Postfix/master "master exite time has arrived"

Recently I've been seeing lot's of these entries in the mail.log - every minute.
I found an archived discussion at https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2251240?start=0&tstart=0
Archived or not I'd like to bring it up again since in google the archived solution was the first entry and didn't provide a solution.
I found a good explanation of what is going on here http://mykle.com/msl/?p=502
The issue here seems to be, that the server was trying to transmit an email that took it too long - took to long = more than 60 seconds. You can change this behavior in the file /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.postfix.master.plist
Convert the file to xml with sudo plutil -convert xml1 /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.postfix.master.plist
edit the file - choos editor you like - the key that says "60" to something bigger (I made it 600 = 10 Minutes)
Convert the file back to binary with sudo plutil -convert binary1 /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.postfix.master.plist
Unload the plist with sudo launchctl unload /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.postfix.master.plist
Load the plist with sudo launchctl load /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.postfix.master.plist
This worked for me - thanks to Michael?

Good info.. thanks for posting

Similar Messages

Frequent postfix "master exit time has arrived" error messages in the log

I'm seeing this in my mail.log every minute:
Dec 1 12:27:46 Executor postfix/master[6394]: master exit time has arrived
Dec 1 12:27:46 Executor postfix/master[6399]: daemon started -- version 2.5.5, configuration /etc/postfix
Dec 1 12:28:46 Executor postfix/master[6399]: master exit time has arrived
Dec 1 12:28:46 Executor postfix/master[6406]: daemon started -- version 2.5.5, configuration /etc/postfix
Dec 1 12:29:46 Executor postfix/master[6406]: master exit time has arrived
Dec 1 12:29:46 Executor postfix/master[6409]: daemon started -- version 2.5.5, configuration /etc/postfix
This does not seem to be normal behavior. Is something misconfigured here? How can I fix this?

just experienced this and found your thread while looking for an answer.
do you have any thing in /var/spool/postfix/maildrop ? if there is something there, then launchd will keep launching postfix.
(ls /var/spool/postfix/maildrop)
i had a file there, and the permissions were wrong for it to process. so it kept launching, but never was able to clear the folder.
i did a chmod 775 on that document ( something like: sudo chmod 755 /var/spool/postfix/maildrop/* ), and that has fixed it after years of issues.
i'm not sure it's the best answer, but worked for me.
Message was edited by: neuralstatic
btw, i had tried to disable the launchd entry for it, but that was no help.

Recurring postfix/master loop

Hi; I keep seeing the following recurring set of messages in Console:
3/8/15 11:19:10 AM    Firewall[74]    master is listening from 0.0.0.0:25 proto=6
3/8/15 11:19:10 AM    postfix/master[7325]    daemon started -- version 2.5.14, configuration /etc/postfix
3/8/15 11:20:10 AM    postfix/master[7325]    master exit time has arrived
3/8/15 11:20:10 AM    Firewall[74]    master is listening from 0.0.0.0:25 proto=6
3/8/15 11:20:10 AM    postfix/master[7373]    daemon started -- version 2.5.14, configuration /etc/postfix
3/8/15 11:21:10 AM    postfix/master[7373]    master exit time has arrived
3/8/15 11:21:11 AM    Firewall[74]    master is listening from 0.0.0.0:25 proto=6
3/8/15 11:21:11 AM    postfix/master[7385]    daemon started -- version 2.5.14, configuration /etc/postfix
3/8/15 11:22:11 AM    postfix/master[7385]    master exit time has arrived
3/8/15 11:22:11 AM    postfix/master[7389]    daemon started -- version 2.5.14, configuration /etc/postfix
I have looked at other similar discussions dealing with Postfix loops, but I can't find one with a set of messages identical to the above, so I'm not sure if any of the posted solutions will work for this issue.
Can anyone advise me on how to diagnose and fix this? I have to think that it is consuming unnecessary resources and slowing down processing.
I am running Mac OS X 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) on a mid-2010 MacBook Pro.
Thanks for any help and advice on this.
- mklingmd

Good info.. thanks for posting

[SOLVED] Postfix master process exits immediately on startup

Symptom: Postfix says it has started, but when checked the daemon is not running.
Troubleshooting: Upon deeper investigation, logs reveal an error message like the following:
/var/log/mail.log wrote:<timestamp> <hostname> postfix/master[<pid id>]: fatal: 0.0.0.0:smtp: Servname not supported for ai_socktype
Problem: /etc/services file is missing, causing the Postfix master process to exit immediately on startup.
Solution: Reinstall the package iana-etc, or restore the services file from your /etc backup.

