Prepayment not equaling manual net salary

Dear Gurus,
Iam runninig prepayment for 1000 employees . But prepayment of 5 employees is not coming equal to net salary(All earnings - All deductions) when calculated manually.
I dont know why iit is making error in only some employees. Please can anybody help me.
Regards,
Muhammad Noman Shafique

Hi Muhammad,
Which legislation are you working for ?
There should be a balance with the name Net or Net Pay
For these employees, what is the value you see in the table pay_pre_payments for the month.
Do they have multiple Payment methods defined ? Say with 50% cash and 50% EFT.. or something similar ?
If that is the case, you might only be checking a part of the payment.
Its tough to debug such cases w/o seeing the complete details of the setup and employee data.
Cheers,
Vignesh

Similar Messages

Rounding off Issue (Net Value not equal to Net Price * quantity)

Dear Gurus,
Here is an interesting issue.The default calculation done in the pricing procedure is two decimal places.Now we consider a real scneario,consider the net value of 324 quantities of an item calculated is 36,049.86 .When it is divided by quantity the resulting value of net price is 111.265 but the system shows 111.27 by rounding it off.
Now here comes the problem,my client needs the rate to be shown on the order script to be two decimal places and the net value should be equal quantity * net price.So if we apply this,
324 * 111.27 = 36051.48
But the net value calculated by the system is 36,049.86.So it can be consluded that:
"Quantity * Net Price Shown is not Equal to Net Value calculated by the System"
Need an urgent resolution,project is stuck on this
Regards,
Sam Ahmed
Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Nov 3, 2011 12:14 PM
Please dont add URGENT in subject or in your post

Here is the pricing procedure,
We start with the amount condition types
                                        Unit Price        Units Condition Value
ZMRP     MRP                     1,700.00           10     PAC     55,080.00
ZTRP     Trade Price     1,445.00           10     PAC     46,818.00
ZDPR     Dist. Price     1,445.00           10     PAC     46,818.00         (GL)
Using Trade Price we apply the product discount of 23%
ZPRD     Product Discount     23.000-     %                    10,768.14-
Then we send discount amount to the gl by using condition type ZDIS
ZDIS      Discount Value     100.000-     %           10,768.14-      (GL)
tHE RESULTING NET VALUE IS 36,049.86      as 46818.00 - 10,768.14
     Order Item value     111.27      1     PAC     36,049.86
And the Net Price is 111.27

Is BDC's CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01' is not equals to ONLINE(manual) creation?

Hi Experts,
Ours is IS-Oil.
If the user do not enters/inputs OIC_MOT (Mode Of Transport) at ITEM level on the External Details popup, SAP will get it from Customar Master-KNA1 and populates on it, because its a mandatory field (OIC_MOT), but, do not throws an Error message and interupts the sales order creation process.
We have a inbound IDOC posting function module for sales order (VA01), which posts the sales oreders by using BDC (CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01') in the system. In this function module, we are not populating the OIC_MOT field contained segment by hoping SAP will populate/default it while it hits CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01' of my BDC of my FM of IB IDOC. But, SAP is not defaulting/populating and throwing error message (saying 'OIC_MOT field is a mandatory input field' data is missing) and IDOC is failing, pls. let me know Wht its so? is the BDC's CALL TRANSACTION 'VA01' is not equals to ONLINE (manual ) creation of sales order?
Thank you

Hi
Several transactions can ba a different behavior between online and bdc process, but if you simulate the trx by SM35 you should find out these gaps
I don't know OIL vertical, but the main transactions have a bapi can be used insted of BDC program (BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2, but perhaps there's a particular BAPI for OIL).
Max

Create employee vendor to post net salary

Hi Experts,
We have a client requirement where they want to post employee salary net salary to employee vendor. Currently i have configured employee salary to go to balance sheet account.
Can someone please tell me how to create employee vendor in HR and then post net salary to employee vendor account so the HR and finance can see employee wise ledger.
Really appreciate any help.
Regards,
Jyoti

