Prevent a user from changing the Project ID in P6 EPPM 8.3.7

Does anyone know if there is a Global or Project Security Profile privilege that will prevent a user from changing the Project ID on an existing Project?  We are using Primavera P6 EPPM 8.3.7
Thank you,
Eric

Hi,
Below project security profile may help you,
Edit Project Details Except Costs/Financials
Determines whether the profile will enable users to edit fields in General, Dates, Defaults, Resources, and Settings tabs in Project Details. To assign a project baselines, users must also have the "Assign Project Baselines" project privilege assigned to their profile.
Regards,
Marcos

Similar Messages

  • Is there a way to prevent users from changing the Advanced, Connection, Settings Tab?

    I need to stop network users from changing the proxy settings to avoid the firewall. Is there any way to disable or prevent them from getting to the advanced, connections tab, and changing the settings for the proxy?

    You can lock the corresponding prefs, then users won't be able to change the settings.
    See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Locking_preferences
    See also http://kb.mozillazine.org/about%3Aconfig_entries

  • How to prevent multiple users from updating the same data in coherence

    Hi,
    I have a Java Web Application and for data cache am using coherence 3.5. The same data maybe shared by multiple users which maybe in hundreds. Now how do I prevent multiple users from updating the same data in coherence i.e. is there something in coherence that will only allow one user a time to update. If one user is in a process of updating a data in coherence and some other user also tries to update then the second user should get an error.
    Thanks

    I have a question on the same line. How can I restrict someone from updating a cache value when I a process is already working on it. I tried locking the cache key but it does not stop other process to update it , it only does not allow other process to get lock on it.

  • How to restrict the user to change the project structure but not the documents?

    Hi,
    I have created one project assigning different users in Solution manger. I want to risitrict some of the users to change the project structure but simultaneously allwoing the project documents to be created, edited or deleted using solar01 under Project documentation tab. For that I have followed the steps provided in the follwoing link.
    http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/SM/Howto+Restrict+Changes+to+Project+Nodes+to+Assigned+Team+Members
    I am able to restrict the users to change the project structure, but I am not able to allow access to the project documents. It gives me the message "You are not authorised to change the project". This fulfills my one of the requirements. But, Is there any way  to restrict the user to change the project structure but not the documents?. Any help will be apperitiated.
    Thanks,
    Rutvik Uapdhyay. 

    Hi Rutvik,
    Basically there are 2 different authorization role ...you should look for and customize as per requirement in Z* namespace.
    role  - SAP_SOLAR01_ALL
    this take care of objects in Solar01 like tab access etc
    role -SAP_SOL_KW_ALL
    this takes care of entire documentation within solman
    hope this helps
    Regards
    Prakhar

  • How to disable other users from changing the status

    Hi,
    The status entry field can be changed irrespective of ownership in Documents.
    I was able to change the status on the document created by other user.
    Example: The status of document was In-Work. The document owner was X. But I was able to change it to Inspection Check.
    How to disable other users from changing the status?
    Regards,
    Shashi

    This is a frequently discussed topic.Please use the search feature.It has been discussed in [previous posts|CV01N: Filter documents by role; in various contexts.
    Regards,
    Pradeepkumar Haragoldavar

  • I need to prevent unauthorized users from accessing the application pages

    Hi^^,
    I have created an application in jsp and servlets. It has several pages like manager, supervisor accountant. I need to prevent unauthorised users from accessing these pages. In other words I need to implement a filter. Anyone who types a url other than that of the login page needs to be blocked. However I am not able to conceptualize the code that is going to be inside the doFilter() method. Please help
    Sincerely,
    Prashant

    Hi^^,
    I admit that there were some mistakes in the previous posting. I have corrected the mistakes and now there is going to be no compile time error. However when i put in the login id and the password it is redirecting me to the login page. I think that the front end jsp is directing the control to the controller servlet. But as "YOU" have pointed out in your previous post,
    "by default requestDispatcher.forward(...) does not pass through the filter change. If the user requests the login page from their browser however, then they will still get the error message, which may not be appropriate."
    I feel we need to somehow make the code pass through the requestDispatcher.forward(...) method of the servlet.
    I am again posting the corrected code.
    package com;
    import java.io.*;
    import javax.servlet.*;
    import javax.servlet.http.*;
    public class SecurityFilter implements Filter
      public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, FilterChain chain) throws   ServletException, IOException
      HttpServletRequest req = (HttpServletRequest)request;
      HttpServletResponse res = (HttpServletResponse)response;
      String X = req.getRequestURI();
      if(X.equals(http://localhost:8080/MyProject/LoginPage.jsp))
         //writing code for passing through the filter
         final class MyGenericFilter implements javax.servlet.Filter
          public FilterConfig filterConfig;
          public void doFilter( final ServletRequest request, final ServletResponse response, FilterChain chain) throws java.io.IOExeption, javax.servlet.ServletException
          chain.doFilter(request,response);
          public void init(final FilterConfig filterConfig)
          this.filterConfig = filterConfig;
          public void destroy()
    else
       HttpSession session = req.getSession();
       String username = (String)session.getAttribute("username");
       if(null==username)
         request.setAttribute("Error","Session has ended. Please login");
         RequestDispatcher rd = request.getRequestDispatcher("Login.jsp");
         rd.forward(request,response);
         chain.doFilter(request,response);
        else
         RequestDispatcher rd = request.getRequestDispatcher("X");
         rd.forward(request,response);
    public void init(final FilterConfig filterConfig)throws ServletException
          public void destroy()
      Edited by: pksingh79 on Aug 12, 2008 5:23 AM

  • Is there a way to prevent a user from using the graph cursor legend to delete a cursor?