Symptom: Postfix says it has started, but when checked the daemon is not running.
Troubleshooting: Upon deeper investigation, logs reveal an error message like the following:
/var/log/mail.log wrote:<timestamp> <hostname> postfix/master[<pid id>]: fatal: 0.0.0.0:smtp: Servname not supported for ai_socktype
Problem: /etc/services file is missing, causing the Postfix master process to exit immediately on startup.
Solution: Reinstall the package iana-etc, or restore the services file from your /etc backup.

What is org.postfix.master and how can I stop it? Do I want to?

Hi All,
I have this going on in console every 10 seconds, endlessly:
18/07/2011 18:20:41          com.apple.launchd[1]          (org.postfix.master[313]) Exited with exit code: 1
18/07/2011 18:20:41          com.apple.launchd[1]          (org.postfix.master) Throttling respawn: Will start in 9 seconds
18/07/2011 18:20:51          com.apple.launchd[1]          (org.postfix.master[314]) Exited with exit code: 1
18/07/2011 18:20:51          com.apple.launchd[1]          (org.postfix.master) Throttling respawn: Will start in 9 seconds
18/07/2011 18:21:01          com.apple.launchd[1]          (org.postfix.master[315]) Exited with exit code: 1
18/07/2011 18:21:01          com.apple.launchd[1]          (org.postfix.master) Throttling respawn: Will start in 9 seconds
18/07/2011 18:21:11          com.apple.launchd[1]          (org.postfix.master[316]) Exited with exit code: 1
18/07/2011 18:21:11          com.apple.launchd[1]          (org.postfix.master) Throttling respawn: Will start in 9 seconds
I don't know why but my instinct says this should not be happening.
Can someone please tell me:
1. do i need this? if so, what is it?
2. if not, how can i stop it?
Thanks!

here you go:
Jul 18 22:24:28 marks-macbook postfix/master[335]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:24:38 marks-macbook postfix/master[336]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:24:48 marks-macbook postfix/master[337]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:24:58 marks-macbook postfix/master[339]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:25:08 marks-macbook postfix/master[340]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:25:18 marks-macbook postfix/master[341]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:25:28 marks-macbook postfix/master[342]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:25:38 marks-macbook postfix/master[347]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:25:48 marks-macbook postfix/master[351]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:25:58 marks-macbook postfix/master[354]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:26:08 marks-macbook postfix/master[355]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:26:18 marks-macbook postfix/master[357]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:26:28 marks-macbook postfix/master[358]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:26:38 marks-macbook postfix/master[361]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:26:48 marks-macbook postfix/master[363]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:26:58 marks-macbook postfix/master[364]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:27:08 marks-macbook postfix/master[366]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
Jul 18 22:27:18 marks-macbook postfix/master[367]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock: cannot open file: Permission denied
I guess the gist of it is, somehow my user does not have permission to open some file. Strange since I own the thing...
Any ideas?

Master data time dependency

Hi if i put the manager as employee in cube then we are loading the data from flat file full load then it will overwrite the manager name in cube for last month
say i have manager name john for month 08
i load the trans data from flat file it will take it
now next manager name john now if i load the data it will overwrite, user want to maintain the history so that if i run the query for month 08 it should show me manager name john and if i run the query for month 09 it should show me manager name john. please help how to resolve this
since making too many time dependent master data will over load the system so user do not want that. also is there any way to load delta from flat file in bw version 3.0
i will reward 100% point if anybody can clarify the approach to make this happen
soniya