Jyoti,
If you will refer your message, it is cleared that vendor of this PERNR is not created, In FI end, for every pernr they create vendor, so you please coordiante with FI people to resolve the issue,
This is a very simply issue, dont know why your FI people is treating like.
1. No creditor with the search key 1000 LFB1 PERNR 00100005 has been found
2. No vendor found for this selection
3. Required field GL_ACCOUNT was not transferred in parameter ACCOUNTGL
4. Error in document: HRPAY 0000000102 CLNTAVD510
5. No data was transferred in parameter ACCOUNTPAYABLE
Further read the doc. of Vendor accuount, you will get more clarity, Please go thru the same and discuss with your FI people
There are two kinds of vendor accounts available:
Fixed vendor accounts: Employee grouping for account determination offers the most precise means of control for posting to fixed vendor accounts.
Employee vendor accounts: Posting to employee vendor accounts enables posting for a specific personnel number.
In this step, you make entries in table T030 for the assignment of vendor accounts to symbolic accounts.
Example
Fixed vendor account
You want to deduct dues to various unions from the employees in your enterprise. For each union, you have set up a specific wage type for dues and a specific symbolic account. In this step, you assign a fixed vendor account to each of these symbolic accounts.
Employee vendor account
You want to post dues to a different vendor account for each employee. To this effect, you have created a symbolic account for all employees. In this step, you specify how the corresponding employee vendor accounts are determined.
Requirements
You have created the required vendor accounts in Financial Accounting.
You have carried out the step Define Symbolic Accounts. In that step, you created symbolic accounts with the relevant account assignment types (KF for fixed vendor accounts, K for personal vendor accounts). In that same step, you flagged the indicator EG-depend for symbolic accounts to which you want to post in line with the Employee grouping for account determination.
If you want to post to employee vendor accounts, you have entered the relevant personnel number in one of the following fields in the vendor master data of Financial Accounting. We recommend that you use the Personnel number field. If you use another field, you must enter the personnel number with leading zeros.
Personnel number
Search term
Telephone 2
Data line
Teletext number
Standard settings
There are no standard settings for posting to vendor accounts. If, in the step Define Symbolic Accounts, you have not created any symbolic accounts with the account types KF or K, you do not have to carry out the step Assign Vendor Accounts.
Activities
1. Enter the required chart of accounts.
2. To make settings for the posting procedure Personnel posting to vendors (HRK), choose Rules
3. Choose Posting key. Enter the posting key for postings to vendor accounts or copy the default values (21 for debit posting and 31 for credit postings).
4. Choose Accounts. Make the corresponding entries in the table T030.
a) If you want to assign a fixed vendor account to a symbolic account, and if required, an employee grouping, enter the number of the vendor account in the Acco column.
b) If you want to assign an employee vendor account to a symbolic account, and, if required a employee grouping, enter the relevant key (see table below) in the Acco column.
Personnel number in field (Vendor master data) Entry in the Account column (T030)
Personnel number    *0002
Search term    *0001
Telephone 2    *0003
Data line    *0004
Teletext number    *0005

SYST: Abnormal termination (ANLB-LGJAN not equal to ANLC-GJAHR)

Hi All
An asset got scrapped in 2009 and having an unplanned depn value for $100 which resultedi n negative NBV of -100.
This is impact closing of 2009 and opening 2011,
I am trying to post Manual depn (TT 640) in dec 2010 dated, but getting below error :
"SYST: Abnormal termination (ANLB-LGJAN not equal to ANLC-GJAHR) Asset NL010000002004510000
Internal tables ANLB-LGJAN and ANLC-GJAHR of asset NL010000002004510000 are not synchronous
I checked SDN and below listed message is similar to my error, but i am not able to understand much of the below message, m y understanding is there is no FY 2010 in table ANLC which is causing this error.
Could clarify on what steps needs to be done ?
How to syncronize ANLB-LGJAN and ANLC-GJAHR

Hi Aravind,
most of the time it is one of the following reasons from the link you have found.
another link with examples: Error AS02 AA 698 - SYST: Abnormal termination (T_ANLB not equal to T_ANLC)
1) Are the table fields T093C-LGJAHR, ANLB-LGJAN and ANLC-GJAHR in line
Example for a inconsistency:
T093C-LGJAHR: 2010
ANLB-LGJAN and ANLC-GJAHR: 2009
Solution: Repeat fiscal year change
2) Is table-field T082AVIEWB-AUTHORITY on 0 instead on 2
Example:
MANDT FIAA_VIEW AFAPL AFABER AUTHORITY
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 01..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 02 ..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 15..... . 2
100 ..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 20..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 30 ..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 34..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 35..... . 2
100..... . 01..... . ABC ..... . 37..... . 0 set to 2
Solution:
In note 900767 you find the report RACORR_VIEW0_SET to correct this.
3) Have ANLB and ANLC the same number of areas
Example:
ANLB has areas 01, 02, 03.
ANLB has areas 01, 02, 03 and 10
Solution in that case would be not that easy
regards Bernhard