    I would like to have 2 cursors on a graph that can't be deleted by the user.

    Hi Dennis,
    I'm having this problem as well, and found your post. Are you referring to the Enabled State of the entire graph?  If so, this prevents the user from moving the cursor at all while the VI is running, which, of course, defeats the purpose of having a cursor at all.  Ideally, I would like to show the cursor palette and disable it's run-time shortcut menu.  This doesn't appear to be possible.   One workaround would be to hide the palle and instead include some indicators that show the cursors' values.  I'd prefer to show the palette to keep the program simpler.
    Any other solutions?
    Thanks,
    Alan
    Alan Blankman, Technical Product Marketing Manager and LabVIEW Developer
    LeCroy Corporation
    800-553-2769 x 4412
    http://www.lecroy.com
    [email protected]

  • How to stop  the users from changing the Decimal in SAP

    How  to stop  the users from changing User Profile

    Hai,
    It is not possible to restrict SU3 to display, because it has only S_TCODE has the authorization object.
    If you really want to restrict users from changing their profile you have to remove the SU3 access and give SU1 or SU2 which gives access only to Personnel details and Parameters.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Yoganand.V

  • How to Restrict the users from changing the Default variant of report.

    Hello everybody,
    The requirement is to restrict the users to save and overwrite  the default layout variant (Layout for higher managenet)set for the report, but at the same time they should be able to change and save the other layouts for which they are having access.
    I have written the logic in the program which is working fine for all the scenario when we execute the report. But the logic doesnt work if the user is selecting the layout on the output screen of the report.
    for e.g if the user runs the report using the layout varaint for which he is having the authorization then he gets the all 4 options so he then he can select the layout for which he is not authorized and he can overwrite.
    i have debugged and check as i have found that after the report output is shown all the layout paramater is controllled by the statndard SAP objects.
    Can anyone help me out in this issue.
    Thankyou in advance.
    *to get the default layout variant.
      w_save = 'A'.
      if p_vari is initial.
        clear disvariant.
        disvariant-report = sy-repid.
        w_variant = disvariant.
        call function 'REUSE_ALV_VARIANT_DEFAULT_GET'
          exporting
            i_save     = w_save
          changing
            cs_variant = w_variant
          exceptions
            not_found  = 2.
        if sy-subrc = 0.
          p_vari = w_variant-variant.
        endif.
      endif.
    *logic to check user authorization to change the layout setting.
      if p_vari = c_layout.
        if not sy-uname is initial.
          select single * from agr_users
                  where agr_name = c_role
                  and   uname    = sy-uname.
          if sy-subrc = 0.
            w_save = 'A'.
          else.
            w_save = ' '.
          endif.
        endif.
      endif.
    Regards,
    Satish.

    Hi Maine,
    Thanks for your reply.
    As you mentioned for your own program, you can control the parameter "I_SAVE", when calling "REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY".
    so already i have use the same logic and control the parameter through I_SAVE and here i am calling method ALV_GRID->SET_TABLE_FOR_FIRST_DISPLAY instead of "REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY".
    and it works fine when we execute the report but the logic doesnt work when the user tries to change and save the layout variant on the output screen of the report.
    Regards,
    Satish

  • Can I prevent a user from Deleting the Group Policy deployed power plan?

    I have Power Manager version 3.20 installed and am using the Group Policy template to deploy a customized power plan.  I do not want my users to have the ability to delete this custom plan, but I cannot find the option in the Group Policy to change the setting that would grey-out the Delete button in Power Manager.
    I have located the registry value that changes the function of Power Manager, it is: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Lenovo\PWRMGRV\PowerSchemes\42617646-BC99-48E2-B3AF-C562C25F4098\ProhibitModification.  If the value is 0, then the delete button is available.  If the value is 5, then the delete button is greyed-out.
    The problems is that the Power Plan ID number (the 42617646-BC99... part in the reg key above) changes from computer to computer.  That ID string seems to be tied somehow to the specific computer.  So, I cannot just create a Group Policy Preference to change that value in the registry, because that value is always going to have a different name.
    The computers are all ThinkPad T400 model and are running Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit.
    Can anyone suggest a different method to change this setting?  If not, is there any chance that the Power Manager application can be upgraded to include this control?
    Thank you!

    welcome to the forum!
    to add to what gan said, page 6 of the power manager deployment guide covers this policy over active directory.
    http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=TVAN-ADMIN#pmat
    http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=MIGR-70419
    ThinkStation C20
    ThinkPad X1C · X220 · X60T · s30 · 600

  • How can we restrict users from changing the data in HFM.