Hi,
If you set the master data attribute as "time dependent" it will track such changes as well as validity dates.
Of course, you would not make even the majority of master data time-dependent, but in cases where modeling calls for it (such as this), it probably should be utilized. It will not "overload the system".
Please be clear - while master data InfoObjects contain over-write functionality, an InfoCube does not. Data loaded into a cube simply is an "insert".
For your generation of delta, note that the ODS object contains a change log mechanism. This change log can generate a "delta" from a flat file load or any kind of load. This delta can then be used in other data loads sourced from the change log.
Also, you might consider a technique to load a complete history of master data into an ODS object. You can model an ODS without any key figures, but be aware the defauly will be "update", where the only complete history is in the change log. You could implement a "technical key" in update rules, so that each record gets a unique identifier, preventing over-write. Alternatively, if you are on BI in SAP NetWeaver 2004s, you can use a write-optimized DataStore object, which automatically assigns a unique technical key to each record (so that you have complete history), but has no change log.
Thanks for any points you choose to assign -
Ron Silberstein
SAP

Asset Master Record - Time Dependent tab - locations to be created

Hi Guru's
Hot to create the new locations in the Asset Master Record - time dependent tab.
Some locations descriptions I need to change.
Please help me.
Regards
Jenny Connes

Hi,
change your location description at following SPRO location:
SPRO->Enterprise Structure -> Definition->Logistic - General ->Define Location
Thanks,
Dharmesh

Customer master creation time

Hi
where can i find customer master creation time ?
regards

In XD02/XD03 transaction code
Extras->Administrative data(Shift + F8)

Master data time dependent

hi bwers,
Can any expert tell me, Under what reporting senarios do we need to matintain master data time-dependent

Hi,
You do this when you want to maintain the history. Like for 0COSTCENTER master data, most of it is time dependant. As an example, the person responsible for a costcenter...you want to know who it is and also who it was earlier. This can only be done with time dependant master data as it adds the from and to fields to the data.
Hope this helps...

Why is org.postfix.master running

Hi,
When I do a
launchctl list
it list org.postfix.master as running. I'm not running mail so why would this be?
If I try and unload it
launchctl unload org.postfix.master.plist it says there is nothing ti unload.
Is it normal for it to run even if I'm not running mail?
Thanks.
Pat

Yes, the default configuration is for SMTP (postfix) to be available on demand in case for example a web application needs to mail out.
If you want to completely disable it, issue:
sudo /bin/launchctl unload -w /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.postfix.master.plist
This will disable the launchd item. Careful with using Server Admin though as it will re-enable it when you use the mail section of it.

My apple I'd has been discarded for security reasons. The site asks me to give my email and they would send me the further instruction. But no Emil has arrived so far. Since January. And I did requested help multiple times. :( any ideas where can I solve

My apple I'd has been discarded for security reasons. The site asks me to give my email and they would send me the further instruction. But no Emil has arrived so far. Since January. And I did requested help multiple times. :( any ideas where can I solve

Who discarded the Apple ID? Apple? or You?
Did you answer the Security Questions? Is the backup email accurate? Have you tried contacting them?

"/var/spool/postfix/maildrop" Missing After Time Machine Restore

Hello,
After performing a full restore via Time Machine, the following error message appears constantly in my console:
3/8/08 9:48:00 PM com.apple.launchd[1] (org.postfix.master) Failed to count the number of files in "/var/spool/postfix/maildrop": No such file or directory
After performing a Google search and reading the Apple discussions, it appears that Time Machine excludes the /postfix/maildrop directory from its backups. While this seems to be the problem, I can't find a solution as to how to fix it. I suppose I could create the directory but I don;t want to do this before I am certain as to what its purpose is.
Any help or point in the right direction will be appreciated.
Cheers

After doing some more digging on the Internet, I believe I have found the solution. Here's a link to the original post by carbonite19: http://www.insanelymac.com/lofiversion/index.php/t87650.html
Use these instructions at your own risk.
CONSOLE ERROR MESSAGE:
com.apple.launchd[1] (org.postfix.master) Failed to count the number of files in "/var/spool/postfix/maildrop": No such file or directory</code>
THE FIX:
Open terminal make sure you are at root directory and type:
sudo mkdir /var/spool/postfix [enter]
<password> [enter]
postfix stop [enter]
postfix start [enter]
The postfix folder is created and the directories are rebuilt.
This seemed to work for me. Be sure to read the original post for more information.
Cheers

Will ADF fusion applications matchup as Java EE 6 has arrived?

