Posting Intercompany Vendor invoice

Hi All,
While posting the intercompany vendor invoice via VF01 the Idoc generated by RD04 output is errored out with the below error:
Field BSEG-MWSKZ . does not exist in the screen SAPMF05A 0302
Please advice......
Rgds
Prasad

Hello Prasad,
Please check if this helps.
Please check the master record of the reconciliation account
with transaction FS03. Set the field tax category 'SKB1-MWSKZ' to *.
Regards,
Raghavendra

Similar Messages

Issue in Posting of Vendor Invoice

Hi
I am having an issue in posting of vendor invoice. In simulation mode, the system is showing the correct calculation of TDS amounts. but when I am trying to post the Invoice , the TDS entries created by the system are deleted and system gives:
Error Message - The excise year could not be determined for generating the numbers for TDS certificates. The number range is linked to the Excise Year and not on the financial year directly.
Procedure - Check the customising done for the company code in the India version IMG. Maintain the start month for the excise year correctly.
There is no error for other company codes in the system and this happens for only one company code.
Under the India version for extended with holding tax , we have maintained the withholding tax number group and SAP Script forms , assigned number range to number groups and maintained number ranges for the company code.
Pls suggest
Regards
Sanil Bhandari
TDS Certificates. The number ra
on the financial year directly

Hi,
Just check if in the Withholding tax Type configuration - The Withholding tax certificate check box is checked. Just read the help for what is the implication of ticking that checkbox. This may be the problem.
Cheers
V.Krishnan
(assign points if useful)

System not allowing to post parked vendor invoice

Hi gurus,
Why system not allowing to post parked vendor invoice when workflow is used for gl document?????
It is saying not released and no one is allowed to post???
Thank you

Hi Mohit,
Post can be possible to next authorized level. Check settings or else go to FBV3 ,enter document number ,company code and year > Enter > where you can see the workflow tab > Click on that where you came to know how may release levels are assigned.
In same view > Click on system in menu bar > services for object > Click on workflow icon > where you came to know who is the next approver.
Regards
Mani

Posting Parked vendor invoice document

Hi Experts,
I have company code (ausbk), document number (belnr), fiscal year (gjahr ), using these parameters I need to post the parked vendor invoice document.
Please suggest how to write code or function module for posting parked vendor invoice document.
Thanks & Regards,
Sridhar

Hi,
You can post a parked document with T.code FBV0
& MR44 can be used to post a parked document
If useful, assign points.
regardrs
Sunil
Edited by: Sunil Goyal on Jun 4, 2008 11:28 AM

Doc Splitting - Intercompany Vendor Invoice

I am stuck with an issue while posting an inter-company vendor invoice involving two expense line items.
I have created two debit line items as follows:
40   40000601    service expenses    1000.00      1200 (co.code)
40    4000601     service expenses    1000.00       1400 (co.code)
31       7009        Vendor Colt              2000.00       1200(co.code)
However, while simulating the items for posting, vendor item is not split and each company codes and posting is not permitted saying that no unique company code assignment is found in Company.
Anybody please help me out by telling the splitting rule for this inter-company vendor invoice posting which will help to split the item and posting could be done.

Hi,
vendor line item is displayed only in the paying company code document information and in the other company code it will be clearing with the paying company code.
For eg:
    Buildings a/c (for company code 1000) Dr 1500
    Buildings a/c (for company code 2000) Dr 1500
          To Vendor a/c 3000
This is my actual entry.
If my paying company is 1000 then the vendor invoice will be posted completely to the company 1000.
and in the company code 2000 a clearing with company 1000 a/c for Rs 1500 will be generated according to our configuration settings.
System Entries will be:
in company code 1000
Buildings a/c    Dr 1500
Clearing a/c with 2000 Dr 1500
   to Vendor a/c    3000
in company code 2000
Buildings a/c    Dr 1500
to Clearing a/c with 1000 1500
So there is no Question of Vendor splitting as the invoice is paid by single company.
I think below information will be useful for you.
The way SAP FICO works is that it posts a accounting document in each company code rather than one single posting document. This is beacuse in SAP FICO, one accounting document is always assigned to one company code. A question naturally comes to mind as to how do the debits and credits match i.e. how do accounts balance. To balance accounts, SAP FICO automatically generates line item entries which are posted to a clearing account. Such clearing accounts are normally payables or receivable accounts within company codes. SAP FICO tags cross company code transactions with a common cross company code transaction number for reference. Some examples of cross company code transactions are:
1. Goods are sold by one company code to the another company code.
2. Goods are purchased by one company code from the other company code.
3. One company code makes a payment on behalf of another company code.