    Hi All,
    We have requirement from users where, They don't want the base data being loaded from SAP to HFM via FDM through ERPi to get changed in HFM at <Entity Currency>. They want data to be read only and no body should be able to change neither Grid nor Forms and neither Smart View. If we restrict by Shared services access then again they can't change ownership management value.
    Regards,
    Sushil

    Hi Thanos, Thanks for your reply.
    Yes i am aware of the security class, so your suggestion is to use security classes to restrict users? And how can i use the phased submission for the same?  I am new to HFM so please bear with me.
    I have one more question that my Application is HFM EPMA application. So is it necessary to have Application Administrator to change hierarchy and Deploy the Application from EPMA?
    Thanks,
    Sushil

  • Is there a way to prevent AD users from accessing the VPN?

    I have ASA 5510's that authenticate users to the Active Directory. Is there a way to prevent users, that even though they are validated through the AD from being to establish a VPN connection?

    Haven't tested this lately, but with the ipsec client, you used to be able to go to an AD user's "dial-in" tab, and there was a check box there for "allow remote access" or something that. If this was checked, they could authenticate via IAS, if not, they couldn't. This allowed only selected users within AD to use the VPN. Not sure if this is still the case, but it's a start...

  • How do I prevent a user from having the rights to approve a document in approval workflow?

    I have a document library with the SharePoint 2010 approval workflow assigned. Documents must be approved before a major version is checked in.
    The checkbox "Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item." is checked for the workflow.
    I want any user to be able to create a document and submit for approval but I only want a subset of people to have permission to approve the documents submitted for approval
    How do I only allow certain users be able to be selected to approve a document?

    Deleted other posts because pictures did not upload.
    I have done exactly as has been indicated, yet User1 can still assign User2 as the approver and User2 can approve the check-in when the "Open this task" button is clicked in the approval
    email in Outlook and the approve button is click in the displayed dialog.
    Here are the permissions for the SharePoint Group:
    Here are the members of the Demo Gallery Contributors SharePoint security group:

  • How do you prevent a user from using the playback bar to skip questions?

    Hi,
    I am fairly new to Captivate and I had a question regarding the quiz feature in Cap4. I have some users testing the module for me and they are able to skip questions. I have done the following: 1. Made the quiz required 2. removed the review buttons.
    Is there something I am doing wrong?
    Shal

    Hello,
    You could hide the playbar, since it is not really needed for Question slides: on entering the first question slide you assign the value 0 to the system variable cpCmndShowPlaybar, and when you want to show it again, assign the value 1.
    Lilybiri

  • Is it possible to prevent users from changing iPad background?

    I am currently helping deploy 130 iPads for a school using Apple Configurator. I have set the desired wallpaper and lockscreen text via Apple Configurator, however this can easily be removed if a user decides to change the lockscreen wallpaper. Is there any way to set a restriction that would prevent a user from changing the lockscreen wallpaper? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated! Thanks for the help in advance!

    I heard that with iOS6 MDMs could have the ability to remotely change the wallpaper and lockscreen OTA. So far Airwatch is the only one I've heard of that claims to be able to do it:
    http://www.air-watch.com/company/news-room/press-releases/2012/09/airwatch-offer s-same-day-comprehensive-support-for-apple-ios-6
    (scroll down to "New MDM Capabilities")
    I hope other MDM's adopt this. It sure would be nice to be able to do this from an MDM.
    Hope this helps!
    ~Joe

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problems using JAAS with EJB 3.0 on JBoss 4.0.4-GA

    Hello all, I am trying to build a very simple JavaEE application with JAAS, but I getting mad. I have an EAR packed with a WAR module an EJB JAR module and a JAR with other classes. Struts is the MVC framework and EJB 3.0 is been used. First of all,

  • Won't export to Flash MX 2004

    This is the message I get when I export: "To export a Captivate movie to Flash, you should have Macromedia Flash 2004 installed." I do have Macromedia Flash 2004 installed. In fact I removed Flash 8 from my machine and restarted just so there would b

  • I have installed new version and now pandora and youtube just tell me to install latest version

    I have tried multiple times to uninstall and install over and over again and nothing seems to be working.

  • Search material in payload

    I have 1000's of IDOC (same idoc, message type, same interface) in SXMB_MONI. How do I search for material name in the payload to find corresponding IDOC and the payload contents? It is difficult to open each message from SXMB_MONI and search the pay

  • Bridge + VCue CS4, no status updates in details?

    Heyo, we're migrating to CS4 and planning to use Bridge/Drive to replace using Projects and Network version control.  Everything is setup and working pretty well, but I seem to be having issues being able to see the version cue status of a file in Br