Pricing calculating issue

Hi,
I have a specific issue regarding pricing:-
The requirement is that the following entry should be passed in accounting while billing:-
Dr. Revenue 100
Cr. AR 100
Dr. Cost of sales 5
Cr. TAX payable 5
For this requirement we have maintained a condition of TAX in pricing, assigned accrual key & account key & it is determined on net price. We have also assigned G/L (both columns) for the same in VKOA.
I copied from WUST as ZWUS, and checked it as accrual conditon type. and the GL documents are created successfully.. BUT no accural account is hitting for Dr. Cost of sales 5
Cr. TAX payable 5.....
Pls help !!!

Hi,
Can you confirm whether you have maintained the Accrual account key in V/08 for the TAX condition type.
For Account key (ex. ERB), you should maintain the G/L account in VKOA.
For Accrual you should maintain the G/L account and Provision Account.
For your reference you can check the Rebate condition types BO02 in Pricing procedure RVAA01 in V/08 and also check the Account Assignment in Account key combination in VKOA.
Hope this info will solve your problem.
Regards
M. Lakshmi Narasimhan

Similar Messages

Pricing calculation issue.

Hi,
I have a specific issue regarding pricing:-
The requirement is that the following entry should be passed in accounting while billing:-
Dr. Revenue               100
Cr. AR                         100
Dr. Cost of sales         5
Cr. TAX payable           5
For this requirement we have maintained a condition of TAX in pricing, assigned accrual key & account key & it is determined on net price. We have also assigned G/L (both columns) for the same in VKOA.
Now, when we create a order, in the pricing, the net value just above the conditions is showing Rs. 105. How can we possibly configure in the system. I tried making TAX condition as both Discount/Surcharge & Taxes.
Thanks in advance.

first of all,
what makes you to maintain accounting entries as mentioned in your post.
as you know, Total value of the billing document will be Debited to Customer a/c- & then the same amount will be distributed in different heads . ( excluding statistical / accrual conditions)
Eg:
Customer Dr - Rs. 105/-
Revenue Cr - Rs.100/-
Tax Cr - 5/-
Cost of Goods sold already accounted when you perform PGI. Why you want the same after releasing invoice?
It would be more helpful, if you post the complete requirement & clear.

Pricing calculations

Hi Guru,
my pricing calculations as per the detials given below
Description     Condition Rate     Condition Value
Gross Price           150,000.00
Discount              -5%                        -7,500.00
Net Price                          142,500.00
Tax            2.25%         3,375.00 on Gross
     Total Value     145,875.00
Tax is always on gross price & using tax code for calculating the tax value.
As per SAP std., tax should be calculated on net price.
How to map this in SAP. this can be done by using seperate tax condition at MM pricing procedure.
How to map this using tax procedure.
Thanks in advance
Suitable solution will be rewarded
Regards,
Prasad.K

Hi,
In SAP, When calculating Tax you indicate on which condition should tax be calculated by means of Base. You can also use Alternative Base Condition. In order to you use you will have to write a routine and include the routine under "Alternative Base Conditon" value.
Rgds

MRP minus Pricing calculation Schema

Hi,
Can anybody let me know the complete configuration steps including master data settings for implementing the MRP minus pricing in SAP Retail?
Explaining my query here in details
Supplier has provided MRP to the Retailer. Retailer has decided the margin and then calculating the supplier cost on which they will procure the items from supplier. Now here we know MRP, Margin and then calculating cost so doing exactly reverse pricing. There are few doubts in mind and same sharing with you
1. Do I need to maintain first maintain MRP i.e. VKP0 = MRP?
2. Then do i need to flow the VKP0 value to purchasing calculation schema for reverse pricing?
3. What is the role of here SD pricing calculation schema WWS001 if we already know VKP0 = MRP?
Please help me. If it is possible then please mail me complete documents for MRP minus in SAP Retail.
Thanks,
Ashish Kumar

mantain the two condition one is to copy VAT condition and another is for required price which needs to be reversed.
Noe create one routine from ABAPER and assign the same for the VAT condition as well as basic price condition
logic for routine is
Y = X-[(12.5/100)Y]*
regards,
sujit

Essbase Calculation issues from version 6 to 7

Hi does any one know are there any calculation issue with essbase BSO cacl engine from version 6 to 7. Cube which calculates fine on 6 verison never ends to finish on version 7, does any one have ideas about number of max generations and levels possible under dense dimension in verison 7

Not sure if it was a 6.5.1 to 7.1.5 issue, or if it was that 6.5.1 was on Win2K and 7.1.5 is on Solaris 5.9. But, I had one calc script that for total company on Windows and 6.5.1 ran in about 2 1/2 minutes, but same calc on same outline on Solaris and 7.1.5 ran in over 2 hours.
Hyp support was able to offer some suggestions on Unix settings, and some undocumented script features that got the runtime down to around 10 minutes, but didn't get any farther than that.
Luckily for me there also was some functions that were not resolving correctly in the script so I had to take the functions out (turned a 100 line script into an 800 line script), and wouldn't you know it that fixed the slow run time as well.
Message was edited by:
RobertR

Inaccurate Pricing Calculation

Hi All,
I have set Master Price for material A as USD 337 per Car. One CAR includes 12 EA.
I made a sales order including 5 EA of this material A.
With manually calculation, the condition value of these 5 EA material A should be USD 140.42.
However, SAP shows it as USD 140.53.
Can anyone tell me what is the problem causes the Inaccurate Pricing Calculation?
Cheers,
Simon.

