Posting document should not reveal salaries of employees to finance departm

Hi Friends,
After payroll posting the salaries of the employee should not be seen by finance department user by opening the posted document.
how to achive this?
Thanks
Jay

Hi,
Separate GL for this and make sure you do not allow it to post but I am not sure why you do not want to book ti to chart of accounts as it may cause balancing issues.
Thanks,
Ameet

Similar Messages

  • Billing document should not be cancelled after creating return sales order

    Hi All,
    Billing document should not be cancelled after creating return sales order with reference to billing document. Please suggest configuration settings on the same.
    Sudheer.

    Hi,
    In SAP, when the sub-sequent document is existing , we can not cancel the preceeding document. Therefore if you want to cancel the billing document you need to calcel the documents which are created with reference to that.
    Check and confirm.
    Regards,
    Ravi Duggirala

  • Document should not splitt to tax line items

    Hi,
    Document should not splitt for tax line items,currently it is happining how contol this.
    Thanks and Reg

    Hi,
    Then in the document splitting configuration, you can remove the base item category for this TAx Item Category.
    Regards,
    SDNer

  • Billing documents should not be created when it is not released to accounti

    Hi SD gurus,
    In some situation, billing documents are generated but it is not released to accounting which results in mismatch between FI value and SD value. We go to VFX3 and see the list of billing documents and take corrective action.
    Our requirement is that the billing document should not be generated when system is not releasing this billing document to accounting.
    Please suggest a solution for this.
    Regards,
    Senthil.

    Thanks giri.
    For the following reasons, the billing documents are not released to accounting.
    1. If the user wrongly chosen the billing type for the delivery.
    2. After creating condition type, it has to be assigned in COPA. If we forgot to do it, billing doc will not released.
    Our requirement is that if the billing document is not able create accounting document, the billing document itself should not be generated.
    Hope this will be suffice to understand my issue and suggest a suitable solution.
    Points will be rewarded.
    Regards,
    Kumar.

  • Natures of classes of accounts for posted document are not balanced

    Hi
    Can anyone help me with this error:
    "Natures of classes of accounts for posted document are not balanced"
    I am getting this error while doing GR(posting goods) using 561 movement type for a material.
    While I am able to post Goods with another material having same valuation class and Profit Center.
    Thanks
    Neha

    better post this question in procurement or (pure) finance forum!

  • Posting Document num not captured in BDC message table

    I am working on a dataload program for Asset Transfer using tcode ABUMN. If I run ABUMN online, it will give me the message saying, 'Asset Transaction posted with document no. xxxxxx' after saving the trx. However, I can't capture this message while running the Call Trx/BDX program.
    I don't know why the message table is empty after a successful Call Transaction. If there is an error, it will capture it, but no meesage if the trx is successul.  I thought the table will capture any message whether it is a 'S' or 'E' or 'W'. It works for other tcodes, but not for tcode ABUMN. 
    DATA: T_MESSTAB LIKE BDCMSGCOLL OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
    " Batch Input Message table
    call transaction C_TCODE using t_bdcdata
    MODE P_MODE
    UPDATE P_UPDATE
    MESSAGES INTO T_MESSTAB
    CAll Transcation is a standard code, so there is need to specify what types of message should be captured.
    I remember seeing some threads about the empty message table, and they suggest to use Parameter Id to capture the posting document #.  I tried  par id ' BLN' and still not able to see anything there.!!
    Can anyone help?
    Thank you in advance for any help. Greatly appreciated.

    Hi,
    I have come across with the same issue with transaction CS01. I have done it in a round away . I find an userexit after save , and export the  document number to memory and after the call transaction import the document number from memory and updated the BDCMSGCOLL table.
    May this info will be helpful to you.
    a®

  • Posting date should not be in future for vendor payments

    Hello Guys,
    Hope everyone doing fine....
    My question is: In F-53 or F-58, Posting should not be greater than entry date or system date.
    I did write a validation for this.
    Company code 1000, document type KZ, Transaction Code F-53(FBZ2) or F-58(FBZ4)
    Check: BKPF-BUDAT>SYST-DATUM
    Message Error:
    But it is not working.
    Could some one help me?
    Regards,
    SK

    Dear Srinivas,
    Change the check as follows from
    Check: BKPF-BUDAT>SYST-DATUM
    to
    BKPF-BUDAT <= BKPF-CPUDT
    add  BSEG-KOART = 'K' in prerequisite
    Regards,
    NCC  Talluri

  • Change in Useful life of asset in mid year, but the previous posted depreciation should not be changed