Here is my view as a simple developer who doesn't like complications :)
1)With ADF, the first thing that wowed me long back was how well integrated the stack is, calling business logic from frontend was quite easy as JDeveloper did lot of work of creating relevant XML files and so on. With Java EE 6, i simply use CDI to inject EJB's in managed beans and start using it right away. Infact EJB's can now be also included in WAR files which i guess will be a good news for small to medium scale applications using Java EE6 web profile. Isn't CDI a better approach for integration rather than lots of XML files. Isn't Java EE 6 more intuitive approach rather than developer having to worry about additional resources being added to the project?
2)I love ADF since we can setup validation in Entity objects and it gets reflected in frontend too. With Java EE 6, bean validation i get almost similar features as validation code is not repeated in every tier.
3)ADF involves a steep learning curve with additional lookup in Business Object API's for various scenarios as well as knowledge of core JSF. With Java EE 6 providing seamless integration, the learning curve is lot less, JSF 2.0 + EJB CDI Bean Validation combination seems sufficient for most projects.(CDI specification only about 100 pages, Bean Validation specification about 145 pages and this year itself books related to Java EE 6 will be out for those who don't like the specification approach)
4)I always had issues with ADF applications taking lot of time to startup. I tried some sample Java EE 6 application(on glassfish v3), using JSF2.0 + EJB combination. They start as fast as pure JSP applications. Plus the memory required by Netbeans(with integrated Glassfish v3) is quite less.(JDeveloper + Weblogic+ Oracle XE require lots of space). Netbeans(i use it just because it has support for Java EE 6) starts in around 10 secs whereas JDeveloper takes around a minute at least on my PC.
5)Java EE 6 applications will run on all compliant servers and already development is on for Java EE 6 compliance. Such claims cant be made for current ADF applications. Isn't it a kind of application server vendor lock in?
6)I have personally found jsf libraries like Rich faces, Prime faces, Ice faces quite easier to use than ADF Faces. For the former cases, i simply look up the demo show cases and use the relevant code in my projects. Using ADF faces is easy with JDeveloper but when i look at the source code, i find it much more complex than other JSF libraries, lots of binding stuff in it. With richfaces, prime faces etc, i get a sense of control over the UI code. Granted ADF has more components then any other JSF framework, but really using a particular JSF library like RichFaces or Prime Faces is more then sufficient for me. Plus some libraries are already JSF 2.0 compliant. At the start, i was impressed by the charting components which ADF provided, but now virtually every JSF library provides them. Pages can be edited at source code level in other libraries, i cant imagine doing the same with ADF Faces.
7)ADF Faces is currently not free (at least till the last time i checked it), many other libraries are. Thats a big big plus for small budget projects who dont happen to have Weblogic.
8)When i tried building demo application using ADF, first of all Weblogic takes a lot of time to start, plus it took lot of time to just view a modified page. Glassfish v3 starts in just few seconds, plus pages are served quite quickly. I did follow some steps in various blogs about how to improve performance of JDeveloper+Weblogic for development purposes. However JDeveloper + Weblogic combo create-edit-test time is more than netbeans +glassfish v3 combo. Infact i have always wondered, why i am forced to test my ADF applications on a production level server like Weblogic and not on smaller ones like tomcat or even full EE servers like glassfish. If am forced to use a particular server for testing, then i expect quick runs. Visual Studio with integrated IIS is so fast, in fact there is hardly any wait time to see a modified page.(I have developed both Java EE as well as Asp.net applications, and i guess mentioning them is OK since its also a component oriented framework)
9)This is a rather offbeat point. Asp.net framework offers Gridview, a table control which is heavily used by .net guys.(Infact a new control ListView has arrived which offers far more features). In ADF lazy loading tables, there is no direct paging available(i mean paging where we actually see the pager control), with developers having to find out ways to include paging. In other library say PrimeFaces, there is table control which has lazy loading as well as paging built in. Cant there be such a control in ADF with paging as well as template based approach like ListView of Asp.Net? In fact i still haven't found a flexible control like ListView in Java arena. Guess i have to build one since JSF 2.0 has made buildings controls very easy :)
With Java EE 6, JSF 2.0 + EJB + CDI + Bean Validation, do we need the overall complexity which ADF applications inherently have?
Edited by: Nash Era on Jan 30, 2010 8:58 AM