HI,
This is more to do with Rounding difference. Do you have Diff condition in your pricing procedure.
Read SAP note 1158475. This should solve your problem.
Aslo check if the Rounding tick is activated in contion type in case of group condition
Thanks,
Mauryan.
Edit
Edited by: Mauryan on Apr 29, 2011 9:28 AM

Reg:Getting MAP into Sales Pricing Calculation

Hi Gurus,
Could you provide information to get the Moving Average Price into the Sales Pricing Calculation in IS Retail?
Regards,
R.K

Hi,
Please configure condition type VPRS in your Sales pricing procedure and mark it as statistical.
Then allow the cost calculation indicator in your Item catogry definition.
Please maintain the same and check with the sales order pricing.
It should pick up the Standard price or Moving average price from material master.
Reward points if this helps.
Regards,
Harsh

Pricing date issue

Hello All,
We have an issue with the Line item pricing date.
In our project we are using the supersession functionality; we have one sales order with header pricing date ex: 25.12.2008 with some line items, for line item 10 we have created superesession material on 01.01.2009 with other material and maintained the pricing condition records validity date same as 01.01.2009.
We maintained in a way that if the material is not available and superseded material is available one job will run and creates the new line item with superseded material and copies the all information from the old line item. Here the problem is it copied the old material pricing date as 25.12.2008 due to this the new line item price is not calculated because the condition record is available from 01.01.2009 and it is disable mode.
Can any one give an idea how to solve the above issue.
Thanks and Regards
Srinivas Kapuganti

Hi Srinivas,
reading the answer above, there are 2 ways to solve your problem:
1) Modify the logic that determines the pricing date
2) Use the pricing reference material field (i.e. workaround)
Unfortunately in the landscape currenly i'm working, I haven't installed APO... So I cannot make any tests in a similar landscape.. however I can try to suggest to you something...
Concerning the "idea" N. 2 you have:
A) To check (from a "business point of view") if superseeded material and the new material have the same price.. I think so.. In the past I've worked as consultant in an A&D company and we have implemented supersession.. Usually, from a "commercial point of view" no impact on pricing must be "charged" to the customer because "supersession". So, usually, the superseeded material and the new one has the same pricelist...
B) From a "technical" point of view, try change manually the sales order updated by APO BOP and fill (manually) the field VBAP-PAMTN (item detail, tabstrip "Sales B") and, please, check if SAP determines the correct price condition record.
C) If test in point B is "ok".. I think that when BOP try to change the sales order, the userexit move_field_to_vbap will be called (include MV45AFZZ).. If you are able to understand to which "old" SO item is referred the new one, you can use this exit to fill VBAP-PMATN field of the new item with the superseeded material code (the old one)....
Advantage:
1) You don't have to change the program called by RFC from APO (maybe it requires an out of standard solution? I don't know..). You have "only" to implement an userexit..
2) SD pricing date will be, also for the new item, the 25.12.2008; but, in this case, SD will be able to find (via PMATN field) the pricing condition record linked to the superseeded material. This solution is Ok if hypotesis in point A) is correct. Otherwise it make no sense.
Sorry for quite long answer. Hope this help.
Have a nice day - Massimo

Pricing Computing issue..

Hi,
In the pricing procedure, I made two condition type is statistical.
During the net value calculation it considers the statistical condition type values also.
Strange, can you suggest, is there any other place other v/08, do we need to maintain statistical value?
Little urgent issue.. help need

Hi,
Thanks for your effort.
But, I can't restructure my pricing procedure.It should be the same way what i mentioned.
You guys say, if I mention 50 to 80, it will consider the statiscal value also?
New apporach
I created a new alternative calculation type and attached to nete value calculation. which will calculate 50 +60 +80.
But, why SAP strangly behaves?

Codition type for pricing Master Issue

Dear All,
For my domestic pricing procedure I created one condition type for Tax Calculation, where I put condition Condition Class : Tax(D) and Calculation Type : Fixed Value (B) only and maintained in the pricing procedure.
But at the time of making PO when I put certain value in amount field it is not calculating in Condition value field of the PO item.
So kindly suggest me the solution regards to resolve this issue.
Thanks and Regards
AKS

Dear Ramesh/Harsh,
This this special condition type I required for only show the value (reference purpose) which was drawn from TAXINN procedure and show the total PO value in condition tab both in header and item wise.
Thanks and Regards
AKS

Pricing calculation to diferent UoM

Hi,
we are trying to create a sales price calculation to diferent purchase UoM.
Example:
purchase UoM Car----> 1$/ST
purchase UoM Pal----> 0,8$/ST
But when we do the pricing, the pricing schema only pic's the first price. It's possible to do the pricing for 2 diferent purchase prices?
Thank you very much.
Best regards