EDI Error in intercompany vendor invoice for Argentina

Hello.
While issuing and RD04 message for an inter-company customer in Argentina I received error 8A551: Format of reference document number is invalid., as in the attached file; the RD04 message is sent OK but the iDoc fails in 51 status.
What is the segment/field where reference number is expected? In analysis mode in we05 the segment indicated, E1EDS01 010 Segment 000088 has no field to enter any reference...
One FI consultant mentioned that this check-up is due to FI document determined during iDoc processing: RE checks the reference number format and we should change it, is there a way to do that through configuration?
I would like to keep this process as much "automated" as possible, for instance it would be better to have the vendor invoice created but parked pending the proper reference number.
All inputs are welcome, thank you in advance.

Thank you Patra, your suggestion can be implemented and I'm pursuing this path.
This may take up to 1 week to become available in the productive environment so meanwhile I'm also looking to an alternate way to "fix" that. One feasible method suggested by an FI consultant is to change the FI invoice type determined by the system, form RE to a different one.
Any idea of how can I do that?
Thank you.

Help with posting a vendor invoice through MIRO.

Hi,
We are having an issue with posting an invoice through MIRO where the purchase order has large number of lines cause it to exceed the 999 limit of SAP for the accounting document. While we are researching as to how to address this. I need help on how to get the invoice in and pay the vendor in the interim.
There are 171 PO lines, the max I believe that can be handled is 165 with out giving grief to the system.
Thanks.
Edited by: Chandra Muppavarapu on Sep 20, 2011 12:10 PM

Please check the below link, may be useful
more than 999 line items for an invoice

Incorrect Cost center posting on vendor invoice.

Hi All,
When a purchase order is created, the Account assignment tab on the Items has G/L Account 71005050 and cost center 100704. when a invoice is created, it is posting to the correct G/L account but to different cost center 100708. Please advice how to proceed.
Thanks
Rajanikanth.

Check whether you have assigned cost center 100708 to cost element 71005050 either in OKB9 or in the cost element master data.

Profit center splitting - Intercompany FB60 - Sales/Use Tax Vendor invoices

We are implementing Use Tax calculations for Vendor invoices and are stuck on an issue with profit center splitting when entering intercompany AP transactions (FB60).     The tax postings of the non-leading company are being split between the two company profit centers.
When posting a vendor invoice with more than one company the tax items of the leading company are posting with the correct profit center but tax items if the non-leading company are splitting between the profit centers of the two companies.   The total amount of the tax is still correct, just part of it is posted to the wrong profit center.
We are assuming this is a document splitting issue but changes to document splitting configuration did not get the desired effect of not splitting the tax accounts.
Are there any suggestions of particular areas of document splitting that we should look into or other areas that might be causing this profit center splitting for the tax items? Any ideas would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeff

Hi Murlidhar,
Here's a sample transaction with the problem results we are seeing. Normal AP transactions are posting fine, it is only when Sales/use tax is added that we are finding a problem with the profit center splitting.
Entering a two line FB60 transaction under company 0001.
Line 1 - Company 0001, profit center 220020, $100
Line 2 - Company 0002, profit center 250020, $100
SAP sends this transaction to our external tax system which returns the tax amounts to accrue for each line item.
Line 1 $7.30 for company 0001
Line 2 $9.05 for company 0002
When the transaction is then viewed in General Ledger View we see the tax amount of $7.30 posting to profit center 220020 but the tax amount for line 2 of $9.05 is evenly divided between profit centers 220020 and 250020.
The $9.05 should be posting only to profit center 250020 as the profit center assigned to line 2 of the transaction.
Thanks,
Jeff

Getting error while posting vendor invoice

Hi, I was trying to post a vendor invoice and am getting an error "Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled"
I have changed the field status of the posting key and the reconciliation account but am still getting the same message.
Can anyone please help?