    Dear Experts,
    I have a requirement in one of my client, We need to extend the useful life of asset in mid of an asset fiscal year and the depreciation which was posted in the previous should not be changed.
    Requirement:
    Useful life of asset  is to be extended after completing depreciation for 4 years and in-between the current asset fiscal year. Provided the present asset value has to be taken as the new book value of the asset and the depreciation posted henceforth to be posted based on the new asset value till the remaining useful life.
    Previously posted depreciation should be unchanged.
    Analysis:
    1.      The fiscal Year followed - October to September.
    2.      The useful life of asset will be changed, and the depreciated value posted till 31/mar 2014 will have the old depreciation value ( based on the original acquisition value)
    3.      The Depreciation key used in of type LINR (linear), depreciation value will be calculated based on the Book value till the asset value becomes ZERO at the end of useful life of the asset.
    4.      We can change the useful life of the asset at the end of a Asset fiscal year say FY- 2014, if this is done the existing configuration will take the Book value of the asset at the end of the Fiscal as the asset value and the new depreciation will be calculated based on the new useful life of the asset. The asset value will become ZERO at the end of the newly changed Useful Life.
    5.      But the requirement is that the useful life of the asset will be changed exactly half way in between existing Asset fiscal (i.e., 31/03/2014), if this is done system will change the depreciation value based on the new useful life ( since the Dep Key is LINR), but the depreciation value will change from the fiscal start say October 2013 to September 2014 ), which will not satisfy the requirement of the client. Since the depreciation which is already posted from October 2013 to March 2014 should not be changed.
    Note:
    1. We are not willing to retire the asset and create a new asset with the remaining book value as asset value and start depreciation.
    Kindly let me know if the requirement can be fulfilled without retiring the asset.

    Dear All,
    This requirement has been completed.
    1. I created New Multi level valuation method with base 26 ( Net book value w/o Revaluation ).
    2. New depreciation key was created and the above method was assigned to it. I never changed the Base method.
    3. new interval was created in the depreciation area, with this created dep key and extended the useful life of the asset. The depreciation was calculated according to the requirement.
    Originally the asset had useful life of  5 Years, I changed the asset useful life to 8 years now with new Depreciation key 2001.
    Depreciation was already posted to the asset till 04- 2013 for an amount of 148.27 SAR.
    Net Book value carried forward to 2013 = 1575.56 SAR
    Depreciation already posted till 4th period =   148.27 SAR
    Current Net book value after useful life extension           = 1427.29 SAR .
    Now the new depreciation key 2001 with Multilevel method 201, will take this Net-book value as Asset value and will depreciate along the useful life of the asset till it becomes zero.
    Planned depreciation of 2013 ( remaining 6 months) = 166.24 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2014 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2015 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2016 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2017 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2018 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2019 = 131.25 SAR
    Total      = 1427.29 SAR ( the Asset value becomes zero at the end of its remaining useful life.
    The previously posted depreciation from 01.01.2013 to 30.04.2013 was untouched.

  • Reversal of a reversed document should not happen

    Dears
    In our system, user is able to reverse an already reversed document, which should not happen.
    In the Message Control F5 361, nothing has been changed to make this warning or information.
    Hence the standard is 'error'. But why the system is allowing the reversal of  a reversed document then ?
    Could you please provide inputs ?

    Hello Nikitha,
    Please create one validation according to your requirement. PFB the relevant T codes to create validation.
    GGB0 - Create Validation
    OB28 - Activation of FI validations
    GCT9 - Transport: Validations
    Please let us know do you still require any more information
    Thanks & Regards,
    Lakshmi S

  • Referncing document should not be changed

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    I have a scenario and it is for example that if sales order is created with reference to the quotation so quotation should not be changed....and the sales order should have the same material which is copied from the quotation and we should not enter other material in the sales order which is not in the quotation and same thing for the delivery.......so can anybuddy tell me that from where we can control this thing from the standard system......
    Regards,
    mohsin

    Basically i am making the sales order with reference to quotation and in the sales i can add the item which is the standard functionality but my client dont want this......my client want that sales order is created with the quotation so u cannot add item in the sales order and the quotation can not be changed...and it is for same in the delivery level also....when i am making the delivery with reference to sales order so still i can add item in the delivery order which my client dont want this....and my client also want that delivery order is created with the sales order so th sales order cannot be changed.......so if there is a user exit for this can any one tell me exact user exit......
    regards,

  • Default Posting date should not be changed / Field status in FB01

    Dear FI gurus,
    In Transactions like FB01, MIRO, FB60, FB70 posting date is appearing automatically. But this date can be changed by the users. We want that the posting date should be made "Display only". How this can be done. Kindly guide.
    thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    There is slight modification in the above mentioned answer:
    Company code = XXXX
    Check
    Posting Date (BKPF-BUDAT) <> Current Date (SYST-DATUM)
    Otherwise
    Give the message number and E (Error)
    regards

  • Accounting document should not generate.