Is not equal to operator not working properly in obiee 11g

Hi ,
I have 5 members in a dimesion ENTITY.gen5 (A,B,C,D,E) .
nOW , I am using a *"is equal to "* operator in that ,
ENTITY.gen5 = A;B .
Which results in a strange error while running the report :
Socket communication error : was attempted on somthing which is not socket .
or sometimes ,
Socket communication error : Oracle BI server is not currently running .
So , I tried with giving "is not equal to" i.e . ENTITY.gen5 != C;D;E .
Then , I am getting A,B,C . C is not desired here .
FYI , I have renamed ENTITY.gen5 member names in essbase once and after refreshing I tried the above .
OBIEE version : 11.1.1.6
essbase version : 11.1.2.1
Thanks in advance

In EM, go to Weblogic Domain, right click on bifoundation_domain and on the Security menu choose Application Policies.
Set Application Stripe to obi and click the blue arrow search button.
Highlight BIConsumer and click Edit.
Under Permissions locate Resource Name oracle.bi.publisher.scheduleReport. Highlight this and click Delete...
Click OK (top right corner).
Now log your user out of OBIEE and back in again, and the option should have disappeared from their New menu.

Nota Fiscal Manual i9(n4) com referencia a i8(e1) - rejetada - 269

Bom dia,
Estou com um problema, quando emito um nota fiscal manual modelo eletrônico antigo ( n4 ) com referencia a uma eletrônica antiga ( e1 ), o sejaz rejeita a NFe com código de status 269 - Rejeição: CNPJ Emitente da NF Complementar difere do CNPJ da NF.
O problema é que neste caso não é uma nota complementar, e sim uma nota de devolução. É o caso de problema de configuração?
Obrigado.

Certifique-se que o que nas configurações da sua cateroria de nf-e de devolução (presumo que seja I9) o tipo de documento definido seja a opção "6 Devolução" e não "2 Complementar".
abraç

Not Equals Function is not working in Mapping

Hi All,
i have to do mappig based on the Not Equals & And conditions
If the Material Group starts with "F"
                        And Material Type Not Equals to "ZPRO" means
                                    then send "FG" Else "FC"
Here Not Equals & And Functions are not giving success, Error throwing like
Cannot cast ZPRO to boolean] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.Bool method not[ZPRO
Please help in this
Regards

i have to do mappig based on the Not Equals & And conditions
If the Material Group starts with "F"
And Material Type Not Equals to "ZPRO" means
then send "FG" Else "FC"
Here Not Equals & And Functions are not giving success, Error throwing like
Cannot cast ZPRO to boolean] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.Bool method not[ZPRO
the logic applied is incorrect
NotEquals is a boolean function meaning it will accept only boolean values as input....
To check if the Material Number is ZPRO or not use the below logic
MaterialNumber                                            Then(FG)
                      ------equalS(TextFunction) ---- not -----ifWithElse ------------------ Target
Constant (ZPRO)                                                   Else(FC)
Regards,
Abhishek.

HOW TO BLOCK DELIVERY OF GOODS WHICH ARE NOT EQUAL TO SALES ORDER

Hi,
I want to block user to create any sales invoice for some customers based on sales order where quantity in sales order is not equal to invoice.
Thanks,
Anitha

Hi Anitha,
You can do this by selecting check marks on two field under BP Master data >>Payment Terms
1) Allow Partial Delivery of Sales Order
2) Allow Partial Delivery per row.
Thanks,
Regards,
Sudhir

Not Equal to Clause in BODS

Hello Experts -
I need to put this condition in transformation in BODS table1.col 1 Not Equal to table2.col2 .
I am not able to find NOT EQUAL TO clause in BODS. I have used != , But not working.
However equal to (=) is working fine.
Any suggestion how I can use not equal to ? (I want it in Where Tab)
Thanks
R

Rohan, please pull/drag your columns into where clause. do not simply write them. and for your condition chk it with " <> " .
hth
thx
deep