Thanks for taking time for replying :)
Good to hear that Java EE 6 is being considered in ADF future development. For once, a standard seems developed by fellow developers rather than over engineered stuff coming out of a committee meeting( well it started with Java EE 5).
For me, another framework is required only if a standard doesn't suffice all the needs. I mean why increase a developers burden by making him learn whims and fancies of new framework with all its API, its usage, etc.And Java EE 6 has lots of features to satisfy a wide variety of development scenarios.
1) Actually, i wasn't pointing to injecting specific code in model. For eg: [this |http://www.adam-bien.com/roller/abien/entry/ejb_3_1_killed_the], [simple javaEE6|http://www.adam-bien.com/roller/abien/entry/simplest_possible_jsf_2_ejb] .All business logic in session bean, clueless about how its going to be utilized by any front end. When i use a particular UI technology, say JSF 2.0. i simply inject the session bean in one of my JSF managed bean and start using it. No XML files, no binding directly visible for the developer, all binding magic taken care of courtesy, CDI. In fact now a JSF managed bean doesn't need to declared in faces-config.xml, a simple @ManagedBean and scope declaration is enough, one , two , three
Even i am skeptical about how annotations which are being liberally used affects project maintenance. Hope it doesn't turn out to be annotation Hell!
With JPA 2.0 including lots of new features, JSF 2.0 being enhanced further, a lot of development scenarios seems already covered.
3)It really took a lot of time for me to get a hang of ADF. Simple applications are easy to manage, but reading the developers guide took a while.(The guides are really good, the best thing about oracle is how well documented there products are).
5)Actually i tried porting a sample ADF application on Tomcat. Wasn't successful at it. (Actually i gave up since i didn't have that much time). A official support for ADF on various servers would be great.
6)ADF BC as business layer and ADF Faces as UI does involve bindings. Plus a extra binding xml file for each JSF page. With Java EE 6, i have no extra items in my project.
Am looking forward to how JDeveloper, the IDE of choice for me, provides support for Java EE 6,specifically if any annotation GUI kind of support is provided for DI.
7)I wasn't saying that ADF is not worth its price tag. Just that free alternatives are available which may suffice many projects.
9)About components, a pager control is so much required. I mean for web applications, if we present a product list to the user, he gets a sense of number of products in a list just by looking at the pager below. Better user experience can be achieved by pager control then scrollable tables. Say for amazon.com or ebay.com with search results in a scrollable table wont be acceptable. Plus pager provides a sense of completion than scrolls as the user doesn't have to worry if he has missed a item by scrolling past it. How many ecommerce sites out there use scrollable tables instead of pager? ADF should have catered to this large audience who prefer to have page numbers, prev, next, first, last buttons.
ListView in Asp.Net is very flexible. It can display a table of data with pager , plus it supports templates. With typical JSF table controls, they are rendered only as rows in a table. With ListView i can display the data in any format i want. So a particular list item info is not restricted to be in a row format. I can display it in whichever form i want( for eg: if i am displaying a product list to a user, i place a image to left, price, product info to the right), plus i get paging too.
Am sure JDeveloper + ADF + Java EE 6 will be a deadly combo just as it was for Java EE 5. Looking forward to it :)
Edited by: Nash Era on Jan 31, 2010 9:57 AM
Edited by: Nash Era on Jan 31, 2010 10:07 AM

Slow boot "DSMOS has arrived"