Hi Pedro Barros,
You can have multiple unit of measures based on your requirements i.e.(a) Base unit of measure (b) Purchase (c) Sales and (d) Distribution / Issue
The order unit is copied to the purchasing info record, where it can be changed for each vendor. Subsequent changes to the order unit have no effect on the purchasing info records.
But you can't have multiple purchase unit of measures for a single material / article master.
Bye,
Muralidhara

Income Tax Calculations - Issue

Client is saying that as per their existing SAP system, the Income tax calculation is made on Gross salary. And they are saying that if any additional taxable payout is made in a month to an employee, then the total tax on this additional payout should be paid by the employee in the same month. So basically his total tax would be the (general regular monthly tax + total tax on the additional payment), which as per them the system is not calculating correctly since October 2010.

Hi,
Thanks for your reply Jurgen & Remi. I am pretty new to Payroll & this is India Payroll.
Now, the issue is how should I proceed ahead.
1. The client says that the wage types are already configured in the system in such way that on certain wage types, the tax which is calculated is paid in the same month. Can u pls inform that which processing class & cumulation class do I need to check in Table 512w_d for this wage type.
2. As I need to see this whole functioning in Schema, pls guide as to where I should check this whole tax calculation in Schema.
3. The function I have heard which is used is India for Income tax is INTAX.
Looking forward to your reply.
Thanks a lot!!!
Edited by: SAP ST on Nov 25, 2010 7:24 PM

Grace period calculation Issue

Hi Gurus,
in oba3 i created a tolerance group for which the grace period is 3.
i assigned this tolerance group to my customer,so that the due date is extended to 3 days from the due date.
i have a payment term which gives 5% cash discount when paid within 15 days and item due in 15 days.
i have a customer invoice whose baseline date is 18.08.2010. The item should be due only on 18.08.2010 + 15 + 3 = 05.09.2010, with the cash discount.
05.09.2010 is a sunday.
my query is, my customer decides to pay the item on next business day,06.09.2010,monday and looses his cash discount. which should not have happend.
how can we solve this issue.ie, the due date calculation by adding grace period should exclude weekends and public holidays.
what i have tried is, maintaining entry in obba for my house bank which calculates the value date.
but it didn't prove succesufull. i am using f-28 to manually clear the customer invoice created using f-22.
someone sleep over this and help me
thanks and regards,
ficoguy.

Hi,
Try function module HOLIDAY_GET, snippet of code:
CALL FUNCTION 'HOLIDAY_GET'
       EXPORTING
            holiday_calendar           = 'ZA' - (Country e.g. South Africa)
            factory_calendar           = 'ZA' - (Country e.g. South Africa)
            date_from                      = HOLIDAY_DATE_FROM
            date_to                           = HOLIDAY_DATE_TO
       IMPORTING
            returncode                      = return_code
       TABLES
            holidays                          = holiday_tab
       EXCEPTIONS
            factory_calendar_not_found = 1
            holiday_calendar_not_found = 2
            date_has_invalid_format    = 3
            date_inconsistency         = 4
            OTHERS                     = 5.
Regards,
Vuyo

Codition type (JADC) for pricing Master Issue

Dear All,
In my Import pricing procedure I maintained one condition type JADC for Additional Excise Duty, For the same condition class :A,Calculation Type:A and condition category:B. and configured properly in Import calculation schema.But when I am putting any percentage in Import PO and going to provide excise commissioner vendor code the field is not coming over their. Mean while with same condition type settings all other conditions like CVD,Chess on CVD are working properly.
So kindly guide me is their any other settings has to be made for coming these field in PO ??
waiting for your earliest replay
Thanks and Regards
AKS

Hi
Try this
Goto FTXP enter your tax code,and goto environment select calculation procedure and select procedure and select your procedure and control,check wheather youc condition type JADC is maintained in that .
Thanks

Depot pricing procedure issue

We are trying to configure Depot Sales. I have done stock transfer from manufacturing plant to Depot. GR was done based on replenishment delivery and excise document entry . now when i am doing sales from depot the excise amount that i captured at plant through j1iin has to be passed to depot. We have set 356 routine and EXD accounting key in depot pricing procedure ZJDEPO for JEX2, JEEC & JA1Y condition type.
After release to accounting of billing document generated in depot, the excise entries calculated on base price at depot is getting posted. Our requirement is to pass the same excise duty amount that we paid while removing the material from factory to be passed to the customer.
Correct me if there is any mistake in my pricing procedure. Please suggest how i can pass the same amount to the customers.

i have already done all settings for depot & the excise values are flowing from plant to depot using alternate calculation type 356. but the values captured in JMOD , JECS & JA1X financial condition records gets transferred to depot. the base price in stock transfer pricing procedure is 40000 and the base price set at depot is 36000.
so the excise calculated at plant is 4000, 40, 80. in depot after doing J1IJ the same values are getting passed for jex2, jeec & ja1y. but for jmod, jecs & ja1x the values are 3600, 36, 72 which is posted in accounts after release to accounts.so please suggest how to pass the correct excise amount to accounting.

Pricing calculating issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for