Succession of TaskSelectionEvent.getTaskIds is not equal to user selection

Dear all,
My configuration is JDev 11g R1 (11.1.1.4.0) and I'm currently working at ADF DVT Project Gantts.
At the moment a problem occurs within the TaskSelectionEvent: The order of the task Ids coming back from TaskSelectionEvent.getTaskIds are not equal to the order of my selection. I 'm selecting first task A and then task B. The method give back [B, A].
The code snippets based on the Oracle ADF faces demo:
JSP:
<dvt:projectGantt id="mygantt" startTime="2008-01-01"
endTime="2011-12-31" var="task"
value="#{PG.model}"
tooltipKeys="#{PG.tooltipKeys}"
tooltipKeyLabels="#{PG.tooltipLabels}"
dataChangeListener="#{PG.handleDataChanged}"
actionListener="#{PG.handleAction}"
partialTriggers="ctb2"
taskSelectionListener="{PG.handleSelectedTask}">
</dvt:projectGantt>
Java:
private List selectedTaskIds;
public void handleSelectedTask(TaskSelectionEvent evt)
selectedTaskIds = evt.getTaskIds();
What am I doing wrong?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Tom

For the use case where tasks need to be linked (user clicks the "Link" icon in toolbar after selecting tasks), getTaskIds() in handleDataChanged() would return ids in the order tasks were selected.

OBIEE Answe: Error when using "is not equal to/is not in" option in filters

Hi there,
I have a report with a column that uses EVALUATE function. I want to filter the results of the report by the values of this column. There's no problem when I use "is equal to/is in" option in the filter options. However with everything the same, when I try to apply "is not equal to/is not in" option I got an error message reading :
"Error Codes: YQCO4T56:OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46047] Datetime value @{pv_Period_End}{@{system.currentTime}[YYYY-MM-DD]} from @{pv_Period_End}{@{system.currentTime}[YYYY-MM-DD]} does not match the specified format. (HY000)"
The column is the following funciton:
CAST(EVALUATE('pob.Get_PP_Status(%1, %2)',"ПРЕПИСКА".PP_ID, DATE '@{pv_Period_End}{@{system.currentTime}[YYYY-MM-DD]}' ) AS CHAR(500))
Do you any ideas where the problem might be?
Kind regards,
Danail

Thru note 1909504 the Function Module FI_TAX_CALCULATION was changed and caused the error on the system of my customer.
Hope that helps.
Regards
Udo

Unable to Create "Not Equal to" condition in Variable creation

Hi ,
I am getting an error while creating variable at report level,
Well, my condition at variable creation is ----> sum(A) where [country] <> " x" ...(It is showing the results when the country is equal to x) and the converse for the same ... If I use [country] = "x" .. It is taking as country not equal to x ..
Please suggest me on this..
Thanks in advance ....

Hi ,
I am getting an error while creating variable at report level,
Well, my condition at variable creation is ----> sum(A) where [country] <> " x" ...(It is showing the results when the country is equal to x) and the converse for the same ... If I use [country] = "x" .. It is taking as country not equal to x ..
Please suggest me on this..
Thanks in advance ....

In a purchase order for 3 GR's Quantity does not equal the value

Hi,
I have found the difference in one purchase order, there have been 3 GRs where the Qty does not equal the Value. How has this happened?
Any guesses why the difference has come.
Thanks&regards,
Veena

Hi Vishal,
In po history for agt 3 Gr's Quantity does not equal the values. I hope the difference is Movement types. But exactly where to check this movements i am not getting.
Can you tell me this which T.code.
Tx,

=Time.isTimeWindowOpenNow - is there a NOT EQUAL option?

Hi,
I am trying to stop a job in a chain from running on a Friday for example.
As a precondition I basically need the opposite of =Time.isTimeWindowOpenNow or I need a option to do a NOT EQUAL to expression.
Is there a format to use to set a precondition like this?
(I am using the free version of CPS so I cannot set up custom Time Windows)
Thanks,
Adriaan

Hello Adriaan,
This function actually exists for days in the week, very useful in static recurring situations. But you know you are more flexible with time windows in terms of compensations for holidays etc.
Lets get to it though :-):
=Time.isDayOfWeekInSetNow('_XXXXX_') allows you to specify the days in the week the function should return true. The String contains 7 characters, every _ specifies a day you are not interested in, every X specifies a day you are interested in. The String goes from Sunday to Saturday, so my example specifies the working days.
Regards Gerben

Prepayment not equaling manual net salary

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for