contain GR number of ECC, but the corresponding GR number generated in SRM is passed onto ECC.
3) This SRM GR number is available in field BELNR of IDoc segment E1EDP02 (segment 12).
My question is, how to enable the invoice generated in SRM to carry the ECC GR document number, so that the corresponding IDoc in ECC recognises the GR number against which it was made. Please let me know if any alternative exists, also.
regards,
biplab

Hi everyone,
Able to solve the problem by applying note 1344626 (GR based invoice not updated in backend PO).
biplab

Disable 'Delete' button for posted invoices in GOS Attachment List

Hi,
when i open the attachement list of a generic object i see the attached files. In this dialog i want to disable the "Delete" ( attachment) button for Posted invoices ( In MIR4 tcode -> If the invoice is already posted it should not allow to delete the attachment )
I read oss notes and some ides of copying diverse classes but nothing really helps.
I found two badis
GOS_SRV_REQUEST
GOS_SRV_SELECT
but i dont know where we have to write our code .
I read so many posts related to attachments but all the places described about authoriztion object .
Can you please give some ideas to disable the delete button for posted invoices.

Hello,
For GOS there is no SAP Standard authorization concept. The only way to
manage GOS authorizations is implementing it via custom code as
described in SAP Note: 491271.
Please have a look at the SAP notes:
491271 Authorizations for generic object services
701609 Authorizations for services: Final classes
For the use of S_OC_ROLE: this object states if a user is an office
administrator he can create, modify or delete every document, even
those created by other users. If the user is not an office admin, the
user is still able to create his own attachments.
Regarding to the issue, there is an role object S_GUI for upload.
To match your inquiry, pleaes find the user's role and active the
object S_GUI.
Regards,
David

Post invoice F-43 use alternative payee, found error require field Tax Jur.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for