I've managed to get my boot time from about 1:10 to about 45 seconds by clearing clearing caches, checking permissions, repairing permissions, and a host of other suggestions on this board, but my computer still hangs for almost 20 seconds during the boot process after it logs "DSMOS has arrived."
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: MAC Framework successfully initialized
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: using 16384 buffer headers and 4096 cluster IO buffer headers
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: IOAPIC: Version 0x11 Vectors 64:87
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: ACPI: System State [S0 S3 S4 S5] (S3)
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement: initialization complete
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: mbinit: done (64 MB memory set for mbuf pool)
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: rooting via boot-uuid from /chosen: FBB4CB08-B625-37A8-AE95-BFFA4FF4DEC5
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: Waiting on <dict ID="0"><key>IOProviderClass</key><string ID="1">IOResources</string><key>IOResourceMatch</key><string ID="2">boot-uuid-media</string></dict>
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: com.apple.AppleFSCompressionTypeZlib kmod start
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: com.apple.AppleFSCompressionTypeZlib load succeeded
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementClient: ready
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: BTCOEXIST off
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: wl0: Broadcom BCM432b 802.11 Wireless Controller
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: 5.10.131.36
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: Got boot device = IOService:/AppleACPIPlatformExpert/PCI0@0/AppleACPIPCI/SATA@B/AppleMCP79AHCI/PRT0@0/IOAHCIDevice@0/AppleAHCIDiskDriver/IOAHCIBlockStorageDevice/IOBlockStorageDriver/WDC WD3200BEKT-60V5T1 Media/IOGUIDPartitionScheme/Macintosh HD@2
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: BSD root: disk0s2, major 14, minor 2
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: Kernel is LP64
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: FireWire (OHCI) Lucent ID 5901 built-in now active, GUID 002332fffec03b0c; max speed s800.
Apr 18 12:28:33 localhost kernel[0]: NVEthernet: Ethernet address 00:23:32:c0:3b:0c
Apr 18 12:28:33 localhost kernel[0]: AirPort_Brcm43224: Ethernet address 00:23:6c:7e:a1:49
Apr 18 12:28:33 localhost kernel[0]: IO80211Controller::dataLinkLayerAttachComplete(): adding AppleEFINVRAM notification
Apr 18 12:28:33 localhost kernel[0]: systemShutdown false
Apr 18 12:28:34 localhost kernel[0]: NVDANV50HAL loaded and registered.
Apr 18 12:28:34: --- last message repeated 1 time ---
Apr 18 12:28:34 localhost kernel[0]: AGC: 2.8.68, HW version=1.7.3, flags:0, features:4
Apr 18 12:28:34 localhost kernel[0]: Previous Shutdown Cause: 5
Apr 18 12:28:35 localhost kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Apr 18 12:28:53 localhost kernel[0]: AirPort: Link Down on en1. Reason 8 (Disassociated because station leaving).
Apr 18 12:28:54 localhost kernel[0]: NVEthernet::setLinkStatus - Valid but not Active
Can anyone solve this? Thanks in advance!

I've managed to get my boot time from about 1:10 to about 45 seconds by clearing clearing caches, checking permissions, repairing permissions, and a host of other suggestions on this board, but my computer still hangs for almost 20 seconds during the boot process after it logs "DSMOS has arrived."
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: MAC Framework successfully initialized
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: using 16384 buffer headers and 4096 cluster IO buffer headers
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: IOAPIC: Version 0x11 Vectors 64:87
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: ACPI: System State [S0 S3 S4 S5] (S3)
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement: initialization complete
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: mbinit: done (64 MB memory set for mbuf pool)
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: rooting via boot-uuid from /chosen: FBB4CB08-B625-37A8-AE95-BFFA4FF4DEC5
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: Waiting on <dict ID="0"><key>IOProviderClass</key><string ID="1">IOResources</string><key>IOResourceMatch</key><string ID="2">boot-uuid-media</string></dict>
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: com.apple.AppleFSCompressionTypeZlib kmod start
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: com.apple.AppleFSCompressionTypeZlib load succeeded
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementClient: ready
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: BTCOEXIST off
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: wl0: Broadcom BCM432b 802.11 Wireless Controller
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: 5.10.131.36
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: Got boot device = IOService:/AppleACPIPlatformExpert/PCI0@0/AppleACPIPCI/SATA@B/AppleMCP79AHCI/PRT0@0/IOAHCIDevice@0/AppleAHCIDiskDriver/IOAHCIBlockStorageDevice/IOBlockStorageDriver/WDC WD3200BEKT-60V5T1 Media/IOGUIDPartitionScheme/Macintosh HD@2
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: BSD root: disk0s2, major 14, minor 2
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: Kernel is LP64
Apr 18 12:28:32 localhost kernel[0]: FireWire (OHCI) Lucent ID 5901 built-in now active, GUID 002332fffec03b0c; max speed s800.
Apr 18 12:28:33 localhost kernel[0]: NVEthernet: Ethernet address 00:23:32:c0:3b:0c
Apr 18 12:28:33 localhost kernel[0]: AirPort_Brcm43224: Ethernet address 00:23:6c:7e:a1:49
Apr 18 12:28:33 localhost kernel[0]: IO80211Controller::dataLinkLayerAttachComplete(): adding AppleEFINVRAM notification
Apr 18 12:28:33 localhost kernel[0]: systemShutdown false
Apr 18 12:28:34 localhost kernel[0]: NVDANV50HAL loaded and registered.
Apr 18 12:28:34: --- last message repeated 1 time ---
Apr 18 12:28:34 localhost kernel[0]: AGC: 2.8.68, HW version=1.7.3, flags:0, features:4
Apr 18 12:28:34 localhost kernel[0]: Previous Shutdown Cause: 5
Apr 18 12:28:35 localhost kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Apr 18 12:28:53 localhost kernel[0]: AirPort: Link Down on en1. Reason 8 (Disassociated because station leaving).
Apr 18 12:28:54 localhost kernel[0]: NVEthernet::setLinkStatus - Valid but not Active
Can anyone solve this? Thanks in advance!