Hi,
check the below links
balancing field "profit center" in line item 001 not filled"
Balancing field "profit center" in line item 001 not filled
This is a frequently asked question. Please search in the forums before you post a thread.
Regards,
Radhika.

Payment terms in vendor invoice posting

Hi all,
When using FB60 to post vendor invoice, I can't see payment terms and discount information under "payment" tab.
I had create payment terms in IMG, and assigned it to the vendor master record.
Do I miss anything?
Thanks for the help!
YuLin

Julia,
I use FK01 when I created the Vendor Master data and assigned payment terms to the vendor, I went to FK02 (change), and can see my assigned payment terms there. Is there any difference if I assign payment terms in FK02 rather than in FK01?
My problem is I couldn't see "payment terms" when I post a vendor invoice nor can I see it in line item display after I posted the invoice. I couldn't see the settings for discount either, not that I wanted to see the discount "amount".
I suspected that the settings for my new vendor is causing me this problem but not the payment terms itself, or could be the combination of company code and vender master record settings, so when I try to post invoice to this vender, I couldn't see payment terms, but while I post other vendor's invoice, I can see payment terms.. I could be wrong..
Yu Lin

Vendor invoice posting through IDOC - Cost center determination (OBCC)

Dear experts
As per SAP Notes 31126 and 137686 I have maintain all configuration settings for "Automatic posting of vendor invoice from Billing" in different company codes.
It is working perfectly the way we need,
we need help in Transaction Code "OBCC - Assign Additonal Accounts Assignments for EDI Procedure" here system asks for "Account Assignment ID" for determination of cost center for invoice flowing through IDOC.
I would like to know, what values I can give here so that system will determine the relvant cost center in KR document posted in FI.
SAP Note says minimum entry here as " * "
At present system is determining only one cost center for all services mapped.
Thanks advance for the help.
Best regards
S. Habib Pasha.

Hi all
request your help on above issue.
reg
S HABIB PASHA

How to release Parked vendor invoice to post

Hi Gurus,
We have checked posting release box in obwa so system trigger workflow. We want to use park and post for FV50 and FV60 both. But we dont want automated mails for FV60.
Now whats happening is that system is working fine for FV50 and generating mails for posting of document. But System is not allowing to post parked vendor invoice and saying it is not released. Can you please tell me what settings reqiured to release parked vendor and how to post it????
Thank You

Hi Mohit
Thanks for raising this query. It helped me to learn new things today. As far as your issue is concerned, I think it can be done by implementing BTE only and not through standard SAP configurations.
Check the link below on the basis of which I drew my conclusions as above
Probelm with configuration in OBWA/OBWJ | SCN
Get help of ABAP or Workflow consultant to implement to meet your requirement too.
Hope it helps
Regards
Mustafa

Correcting Cost Centers on a posted vendor invoice

Hi,
If I posted a vendor invoice with an expense account posted to wrong Cost Center, is it possible to correct it FROM FI and not within CO. I know we can allocate the costs within CO but I want the correction to be made within FI as well.
A workaround I was thinking is re-posting the following in FB60:
Debit Expense 1000 old Cost Cntr
Cr Expense 1000 new Cost Cntr
but this won't let me post an invoice with 0 in the "Amount" field in header.
Any other options?

If you can reverse the transaction i would suggest doing that using FB08 and re-key to the correct cost center. If you cannot do that, then you can post journal entry you mentioned using transaction FB50 or FB01 and NOT FB60. Since it is a transaction between two GL Accounts you cannot use FB60.
Hope this helps.
Shail

Posting Vendor Invoice

Hi.
This might be a silly question but i needs to understand.
Why shouldn't I use F-02(Document Type SA) to post a vendor invoice ?
I am still going to use the same posting keys , GL DR(40) & Vendor Credit(31) .
Still my entries are correct and hitting the same accounts.

Hi,
It is to differentiate the document types and number ranges, other wise you can use F-02 as well. There is no specific reason. But to control vendor documents serially you need to follow one document type that has seperate number range.
I hope it gives clear understanding.
Assign points if useful.
Sarma BH

Posting Intercompany Vendor invoice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for