    Dear Experts,
    There are certain Z reports in SD and FI in which we have value difference between SD and FI reports. One of the factors for this mismatch is due to adjusting exchange rate difference at FI level. For example, when a late realisation of payment, the difference amount due to exchange rate is directly updated in GL account entries
    Since this doesnu2019t affect SD, we are getting mismatch in the values from SD reports and FI reports.
    In order to eliminate this mismatch after it gets adjusted by FI, we want to issue credit/debit note for the value difference so that it will have an effect in SD reports, but we donu2019t want to affect the entries in GL accounts as it was already impacted directly.
    Solution
    We have crated a separate condition type ZABC and mapped with separate account key. This account key is Not Mapped with any GL account in VKOA. If above said case occurs to our client then he will maintain the price in ZABC condition type. Once the invoice is released the system is not generating accounting document but it say u201CAcc determination erroru201D.
    Note: it is not generating the accounting document but the Posting status of the billing document is B.
    Please suggest is there any other alternative way to address.
    bala

    Hiii
    As per my understanding you want to impact only on SD side where as it is already impacted on FI side due to Exchange rate.
    Now for comparing and reporting purpose you can use Proforma Invoice instead of Commercial invoice so system will not throw any error because no accounting entries will post and you can get report by clubing earlier invoice and proforma invoice.
    Regards
    Shambhu Sarkar

  • Posting date should not be in past

    Dear SAP Expert,
    in T code MB31, if date of posting is in past,  system should give error message.
    waiting for your valuable reply.
    Regards
    Pravin

    Hi,
    There is no direct control to avoid back dated postings in mB31.
    You can make use of user exit and write a code so that system will not allow back dated entry.
    You can try with this exit MBCF0009.
    CSN

  • Posted documents could not retrieve from Finance system (Travel Management)

    Hi Experts,
    I could sucessfully post the documents to Finance system using T.code: PRRW and when i click on FI/Co documents tab it is showing error Could not retrieve from Finance (FIN310) system, I have checked the ALE configuration form HR outbound documents are sucess also.
    Please advise where i have to check, there is no erros during posting posting was sucess with document numbers also.
    Appreciate your help if you could let me know if there is any other reports i have to run for posting.
    Thanks
    Murali

    The problem I faced was related but just slightly different - solution is below.  This is really only an issue if your AS Java server is on a different server than your NWDS and a firewall is active.
    Error when trying to publish ConverterWeb demo project from local dev machine CE 7.2 Netweaver Developer Studio  to server CE 7.2 AS Java was:
    Could not retrieve deployment system configuration for CE1. Please check if the system is running.
    [ERROR: 7/10/10 10:58 PM /userOut/daView_category (eclipse.UserOutLocation)
    Thread[Thread-22,5,main]]
    Issue is a firewall problem.  Solution  is:
    1) remove default SAP AS Java from NW Developer Studio (Windows -> Preferences -> SAP AS Java
    2) shutdown NWDS
    3) open ports 50113 (port for instance 1), 50013 (port for instance 0), 50004 (deploy port) and 5000 (http for NWASJAVA) on the AS Java server.
    4) open NWDS
    5) add SAP AS Java in NWDS (Windows -> Preferences -> SAP AS Java: host - 192.168.1.16, instance - 1, Domain - Default
    6) add SAP AS Java in NWDS (Windows -> Preferences -> SAP AS Java: host - 192.168.1.16, instance - 0, Domain - Default
    7) publish ear.
    8) navigate to: http://192.168.1.16:50000/ConverterWeb/
    obviously you'll need to replace the internal ip with the ip of your server.
    I think this firewall info is somewhere in the docs.
    Edited by: adamtarshis on Jul 11, 2010 8:16 AM

  • Original document should not copy thro save as Function in WORD & EXCEL

    Hi,
    When the microsoft originals like Word or XL file are displayed using ECL viewer in document display transaction (CV03N), the originals can be copied to local disc using " SAVE AS" function in microsoft word and excel menu. Is there any option to make those button in display mode.
    Please suggest.
    Regards
    Chandrasekaran

    Hi
    SAP DMS and also ECL Viewer & Office viewer does not have any authorization object for controlling "save as.." function.
    All existing authorization objects are related to Display originals. It means that if users have authorization object for Display an original, also they can "save as" this original.
    But you can set "save as" to gray (display) with ABAP codes by changing related screens.
    regard,
    akbar rangamiz

Maybe you are looking for