DSMOS has arrived - long boot

Hello,
I have SL on a 2010 uMBP with a 5400 drive and my boot time has become kind of long (more that a minute till the Desktop).
When I boot in the verbose mode I see that the boots stops for around *25 seconds* on the following message (kernel.log):
Jul 8 08:28:13 localhost kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Jul 8 08:28:38 localhost kernel[0]: AirPort: Link Down on en1. Reason 8 (Disassociated because station leaving).
If I open the kernel.log and search from DSMOS, I see older logs where it didn't wait so long:
Jun 8 07:41:13 mbp kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Jun 8 07:41:13 mbp kernel[0]: BCM5701Enet: Ethernet address 58:b0:35:fb:XX:XX
Jun 8 07:41:13 mbp kernel[0]: AirPort_Brcm43224: Ethernet address 58:b0:35:78:XX:XX
any ideas ?
Thanks,
Tex

Tex-Twil wrote:
Could you please check your logs and see how much time there is between the DSMOS message and the next one ?
Is this what you wanted, or did you want to see the message after the one for "DMSOS has arrived"?
Jul 2 10:12:40 localhost kernel[0]: Waiting for DSMOS...
Jul 2 10:12:40 localhost kernel[0]: AirPort: Link Down on en1. Reason 8 (Disassociated because station leaving).
Jul 2 10:12:41 localhost kernel[0]: Warning - kext com.apple.iokit.CHUDProf has i
mmediate dependencies on both com.apple.kernel* and com.apple.kpi.* components; us
e only one style.
Jul 2 10:12:42 localhost kernel[0]: NVDANV50HAL loaded and registered.
Jul 2 10:12:42 localhost kernel[0]: Previous Shutdown Cause: 5
Jul 2 10:12:42 localhost kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Jul 3 11:56:40 localhost kernel[0]: Waiting for DSMOS...
Jul 3 11:56:40 localhost kernel[0]: AirPort: Link Down on en1. Reason 8 (Disassociated because station leaving).
Jul 3 11:56:41 localhost kernel[0]: Warning - kext com.apple.iokit.CHUDProf has immediate dependencies on both com.apple.kernel* and com.apple.kpi.* components; use only one style.
Jul 3 11:56:41 localhost kernel[0]: Previous Shutdown Cause: 5
Jul 3 11:56:41 localhost kernel[0]: NVDANV50HAL loaded and registered.
Jul 3 11:56:41 localhost kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Jul 3 12:09:15 localhost kernel[0]: Waiting for DSMOS...
Jul 3 12:09:21 MacBook kernel[0]: NVDANV50HAL loaded and registered.
Jul 3 12:09:25 MacBook kernel[0]: Previous Shutdown Cause: 5
Jul 3 12:09:26 MacBook kernel[0]: wl0: Broadcom BCM432b 802.11 Wireless Controller
Jul 3 12:09:26 MacBook kernel[0]: 5.10.91.27
Jul 3 12:09:28 MacBook kernel[0]: Warning - kext com.apple.iokit.CHUDProf has immediate dependencies on both com.apple.kernel* and com.apple.kpi.* components; use only one style.
Jul 3 12:09:29 MacBook kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Interestingly, for these messages I only see the "has arrived" message, not the "Waiting for" message:
Jul 4 10:18:47 MacBook kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Jul 6 07:47:21 localhost kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Jul 6 10:20:47 localhost kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Jul 7 08:53:03 localhost kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived
Jul 8 10:24:49 localhost kernel[0]: DSMOS has arrived

Postfix/master "master exite time has arrived"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for